A Problem - Dhamma Wheel

A Problem?
- Dhamma Wheel
Dhamma Wheel
A Buddhist discussion forum on the Dhamma of the

Theravada
FAQ
Search
Search
Register
Login
Board index Modern Theravda Discovering Theravda
A Problem?
Forum rules
Post Reply
Search this topic

Search
21 posts
1
2
A Problem?
by Collective Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:20 am
P
o
Found
this interesting:
s
t
Collective
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009
8:12 am
"As a former Buddhist I have come upon a fundamental fallacy that no Buddhist (including
several high Tibetan Lamas) have never been able to answer. There are a few facts that one
has to confront first.
1. All Buddhists believe that once you have attained enlightenment--i.e. become a Buddha-you can never go back. Attaining enlightenment changes you forever, whether you are a
Mayahana buddhist and return to the cycle of existence as a boddhisatva or as a Therevaden
enter into Nirvana and stop the cycle of rebirth.
2. All Buddhists believe that we have lived an infinite number of prior lives. This is because of
the law of dependent origination. All phenomena have a cause which precedes it in time. This
gives rise to the law of cause and effect, or karma. Tibetans have a rather beautiful way of
encouraging compassion in this respect. They say that every sentient being has been your
mother in a prior life, not just once, but an infinite number of times.
So...if this is true then it must be impossible for me to attain enlightenment, as I haven't
become enlightened yet, even though I have had an INFINITE number of lives to do so.
I have asked zen monks, Tibetan lamas (Lama Zopa Rinpoche, Lama Choden Rinpoche, Lama
Ribur Rinpoche, among others, this question and they either shrug their shoulders or laugh.
But nobody gives me an answer."
What do you think?
o
p
Sanghamitta
Re: A Problem?
http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=3639&p=53495[13/8/2558 1:14:41]
A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009
9:21 am
Location: By the River
Thames near London.
by Sanghamitta Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:29 am

P
o
Frankly
I unable to ascertain what this " former Buddhists "" unanswerable question" actually is.
s
I twould be interested to see if others can. Not being able to become Enlightened because we
are not Enlightened hardly amounts to a serious discussion point.

The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.
Bhikku Bodhi.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Ben Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:30 am
P
HioCollective
s
t
Ben
Site Admin
Posts: 17124
Joined: Wed Dec 31,
2008 12:49 am
Location:
War.loun.dig.er.ler
Contact:
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
B
e
n
What I think is that I am motivated by a deep and profound sense of urgency to change my
current situation of delusional suffering and live a life informed by sila, samadhi, and the
development liberative wisdom. And for me, that's what its about.
metta
Ben
No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later.
All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance
in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) Buddhist Global Relief UNHCR
e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com..
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Upasaka Sumana Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:20 pm
P
If oEnlightenment were impossible, why would the
s
t
Buddha teach that it IS possible?
My motto, philosophy, and guiding principle: You should do whats good, Stephen. You should do whats good.
Always choose whatever is good.
Upasaka Sumana
Posts: 885
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009
2:53 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
U
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by sattva Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:37 pm
P
o
Who laughed the Zen monks?

Seriously though, this is one of those in the head questions and even though my own logical
thinking could be better, it seems to me that there is some faulty logic going on.
sattva
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu May 07,
2009 10:07 pm
Location: the western
part of Maryland
1. Bodhisattvas are those who stop before full enlightenment to come back to help others. They
have not experienced full enlightenment. To do so, would mean not to be born again.
2. Just because there have been an infinite number of rebirths, why would this negate
eventually stopping that process? It is often described as a flame going out. The flame could
have been passed on and on and on from candle to candle infinite number of times, but once it
has been blowned out, it is done (I am using an example of the candle because i can't think of
anything better to use).
Yes, you are right it is impossible for you to attain enlightenment.
No, you are wrong it is possible for you to attain enlightenment.
Perhaps, you could find a cushion, sit down, follow the breath, and let it all go....
https://www.facebook.com/MountainGateSanmonjiZenCommunity
http://www.sanmonjizen.org/index.html
My avatar is one of many calligraphies painted by my teacher. Mitra Bishop, Roshi. She has them for
sale to try to raise money for her building project. Also, if you purchase books on Amazon, you can
use Amazon Smile and put in Mountain Gate (In Ojo Sarco, NM) and a small % will go to the
monastery.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
P
o
s
Ben wrote:
t
Hi Collective
sattva
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu May 07,
2009 10:07 pm
part of Maryland
What I think is that I am motivated by a deep and profound sense of urgency to change my
current situation of delusional suffering and live a life informed by sila, samadhi, and the
development liberative wisdom. And for me, that's what its about.
metta
Ben
very beautiful, Ben


monastery.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Adrien Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:55 pm
P
o are saying that there is a logic saying
You
s
t
Adrien
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010
9:31 pm
Location: France
that if there is infinity, then there is no end.
I don't know the right terms in english, but in mathematics, a half-line as an infinity of points in
one side, and still have an end. It's like you would have said "if there is an infinity of points,
how could a half-line stop ?"
Another look at this wrong logic : you think that if you had an infinity number of prior lives,
then, you must have done all things possible, in all ways possible. Then, you should be
enlighted because it's obvious that you've already done what has to be done...
But : with mathematics (again), if you take numbers between 0 and 1, and if enlightment is
taking number 1.234... You already know what I'm going to say : you can pick an infinity
number between 0 and 1 without picking 1.234... The buddha teach us to pick 1.234, and
when we do so, we become enlighted (even if we've already picked an infinity of numbers).
You see ? It is possible to take an infinity of numbers without taking 1.234. In a same way, it is
possible to live an infinity of lives without doing what has to be done.
My point is that your "logic" is not strong enought to serve a demonstration.
From a buddhist point of view, I would say that when the buddha is talking about an infinity
prior lives, nobody knows if he is talking about a great, great, great number or litterally
infinity. Furthermore, the buddha taught that that kind of questions is useless, and that's why
he doesn't explain the origination of "life" (even if he gives an explaination of origination of
THIS current life).
edit : I just re-read your post, sorry for saying "you" in my response since you're just quoting
somebody else...
Please don't hesitate to correct my english if you feel to
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by baratgab Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:02 pm
P
o
s
Collective wrote:
t
Found this interesting:
baratgab
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010
9:55 pm
Location: Hungary
Contact:
C
o
n
1. All Buddhists believe that once you have attained enlightenment--i.e. become a Buddha--you
can never go back. Attaining enlightenment changes you forever, whether you are a Mayahana
buddhist and return to the cycle of existence as a boddhisatva or as a Therevaden enter into
Nirvana and stop the cycle of rebirth.

Ribur Rinpoche, among others, this question and they either shrug their shoulders or laugh.
But nobody gives me an answer."
What do you think?
I think it's naive to assume that Buddhism is about holding beliefs regarding what we cannot
see.
I'm sure that you observed that meditation practice is pretty much about putting
down any and every speculative opinions, views and beliefs; this is the way that leads to
realization, that leads to the end of suffering. But even with a good worldly comprehension of
the dhamma, it is quite clear that the attainment of Nibbana is basically irrelevant. The reason
for this is that the path is about a direction, and not about a destination. You just hold the
direction, because you understood that it is the only reasonable direction. With every single
step you know that you get further and further away from stress, and you get nearer and
nearer to ease. Whether there is an endpoint or not... It only matters if one thinks that there
are better things to do in the case of no Nibbana, but if one's level of understanding is this,
then, well, there is truly no Nibbana for that being.
Of course there is nothing wrong with intellectual inquiry; after all this is how we came to
Buddhism. But it is important to keep in mind that regarding the Ultimate, much of our
everyday concepts lose their applicability. What was before Everything? Where is this
Everything in? How could something come into existence from nothing? These topics are so
vague that every kind of religious person uses them to ascertain the existence of a creator
god, with some strangle logic. You can go just such and such far with everyday intellect, and
then you have to put it down if you intent to pursue that direction with any success in clear
comprehension.
Speaking about fallacy, what do you think, what was the motivation of the questioner? Why he
or she proposed this question? If you follow the thread, it boils down to the realization that he
or she simply pursued his or her interest, pursued his or her contentment. In fact every single
act of every single sentient being is about pursuing contentment. Even if someone says that he
is not interested in contentment, the real meaning is that he identifies contentment with not
being interested in contentment. Remember that the Buddha said: I only teach suffering and
the end of suffering? This doesn't mean limited teaching: it means that this is the highest, this
is the essential; everything falls into this category. So, did the questioner get closer to
contentment by asking this question, and by possibly losing the Dhamma? Did he acted with
clear comprehension of his or her true motivation? Not likely. The inability to distinguish the
essential from the unessential, and the not knowing of our true motivation this is what I call
fundamental fallacy.
Edit: You might want to check out the Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta about the speculative views:

...
As he was sitting there he asked the Blessed One: "How is it, Master Gotama, does Master
Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is eternal: only this is true, anything otherwise is
worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is not eternal: only this is true, anything
otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is finite: only this is true, anything
"...no..."
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'The cosmos is infinite: only this is true, anything
"...no..."
...
"Then does Master Gotama hold the view: 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not
exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless'?"
"...no..."
"How is it, Master Gotama, when Master Gotama is asked if he holds the view 'the cosmos is
eternal...' ... 'after death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist: only this is true,
anything otherwise is worthless,' he says '...no...' in each case. Seeing what drawback, then, is
Master Gotama thus entirely dissociated from each of these ten positions?"
"Vaccha, the position that 'the cosmos is eternal' ... 'after death a Tathagata neither exists nor
does not exist: only this is true, anything otherwise is worthless' is a thicket of views, a
wilderness of views, a contortion of views, a writhing of views, a fetter of views. It is
accompanied by suffering, distress, despair, & fever, and it does not lead to disenchantment,
dispassion, cessation; to calm, direct knowledge, full Awakening, Unbinding.
"Does Master Gotama have any position at all?"
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees
is this: 'Such is form, such its origin, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origin, such
its disappearance; such is perception... such are mental fabrications... such is consciousness,
such its origin, such its disappearance.' Because of this, I say, a Tathagata with the ending,
fading out, cessation, renunciation, & relinquishment of all construings, all excogitations, all Imaking & mine-making & obsession with conceit is, through lack of clinging/sustenance,
released."
"But, Master Gotama, the monk whose mind is thus released: Where does he reappear?"
"'Reappear,' Vaccha, doesn't apply."
...
Last edited by baratgab on Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Just as in the great ocean there is but one taste the taste of salt so in this Doctrine and
Discipline there is but one taste the taste of freedom"
o
p
Re: A Problem?
P
o just not that mindful at times. After reading baratgab's reply, i realized that Collective
i am
s
was
t not writing about himself as i thought he was. Thank you, baratgab for your mindfulness
reminder.
sattva
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu May 07,
2009 10:07 pm
part of Maryland
monastery.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by acinteyyo Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:38 pm
P
o
s
Collective wrote:
t
2. All Buddhists believe that we have lived an infinite number of prior lives.
acinteyyo
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Jun 01,
2009 9:48 am
Location: Bavaria /
Germany
Where does it state that we have lived an infinite number of prior lives?
It seems to me like I'm reading some speculation based on assumptions and self-view between
those lines...
best wishes, acinteyyo
Pubbe cha bhikkhave, etarahi ca dukkhaceva papemi, dukkhassa ca nirodha. (M 22)
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by jcsuperstar Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:20 pm
P
"ifoi haven't done it yet, how can i ever do
s
applied
to pretty much anything, since in
t
it?" seems to be the question here, which could be

this life time I've never become a doctor that means
i can never be a doctor etc which isn't so much true or false but rather a question of causes
and conditions. are they right in this life time for me to become a doctor. the same goes for
awakening, are the causes and conditions right?

jcsuperstar
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Dec 31,
2008 5:15 am
Location: alaska
Contact:
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
j
c
s
u
p
e
r
s
t
appicchato a
Posts: 1603 r
Joined: Wed Dec 31,
2008 12:47 am
Location: Bridge on the
River Kwae

the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to youAjaan Suwat
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by appicchato Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:40 pm
P
o
s
jcsuperstar wrote:
t
...since in this life time I've never become a doctor that means i can never be a doctor etc which
isn't so much true or false but rather a question of causes and conditions. are they right in this
life time for me to become a doctor. the same goes for awakening, are the causes and
conditions right?
While I wouldn't disagree with the latter, I find the former patently (don't think I've ever used
the word before) false...and keeping with the simile/metaphor/analogy theme...since I've
never eaten pig tripe before that means I can never eat pig tripe...
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by David N. Snyder Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:30 pm
P
o a problem, just questions to be put aside:
Not
s
t
Ten questions to be set aside (not answered, because they are not important to the goal):
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 8811
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008
4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas,
Nevada
Contact:
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
D
a
v
i
d
1. The cosmos is eternal

2. The cosmos is not eternal
3. The cosmos is finite
4. The cosmos is infinite
5. The soul/mind/consciousness and the body are the same
6. The soul/mind/consciousness is one thing and the body another
7. After death a Tathagata exists
8. After death a Tathagata does not exist
9. After death a Tathagata both exists and does not exist
10. After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist
(from Majjhima Nikaya 63)
Notice that the Buddha never states anywhere that there are infinite lifetimes (it is just
assumed by us worldlings).
He states that a first beginning is unknowable and then there is also the truth of anatta, so I
don't think it is a problem when you consider the questions the Buddha said to put aside.
N
.
S
n

Dham.ma
Dhamma Wiki encyclopedia
Dharma Wheel forum
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Fede Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:30 pm
P
o
s
Collective wrote:
t
Fede
Posts: 1182
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008
10:33 pm
Location: The Heart of
this "Green & Pleasant
Land"...
Contact:
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
F
e
d
e
Why - having experienced Samsara, then attained Nibbana - would you ever want to go back,
anyway?
2. All Buddhists believe that we have lived an infinite number of prior lives.
Not 'all', no...'Infinite'...? I can't honestly say I have had an 'infinite' number of prior lives...
Some, yes. And due to have more? I think so...Unfortunately...
But all I can do right now, is do my best right now, to be right now....
This is because of the law of dependent origination. (. . .) ..if this is true then it must be
impossible for me to attain enlightenment, as I haven't become enlightened yet, even though I
have had an INFINITE number of lives to do so.
I thinbk you're definitely tripping over on this term 'infinite'.... I can't see that, myself. Maybe
I'm just blinkered. or maybe it's too big for my poor little head. Imponderable....
Ribur Rinpoche, among others, this question and they either shrug their shoulders or laugh. But
nobody gives me an answer."
That's because they see it's pointless to ponder. Just because they are who they are, it doesn't
mean they know everything
Shrugging shoulders and laughing is a telling response in itself though....I think.
"Samsara: The human condition's heartbreaking inability to sustain contentment." Elizabeth Gilbert,

'Eat, Pray, Love'.
Simplify: 17 into 1 WILL go: Mindfulness!
Quieta movere magna merces videbatur. (Sallust, c.86-c.35 BC)
Translation: Just to stir things up seemed a good reward in itself.
I am sooooo happy - How on earth could I be otherwise?!
http://www.armchairadvice.co.uk/relationships/forum/
o
p
meindzai
Posts: 595
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009
8:10 pm
Re: A Problem?
by meindzai Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:17 pm
P
o
Kinda
made me laugh anyway.
s
t
The question brings to mind the anthropic principal in physics. We only ask "why are we here"
because if we weren't here we wouldn't be able to ask. In Buddhist terms it means that the
only ones asking why we're not awake yet are the people who aren't awake. What does *that*
say about people who are asking this type of question?
Buddhism does not actually state that we've been around for an "infinite period of time." The
Buddha said there is "no discernable beginning." The beginning point cannot be discerned does that mean there isn't one? I think infinities result in all sorts of logical problems. In fact
I'm not sure logic can even be applied to infinities without really wierd stuff happening. This
principal is parodied quite a bit in Douglass Adams "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:"
"It is known that there is an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite
amount of space for them to be in. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore,
there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as
near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the universe
can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the universe is also zero, and
that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the product of a deranged
imagination."
The guy was a master. Anyway, it's a logic problem, not a Buddhist one. Fun to think about,
good for a laugh.
-M
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Goofaholix Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:14 pm
P
If othere is something clever about this question
s
t
Goofaholix
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sun Nov 15,
I'm missing it.
It could be that as Mendzai states the author thinks Buddhism we have had an infinate number
of lives, which is silly, saying we have had an unknown or uncountable number of former lives
would be more correct.

2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand
Other than that as jcsuperstar states the question appears to be "if i haven't done it yet, how
can i ever do it?". The answer is in the words of Nike "Just do it".
"Right effort is effort with wisdom. Because where there is wisdom, there is interest. The desire to know something is
wisdom at work. Being mindful is not difficult. But its difficult to be continuously aware. For that you need right effort. But
it does not require a great deal of energy. Its relaxed perseverance in reminding yourself to be aware. When you are
aware, wisdom unfolds naturally, and there is still more interest." - Sayadaw U Tejaniya
o
p
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009
9:21 am
Location: By the River
Thames near London.
Re: A Problem?
by Sanghamitta Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:52 am
P
o Collective, what do YOU think ?
So,
s
t
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.
Bhikku Bodhi.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by effort Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:41 am
P
o
i think
that i read somewhere your counter starts from zero after the great big ban,
s
god
t born then celestial beings... so even if you are stream enterer and your time is
after that
up(
because of the big bang ) you have to start from zero. maybe my understanding from the text
is this not what was in that!!
effort
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Aug 13,
2009 11:32 am
i just can say : 'know that there is almost no way out, just act in the way that you dont know it!
or its a joke or dont care!!'
sure the paths helps to live more peaceful but there is no guaranty about the next.
o
p
Re: A Problem?
by Collective Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:26 pm
P
o
s
Sanghamitta wrote:
t
So, Collective, what do YOU think ?
Collective
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009
8:12 am
I think very similalry to what another poster said; mainly that what's crucially important to me
right now is 'getting' there - where 'there' is, is utterly unimportant right now. And may always
be.
It's about the journey not the destination.
Thanks all for your input
o
p
Re: A Problem?
ground
by ground Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:24 am

P
o
s
Collective wrote:
t
What do you think?

Posts: 2592
Joined: Wed Nov 25,
2009 6:01 am
Collective wrote:

[i]"As a former Buddhist I have come upon a fundamental fallacy that no Buddhist (including
several high Tibetan Lamas) have never been able to answer. There are a few facts that one has
to confront first.
There is the presuposition that there is an "entity"** that does or does not do the "going back".
This is the basic fallacy (in the context of the buddhist teaching system) since it does not
comply with dependent origination of a multitude of factors/phenomena lacking a
fundamental common "essense". If we concede dynamics (of a dynamic system which is a mere
aggregation) then "going back" is very likely and phases of "steady states" are likely too.
However there may then also be a sort of "phase transition" with a permanent steady state.
**Actually the same fallacy entails the numberless "rebirth" discussions.
Collective wrote:
Why? If you concede that the prerequiste is "being taught" then it is just the event of "being
taught" that matters. And that may happen or not, sooner or later, and is dependent on the
appearance of someone who knows and teaches and others who transmit his teaching - just to
name the main parameters.
Kind regards
Display posts from previous: All posts

posts
Sort by Post
time
Post time
Post Reply
Return to Discovering Theravda

WHO IS ONLINE
Ascending
Ascending
o
p
Go
21 posts
1
2
Jump to

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine
Board index
Powered by phpBB Forum Software phpBB Limited
GZIP: Off
DhammaWheel.com is associated with DharmaWheel.net, DhammaWiki.com, and TheDhamma.com

A Problem - Dhamma Wheel

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Problem - Dhamma Wheel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Problem?

A Buddhist discussion forum on the Dhamma of the

Board index Modern Theravda Discovering Theravda

Search this topic

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

by Sanghamitta Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:29 am

are not Enlightened hardly amounts to a serious discussion point.

Buddha teach that it IS possible?

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

Who laughed the Zen monks?

very beautiful, Ben

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

that if there is infinity, then there is no end.

Found this interesting:

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

it?" seems to be the question here, which could be

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

awakening, are the causes and conditions right?

1. The cosmos is eternal

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

Found this interesting:

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

I'm missing it.

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

So, Collective, what do YOU think ?

by ground Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:24 am

What do you think?

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

Found this interesting:

Display posts from previous: All posts

Return to Discovering Theravda

A Problem? - Dhamma Wheel

Powered by phpBB Forum Software phpBB Limited

DhammaWheel.com is associated with DharmaWheel.net, DhammaWiki.com, and TheDhamma.com

You might also like