Bibliography of Reading Relating to Women in Science

J. E. Rice
last update: April 2013

Introduction
This report provides a list and/or summary of a variety of the literature relating to the Women in Science course
that I taught Sept. - Dec. 2006 and will be co-teaching Sept. - Dec. 2013.

Articles
History & Historical Figures
Women and Gender in the History of Computing, Abbate [Abb03]

Women in Science
Women in Science: Can they be Disturbing Elements? Benckert and Staberg [BS01]
Creating Sustainable Science, Schiebinger [Sch97]
The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? Ellemers
et al. [EvdHdG+ 04]
Cumulative Disadvantages in the Careers of Women Ecologists, R. Primack and V. OLeary [PO93]; Women
Ecologists Catching up in Scientific Productivity, but Only When they Join the Race, Primack and Stacy [PS97]
Doctoral Womens Learning and Identity in the Culture of Engineering: Stories as Situated Retellings, Wood [Woo05]
A Cognitive Interpretation of the Marginality and Underrepresentation of Women in Science, G. Bar-Haim and
J. M. Wilkes [BHW89]
More Than A Pipeline Problem: Labor Supply Constraints and Gender Stratification Across Academic Science
Disciplines, Kulis, Sicotte and Collins [KSC02]
Women in Science: Reminiscences and Reflections, Lonsdale [Lon70]
Women in Science: a Fair Shake? H. Etzkowitz and N. Gupta [EG06] (note: this is in part a rebuttal to
Lawrence Summers famous comments)
Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT, Bailyn [Bai03]
Feminism Confronts Technology, Wajcman [Waj91]
Women in Science, Engineering and Technology: A Review of the Issues, Bebbington [Beb02]
Faculty Turnover in CS Departments, Cohoon, Shwalb and Chen [CSC03]

 Female Graduate Students and Program Quality, Cohoon and Baylor [CB03]
Must There Be So Few? Including Women in CS (keynote speaker), Cohoon [Coh03]
The Rise and Fall, Matsui and Chilana [MC04]

Families & Science

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/parenting/
the-clock-is-ticking-female-fertility-declines-earlier-than-you-think/article4223161/,
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/
canadian-mds-consider-denying-fertility-treatments-to-obese-women/article595016/,
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/parenting/
fertility-switch-enzyme-may-lead-to-new-treatments/article557719/
gender and childrens learning (boys and girls learn differently, for example)
Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers, Rothausen-Vange, Marler
and Wright [RVMW05]
Fertility Decisions and Gender Differences in Labor Turnover, Employment, and Wages, An. Erosa and L.
Fuster and D. Restuccia [EFR02]
Motherhood and Scientific Productivity, Kyvik [Kyv90]
Child Care, Research Collaboration and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity, Kyvik and Teigen [KT96]
Striding Along the Mommy Track, M. Schweitzer and J. Stephenson [SS06]
Academic couples, Eisenkraft [Eis04a]
In a family way, Eisenkraft [Eis04b]
A delicate balance, Tamburri [Tam04]
Relation of Maternal Role Concepts to Parenting, Employment Choices, and Life Satisfaction Among Japanese
Women, Holloway et al. [HSYM06]
The Maternal Voice in the Technological Universe, Honey [Hon94]

Gender & Math/Science/Engineering

Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences in Choice of Careers in Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Wang, Eccles and Kenny [WEK13]
My Fair Physicist? Feminine Math and Science Role Models Demotivate Young Girls, Betz and Sekaquaptewa [BS12]
Enduring Influence of Stereotypical Computer Science Role Models on Womens Academic Aspirations, Cheryan,Drury
and Vichayapai [CDV13]
Science facultys subtle gender biases favor male students, Corinne A. Moss-Racusin [MRDB+ 12]; (NYTimes
online article related to this: Bias Persists for Women of Science, a Study Finds [Cha12])
A Snake in the Nest or in a Snakes Nest: What Counts as Peer Review for a Female Science Educator in a
Chemistry Department? Scantlebury [Sca02]
Discounting the Difficult: How High Math-Identified Women Respond to Stereotype Threat, Lesko and Corpus [LC06]
2

 Small interventions can cause big changes in performance: Subtle cues can greatly impact womens math
performance and persistence in male-dominated fields like engineering [Fis12]
Study shows gender bias in science is real. Heres why it matters, I. Yurkiewicz [Yur12]; Explaining the $17,000
Gender Gap in Physicians Pay, S. Yurkiewicz [Yur11]
Gender Bias 101 For Mathematicians, Laba [Lab13]
Effects of Salient Multiple Identities on Womens Performance Under Mathematics Stereotype Threat, Gresky
et al. [GELM05]
Mapping Gender Differences in Scientific Careers in Social and Bibliometric Space, Mahlck [Mah01]
Different Disciplines Require Different Motivations for Student Success, R. Breen and R. Lindsay [BL02]
Examining Gender Images, Expectations and Competence as Perceived Impediments to Personal, Academic
an Career Development, Wilgosh [Wil03]
The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for Making Gender Stick to Engineers, Faulkner [Fau00]
Leaving Careers in IT: Gender Differences in Retention, P. E. Stephan and S. G. Levin [SL05]
The Girls Creating Games Program: Strategies for Engaging Middle-School Girls in Information Technology,
Denner et al. [DWBC05]
Attracting Women to the CS Major, Tillberg and Cohoon [TC05]
Gender and Programming: Whats Going On? Carter and Jenkins [CJ99]; Gender and Programming, Carter
and Jenkins [CJ02]
Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw the Scientist Test, Chambers [Cha83]
The Draw a Scientist Test: A Different Population and a Somewhat Different Story, M. D. Thomas and T. B.
Henley and C. M. Snell [THS06]
Gender and Information Technology: Perspectives from Human Cognition Development, Miller [Mil05]
Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce, L. H. Summers [Sum05]
Intending to Stay: images of Scientists, Attitudes toward women, and gender as influences on persistence among
science and engineering majors, Wyer [Wye03]

Technology
Tech and Teens: Access and Use, J. Douglas Willms and Bradley A. Corbett [WC03]
Increasing participation of women in Free and Open Source Software, http://opensource.com/life/13/4/
increasing-foss-participation (message: outreach to women is effective in increasing female participation)
The dangers of older dads, Kingston [Kin13]
Why this couple offered their surrogate $10,000 to abort their baby, Anderssen [And13]
Samsungs Galaxy S 4 press conference slammed as shockingly sexist, Ore [Ore13]
Why I Hacked Donkey Kong for My Daughter, Mika [Mik13]
Daughter wins with Geek Dad who hacks video game gender pronouns, [Bla12]
Patriarchal Machines and Masculine Embodiment, Mellstrom [Mel02]
How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Computer and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences
in Mental Rotation Ability, Terlecki and Newcombe [TN05]
3

Statistics & Reports

The Daily: Statistics Canadas official release bulletin [sta05]
The Daily: Statistics Canadas official release bulletin [sta06]
Developing Female Engineers Research Report, K. S. H. Jensen and H. Takruri-Rizk and L. Crossley [JTRC05]
Women Working in Science, Engineering and Technology: Higher Education and Industry (A literature Review),
Jensen [Jenwn]
Developing Female Engineers (Research Report), Jensen [JTRC06]
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering (2006) [Com06]
AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators, Martha S. West and John W. Curtis [WC06]
REVIEWING APPLICANTS: Research on Bias and Assumptions [WIS]
By the numbers, a one-page overview of the status of women in high-tech positions as of 2009. Downloaded
from www.ncwit.org
The Sisters in Science Program: Teaching the Art of Inquiry, Hammrich, Richardson and Livingston [HRL00]
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Hill, Corbett and St. Rose
(AAUW) [HCR10]

General
Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Cant Count Can Hurt Us, Sprague and Massoni [SM05]
Screen Images and Concepts of Sexual Agency in Science and Social Science, Mageo and Stone [MS05]
The Context of Scientific Achievement: Sex Status, Organizational Environments, and the Timing of Publication on Scholarship Outcomes, Keith et al. [KLBJ02]
The Origins of Sex Differences in Science, Long [Lon90]
Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity, Long [Lon92]
On Decreasing Gender Differences and Attitudinal Changes, L. Miller and P. Lietz and D. Kotte [MLK02]
Is Science A Case of Wasteful Competition? H. P. van Dalen and A. Klamer [vDK05]
Competition in Science, Hagstrom [Hag74]
Competition and Social Control in Science: An Essay in Theory-Construction, Collins [Col68]
The Support-Stress Paradigm and Faculty Research Publication, Y. Neumann and E. Finaly-Neumann [NFN90]
Faculty Research Productivity: Some Moderators of Associated Stressors, R. T. Blackburn and R. J. Bentley [BB93]
The Family Responsive Workplace, Glass and Estes [GE97]
Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay, Caucutt, Guner and
Knowles [CGK02]

 Research Productivity of Graduates in Management: Effects of Academic Origin and Academic Affiliation,
Long et al. [LBBW98]
No Talent Left Behind: Attracting and Retaining a Diverse Faculty, Van Ummersen [Umm05]
Rethinking Academic Work and Workplaces, J. Gappa and A. E. Austin and A. G. Trice [GAT05]
Balancing Career and Care, Pyper [Pyp06]
Cultural Representations of Gender and Science Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films,
Steinke [Ste05]
I Cant Wait to Get Married: Gender Differences in Drive to Marry, Blakemore, Lawton and Vartanian [BLV05]
Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion for Faculty in the Humanities 197795, Ginther and Hayes [GH03]
Gender Differences in Computer Work: Evidence for the Model of Achievement-Related Choices, Dickh
auser
and Stiensmeier-Pelster [DSP02]
The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention, Clance and
Imes [Ime78]
IT, Gender and Professional Practice: Or, Why an Automated Drug Distribution System was Sent Back to
the Manufacturer, Novek [Nov02]
Managing Maternity Leave: A Qualitative Analysis of Temporary Excutive Succession, Ashcraft [Ash99]

Other Resources
Online Articles/Blogs/Webpages
Women-Related Web Sites in Science/Technology, http://userpages.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/links_sci.
html. There are a LOT of links here, and it is updated quite often.
Articles Related to Women in CS, https://wwwtest.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~wics/articles.phtml. Another list
of links from 2002 to 2012.
Feminist Frequency, http://www.feministfrequency.com/. The Tropes vs Women in Video Games project
aims to examine the plot devices and patterns most often associated with female characters in gaming from a
systemic, big picture perspective. This series will include critical analysis of many beloved games and characters,
but remember that it is both possible (and even necessary) to simultaneously enjoy media while also being
critical of its more problematic or pernicious aspects.
Gender Differences and Why They Dont Matter So Much, Hall [Hal]
http://people.virginia.edu/~jlc6j/pubs.htm, publications of Joanne McGrath Cohoon
http://www.ccwestt.org/ (excellent repository of reports, announcements, and news)
Videos
Asking Different Questions: Women in Science, G. Basen and E. Buffie [BB96]
http://www.makers.com/, a video collection of womens stories.

Books
A Practical Guide to Gender Diversity for Computer Science Faculty, by Diana Franklin [Fra13] (downloadable
at http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00495ED1V01Y201304PRO002)
Recoding Gender, by Janet Abbate. An historical and personal account of the participation of women in the
field of computing [Abb12] (owned by J. Rice)
The science education of American girls : a historical perspective, Tolley [Tol03] (in the uleth library)
Gender-technology relations : exploring stability and change [Cor12] (in the uleth library)
Philosophy of Science after Feminism [Kou10]
Motherhood, the Elephant in the Room [Mon08] A collection of short articles by women in science who have
also raised a family or considered doing so. Grouped by decade, to illustrate the differing approaches and
options.
Mama, Ph.D. [EGP08]
Women in Science: a Social and Cultural History [Wat07]. From Shelly: British; author is a historian of
education. Begins with defining science and gender, followed by a lot of history from early Greeks to modern
education, with a focus on education. Interesting title to last chapter: Asking Questions of Science: The
significance of gender and education.
Common Science?: Women, Science, and Knowledge [BB98]. A book by a biologist and a social scientist,
arguing that We are all inside science. It affects us all. (Amazon) and that feminist writing cannot afford to
stand outside of science. Available in electronic form via uleth library.
Women in Science, Gornick [Gor90]
The Psychology of Women: A Lifespan Perspective, C. A. Etaugh and J. S. Bridges [EB04]
The Science on Women in Science [?]
From amazon:
Women have achieved or exceeded parity with men in most academic fields but continue to be outnumbered in the physical sciences, engineering, and math. For many equity activists, this imbalance
constitutes a serious problem, even a crisis, necessitating federal oversight to prevent gender bias in
higher education and scientific industries. Congress, the Obama administration, and many science and
education leaders are considering dramatic measures to improve womens prospects in the sciences. But
what if claims of gender bias have been exaggerated?
In 2007, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the
Promise of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, an influential study suggesting that women face
a hostile environment in the laboratory. The NAS report dismissed the possibility that gender disparities
in scientific fields might be attributable to biological differences and called for immediate remedial action
in education, government, and business. This volume examines the research behind the NASs claims
and presents a more balanced analysis of the gender gap.
Scientific research on the relationship between gender and vocation is complex, vibrant, and full of
reasonable disagreements. Some scholars agree that discrimination is the best explanation for the current
configuration of men and women in science, but others, perhaps a majority, suggest that biology and
considered preference explain why men and women follow different career paths. The Science on Women
and Science is a lively, readable, and balanced collection of articles by distinguished scholars from sides
of an often-contentious debate.

The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and Girls [CW09]
From amazon:
Nearly half of all physicians and biologists are females, as are the majority of new psychologists,
veterinarians, and dentists, suggesting that women have achieved equality with men in the workforce.
But the ranks of professionals in math-intensive careers remain lopsidedly male; up to 93% of tenure-track
academic positions in some of the most mathematically-oriented fields are held by men.
Three main explanations have been advanced to explain the dearth of women in math-intensive careers,
and in The Mathematics of Sex, Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams describe and dissect the
evidence for each. The first explanation involves innate abilitymale brains are physiologically optimized
to perform advanced mathematical and spatial operations; the second is that social and cultural biases
inhibit females training and success in mathematical fields; the third alleges that women are less interested
in math-intensive careers than are men, preferring people-oriented pursuits. Drawing on research in
endocrinology, economics, sociology, education, genetics, and psychology to arrive at their own unique,
evidence-based conclusion, the authors argue that the problem is due to certain choices that women (but
not men) are compelled to make in our society; that women tend not to favor math-intensive careers for
certain reasons, and that sex differences in math and spatial ability cannot adequately explain the scarcity
of women in these fields. The Mathematics of Sex represents the first time such a thorough synthesis of
data has been carried out to solve the puzzle of womens underrepresentation in math-intensive careers.
The result is a readable, engaging account suitable not only for academics in an array of disciplines, but
for general readers as wellincluding educators, science policymakers, parents of daughters, and anyone
intellectually curious about a key controversy of our time.
This book is also referred to in the 2011 article Choices not discrimination determine women scientists success,
researchers say (http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Feb11/WomenSci.html).
Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology and Medicine [CLS01]
Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology and Medicine is a collection that emerged from a workshop
entitled Science, Medicine, and Technology in the Twentieth Century: What Difference Has Feminism Made?. As
such it is a collection from different authors, editted by Creager, Lunbeck and Schiebinger. Table of contents follows:
Introduction
Science
Doing Social Science as a Feminist: The Engendering of Archeology, Alison Wylie
The Paradox of Feminist Primatology: The Goddesss Discipline? Linda Marie Fedigan
Revisiting Women, Gender, and Feminism in Developmental Biology, Scott F. Gilbert & Karen A. Rader
Developing the Feminist Critique of Science, Evelyn Fox Keller
Technology
Feminism and the Rethinking of the History of Technology, Carroll Pursell
Man the Maker, Woman the Consumer: The Consumption Junction Revisited, Ruth Oldenziel
What Difference Has Feminism Made to Engineering in the Twentieth Century? Pamela E. Mack
Boys Toys and Womens Work: Feminism Engages Software, Michael S. Mahoney
Medicine, Technology, and Gender in the History of Prenatal Diagnosis, Ruth Schwartz Cowan
Medicine
On Bodies, Technologies, and Feminisms, Nelly Oudshoorn
7

 Rationality, Feminism, and Mind, Emily Martin

Gendering the Epidemic: Feminism and the Epidemic of HIV/AIDS in the United States, 1981-1999,
Evelynn M. Hammonds
Women, Science and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies [WBG+ 01]
Women, Science and Technology is a compilation of articles. I own the first edition, but apparently there is a 2nd
edition (2008) and 3rd edition now available. Table of contents (1st ed.):
Section One: High Hopes, Broken Promises, and Persistence: Educating Women for Scientific Careers
The Anomaly of a Woman in Physics, Evelyn Fox Keller
Never Meant to Survive, a Black Womans Journey: An Interview with Evelynn Hammonds, Aimee Sands
Gender Constructs and Career Commitment: The Influence of Peer Culture on Women in College, M.A.
Eisenhart and D.C. Holland
Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative on Science and the Scientific Method, Banu
Subramaniam
The Shoulders of Giants, Dana Horn
Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review, Christine Wenneras and Agnes Wold
Nine Decades, Nine Women, Ten Nobel Prizes: Gender Politics at the Apex of Science, Hilary Rose
The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: Gender Differences in Career Attainments, Harriet Zuckerman
Section Two: Science, Sex, and Stereotypes: Cultural Images of Science and Scientists

Sex, Science and Education, Janice Law Trecker

Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals, Carol Cohn
Mixed Messages: Men and Women in Advertisements in Science, Mary Barbercheck
Gender and Science: An Update, Evelyn Fox Keller

Section Three: Constructing Gender, Constructing Science: How Ideas about Women and Men Shape Science
and Technology

Science, Facts, and Feminism, Ruth Hubbard

The Medical Construction of Gender: Case Management of Intersexed Infants, Suzanne Kessler
Sociobiology, Biological Determinism and Human Behavior, Ruth Bleier
The Built Environment: Womens Place, Gendered Space, Judy Wacjman

Section Four: New Science, New Knowledge: Bringing Feminist Perspectives into Science and Technology
Studies

Can There Be A Feminist Science? Helen Longino

Socially Camouflaged Technologies: The Case of Electromechanical Vibrator, Rachel Maines
Is Primatology a Feminist Science? Lisa Marie Fedigan
Naked Sex in Exile: On the Paradox of the Sex Question in Feminism and in Science, Cynthia Kraus

Section Five: Reproducible Insights: Women Creating Knowledge, Social Policy, and Change
Premenstrual Syndrome, Work Discipline, and Anger, Emily Martin
Engendering Environmental Thinking: A Feminist Analysis of the Present Crisis, Ruth Perry
Between Fathers and Fetuses: The Social Construction of Male Reproduction and the Politics of Fetal
Harm, Cynthia R. Daniels
Feminist AI Projects and Cyberfutures, Alison Adam
8

Speaking Out [Bax06]

Speaking Out is a compilation of articles relating womens voice to their position in society. Article titles include:
Theorising the Female Voice in Public Contexts by D. Cameron,
Gaining a public voice: a historical perspective on American Womens Public Speaking by J. M. Bean,
Constructing Gender in Public arguments: the female voice as emotional voice by L. Litosseliti,
Gender and PErformance Anxiety at Academic Conferences by S. Mills,
Governed by the rules?: the female voice in parliamentary debates by S. Shaw,
Silence as morality: lecturing at a theological college by A. Jule,
gender and the genre of the braodcast political interview by C. Walsh,
trial discourse and judicial decision-making: constraining the boundaries of gendered identities by S. Ehlrich,
do we have to agree with her? how high school girls negotiate leadership in public contexts by J. Baxter and,
positioning the female voice within work and family, by S. Kendall.
Womens Studies Quarterly Vol. XXVIII [Ros00]
This journal is available as a bound book in the ULeth library. This particular volume is titled Building inclusive
science: connecting womens studies and women in science and engineering and includes the following articles (not
a complete list):
Reacing for success in science: womens uneven journey by P. M. Rayman and J. P. Stewart,
Feminism where men predominate: the history of womens science and engineering education at MIT by A.
S. Bix,
Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments
by M. F. Fox,
revisiting the gender, marriage, and parenthood puzzle in scientific careers by L. Grant, I. Kennelly and K.
B. Ward,
women in chemistry and physics: questions of similarity and difference by S. Benckert and E-M. Staberg,
The anatomy of interest: women in undergraduate computer science by J. Margolis, A. Fisher and F. Miller,
a desire to help others: goals of high-achieving female science undergraduates by P. H. Miller, S. V. Rosser,
J. P. Benigno and M. L. Zieseniss,
the feminist and the scientist: one and the same by A. B. Ginorio, T. Marshall and L. Breckenridge
Scientific, Feminist, and Personal epistemologies: conflicts and opportunities by D. M. Huges

Perspectives on Gender and Science [Har86]

This book is also a compilation of articles on the topic. I did not find it to be as useful as some, since the material
is somewhat dated (1986). However, some of the material is interesting, and a selection of the articles included is
listed below (not a complete list):
women scientists: are they really different? by A. Walton,
female engineers: femininity redefined? by P. Newton,
on being a scientist, by E. Johnson,
the masculine image of science: how much does gender really matter? by B. Easlea, and
how gender matters: or why its so hard for us to count past two, by E. F. Keller
The Gender and Science Reader [ML01]
Yet another compilation of articles on the topic. More up-to-date (2001). A(n) (in)complete list of article titles
follows:
a six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science by S. G. Brainard and L.
Carlin,
science and science criticism by R. Hubbard,
how I came to this study by B. Spanier,
from working scientist to feminist critic by E. F. Keller,
secrets of god, nature and life by E. F. Keller,
methods and values by the National Academy of Sciences,
are theire feminist methodologies appropriate for the natural sciences and do they make a difference?, by S.
V. Rosser,
is science multicultural? challenges, resources, opportunites and uncertainties by S. Harding,
heisenbergs recognitions: the end of the scientific world view by J. Lukacs,
in pursuit of difference: scientific studies of women and men by L. Birke,
from molecules to brains, normal science supports sexist beliefs about differences by B. Spanier,
toward a feminist natural science: linking theory and practice by E. A. Kerr,
structuring feminist science by M. Lederman, and
epilogue: womens work is never done by H. Rose.
Has Feminism Changed Science? [Sch01]
This is an entire book by the author, with her viewpoints (nicely backed up) on a variety of topics: she begins with a
short historical overview, then discusses meters for equity, and finishes her first section with a chapter discussing the
pipeline. She then goes on to discuss Gender in the Cultures of Science including image issues and work-family
balance issues, and finishes with discussions on Gender in the Substance of Science, including topics such as how
gender has affected the results of certain scientific areas, such as primatology, and how gender has affected the doing
and the people in various areas of science. The author is a historian of science.
10

The Racial Economy of Science [Har93]

This book did not turn out as useful as I had hoped. It is another collection of articles on the topic, with a wider
emphasis on minorities in science. Some material is dated (1993).
Women and Science [She06]
Have not yet read this title.

References
[Abb03]

Janet Abbate. Women and gender in the history of computing. IEEE Annals of the History of
Computing, pages 48, Oct.Dec. 2003.

[Abb12]

Janet Abbate. Recoding Gender. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusets, 2012.

[And13]

Erin Anderssen. Why this couple offered their surrogate $10,000 to abort their baby. The Globe
and Mail, 2013. published online at http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/
why-this-couple-offered-their-surrogate-10000-to-abort-their-baby/article9306399/.

[Ash99]

Karen Lee Ashcraft. Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary excutive succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2):240280, June 1999.

[Bai03]

L. Bailyn. Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT. Gender, Work and
Organization, 10(2):137153, Mar. 2003.

[Bax06]

J. Baxter. Speaking Out. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

[BB93]

R. T. Blackburn and R. J. Bentley. Faculty research productivity: Some moderators of associated

stressors. Research in Higher Education, 34(6):725745, Dec. 1993.

[BB96]

G. Basen and E. Buffie. Asking different questions: Women in science, 1996. (video).

[BB98]

Jean Barr and Lynda Birke. Common Science?: Women, Science, and Knowledge. Indiana University
Press, 1998.

[Beb02]

D. Bebbington. Women in science, engineering and technology: A review of the issues. Higher
Education Quarterly, 56(4):360375, Oct. 2002.

[BHW89]

G. Bar-Haim and J. M. Wilkes. A cognitive interpretation of the marginality and underrepresentation

of women in science. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(4):371387, July-Aug. 1989.

[BL02]

R. Breen and R. Lindsay. Different disciplines require different motivations for student success.
Research in Higher Education, 43(6):693725, Dec. 2002.

[Bla12]

Lukas Blakk. Daughter wins with geek dad who hacks video game gender pronouns, 2012. published
in geekfeminism.org.

[BLV05]

Judith E. Owen Blakemore, Carol A. Lawton, and Lesa Rae Vartanian. I cant wait to get married:
Gender differences in drive to marry. Sex Roles, 53(5/6):327335, Sept. 2005.

[BS01]

Sylvia Benckert and Else-Marie Staberg. Women in science: Can they be disturbing elements? NORA,
9(3):162171, 2001.

[BS12]

Diana E. Betz and Denise Sekaquaptewa. My fair physicist? feminine math and science role models
demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2012. published online at
http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/03/27/1948550612440735.
11

[CB03]

J. McGrath Cohoon and Katharine M. Baylor. Female graduate students and program quality. IEEE
Technology and Society Magazine, Fall:2835, 2003.

[CDV13]

Sapna Cheryan, Benjamin J. Drury, and Marissa Vichayapai. Enduring influence of stereotypical
computer science role models on womens academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
37(1):7279, March 2013. http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/37/1/72.

[CGK02]

Elizabeth M. Caucutt, Nezih Guner, and John Knowles. Why do women wait? matching, wage
inequality, and the incentives for fertility delay. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5:818855, 2002.

[Cha83]

D. W. Chambers. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw the scientist test. Science Education,
67(2):255265, 1983.

[Cha12]

Kenneth Chang.
Bias persists for women of science, a study finds, 2012.
published in The New York Times online edition, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/science/
bias-persists-against-women-of-science-a-study-says.html?_r=0.

[CJ99]

Janet Carter and Tony Jenkins. Gender and programming: Whats going on?
ITiCSE, pages 14, June, Cracow, Poland, 1999.

[CJ02]

Janet Carter and Tony Jenkins. Gender in programming. In Proceedings of ITiCSE, pages 188192,
2002.

[CLS01]

A. N. H. Creager, E. Lunbeck, and L. Schiebinger, editors. Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science,

Technology, and Medicine. University of Chicago Press, 2001.

[Coh03]

J. McGrath Cohoon. Must there be so few? including women in cs (keynote). In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 668674, 2003.

[Col68]

R. Collins. Competition and social control in science: An essay in theory-construction. Sociology of

Education, 41(2):123140, Spring 1968.

[Com06]

Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the
Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering (2006). National Academy Press, 2006.
downloaded from http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309100429/html.

[Cor12]

Hilde G. Corneliussen. Gender-technology relations : exploring stability and change. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

[CSC03]

J. McGrath Cohoon, Rebecca Shwalb, and Lih-Yuan Chen. Faculty turnover in cs departments. In
Proceedings of SIGCSE, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2003.

[CW09]

Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams. The Mathematics of Sex. Oxford University Press, 2009.

[DSP02]

Oliver Dickh
auser and Joachim Stiensmeier-Pelster. Gender differences in computer work: Evidence
for the model of achievement-related choices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27:486496,
2002.

[DWBC05]

J. Denner, L. Werner, S. Bean, and S. Campe. The girls creating games program: Strategies for
engaging middle-school girls in information technology. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies,
26(1):9098, 2005.

[EB04]

C. A. Etaugh and J. S. Bridges. The Psychology of Women: A Lifespan Perspective. Pearson, 2004.

[EFR02]

An. Erosa, L. Fuster, and D. Restuccia. Fertility decisions and gender differences in labor turnover,
employement, and wages. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5(4):856891, Oct. 2002.

[EG06]

H. Etzkowitz and N. Gupta. Women in science: a fair shake? Minerva, 44(2):185199, June 2006.
12

In Proceedings of

[EGP08]

Elrena Evans, Caroline Grant, and Miriam Peskowitz, editors. Mama, Ph.D.: Women Write About
Motherhood and Academic Life. Rutgers University Press, 2008.

[Eis04a]

H. Eisenkraft. Academic couples. University Affairs: Canadas Magazine on Higher Education, Nov
2004.

[Eis04b]

H. Eiskenkraft. In a family way. University Affairs: Canadas Magazine on Higher Education,

June/July 2004.

[EvdHdG+ 04] Naomi Ellemers, Henriette van den Heuvel, Dick de Gilder, Anne Maass, and Alessandra Bonvini.
The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?
British Journal of Social Psychology, 43:315338, 2004.
[Fau00]

W. Faulkner. The power and the pleasure? a research agenda for making gender stick to engineers.
Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1):87119, Winter 2000.

[Fis12]

Susan Fisk. Small interventions can cause big changes in performance, 2012. http://gender.
stanford.edu/news/2012/small-interventions-can-cause-big-changes-performance,
published by the Clayman Institute for Gender Research.

[Fra13]

Diana Franklin. A Practical Guide to Gender Diversity for Computer Science Faculty. Synthesis
Lectures on Professionalism and Career Advancement for Scientists and Engineers. 2013.

[GAT05]

J. Gappa, A. E. Austin, and A. G. Trice. Rethinking academic work and workplaces. Change: The
Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(6):3239, Nov/Dec 2005.

[GE97]

Jennifer L. Glass and Sarah Beth Estes. The family responsive workplace. Annual Review of Sociology,
23:289313, 1997.

[GELM05]

Dana M. Gresky, Laura L. Ten Eyck, Charles G. Lord, and Rusty B. McIntyre. Effects of salient multiple identities on womens performance under mathematics stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 53(9/10):703
716, Nov. 2005.

[GH03]

Donna K. Ginther and Kathy J. Hayes. Gender differences in salary and promotion for faculty in the
humanities 197795. The Journal of Human Resources, 38(1):3473, 2003.

[Gor90]

V. Gornick. Women in Science. Touchstone, 1990.

[Hag74]

W. O. Hagstrom. Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39(1):118, Feb. 1974.

[Hal]

Harriet Hall. Gender differences and why they dont matter so much. published as part of the blog
Science-Based Medicine.

[Har86]

J. Harding, editor. Perspectives on Gender and Science. The Falmer Press, 1986.

[Har93]

S. Harding. The Racial Economy of Science. Indiana University Press, 1993.

[HCR10]

Catherine Hill, Christianne Corbett, and Andresse St. Rose. Why so few? women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, 2010.

[Hon94]

Margaret Honey. The maternal voice in the technological universe. In Donna Bassin, Margaret
Honey, and Meryle Mahrer Kaplan, editors, Representations of Motherhood. Yale University Press:
New Haven, 1994.

[HRL00]

Penny L. Hammrich, M. Greer Richardson, and Beverly Livingston. The sisters in science program:
Teaching the art of inquiry. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association of
Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA, April 28May 1, 2000.

13

[HSYM06]

Susan D. Holloway, Sawako Suzuki, Yoko Yamamoto, and Jessica Dalesandro Mindnich. Relation of
maternal role concepts to parenting, employment choices, and life satisfaction among japanese women.
Sex Roles, 54(3/4):235249, Feb. 2006.

[Ime78]

Pauline Rose Clance & Suzanne Imes. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics
and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 15(3), Fall 1978.

[Jenwn]

Kathrine S. H. Jensen. Women working in science, engineering and technology: Higher education and
industry (a literature review), unknown.

[JTRC05]

K. S. H. Jensen, H. Takruri-Rizk, and L. Crossley. Developing female engineers research report, 2005.
downloaded from http://www.cse.salford.ac.uk/dfe/publications.php.

[JTRC06]

Kathrine S. H. Jensen, Haifa Takruri-Rizk, and Laura Crossley. Developing female engineers (research
report), 2006.

[Kin13]

Anne Kingston. The dangers of older dads. Macleans Magazine, pages 5861, March 2013.

[KLBJ02]

Bruce Keith, Jenny Sundra Layne, Nicholas Babchuk, and Kurt Johnson. The context of scientific
achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship
outcomes. Social Forces, 80(4):12531281, June 2002.

[Kou10]

Janet A. Kourany. Philosophy of Science after Feminism. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[KSC02]

S. Kulis, D. Sicotte, and S. Collins. More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and
gender stratification across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43(6):657691,
Dec., 2002.

[KT96]

S. Kyvik and M. Teigen. Child care, research collaboration and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(1):5471, Winter 1996.

[Kyv90]

S. Kyvik. Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20(1):149160, Feb. 1990.

[Lab13]

Izabella Laba. Gender bias 101 for mathematicians, 2013. Blog post on the Accidental Mathematician blog, http://ilaba.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/gender-bias-101-for-mathematicians/
#more-3337.

[LBBW98]

R. G. Long, W. P. Bowers, T. Barnett, and M. C. White. Research productivity of graduates in

management: Effects of academic origin and academic affiliation. The Academy of Management
Journal, 41(6):704714, Dec. 1998.

[LC06]

Alexandra C. Lesko and Jennifer Henderlong Corpus. Discounting the difficult: How high mathidentified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54(1/2):113125, Jan. 2006.

[Lon70]

K. Lonsdale. Women in science: Reminiscences and reflections. Impact of Science on Society, 20:4549,
1970.

[Lon90]

J. Scott Long. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68(4):12971316, June 1990.

[Lon92]

J. Scott Long. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1):159178,
Sept. 1992.

[Mah01]

Paula Mahlck. Mapping gender differences in scientific careers in social and bibliometric space. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(2):167190, Spring 2001.

[MC04]

Hiromi S. Matsui and Parmit K. Chilana. The rise and fall: Women and computer science. In
Proceedings of the Canadian Coalition of Women in Engineering, Science and Technology (CCWEST)
Conference, St. Catharines, Ontario, 2004.
14

[Mel02]

Ulf Mellstrom. Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Science, Technology & Human
Values, 27(4):460478, Autumn 2002.

[Mik13]

Mike Mika. Why i hacked donkey kong for my daughter, 2013. published in the online magazine
Wired.

[Mil05]

P. H. Miller. Gender and information technology: Perspectives from human cognition development.
Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 26(1):148167, 2005.

[ML01]

I. Bartsch M. Lederman. The Gender and Science Reader. Routledge, 2001.

[MLK02]

L. Miller, P. Lietz, and D. Kotte. On decreasing gender differences and attitudinal changes. Psychology,
Evolution and Gender, 4(1):6992, Apr. 2002.

[Mon08]

Emily Monosson, editor. Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory. ILR Press, 2008.

[MRDB+ 12]

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, John F. Dovidio, Victoria L. Brescoll, Mark J. Graham, and Jo Handelsman. Science facultys subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 2012.

[MS05]

Jeannette Marie Mageo and Linda Stone. Screen images and concepts of sexual agency in science and
social science. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 6(1):77104, 2005.

[NFN90]

Y. Neumann and E. Finaly-Neumann. The support-stress paradigm and faculty research publication.
The Journal of Higher Education, 61(5):565580, Sep.Oct. 1990.

[Nov02]

Joel Novek. IT, gender and professional practice: Or, why an automated drug distribution system
was sent back to the manufacturer. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(3):379403, Summer
2002.

[Ore13]

Jonathan Ore.
Samsungs galaxy s 4 press conference slammed as shockingly sexist,
2013.
published by CBC news online, http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity/2013/03/
samsungs-galaxy-s-4-press-conference-slammed-as-shockingly-sexist.html.

[PO93]

R. Primack and V. OLeary. Cumulative disadvantages in the careers of women ecologists. BioScience,
43(3):158165, Mar. 1993.

[PS97]

Richard B. Primack and Elizabeth A. Stacy. Women ecologists catching up in scientific productivity,
but only when they join the race. BioScience, 47(3):169174, Mar. 1997.

[Pyp06]

W. Pyper. Balancing career and care. Perspectives on Labour and Income (Statistics Canada), 7(11),
Nov. 2006.

[Ros00]

S. V. Rosser, editor. Womens Studies Quarterly Vol. XXVIII. The Feminist Press and The Graduate
School and University Center, CUNY, 2000.

[RVMW05]

Teresa J. Rothausen-Vange, Janet H. Marler, and Patrick M. Wright. Research productivity, gender,
family, and tenure in organization science careers. Sex Roles, 53(9/10):727738, Nov. 2005.

[Sca02]

Kathryn Scantlebury. A snake in the nest or in a snakes nest1: What counts as peer review for a
female science educator in a chemistry department? Research in Science Education, 32:157162, 2002.

[Sch97]

Londa Schiebinger. Creating sustainable science. Osiris, 2nd Series, 12: Women Gender and Science:
New Directions:201216, 1997.

[Sch01]

L. Schiebinger. Has Feminism Changed Science? First Harvard University Press, 2001.

[She06]

S. L-M. Sheffield. Women and Science. Rutgers University Press, 2006.

15

[SL05]

P. E. Stephan and S. G. Levin. Leaving careers in IT: Gender differences in retention. Journal of
Technology Transfer, 30(4):383396, Oct. 2005.

[SM05]

Joey Sprague and Kelly Massoni. Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we cant
count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53(11/12):779793, Dec. 2005.

[SS06]

M. Schweitzer and J. Stephenson. Striding along the mommy track. University Affairs: Canadas
Magazine on Higher Education, May 2006.

[sta05]

The daily: Statistics canadas official release bulletin, July 2005. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/
English/050712/d050712a.htm.

[sta06]

The daily: Statistics canadas official release bulletin, July 2006. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/
English/060719/d060719b.htm.

[Ste05]

J. Steinke. Cultural representations of gender and science portrayals of female scientists and engineers
in popular films. Science Communication, 27(1):2763, Sept. 2005.

[Sum05]

L. H. Summers. Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science & engineering workforce,
2005. downloaded from http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html.

[Tam04]

R. Tamburri. A delicate balance. University Affairs: Canadas Magazine on Higher Education,

January 2004.

[TC05]

Heather K. Tillberg and J. McGrath Cohoon. Attracting women to the CS major. Frontiers: A
journal of Women Studies. Special Gender and IT Issue, 26(1):126140, 2005.

[THS06]

M. D. Thomas, T. B. Henley, and C. M. Snell. The draw a scientist test: A different population and
a somewhat different story. College Student Journal, 40(1):140148, Mar. 2006.

[TN05]

Melissa S. Terlecki and Nora S. Newcombe. How important is the digital divide? the relation of
computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5/6):433
441, Sept. 2005.

[Tol03]

Kimberley Tolley. The science education of American girls : a historical perspective. RoutledgeFalmer,
New York, 2003.

[Umm05]

C. Van Ummersen. No talent left behind: Attracting and retaining a diverse faculty. Change: The
Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(6):2631, Nov/Dec 2005.

[vDK05]

H. P. van Dalen and A. Klamer. Is science a case of wasteful competition? Kyklos, 58(3):395414,
July 2005.

[Waj91]

J. Wajcman. Feminism Confronts Technology. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.

[Wat07]

Ruth Watts. Women in Science: a Social and Cultural History. Routledge, 2007.

[WBG+ 01]

urk, and M. Wayne, editors. Women, Science and

M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Geisman, H. Ozt
Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. Routledge, 2001.

[WC03]

J. Douglas Willms and Bradley A. Corbett. Tech and teens: Access and use. Technical report,
Statistics Canada Catalog No. 11-008, Canadian Social Trends, 2003.

[WC06]

Martha S. West and John W. Curtis. AAUP faculty gender equity indicators, 2006.

[WEK13]

Ming-Te Wang, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, and Sarah Kenny. Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
Psychological Science, 2013.
16

[Wil03]

L. Wilgosh. Examining gender images, expectations and competence as perceived impediments to

personal, academic an career development. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,
24(4):239260, Dec. 2003.

[WIS]

WISELI. Reviewing applicants: Research on bias and assumptions. document prepared by the Women
in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

[Woo05]

Shaunda Wood. Doctoral womens learning and identity in the culture of engineering: Stories as
situated retellings. In Proceedings of mit4: the work of stories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, May 6-8, 2005.

[Wye03]

M. Wyer. Intending to stay: images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender as influences
on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science
and Engineering, 9(1):116, 2003.

[Yur11]

Shara Yurkiewicz. Explaining the $17,000 gender gap in physicians pay, 2011. published online in the Bioethics Forum, http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?
id=5255&blogid=140.

[Yur12]

Ilana Yurkiewicz. Study shows gender bias in science is real. heres why it matters. Scientific American (online), 2012. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/2012/09/
23/study-shows-gender-bias-in-science-is-real-heres-why-it-matters/.

17