You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices 4547

the extended Trading Phase Date.17 The Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 Therefore, the temporary increase of the
Commission emphasizes, as it did in the which renders the proposal effective IWM position limit will revert to the
previous orders,18 that the de minimis upon filing with the Commission. The pre-split level (as provided for in
exemption does not relieve brokers and Commission is publishing this notice to connection with the Rule 904 Pilot
dealers of their best execution solicit comments on the proposed rule Program) of 250,000 contracts after
obligations under the federal securities change, as amended, from interested expiration in January 2007, or on
laws and SRO rules. persons. January 22, 2007.5
Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to The Exchange believes that a position
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s limit of 250,000 contracts is too low and
Section 11A of the Act and Rule 608(e) Statement of the Terms of Substance of
thereunder,19 that participants of the may be a deterrent to the successful
the Proposed Rule Change trading of IWM options. Importantly,
ITS Plan and their members are hereby
exempt from Section 8(d) of the ITS The Exchange proposes to amend options on IWM are 1⁄10th the size of
Plan during the period covered by this Rule 904 to exempt options on the options on the Russell 2000 Index
Order with respect to transactions in iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund (‘‘RUT’’), which have a position limit of
DIAs and SPYs that are executed at a (‘‘IWM’’) from the position and exercise 50,000 contracts.6 Traders who trade
price that is no more than three cents limits provided for under the Rule 904 IWM options to hedge positions in RUT
lower than the highest bid displayed in Pilot Program and to increase the options are likely to find a position limit
CQS and no more than three cents standard position and exercise limits for of 250,000 contracts in IWM options too
higher than the lowest offer displayed in IWM as part of a six-month pilot (‘‘IWM restrictive and insufficient to properly
CQS. This Order extends the de minimis Pilot Program’’). The text of the hedge. For example, if a trader held
exemption from February 5, 2007 proposed rule change is available at 50,000 RUT options and wanted to
through March 4, 2007. Amex, the Commission’s Public hedge that position with IWM options,
Reference Room, and www.amex.com. the trader would need—at a minimum—
By the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 500,000 IWM options to properly hedge
Nancy M. Morris, the position. Therefore, the Exchange
Secretary.
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule believes that a position limit of 250,000
[FR Doc. E7–1475 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
Change contracts is too low and may adversely
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P affect market participants’ ability to
In its filing with the Commission, provide liquidity in this product.
Amex included statements concerning Additionally, IWM options have
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE the purpose of and basis for the grown to become one of the largest
COMMISSION proposed rule change and discussed any options contracts in terms of trading
comments it received on the proposed volume. For example, the volume in
[Release No. 34–55163; File No. SR–Amex– rule change. The text of these statements options on IWM set a new single-day
2007–11] may be examined at the places specified record on June 8, 2006, when 760,803
in Item IV below. Amex has prepared contracts (120,229 calls and 640,574
Self-Regulatory Organizations; summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, puts) traded on that day. This record
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice and C below, of the most significant level volume beat the previous single-
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness aspects of such statements. day high of 727,521 contracts on May
of Proposed Rule Change and 17, 2006. Further, over the previous six
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and months, ending December 31, 2006, the
the Establishment of a Pilot Program average daily trading volume (market-
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Increasing Position and Exercise wide) of IWM options has been 300,409
Change
Limits for Options on the iShares contracts and a total of 2,444,470
Russell 2000 Index Fund 1. Purpose contracts have traded on the Exchange.
January 24, 2007. The Exchange proposes to amend As a result, the Exchange proposes
Commentary .07 to Rule 904 on a six- that options on IWM be subject to
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
month pilot basis to exempt options on position and exercise limits of 500,000
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
IWM from the Rule 904 Pilot Program. contracts on a pilot basis to run from
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Under the Rule 904 Pilot Program, the January 22, 2007 through July 22, 2007.7
notice is hereby given that on January
22, 2007, the American Stock Exchange position and exercise limits for IWM The Exchange believes that increasing
LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with would be reduced on January 22, 2007 position and exercise limits for IWM
the Securities and Exchange from 500,000 to 250,000 contracts. The options will lead to a more liquid and
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the Exchange now proposes to allow
position and exercise limits for options 5 See Amex Information Circular #05–0397.
proposed rule change as described in
on IWM to remain at 500,000 contracts 6 See Amex Rule 904C; see also Securities
Items I and II below, which Items have Exchange Act Release Nos. 45236 (January 2, 2002),
on a pilot basis, from January 22, 2007
been substantially prepared by Amex. 67 FR 1378 (January 10, 2002) (SR–Amex–2001–42)
through July 22, 2007. (increase of position and exercise limits to 300,000
On January 22, 2007, Amex submitted
In June 2005, as a result of a 2-for-1 for QQQ options); and 51043 (January 14, 2005), 70
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
stock split, the position limit for IWM FR 3402 (January 24, 2005) (SR–Amex–2005–06)
change. Amex has filed the proposal (increase of position and exercise limits for options
options was temporarily increased from
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the on Standard and Poor’s Depositary Receipts from
250,000 contracts (covering 25,000,000 75,000 to 300,000).
shares) to 500,000 contracts (covering 7 Pursuant to Rule 905, the exercise limit
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES

17 The Commission expects most trading centers

to be operating consistent with the requirements of


50,000,000 shares). At the time of the established for IWM options shall be equivalent to
split, the furthest IWM option the position limit prescribed for IWM options in
Rule 611 by the Trading Phase Date.
Commentary .07 to Rule 904. The increased
18 See supra notes 3 to 8. expiration date was January 2007. exercise limits would only be in effect during the
19 17 CFR 242.608(e).
pilot period, to run from January 22, 2007 through
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). July 22, 2007. See Amendment No. 1 to the
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). proposed rule change.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:08 Jan 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1
4548 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 20 / Wednesday, January 31, 2007 / Notices

more competitive market environment Commission may designate, it has Paper Comments
for IWM options that will benefit become effective pursuant to Section
customers interested in this product. 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and Rule 19b– • Send paper comments in triplicate
The Exchange would require that each 4(f)(6) thereunder.12 to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
member or member organization that A proposed rule change filed under Securities and Exchange Commission,
maintains a position on the same side of 19b–4(f)(6) normally may not become 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
the market in excess of 10,000 contracts operative prior to 30 days after the date 20549–1090.
in the IWM option class, for its own of filing.13 However, Rule 19b– All submissions should refer to File
account or for the account of a customer 4(f)(6)(iii) 14 permits the Commission to Number SR–Amex–2007–11. This file
report certain information.8 This data designate a shorter time if such action
number should be included on the
would include, but would not be is consistent with the protection of
limited to, the option position, whether subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
investors and the public interest. The
such position is hedged and if so, a Commission process and review your
Exchange has requested that the
description of the hedge, and if Commission waive the 30-day operative comments more efficiently, please use
applicable, the collateral used to carry delay. The Commission believes that only one method. The Commission will
the position. Exchange Registered waiving the 30-day operative delay is post all comments on the Commission’s
Options Traders and specialists would consistent with the protection of Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
continue to be exempt from this investors and the public interest rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
reporting requirement as market-maker because such waiver would permit submission, all subsequent
information can be accessed through the position and exercise limits for options amendments, all written statements
Exchange’s market surveillance systems. on IWM to remain at 500,000 option with respect to the proposed rule
In addition, the general reporting contracts for a six-month pilot period. change that are filed with the
requirement for customer accounts that For this reason, the Commission Commission, and all written
maintain a position in excess of 200 designates the proposed rule change to communications relating to the
contracts will remain at this level for be effective and operative upon filing proposed rule change between the
IWM options.9 with the Commission.15 Commission and any person, other than
2. Statutory Basis At any time within 60 days of the those that may be withheld from the
filing of such proposed rule change the public in accordance with the
The Exchange believes that the Commission may summarily abrogate provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
proposed rule change is consistent with such rule change if it appears to the available for inspection and copying in
and furthers the objectives of Section Commission that such action is the Commission’s Public Reference
6(b)(5) of the Act,10 in that it is designed necessary or appropriate in the public Room. Copies of the filing also will be
to promote just and equitable principles interest, for the protection of investors available for inspection and copying at
of trade, to remove impediments to and or otherwise in furtherance of the
perfect the mechanism of a free and the principal office of Amex. All
purposes of the Act. comments received will be posted
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect IV. Solicitation of Comments without change; the Commission does
investors and the public interest. Interested persons are invited to not edit personal identifying
submit written data, views, and information from submissions. You
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s should submit only information that
Statement on Burden on Competition arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule you wish to make available publicly. All
The Exchange does not believe that change is consistent with the Act. submissions should refer to File
the proposed rule change will impose Comments may be submitted by any of Number SR–Amex–2007–11 and should
any burden on competition that is not the following methods: be submitted on or before February 21,
necessary or appropriate in furtherance 2007.
of the purposes of the Act. Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s • Use the Commission’s Internet Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
Statement on Comments on the comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ authority.16
Proposed Rule Change Received From rules/sro.shtml); or Florence E. Harmon,
Members, Participants or Others • Send an e-mail to rule-
comments@sec.gov. Please include File Deputy Secretary.
No written comments were solicited Number SR–Amex–2007–11 on the [FR Doc. E7–1519 Filed 1–30–07; 8:45 am]
or received with respect to the proposed subject line. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
Commission Action
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory
Because the forgoing rule change does organization submit to the Commission written
not: (1) Significantly affect the notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
protection of investors or the public proposed rule change, at least five business days
interest; (2) impose any significant prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
burden on competition; and (3) become change, or such shorter time as designated by the
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES

operative for 30 days after the date of Commission. The Commission has decided to waive
the five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
this filing, or such shorter time as the 14 Id.
15 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
8 See Amex Rule 906(b). operative delay, the Commission has considered the
9 See Amex Rule 906(a). proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:08 Jan 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1

You might also like