WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE BIBLIOGRAPHY

Prepared by Barbara Monroe, Reference Librarian,

Georgetown University Law Library
December 2002

This bibliography is a thorough list of books, chapters of books, journal articles, and other
resources on the WTO dispute settlement procedure and operation. The materials are arranged in
the following sections:

I. Books and Chapters: focusing on any aspect of the dispute settlement procedures and
operation.
II. Articles: focusing on general issues, specific WTO dispute settlement cases, and
system reform.
III. Other Resources: highlights papers and web sites that have a focus on any aspect of
WTO dispute settlement.

A number of databases and other resources were consulted while preparing this bibliography.

I. BOOKS & CHAPTERS

CLAUDE BARFIELD, FREE TRADE, SOVEREIGNTY, DEMOCRACY: THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATION (Washington, D.C.: AEI Press, 2001).

JOHN G. COLLIER & VAUGHAN LOWE, THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: INSTITUTIONS
AND PROCEDURES (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).

Richard O. Cunningham & Clint N. Smith, Section 301 and Dispute Settlement in the World
Trade Organization, in THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: THE MULTILATERAL TRADE FRAMEWORK FOR
THE 21ST CENTURY AND U.S. IMPLEMENTING LEGISLATION 581 (Terence P. Stewart ed., Washington,
DC: American Bar Association, Section of International Law and Practice, 1996).

William J. Davey, The WTO Dispute Settlement System, in TRADE, ENVIRONMENT AND THE
MILLENIUM 119 (Gary P. Sampson & W. Bradnee Chambers eds., Tokyo; New York: United
Nations University Press, 1999). Also available from Columbia International Affairs Online at
http://www.ciaonet.org/bookfrm.html.

William J. Davey, WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and
Avoiding “Over-Legalization,” in NEW DIRECTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: ESSAYS IN
HONOUR OF JOHN H. JACKSON 291 (Marco Bronckers & Reinhard Quick eds., The Hague; Boston:
Kluwer Law International, 2000).

Valentina Delich, Developing Countries and the WTO Dispute Settlement System, in
DEVELOPMENT, TRADE, AND THE WTO: A HANDBOOK 71 (Bernard Hoekman et al. eds., Washington,
D.C.: World Bank, 2002).

1
DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (James Cameron & Karen Campbell eds.,
London: Cameron May, 1996).

DUE PROCESS IN WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (Philippe Ruttley et al. eds., London: Cameron May,
2001).

Florentino P. Feliciano & Peter L. H. Van den Bossche, The Dispute Settlement System of the
World Trade Organization: Institutions, Process and Practice, in PROLIFERATION OF INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS: LEGAL ISSUES 297 (Niels M. Blokker & Henry G. Schermers eds., The Hague;
Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2001).

Thomas C. Fischer, Metamorphosing the GATT: The World Trade Organization (WTO), in THE
UNITED STATES, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE "GLOBALIZATION" OF WORLD TRADE: ALLIES OR
ADVERSARIES? 201 (Westport, Conn.: Quorum, 2000).

FREE WORLD TRADE AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE RECONCILIATION OF INTERESTS AND THE REVIEW OF
THE UNDERSTANDING ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
(Antonio Pérez van Kappel & Wolfgang Heusel eds., Köln: Bundesanzeiger, 2000).

Myles S. Getlan, WTO Dispute Settlement: Issues in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law,
in THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT SPEAKS ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT 799 (New York, NY:
Practising Law Institute, 1998).

Christian Haberli, The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: Implications for Agricultural Trade
Arising from the Bananas Case, in NEGOTIATING THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL POLICIES :
AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND THE MILLENNIUM WTO ROUND 211 (Sanoussi Bilal & Pavlos Pezaros eds.,
The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000).

Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and
Surveillance, in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND THE WTO: A PRO-ACTIVE AGENDA 131 (Bernard
Hoekman & Will Martin eds, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2001).

Robert E. Hudec, The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: A Developing Country
Perspective, in DEVELOPMENT, TRADE, AND THE WTO: A HANDBOOK 81 (Bernard M. Hoekman et al.
eds., Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2002).

Robert E. Hudec, The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute
Settlement Procedure, in THE URUGUAY ROUND AND BEYOND: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ARTHUR DUNKEL
101 (Jagdish Bhagwati & Mathias Hirsch eds., Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press,
1998).

IMPROVING WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES; ISSUES AND LESSONS FROM THE PRACTICE OF OTHER
INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS (Friedl Weiss ed., London: Cameron May, 2000).

2
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW AND THE GATT/WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM (Ernst-Ulrich
Petersmann ed., London; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1997).

Yuji Iwasawa, Settlement of Disputes Concerning the WTO Agreement: Various Means Other
than Panel Procedures, in TRILATERAL PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ISSUES: RELEVANCE OF
DOMESTIC LAW AND POLICY 377 (Michael K. Young & Yuji Iwasawa eds., Irvington, N.Y.:
Transnational Publishers, 1995).

John H. Jackson, Designing and Implementing Effective Dispute Settlement Procedures: WTO
Dispute Settlement, Appraisal and Prospects, in THE WTO AS AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 161
(Anne O. Krueger ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

John H. Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO, in THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION:
CONSTITUTION AND JURISPRUDENCE 59 (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1998).

John H. Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems, in FROM GATT TO THE
WTO: THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM 67 (World Trade Organization,
The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000).

John H. Jackson, Rule Implementation and Dispute Resolution, in THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM:
LAW AND POLICY OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS 107 (2nd ed., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
1997).

John H. Jackson, The World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement, and Codes of Conduct, in
THE NEW GATT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES 63 (Susan Margaret Collins & Barry
Bosworth eds., Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1994).

John H. Jackson, WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National
Governments, in THE JURISPRUDENCE OF GATT AND THE WTO: INSIGHTS ON TREATY LAW AND
ECONOMIC RELATIONS 133 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

John H. Jackson, The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: A Preliminary Appraisal, in THE
WORLD TRADING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AHEAD 153 (Washington, DC: Institute for International
Economics, 1996).

John H. Jackson, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Misunderstanding on the Nature
of Legal Obligation, in THE JURISPRUDENCE OF GATT AND THE WTO: INSIGHTS ON TREATY LAW AND
ECONOMIC RELATIONS 162 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

B. Jansen, WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures and the European Union, in INTERNATIONAL LAW
AND THE HAGUE'S 750TH ANNIVERSARY 305 (Wybo P. Heere ed., The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press,
1999).

Bernhard Jansen, GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: An Introduction, in REMEDIES IN

INTERNATIONAL LAW: AN INSTITUTIONAL DILEMMA 151 (Malcolm Evans & Stratos Konstadinides eds.,
Oxford, England: Hart Publishing, 1998).

3
Patrick Lane, The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Crack in the Cornerstone?, in
GLOBALISATION AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LIBERALISATION: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE 144 (Martin
Richardson ed., Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub., 2000).

LAW AND PRACTICE OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (Joseph F. Dennin ed., New York: Oceana,
1995).

N. DAVID PALMETER & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS, DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION:
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999).

PIERRE PESCATORE ET AL., HANDBOOK OF WTO/GATT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (Irvington-on-Hudson,

N.Y.: Transnational Juris Publications: The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1991).

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Dispute Prevention and Dispute Settlement in the EU-US

Transatlantic Partnership, in TRANSATLANTIC GOVERNANCE IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY 73 (Mark A.
Pollack & Gregory C. Shaffer eds., Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield, 2001). On order for our
library.

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Dispute Settlement Procedures in the WTO - A View from The Hague,
in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE HAGUE'S 750TH ANNIVERSARY 297 (Wybo P. Heere ed., The Hague:
T.M.C. Asser Press, 1999).

ERNST-ULRICH PETERSMANN, THE GATT/WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM: INTERNATIONAL LAW,

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (London; Boston: Kluwer Law
International, 1997).

Amelia Porges, The New Dispute Settlement: From the GATT to the WTO, in THE COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT SPEAKS ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT 1095 (New York, NY: Practising Law
Institute, 1998).

Naoko Saiki, WTO Rules and Procedures for the Settlement of Disputes – Their Formation: A
Practitioner’s View, in TRILATERAL PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ISSUES: RELEVANCE OF
DOMESTIC LAW AND POLICY 403 (Michael K. Young & Yuji Iwasawa eds., Irvington, N.Y.:
Transnational Publishers, 1995).

Gregory C. Shaffer, The Blurring of the Intergovernmental: Public-Private Partnerships behind

US and EC Trade Claims, in TRANSATLANTIC GOVERNANCE IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY 97 (Mark A.
Pollack & Gregory C. Shaffer eds., Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield, 2001). On order for our
library.

TERENCE P STEWART & AMY S. DWYER, HANDBOOK ON WTO TRADE REMEDY DISPUTES: THE FIRST SIX
YEARS, 1995-2000 (Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, 2001).

FRANK W. SWACKER ET AL., WORLD TRADE WITHOUT BARRIERS: THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
(WTO) AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Charlottesville, Va.: Michie Butterworth, 1995).

4
Alan O. Sykes, The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement
Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?, in NEW DIRECTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL
ECONOMIC LAW: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF JOHN H. JACKSON 347 (Marco Bronckers & Reinhard Quick
eds., The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000).

Michael J. Trebilcock & Robert Howse, Dispute Settlement, in The REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL
TRADE 51 (2d ed., London; New York: Routledge, 1999).

JEFFREY WAINCYMER, WTO LITIGATION: PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF FORMAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

(London: Cameron May, 2002).

Lori Wallach & Michelle Sforza, The WTO’s Unprecedented Dispute Resolution System, in
WHOSE TRADE ORGANIZATION? CORPORATE GLOBALIZATION AND THE EROSION OF DEMOCRACY 194
(Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen, 1999).

Friedl Weiss, Third Parties in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, in REFLECTIONS ON

INTERNATIONAL LAW FROM THE LOW COUNTRIES : IN HONOUR OF PAUL DE WAART 458 (Erik Denters &
Nico Schrijver eds., The Hague, The Netherlands; Boston., Mass., USA: M. Nijhoff Publishers;
Cambridge, MA, 1998).

WTO SECRETARIAT, THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES: A COLLECTION OF THE RELEVANT
LEGAL TEXTS (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

II. ARTICLES

A. GENERAL ISSUES

Padideh Ala'i, Judicial Lobbying at the WTO: The Debate over the Use of Amicus Curiae Briefs
and the U.S. Experience, 24 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 62 (2000).

Grant D. Aldonas, Revolution in International Trade Dispute Settlements, 50 DISP. RESOL. J. 73

(1995).

Jeffrey S. Beckington, The World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Resolution in United
States—Anti-Dumping Act of 1916, 34 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L.199 (2001).

Judith H. Bello, Some Practical Observations About WTO Settlement of Intellectual Property
Disputes, 37 VA. J. INT’L L. 357 (1997).

Judith Hipler Bello, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More, 90 AM. J. INT'L
L. 416 (1996).

Jacques H.F. Bourgeous, Some Reflections on the WTO Dispute Settlement System from a
Practitioner’s Perspective, 4 J. INT'L ECON. L. 145 (2001).

5
Thomas L. Brewer, International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedures: The Evolving
Regime for Foreign Direct Investment, 26 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 633 (1995).

Marco C.E.J. Bronckers & Pierre Larouche, Telecommunications Services and the World Trade
Organization, 31 J. WORLD TRADE 5 (1997).

Marc L. Busch & Eric Reinhardt, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in
GATT/WTO Disputes, 24 FORDHAM INT'L L.J.158 (2000).

Monika Butler & Heinz Hauser, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: A First Assessment from
an Economic Perspective, 16 J.L. ECON. & ORG. 503 (2000).

Seung Wha Chang, Taming Unilateralism Under the Multilateral Trading System: Unfinished
Job in the WTO Panel Ruling on U.S. Sections 301-310 of the Trade Act of 1974, 31 LAW &
POL'Y INT'L BUS. 1151 (2000).

Chai Charmody, Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L. 307
(2002).

Steve Charnovitz, Environment and Health Under WTO Dispute Settlement, 32 INT'L LAW. 901
(1998).

Sung-joon Cho, GATT Non-Violation Issues in the WTO Framework: are they the Achilles' Heel
of the Dispute Settlement Process?, 39 HARV. INT'L L.J. 311 (1998).

Myung Hoon Choo, Dispute Settlement Mechanisms of Regional Economic Arrangements &
their Effects on the World Trade Organization, 13 TEMP. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 253 (1999).

Theofanis Christoforou, Settlement of Science-Based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A Critical

Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty, 8 N.Y.U. ENVTL. L.J.
622 (2000).

Adrian T. L. Chua, Precedent and Principles of WTO Panel Jurisprudence, 16 BERKELEY J. INT'L
L. 171 (1998).

Mark Clough, Anti-dumping and Jurisprudence of the WTO Panel and Appellate Body Reports
(1995-2001), 7 INT’L TRADE L. REG. 76 (2001).

Claudio Cocuzza & Andrea Forabosco, Are States Relinquishing their Sovereign Rights? The
GATT Dispute Settlement Process in a Globalized Economy, 4 TUL. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 161
(1996).

Thomas Cottier, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Characteristics and
Structural Implications for the European Union, 35 COMMON MKT. L. REV. 325 (1998).

6
Thomas Cottier, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: New Horizons, 92 AM. SOC’Y INT’L L.
PROC. 86 (1998).

Steven P. Croley & John H. Jackson, WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and
Deference to National Governments, 90 AM. J. INT’L L. 193 (1996).

William J. Davey, Issues of WTO Dispute Settlement, 91 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. PROC. 279 (1997).

William J. Davey & Amelia Porges, Performance of the System I: Consultations and Deterrence,
32 INT'L LAW. 695 (1998).

Whitney Debevoise, Access to Documents and Panel and Appellate Body Sessions: Practice and
Suggestions for Greater Transparency, 32 INT'L LAW. 817 (1998).

Thomas J. Dillon, Jr., The World Trade Organization: A New Legal Order for World Trade?, 16
MICH. J. INT’L L. 349 (1995).

Graeme B. Dinwoodie, The Development and Incorporation of International Norms in the

Formation of Copyright Law, 62 OHIO ST. L.J. 733 (2001).

Sigrid Dormer, Dispute Settlement and New Developments within the Framework of TRIPs – An
Interim Review, 31 INT’L REV. INDUS. PROP. & COPYRIGHT L. 1 (2000).

Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss & Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Two Achievements of the Uruguay Round:
Putting TRIPS and Dispute Settlement Together, 37 VA. J. INT’L L. 275 (1997).

Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal
Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 36 J. WORLD
TRADE 605 (2002).

Peter D. Ehrenhaft, The Role of Lawyers in the World Trade Organization, 34 VAND. J.
TRANSNAT'L L. 963 (2001).

Jose Felgueroso, TRIPS and the Dispute Settlement Understanding: The First Six Years, 30
AIPLA Q.J. 165 (2002).

Sara M. Ford, Compulsory Licensing Provisions under the TRIPS Agreement: Balancing Pills
and Patents, 15 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. 941 (2000).

David A. Gantz, Dispute Settlement under the NAFTA and the WTO: Choice of Forum
Opportunities and Risks for the NAFTA Parties, 14 AM. U. INT’L L. REV. 1025 (1999).

Matthijs Geuze & Hannu Wager, WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the TRIPS
Agreement, 2 J. INT'L ECON. L. 347 (1999).

7
Gavin Goh & Trudy Witbreuk, An Introduction to the WTO Dispute Settlement System, 30 U.W.
Austl. L. Rev. 51 (2001).

Andrew T. Guzman, The Cost of Credibility: Explaining Resistance to Interstate Dispute

Resolution Mechanisms, 31 J. LEGAL STUD. 303 (2002).

Andrew Guzman & Beth A. Simmons. To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of

Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organiztion. 31 J. LEGAL STUD. S205 (2002).

C. Michael Hathaway, Commentary on “The Appellate Body,” 31 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 697
(2000).

Andrew D. Herman, The WTO Dispute Settlement Review Commission: An Unwise Extension of
Extrajudicial Roles, 47 HASTINGS L.J. 1635 (1996).

Duncan B. Hollis, Private Actors in Public International Law: Amicus Curiae and the Case for
the Retention of State Sovereignty, 25 B.C. INT’L & COMP. L. REV. 235 (2002).

Gary N. Horlick, The Consultation Phase of WTO Dispute Resolution: A Private Practitioner’s
View, 32 INT’L LAW. 685 (1998).

Gary N. Horlick, Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Will the United States Play by the Rules?, 29 J.
WORLD TRADE 163 (1995).

Gary N. Horlick, WTO Dispute Settlement and the Dole Commission, 29 J. WORLD TRADE 45
(1995).

Gary N. Horlick & Glenn R. Butterton, A Problem of Process in WTO Jurisprudence:

Identifying Disputed Issues in Panels and Consultations, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 573 (2000).

Robert E. Hudec, The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three
Years, 8 MINN. J. GLOBAL TRADE 1 (1999).

Yuji Iwasawa, WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L. 287 (2002).

John H. Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems, 1 J. INT’L ECON. L. 329
(1998).

Konstantin J. Joergens, True Appellate Procedure or Only a Two Stage Process? A

Comparative View of the Appellate Body under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, 30
LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 193 (1999).

Constance Kann, Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement System – A Sneak Preview?, 4 INT’L
TRADE L. REG. 151 (1998).

8
Jason Kearns & Steve Charnovitz, Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO: A Review of DSU
Article 21.5, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L. 331 (2002).

Azar M. Khansari, Searching for the Perfect Solution: International Dispute Resolution and the
New World Trade Organization, 20 HASTINGS INT’L & COMP. L.REV. 183 (1996).

Hyun Chong Kim, The WTO Dispute Settlement Process: A Primer, 2 J. INT'L ECON. L. 457
(1999).

Norio Komuro, The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Coverage and Procedures of the WTO
Understanding, 12 J. INT’L. ARB. 81 (1995).

Qingjiang Kong, Can the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Resolve Trade Disputes Between
China and Taiwan?, 5 J. INT'L ECON. L. 747 (2002).

Pieter Jan Kuijper, The New WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Impact on the European
Community, 29 J. WORLD TRADE 49 (1995).

Trevor Lawson, WTO Dispute Resolution: The Promotion of Diplomacy Within an Adjudicative
Model, 6 DALHOUSIE J. LEGAL STUD. 321 (1997).

Wang Lei, Some Observations on the Dispute Settlement System in the World Trade
Organization, 29 J. WORLD TRADE 173 (1995).

Peter Lichtenbaum, Dispute Settlement and Institutional Issues, 3 J. INT'L ECON. L. 173 (2000).

Peter Lichtenbaum, Procedural Issues in WTO Dispute Resolution, 19 MICH. J. INT’L L. 1195
(1998).

Martin Lukas, The Role of Private Parties in the Enforcement of the Uruguay Round Agreement,
29 J. WORLD TRADE 181 (1995).

Gabrielle Marceau, NAFTA and WTO Dispute Settlement Rules: A Thematic Comparison, 31 J.
WORLD TRADE 25 (1997).

Gabrielle Marceau, Rules on Ethics for the New World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement
Mechanism – The Rules of Conduct for the Understanding on the Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes, 32 J. WORLD TRADE 57 (1998).

Gabrielle Marceau & Matthew Stilwell, Practical Suggestions for Amicus Curiae Briefs before
WTO Adjudicating Bodies, 4 J. INT'L ECON. L. 155 (2001).

Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha, Representation of Parties in World Trade Disputes, 31 J. WORLD

TRADE 83 (1997).

9
Scott McBride, Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Backbone of the Global Trading System or
Delegation of Awesome Power?, 32 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 643 (2001).

Kevin M. McDonald, The Unilateral Undermining of Conventional International Trade Law via
Section 301, 7 J. INT’L L. & PRAC. 395 (1998).

Pierre Monnier, The Time to Comply with an Adverse WTO Ruling: Promptness within Reason,
35 J. WORLD TRADE 825 (2001).

Victor Mosoti, In our Own Image, Not Theirs: Damages as an Antidote to the Remedial
Deficiencies in the WTO Dispute Settlement Process; A View of Sub-Saharan Africa, 19 B.U.
INT'L L.J. 231 (2001).

Mark L. Movsesian, Sovereignty, Compliance, and the World Trade Organization: Lessons from
the History of Supreme Court Review, 20 MICH. J. INT'L L. 775 (1999).

Philip M. Nichols, Participation of Nongovernmental Parties in the World Trade Organization:

Extension of Standing in World Trade Organization Disputes to Nongovernment Third Parties,
17 U. PA. J. INT'L ECON. L. 295 (1996).

Philip M. Nichols, Two Snowflakes are Alike: Assumptions Made in the Debate over Standing
before the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Boards, 24 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 427
(2000).

Francisco Orrego Vicuña, Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the International Arena: The Roles
of Arbitration and Mediation, 57 DISP. RESOL. J. 64 (2002).

Young Duk Park, WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2001: A Statistical Analysis, 5 J. INT'L ECON. L.
221 (2002).

David Palmeter, National Sovereignty and the World Trade Organization, 2 J. WORLD INTELL.
PROP. 77 (1999).

C. Christopher Parlin, Operation of Consultations, Deterrence, and Mediation, 31 LAW & POL'Y
INT'L BUS. 565 (2000).

Joost Pauwelyn, Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Bears the
Burden?, 1 J. INT’L ECON. L. 227 (1998).

Joost Pauwelyn, The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement, 51 INT’L & COMP. L.Q. 325
(2002).

Joost Pauwelyn, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied
in the First Three SPS Disputes: EC - Hormones, Australia - Salmon and Japan – Varietals, 2 J.
INT'L ECON. L. 641 (1999).

10
Jessica C. Pearlman, Participation by Private Counsel in World Trade Organization Dispute
Settlement Proceedings, 30 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 399 (1999).

Shin-yi Peng, The WTO Legalistic Approach and East Asia: From the Legal Culture
Perspective, 1 ASIAN-PAC. L. & POL'Y J. 13 (2000).

Antonio F. Perez, The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate Between Private and
Public Law Solutions, 19 BERKELEY J. INT'L L. 44 (2001).

Jose Luis Perez Gabilondo, Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, 35
J. WORLD TRADE 483 (2001).

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Prevention and Settlement of International Trade Disputes Between

the European Union and the United States, 8 TUL. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 233 (2000).

Ryszard Piotrowicz & Michael Lennard, WTO and the Immersion of Trade Policy Instruments in
the Legal Mainstream, 71 AUSTRALIAN L. J. 339 (1997).

Mari Presley, Sovereignty and Delegation Issues Regarding U.S. Commitment to the World
Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Process, 8 J. TRANSNAT’L L. & POL’Y 173 (1998).

Susana Hernandez Puente, Section 301 and the New WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, 2
ILSA J. INT’L & COMP. L. 213 (1995).

Viji Rangaswami, Operation of the Appellate Process and Functions, Including the Appellate
Body, 31 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 701 (2000).

Patrick C. Reed, Process, Compliance and Implementation Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement, 91
AM. SOC’Y INT’L L. PROC. 277 (1997).

W. Michael Reisman & Mark Wiedman, Contextual Imperatives of Dispute Resolution

Mechanisms; Some Hypotheses and Their Applications in the Uruguay Round and NAFTA, 29 J.
WORLD TRADE 5 (1995).

Curtis R. Reitz, Enforcement of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 17 U. PA. J. INT'L
ECON. L. 555 (1996).

Kim Rubenstein & Jenny Schultz, Bringing Law and Order to International Trade:
Administrative Law Principles and the GATT/WTO, 11 ST. JOHN’S J. LEGAL COMMENT. 271 (1996).

Philip Ruttley, The WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism, 2 AMICUS CURIAE 4 (1997).

Matthew Schaefer, National Review of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: In the Name of
Sovereignty or Enhanced WTO Rule Compliance?, 11 ST. JOHN’S J. LEGAL COMMENT. 307 (1996).

11
Matthew Schaefer, Section 301 and the World Trade Organization: A Largely Peaceful
Coexistence to Date, 1 J. INT'L ECON. L. 156 (1998).

Christian Schede, The Strengthening of the Multilateral System: Article 23 of the WTO Dispute
Settlement Understanding: Dismantling Unilateral Retaliation under Section 301 of the 1974
Trade Act?, 20 WORLD COMPETITION 109 (1996).

Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Unfriendly Actions: The Amicus Brief Battle at the WTO, 7 WIDENER
L. SYMP. J. 87 (2001).

Warren F. Schwartz & Alan O. Sykes, The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute
Resolution in the WTO/GATT System, 30 J. LEGAL STUD. S179 (2002).

Ruchard G. Shell, Trade Legalism and International Relations Theory: An Analysis of the World
Trade Organization, 44 DUKE L.J. 829 (1995).

Andrew W. Shoyer, The Future of WTO Dispute Settlement, 92 AM. SOC’Y INT’L L. PROC. 75
(1998).

Andrew W. Shoyer & Eric M. Solovy, The Process and Procedure of Litigating at the World
Trade Organization: A Review of the Work of the Appellate Body, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 77
(2000).

Deborah E. Siegel, Legal Aspects of the IMF/WTO Relationship: The Fund’s Articles of
Agreement and the WTO Agreements, 96 AM. J. INT'L L. 561 (2002).

Anna Beth Snoderly, Clearing the Air: Environmental Regulation, Dispute Resolution, and
Domestic Sovereignty under the World Trade Organization, 22 N.C. J. INT'L L. & COM. REG. 241
(1996).

Patrick Specht, The Dispute Settlement Systems of WTO and NAFTA: Analysis and Comparison,
27 GA. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 57 (1998).

Jonathan C. Spierer, Dispute Settlement Understanding: Developing a Firm Foundation for

Implementation of the World Trade Organization, 22 SUFFOLK TRANSNAT’L L. REV. 63 (1998).

William R. Sprance, The World Trade Organization and United States' Sovereignty: The
Political and Procedural Realities of the System, 13 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. 1225 (1998).

Debra P. Steger, WTO Dispute Settlement: Revitalization of Multilateralism after the Uruguay
Round, 9 LEIDEN J. INT’L L. 319 (1996).

Debra P. Steger & Susan M. Hainsworth, World Trade Organisation Dispute Resolution
Settlement: The First Three Years, 1 J. INT'L ECON. L. 199 (1998).

12
Debra P. Steger & Peter Van den Bossche, WTO Dispute Settlement: Emerging Practice and
Procedure, 92 AM. SOC’Y INT’L L. PROC. 79 (1998).

Kendall Stiles, The New WTO Regime: The Victory of Pragmatism, 4 J. INT'L L. & PRAC. 3
(1995).

Terence P. Stewart & Mara M. Burr, The WTO Panel Process: An Evaluation of the First Three
Years, 32 INT'L LAW. 709 (1998).

Terence P. Stewart & Mara M. Burr, The WTO’s First Two and a Half Years of Dispute
Resolution, 23 N.C. J. INT’L L. & COM. REG 481 (1998).

Terence P. Stewart & Amy Ann Karpel, Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding:
Operation of Panels, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 593 (2000).

Frank W. Swacker et al., The World Trade Organization (WTO) and Dispute Resolution, 55 DISP.
RESOL. J. 35 (2000).

Christopher Thomas, Litigation Process under the GATT Dispute Settlement System: Lessons for
the World Trade Organization?, 30 J. WORLD TRADE 53 (1996).

Christopher T. Timura, Cross-Examining Expertise in the WTO Dispute Settlement Process, 23

MICH. J. INT'L L. 709 (2002).

Georg C. Umbricht, An ‘Amicus Curiae Brief’ on Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO, 4 J. INT’L
ECON. L. 773 (2001).

Kim Van der Borght, The Review of the WTO Understanding on Dispute Settlement: Some
Reflections on the Current Debate, 14 AM. U. INT'L L. REV. 1223 (1999).

Rien Van Oeveren & Jan Kuilwijk, World Trade Organisation: Using the Complaints Procedure
to Lower Trade Barriers, 3 EUR. COUNS. 39 (1998).

Edwin A. Vermulst, The Functioning of the Appellate Body after Four Years: Towards Rule
Integrity, 33 J. WORLD TRADE 1 (1999).

Edwin A. Vermulst & Bart Driessen, An Overview of the WTO Dispute Settlement System and its
Relationship with the Uruguay Round Agreement, 29 J. WORLD TRADE 131 (1995).

Santiago M. Villalpando, Attribution of Conduct to the State: How the Rules of State
Responsibility May be Applied within the WTO Dispute Settlement System, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L.
393 (2002).

Philip A. Wareham, The New WTO Dispute Resolution Procedure, 1 INT’L TRADE L. REG. 114
(1995).

13
Jeffrey Waincymer, Transparency of Dispute Settlement Within the World Trade Organization,
24 MELB. U. L. REV. 797 (2000).

Olin L. Wethington, Commentary of the Consultation Mechanism under the WTO Dispute
Settlement Understanding During Its First Five Years, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 583 (2000).

Carrie Wofford, Greener Future at the WTO: The Refinement of WTO Jurisprudence on
Environmental Exceptions to GATT, 24 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 563 (2000).

Jane I. Yoon, The World Trade Organization: Environmental Police?, 9 CARDOZO J. INT'L &
COMP. L. 201 (2001).

Michael K. Young, Dispute Resolution in the Uruguay Round: Lawyers Triumph over
Diplomats, 29 INT'L LAW. 389 (1995).

Werner Zdouc, WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the GATS, 2 J. INT’L. ECON. L. 295
(1999).

Georgios I. Zekos, An Examination of GATT/WTO Arbitration Procedures, 54 DISP. RESOL. J. 72

(1999).

B. SPECIFIC WTO DS CASES

Arthur E. Appleton, Shrimp/Turtle: Untangling the Nets, 2 J. INT'L ECON. L. 477 (1999).

Zsolt K. Bessko, Going Bananas over EEC Preferences? A Look at the Banana Trade War and
the WTO’s Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, 28
CASE W. RES. J. INT’L L. 265 (1996).

Andrew S. Bishop, The Second Legal Revolution in International Trade Law: Ecuador Goes
Ape in Banana Trade War with European Union, 12 INT’L LEGAL PERSP. 1 (2001).

Jacques H.J. Bourgeois, WTO Dispute Settlement in the Field of Anti-Dumping Law, 1 J. INT'L
ECON. L. 259 (1998).

Benjamin L. Brimeyer, Bananas, Beef, and Compliance in the World Trade Organization: The
Inability of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process to Achieve Compliance from Superpower
Nations, 10 MINN. J. GLOBAL TRADE 133 (2001).

Sydney M. Cone, III, The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade
Organization: The Uneasy Relationship between Panels and the Appellate Body, 23 MICH. J.
INT'L L. 103 (2001).

14
Hiroyuki Fujii, The Kodak-Fuji Dispute: A Spectrum of Divergent Colors and a Blueprint for a
New WTO Procedure for Disputes Involving Government Toleration of Anti-Competitive
Practices, 2 UCLA J. INT’L L. & FOREIGN AFF. 317 (1997).

Mark Furse, Competition Law and the WTO Report: 'Japan - Measures Affecting Consumer
Photographic Film and Paper,' 20 EUR. COMPETITION L. REV. 9 (1999).

Layla Hughes, Limiting the Jurisdiction of Dispute Settlement Panels: The WTO Appellate Body
Beef Hormone Decision, 10 GEO. INT'L ENVTL. L. Rev. 915 (1998).

John H. Jackson & Patricio Grane, The Saga Continues: An Update on the Banana Dispute and
its Procedural Offspring, 4 J. INT’L ECON. L. 581 (2001).

Aisha L. Joseph, The Banana Split: Has the Stalemate Been Broken in the WTO Banana
Dispute? The Global Trade Community’s ‘A-Peel’ for Justice, 24 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 744 (2000).

John Linarelli, The Role of Dispute Settlement in World Trade Law: Some Lessons from the
Kodak-Fuji Dispute, 31 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 263 (2000).

Peter C. Maki, Interpreting GATT Using the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A
Method to Increase the Legitimacy of the Dispute Settlement System, 9 MINN. J. GLOBAL TRADE
343 (2000).

Petros C. Mavroidis, Essay, Dispute Settlement Procedures and Mechanisms, 16 ARIZ. J. INT’L &
COMP. L. 255 (1999).

Gustavo Nogueira, The First WTO Appellate Body Review: United States – Standards for
Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, 30 J. WORLD TRADE 5 (1996).

Erin N. Palmer, The World Trade Organization Slips Up: A Critique of the World Trade
Organization's Dispute Settlement Understanding through the European Union Banana Dispute.
69 TENN. L. REV. 443 (2002).

Asif H. Qureshi, Extraterritorial Shrimps, NGOs and the WTO Appellate Body, 48 INT’L & COMP.
L.Q. 199 (1999).

Sylvia A. Rhodes, The Article 21.5/22 Problem: Clarification through Bilateral Agreements?, 3
J. INT'L ECON. L. 553 (2000).

Mauricio Salas & John H. Jackson, Procedural Overview of the WTO EC-Banana Dispute, 3 J.
INT’L ECON. L. 145 (2000).

William E. Scanlan, A Test Case for the New World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement
Understanding: The Japan-United States Auto Parts Dispute, 45 U. KAN. L. REV. 591 (1997).

15
Nancy E. Scott, The WTO Appellate Body and the US-Venezuela Gasoline Dispute, 2 INT’L TRADE
L. REG. 103 (1996).

Maury D. Shenk, WTO Dispute Settlement Body - Article XX Environmental Exceptions to

GATT - National Treatment - Consistency with GATT of U.S. Rules Regarding Imports of
Reformulated Gasoline, 90 AM. J. INT'L L. 669 (1996).

Benjamin Simmons, In Search of Balance: An Analysis of the WTO Shrimp/Turtle Appellate

Body Report, 24 COLUM. J. ENVTL. L. 413 (1999).

Marco M. Slotboom, The Hormones Case: An Increased Risk of Illegality of Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures, 36 COMMON MKT. L. REV. 471 (1999).

Jeffrey Waincymer, Reformulated Gasoline under Reformulated WTO Dispute Settlement

Procedures: Pulling Pandora Out of a Chapeau?, 18 MICH. J. INT’L L. 141 (1996).

Michelle Williams, Caribbean Shiprider Agreements: Sunk by Banana Trade War?, 31 U. MIAMI
INTER-AM. L. REV. 163 (2000).

David A. Yocis, Hardened Positions: Guatemala Cement and WTO Review of National
Antidumping Determinations, 76 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1259 (2001).

Geert A. Zonnekeyn, The Appellate Body’s Communication in Amicus Curiae Briefs in the
Asbestos Case – An Echternach Procession?, 35 J. WORLD TRADE 553 (2001).

C. SYSTEM REFORM

Claude Barfield, WTO Dispute Settlement System in Need of Change, 37 INTERECONOMICS 131
(2002).

Judith Hippler Bello, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More, 90 AM. J. INT’L
L. 416 (1996).

Raj Bhala, The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law (Part One of a Trilogy),
14 AM. U. INT’L L. REV. 845 (1999).

Raj Bhala, The Power of the Past: Towards de Jure Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part
Three of a Triology), 33 GEO. WASH. INT'L L. REV. 873 (2001).

Raj Bhala, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Two of a
Trilogy), 9 J. TRANSNAT’L L. & POL’Y 1 (1999).

Mark Clough, The WTO Dispute Settlement System—A Practitioner Perspective, 24 FORDHAM
INT'L L.J. 52 (2000).

16
Jeffrey Dunoff, The Death of the Trade Regime, 10 EUR. J. INT’L L. 733 (1999).

Sean P. Feeney, The Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO Agreement: An Inadequate
Mechanism for the Resolution of International Trade Disputes, 2 PEPP. DISP. RESOL. L.J. 99
(2002).

Mary E. Footer, Developing Country Practice in the Matter of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35 J.
WORLD TRADE 55 (2001).

John P. Gaffney, Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural
Justice in the Dispute Settlement System, 14 AM. U. INT’L L. REV. 1173 (1999).

Carol B. Gleason & Pamela D. Walther, The WTO Dispute Settlement Implementation
Procedures: A System in Need of Reform, 31 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 709 (2000).

James C. Hecht, Operation of WTO Dispute Settlement Panels: Assessing Proposals for Reform,
31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 657 (2000).

Gary N. Horlick, The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Compliance with WTO Rulings and
other Procedural Problems, 4 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 287 (2001).

John Kingery, Commentary: Operation of Dispute Settlement Panels, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS.
665 (2000).

Kofi Oteng Kufuor, From the GATT to the WTO: The Developing Countries and the Reform of
the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes, 31 J. WORLD TRADE 117
(1997).

Pretty Elizabeth Kuruvila, Developing Countries and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement
Mechanism, 31 J. WORLD TRADE 171 (1997).

Pieter Jan Kuyper, Remedies and Retaliation in the WTO: Are They Likely to be Effective? The
State Perspective and the Company Perspective, 91 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. PROC. 282 (1997).

Michael Laidhold, Private Party Access to the WTO: Do Recent Developments in International
Trade Dispute Resolution Really Give Private Organizations a Voice in the WTO?, 12
TRANSNAT’L LAW. 427 (1999).

Nikolaos Lavranos, Some Proposals for a Fundamental DSU Reform, 29 LEGAL ISSUES
EUR.INTEGRATION 73 (2002).

Uri Litvak, Regional Integration and the Dispute Resolution System of the World Trade
Organization after the Uruguay Round: A Proposal for the Future, 26 U. MIAMI INTER-AM L.
REV. 561 (1995).

17
Robert M. MacLean, The Urgent Need to Reform the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Process, 8 INT’L
TRADE L.REG. 137 (2002).

Petros C. Mavroidis et al., Is the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Responsive to the Needs
of the Traders?, Would a System of Direct Action by Private Parties Yield Better Results?, 32 J.
WORLD TRADE 147 (1998).

C. Christopher Parlin, WTO Dispute Settlement: Are Sufficient Resources Being Devoted to
Enable the System to Function Effectively?, 32 INT’L LAW. 863 (1998).

Joost Pauwelyn, Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a
More Collective Approach, 94 AM. J. INT’L L. 335 (2000).

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Dispute Settlement in International Economic Law--Lessons for

Strengthening International Dispute Settlement in Non-Economic Areas, 2 J. INT'L ECON. L. 189
(1999).

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, From the Hobbesian International Law of Coexistence to Modern

Integration Law: The WTO Dispute Settlement System, 1 J. INT’L ECON. L. 175 (1998).

John A. Ragosta, Unmasking the WTO--Access to the DSB System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up
to the Moniker "World Trade Court"?, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 739 (2000).

Timothy M. Reif & Marjorie Florestal, Revenge of the Push-Me, Pull-You: The Implementation
Process under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, 32 INT’L LAW. 755 (1998).

Glen T. Schleyer, Power to the People: Allowing Private Parties to Raise Claims Before the
WTO Dispute Resolution System, 65 FORDHAM L. REV. 2275 (1997).

Thomas J. Schoenbaum, WTO Dispute Settlement: Praise and Suggestions for Reform, 47 INT’L
& COMP. L.Q. 647 (1998).

David M. Schwarz, WTO Dispute Resolution Panels: Failing to Protect Against Conflicts of
Interest, 10 AM. U. J. INT’L L. & POL’Y 955 (1995).

Faryar Shirzad, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Prospects for Reform, 31 LAW & POL’Y
INT’L BUS. 769 (2000).

Andrew W. Shoyer, The First Three Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Observations and
Suggestions, 1 J. INT’L ECON. L. 277 (1998).

Aubry D. Smith, Executive-Branch Rulemaking and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade
Organization: A Proposal to Increase Public Participation, 94 MICH. L. REV. 1267 (1996).

18
Terence P. Stewart et al., Opportunities in the WTO for Increased Liberalization of Goods:
Making Sure the Rules Work for All and that Special Needs are Addressed, 24 FORDHAM INT'L L.J.
652 (2000).

C. O'Neal Taylor, The Limits of Economic Power: Section 301 and the World Trade
Organization Dispute Settlement System, 30 VAND. J. TRANSNAT’L L. 209 (1997).

J. Christopher Thomas, The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings, 31 J. WORLD TRADE 45
(1997).

Michael Patrick Tkacik, Post-Uruguay Round GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement: Substance,

Strengths, Weaknesses, and Causes for Concern, 9 INT’L LEGAL PERSP. 169 (1997).

Lori Wallach, Transparency in WTO Dispute Resolution, 31 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 773 (2000).

S. Bruce Wilson, Can the WTO Dispute Settlement Body be a Judicial Tribunal Rather than a
Diplomatic Club?, 31 LAW & POL’Y INT’L BUS. 779 (2000).

Alan Wm. Wolff, Problems with WTO Dispute Settlement, 2 CHI. J. INT'L L. 417 (2001).

Alan Wm. Wolff, Reflections on WTO Dispute Settlement, 32 INT’L LAW. 951 (1998).

II. OTHER RESOURCES

A. PAPERS

Chad P. Bown, The Economics of Trade Disputes, the GATT's Article XXIII and the WTO's
Dispute Settlement Understanding, Brandeis University, January 2002, available at
http://people.brandeis.edu/~cbown/papers/dispute.pdf.

Marc Busch, Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT, Harvard
University, October 1999, available at http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/cidtrade/Issues/busch.pdf.

Steve Charnovitz, WTO Dispute Settlement as a Model for International Governance, December
10, 2001, paper available from the Global Environment & Trade Study Library,
http://www.gets.org/library/listcontent.cfm (under the topic “dispute settlement”).

Beatrice Chaytor, Reform of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism for Sustainable
Development, World Wildlife Federation International, July 1999, available at
http://www.panda.org/resources/programmes/trade/cacdsureview.pdf.

Philip De Keyser, Exploring WTO Dispute Settlement in US Anti-Dumping Act of 1916: An Easy
Case?, 2001, Jean Monnet Center, New York University School of Law, available at
http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/013101.html.

19
Daniel Drache et al., WTO Dispute Settlement Report Card, Robards Centre for Canadian
Studies, York University, Toronto, July 2000, available at
http://www.robarts.yorku.ca/pdf/wto_dispute_report.pdf.

Geoffrey Garrett & James Smith, The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement, Yale University,
September 1999, available at http://www.yale.edu/leitner/pdf/1999-05.pdf.

Daniel T. Griswold, Seattle and Beyond: A WTO Agenda for the New Millennium, The Cato
Institute, November 4, 1999, available at http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/pas/tpa-008.pdf.

Henrik Horn & Petros Mavroidis, Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and
Developing Country Interests, World Bank. April 1999, available at
http://www1.worldbank.org/wbiep/trade/papers_2000/BPdisput.PDF.

Henrik Horn & Alexander Roitinger, A Renegotiation Perspective on Transatlantic Trade

Disputes, University of St. Gallen, April 2002, available at
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=333200 - Paper Download.

Robert Hudec, Does the Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Disputes After the
Uruguay Round, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, April 1998, available at
http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=1154&ftype=.pdf.

John Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO, Paper presented at Center for
International Development at Harvard University, November 1999, available at
http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/Trade_Workshop/jackson.pdf.

John H. Jackson, The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism,
Brookings Trade Forum, April 2000, available at
http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/btf/2000.1jackson.pdf.

Petros C. Mavroidis, Amicus Curiae Briefs Before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, 2001,
Jean Monnet Center, New York University School of Law, available at
http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/01/010201.html.

Chakravarthi Raghavan, The World Trade Organization and its Dispute Settlement System:
Tilting the Balance against the South, Third World Network, [2000], available at
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/tilting.htm.

South Centre, Issues Regarding the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, February
1999, available at http://www.southcentre.org/publications/trade/dispute.pdf.

Joel P. Trachtman, The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution, February 11, 1999, available at
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/delivery.cfm/99021119.pdf?abstractid=149348 (GULC only).

United States General Accounting Office, World Trade Organization: Issues in Dispute
Settlement, August 2000, available at http://www.gao.gov/archive/2000/ns00210.pdf.

20
J.H.H. Weiler, The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and
External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 2000, Jean Monnet Center, New York
University School of Law, available at
http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/00/000901.html.

B. WEB SITES

Global Environment & Trade Study (GETS) Library, see section on “dispute settlement,”
http://www.gets.org/Library/listContent.cfm.

Global Trade Negotiations Home Page, Center for International Development at Harvard
University, Dispute Settlement, http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidtrade/issues/dispute.html. Many
of the papers available on this page are listed in section A above.

Trade Observatory, Documents Center, Dispute Resolution,

http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm. Many of the papers available on this
page are listed in section A above.

Worldtradelaw.net, Dispute Settlement Commentaries (includes tables and statistics),

http://www.worldtradelaw.net/dsc/main.htm (GULC only).

WTO Dispute Settlement, http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/miti/dispute/index_en.htm.

WTO, Dispute Settlement, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm.

21