Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As a GCSE Student, the amount of pressure for my upcoming exams is too high. My Teachers
haven't even finished the topics that we are studying and we won't revise within a class at school.
This is meaning that we have to revise all at home every night while doing extra homework
therefore putting a lot of pressure on the students in my class. Students should be assessed on the
class work we do in Class and not in an exam...
Exams are unhealthy for students
When students hear of upcoming exams, it usually means that when they go home that night they
feel depressed and worried about how well they will do, and they often compare themselves to
other students and worry about if they will do as well as their friends.
When study begins, it often doesn't stop till midnight, thus leaving the student sleep deprived the
next day, it also stops the student from taking in what they are studying.
Exams stop a student from functioning properly, and often they are disappointed in their final
grade, a reason that exams are bad for the health of students and should be abolished.
Schools should get rid of exams
Because it can put a ton of pressure on the students, therefore, resulting in a ton of stress and
underachievement. Students are forced to learn things that will not help them later in life. Also,
all that the teachers care about is the grade that the student gets, resulting in the students thinking
that the grade will determine their future. Finally, students are forced to stay up extremely late to
study and that will cause them to be tired and not know the correct answers.
Examinations never hurts anyone but brightens up individual's future!
The ratio is 50:50 for students who are against and not against of abolishing school exams. Exam
really doesn't harm anyone but opens up brighter pathway for students to walk on. Many state
that exams should be abolished just because they are 'stressed' by studying. But seriously, no
individual on Earth never gets stressed in their life-time. Even though studying is stressful and
hard, people just have to accept the fact that what is hard and stressful right now will just end up
helping you at the end. Unless you are born in a such a wealthy family and don't have to earn any
money as you already have a 'future' given to you, you have to study very hard to achieve your
goals and gain knowledge. So this is why I think exams should not be abolished.
Exams do not contribute much to our studies and harms our health.
When students hear the word "exam", all they think about is the grade they are going to get. That
is why many students study for the sake of the grade and not learning. Students would also have
to constantly burn the midnight oil when revising for exams. After weeks and weeks of deprived
sleep, the student might fall sick and all their hard work would go to the drain when they cannot
take the exam.
opposition
First of all, foreign labour is almost always cheap. Workers and economic migrants are attracted
to countries with strong economies because they gcan earn higher salaries than at home. This
means that the host country can get a good supply of cheap labour and this will make it more
competitive and increase profits. Second, foreign workers are already trained. There is no need to
wait years to train them in college or on the job. This also saves a lot of money and means that
projects can be completed rapidly. A third point is that foreign workers are prepared to do jobs
that local people do not want to do, such as work in remote areas or do dangerous or dirty jobs.
These often include jobs in construction or in jobs with anti-social hours such as hotels. All of
these mean that companies can provide a wide range of services at lower costs.
Firstly foreign workers help establish job opportunities. An immigrant will take a job within a 3dimensional sector. Thus providing jobs for native born locals such as being promoted to
supervisors. Since there are more workers to do the dirty jobs. Job opportunities can be opened.
More workers (locals) are already losing their job to machines so what's there to lose.
My case is on how foreign labour helps ease the burden on the working population of countries
with low replacement rates.
goverment
First of all, foreign workers may not be loyal to a company. This means they may change job
often or leave the country quickly if there is a problem, such as happened recently in Libya.
Secondly, they may create a lack of employment opportunities among locals. Employers may not
want to give locals high salaries if they can employ expatriates more cheaply. A third problem is
that they lower wages for certain jobs. Jobs which are attractive in some countries such as
construction become very lowly paid if they employ mostly foreign workers. These factors may
cause serious problems and imbalances in the host economy, such as too many locals in the
government or public sector. A further point is that some expatriate labour is not really cheap,
since it may be less effective or their skills may not transfer well to the new country.
A foreign worker is a person who works in a country other than the one of which he or she is a
citizen. Migrant workers may follow work within their own country A foreign worker is a
person who works in a country other than the one of which he or she is a citizen. Migrant
workers may follow work within their own country or between countries, depending on which
definition is used. Some foreign workers are present temporarily and legally through a guest
worker program in a country with more preferred job prospects than their home country. Some
are illegal aliens. Foreign workers temporarily reside in the country in which they work, and will
often send most or all wages earned back to their country of origin.