Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs

FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 2010

10-03-05 Request for guidance regarding complaint procedures pertaining to
operations of allegedly fraudulent computer systems of the Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles, in collusion with County of Los Angeles

Charles McCoy
Presiding Judge

Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:43:51 -0800

To: "Stephanie Maxberry"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Request for guidance regarding complaint procedures pertaining to operations of allegedly fraudulent
computer systems of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in collusion with County of Los
Angeles
Cc: "1st District: Gloria Molina" , "2nd District Mark Ridley-Thomas" , "3rd District Zev Yaroslavsky" , "4th
District Don Knabe", "5th District Michael D. Antonovich"

March 5, 2010

Stephanie Maxberry, Ombudsman

County of Los Angeles, California

RE: Request for guidance regarding complaint procedures pertaining to operations of allegedly
fraudulent computer systems of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in
collusion with County of Los Angeles

Response is kindly requested within 2 business days.

Dear Ombudsman Maxberry:

Thank you for your guidance regarding complaint procedures pertaining to the Sheriff's Department. I am writing
to seek your guidance regarding the process and procedure, and accountable agencies at the County of Los
Angeles, California, for filing complaints pertaining to the operation of computer systems in collusion with the
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Such systems should be deemed as fraud, and serious abuses
of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of all 10 million residents of this county.

This intended complaint is separate from previous complaints, which pertained to operations of the Sheriff's
Department of the County of Los Angeles, California. However - the methods of alleged fraud are very similar.
The Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, has been concealing the true court records for a number
of years, in what must upon review be deemed as violations of First Amendment rights - to access court records - to
inspect and to copy. Instead, just as was described in complaints against the Sheriff's Department of the County of
Los Angeles, the Court has been publishing online false and deliberately misleading records, in lieu of true records

Page 2/2 March 5, 2010

including, but not limited to Registers of Actions, Calendars of the Courts, and Index of All Cases.

Additionally, the court and the county of Los Angeles have been operating a server that holds images of court
records. However, security programs, such as McAfee, routinely issue severe warnings against such server - that it
was operated under false Verisign identity certificates. Needless to say - any court records that were obtained from
a source holding false identity must be deemed lacking in authenticity.

The County of Los Angeles, California, is an obvious party to this alleged fraud, since the Court and the County,
jointly, published an incredulous disclaimer regarding such allegedly fraudulent online publications of court
records -

The Courts and County of Los Angeles declare that information provided by and obtained from this site,
intended for use on a case-by-case basis and typically by parties of record and participants, does not
constitute the official record of the court. Any user of the information is hereby advised that it is being
provided as is and that it may be subject to error or omission. The user acknowledges and agrees that neither
the Los Angeles Superior Court nor the County of Los Angeles are liable in any way whatsoever for the
accuracy or validity of the information provided.

Additionally, at times, when the Court denied access to records stored on such computers, such denial was falsely
excused by the claim that the computers were operated by the County of Los Angeles.

One should note that KPMG, the independent auditor of the County of Los Angeles, California, separately issued a
report which similarly noted material deficiency in validity and security of other computer system operated by the
County of Los Angeles.

As was the case pertaining to the computers of the Sheriff's Department, County of Los Angeles, the proposed
solution is in publicly accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of such systems.

I have previously tried to file complaints with various county agencies in regarding the computer system operated
jointly with the Court, described above. However, County agencies repeatedly claimed that they were not
accountable, or that they had no authority to review the operations of such computers. Such claims appear
unreasonable, since the evidence is clear that the County of Los Angeles is colluding with the Superior Court of
California in such alleged large scale fraud and abuse of rights of the residents of the County of Los Angeles,
California.

Your advise, regarding the correct process and procedure for filing complaints regarding such alleged large scale
abuses would be greatly appreciated.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!