23 7 133 136

2011
Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi

1
1
2
1*
1
1

1
650201 2
650224

S471

1001 8581 2011 07 0133 04

Study on Sense Organs of Insect and Their Application in Pest Control

DING Xu po1 GAO Xi1 ZHU Jia ying2 WU Guo xing1 * XIAO Chun1 LI Zheng yue1
1 College of Plant ProtectionYunnan Agricultural UniversityKunming 650201China
2 College of Biology ConservationSouthwest Forestry UniversityKunming 650224China
Abstract This paper summarized the studies on the sense organs of insectexpounded their applications in pest controland discussed their application prospects
Key words Insect Sense organ Pest control Application

4 5

10 FE
1 m

odorant binding proteinOBP 7 odorant degrading esteraseODE 8 odorant receptor

OR 9

pheromone binding proteinPBP

10

2011 05 25
30960221 2008CD135 ZK10A305
1984

134

general odorant binding

11

23

GOBP
protein
GOBP1 GOBP2

18

30 min 80

min

12

19

Trialeurodes vaporariorum

LED

Dickens

LED 1 /7

Leptinotar-

sa decemlineata

LED

13 14

20

21

Benton DOr83b

15

Rhagoletis pomonella

22

2 3 s
24

23

68

25

300 650 nm

16

25

17

135

40 m

0 03 mol / L

15

15

26

3%

27

30

23
26

GABA

28

DmGr64a f

DmGr61a 7 DmGr5a

31

DmGr66a DmGr66a

DmGr66a

DmGr66a

29

15
24
28

100%

20
25

26 32

24

3 4 m

136

23

pH

of male specific pheromone binding proteins PBPs in the an-

tennae of female noctuiid mothsJ Insect Biochemistry and

33

Molecular Biology
2000
30 6 507 514
11Zhang Z C
Wang M Q
Lu Y B
et al Molecular characterization
and expression pattern of two general odorant binding proteins
from the diamondback mothPlutella xylostellaJ Journal of
2009
35 10 1188 1196
Chemical Ecology

12Koschier E H
Kogel W J D
Visser J H Assessing the attractive-

ness of volatile plant compounds to western flower thripFran-

34

kliniella occidentalisJ Journal of Chemical Ecology

2000
26
12 2643 2655
13Gorski R Effectiveness of natural essential oils in the monitoring
of greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood
2004
16 1 183 187
J Folia Horticulture
14 Dickens J C Plant volatiles moderate response to aggregation
pheromone in Colorado potato beetleJ Journal of Applied Entomology
2006
130 1 26 31

15 Benton R On the origin of smell odorant receptors in insects

J Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

2006
63 14 l579

l585
16

J
2007 6 97 101

17Briscoe A D
White R H Adult stemmata of the butterfly Vanessa
cardui express UV and green opsin mRNAsJ Cell and Tissue
Research
2005
319 1 175 179
18

J 199814 4 713
718

1 M 2009 5
288
2
J
2007 6 45 48
3 M
2007 56
4

J
2008
51 1 75 80

J
2007
50 7 675 681
6

2002
38 2 68 72
J
7Vieira F G
Snchez Gracia A
Rozas J Comparative genomic analysis of the odorant binding protein family in 12 Drosophila
genomes purifying selection and birth and death evolution
J Genome Biology
2007 8 1 16
8 Rtzler MZwiebel L J Molecular biology of insect olfaction re-

19

1998
14 1 85
J
90
20 Flinn P WOpit G PThrone J E Integrating the Stored Grain
Advisor Pro expert system with an automated electronic grain
probe trapping systemC/ / Proceeding of the 9th International
Brazilian Post
Working Conference on Stored Product Protection
2006 408 413
havest Associationg ABRAPOS
21

J
1998
9 3 236

22

2005
41
J
3 45 47
23

2006 10 52 55
J
24

2003
26 S1 208 211
216
J
25Robertson H MWarr C GCarlson J R Molecular evolution of

cent progress and conceptual modelsJ J Comp Physiol A

the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melano-

2005
191 9 777 790

gasterJ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of

9Wicher D
Schfer R
Bauernfeind R
et al Drosophila odorant receptors are both ligand gated and cyclic nucleotide activated
cation channelsJ Nature
2008
452 7190 1007 1011
10Callahan F E
Vogt R G
Tucker M L
et al High level expression

2003
100 14537 14542
the United States of America
26
Schoonhoven L M
1993
36 1 1 7
J

138

138

23

Chi + Glu
11

24 CK1
11 CK2

/ %
9 002 aA

3 623 aA

10 654 aA

4 283 aA

9 095 aA

3 346 aA

2 2

24 CK1

11 CK2

/ %
11 929 aA

3 479 bA

16 092 aA

6 218 abA

17 229 aA

7 381 aA

5 26

35 015%
24

11 19 31 4 73

5 26 15 589

Chi + Glu

24 5 871 11

1 706

24 CK1
11 CK2

2 3

1Broekaert W FVan Parijs JAllen A Ket al Comparison of

some molecularenzymatic and antifungal properties of chitinase

/ %
35 015 aA

15 589 aA

from thorn appletobacco and wheatJ Physiological and Mo-

54 320 aA

21 460 aA

1988
33 319 331
lecular Plant Pathology

39 748 aA

17 295 aA

6 8
11 929%
24 4 16
11 5 3
4

2 Roberts W KSelitrennikoff C P Plant and bacterial chitinase

differs in antifungal activityJ Journal of General Microbiology
1988
134 169 176
3Barber M SBertram R ERide J P Chitin oligosaccharides elicit lignification in wounded wheat leavesJ Physiological and
1989
34 3 12
Molecular Plant Pathology
4Mauch FMauch Mani BBoller T Antifungal hydrolases in

6 8

pea tissue Inhibition of fungal growth by combination of chiti-

3 479
24 2 74

3 glucanaseJ Plant Physiology

1988
88 936
nase and 1

11 3 9

942

Chi + Glu

5 Zhu QMaher E AMasoud Set al Enhanced protection against fungal attack by constitutive co expression of chitinase
and glucanase genes in transgenic tobaccoJ Bio / Technology
1994
12 807 812
6 2 M
1978

136
27

2002
19 5 595 600
J
28
J
2007
33 6 16 21

29Dunipace LMeister SMcNealy Cet a1 Spatially restrited expression of candidate taste receptors in the Drosophila gustatory
systemJ Current Biology
2001
11 822 835
30

1997
40 4 349 357

31 J
1962
11
2 169 185
32 M
2009 222 226
33

2008
26 2
J
213 216
34 J
1995
16 4 109 114