75244 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Notices
allow land disposal of a specific
restricted waste at a specific site. The
EPA Regional Offices will review the
petitions and determine if they
successfully demonstrate ‘‘no
migration.’’ The applicant must
demonstrate that hazardous wastes can
be managed safely in a particular land
disposal unit, so that ‘‘no migration’’ of
any hazardous constituents occurs from
the unit for as long as the waste remains
hazardous. If EPA grants the variance,
the waste is no longer prohibited from
land disposal in that particular unit. If
the owner/operator fails to make this
demonstration, or chooses not to
petition for the variance, best
demonstrated available technology
(BDAT) requirements of 40 CFR 268.40
must be met before the hazardous
wastes are placed in a land disposal
unit.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 3,168 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Business.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.
Frequency of Response: One-time.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
3,168.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$211,275, which includes $121
annualized capital or O&M costs and
$211,154 annual labor costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is no
change in the total estimated burden
currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens.
Dated: December 7, 2006.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Richard T. Westlund,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. E6–21294 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:54 Dec 13, 2006 Jkt 211000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petition IV–2005–1; FRL–8255–8]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Tennessee
Valley Authority—Paradise Fossil
Plant; Drakesboro (Muhlenberg
County), KY
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition
to object to a state operating permit.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act
Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d),
the EPA Administrator signed an Order,
dated October 20, 2006, denying a
petition to object to a state operating
permit proposed by the Kentucky
Division for Air Quality (KDAQ) for
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
Paradise Fossil Plant (TVA Paradise)
located in Drakesboro, Muhlenberg
County, Kentucky. This Order
constitutes final action on the petition
submitted by Preston Forsyth, the
Center for Biological Diversity,
Kentucky Heartwood, and Hillary
Lambert (Petitioners). Pursuant to
section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act
(the Act) any person may seek judicial
review of the Order in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit within 60 days of this notice
under section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order,
the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file
at the following location: EPA Region 4,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The final
Order is also available electronically at
the following address: http://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/
tvaparadise_decision2005.pdf
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art
Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA
Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or
hofmeister.art@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review
and, as appropriate, to object to
operating permits proposed by state
permitting authorities under title V of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section
505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d)
authorize any person to petition the
EPA Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after
the expiration of EPA’s 45-day review
period if EPA has not objected on its
own initiative. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period
provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
Petitioners submitted a petition on
April 21, 2005, requesting that EPA
object to a state title V operating permit
proposed by KDAQ for TVA Paradise.
This action followed an objection (to the
proposed permit) issued by EPA on
February 18, 2005. On August 18, 2006,
at the source’s request, KDAQ
subsequently withdrew the proposed
permit. On October 20, 2006, the
Administrator issued an Order denying
the petition on the basis of it being moot
since a permit (about which EPA could
further object) no longer existed. The
Order further explains EPA’s rationale
for denying the petition.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–21289 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petition IV–2003–6; FRL–8255–7]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Georgia-
Pacific Brunswick Operations;
Brunswick (Glynn County), GA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition
to object to a state operating permit.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act
Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d),
the EPA Administrator signed an Order,
dated September 21, 2006, denying a
petition to object to a state operating
permit issued by the Georgia
Environmental Protection Division
(EPD) to Georgia-Pacific Brunswick
Operations (Georgia-Pacific) located in
Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia. This
Order constitutes final action on the
petition submitted by Ms. Deborah Ann
Strong (Petitioner). Pursuant to section
505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (the Act)
any person may seek judicial review of
the Order in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit
within 60 days of this notice under
section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order,
the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file
14DEN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Notices
at the following location: EPA Region 4,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The final
Order is also available electronically at
the following address: http://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/
georgiapacific_decision2003.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art
Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA
Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or
hofmeister.art@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review
and, as appropriate, to object to
operating permits proposed by state
permitting authorities under title V of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section
505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d)
authorize any person to petition the
EPA Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after
the expiration of EPA’s 45-day review
period if EPA has not objected on its
own initiative. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period
provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
Ms. Strong submitted a petition on
May 15, 2003, requesting that EPA
object to a state title V operating permit
issued by EPD to Georgia-Pacific. The
Petitioner maintains that the Georgia-
Pacific permit is inconsistent with the
Act because: (1) It fails to ensure the
source’s compliance with Georgia’s
nuisance rule; (2) it allows the source to
emit illegal levels of formaldehyde
emissions; and (3) the public notice and
comment procedures associated with its
issuance were flawed.
On September 21, 2006, the
Administrator issued an Order denying
this petition. The Order explains the
reasons behind EPA’s conclusion that
the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate
that the Georgia-Pacific permit is not in
compliance with the requirements of the
Act on the grounds raised.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–21290 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:54 Dec 13, 2006 Jkt 211000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petition IV–2003–8; FRL–8255–6]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Continental
Carbon Company; Phenix City (Russell
County), AL
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition
to object to a state operating permit.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act
Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d),
the EPA Administrator signed an Order,
dated September 21, 2006, denying a
petition to object to a state operating
permit issued by the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) to Continental
Carbon Company located in Phenix
City, Russell County, Alabama. This
Order constitutes final action on the
petition submitted by Action Marine,
Inc.; John Tharpe; the City of Columbus,
Georgia; Owen and Mabel Ditchfield;
Donald and Carolyn Lang; Alma
Chapman; and Lois Baggett (Petitioners).
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the
Clean Air Act (the Act) any person may
seek judicial review of the Order in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit within 60 days of
this notice under section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order,
the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file
at the following location: EPA Region 4,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The final
Order is also available electronically at
the following address: http://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/
continentalcarbon_decision2003.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Forney, Air Permits Section,
EPA Region 4, at (404) 562–9130 or
forney.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review
and, as appropriate, to object to
operating permits proposed by state
permitting authorities under title V of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section
505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d)
authorize any person to petition the
EPA Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after
the expiration of EPA’s 45-day review
period if EPA has not objected on its
own initiative. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
were raised with reasonable specificity
PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
75245
during the public comment period
provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
Petitioners submitted a petition on
December 24, 2003, requesting that EPA
object to a state title V operating permit
issued by ADEM to Continental Carbon.
Petitioners maintain that the
Continental Carbon permit is
inconsistent with the Act because: (1)
The public participation procedures
associated with its issuance failed to
utilize certain local newspapers; and (2)
materials related to changes made to the
draft permit following public comment
were not made readily available to the
public.
On September 21, 2006, the
Administrator issued an Order denying
this petition. The Order explains the
reasons behind EPA’s conclusion that
the Petitioners failed to demonstrate
that the Continental Carbon permit is
not in compliance with the
requirements of the Act on the grounds
raised.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–21291 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petition IV–2001–6; FRL–8255–5]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for King
Finishing; Dover (Screven County), GA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order denying
petition to object to a state operating
permit in response to remand.
SUMMARY: On September 21, 2006, the
Administrator issued an Order Granting
Remanded Issue on Petition to Object
(Order) regarding a state operating
permit issued to King Finishing located
in Dover, Screven County, Georgia,
pursuant to title V of the Clean Air Act
(the Act), 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. On
October 9, 2001, the Georgia Center for
Law in the Public Interest filed a
petition, on behalf of the Sierra Club
(Petitioner), seeking EPA’s objection to
the title V operating permit issued to
King Finishing by the Georgia
Environmental Protection Division
(EPD). The Administrator denied the
14DEN1