Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mariam Khvichia
Ana Nizharadze
Giorgi Khomeriki
Mikheil Tektumanidze
Green Energy
Team of Georgia
International Express Yourself Conference 2015
Heidelberg, Germany
Georgia
Presentation Plan
Green Energy
Green Heating
Theoretical model
Theoretical model
J 0 T0 J 0
T
e
dT
cm J 0 S (T T0 ) S
dt
St
cm
J0
T T0
21.4
Temperature
21.6
21.2
21
20.8
20.6
20.4
20.2
20
50
100
150
T0 - Room temperature
T plate temperature
e Number of Neper
t - Time
S Surface cross area
m Mass of plate
J0 - intensity of sunlight
200
250
300
k Heat conductivity
Time
350
400
cos 2
L d
cos
90
90
180
2 90
S
P P0
S0
Q
t1
t
j0 S sin( ) dt
t0
= .
This system gives us 10 times more energy
than the usual one.
Experiments
Comparison of Theoretical
model and Experiments
Comparison of Theoretical
model and experiment
Hydro Energy
Hydroelectric Station
Generator
AC
Turbine
Dam
AC Generator
Floating Turbine
AC Generator
Advantages of Floating
Turbine
Experiments
1. Distance between spirals edges
1 cm
number of turns
200
150
2 cm
100
number of
turns
50
0
2 cm
2. Difference shaped: spiral - cone-spiral turbines
Reflected velocity
1 cm
Radius 15 cm
Energy assimilation 69.75V^3
Cost 20-40 $
Climate Changes
Ecology
Combustion of coal C+O2 CO2
Combustion of natural gas: C H4+2O2
CO2+2H2O
Ecology
With floating turbine we save environment from
Washing off animals nests
Affecting life-cycle of fish
Obstructing fish migration
Creating potential danger of plant failures
Changing climate in the given area
Conclusion
We investigated ways of hydro and solar energy
assimilation
We studied impacts on ecology causes by these power
productions
We created two models of environmentally friendly
energy collectors
After carrying out experiments we improved our models
and built large ones
Floating Turbine
Green Heating