Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why Composites:
To
To
To
To
Now we will consider the advantage of composites with regard to the above 4
points:
a vehicle structure and closures made of normal materials like steel or Aluminum
would way 500 KG and will consume 10ltr of fuel per 100 km of distance travelled.
If the same structure is made using a HSS (High strength steel) it will weigh 350 KG
(30% weight reduction) in this case the vehicle will consume 9.58 ltr per 100 km
distance which means 4.2% increase in fuel efficiency.
In the third case a Carbon fiber composite is used to build the structure, which
weighs 270KG (42% weight reduction) and the vehicle will consume 9.31 ltr per 100
km of distance driven. This means 7% of increase in fuel efficiency.
It should be noted that if the same carbon fiber composite structure is used on a car
powered by the Diesel engine the fuel efficiency can be increased by a whopping
30% and its 35% with a Full hybrid petrol engine and 45 % in case of a Hybrid Diesel
engine.
2. Composites to improve safety and crash worthiness:
The crashworthiness design fundamentals include the below points:
Classification of composites
Composites are classified based on the matrix used and reinforcing material used in
the formation of the composite material.
Based on Matrix used:
Based on the Reinforcing material used
The use of Composites in the Automobile industry is not a new invention, they are
used In the automobiles as early as 1930s.
History of Composites in the Automobile industry
In 1930- Henry Ford attempted to use Soya oil to produce a Phenolic resin and
thence to produce a Wood filled composite material for car bodies
1940 - flax - a flax reinforced Spitfire fuselage was made at Duxford,
Cambridgeshire.
In the 1950s when glass fiber reinforcement material and cold setting polyester
resins became commercially available, this put the manufacture of compound
curved streamlined automotive bodies into the reach of low volume, low capital
By the beginning of the 1960s the low volume car producers were producing
structural monologues in hand laid GRP examples are the Lotus Elite, and these
craft level wet hand layup methods were the mainstay of composite production
throughout the nineteen sixties, limiting their application to low volume high value
specialist sports car manufacture - example the Reliant Scimitar.
The Reliant Scimitar (GTE SE6a shown here) had a hand laid body supported by a
steel chassis (Source: Nick Tucker)
In the late 1980s the Pontiac Fiero (Figure 5) laid a good claim as the first mass
production Composite intensive car body. The Fiero had a space frame chassis and a
body using a number of different types of Composites. The high performance (and
cost) image of composites has lead to amusing spin offs such as the manufacture of
polypropylene moldings for the juvenile market that look just like carbon fiber.
These articles are of course limited to non-structural applications such as air ducts
and trim pieces.
The Pontiac Fiero mass production composite intensive body (Source:
www.pontiacfiero.com)
In the late 1990s, Rover Group (moving later into the BMW Group phase) was
working very closely with researchers at the Warwick Manufacturing Group at the
University of Warwick. The collaboration (first known as EPIC Engineering Polymers
Integrated Capability), and then SALVO Structurally Advanced Lightweight Vehicle
Objective) had the aim of providing information on new materials, manufacturing
technologies, and facilitating the integration of such materials and technologies into
volume automotive manufacturing in the new millennium.
Why Composites?
The table below shows the values of fuel consumption and fuel efficiency for
different design types and vehicle weights.
As per this study, a vehicle structure and closures made of normal materials like
steel or Aluminum would way 500 KG and will consume 10ltr of fuel per 100 km of
distance travelled.
If the same structure is made using a HSS (High strength steel) it will weigh 350 KG
(30% weight reduction) in this case the vehicle will consume 9.58 ltr per 100 km
distance which means 4.2% increase in fuel efficiency.
In the third case a Carbon fiber composite is used to build the structure, which
weighs 270KG (42% weight reduction) and the vehicle will consume 9.31 ltr per 100
km of distance driven. This means 7% of increase in fuel efficiency.
It should be noted that if the same carbon fiber composite structure is used on a car
powered by the Diesel engine the fuel efficiency can be increased by a whopping
30% and its 35% with a Full hybrid petrol engine and 45 % in case of a Hybrid Diesel
engine.
The SEA value for Aluminum is around 25KJ/kg and for steel its around 35Kj/Kg. And
SEA values for the Glass /Epoxy is in the 75 KJ/kg and for Carbon / PEEK its as high
as 200KJ/kg.This proves that a structure built with a composite is 6 to 8 times safer
than a structure built with metals.
has led to the use of composite materials in the construction of the body, interiors,
chassis, hoods, electrical components etc. The composite materials have the
desired properties to suit the requirements. Hence there is more scope for the
composites today and also will be in future in the Automobile industry.
The below Pie chart shows the amount of composite material used by the
Automobile companies during the year 2007. The major players in the automotive
world like General Motors (33%) Ford (25%) and Daimler Chrysler (21%) are using
the composite materials extensively.
Examples of composites in the automotive industry:
There are already a number of composites used in the automotive industry. A few
examples
Of which follow. These are mainly from a European standpoint although examples of
the
US industries where some composites are widely used are also included.
Composite Modular Front Ends The first composite front end was introduced in
1987 on a Peugeot 405, manufactured
From sheet moulding compound (SMC). Others, e.g., Peugeot 605 and Citroen XM
In most cases polymer matrix composites (PMC) are in competition against existing
metal components. In the case of automotive applications this means steel and
aluminium. The advantages of steel are cost, strength, and a route for recycling that
is an integral part of the manufacturing process, 50% of manufactured steel finds its
way back to the steel works as scrap [1]. The disadvantages are the very high cost
of plant and tooling and the limits of ductility. The case for aluminium is also
constrained by the relatively high material cost. However, this is usually off-set by
an additional weight saving potential.
The ductility implication of metals means that complex
shapes must be made as Fabrications. Making a similar component from PMC is
characterized by cheap plant, but expensive materials, which allow complex shapes
to be made as single articles. Whilst PMC are usually accepted for low volume
applications, they can only overcome their perceived disadvantages for large scale
manufacture by being used to make a more sophisticated product.
Composite use on our current vehicles looks set to increase substantially (market
trends Suggest up to 10% growth per year in automotive markets) and the use of
such components will give the OEM a customer benefit that will be hard to ignore.
The successful exploitation of composite materials
may well give motor manufacturers the edge they require to stay ahead of the
marketplace and it is up to each OEM to ensure they remain at the forefront of this
technology.
Summary:
Composite materials are already being used in various forms throughout the
automotive Industry, from sheet moulding compound (SMC) fenders to
thermoplastic composite tail doors. The use of composites has been driven by the
requirement to save weight and also By the reduction in investment costs
associated with composites. Future economic and Environmental pressures will tend
to increase the use of low-density materials and Composites in particular.