Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Ahuachapn geothermal power station, located in the
western part of El Salvador has been experiencing
challenges with time due to its brine disposals in the
Chipilapa area.
1. INTRODUCTION
Ahuachapn Geothermal Field located in the western part of
El Salvador, has been evolving its reinjection conditions
from discharging brine to the Pacific Ocean in 1976, to
partial reinjection in the northeastern part of the field
combined with brine disposals to the sea in 1998, and then
to total brine reinjection in 2004.
SILENCER
F1,2: FLASHER
LPC: LOW P. COLLECTOR
C1,2,3: COLLECTORS
G1,2,3: GENERATORS
CYCLONIC
SEPARATOR
PRODUCTION
WELL
F1
F2
C1
C2
C3
LPC
G1
HOT REINJECTION
WELL
G2
PUMPS
COLD REINJECTION
WELL
G3
brego
PUMP AT POWER
STATION
REINJECTION
LINE 2
REINJECTION
LINE 1
CH9
CH10
CH9A
CH7B
CH7
Figure 2: Schematic distribution of reinjection pipelines and wells in Ahuachapn reinjection system
brego
bar/day for the same amount of brine injected. He also
established that skin effect was causing this behavior.
3. METHOD OF EVALUATION
3.1 Well Injectivity Curve
It was plotted the injectivity curve with time for each
reinjection well in order to obtain the best fit regression
curve. (Figure 4, 5 and 6)
y = 2E+45e
-0.0025x
R = 0.9827
CH10
Exponencial (CH10)
09
06
/0
7/
08
18
/1
2/
08
01
/0
6/
07
14
28
10
/0
4/
/1
1/
07
06
/1
0/
06
24
05
/0
3/
/0
9/
05
Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Date
y = 1E+24e
-0.0013x
R = 0.6512
Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
60
50
40
30
20
10
CH7
Exponencial (CH7)
06
/0
7/
09
18
/1
2/
08
01
/0
6/
08
14
/1
1/
07
28
/0
4/
07
10
/1
0/
06
24
/0
3/
06
05
/0
9/
05
Date
Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
y = 3E+70e
2
R = 0.9697
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
CH7BIS
Exponencial (CH7BIS)
Date
06
/0
7/
09
18
/1
2/
08
01
/0
6/
08
14
/1
1/
07
28
/0
4/
07
10
/1
0/
06
24
/0
3/
06
05
/0
9/
05
brego
Where V, m, are fluid velocity, mass flow rate, pipeline
internal diameter, respectively.
Hf = f
L V2
D 2 g
(1)
1.325
e
5.74
2 1000
+ 0.9
ln
3.7 D Re
(2)
Re = V
(3)
9.81 H f
(4)
100000
V =
(5)
2
4
50
40
30
20
10
23
/0
8/
19
10
/0
4/
18
02
/0
3/
14
18
/1
0/
12
06
/0
6/
11
22
/0
1/
10
0
09
/0
9/
08
INJECTIVITY (Kg/s/bar)
CH9A INJECTIVITY
60
26
/1
1/
16
dp =
15
/0
7/
15
f =
Date
CH9A-1
CH9A-2
CH9A-3
CH9A-5
CH9A-6
CH9A-7
CH9A-4
brego
12
CH10
CH7
CH7B
CH9
PPump (bara)
11.5
11
10.5
10
9.5
9
20
20
14
13
2
01
4/
4/
01
01
/0
/0
/0
01
01
01
/0
/0
4/
4/
4/
2
20
10
20
09
4/
20
/0
01
11
8.5
Date
Figure 8: Ahuachapn reinjection system pressure changes for a single well (CH10, CH7, CH7B, CH9) injectivity variation.
12
CH9A-1
CH9A-2
CH9A-3
CH9A-4
CH9A-5
CH9A-6
CH9A-7
11.5
Ppump (bara)
11
10.5
10
9.5
9
8.5
01
01
/
04
/
/0
4/
20
20
14
13
2
01
/
04
/2
01
11
/0
4/
20
01
/0
4/
01
01
/
04
/
20
20
09
10
Date
Figure 9: Ahuachapn reinjection system pressure change with single well CH9A injectivity variation
12
Ppump (bara)
11
CH9A-1
CH9A-2
CH9A-3
CH9A-4
CH9A-5
CH9A-6
CH9A-7
10
Date
01
/0
4
01
/0
4/
2
/2
01
00
9
Figure 10: Ahuachapn reinjection system pressure changes with all well injectivity variations
5
brego
5.
APPROACH
ENSUREMENT.
FOR
BRINE
DISPOSAL
120
9 bar case
100
8 bar case
80
7 bar case
60
40
20
28
/0
3/
09
/0
8
09
/0
9
CH9A
22
/0
2
CH9
/0
8
/0
7
06
/0
8
/0
7
18
/0
1
/0
6
02
/0
7
14
/1
2
/0
5
Date
CH7
CH7BIS
Figure 11: Well injectivity values for chemical stimulation scenarios 9, 8, 7 bara
Table 1: % well recovery with chemical stimulation for power station pumping pressure of 10 bara
10 BARA CASE.
(Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Future Inject.
16.97
0.7739
7.541
2.46
42.87
Present Inject.
22.71
1.243
8.812
3.19
47.72
% Well Recovery
-25%
-38%
-14%
-23%
-10%
Table 2: % well recovery with chemical stimulation for power station pumping pressure of 9 bara
9 BARA CASE.
(Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Future Inject.
20.63
1.072
8.394
2.94
45.66
Present Inject.
22.71
1.243
8.812
3.19
47.72
%Well Recovery
-9%
-14%
-5%
-8%
-4%
Table 3: % well recovery with chemical stimulation for power station pumping pressure of 8 bara
8 BARA CASE.
(Injectivity (kg/s/bar)
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Future Inject.
26.34
1.564
9.503
3.61
47.72
Present Inject.
22.71
1.243
8.812
3.19
47.72
% Well Recovery
16%
26%
6
8%
13%
0%
brego
For 7 bara case, again well CH9A kept its injectivity value
same as present, and higher well injectivity recovery would
be needed. Well CH7B, CH10 and CH9 would have the
strongest contribution for brine disposal. (Table 4)
50
45
40
ICH10-10B
ICH7-10B
ICH9-10B
35
ICH10-9B
ICH7-9B
ICH9-9B
ICH9A-9B
ICH7B-9B
ICH9A-10B
ICH7B-10B
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
CH9A-7
CH9A-4
CH9A-1
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Future Inject.
34.73
2.45
11.02
4.63
47.72
Present Inject.
22.71
1.243
8.812
3.19
47.72
% Well Recovery
53%
97%
25%
45%
0%
Table 5: Well head pump requirements for 10 bara chemical stimulation scenarios
CHEMICAL STIM.
10 BAR CASE
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
(PS:9BAR)WHP (bara)
8.33
12.92
11.93
10.16
7.53
(PS:8BAR)WHP (bara)
7.24
16.8
16.71
16.67
6.68
(PS:7BAR)WHP (bara)
6.26
21.32
21.22
21.54
5.91
(PS:9BAR)Flow (kg/s)
140.8
10
90
25
323.2
(PS:8BAR)Flow (kg/s)
122.5
13
126
41
286.5
105.9
16.5
160
53
253.6
(PS:7BAR)Flow (kg/s)
brego
PUMP AND CHEMICAL STIMULATION (10 BAR CASE)
25
300
WHP BARA
20
250
15
200
10
150
100
350
50
0
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Reinjection well
WHP-9BAR
WHP-8BAR
WHP-7BAR
Flow-9BAR
Flow-8BAR
Flow-7BAR
Figure 13: Well head pump requirements for 10 bara chemical stimulation scenarios
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
350
300
250
200
150
100
Mass flow
(kg/s)
WHP BARA
50
0
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Reinjection well
WHP-8BAR
WHP-7BAR
Flow-8BAR
Flow-7BAR
Figure 14: Well head pump requirements for chemical stimulation 9 bara scenarios
Table 6: Well head pumping requirements for chemical stimulation 9 bara scenarios
CHEMICAL STIM.
9 BAR CASE
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
(PS:8BAR)WHP (bara)
7.32
10.26
10.72
10.88
6.67
(PS:7BAR)WHP (bara)
6.21
15.86
15.73
15.3
5.83
(PS:8BAR)Flow (kg/s)
151.6
11
90
32
304.4
128.8
17
132
45
266.2
(PS:7BAR)Flow (kg/s)
brego
Table 7: Well head pump requirements for chemical stimulation 8 bara scenarios
CHEMICAL
STIMULATION
8 BAR CASE
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
6.3
9.51
9.97
9.63
5.9
35
278
(PS:7BAR)WHP(bara)
(PS:7BAR)Flow(kg/s)
166
15
95
Note: PS: Power Station Pressure.
12
300
10
250
200
150
100
50
WHP BARA
0
CH10
CH7B
CH7
CH9
CH9A
Reinjection well
WHP-7BAR
Flow-7BAR
CH7B
CH7
CH9
0.7739
7.541
2.46
WHP bara
22.5
21.49
22.4
16.5
160
53
Table 9: Power station pump requirements for chemical stimulation 9 bara scenario
Power Station
Pump pressure (bara): 19
9 BAR CASE.
Chemical Stimulation.
CH7B
CH7
CH9
1.072
8.39
2.94
WHP bara
16.34
15.46
17.8
18.15
121.3
53.5
brego
Approximately same pump pressure would be required in
the power station in order to inject in CH7B, CH7 and CH9
a total flow of 230 kg/s.
The pump needed in the power station will have the same
pressure rate as the ones compared with the well head
pressure pumps. The pump flow could be managed by just a
single pump in the power station.
6. CONCLUSIONS.
5 year period reinjection ensurement with existing wells
CH10, CH7B, CH7, CH9, and CH9A could be achieved
with just chemical stimulation if there is a minimum well
injectivity recovery similar to the ones showed Table 3.
REFERENCES
Barrios, L: Chipilapa chemical stimulation program,
Internal Report, Reservoir Unit, Production
Management, LaGeo S.A de C.V., El Salvador C.A.
(2009).
8 BARA CASE.
(Injectivity
(kg/s/bar)
% Well Recovery
CH10 CH7B
16%
26%
CH7
8%
CH9
CH9A
13%
0%
10