Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
For a structure with constant cross-section and end
boundary conditions that do not change transversely, stress
analysis can be performed using finite strip instead of finite
elements. In each strip, the displacement component at any
point is expressed in terms of the displacement parameters
of nodal lines by means of simple polynomials in the
transverse direction and continuously differentiable smooth
series in the longitudinal direction. With the stipulation that
such series should satisfy the boundary conditions at the
ends of the strip. Using Strain-displacement relationships,
the strain energy of the structure and the potential energy of
external loads can be expressed in terms of the
displacement parameters should make the total potential
energy of the structure become minimum. This yields a set
of linear algebraic equations with the displacement
parameters, the displacement and stress components at any
point in the structure can be obtained.
191
=0
3.1
3.2
3.3
=0
3.4
3.5
3.6
sin
3.8
M(y) =
EI
d 2w
=
dy 2
sin
3.9
w(y) =
m sin
m 1
m y
l
3.10
w(y) =
m 1
M(y) =
m 1
sin
sin
sin
sin
3.11
a0 , a1 , a2 , a3 ......
Where
N1 ( x) (1 3 X 2 +2 X 3 )
N2 ( x) x(1 2 X + X 2 )
N 3 ( x) ( 3 X 2 2 X 3 )
N 4 ( x) x( X 2 X )
In a matrix form,
r
w(x,y) =
fm( x)sin
m 1
r
(a
m 1
m y
l
a1 x a2 x 2 a3 x3 ....)sin
wim
r
im m y
w(x,y) = [ N1 , N 2 ,N 3 , N 4 ]
sin
l
m 1
w jm
jm
m y
l
3.12
3.16
More concisely
parameters.
Consider deflection amplitudes for a plate strip. As
shown above In this there are four displacement parameters
w(x,y) =
Energy Formulation
m y
l
m 1
r
m y
w j = w jm sin
l
m 1
m 1
wi =
im
[ N ]
sin
m y
3.17
l
sin
3.13
r
dw
m y
)i = im sin
dx
l
m 1
r
dw
m y
j = ( ) j = jm sin
dx
l
m 1
2w
2
x
2
w
dxdy
2
y
2w
2
xy
i = (
To
include
the
four
displacement
3.14
3.14
U= 1
2
parameters
is
fm( x) = a0 a1 x a2 x 2 a3 x3
U= 1
2
193
dxdy
1 r
U k m m
2 m1
m
T
W
m 1
Ut
pm
k1
Kii Kij k
b 3
b
k m
Kij K jj k4
b b
k5
symmetrical
k2
k5
k1
k6
k3
13lb 4
12l 2
6l
6l
km Dy
km Dxy km2 D1 3 Dx
70
5b
5b
b
k2
lb3 4
4lb 2
2lb 2
2l
km Dy
km Dxy
km D1 Dx
210
15
15
b
m 1
r
k Im Im
Im
T
Wt
k2
k1
k3
1 S
2 I 1
I 1 m 1
pIm
Im
t Ut Wt
In order to obtain the best approximation the total
potential energy developed in the system become a
minimum.
t
0 ,
wim
t
0
im
11lb 4
l
3l
3l
km Dy km2 Dxy km2 D1 2 Dx
420
5
5
b
k4
9lb 4
12l 2
6l
6l
km Dy
km Dxy km2 D1 3 Dx
140
5b
5b
b
k5
13lb2 4
l
l
3l
km Dy km2 Dxy km2 D1 2 Dx
840
5
10
b
k6
lb3 4
lb
lb
l
km Dy km2 Dxy km2 D1 Dx
280
15
30
b
Load vector
pm
P0 at ( x0 , y0 ) is,
N1 ( x0 )
N ( x )
2 0
p0 sin km y0
N3 ( x0 )
N 4 ( x0 )
194
Comments:
Bending Moment is obviously zero at both the supports
and nature of graph observed to be sinusoidal in nature.
Variation of Bending Moment (Mx, My and Mxy)
observed at 3.0 m, 6.0 m and 9.0 m from the left to right
support shown by the graphs is plus or minus 5 % while
comparing program to staad-pro results.
Results and discussion
Comparison of displacement and bending moment
(transverse, longitudinal and twisting) values as obtained
by the computer program and Staad-Pro at 3.0 m, 6.0 m
and 9.0 m from the left to right support shown by the
graphs. It is observed from these graphs that values of
downward displacement and bending moment obtained by
the computer program and that obtained by Staad-Pro is
comparable.
Comments:
Displacement is obviously zero at both the supports and
nature of graph observed to be parabolic in nature.
V. PARAMETRIC WORK
195
Comments:
Comments :
Bending moment obviously zero at both the support.
For given skew angle Mx varies in a sinusoidal form
The maximum bending moment observe at centre.
With increase in skew angle Mx decreases up to skew
angle 300 then it again increases
196
Comments:
Bending moment obviously zero at both the support.
For given skew angle Mx varies in a sinusoidal form
The maximum bending moment observe at centre.
With increase in skew angle bending moment increases
and its nature reverses.
VII. NOTATIONS
P .. load
w . Displacement
M . Bending Moment
. Total potential energy
W . Potential energy
U . Strain energy
r .. No. of series terms
[N] Matrix of transverse shape function
Mx Transverse bending moment
My Longitudinal bending moment
Mxy . Twisting moment
{M} . Moment vector
Dx Flexural rigidity
Dxy .. Torsional rigidity
D1 Coupling rigidity
Comments:
Bending moment obviously zero at both the support.
For given skew angle Mxy varies in a sinusoidal form
The maximum bending moment observe at centre.
With increase in skew angle bending moment increases
and its nature reverse
197
Stiffness matrix
Load vector
Curvature vector
no. of strips
is subscript representing the whole structure.
REFERENCE
[1 ] Cheung Y.K. ( 1969) Analysis of box Girder Bridge by finite strip
methodACI Publication, SP-26, 357-378
[2 ] Finite Strip Method in Structural Analysis by Y.K.Cheung.
[3 ] The Finite Strip Method in Bridge Engg. Dr. Yew-Chaye Loo
[4 ] Cheung M.S. , Georges Akhras. ( 1994) Combined boundary
element/Finite strip analysis of bridges Journal of Structural
Engineering, ASCE, 120, 716-727.
[5 ] Scordelis A.C. ( 1966) Analysis of simply supported box girder
bridgesSESM report 66-17, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
[6 ] Cheung M.S. Cheung Y.K. ( 1971 ) Analysis of curved box girder
bridges by finite strip method IABSE, 1-19
[7 ] Finite Element method by C.S. Desai and J.F.Abel.
[8 ] Buragohain D.N. Analysis of curved box girder bridgesStructural
Division, ASCE, 99, 799-819
[9 ] The Finite Element method by O.C.Zienkiewicz. and R.L.Taylor
Fourth edition (Volume 1)
[10 ] Finite Element Analysis Theory & Programming (Second Edition)
By C.S. Krishnamurthy.
198