Professional Documents
Culture Documents
233715
PERFORMING ORGANISATION
RINA SPA
REV.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
PAGES
0
1
2
3
4
5
August 2009
November 2009
November 2009
December 2009
February 2010
February 2010
63
67
CHECKED
APPROVED
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Index
1.
2.
3.
General ................................................................................................................................................4
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
3.1.
3.1.1.
3.1.2.
3.1.3.
3.1.4.
3.2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
3.2.1.
3.2.2.
3.2.3.
3.2.4.
3.2.5.
4.1.
4.2.
4.3.
Thickness measurement..............................................................................16
4.4.
4.5.
4.5.1.
4.5.2.
4.5.3.
Pitting .................................................................................................30
6.1.
6.2.
7.1.
General.......................................................................................................47
7.2.
Conditions..................................................................................................47
7.3.
Procedures..................................................................................................47
FP7-SST-RTD-1
8.
MINOAS 233715
Introduction ..........................................................................................................48
9.
8.1.
8.2.
Corrosion ...................................................................................................50
8.3.
8.3.1.
8.3.2.
8.3.3.
Measurement execution.......................................................................54
8.3.4.
8.4.
Reporting ...................................................................................................55
8.5.
8.6.
10.1.
Special survey.........................................................................................63
10.2.
10.3.
10.4.
FP7-SST-RTD-1
1.
MINOAS 233715
General
T1.1 Analysis and task assessment during a vessel inspection of WP1 will provide
as outcome specific guidelines under which the ship inspection will be executed
utilizing the system proposed by MINOAS. The guidelines will be in the form of a list
of instructions / suggestions towards the inspector on the procedures to be followed
during the phases a) of a vessel inspection and b) repair-marking.
During the phase (a) of the project, T1.1 will define the areas that are going to be
inspected and the type of the measurements that is required by the robots. The
traditional inspection protocol, will act as basic guideline for T1.1. Furthermore, a
specific work-plan is required as outcome that will indicate:
the number and the type of the measurements that are needed. The wall thickness
measurements and the image grabbing are considered as prerequisite/ basic tasks.
the frequency in which the measurements are going to be taken. Taking under
consideration that the vessels walls and overall structure cover vast areas of
metallic surfaces, the measurements will be taken according to a predefined
spatial distribution.
the critical sections of the vessel, that require a more elaborate examination.
Under phase (b) of the project, T1.1 will extract the criteria upon which specific areas
of the vessel are in need of repair. These areas will be marked by the robots,
indicating the exact locations of intervention for the repair/ maintenance crew. This
study will produce specification on the number and the sequence of action required
under a MINOAS-type inspection and will provide input for the corresponding tasks
that study the technological aspects of the related tasks, such as the way the robots are
deployed, the way they communicate with the central controller, etc.- T1.4-T1.8.
The results of T1.1 will be documented under D1.1 Definition of the Inspection
Plan / Definition of Acceptance Criteria and will include results and comparison on
the effort minimization achieved within MINOAS related to the traditional inspection
procedures.
FP7-SST-RTD-1
2.
2.1.
MINOAS 233715
In the following, Lloyds Register Class procedures and requirements for the hull
inspection and survey are detailed.
The requirements and the frequency of survey of cargo hold is dependent on the age
of the ship and ship type which focuses on close up survey, overall survey, and
thickness measurements aimed at detecting fractures, buckling, corrosion and other
types of structural deterioration. The following tables shows LR rule requirements for
the survey of double hull tanker and bulk carriers during special survey.Table below
gives details.
2.2.
Special Survey I
(Ships 5 years old)
Special Survey II
(Ships 10 years old)
Special Survey IV
(Ships 20 years old and
over)
NOTES
(1) Complete ballast tank means double bottom tank
plus the double side tank and the double deck tank, as
applicable, even if these are separate.
(2) Where there are no centre tanks, the transverse
bulkheads in wing tanks are to be subject to Close-up
Survey.
(3) Web frame ring in a ballast tank includes the
vertical web in side tank, hopper web in hopper tank,
floor in double bottom tank and deck transverse in a
double deck tank and adjacent structural members. In
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
2.3.
Special Survey I
(Ships 5 years old)
NOTES
1. Close-up survey of cargo hold transverse bulkheads to be carried out at the following areas:
(i) Immediately above the inner bottom and immediately above the tween decks, as applicable.
(ii) Mid-height of the bulkhead for the holds without tween decks.
(iii) Immediately below the main deck plating and tween deck plating.
2. Ballast tank includes peak tanks.
FP7-SST-RTD-1
2.4.
MINOAS 233715
Special Survey II
(Ships 10 years old)
Special Survey IV
(Ships 20 years old and
over)
(5) All cargo hold hatch (5) All cargo hold hatch
covers and coamings
covers and coamings
(plating and stiffeners) (plating and stiffeners)
(6) All deck plating and
underdeck structure
inside line of hatch
openings between all
cargo hold hatches
NOTES
(1) Complete ballast tank means topside tank, hopper tank, double bottom tank and double side tank, even if these
are separate.
(2) Ballast Tank includes peak tanks.
(3) Close-up survey of transverse bulkheads to be carried out at four levels:
Level (a) Immediately above the inner bottom and immediately above the line of gussets (if fitted) and shedders
for ships without lower stool.
Level (b) Immediately above and below the lower stool shelf plate (for those ships fitted with lower stools), and
immediately above the line of the shedder plates.
Level (c) About mid-height of the bulkhead.
Level (d) Immediately below the upper deck plating and immediately adjacent to the upper wing tank and
immediately below the upper stool shelf plate for those ships fitted with upper stools, or immediately below the
topside tanks.
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.
MINOAS 233715
The following gives and interpretation for the location and critical sections mentioned
in the survey requirements.
3.1.
The purpose of carrying out structural survey of any tank is to determine the
extent of corrosion wastage and structural defects present in the tank and verify
suitability of the structure to continue in offering the strength needed for continous
efficient operation of vessels.
To help achieve this and to identify key locations in the tank that might warrant
special attention, it is paramount to understand the terms mentioned within the rule
requirements. The following cross section diagrams depict the locations described in
the LR rules and provides familiarisation with the configurations within the cargo
holds of oil tankers and bulk carriers.
3.1.1.
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.1.2.
MINOAS 233715
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.1.3.
MINOAS 233715
10
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.1.4.
MINOAS 233715
11
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.2.
3.2.1.
MINOAS 233715
12
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.2.2.
MINOAS 233715
13
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.2.3.
3.2.4.
MINOAS 233715
14
FP7-SST-RTD-1
3.2.5.
MINOAS 233715
15
FP7-SST-RTD-1
4.
MINOAS 233715
In the following RINA Class procedures and requirements for the structural inspection
and survey are detailed.
4.1.
Maintenance of Class
The maintence of Class foresees that ships are submitted to Class renewal survey,
Intermediate class survey and Annual survey and Bottom survey. The relevant criteria
are provided in RINA Rules Pt A Ch 2 Sec 2.
4.3.
Thickness measurement
all
service notations
except those in
other rows
TYPE OF
CLASS RENEWAL
INTERMEDIATE
ANNUAL
16
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
17
FP7-SST-RTD-1
chemical tanker
ESP
liquefied gas
carrier
4.4.
MINOAS 233715
Ch 4, Sec 6, Tab 1 :
thickness measurements to be
taken if deemed necessary
by the Surveyor
Table 5 provides explanations and/or interpretations for the locations and number
of points to be measured
Table 5: Interpretations of rule requirements for the locations and number of points to
be measured
A) SYSTEMATIC MEASUREMENTS
ITEM
INTERPRETATION
FIGURE
No figure
No figure
Transverse section
18
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
No figure
No figure
B) CLOSE-UP SURVEYS AND RELATED MEASUREMENTS (for oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers and combination carriers)
ITEM
INTERPRETATION
FIGURE
No figure
Deck transverse
Transverse bulkhead
19
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
No figure
C) CLOSE-UP SURVEYS AND RELATED MEASUREMENTS (for bulk and ore carriers)
ITEM
INTERPRETATION
FIGURE
20
FP7-SST-RTD-1
4.5.
MINOAS 233715
The acceptance criteria for the minimum thicknesses are divided into:
criteria on pitting
Each measured structural item is to be checked against the following criteria, as far as
applicable. Where any of the criteria are not met, reinforcements, repairs and renewals
are to be carried out as appropriate.
4.5.1.
Local and global strength criteria are given for the following ship types:
general cargo ships
bulk carriers
Oil tankers.
These criteria may also be used for other ship types taking into consideration the
equivalence or similarity of structural elements and their contribution to local and/or
global strength.
The evaluation of ship longitudinal strength is based on the prerequisite that fillet
welding between longitudinal members and deck, side and bottom plating is
maintained effective so as to keep continuity of hull structures.
Each structural item to be assessed is illustrated in a typical transverse section (see fig
1 for general cargo ships, fig 2 for bulk carriers, fig 3 for oil tankers).
These structural items are grouped according to their position and contribution to the
local or global strength of the ship (see tab 6 for general cargo ships, tab 7 for bulk
carriers, tab 8 for oil tankers).
Each structural item is to be assessed according to four different criteria which vary
with regard to the domain under which it is considered, namely:
a) An isolated area, which is meant as a part of a single structural item. This
criterion takes into consideration very local aspects such as grooving of a plate or web,
or local severe corrosion; however, it is not to be used for pitting for which separate
criteria are considered
b) An item, which is meant as an individual element such as a plate, a stiffener, a
web, etc. This criterion takes into consideration the average condition of the item,
which is assessed by determining its average thickness using the various
measurements taken on the same item
c) a group of items, which is meant as a set of elements of the same nature (plates,
longitudinals, girders) contributing either to the longitudinal global strength of
the ship in a given zone or to the global strength of other primary transverse
21
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
elements not contributing to the ship longitudinal strength, e.g. Bulkheads, hatch
covers, web frames
d) a zone, which is meant as all and only longitudinal elements contributing to the
longitudinal strength of the ship; in this regard, the three main zones are defined as
deck zone, neutral axis zone and bottom zone. This criterion takes into consideration
the average condition of all groups of items belonging to the same zone.
22
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
23
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Table 6: Local and global acceptance criteria for general cargo ships (given in % of
wastage)
Group of
items
Description of items
1
Isolated
area
2
Item
3
Group
4
Zone
(1)
Hatch coaming
1
web
flange
NEUTRAL AXIS ZONE
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
10
25
20
20
15
10
-
30
20
10
30
25
20
15
10
-
15
25
20
15
25
20
20
15
15
-
Tweendeck plating
30
20
15
Tweendeck longitudinals
web
flange
30
25
20
15
15
-
25
20
10
10
-
Bottom girders
25
20
10
24
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Contd
Group of
items
Description of items
1
Isolated
area
2
Item
3
Group
4
Zone
10
30
25
20
15
10
-
11
30
20
10
30
25
20
15
10
-
25
30
25
30
30
20
25
20
20
20
15
-
30
30
25
30
25
30
20
20
15
20
15
20
15
-
30
25
30
20
15
20
web
flange
30
25
20
15
Floors
plating
30
20
30
30
25
20
20
15
15
-
12
web
flange
OTHER ITEMS
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
web
flange
brackets
Deck/tweendeck frames
20
21
(1)
(2)
(3)
plating
stiffener web
stiffener flange
25
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Table 7 : Local and global acceptance criteria for bulk carriers (given in % of
wastage) (1/7/2005)
Group of
items
1
Isolated
area
Description of items
2
Item
3
Group
4
Zone
(1)
10
25
20
10
Deck longitudinals
web
flange
25
20
20
15
10
-
25
20
20
15
10
-
25
20
10
25
20
20
15
10
-
25
25
20
20
15
10
15
10
-
25
20
20
15
10
-
Bottom girders
25
15
10
10
25
20
10
10
11
25
20
20
15
6
7
OTHER ITEMS
12
25
20
13
30
25
14
25
20
15
15
25
20
16
25
20
26
FP7-SST-RTD-1
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
MINOAS 233715
17
25
25
20
20
20
15
15
-
18
25
20
20
20
15
15
19
25
20
20
15
20
Floors
plating
25
15
21
25
25
20
20
20
15
15
-
For ships indicated in Ch 6, Sec 2, [1.1] which are to comply with the retroactive requirements according to the schedule given in Ch 6,
Sec 2, [1.2], the bulkhead between the two foremost cargo holds is to be assessed based on the criteria given in Ch 6, Sec 2, [1.3].
For ships indicated in Pt E, Ch 4, Sec 3, [7.1.1], contracted for construction on or after 1 July 1998, all bulkheads are to be repaired by
steel renewal where the gauged thickness is less than t + 0,5 mm, where t net is the thickness obtained by applying the strength criteria
given in Pt E, Ch 4, Sec 3, [7.1]. However, where the gauged thickness is within the range t net + 0,5 mm and t net + 1,0 mm, coating
(applied in accordance with the coating Manufacturers requirements) or annual gauging may be adopted as an alternative to steel
renewal.
For ships indicated in Ch 1, Sec 2, [4.3.2], contracted for construction before 1 January 2004, the renewal criteria of all cargo hatch covers are
as follows:
for single skin hatch covers and for the plating of pontoon covers, steel renewal is required where the gauged thickness is less than
tnet + 0,5 mm. Where the gauged thickness is within the range tnet + 0,5 mm and tnet + 1,0 mm, coating (applied in accordance with the
coating Manufacturers requirements) or annual gauging may be adopted as an alternative to steel renewal.
For the internal structure of pontoon hatch covers, thickness gauging is required when plating renewal is to be carried out or when this is
deemed necessary, at the discretion of the Surveyor, on the basis of the plating corrosion or deformation condition. In these cases, steel
renewal for the internal structures is required where the gauged thickness is less than tnet.
For ships indicated in Ch 1, Sec 2, [4.3.2] to Ch 1, Sec 2, [4.3.7], contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2004, the renewal
criteria of forward and side hatch coamings on exposed decks in position 1, as defined in ILCC, are as follows:
steel renewal is required where the gauged thickness is less than tnet + 0,5 mm. Where the gauged thickness is within the range
tnet + 0,5 mm and tnet + 1,0 mm, coating (applied in accordance with the coating Manufacturers requirements) or annual gauging may be
adopted as an alternative to steel renewal. Coating is to be maintained in good condition, as defined in Sec 2, [2.2.11].
For ships indicated in Ch 1, Sec 2, [4.3.2] to Ch 1, Sec 2, [4.3.7], contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2004, the renewal
criteria of all cargo hatch covers are as follows:
for single skin hatch covers and for the plating of double skin hatch covers, steel renewal is required where the gauged thickness
is less than tnet + 0,5 mm. Where the gauged thickness is within the range tnet + 0,5 mm and tnet + 1,0 mm, coating (applied in
accordance with the coating Manufacturers requirements) or annual gauging may be adopted as an alternative to steel renewal. Coating is
to be maintained in good condition, as defined in Sec 2, [2.2.11].
For the internal structure of double skin hatch covers, thickness gauging is required when plating renewal is to be carried out or when
this is deemed necessary, at the discretion of the Surveyor, on the basis of the plating corrosion or deformation condition. In these cases,
steel renewal for the internal structures is required where the gauged thickness is less than tnet.
27
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Table 8 : Local and global acceptance criteria for oil tankers (given in % of wastage)
Group of
items
Description of items
1
Isolated area
2
Item
3
Group
4
Zone
10
25
20
10
25
20
20
15
10
-
web
flange
25
20
20
15
10
-
25
20
20
15
10
-
15
DECK ZONE
(1)
web
flange
Deck longitudinal girders
(1)
25
20
15
25
20
20
15
15
-
25
20
15
25
20
20
15
15
-
10
25
20
10
10
25
20
20
15
10
-
11
25
20
20
15
10
-
12
Bottom girders
web
flange
25
20
20
15
10
-
28
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Contd
OTHER ITEMS
13
25
20
25
20
15
20
14
25
20
25
20
15
20
15
25
20
25
20
15
20
16
25
20
25
20
15
20
25
20
20
15
15
15
25
25
20
30
25
20
20
15
20
15
15
-
Cross tie
17
web
flange
brackets / stiffeners
Transverse bulkheads (3)
plating
18
(1)
(2)
(3)
stringer web
stringer flange
stiffener web
stiffener flange
29
FP7-SST-RTD-1
4.5.2.
MINOAS 233715
This criterion is applicable to ships having a length greater than 120 metres.
In addition to the evaluation of structural elements according to the local and global
strength criteria, the structural items contributing to the longitudinal strength of the
ship, such as deck and bottom plating, deck and bottom girders, etc., are also
to be assessed with regard to their buckling strength. The values shown in Tab 9
are not to be exceeded.
The minimum thickness will be specially considered for ships built with excess hull
girder section modulus.
ITEMS
RATIO
235
315
s/t
56,0
51,0
49,0
20,0
18,0
17,5
Longitudinals
web
hw / tw
56,0
51,0
49,0
symmetrical flange
bf / tf
34,0
30,0
29,0
bf
17,0
15,0
14,5
4.5.3.
hw / tw
/ tf
Symbols:
s : longitudinal spacing, in mm;
bf : flange breadth, in mm;
Pitting
The maximum acceptable depth for isolated pits is 35% of the as-built thickness.
For areas with different pitting intensity, the intensity diagrams shown in Fig 4
are to be used to identify the percentage of affected areas.
For areas having a pitting intensity of 50% or more, the maximum acceptable average
depth of pits is 20% of the as-built thickness. For intermediate values between
isolated pits and 50% of affected area, the interpolation between 35% and 20% is
made according to Tab 10.
In addition, the thickness outside the pits in the area considered is to be assessed
according to the local and global strength criteria and to the buckling strength
criterion.
Application of filler material (plastic or epoxy compounds) is recommended as a
means to stop or reduce the corrosion process, but it is not considered an acceptable
repair for pitting exceeding the maximum allowable wastage limits. Welding repairs
may be accepted when performed in accordance with procedures agreed with
the Society
30
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Table 10: Pitting intensity and corresponding maximum acceptable average depth of
pitting
MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE
AVERAGE
PITTING DEPTH (% of the
as-built thickness)
Isolated
35,0
33,5
10
32,0
15
30,5
20
29,0
25
27,5
30
26,0
40
23,0
50
20,0
31
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
32
FP7-SST-RTD-1
5.
MINOAS 233715
The following Figures are given to facilitate the visualization of requirements given in
the table.
These figures show typical arrangements of cargo ships, bulk carriers and oil tankers.
Figures are not intended to cover all the different cases. However, the figures
provided here may be used as a guidance for ships other than those here illustrated.
Figure 5: Transverse section of a general cargo ship
Measure
Point Symbol
Measurements are to be taken on both port and starboard sides of the selected transverse section
33
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Measurements are to be taken on both port and starboard sides of the selected transverse section
Measurement are to be taken on both port and starboard sides of the selected transverse section
34
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
(1) Three sections at L/4, L/2, 3L/4 of hatch cover length, including:
one measurement of each hatch cover plate and skirt plate
measurements of adjacent beams and stiffeners
one measurement of coaming plates and coaming flange, each side
(2) Measurements of both ends of hatch cover skirt plate, coaming plate and coaming flange
(3) One measurement of one out of three hatch coaming brackets and bars, on both sides and both ends
35
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
36
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
37
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Figure 14: Locations of measurements on web frame rings and longitudinal elements
of oil tankers
38
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
39
FP7-SST-RTD-1
6.
MINOAS 233715
When dealing with any hull damage, defect or failure consideration needs to be given
to the location of the damage and its extent, as well as severity, age, size, type and
general condition of the ship. These factors will influence the nature and extent of any
repairs.
Hull defects are in many cases preventable with timely maintenance and an
understanding of their causes. Understanding the typical causes of defects is important
as it will also help to locate defects.
The following can be used to define, group into category the type of hull defect which
can be found in the hull of a ship.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Structural overload
Design related
Workmanship related
Vibration related
Corrosion
Pitting
Definition
Structural overload
Structural overload is caused by placing greater stress on the ship than it was designed for.
This category of defect may be the result of the following:
Grounding
Collision
40
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Workmanship related
Vibration related
Corrosion
The type of corrosion encountered in a location will fall into one of the following types:
General wastage
Localised corrosion.
Local coating breakdowns are more likely in:
Areas which are hard to access and therefore maintain
Areas such as erection joints where weld profiles may be less smooth (particular attention
should be paid to such areas in ballast tanks)
Areas of higher stresses.
It should be noted that corrosion rates are accelerated in areas of higher stresses (corrosion
under stress). In turn, the more a structure corrodes the greater are the stresses on the remaining
sound structure and therefore the corrosion rate increases. Conversely, if the stresses in an area
are reduced the rate of corrosion is also reduced.
Pitting
41
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
The various types of deficiencies and where they may occur will be discussed in more
details.
6.2.
The following areas where structural defects might occur should have special
attention at during survey:
(a) Cargo Tanks
Main deck deckhead: corrosion and fractures.
Buckling in web plate of the underdeck web frame and fractures at end of
bracket toes.
Transverse bulkhead horizontal stringers: fractures in way of cut-outs and at
end bracket toe connections to inner hull and longitudinal bulkhead.
Longitudinal bulkhead transverse web frames: fractures at end bracket toe
Connection to inner bottom.
Necking effect of longitudinal web plating at longitudinal bulkhead plating.
For plane transverse bulkheads, transverse bulkhead vertical stiffeners
connected to inner bottom: for vertically corrugated bulkheads, corrugation
connection to lower shelf plate and bulkhead plating connection to inner
bottom:
Fractures caused by misalignment and excessive fit-up gap.
Transverse bulkheads at the forward and after boundaries of the cargo space:
Fractures in way of inner bottom.
Pitting and grooving of inner bottom plating.
(b) Double Hull Ballast Spaces
Main deck deckhead: corrosion and fractures.
Inner hull plate and stiffener: coating breakdown.
Buckling of the web plate in the upper and lower part of the web frame.
Fractures at the side shell longitudinal connection to web frames due to
fatigue.
Corrosion and fractures at knuckle joints in inner hull at forward and after
parts of ship.
Corrosion and fractures at the juncture where the sloped inner hull is
connected to the inner bottom.
Fractures at side and inner hull longitudinal connections to transverse
bulkheads due to fatigue and/or high relative deflections.
Inner bottom deckhead corrosion at inner bottom.
Bottom corrosion wastage.
Cracks at inner bottom longitudinal connection to double bottom floor web
plating.
Fractures at inner bottom and bottom longitudinal; connection to transverse
Watertight floor due to high relative defections.
42
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
43
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
44
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
45
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
46
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
7.2. Conditions
7.3. Procedures
47
FP7-SST-RTD-1
8.
MINOAS 233715
Introduction
8.1.
Ultrasonic Testing
The need for surveys and fault diagnosis in a wide field of industrial applications has
lead to the development of various Non Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques and
equipment for specific type of fields [www.ndt.org]. Thickness measurements of
metal constructions are essential for the verification of the structures integrity as is
also the demand for fast and reliable testing of large constructions. The most widely
used techniques for non destructive thickness measurements in industry are listed in
the sequel (a detailed analysis may be found in
http://www.ndted.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/communitycollege.htm).
All methods use the measurement of the time of travel of ultrasound within the
material with known acoustic properties for the calculation of its thickness. The use of
piezoelectric transducers is widely used for its easy creation of ultrasounds within the
specimen although good contact with the specimen is required since the ultrasound is
induced through mechanical coupling of probe to the material.
48
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
the steel part and the ultrasound travels through the specimen. For its detection the
opposite effect is used by the same piezoelectric element or a different receiver.
Typical waveforms appear in the following figure.
49
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Corrosion
For the quantization of the corrosion it is common to visually compare the area with
various Measle charts, depending on corrosion type (localized, scattered or linear). A
list of examples follows.
50
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
8.3.
As a general rule the Class surveyor, considering the Class Rules for the particular
type of ship, dictates for the survey type. After the ships preparation by the ship yards,
the UT operator and the appointed Class surveyor examine the ship's plans and its
history regarding former surveys, modifications and repairs that may had, and also the
kind of cargo that used to transfer. Depending on ship's load conditions, former UT
51
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
measurements and repairs, it is possible to isolate the critical parts of the ship's
structure that need maintenance. Considering the practical inability for examining the
whole ship's structure and parts, this is a valuable pre-process stage that its main aim
is to minimize the metal surfaces and parts that need to be examined, thus minimizing
surveys time, while maintaining safety rules. However this process encapsulates in a
significant degree the experience of the Class surveyor and the UT operator, rendering
the survey not factual.
The UT operator before proceeding with the main stage of the survey, that is the
thickness measurements of the defined locations, must ensure the following
conditions are met for the personnels safety
1. Informing of captain and/or chief mate and other teams that may work on
board, about the places that will be visited and the corresponding time
schedule.
2. In enclosed, isolated and/or dangerous places the UTM technician must be
accompanied of at least one more with adequate equipment.
3. Before entering inside any tank and void space, it is necessary to check the
quantity of oxygen that is contained in space (>21% per volume), especially
for fuel tanks and cargo tanks (tankers) must be covered the criterions that
mentioned at the International Safety Guide for oil Tankers and Terminals
(ISGOTT: Ch.10 Entry into & work in enclosed spaces. During stay inside
tanks must be provided adequate ventilation. At the entrance of the tank must
remain a crew member, responsible of the safety of those inside.)
4. The UTM technician must never enter inside cargo holds during
loading/unloading and ballast tanks during ballasting / deballasting.
5. Lighting must be natural where available, i.e. by opening hatch covers in cargo
holds or all small hatches in way of a tank. When natural light is not enough or
not available, the crew must provide the appropriate means (i.e. cargo lights)
for satisfactory lighting. UTM technician must always carry a personal
waterproof torchlight in enclosed spaces with artificial lighting.
6. Protection of means of access.
7. Means of escape & proceedings of rescue.
8. When the time schedule of spaces to be visited is being prepared,
consideration must be taken of the existing temperature levels (i.e. at hot
climates (tropics) visiting exposed spaces during noontime must be avoided).
8.3.1.
After the initiation process the UT operator proceeds to the thickness measurements.
The preparation of the surface for the measurements to be accurate is the most time
and effort consuming operation.
Since the majority of thickness measurement equipment use ultrasonic waves, the
ultrasonic probe (transmitter / receiver) must be in good contact with the specimen, so
that the waves may pass from the probe to the steel plate easily without great loss and
reflections for an accurate and reliable measurement. The most common tasks for the
measurement execution are ordered as:
52
FP7-SST-RTD-1
8.3.2.
MINOAS 233715
Surface Preparation
i.
v. Apply a layer of couplant (grease, water, etc.). This layer acts as acoustic
impedance matching between the UT probe and the steel part minimizing
reflections from the contact area allowing the UT wave to travel through the
steel part.
53
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
8.3.3.
i.
Measurement execution
ii. Record the thickness at the corresponding exact point on the prepared
drawings.
54
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Figure 26: Measured points and marking for Class Surveyor's reference
i.
The measurements that will be recorded to UTM tables are the average of
multiple readings thus giving a general indication of the plate concerned.
ii. In case of there is a deviation between e.g. a plates original thickness as came
up from U.T. Measurements and same plates original thickness which derives
from vessels drawings, then prior of any action, an immediate notification
should be made to Owners Representative and LR attending Surveyor in
order for him to conclude and/or consult timely for any further action.
iii. Re-test measuring instruments every three (3) hours of continuous operation
for proper functioning and correct measurement indications.
8.4.
Reporting
During the measurement procedure the UT operator should manually log the data for
the specific measured part to the corresponding drawing so as a representative
thickness profile is created. The plans are then consulted for the original steel
thicknesses of the particular part or any available former measurements and in case of
large deviations or substantial corrosion the Owner Representative and Class surveyor
should be informed before further actions are taken.
In general the reporting operations required follow:
8.5.
55
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Thickness measurements, depending on the vessel's type and associate Class, are
reported in report forms. According to Thickness Measurement & Close up Survey
Guidance, Revision 5.4 (April 2009) by LR, and in Lloyds Register Thickness
Measurements v.3.1 the report is to include the following (e.g. for single skin bulk
carriers):
1. Table/index of contents.
2. Thickness Measurement report - General Particulars.
3. Drawings indicating the taken thickness, drafted with the use of CAD
programs.
4. Tables of results for the measured members. The tables are designed by
appropriate computer program.
5. The tabulated results
6. In general the final report is submitted to the attending surveyor prior of
vessels departure but in any case no later than 2 weeks after measurements is
completed.
Upon completion of survey and delivery of report the survey file is to contain, apart of
the information mentioned in paragraph 1, the following:
1. The rough drawings used onboard to mark the onsite.
2. Original thickness measurement booklet.
3. Any additional information and document considered being of useful future
reference.
4. Evidence of the final approved (stamped) report (i.e. fully stamped copy, copy
of the 1st (gen. par.) stamped page etc.). The described evidence is collected
either directly by the surveyor or by the shipping company.
56
FP7-SST-RTD-1
9.
MINOAS 233715
Bottom survey means the examination of the outside of the ships bottom and related items. This
examination may be carried out with the ship either in dry dock or afloat. (see RINA Rules Pt A Ch 2
Sec 2 item 5 and Pt A Ch 3 Sec 6)
57
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
58
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
59
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
Extent of measurements
Plating
Stiffeners
Suspect area
Pattern of measurements
5 point pattern over 1 square
metre
3 measurements each in line
across web and flange
TYPE OF SURVEY
INTERMEDIATE (2,5 years)
Measurements on suspect areas
Additional measurements
Additional measurements
Additional measurements
Other maeasurments
surveyor satisfaction
at
the
As far as the TM extension and location for the Renewal survey is concerned they are
to be done in accordance to the requirements indicated in the following table.
60
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
age > 15
Suspect areas
A minimum of three transverse
sections in way of cargo spaces
within 0,5 L amidship (3)
Internals in forepeak and after peak
tanks
All cargo hold hatch covers and
coamings (plating and stiffeners)
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Acceptance criteria stipulate limits of wastage which are to be taken into account for
reinforcements, repairs or renewals of steel structure. These limits are generally
expressed for each structural item as a maximum percentage of acceptable wastage
(W). When the maximum percentage of wastage is indicated, the minimum acceptable
thickness (tmin) is that resulting from applying this percentage to the rule thickness
(trule), according to the following formula:
tmin = (1-W/100)trule
61
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
However, when the rule thickness is not available, the as-built thickness can be used.
Only for criteria related to an item the Society may establish a list of renewal
thicknesses taylored to the different structural items. In such a case these thicknesses
are used in lieu of the minimum thicknesses calculated from the percentage of
wastage.
Each structural item is to be assessed according to four different criteria which vary
with regard to the domain under which it is considered, namely:
an isolated area, which is meant as a part of a single structural item. This criterion
takes into consideration very local aspects such as grooving of a plate or web, or
local severe corrosion; however, it is not to be used for pitting for which separate
criteria are considered 4.5
an item, which is meant as an individual element such as a plate, a stiffener, a
web, etc. This criterion takes into consideration the average condition of the item,
which is assessed by determining its average thickness using the various
measurements taken on the same item
a group of items, which is meant as a set of elements of the same nature (plates,
longitudinals, girders) contributing either to the longitudinal global strength of the
ship in a given zone or to the global strength of other primary transverse elements
not contributing to the ship longitudinal strength, e. g. bulkheads, hatch covers,
web frames
a zone, which is meant as all and only longitudinal elements contributing to the
longitudinal strength of the ship; in this regard, the three main zones are defined as
deck zone, neutral axis zone and bottom zone. This criterion takes into
consideration the average condition of all groups of items belonging to the same
zone
62
FP7-SST-RTD-1
10.
10.1.
MINOAS 233715
Any damage in association with wastage over the allowable limits (including
buckling, grooving, detachment or fracture), or extensive areas of wastage over the
allowable limits, which affects or, in the opinion of the surveyor, will affect the
vessels structural watertight or weathertight integrity, is to be promptly and
thoroughly repaired.
Areas to be considered for a typical bulk carrier are to include:
Side shell frames,
Their end attachments and adjacent shell plating,
deck structure and deck plating,
watertight bulkheads,
hatch covers and
Coamings.
Areas to be considered for a typical oil tanker carrier are to include:
10.2.
63
FP7-SST-RTD-1
10.3.
MINOAS 233715
Oxygen-meter, breathing apparatus, lifeline, riding belts with rope and hook
and whistles together with instructions and guidelines on their use are to be
made available during the survey.
For oil tankers and chemical tankers, an explosimeter is to be provided
Special survey Typical hull inspection
The following are the general requirements for special survey and the list is not
exhaustive of the full requirements but considers areas applicable to the hull.
10.4.
Hull and related piping are to be in satisfactory condition fit for any another
new period of class of 5years subject to maintenance and operation and
periodical surveys being carried out.
One docking survey to coincide with special survey
Overall survey to be carried out to ascertain any significant corrosion,
deformation, fractures, damages and other structural deterioration.
All spaces within the hull and superstructure are to be examined
Internal of tanks are to be examined
For ballast water tanks, condition of the corrosion prevention system where
provided in the salt-water ballast tanks is to be examined.
Double bottom, deep, ballast, peak and other tanks, including cargo holds
assigned also for the carriage of salt water ballast, are to be tested with a head
of liquid to the top of air pipes or to near the top of hatches for ballast/cargo
holds.
All bilge and ballasting piping systems are to be examined and operationally
tested to working pressure to ensure tightness and condition remains
satisfactory to the satisfaction of the surveyor.
Areas of tanks and cargo holds where coatings are found in good condition,
the extent of close up surveys may be specially considered.
Docking survey - Shell examination
64
FP7-SST-RTD-1
11.
MINOAS 233715
The extent of the Classification Requirements elaborated in the previous sections, sets
the reasons for constructing an elaborated plan-methodology that needs to be followed
during the re-engineering of the survey procedures. The adaptation of the existing
rules that apply to each type of survey and each type and size of vessel will be the task
within the framework of D1.2 Tentative Draft Rules for acceptance of a Hull Robot
Inspection, which will set up and clarify the rules applicable to survey tasks by
making use of the holistic approach used by the means of MINOAS system.
Results from the elaboration of the existing rules (traditional survey) show the variety
of the cases needed to be examined in order to set up the specifications for the
ongoing of the technical tasks extraction of quantititative rather than qualitative
criteria for the execution of tasks. It has been agreed upon, during the evolution of
T1.1, that the amount of the information to be examined to extract the aforementioned
specifications is large compared to the expected profits and is rather recommended to
narrow down the extraction of the quantititative criteria needed by utilizing a specific
application example - by choosing a specific vessel type and size.
The criteria set out in order to reach a decision on the vessel type were:
a. the complexity of the structure is required to be the most challenging
one which means that the vessel type should include most (if not all)
of the difficulties/obstacles that could be faced during a vessel survey
by a robot, so that locomotion and reachability difficulties will be
resolved within the work of this application example.
b. the size of the vessel is chosen based on the availability of the vessel
that will host/accommodate the execution of the pilot testing and
experimental verification of the results
c. the amount of information required for the surveyor to reach a
decision has been kept to the mean expected values met during most
of the applications at hand. That is, the number of images & UT
measurements has been chosen (through the choice of the vessel type
& size) to be near the values expected in real-life applications but it
is expected that it will not be limited in other cases due to the
availability of the resources (power supply is assumed to be available
by the same metrics/values in all real life applications).
This specialization intends solely to narrow down the specifications set down by the
Classification Societies (following the traditional survey Requirements followed by
humans) which will result in the formalization and the equipping of the robotic
platforms. As the choice of the application example is made for the most generic case
(the one that carries most of the difficulties to be faced when facing traditional
surveys) it is expected that minimum or none adaptation of the methodology, the
formulation of the platforms or other subsequent results will be needed but will only
65
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
remain as a matter of scaling down (or up) of the produced results to match up to the
needs met in different applications in practice.
It is has been agreed that the Consortium efforts will be focused on the requirements
stemming from the structure of a PANAMAX - Bulk Carrier vessel type and that a
draft inspection protocol will be assumed (that will also serve as an application
example scenario) so that the sequence of tasks and the information flow will be
clarified (& facilitated) for the needs of the subsequent tasks.
It consists of three sequencially executed Phases, namely:
Phase A: 1st stage of video/image grabbing to provide an overall impression of
the vessel status and input for visual evaluation
Phase B: 2nd stage of detailed video grabbing (up to surveyors satisfaction) it
is identified in the following algorithmic implementation by making use of a
looping condition.
Phase C: Execution of UT measurements at required locations (by the
Classification Requirements & indicated positions by the surveyor)
The surveyor may go on-board during the final phase of the execution protocol
at his/her own free-will to assess the results of both the previous phases and
the execution of the last one.
The protocol formulation is given through the sequence of these steps:
1. Grabbing images/video from the entire vessel. The entire vessel will be
covered by the robots (each locomotion ability used based on the activation
area) that will transmit images/video to a control station within which the
surveyor resides. This way he/she will have an overall view of the vessels
status within a very short period of time
2. <Begin Loop>
a. Comparison of the images grabbed with images from DataBases
that will produce the level of corrosion/pitting. The goal of the
comparison will indicate the percentage of pitting through means of
image processing tools. This pre-processing of the gathered
information aims in assisting the surveyor in reaching decisions similar
to how many more and in which places do we need to take more UT
measurements to reach conclusive results regarding the vessels
structural integrity?. It is foreseen that the images grabbed in the
previous step will be part of the vessels archives and will be available
for future comparisons in future surveys. In cases where this does not
apply the images will be drawn from the Classes DataBases.
b. Extraction of Hot-Spots areas where additive information
(through UT means) will be required
66
FP7-SST-RTD-1
MINOAS 233715
67