You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

160 / Friday, August 18, 2006 / Notices 47833

interim member, will provide relief to Room. The text of the proposed rule should be required to use his or her
members who encounter serious change is set forth below. Proposed new handheld terminal.
emergencies, as well as offer a financial language is italicized. In today’s options marketplace, orders
incentive for interim members to enter are increasingly routed to and executed
Rule 935—ANTE. Allocation of on the Amex and the other options
into special transfer agreements.
Executed Contracts exchanges electronically. At the
IV. Conclusion Exchange, the ANTE system provides
(a)–(b) No Change.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to for the automatic matching and
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the Commentary execution of market and marketable
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2006– .01 No Change limit orders within eligible size limit
27), as amended, is approved. .02 Floor brokers when interacting parameters (i.e., the ‘‘auto-match size’’).
For the Commission, by the Division of with orders and quotes in the ANTE The auto-match size is the maximum
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated system are required to use their order size that can be automatically
authority.14 handheld terminals. matched with orders on the book or the
Nancy M. Morris, * * * * * disseminated quote. Orders for less than
Secretary. the auto-match size are automatically
[FR Doc. E6–13636 Filed 8–17–06; 8:45 am]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s matched at the disseminated price up to
Statement of the Purpose of, and the disseminated size. The ANTE
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule system then allocates the executed
Change contracts among the participants to the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE trade, pursuant to the algorithm set forth
In its filing with the Commission, the
COMMISSION in Amex Rule 935—ANTE.
Exchange included statements Floor brokers, in order to receive an
[Release No. 34–54310; File No. SR–Amex– concerning the purpose of, and basis for, ANTE allocation for transactions in
2006–71] the proposed rule change. The text of ANTE, are required to use their
these statements may be examined at handheld terminals so that the order
Self-Regulatory Organizations; the places specified in Item III below. trades against the ANTE Central Book.
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice The Exchange has prepared summaries, Floor brokers that execute orders in the
of Filing and Order Granting set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, trading crowd are accordingly outside
Accelerated Approval of Proposed of the most significant aspects of such the ANTE system. Therefore, the ANTE
Rule Change Relating to Floor Broker statements. or electronic marketplace and the
HandHeld Terminals trading crowd may have different depth
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
August 11, 2006. Statement of the Purpose of, and the of market at any particular point in
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule time. The Exchange believes that this is
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Change the nature of the ‘‘hybrid’’ market model
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 that currently exists. As a result, a floor
1. Purpose broker who desires to access the depth
notice is hereby given that on August 2,
2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC The Exchange proposes to add new of market available in ANTE by
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Commentary .02 to Amex Rule 935— interacting with orders and quotes, must
Securities and Exchange Commission ANTE to clarify that Exchange floor submit his or her order through the
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule brokers are required to use their handheld terminal. Working an order in
change as described in Items I and II handheld terminals when interacting the trading crowd does not access the
below, which Items have been with orders and quotes in accessing the depth of market that may exist in the
substantially prepared by the Exchange. Exchange’s electronic options ANTE system. In addition, the
The Commission is publishing this marketplace or ‘‘ANTE.’’ The market introduction of RROTs and SROTs
notice to solicit comments on the depth at the Exchange in ANTE and the further necessitates direct floor broker
proposed rule change from interested trading crowd may differ, due to the access to the ANTE market, since the
persons and is approving the proposal differences inherent in an automatic specialist is unable to match a trade in
on an accelerated basis. execution system and an auction the trading crowd with an RROT or
market. With the recent approval and SROT quote. Therefore, the Exchange
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s near-term implementation of a remote proposes to adopt Commentary .02 to
Statement of the Terms of Substance of market maker program (i.e., Remote Amex Rule 935—ANTE to clarify that a
the Proposed Rule Change Registered Options Traders (‘‘RROTs’’) floor broker accessing the electronic
The Exchange proposes to adopt and Supplemental Registered Options marketplace available through ANTE by
Commentary .02 to Amex Rule 935— Traders (‘‘SROTs’’)),3 as well as the interacting with orders and quotes must
ANTE to clarify that floor brokers, when ‘‘hybrid’’ market structure for options at submit such order(s) via his or her
interacting with orders and quotes in the Exchange, a floor broker may receive handheld terminal.
the ANTE System, are required to use different execution sizes based on 2. Statutory Basis
their handheld terminals. whether the order is routed
The text of the proposed rule change electronically or walked into the trading The Exchange believes that the
is available on the Exchange’s Web site crowd. As a result, the Exchange proposed rule change is consistent with
at (http://www.amex.com), at the believes that in order to maintain a fair Section 6(b) of the Act,4 in general, and
principal office of the Exchange, and at and orderly market, a floor broker who furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
the Commission’s Public Reference desires to access the ANTE system of the Act,5 in particular, in that it is
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

designed to prevent fraudulent and


13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 53652
manipulative acts and practices, to
14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). (April 13, 2006), 71 FR 20422 (April 20, 2006) and
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
53635 (April 12, 2006), 71 FR 20144 (April 19,
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2006). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:35 Aug 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1
47834 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 160 / Friday, August 18, 2006 / Notices

promote just and equitable principles of the Commission’s Public Reference For the Commission, by the Division of
trade, to remove impediments to and Room. Copies of such filing also will be Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
perfect the mechanisms of a free and available for inspection and copying at authority.10
open market and a national market the principal office of the Amex. All Nancy M. Morris,
system, and, in general, to protect comments received will be posted Secretary.
investors and the public interest. without change; the Commission does [FR Doc. E6–13637 Filed 8–17–06; 8:45 am]
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s not edit personal identifying BILLING CODE 8010–01–P

Statement on Burden on Competition information from submissions. You


should submit only information that
The Exchanges believes that the you wish to make available publicly. All SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
proposed rule change does not impose submissions should refer to File COMMISSION
any burden on competition that is not Number SR–Amex–2006–71 and should [Release No. 34–54311; File No. SR–CBOE–
necessary or appropriate in furtherance be submitted on or before September 8, 2005–103]
of the purposes of the Act. 2006.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Self-Regulatory Organizations;
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Statement on Comments on the Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change Received From Incorporated; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Proposed Rule Change and
Members, Participants or Others
The Commission finds that the Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Amend
No written comments were solicited CBOE Rules Relating to the Electronic
or received with respect to the proposed proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the Designated Primary Market Maker
rule change. Program
rules and regulations thereunder
III. Solicitation of Comments applicable to a national securities August 11, 2006.
Interested persons are invited to exchange.6 In particular, the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
submit written data, views and Commission finds that the proposed Securities Exchange Act of 1934
arguments concerning the foregoing, rule change is consistent with Section (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
including whether the proposed rule 6(b)(5) of the Act,7 which requires that notice is hereby given that on December
change is consistent with the Act. an exchange have rules designed, among 5, 2005, the Chicago Board Options
Comments may be submitted by any of other things, to promote just and Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
the following methods: equitable principles of trade, to remove ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
impediments to and perfect the and Exchange Commission
Electronic Comments mechanisms of a free and open market (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
• Use the Commission’s Internet and a national market system, and, in change as described in Items I, II and III
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ general, to protect investors and the below, which Items have been prepared
rules/sro.shtml); or public interest. The Commission by CBOE. On August 11, 2006, the
• Send an e-mail to rule- believes that the proposal should help Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
comments@sec.gov. Please include File to promote just and equitable principles proposed rule change. The Commission
Number SR–Amex–2006–71 on the of trade and remove impediments to and is publishing this notice to solicit
subject line. perfect the mechanisms of a free and comments on the proposed rule change,
open market by clarifying current as amended, from interested persons.
Paper Comments
requirements for floor broker access to
• Send paper comments in triplicate the liquidity on ANTE, the Exchange’s I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, electronic options marketplace. Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Proposed Rule Change
The Commission finds good cause for
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., The Exchange proposes to amend
approving this proposed rule change
Washington, DC 20549–1090. CBOE rules relating to the Electronic
before the thirtieth day after the
All submissions should refer to File Designated Primary Market Maker (‘‘e-
publication of notice thereof in the
Number SR–Amex–2006–71. This file DPM’’) Program. The text of the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
number should be included on the proposed rule change is set forth below.
19(b)(2) of the Act.8 The proposal does
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Proposed additions are in italics, and
not raise any new or novel regulatory
Commission process and review your proposed deletions are in brackets.
issues and merely codifies a current
comments more efficiently, please use
requirement for floor broker access to * * * * *
only one method. The Commission will
ANTE.
post all comments on the Commission’s Rule 8.92. Electronic DPM Program
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ V. Conclusion (a)–(b) No change.
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the (c) Allocation of Option Classes. The
submission, all subsequent It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Board of Directors or a committee
amendments, all written statements Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the designated by the Board of Directors
with respect to the proposed rule proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2006– shall grant e-DPMs allocations in option
change that are filed with the 71) is hereby approved on an classes. Factors to be considered in
Commission, and all written accelerated basis. granting allocations include
communications relating to the performance, capacity, performance
proposed rule change between the 6 In approving this rule change, the Commission
commitments, efficiency,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Commission and any person, other than notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s competitiveness, and operational
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
those that may be withheld from the formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
public in accordance with the 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
available for inspection and copying in 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:35 Aug 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

You might also like