Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Introduction: In Mexico, management of penetrating abdominal trauma does not follow algorithms of Trauma Center LevelI because
our limitations and laparotomies are inevitable in this context. Is it possible to use some degree of leukocytosis to suspect intraabdominal
injury?
Methods: We carried out a retrospective, descriptive and analytical study that included patients with penetrating abdominal trauma who
underwent exploratory laparotomy. We excluded patients with severe soft tissue damage to extremities, chest cavity, fractures, or central
nervous system damage. We divided patients into twogroups: groupI (therapeutic laparotomy) and groupII (nontherapeutic laparotomy).
Dependent variables were age, gender, type of injury, number of wounds, peripheral injuries, time lapse (between occurrence of injury
and taking of blood samples), mean grade of leukocytosis, percentage of neutrophils, leukocytosis 12,500/mm3, and hemoperitoneum.
We compared variables between groups using Pearson 2 test and Student t test, and percentages as summary of measures.
Results: We included 231patients: groupI159patients and groupII72patients. Overall leukocytosis was 13,200 mm3 and
neutrophils were in the range of 70.3%; 26% of patients did not have leukocytosis upon arrival and evaluation; however, they underwent
laparotomy due to peritoneal irritation. Leukocytosis 12,500/mm3 was statistically significant in patients with intraabdominal injuries
(74.2% vs. 27.7%, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Leukocytosis 12,500/mm3 may be an early serum marker in intraabdominal injuries due to penetrating abdominal trauma.
Key words: standard leukocyte count, predictive value, laboratory testing, leukocytosis, injuries.
Introduction
In Ciudad Juarez, penetrating trauma due to civil violence
and narcoviolence is a serious public health problem.1 This
condition is addressed in three referral hospitals. The most
influential is the Hospital General de Ciudad Juarez where
the majority of survivors of aggressions are admitted and
has become the point of referral in the city and throughout
the state.2-4
Abdominal trauma is a serious abdominal injury affecting all layers of the abdominal wall to the parietal peritoneum and is a common cause of significant disability and
mortality during productive ages.5-7 Currently, treatment of
abdominal trauma is twofold: surgical and conservative.
The category of patients where surgical intervention is imperative is clear (shock, evisceration, peritonitis), whereas
other patients can be treated conservatively and successfully.8-10
Algorithms of approach in trauma centers are established
in Level I Trauma Centers in countries with all the technological resources [computed tomography (CT], serial scans
such as Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma
(FAST), selective angiography and even laparoscopy) and
trained personnel.8-10 However, in second-level centers in
developing countries, there are shortages of these resources
for the appropriate approach to patients with doubtful diagnoses.
In our setting, the clinic is essential in the evaluation of
trauma patients, especially abdominal trauma. This assessment is useful in cooperative patients, those not under the
effects of toxic substances (drugs, alcohol), and patients
without other associated injuries (fractures, traumatic brain
or spinal cord injuries) and, although initially intraabdominal injury is not ruled out, it is helpful during primary and
secondary evaluation in the first 12-24 h.
Given the scenario of penetrating abdominal trauma
where it is verified that the peritoneal cavity or the retroperitoneum or both were penetrated, in patients with clear
data of hemodynamic instability and peritoneal irritation,
exploratory laparotomy is mandatory, without the need for
additional tests or serial scans. However, hemoperitoneum
arising from the abdominal wall is sufficient to irritate the
peritoneum. Pain at the site of injury entry and the coexistence of associated injuries are a frequent cause of confusion about the injury in an intraabdominal organ.11 With the
advent of CT12,13 and FAST in trauma cases,14 conservative
management has been established in penetrating injuries
with a high success rate; however, lack of availability of
these resources limits the application of treatment algorithms, making them almost not feasible.
In the literature search we performed, early serum markers in penetrating abdominal trauma have not been extensively studied,15-19 and the average leukocytosis related to
penetrating abdominal trauma is unknown and much less
if this measurement is related to the injury. For this reason, we evaluated the range of preoperative leukocytosis in
penetrating abdominal trauma. Its predictive character according to the severity of the intraabdominal damage was
found and we evaluated when correlating an early marker
of intraabdominal injury with data from the clinical examination. A prediction can be made whether or not there is
intraabdominal injury.
Methods
We carried out a retrospective and descriptive study in the
Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Ciudad Juarez, which is a teaching hospital center and trauma
center concentrated in the city. We evaluated patients admitted with a diagnosis of penetrating abdominal trauma
and who underwent exploratory laparotomy for this reason
between April 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010. To obtain
information and selection of participants, we requested all
electronic records of hospital admissions and discharges
with a diagnosis of penetrating abdominal trauma. Prior
approval was obtained from the Bioethics and Research
Committee of the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez
and the Committee on Trauma of the General Hospital of
Ciudad Juarez. We included patients with penetrating abdominal injury in the peritoneal cavity caused by firearm
and/or knife injury and who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy for suspected intraabdominal organ injury, with time between injury and the start of surgery <6
Results
We included 231 patients; 218 (94.4%) were male
(male:female ratio 17:1). Overall average age was 27 years
(8.9 years). Figure 1 shows the number of patients according to age group. Group I included 159 (68.8%) patients and
Daz-Rosales JD et al.
Number of patients
120
99
100
80
60
55
48
40
27
20
0
2
14-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50
Age groups
Figure 1. Age groups affected. Source: Servicio de Ciruga, Hospital
General de Ciudad Jurez.
%
16.9
13.4
12.5
12.1
10.4
9.1
6.1
5.2
5.2
3.5
3.0
2.6
Table 2. Laboratory results according to laparotomy carried out in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma
at the Hospital General de Ciudad Jurez
General
Type of LAPE
Characteristic
Mean (SD)
Range
Group I
Group II
*p
Leukocytes
Neutrophils
Hemoglobin (g/dl)
Hematocrit (%)
Hemoperitoneum (ml)
Leukocytosis
12,500/mm3
13.2 ( 3.7)
70.3 (10.3)
13.6 ( 1.8)
40.9 ( 5.4)
5 - 23
33 - 90
8 - 19
25 - 62
14 ( 3.4)
71.2 ( 9.9)
13.6 ( 1.8)
40.5 ( 5.4)
641.6 (652.7)
118 / 159
11.3 ( 3.7)
68.1 ( 10.6)
13.8 ( 1.6)
41.5 ( 5.3)
185.4 (142.4)
20 / 72
0.001
< 0.001
0.273
0.583
< 0.001
< 0.001
Injury due to
knife wound
Group Itherapeutic
55%
82%
Group IInontherapeutic
45%
18%
100%
(n=111)
100%
(n=120)
Total
*p
Firearm
injury
0.0001
*2.
Discussion
As observed in Mexican studies in regard to trauma, males
in the third decade of life are the most affected.1-7 It was
observed that, in Ciudad Juarez, low sociocultural level is
a risk factor for this type of injury. The activities related to
organized crime are also considered high risk for suffering
from this type of injury. The average time from injury to
blood sampling was considered reasonable.
In our center we have a higher rate of penetrating trauma
by firearm (52 vs. 48% in this study), contrary to what is
reported by the major European trauma centers20 and similar to what occurs in the U.S.9 The reason is obviousthe
high rate of drug-related crime along our border is known
worldwide.
Of patients with abdominal trauma included in this study,
31.2% underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy. It is important to mention that patients had injuries spanning all layers
Daz-Rosales JD et al.
Table 4. Organs injured and degree of injury in patients with intraabdominal injuries at
the Hospital General de Ciudad Jurez
Injured organ
Small intestine
Colon
Liver
Stomach
Kidney
Bladder
Spleen
Appendix
Pancreas
Diaphragm
Gallbladder
Duodenum
Ureter
76
74
35
24
21
17
14
4
4
4
3
2
1
I
16%
34%
4%
5%
6%
14%
50%
II
Degree of injury
III
40%
62%
37%
83%
14%
47%
7%
50%
75%
100%
100%
50%
100%
25%
18%
26%
13%
19%
29%
14%
IV
20%
4%
3%
15%
43%
18%
29%
19%
36%
25%
50%
Santucci et al.17 showed that, in blunt abdominal trauma, leukocytosis is associated with severe damage. The
same results were reproduced by this study in the setting
of penetrating abdominal trauma. Chang et al.22 found
that the level of leukocytosis in trauma patients is not related to the mechanism of injury or to the affected organ,
but with the severity of damage with results similar to
ours. Furthermore, these authors concluded that the level
of leukocytosis in these patients does not predict the volume for resuscitation, need for transfusions, or surgery.
Length of hospital stay was consistent with expectations,
i.e., more days required for patients undergoing therapeutic laparotomy than for those who had a nontherapeutic laparotomy. This was probably due to the greater
inflammatory response in the former and also monitoring
for the appearance of complications in patients with organ repair.
In conclusion, leukocytosis is a common finding in the
study of routine hospital laboratory examinations. Therefore, level of leukocytosis may be an early serum marker
for intraabdominal injury in penetrating abdominal trauma.
This information in no way changes the algorithm study of
these patients. We should always be cautious and examine
the patient from a holistic standpoint, taking into account
serious injuries to soft tissues, injuries to blood vessels, and
thoracic and central nervous system involvement. In addition, fractures at any site may elevate the degree of leukocytosis above the expected values in our study for both
groups.
References
1. Daz-Rosales JD, Enrquez-Domnguez L, Arriaga-Carrera JM,
Gutirrez-Ramrez PG. Trauma penetrante en abdomen y trax:
estudio de casos en el Hospital General de Ciudad Jurez. Cir Gen
2009;31:9-13.
2. Daz-Rosales JD, Enrquez-Domnguez L, Arriaga-Carrera JM,
Cabrera-Hinojosa JE, Gutirrez-Ramrez PG. Trauma penetrante
abdominal con lesin en intestino delgado, aislada y asociada a otros
rganos: la relacin respecto a la morbilidad y mortalidad en Ciudad
Jurez Chihuahua. Cir Gen 2009;31:91-96.
3. Enrquez-Domnguez L, Daz-Rosales JD, Arriaga-Carrera JM,
Gutirrez-Ramrez PG, Castillo-Moreno JR, Rivas-Serna J.
Trauma penetrante en colon: comparativa de tratamientos. Cir Gen
2009;31:230-235.
4. Daz Rosales JD, Arriaga-Carrera JM, Enrquez-Domnguez L,
Castillo-Moreno JR, Montes-Castaeda JG. Trauma penetrante
abdominal: comparativa de morbimortalidad en heridas por arma de
fuego y arma punzocortante. Cir Gen 2010;32:24-28.
5. Senado-Lara I, Castro-Mendoza A, Palacio-Vlez F, Vargasvila AL. Experiencia en el manejo del abdomen agudo de origen
traumtico en el Hospital Regional General Ignacio Zaragoza. Cir
Ciruj 2004;72:93-97.
6. Snchez Lozada R, Ortiz Gonzlez J, Soto Villagrn R. Lesiones
abdominales por traumatismo: experiencia de dos aos en un hospital
de tercer nivel. Cir Gen 2002;24:201-205.
7. Pinedo-Onofre JA, Guevara-Torres L, Snchez-Aguilar JM. Trauma
abdominal penetrante. Cir Ciruj 2006;74:431-442.
8. Biffl WL, Moore EE. Management guidelines for penetrating
abdominal trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:609-617.
9. Butt MU, Zacharias N, Velmahos GC. Penetrating abdominal
injuries: management controversies. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg
Med 2009;17:19.
10. Como JJ, Bokhari F, Chiu WC, Duane TM, Holevar MR,
Tandoh MA, et al. Practice management guidelines for selective
nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. J
Trauma 2010;68:721-733.
11. Thacker LK, Parks J, Thal ER. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: is
100,000 RBCs a valid figure for penetrating abdominal trauma? J
Trauma 2007;62:853-857.
12. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Chiu WC, Killeen KL, Hogan GJF,
Scalea TM. Penetrating torso trauma: triple-contrast helical CT in
peritoneal violation and organ injuryA prospective study in 200
patients. Radiology 2004;231:775-784.
13. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Chiu WC, Killeen KL, Scalea TM.
Triple-contrast helical CT in penetrating torso trauma: a prospective
study to determine peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1247-1256.
14. Soto JA, Morales C, Mnera F, Sanabria A, Guevara JM, Surez
T. Penetrating stab wounds to the abdomen: use of serial US and
contrast-enhanced CT in stable patients. Radiology 2001;220:365371.
15. Schnriger B, Inaba K, Barmparas G, Eberle BM, Lustenberger T,
Lam L, et al. Serial white blood cell counts in trauma: do they predict
a hollow viscous injury? J Trauma 2010;69:302-307.
16. Abramson N, Melton B. Leukocytosis: basics of clinical assessment.
Am Fam Physician 2000;62:2053-2060.
17. Santucci CA, Purcell TB, Mejia C. Leukocytosis as a predictor of
severe injury in blunt trauma. West J Emerg Med 2008;9:81-85.
18. McCarthy DA, Grant M, Marbut M, Watling M, Wade AJ,
Macdonald I, et al. Brief exercise induces an immediate and delayed
leukocytosis. Br Sp Med 1991;25:191-195.
19. Cander B, Tosun M, Kalkan E. Morphologic and quantitative
analyses of leukocytes in patients with multiple system trauma. Adv
Ther 2007;24:119-122.
20. Casali M, Di Saverio S, Tugnoli G, Biscardi A, Villani S, Cancellieri
F, et al. Penetrating abdominal trauma: 20 years experience in a
Western European Trauma Center. Ann Ital Chir 2008;79:399-407.
21. Ertekin C, Yanar H, Taviloglu K, Gloglu R, Alimoglu O.
Unnecessary laparotomy by using physical examination and different
diagnostic modalities for penetrating abdominal stab wounds. Emerg
Med J 2005;22:790-794.
22. Chang DC, Cornwell EE 3rd, Phillips J, Paradise J, Campbell K.
Early leukocytosis in trauma patients: what difference does it make?
Curr Surg 2003;60:632-635.