Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Change Record
Date
Author
Versi
on
25-Aug2010
09-Dec2010
24-Dec2010
Gill Preston
0.1
Initial draft
Katherine
Charman
Katherine
Charman
0.2
1.0
Change Reference
Contents
1.
2.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................................1
PROJECT OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................................................................3
a)
Business need......................................................................................................................................................3
b)...........................................................................................................................................................................................5
c) Benefits.......................................................................................................................................................................5
3. SCOPE................................................................................................................................................................................6
a)
In scope..................................................................................................................................................................6
b)
Out of scope..........................................................................................................................................................6
4. OBJECTIVES & CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS..................................................................................................................8
a)
Objectives..............................................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
5. PLAN...................................................................................................................................................................................9
a)
Approach................................................................................................................................................................9
b)
Project phases......................................................................................................................................................9
6. RISK MANAGEMENT.........................................................................................................................................................14
a)
Risks.......................................................................................................................................................................14
b)
Issues.....................................................................................................................................................................14
c) Assumptions............................................................................................................................................................14
d)
That Dependencies..........................................................................................................................................15
e) Constraints..............................................................................................................................................................15
7. PROJECT RESOURCES......................................................................................................................................................16
a)
Financial...............................................................................................................................................................16
b)
Human...................................................................................................................................................................16
8. MANAGING THE PROJECT................................................................................................................................................18
a)
Change Control..................................................................................................................................................18
b)
Project logs..........................................................................................................................................................18
c) Communications....................................................................................................................................................18
9. PROJECT CLOSURE..........................................................................................................................................................19
a)
Procedure.............................................................................................................................................................19
b)
Acceptance into Operational Service (AiOS)..........................................................................................19
1. Executive Summary
In order to attract good quality applicants to its postgraduate programmes from
the UK, EU and internationally, the University of Exeter must make sure that
conditions exist which optimise the chances of enquiries being converted into
high quality applications, and then into acceptances and enrolments.
A students first contact with and ongoing experience of communicating with the
University is critical in creating a good impression. Prospective students need
high quality information, delivered at the right time and in the most effective and
easy to understand way.
It is essential that the decision making process and supporting systems are as
efficient and effective as possible, with information about the status of
applications being easily available to both staff and applicants, especially given
that the numbers of enquiries and applications received by the University
continues to increase year on year.
The review of communications to pre-applicants and applicants for Postgraduate
Taught (PGT) courses that was carried out in 2009 identified a number of
shortcomings in existing communications and concluded that a Customer
Relationship Management (CRM) system would assist in resolving these.
A successful bid for funding from the Governments modernisation fund led to
purchase of the Hobsons product (EMT Connect) and online application system
EMT Apply Yourself in September 2010. The project to implement these
products and related improvements to business processes and communication
standards has now been formally initiated following appointment of a Project
Manager.
The project has the following business objectives:
To improve the enquiry and application experience for those applying to the
University for postgraduate places and thus improve the conversion rates for
good quality applicants from enquiry to application.
To improve the communications that postgraduate pre-applicants and
applicants receive from the University, making them more consistent and
appropriate to the audience.
To increase the transparency and efficiency of the administrative process that
supports postgraduate enquiry and application.
To enhance marketing tools and reporting to enable better targeting and
evaluation of marketing activity, contributing to more effective marketing
spend
To introduce a benefits measurement approach that will support continuous
improvement in ways of working.
During Project Initiation the Admissions team requested that the scope for
implementation of the system should be extended to cover postgraduate
research applicants up to the point of enrolment. The Marketing department
asked that the scope for implementation of the Apply Yourself online application
form be extended to replace the current online funding application form. These
have been logged as project change requests and the viability of including these
additional areas without detriment to project timescales will be assessed during
detailed implementation planning so that a decision can be made on the way
forward during January 2011.
Successful delivery of this project will depend upon resource being available
across the University, in particular from teams in Admissions and Marketing, to
define the business rules and develop the content necessary for effective
implementation of the Hobsons tools. Resource will also need to be available
from Academic Systems in order to design and develop the interfaces that will be
needed with the student records system, SITS.
2. Project Overview
The University of Exeter aims to boost postgraduate and international
recruitment as part of its strategy to maintain its position as a top 10 institution.
In order to do so it must not only attract higher numbers of good quality
applicants to its postgraduate programmes but must also make sure the
conditions exist which optimise the chances of enquiries being converted into
applications, acceptances and enrolments.
The way in which the University communicates with prospective students from
the initial contact to enrolment is crucial. Prospective students need good
quality information, delivered at the right time and in the most effective and
easy to understand way. A students first contact and on-going experience of
communicating with the University is critical in creating a good impression which
affects their readiness to apply for and accept a place.
In 2009, a review of the communications to pre-applicants and applicants for
Postgraduate Taught (PGT) courses was undertaken by the Projects Office
(referred to as the PGT communications review in this document). It identified
a number of shortcomings, and concluded that some of these required the
implementation of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system to
resolve them.
In 2010, the University successfully bid for funding from the Governments
Modernisation Fund. The fund provided for initiatives to improve efficiencies
within Universities to enable them to increase administrative capacity in order to
handle higher student numbers. Some of the funds allocated to Exeter were
offered for a project to implement an enquiries and application management
system to address the issues outlined in the Postgraduate Taught Customer
Relationship Management Review.
In Autumn 2010 the University purchased Hobsons product EMT Connect and
Hobsons online application system EMT ApplyYourself. This document defines
the project to implement this software and the related improvements to business
processes and communication standards.
a) Business need
The PGT enquiry and application process is a large and complex operation:
Managing this process is a considerable overhead for the University. The way
that it is managed can have significant impact on the quality and quantity of
postgraduate applicants that successfully convert. The PGT communications
review identified a number of areas for improvement within the PGT enquiry and
application process.
The issues identified included:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
b) Benefits
As part of the conditions of the Modernisation Fund, this project must deliver
efficiency savings. A full benefits realisation plan will be developed and this
will include specific targets for efficiency savings, but at this stage it is
anticipated that savings will be made in the following areas:
Removal of duplication of effort by administrative staff within the preapplication to enrolment processes through the creation of one common
enquiry and applications process across the University with agreed roles
and responsibilities.
In addition the project will enhance the post graduate pre-applicant and
applicant experience by making the process more responsive to their needs,
more transparent and more efficient. The objectives in doing this will be to
increase the conversion rate from enquiry to application, to boost the
Universitys reputation as a University of postgraduate choice, to enhance its
ability to attract the best postgraduates and to deliver PGT target numbers.
3. Scope
a) In scope
Replacement of the current online application system for PGT and PGR
applications
Implementation of Hobsons EMT Connect for postgraduate research preapplicants and applicants and their agents from enquiry to point of
submission of application via the new online form
Data flows between Hobsons Apply Yourself and Connect and SITS, and
any related links necessary to the accommodation system PAMS and
the prospectus fulfillment system, Handle with Care.
b Out of scope
A new online application system for PGT students and PGR students
provided through Hobsons Apply Yourself.
The Admissions team have requested that the scope for implementation
of the Hobsons EMT Connect software be extended to cover PGR
students up to the point of registration as there is a feeling that
different scope for PGT & PGR students could be confusing for the team.
This could include replacement of the PGR Applicant Management
system that has recently been developed and is being used in the
postgraduate school of Education. As post application processes for
PGR students vary across the Colleges, extending the scope for the
initial implementation of the system may introduce a significant level of
additional complexity which could present a risk to achievability of the
project within required timescales the extension of scope and possible
risk to timescales will be fully assessed during the next stages of the
project.
ii)
There has been a request that the scope for implementation of the
Apply Yourself online application form be extended to replace the
current online funding application form. Early discussions with Hobsons
suggest that this is likely to be complex to implement, as the Hobsons
Apply Yourself product is based on submission of a single application
per student. Replacing the funding application using ApplyYourself
would effectively require additional development of the software (which
may or may not be possible) in order that two subsequent applications
could be received from a student, the first for funding and the second
for a place.
Inclusion of the work to deliver these two additional areas of functionality will
be considered in the light of analysis of implications for resource requirements
and project timescales, based on further information from Hobsons and other
Universities during the project planning stage. A final decision on scope will be
made in consultation with the Project Team and Project Board in early 2011.
4. Objectives
The project has the following objectives:
5. Plan
a) Approach
Hobsons Connect and Apply Yourself software was purchased in September
2010. The scope of the plan laid out in this section includes all the phases
from initiation of the formal project following the appointment of a project
manager through to implementation of the software for PGT students up to the
point of registration and PGR students up to the point of application.
This PID is being written during the first half of the project planning and
initiation phase, before Hobsons have provided a suggested implementation
timeline in response to the Universitys requirements. The plan described in
this section is a draft outline plan, based on the Universitys aspirations and
requirements as expressed at this stage of the project. The final project plan
will be developed once further information has been received from Hobsons
and will be agreed by the Project Board and Project Team in January 2011.
There is a risk that the project will not succeed if overly ambitious targets are
set for changes to be implemented by September 2011. This risk can be
mitigated by ensuring that the project implementation plan is realistic, based
on the resources available, and reflects the need for a phased approach to be
taken to implementation if necessary.
b) Project phases
The project will be divided into 8 phases (some of which will overlap rather
than running sequentially).
The overall timelines for the project are shown on the next page.
Each phase within the project is described in more detail on the following
pages.
10
11
Phase 1
Scope:
Dates/Duration:
15th November 2010 14th January 2011 (7 weeks plus 1 week holiday
closure)
Deliverables:
Approved PID
Project logs
Provided by:
Phase 2
Scope:
i)
ii)
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
23rd November 2010 28th January 2011 (8 weeks plus 1 week holiday
closure)
As is process map
Phased traini
Discovery Phase
12
Provided by:
Phase 3
PHASE TITLE:
Scope:
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Provided by:
2010
2011
CRM
13
Phase 4
PHASE TITLE:
AND BUILD
Scope:
Design, development and testing of EMT Connect for enquirers for PGT
and PGR courses.
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Jul
Provided by:
Phase 3
PHASE TITLE:
AND BUILD
Scope:
Design, development and testing of EMT Connect for applicants for PGT
and PGR courses.
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Jun
Provided by:
Phase 6
PHASE TITLE:
Scope:
Final training of expert users and end users, launch of new May
application
forms and Hobsons EMT Connect system, implementation handover
report.
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Provided by:
Au
Feb
14
Jan
Phase 7
PHASE TITLE:
PROJECT CLOSURE
Scope:
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Provided by:
Phase 8
Scope:
Dec
Nov
Dates/Duration:
Deliverables:
Benefit measures
Provided by:
15
6. Risk Management
This is a large and complex project with a wide range of stakeholders across the University
and very ambitious timescales for work to be delivered before October 2011.
Risks and issues which arise during the project will be logged and managed by the Project
Manager.
b Risks
The following key risks have been identified during project initiation:
The project can only succeed if sufficient expertise is provided from the BISS teams to
advise on the requirements for interfaces to SITS and other supporting business systems
and to design and build the interfaces required. There is a risk that it will not be
possible to deliver the project to required timescales if the necessary resource is not
available. This risk will be mitigated by detailed resource estimating as the project
progresses, with any identified issues being escalated to the Project Board together with
recommendations for resolving them.
Delivering the project to required deadlines for the next application cycle will require
substantial resource from Marketing (to design communications plans, communication
pieces and the content of applicant and enquirer VIP pages) and Admissions (to design
business processes and business rules). There is a risk that it will not be possible to
deliver the project to required timescales if the necessary resource is not available. This
risk will be mitigated by detailed resource estimating as the project progresses, with any
identified issues being escalated to the Project Board together with recommendations
for resolving them.
There is a risk that the project will not succeed if overly ambitious targets are set for
changes to be implemented by September 2011. This risk can be mitigated by ensuring
that the project implementation plan is realistic, based on the resources available, and
reflects the need for a phased approach to be taken to implementation if necessary.
There is a risk that it will not be possible to create a single, unified University process for
managing enquiries and applications.
A complete log of all Project Risks identified during Project Initiation is kept with the Project
Filing and will be reviewed with the Project Board on a regular basis.
b Issues
No issues are affecting the project currently.
c) Assumptions
The following assumptions have been made in developing this Project Initiation document
and the project plan that it includes:
The members of the Project Team and the Project Board will be able to commit the time
required for successful completion of the project.
The Admissions team will make available resource with the appropriate knowledge, time
and authority to design the business rules and processes required for successful
implementation of the system.
The Marketing team will make available resource to design the communications plans
and communication pieces and develop the content of applicant and enquirer VIP pages.
The Academic Systems development team will make available technical support and
advice to the project and the resource for development of interfaces to systems
including SITS.
16
The scope questions raised during project initiation can be satisfactorily resolved in
order that the final plan for work to be delivered can be agreed in January 2011.
The Hobsons implementation team are able to provide the resource required to ensure
that the project can be delivered to required timescales
Changes to the enquiries process can be implemented at any point during the academic
year, but changes to the applications process must be implemented in October 2011,
after the 2011/12 intake of students and before applications for the 2012/13 intake start
to be received.
d) Dependencies
The system implementation will involve interfacing with SITS. SITS is an operational
system which is continually undergoing development. There is a need to ensure that the
development is prioritized appropriately to enable it to completed within project
timescales.
e) Constraints
The new applications forms and Hobsons Connect for applicants need to be in place by
October 2011 in order to manage applications for the 2012-13 in take.
For the Admissions team, August and September are particularly busy months and it will
not be possible for them to be involved in systems development, testing or training
during those months.
All areas of the University are busy during Welcome Week (last week in September) and
no testing or training can be planned to take place during that week or the week leading
up to it.
17
7. Project Resources
b Financial
The budget for this project is as shown below:
Ite
m
Y/E 31 July
2011
k
Income
Modernisation Fund
TESS
Academic Services IT Maintenance
Expenditure
Software licences, installation and
hosting
VAT at 17.5%
Additional development work by Web
Team?
Sundry expenses (meetings, visits etc)
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
2012
k
2013
k
80.00
39.85
102.00
17.85
119.8
5
Cumulative
Total
k
9.99
9.99
80.00
39.85
19.98
8.50
1.49
8.50
1.49
119.00
20.80
9.99
9.99
139.8
0
Financial assumptions:
The initial contract price for 2011-13 has been agreed at a VAT rate of 17.5%
Legal advice was provided in house and so there were no legal charges
All incidental costs will be absorbed within Academic Services Student Services budget.
E.g. travel to reference sites, refreshments for working groups and other meetings.
Project management cost has been covered by the Modernisation Fund, Sharepoint
project.
Technical support will be provided by the BIS team at no cost to the project.
If Web Team resource is required this will be provided at no cost to the project.
f) Human
i. Project Board
It expected that there will be a maximum of six Project Board meetings over the life
of the project including the final post implementation review meeting. The time
commitment is estimated at half a day per meeting, allowing for review of papers.
Position
Chair
International Office
Post graduate Studies
Colleges
Name
Simon Wright
Robin Rhodes
Dr Jonathan
Barry
Roz Pardee
Marketing
Stuart Franklin
Admissions
Project Manager
Ian Blenkharn
Katherine
Charman
Service/College
Head of Student Services
International Officer
Dean of Taught Programmes
Assistant College Manager, College of
Humanities
Director of Communication &
Marketing
Head of Admissions
Senior Project Manager
18
Act as the point of contact between the Project and their Service or College and
disseminate information on project plans and progress as appropriate.
Project Manager
Name
Katherine
Charman
Days
require
d or %
of time
Durati
on
(wks)
Commit
ment
agreed?
80%
50
19
Admissions
Sally Rutterford
International
Office
Robin Rhodes
Marketing
Post Graduate
Guild
Student Finance
Colleges
Business
School
CEMPS
Humanities
Life and
environment
al sciences
SSIS
Tremough
BISS SITS
expert
Nicola Sinclair
Gary McLachlan
Tracy Banks
Helen Freeman &
Jane Knox
Liz Roberts
Morwenna
Hussey &,
Gemma Wiggins
Fiona Neligan
Emma Reeve
Jo Thacker
Ian Lee / Bernice
James
Helen Whyte
Rob Mitchell
10%
50
5%
40
10%
5%
5%
50
40
40
5%
40
5%
40
5%
5%
40
40
5%
5%
40
40
40
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
40
40
Y
Y
25%
5%
5%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Accommodation
Web Team
20
a) Change Control
The standard University change controls will be exercised, with change requests presented
to the Project Board for consideration and decision. Given the time constraint and the
danger of scope creep, care will be taken to minimize the number of change requests that
are accepted.
All change requests that are presented to the Board will be published on the project
website.
b) Project logs
Project logs containing risks, issues and actions have been created and will be maintained
throughout the project the emphasis will be on ensuring that none of the risks that are
recognized become issues that need to be overcome. The latest copy will be held on the
project website.
c) Communications
Given the wide impact of the project, it is imperative that active communications are
maintained both during and after the implementation.
i. Stakeholder Analysis
A stakeholder analysis will be created which will inform the communications plan and
actions. A copy will be held on the project website.
ii. Communications Plan
A communications plan will be developed and actioned throughout the
implementation and beyond. A copy will be held on the project website.
21
9. Project Closure
The project will be closed when all phases of the project have been delivered.
a) Procedure
At the end of the project the Project Manager will survey stakeholders to determine their
views on the way the project was conducted and use the results to inform the lessons
learned section in the Project Closure report. The Closure report will be presented to the
Project Board together with the request to close the project.
22