You are on page 1of 1

38850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices

exporting items in violation of an order DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE disclosure of which would be likely to
prohibiting Respondent from exporting items frustrate significantly implementation of
subject to the Regulations. Respondent Bureau of Industry and Security an agency action as described in 5
engaged in a conspiracy to export items to U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt
Syria without the required Department of Information Systems Technical from the provisions relating to public
Commerce authorization. The United States Advisory Committee; Notice of meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2
maintains controls over exports to Syria Partially Closed Meeting
because Syria is a state sponsor of terrorism.
sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The
In addition, Respondent has shown contempt The Information Systems Technical remaining portions of the meeting will
for the administrative orders issued by BIS by Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will meet be open to the public.
exporting items in violation of an order on July 26 and 27, 2006, 9 a.m., in the For more information, call Yvette
denying his export privileges and by Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, Springer at (202) 482–4814.
changing names on shipping documents to 14th Street between Constitution and Dated: July 5, 2006.
evade the order denying his export Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Yvette Springer,
privileges. Washington, DC. The Committee
Such a penalty is consistent with penalties Committee Liaison Officer.
advises the Office of the Assistant [FR Doc. 06–6100 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am]
imposed in a recent case under the
Secretary for Export Administration on
Regulations involving shipments to BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
technical questions that affect the level
comprehensively sanctioned countries. See
In the Matter of Petrom GmbH International of export controls applicable to
Trade, 70 FR 32,743 (June 6, 2005) (affirming information systems equipment and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
the recommendations of the Administrative technology.
Law Judge that a twenty year denial and July 26 Bureau of Industry and Security
$143,000 administrative penalty was
appropriate where violations involved Public Session Sensors and Instrumentation
multiple shipments of EAR99 items to Iran as 1. Opening Remarks and Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
a part of a conspiracy to ship such items of Partially Closed Meeting
Introductions.
through Germany to Iran).
2. Current Issues of Interest to ISTAC, The Sensors and Instrumentation
The recommended penalties are also
consistent with settlements reached in
Including Licensing Trends. Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC)
3. Export Enforcement. will meet on July 25, 2006, 9:30 a.m., in
significant BIS cases under the Regulations
4. FPGA Computer Architecture.
concerning illegal exports of pipe coating
5. Fab Perspective on Cluster Tools. the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room
materials to Libya. See In the Matter of Jerry 3884, 14th Street between Constitution
6. Synthetic Instruments.
Vernon Ford, 67 FR 7352 (February 19, 2002) and Pennsylvania Avenues, NW.,
7. Introduction of New WA Proposals.
(settlement agreement for a 25 year denial); Washington, DC. The Committee
8. Practitioner’s Guide to APP.
In the Matter of Preston John Engebretson, 67 advises the Office of the Assistant
FR 7354 (February 19, 2002) (settlement July 27 Secretary for Export Administration on
agreement for a 25 year denial); and In the
Closed Session technical questions that affect the level
Matter of Thane-Coat, Inc., 67 FR 7351
(February 19, 2002) (settlement agreement for
of export controls applicable to sensors
9. Discussion of matters determined to and instrumentation equipment and
a civil penalty of $1,120,000 ($520,000 be exempt from the provisions relating
suspended for two years and a 25 year technology.
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
denial)). app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). Agenda
The nature and quantity of violations in A limited number of seats will be
this case warrant a more significant penalty. Public Session
available for the public session.
In particular, Respondent’s contempt for the
Reservations are not accepted. To the 1. Welcome and Introductions.
temporary denial order by continuing to
export after the order was imposed and extent time permits, members of the 2. Remarks from the Bureau of
constantly shifting both his name and public may present oral statement to the Industry and Security Management.
Tetrabal’s name to evade the order warrants Committee. The public may submit 3. Industry Presentations.
the extraordinary penalty proposed in order written statements at any time before or 4. New Business.
to prevent others from showing the same after the meeting. However, to facilitate
Closed Session
contempt for BIS’s administrative orders. In distribution of public presentation
addition, there are no factors that have been materials to Committee members, the 5. Discussion of matters determined to
put forth by Respondent that warrant any Committee suggests that public be exempt from the provisions relating
mitigation of the penalty. presentation materials or comments be to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
VIII. Recommended Order forwarded before the meeting to Ms. app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
Yvette Springer at A limited number of seats will be
[Redacted Section]
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. available during the public session of
Within 30 days after receipt of this The Assistant Secretary for the meeting. Reservations are not
Recommended Decision and Order, the Administration, with the concurrence of accepted. To the extent that time
Under Secretary shall issue a written order, the delegate of the General Counsel, permits, members of the public may
affirming, modifying or vacating the
formally determined on June 27, 2006, present oral statements to the
recommended decision and order. See 15
CFR § 766.22(c).
pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Committee. The public may submit
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 written statements at any time before or
Done and dated June 5, 2006 at Norfolk,
U.S.C. app. 2 section (10)(d)), that the after the meeting. However, to facilitate
Virginia.
portion of the meeting concerning trade distribution of public presentation
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Peter A. Fitzpatrick, secrets and commercial or financial materials to the Committee members,
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard,
information deemed privileged or the Committee suggests that the
Norfolk, Virginia.
confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. materials be forwarded before the
[FR Doc. 06–6022 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] 552b(c)(4) and the portion of the meeting to Ms. Yvette Springer at
BILLING CODE 3510–33–M meeting concerning matters the Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1

You might also like