Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IW
I
~
~
I
ii
ifl
II
AND
THE MATHAS
A. NATA::JA AIYER
AND
I*
If
I8
I
I
I
by
A. Nataraja Aiyer
and
S. Lakshminarasimha Sastri,M.A.,
L.T.
POBLISHERS
First Published
1962
Reprinted
1988
Revised Edition
1992
Price Rs.
other
who
through practice and
::: precept, have fostered the .. ..
.... h o a r y A d v a i i i c.
tradition thatwas bequeathed ....
to
posterity
by
Preface
~
CONTENTS
1J1.i11
li
l 111!11,
I.
II.
III.
PAGE
CHAPTER
I V.
V.
Prelude
The Bb.agavatpada
...,
and the Mathas
Sri Sankaracharya
46
5&
73
The Mathamnaya
Pitha
VI.
113
VII.
Epilogue
141
APPENDIX A
147
155
161
an
PAGB
APPENDIX
, ~~I~ if;J: f
~"'~~+.11) ii~
illlt ~ ifr~~l"i
166
THE
169
172
Prelude
~il~<wfffir1;ITTiff~~:
177
?Trfi
APPENDIX
'
APPENDIX
181
The
Vidyaghana - Abhinava
Tangle
~'lir.( Wi?\~laT~~Ri"t. t
APPENDIX
Sankara
187
ruao
190
ul1'
0111 m1ds1
111
;i,,
uf' l\nli
j;
I ( ),
II
.-\n expert i11 the four V('CTas in his eighth }Tai. a pro
foimd scholar and a master of all Sastras in his twelftl1
yea.r, lt< indited in his sixteenth year those incomparabfo
P.: 1a.syas on i hr Brahma Sutrns, on the Upanislwds an<l
on the Bi:aga.vafl Git.a, an intimate knowlrdge of whmw
1ll'pths it were impossi.hle to attain rven -with a full span
of a hundre<l years <ledicated to their stndy. Hr.
.-:wept like a tomado throughout the length an<l hreadth
of Inrfo1 rnorP than thrice, nprouting man~ k~ p-rootcd
h1'resi1:;, ee:>tori.ng thr Vedir religion to its pristine
purity ; and propagating thc m<'1>sag<' of Adv:.iit:i through
the Mathas whi.rh hr fonn<kd among- the snow-rlarl sum-
rim11lnyas,
111
We propose,
date of Sankara
and to trace the
pa.rticuforly, the
which the great
Aeharya.
6
I,
'i11,1dl ,1
f ,,
t1
lw <'or11111arnls II ti
th
.
a
ilC 0
erg tQ follow
"J'lw11~h
.
lllN1.nwl 1011s
i111d
the lead
we are not t 0 ld ha
w t exactly the n1>rti
were we e~n ve...v
ll
.
''
ng
un els t h e ,Jyotll'
reacllu;
t etl ast coast, :founds the Go>ardhana Matha then turns
sou l-west found Sri
'
13
d
'
s
ngen, finally arrives at Kanehi
h~u~fs the_ K1Uuakoti Pitha, stays there till the end
" e, nnd attains Videha Mukti Tt . . ld th
th t tl fi
\\Ou
us appear
ar a
le nal b hE> t of Oovinda Bhagavatpada was tl t
w.athd<.; honl<l b f
d ;J ,
<
1a
..
e onn eu m v:uious parts of the co'l'll)try
(Hde--Tlie Ag~ of S11.nltii111 h.- 'I' ~ 11-T"ra,an" o-~.
pp. 99-1631.
.
. .. '~" n qmJLl'I,
'
' ""J
Ma
of
CHAPTF.R
THE BHAGAVATPADA
A mono Hi<' moist 1'm rt.an
. "
PO
t acluevements of Sri Sa.nk.:1.
ac1iarya, reverent_ia]Jy caJled the Bl:
..11
:restahlishment oi M th
.
.
. . rngavatp""'1.a, the
.
, 'fi a as m var10ns parts of Ind. 1a 1- ;i~
,
certamly .
a SJgm cant one, Althouo-h 'manv of th
r
b
~ ese
M athas ha
ve c isapprared due to political and . . - .
eausrs . d ih
ooonom.rc
, , -' ctn
, ough some of them a1.n.' i'n t.he- pr,~ss o:f
l. He reor.ganistld- the a1>eet1~ d
- -
motlel of tho 'Buddhist order and cf. or er of Hincl11::' '" <ni lt"
in dlrerent ,Jllllrte of India.' the ounded a numb\'' of M:Lt,has
S.rlngerI, Dwn1aka Badarlnath
best knnwn being 1ho""' <it
x'
ilakanta
or
,.
l.
------
A~ft:~~J~R?!~~fu-ri~1a:
II
w: {f+Tf.rrm: 1
10
II
11 . It to It
trr1111ItI1011 )
/
U"'
It U
' 'j
flt C'
I
( ;jf,c Of
S_..L.~-s
"'"' '"
D.
~iv. r'fl{ fir.Jr~~ si 1~Jffi
"' ' 6-.
{l
nt1 ..
.. s
The clrronogimn
'"'~\1\? I
3889
Ka!i or 3889-3102=
, i.e., 3889
777-78 A.D.
SuniJa.rJ~ anothe ,._
J h reads ~ ~ .
4'...-' h' es ther cwonogra1n
wuc
~ Lu.L'IJJ
d t
~
-IA ~lifii'f~819-~0 A. D.
a e of Sankara's <lea th to beLUC
In fact, not only is there this reference to ,Jnanasambhanda, but there are references to Sundam.murti
1.1nd Siru Tondar in the Sivabhujanga Stotra and to
Kannappa Nayanar in the Sivananda I1ahari. The SivnbJrnjanga Stotra contains the verse : -
:rr:;Fb-...
~~~~~~ ~~ ~~: I
~!Jfg=
'883 which
d,
y
f .. L
' i evel'Se
yields
~rs. o
b 1
lfi~ifq ~r;:or~ait~urr
ilr
fq-q:~l~orr ill 11
(Sivabhujanga 13)
];l'i;;rrsfu
Cle.
Sundarmnurt.i and Sirn T<mdar7 were a.t le;1st histori cal, and W t'l'C known to ha ve lived in the 7th and 8th
centuries ie:-;pceti ,.Pl)' . B11t Chandcsa and Kamrnpila an~
q1rn.si-leg<noh1ry figures whos<> li-H~s . could not have been
so well-known hllt for t lwi 1 hnving been immortalisc<l in
the Perin Pnl'annm h.v S ckkiihar. It would 1'hrrcf01P. he
l!\Orn 11:<1s01111 hie to believe that the Sankara who wTok
the Si vaJ,huj:mga arnl Sivanauda Lah a 1i, l i n'd r1,f tr!r
Sekkir.har in tlw 12th century A. D. 1-km(', rcli:rnce on
these presumptim1s would fav<m1 a date late1 than the
12th e<>ntury, rather than th(' early 9th centnry if we
admit that. thc> Adi Sa nlrnra was the author of these
i.
tury A.D.
7th c~n
13
12
sUlli,as;. 'l'his is palpahly uhstud. TbNi{' stotras can
be r,ttributed to 8ank~ua, ru1<l 11enc.e thejr value
a. internal v idencc fol' dcterm.iuing Llte clat( of Sankara
~ve1
is tt !Jsolutel. Nil ;
.A!i!aD$?'n
of tut\, doc1l'ines.
or J)inu aga
or Nagarjum1 brand
Wt>
Bal live el;Ll"lier than the 3rd or the 4th century A.D. ? :Ve
will later on re-fer t o a date :for Na..,,aarjuna, m uch earlw1
than what ; now accepted.
rui
14
15
~arlier.
1
I"
m11
~ 'f.q'l.f: ~~o;qq_ I
Susama 16
16
.
uid d by
u11ti d"IV 1111011
' 17
it oots about
. .
.L
i
<leseribm~
" we tme o Sankara.. bU'th ~
~mu ~a't ~it: ~~Slil~f;~
wh~n.
~~ ~ ~firwr ~ ~~r
:q'
~it u
.
(.Matll1a1 iya. Sankara Vijaya 72J
" Arya.mba gav1' birth
. .
whe th S.
Io a. sou rn an arn;pieious Lagn<i
. n
lUl, Mut-s aml Saturn were in exal .
tion and .Jtl])ite1 in Ktndra."
ta-
'
"'
hirtl1 accord.in
gl\ e the yea t o t' Sankal'a''>
1
.
g o any on . of the Indi"'
mdee<l., has he sa1d
ll .
t b e V11ra o1 Lagua It
' lC
i,
of Ra.ma' Jataka . . :;et~1s to be a mndom imitation
as g1 en m VnLniki's Ramaya I ta.
-- -
Sun
Budha
Sukra
Chandra
Rahu
Lagna
Ii'
Guru
- --
I
Kali 2593
Constellation
Ardhra
l
J
i
Kuja
Ke tu
I
I
Sani
of Sankara
18
'
C:l 6iJ'f: 1
This argument
reasons:-
erumot
carry
co11Yfotjon
for two
(a J 'there is no pu~posefiil allusion here to Pataliputra. Tl1e context may vel'J well lrnve b(en fillC'<l up
with namrs at any other city, like Dwaraka, Ayoclhya
or :ivanti. T.he _i\charya ml'rC'l,l- want d to m ntion two
~ities, Yory far apart. Ile just chancrcl on tl1(? names of
~wo such cities, one being Pataliputra. There is, as mueh
.; ~ ~!!il' {TGTT ~
Slt'li'!!if<Plolts~<I:. '({4~~~
JJ~~r'l ~r cpc<n~'1l u~r ~ ll<r~fu <11 fq~lf;:i 1
(U : lt 18).
1- ...
and a non-existent.. To illusassoe1ation
ue~ween an ex1' stent
.
tnttb the point, the Bhagavatpada dra.ws attent10n tothe
, ahstndity of a statement such as "Purn~va11mm succeed
.ed a barren woman's son." The tnntlon of a barren
\';<;man's son as having been the predecesso1 of .Purnavarmnn could never prove that the barren womall's son ever
.c~isted, or exists or could exist.
N'ow, here again, historians have detected an allusion
to Purnavarman, who, presumably, must have been a
. .Contemporary of Sankara. The case is argued thlllt
Among the kings with the surnamo Varman, of the van..
"'e
come ac>ross two Purnavarmans.
.ous d ynast ies
"
"l'h-~ro is a. Purnn.va.rman mentioned il" a. Ja'l[a copper
plate inscription. This Purnava.rman c~u1~ no~ hr.ve
had anything to do with Sankara, since. he hve-a m. iaroff Jav:':t. Another Purnavarman is mentioned by H1eung
"l'sang as having ruled over Western Ma~adha. And
:Sirice Sankara wrote 'his Bhasyas in Varanasi (Benares),
=-:-
20
he could not have been unaware of PurnavarmMl_ of
MagacTha., who probably eaine to the throne during the
Achary.i.'il ojourn a.t Knsi. Hence, it is reasonable to
suppose Lha.t S<mkara wrote hls Bhasya after Puma.v.arman 's aMes.sion to the thron~, since the Sutra Bbasya
speaks of Pama varrnan's coronation (<i.uT<l'licrr)sf~if;R(
etc.). PruLably, Sankara expounded the Bl1asya dming_
Purnavarman's r0ign. Himce, Sankara and Purna.va.riruUr
were rontemporaries.
Fmthel' confirmation of Purnavarman's date is forthcoming. 1'h sacred Bo-Tree at Buddha Gaya was cuL
down by one Sasanka, but it was aga-in nurtured into
growth hy Pumavarman who was a Buddhist. This
Sasan:ka, again, j identified witlt that Sasattlm who
treacherously killed Rajyava.r dhana, the elder brother of
Harsanndhana. Siladitya. Dr. Ferguson fixes the date
of Rajyavardhana and his father Prabhakar.a rardha.rui
respectively at 610 .A.D. and 580 A.TI. Prof. Max
1\follcr assigns Prabhakara,vardhana and Rajyayardhana,
to 6no fl.I'd tilO A.D., respectively. Ilenee Sasanka must
Jiavq lven living about 605 .A. D. Rene , Pumavarman
who nmtmcd back the Bo-Tree at Buddha Gaya after"
its <lest ruction by Sa.sank.a, must have lived early in
the 7tli ~ntU1'y. Hence, Sankara too must have liVt!d iIJ
the f'.A-riiei part of the 7th century-.
21
Tl1c foregoing argument is indeed yerv ingenious, But,
. tl1e. follov;irn.,_ lloints
'hefore any cr<'dcncc is given to it,
.must be considered :-V eda nta
.
r.a) '\'as 8anlrnra r>:poun d mg
<B.
)l or
. , was
, ? he
\
I
.
't
.
the
Sutra
i,1sy.t
.
W:t'iting contemporary ns ory m
.
J
. mentlOlle
. d in thP contc:<', merely
.
( ('\/ l'H t"Javmnrnn is
J
'
.
f tl
top;c unc1e1 i]1scnsto illustrate the irn~l1cations o . lC tl . . , J{shatr'':1 name
In~tcad of his name, nny o ie1
, ' . .t '
h
RlOil.
.
. A<lit avarrnan ' rn igh ;
ave
~nd1 ns _,\.vant1varman or
y
h
' Jl . 1 18)
. l ~ fact in the Slttra B asya ~ . . . .
l)('C'n usec . Jn .
'
fr1rc1l 1 <' D vawhel'(~ Sruglma and l) ata11pn tra< ar t'i d 1s ,, having
,
v
.
1 tfa 1oo a re men .ton
,.
daLl :1. an(, ' aJIWc a . "
. .. ,
_.,__w:b1'le 1rvinn to
r
Js it wot'"''
, !;,
1csidcd. in those ci ,ies.
, tt
n<l y. jnadatta, fix
.
, 1 t"irs of Devacrn .. a n .
,1,
-<.'StnlJl 1sh 1 ne 1C en. IL '
l
, l t, _, n,, 8ankan1.
fi San "'U'a s c d t' " 111,,_,
tk~i l' dat.C'S, a lltl thl'llCC ix_~' " (I ,Yiijna<laita S .r1mLentsJH)llJ<l have hecn Dnvadatt<l s a;1
t"D now th1i11~ht of
po1n 1y 1 1"orhmat l.v, 1~0 on{' .ms,_',
"""'"TT11"" . (the
.
h
'd tifV
Ol t11il~
..,.. ...,,~.,,
cfo;1wc1mg t {' l enh
p ...... varnw.n is said t h~ve
iuu ...
ll S son) w om
Lw11cn womn
.
.
l l t be if some one
llHked won l J
sntir<~(lr. <'. l jT.n,vemous
"'
~ 's son'' th,,"'
. '
(the harrcn won1 " 11
:nn .'le
t1iat
<i~l.Tf'.Ji.3f
.eont1t1TJ01;ny of Sankara!
. 1'n e con 1.ex t , has as mLu:l1 spec1fo~
" . 'lll rn
.
I.., 1l111avctln1,
,.
.
I ". Ail th('se in;cmons
1
't
Torn Thck or I ari;,;.
.
..J
j, Ni\ i y :E:
. '
in1l1'P11 1111wh :luO
,.
i1.1 ,.,.c1
on tr1.'Jlucs, l"'l'l'C
,,
'-;jWCll 1rtLlOllS,
m..
1 f"JS<'
:n ho11t not 111-11g---,
' .. of la liom lost.
.
. J)O..sitive evidence
to.,
the eoni rarv thcl'C JS
.
( c) On
J ,
)~'
11,'gadha at. the 1.nne ox
ono
'-' '
.;;: hrnr t l U:Lt 11ir
,., <i. ' ~
(Gurnratnamah'ka
, s Hal a aifr.r ?,! ; Cf1<..?'111<.'5WI_
, t
San.lrnra \\a..
. . 21 ) 0 i' tlw J\rnlhrn Jvnas .Y
f
"
['
.-.
..
,
PrahrnrHd1a,
'
4'"'
22
23
-"
Ent tll.' Jiina.'la (V-0l. 1-3) would have it Lha.t Purn.11 ...
varman was a real historic personage and identical with
liala, who was the 74th ruler of Magadha. It is Sfii(l:
that Hala was also kno,n1 by the surname Puma from
the Yayu Purana verse :
~m: ltif~~t l1_oTT ~ret '~ ll~ffi I
where iflf: is the surname of HaJa.
If, therefore, Purna or Pm1iayarman and lfah l1C'
identical, that would be a further confirmation of the
traditional date of Sankara.
IV. The l\Iadhaviya $ankaravjjaya makes Sn nlrnra
a contemporary of Bana, Mayura and Dandi in the:
slo1rn :
v
'fi'.nflil::rtf;;cr!J
~~il"1f~~1;r w~~M~iflllT~'lit~<fiT{ I
(Sa rgu 15. 141. )'
Professms \Veber, Buhler and Max Muller have fixed
the date of Dandi at the end of the _6th century A. D.
Bana and l\'Iaynra are also known to have li \"Cd in the
beginning of the 7th century. Hence Sankara must have
lived towards the end of the 6th and the beginning of
the 7th century. This piece of independent evidences is
said to confirm the date of P'nrnayarman ~
24
two well-known commentaries on the \vork), as h'td any
reference to the Acharya~ connection with Kanchi. In
sh?1't, the aim of Sri Sastri was to erase all traces
the Bhaga,'atpada's connection with. Kanch.i.
o:f.
25.
V. In China, during the reign of the Chena Vamsa
'kings ( 557 to 583 A. D.), Gaudapada's BhMya on Iswara
._I(rsna',s Samkhya Karika was translate..d intothe Chin~e
1ang;1age. J\'Iost. probably the work was translated in
570 A. D. Since it is not probable that the work would
have been translated du'r ing the lifetime of Gaudapada,
sometime should have elapsed between the death of
Gaudapada . and the translaiio1i of his work. Hence,
of the, 6th
26
21
l k
.k,
~on lS, 111 i.ic
SanY-..ara converted Trirama? Wu it the fi.nit or the A..:i1 S
u
anrmra or
0 f J.:_ .
ILllS
iUwttrious succ~ors '1 Adi Sanlta
em rnent1 . k w.
.
rn was prek
Y a V i sopke7', w1th no sectarian bia~. Ji 'l'ri~t rarna was made a Saiva, it should haV'e h en bv a
a e~ 8ank~u'fl.cbarya with $0mewWit pronomtct>d S~h-a
leanutg-&---pr<.1bably b S h'd
.
,
,
A h
.
y
ale I ananda Ghana the 23rd
c arya <if the Kamakoti Pitha.
'
,
anr
Vf
'
. i , an ara.
.;J Hit
But to m
al.it!
lfl.<! another's atgurnf'nt.
ic; certain!
not to prove one'
.
Y
..
s own case. Havmg shown the urueliA,bili Ly of the dates a<hanced by historia
cxpla.'
. .
Sankara on :-
,]
or 1tetermining
th.u
Wite of"
(2) The
Matha.
''
more anc1ent
u-..
~n ctl
;it1011
t t 11e Srine-eri
~
Sarl .
"~ o a
ujnri of SarvaJnJ.
ilslva Bodha, (b) the Gm uratnamnlilrn of Sada \a
Brabmen?m, a11n (t) Susama) the comrnentmT on Gururatnamahka by Atma Bodha ; and
~N-sf~a~~f.r f.r~;,mljf<?~s
ClfT[nC!I<'( fu<i~ ~: ~ '9' ~':fi=tfo II
Decoding
the
sloka,
af<f~ = 3,
~C!N = 9,
<rlur = 5, and ~ = 2.
Combining these iigiircs,
we get 3952. 'rhis figure must be reversed (as is cu<>to
mary with all chronograms). We get 2593, i.e., 2593
.rears since the beginning of Kali, since all ancient
records refer only to Kali era. Now it i.s a well-known
:fact that the Kali age commenced in 3102 B. C. Hence
'.~593 Kali corresponds to 3102'-2593 = 509 E. C. 'rhis
.is the date of birth of Adi Sankara~ Other detiJ-i.ls .with
regard to his birth arc, that he was born in the cyclic
~ear Nandana, Vaisakha l\fasa., Suklapaksa Panchami,
Sunday, in the constellation 6[ Punarvasu in the Lagna
Dhanus. It is remarkable that 'even to this day, Sankara
. J ayanti is celebrated dl over In1lia on Suklapaksa Pan-
.chmni in Vaisakha Masa, in the constellation of Punarvasu. Henco, Sankar~ lived during the years 509-'177 B.C.
Since then, the Dwaraka. Matha. has had an unbroken
line of nearly 79 Acharyas, Puri has had ovei one hundred and forty Acharyas, and the Kamakoti Pitha., sixtYcight Acharyas, from the great Sankara to the present
Aeharyn. N"o historian could. nfford to ignore these threema.Jor inslituiions and their historic traditions; parli-
28
29
(2) Even Sringeri which has had a chequered histo1y. has a tl'ailit.ion-a mor ancient one-wllich says
that Sankara fl Hll'i!:JlcJ. in !lit 1st cent my B. C., v~. ,
44 B. C. ( Vifie-Sup1a).
(2a) The Govardhana Pitha Guruparampara entirely
agrees with the Dwaraka chronology.
(3) The Kamakoti P itha which alone has had an
uninterrupted history, despite adverse circumstances,
bases its chronology on the historic traditions embodied
'in the P1rnyasloka l\failjari, in the Gururatnamalika, and
in Snsama .
() Punyasloka Manjari is a work consisting of
209 verseoi, <'Olleeted by Sarvajna Sadasiva Bodha, the
(c) Atma
Bodha,
the
disciple
of
Adhyatma
30
31
Wilit
~ ~1
(Jina Vija.ya)
The fot\;going vcrse summarises the life of Kumarila
Hhatta. BrH'n in the village of Jayamangala, on the
banks of -the J'.faharrndi, at th junction of the Andhra
country and Utkalil.desa, Knmarila was an Andhra by
hi1'th, ~on of Yajneswara and Chandra.guna. He was a
formidable debator and a staunch upholder of the Vedas.
1-le helonged to the Krsna Yajus Sakha.
33
32
Now follows the chronogram of the birth of KumarilaBhatta :~<~ ~l\i:lTili: 'fit'<fit<-Jr~<~H:: 11
~Rll~+m:& 'Jill<iiJ06ilitfl~: I
~~: m~~Of~MWl
q:'f mfil~~~fcfi
II
~ffil)~~
~'for~~pt~c~Mt
ilfifil"~.,ra:: ,
<.
or 3138 B.C.
(2) Kali era begins in 36 Yudhisthira era or
3102 B.C.
(3) The Yudhisthira era of the Jains corresponds
to 468 Kali or 2634 B. C.
Now, decoding the foregoing chronogram, :;iW: = 7-,.
cm:: = 7, ~ =0, if&:if~T = 2, i.e., 7702, which, when
reversed, gives 2077 of the Yudhisthira era of tho Jains,
i.e., 2634-2077 = 557 B. C. This is the date uf hirt:h
of Kumarila Bhatta.
J\ext, Chitsukhachrya in his Brhat Sankara Vijnya
says that, Kumarila was older than Sankara hy t"ortyeight years. Hence, Sankara must have been hmn 48
years after Kumarila, that is in 557-48 = 509 fL C.
1'he date of Sankara's meeting with Kumarila i:-i irn1icatcd in the verse :--
l:!;ifii'~if ~ffi~~OO~T~'>l'<t<e~: 11
Rak~aksi.
"' 'f,~;
~~ ~r~N~'l~fe:~ 11
35
-dynastic history, from 2615 Kali to 2554 Kali.
further confirmation of the date of Sankara rn.
Thfo fa
i\p.
IC. Kota
55.
11.
ram:.m,
V rnkatachellam,
chrouology
or
in K1111Plil
Np1il
lv
I H111 or.1',
N \'111h:1t
36
37
12.
38
39
Cl
~~~ :q q~p:<it
are:-
3138 B.C.
3102 n.c.
3076 B . C.
conesponds to
..
.:
(6) According Iv Pauranic nccomlts of Kali (Cf.. .Bhagavata Purana. XII : L 1 ....13) , the dynai;ties that ruled over
!dagadha since the time of the Mahabharata Y.Tar were :
( I ) Barhadra tha dynasty
22 Kings
1006 Yi>.ars
(2) Pradyota
.,
S ,.
J38
(3) Slsunaga
JO
360
(4) Nanda
2 ,.
100
(S) Maurya
,.
12
316 ,.
(6) Sun~
10
300
(7) Kaawa
4
8
(8) Andbra
32
S06
with a total regnaI period of 2811 years. The Maurya. dynast.ytharcfore came into power in 1604, years of the Kali era 9 :r
RMT
II
~1~~~1eft I
!Jtrol~mt ~ ~ <t><ii2~ II
+Ml~ ~sf~~~~)+!~
~~~ ~~~~
~~ i'lf~ ~iii.
:q
~~ ~,<IT
II
,fqtirr ~~ij' ~ I
ln
40
41
~lay,
Chitsukha's work.
Sukra
Surya
Bud ha
Chandra
Gum
Kuja
Born in the
Constellation
Punarvasu
Lagna
-J~ani
I
11
II
42
(b) Vle have - alre:idy shown that Kumarila WM
born in 557 B. C. Bhartrhal'i or Bharti:p1'apancha as he
At the t.in'le crt Bhisma's Niryana, the relative . positions:
of the sun and the mocn :md otber details are dei;m,!bed in
fnH in the 49th chapter of Santi P:uva of the Mahabharnta.
'file details ure as follow : -'lche Month was Muglm, Suklu Paksa, .Ast.ami tithi, an<i
the sun had just reached the f,foridian when winter solstice
{Utta.l'ayana) commenced.
'Fhe mJon was in the constellation Rohini, nearly at ihe
end or the third quarter.
Relative to the moon, therefore, the sun was at 90', since
7;, tlthie hll,(l passed since the previous Ama.vasya (Ch. 273).
Hra.b.masri Sundareswara Sastriga\ of Varahur has shewn .
as a result of elaborate calculations, that the sun was in
longitude 318 3' 20":
'fe!:f<Wc'l~~5l1U
qi;I crn\cFF~<'f:
....
in his
~~ ~s~mr ~rf.rnr~ui!!Oi 1
~~ <\f~i.1smH~<tr ~:~~~;q_
BWm:
~<i~: ~a:
*
meit
"'
,,
;I;
{::!.
11
...:+-
'l'lr: "1r.or1!{~G1mi::t:, 1
'm1T *"r~f?.q efll'~t <r.'1n ~Q~~TG:i!: 11
~m ~~
45
44
{)t SankarH, and son
Now, even historians admit that Bimbisara of the Sais\1naga dynasty was a contemporary of Gautama Buddha. Now,
the !ollowing table gives the regnia.l years of the rul1~r'> from
:Btmbisara to Chandragupta, according to the Matsyrc Purana:
Bimbisara
28 years
Ajatasatru
27 years
Darsaka
24 years
Udasin
33 years
Nahdivarrlhana
.(0 years
!\lahanandin
.(3 years
Mahapadma Nanda and other Nandas
100 year~
295 years
Total
CaAPTEn
II
i
'
47
traditions. In the chofoe of ce11tres for his Ma.tlui3, h'3
a.ppe.a:r Lo futv been prompted by considerations of. prior
.sp:i-rit11al or religiou.~ 11ssoeiatioru of ucli places 01.', somet.iraes, b~ their ha.v ing beeu Lh form r strongholds of
ht"tcsies whicJ1 be i;o $U('MfiBfnlly uproot, d. Besides the
w0H-kriown rout M:ntli.as, viz.1 Lh
.fyo1ir i\laLh at
il11tl~rikas1arua
the Kalika Pitha ut Uwar-akn, the
\'lmitla Pith.a. at .Tagannal h11 and the Sarada l'iLha at
Sring rj, he appears (.(> have founded I -kno~\tl Ma.thas
a~ .E &Si like th.e umcrn an<l Paduk11 MatJ1as and the
nutue.roi;is Nambudri Mat.ha. like Ute V dakk:a.i Madam,
'l'ek.kai Madam, Naduvilai Madam, Tirukkazhikkad l
Madam and the B1ahinc. wam JI fa lam in Malabar,
his native oounby, and many more 1'fat1ins in
many more. plfces. These Matha.c;i,
vidcnily, have
had a heqt1ered history. Som~ fom Mathas al.on~ appear
t.o ha\e su1vived the ravages of time .ancl ru. still th re
with differ nt. degrees of opulenc ~d 'popula1-ity. So'mP.
of the. "Matha. a.ppellr to have been ~wallowed up by th'
returnrng tide o.f. l1eresy. and others have receiv d a
ntercifnl lcnse of humble unpr tentiou, existene .
Ananlla,'!iPi, in his ankara Vijaya, cnumeiate. a
11wnber of Sisya.s oI th Aeharya. They are Padmapada
( ot.hcr:vioo called S1mn.ncbn1:1), lfastamaln.ka, Sru.nitpani,
Chid ,lasn, Jnana.Jrnnda, Visnu Gupta, Kirti, Bhanu- .
rumiclri, Krsna Darsan,a, Bu<ldhi-Vrddlri, Virimchlpada,
-and Hudli11ana.ntanand ndragiri. Iu I.hi list of Si!i as
&, ('numerated by Anaud-agiri, we miss a few famifu '.
1
wim.e . Sureawarach.a,rya is conspicuous by his ahsenei'.
J nother discipJ.e,
Udamka, said lo have been cmetl of
lepr~~! by Sankara, is 111.so n<>t m<'ntioned. But since
1 otaka .is 'Often iden.tifi d will\ Anandagiri, Su dliananta-
49
:wmdendiragiri (or simply Anandagiri) and Totaka ~Y
be identical._ Visnugupta, who is said to have belonged
to the same village as that of the Bhagavatpada, was
later orda.ined as Sanyasi under the name of Chitsukhaehwya. It. was this disciple of Sankara who wr~te the
Brhat Sankara Vijaya, which, unfortunately, 18 not
extant but which Anandagiri claims to follow closely~
Prthirldharnbharati, again, is not mentioned. Probably
he is not different from Hastamalaka, though some think
he is different from Rastamalaka.
\Ve have, at present, accounts of only four :\Iatbas,
enumerated in the popular Mathamnaya stotras (said to
haye been written by the great Sankara himself). Bach
of these Mathas was placed under the care of" one of the
more distinguished Sisyas of the Acharya. We will Just
trace the history of these Mathas as found in the
.M:athamnaya stotras or from a particular work ent~tle<l
the Mathetivrttam (~'l'ffll) which is mater1ally
the same as the others.
At the very outset, it should be remembered that
each l\fatha hns.its own version of Matharnnaya, and th.at,
consequently, there are striking differences even with.
r-egard to some fundaim:ntal details. For the. benefit. of
the reader who may be curious to be acquainted w1.th
the contents of the Mathamnaya texts, we summarise
here the details of the Mathctivrttam which i<; Sringeri
sponsored.
Venkatachellam.
pp. 114).
(Chronicle of Nepal
History
(Mathetivirtham 7-9)
'
50
51
(4) fG;aM"~\lUIDl!T
~)~~mt~~ I
an~<JTU ~: u~zy:rrs~ fu~ 11
~rfu ~TCclfTaT~ fuf{i:r~i:fWTU: I
~~r (<fir)~ir: ~ ~crcrr ~ Ul'.fcl ~ 11
~cft i.fr~fl' ~~r an:qr~: ~)~ : ~=
52
-53
~r.t "f;r ( Prnjn:umm Brahm.a} is
,l\1111.ha Ii.
m~ ~tr:
'!il,ifillf: ffi'7
51)'ffi
~~:qJU<:J'f.m<n: I
~ '3f ..nf ~+rrrhr:, II
(Mathetivrtta.Q.o!.
(-6~
54
55
111ul 111nrt.i11l looki111{ ini'aniry, with the multitude of gayfcwloow~, 1lihnt.1nH, cliamaras and Vyajanas--that were'
inl11t1cl n Hig-ht. for gods to see, a sight that simply overwlwhnH th'3 host of Sisyas with a sense of incomparable
dignity and awe. Again, lik:e the Pope who commands
the allegiance of all Christendom-the Catholic world at,
l~as~the Acharyas of Sringcri dominate the Hindu:,
worJd. Their disciples are legion, in all parts of India.
+t"if
+r~CI. II
+m:al
au II
R1~m<ilnr":u0!~l1ilffi!'~<ru: '
~~~ ~ ~iiTUil:~'l'ffi I
~~wr~;q wrcit~'!'~n: 1
lffQ<li:
~~if ~:sif'ft~<tit4qr: II
il
(Mathetivrttam,
_ ~: q~~@'.:irt m\~r;.fto{Tft>~r: 11
11-1~
8..
.5'1
56
~itl~6'".{i~l@'f ~H::e1'1flztr~<f,: I
BftU"i{"~'I':l~{~l~5i~~: I
izn;ij-~<rr ~~, ~cn'<fi~rr<Jf~rnr: u
~!'-6f~!if{ifil;:41f;;TCff~ll?J~fct~FTQ: I
;;o~rfim><ror~~l {~~~ilfl.:4Cif: 11
u (35)
\Vith a
ids one
ominion,
'etrimcnt
touch of high politics, the l\fathamnaya for.\.charya from encroaching into another's
lest it should lead to ~1 J nabbles, much to the
o:C the lofty ideals in view : !fHr.r~fq~11\' ~ >J~m 'i 'fii\f'T.f'f l
~1~;:~~;:1~: a:f<I:
(25)
*
ill qf{Cfr'llq_:
*
(26)
~hagavatpada
59
53
CHAPTER
III
~~~:m~fa~ ~~!l<l<ftjl=!T~~cr14G:Tc+rr
fqsrq~r~~ffi ll~fcr +i'!+l~roi'tfc:i~;w;01r;q 11
<firi:rq;)fa":
~ffi'
"'
ma.=r:
~qp.t '<l'g~Cli: t
;rffi
~ifi'f ~~1 ~ I
5'fcrlUa ~ II
~ ~fcl ~ I
~~ft ~
5i)'W1lfi'f
~'lr.ilif..--
(6) The manuscripts of the Anandagiriya Sankaravijaya in the Rama Taraka Matha library at Kasi, re-fer
to the Pratistha of the Srichakra of Kamaksi, and to
the Y ogalinga being handed over by the Bhagavatpada
w the ' custody of Sureswaracharya with his Matha at'.
Kanchteepuram. Anandagiii further refers to the'"
61
60
estnblishmeut. of' the six-fold paths worship
lwvin~; t:.iken place at Kanchi ::-
c~~)
~I f.\~J1 qJJfl?.l+JtTit~ :er mrir~<rt ~~~~- "{'q'%nrriii.~ f;:nrfil"'-7 ~ire~~ ~ir ~ t etc. (Anand. Sank. Vij.
GG 11 I> ::iknrn.na).
l'he mo,..t valtmb1r picc oi in:f rmai.ton tlia~ nandag~i fur11Lhes us \V-ith i. thal the Hlia~ mt.paaa attained
V1deha M11kti ai KanclU : -
Srichakra at Kanclrl :-
~ ~ ~~~ 'l~<ilae
q'3f~~~~~ll
(9) The l\fadhaviya Sankara Vijaya takes care tosec that the Bhu.ga.vatpada, after founding the Matha ai;
Sringeri, goes north to Kashmir and th~mce to Kedara.
There he is said to have been petitioned by all the Devas
to return to Kailasa, and accordingly he ic; said to have
:ascended corporeally to bis abode. In other words,
Kanchi does not at all figure, in this work, as the final
scene of Sankara's life.
This version of the Madhaviya Sankara Vijaya is quite
understandable, in as much as any admission of Kanchi
ru: ' the anal scene of Sankara's activity~ woulrl he tanta1.t101mt t<' recognising the authenticity of the Kamakoti
Pitha which he established there. Hence such an admission is not to be expected from the :M:adhaviya Sanlrnra'
Yijaya.
. Nevertheless, the writers of the two comme.nhi.ries,
'Dindima and Advaita Laksmi, on the Madhaviya Sankara
Vijaya, quote profusely from both Anandagiri's and
Chitsukha's Sankara Vi;jayas, citing passages to show
th'lt Kanchi was the final scene of Sankara'<; life, and
not ascension to Kailasa as described in the J\fauhaviya.
Rankara Vijaya.
{10) A work entitled 'Sankara Vijaya Vilasa' gives
an elaborate description of how the Bhagavatpada per~uaded a king of the name Rajasena to build temples to
Vamdaraja Ekambareswara and Kamaksi at Kanehi, and
how he ascended the Sarvajna Pitha at the same place.
{Sankara Vijaya Vi1asa, slokas 6 to 61, ch apt. 25).
(11) An old manuscript work (printed at the Mangafo<layam P:ess, Trichur, 1926), called the Sankaraeharya
Charitra by one Govindanantha, found in th(! Nambud6
62
63
-\l:1t.l'ns in ~~blabar, testifies to the fact that, after tour111g 1ou11d lrnlia, Sankara finally reached Kanchi : -
to Sankara's
connection with Kanchi : (a) Sri llarsa, in his Naisada Kavya refers tc>The commcntat~rs .:\lalli~1atha ~ncl
Narayrma, explaining. the passage m qucst10n, wnte :
The allusion here is to the Yogalinga which the Adi
S:mkara cons.cerated and -installed in the Kamakoti Pitha
in Kanchi, and nominated Sureswaracharya to supervise
its proper worship. Though I-Iarsa may be guilty of an
mrnchronism in alluding to the Yogalinga in his Naisada
Kavya, he is referring to a very well-known fact-viz.,
the fact of the Yoga Linga being worshipped in the
Kamakoti Pitha at K~nchi as recounted in the Si.varahasya
and lHarkandeya Samhita : -
'7<='fifa-Cfi'l:1f<TTtPTiil?cT;i:: I
<f.p:;l'ff
~reor+r<F.rar g; <:ft<r~~mr~~~ I
~gt ~-TRt+r'ir:T
ij'
~eou.q: 11
II
1:;
<irvft fa~
II
~ J;ifl"i~+f'fij'f
m+l't"'( ~'f.~~Cfi: I
~t S;l'\"~rr~fu~ ~ ~~ 11
6.~
"'
ai~fif 11.a- ~c:r~ill'l ~ Rrnfu 11
~fo(!+iR+i~<r , ~1~rP.-
ti
1 ,,
11
:q
<fill~{{, I
(G. R. M. 30)
Having, with supreme ease, quelled all the scholars in
argument-scholars who had flocked to Kanchi-Sri Sankara
established his intellectual supremacy and as1~ended the
8ar\ajna Pitha-the throne of Omniscience ai Kanchi-
<f.f~=<;<:ff
q;f~ftwrift
67
.
at Kanchi the Sarnda Matha
Sri Sank-ara establt.shed
d from the snow-clad
P"tha
renowne
.
1
'
or the Kamakoti
f
the administration
Himalayas to the southern s;ha:as peculiar to the
anJn tne enforcement of all
fom castes : -
....
;fl
~:
~..+.> ~
oi1~
111ti:it1~~6l4
.s~. "' -=--~raitii "' 1 ~~R ~it
~t1n1<ti:TX(+f1Ao
=if
rt
~-
"
cw:f26TWTIOl'Tlif'110:
~~~-
h .
~
"'
th t Atmabodha emp az1ses
~
ft is worthy of note . a lf - the first Acharya of
fact that Sri Sankara h1mse was
h Kamakcti Pitha.
t e
t Bhagavatpada
(4) The Videha Mukti of the greaplace at Kanchi
. allY 8 tated to have taken
is unequivoc
(33 '
~f~ q=t ~: etc.
J
.
A tmabodha writes that the
Explaining this passage,
,.
lf in the Chidakasa at
lly merged nimse
.
Bhagavatpada fi na
~ ~ ~Of: ~~
;r
Kanehi :-,-...~qr
,~~1"'t...,' ....
,.i:<f1'1tl'( ~ it W~
Ir ( Susama., 33)
nra-: ~: ~~:
B h
"''<:l
d
d
by
Sadasiva
ra
f . the evidence ten ere
So muoh .or
d. Atmabodha.
d
men ra an
dehce
.
11 these documentary eVI . r
( 15) There is, besides ~
h ld go a long way in
1 f t re which s ou
h
a remarkab e ea u .
d 1
No place other t an
confirming the fore_gomg eta1 sdius of about fifty miles
t environs to a ra
f
Kanchi an d l s .
. .
f the sacred memory o
.13 SO ri_.
'"h with associatloIL'> o
itself : -
Sanka.rt.
of
Surnadhi.
( c) In the unei nt dilapidated . temple (recently renovated) at Sivasthanam, in Teuambakkam on the eouthern
bank of the river Vcgayati, there is a plaque behind tl::.e
I,inga in ihe sanctum which repr ut Sri Sankara a.s
o.tr,~ring obeisance to Siva and Parvati.
( d) In Tiruvottiyur, six miles north oJ.' Madras,
there is un image of Sankara installed in the temple of
Tripuraslllldari, whose Ugrakala (fierceness) the great
B11fl!!'avatpall.a is said to have mollified. So, too, in
Mangadu, fifteen miles west of Madras, there is a Meru
P1asthn -of Sri Yantra, said to have been installed by
tl1(! gr at Sankara himself. An image of Sankara is also
found installed in the temple.
68
69
city.
i'
.
cent. B.C.)
J. Cf.
8lftT ~f<i5"~%.'S'1~Jie;:-:Gl{
=-:---a-n-::d --:~::-~-~-::~
.-=-~-,-"'l-~-'f'9rt-<.;i--~
=
--.,~--
~rct5f~~:
'"''~''"~'
70
71
8S4 A.D.)
(6) Boclha II, the 44th pontiff (1061-1098), has been
irl~ntified witlt Soma Deva, the author nf Katha Sm~it
8agara, and he was a contemporary of' King Knlasa of
K nshmir ( 1063-85).
(7) Chandrasekhara III, the 45th Acharya, otherwise known :is Chandrachuda (1098-1166), is said
have
defeated tf1e Jain teacl1er H~Qha.ryn. in the court, of
Kumarapaia. Vidyalola, a Chalukya prince, (114::{-1172
A.D.). He was also held in high esteem by ;Jayasimha,
king of Kashmir. (1127 to 1149 A.D.)
( 8) Advaitananda Bodha or OhidvilnSfl, the 16th
Acharya. (ll66-1700), is said to have defeated Sri Haraha.
in argument-the famous Sri Harsha, the author oi
in sua.msion, if we
~cbatya.
ucludo the
Bhaga.viupada and
~.
.D.)3
, ~~ 1 ! A second copper lat . . , . .
of i1i1mrnt'asimha n".,
P c mscr1pt10n of the reign
[)
J.:l
e1 d. <>lrfr<-:t son 0 f ''T
.
nar;isa. Na.yaka,
1" '" ue1 bl'oth!'-1 11 ( K 14''9 .
JJ.'1slm:i l l'Vl11'<1Vll,
'.J..'Jie ,\,'l':l" 1-S Sft,,..._
- ' t.~ .. . ;J07 A. D. (No. II).
.
'
, ilJv.
( l... 1 .>\IHI 1111' I" U1S<'l'ip1 .
'
si:1 nw dri1r
(T
. . mu al I hp ~<I lllP ,. i.,.11 md o
.
. nsCl'1ptinn TII)
"'
'
L
(J:l\
roppm 1 t
.
KJisJ1n"
~
, p u r lllSCT'1ptio11
I' the. reign of
' ........ tOVltrarn o-1: v.
n
A. D. '"To. 1V).
JJC!}'itnagn. <Salm 1444,. :-. e., 1522
the
ca $e lS: not
lJ M. Subramanva A
Bahad s
yyar assures us th t ti
SJ1alti dynastv of ~o!hab of Deihl, but Thanr Sh:!1 donor iri this
Madarma H. tier . conda, whose min 1
of the Kutb
same as that i~ c:o~c;; tbl e J~gir ~eferred
~rslhfse~e A.k~anna and
J> ate mscnption No. X.
ll1Rcr1p1Jon JS th
tg
72
73
f.lm::"'l1<ll1afirfu- 11*
CHAPTER
IV
<.,.
Mackenzie.
75
74
Sisya Pith11s. Nevertheless, considering Sureswara's eminence, cq ua} io his own, and considering his great yogic
powers, the Bhagavatpada entrusted him with the control of all Pithas, Thus Sureswara, in his capacity of
Controller-General, stayed for some time in each of the
Pitlrns-(and prohabl~, paid pe1-iodic visits)-stabilising
those inst;itntiom:. llern~e it is that all M:athas in.dude
Snreswara in their line of succession after Sankara : -
;:i-
f.t~fU(l)sRt l:"l'B+!T'l~:'.';""-Tm~lfl
G{f~"+!Wr: ~ ~q
'rotl'i'.ffijlC(
n5r
a~
Pfi<r;:oRln: ;;r,r<9g<!Hi r
(Snsama).
This information, furnished by Atmabodha is highly
revealing. Properly understood, this will set at rest all
those endless squabbles over the question of Smeswara
being the first Acharya of Sringeri or of Dwaraka or
~vrm of Jagannatha.
Let us first of all unravel the mystery of Sureswarac harya 's 11lace in the Sringeri Gurupararnpara. Ths
Sringeri calendar assigns the date 28 B. C. to Sur eswan i 's
accession to Sringeri throne. This date is far behind the
date assigiled to him by the Kanchi calendar. According
protectorate
to the Kanchi calendar, Sureswara's
extendec1 from ,:176 B.C. to 406 B.C. Hence, there is a
huge gap of 378 years between the dates assigned by
the Ka nchi and Sringeri calendars. ~or is thi:;; all. The
Sringeri calendar endows him with a life of 800 :nars.
He is said to have lived up to about 772 A. D. If we
shoi tld be guided by the Kanchi calendar n'l well, we
wo1~ 1d then have Sureswara living for an incredible span
.
m
: .1
accordmg to the Kanch1 calendar. This
huge mterrugnum is really bewildering.
. Ntir i this tJw only disrI'<'panc~'- Aftrr Sut'f'SWlll"ll pass11lt!. !l\:1.1Y in772~\ .D., heis~aicl tolrn chceu s11cceccledbv
om J: 1tyab~dhugJl.'1J.lll who is frll>ntified with 8:u1~1..jn:l;
rnan'
fust pu1 hrnl st ~c"s.~r aft<'r Sankara on the
Ku.ncbr P11lia. ..1\er.ording to the Kanchi calenihu-, Sar'VaJna~an att.nined ternal :pe~te in 3fl4 B C., <1ft r a
lon~ .reign C>f I L2 year.. F1<>m 364 B. C. to 772 A-. D. i
a far c1T. Tlow eoul I Sarvajnatmnn. d('nd in 364 B C.,
sncc.ee~ to I lie Sringel"i Pilha in 772 A. D. 'i Con irlt~Ja.hl<'
cool.umon nreva.ils in tbC' early histor,\ of the Sringeri
Matha.
t!ie .
C.
76
77
nnd Sarvajnatman, belonging to the Kamakoti Pithathe Pitha of the great Acharya himself-must han' been
ac~orded high honours by the firnt Aclrnryas of all the
other lHilthas ; so that, between the Bhagavatpada and
themselves they filled in the revered nnmes of the elderly
Bureswara and the young Sarvajna in their spil'itual
geneology. Thmi, the first Achar:va of Sringeri, nominated
by Sankara himself, was Prithvidhara (or Prithvidhava) 1
[Sri N. Venkatrama.n, however, seems to regard Pri1.hividhara as being identical with Sureswarn. (Sankaracharya and his successors in Kanchi, page 10). But
Atmabodha thinks otherwise.] But Prithvidharacl1arya,
_though realty the first Acharya of that line afte1' Sankara,
waives off that honour and prefers to considP.r himself
as successor in the line after Snreswara and Sarvajnatman (or Nityabodhaghana, as Sringeri chronides call
him). The Kudali-Sringeri records, (Hultzsch Mss),
contain a very suggestive verse : -
izfq<fl':l'<NiNl~tt~1~zjirt\;rfij-51~~1;i:_ I
a~ ~
""
~fu'a:
11
(Susama.).
~~Us'lia<J~
~efti:rq: ~ ~fiT~T
. ~f~q~~~~ ~[fqig~f~'<i
~~T f~(f ~ ~~Hil't ~~ ~Cf{l'.:ffO.f ~ 11 etc.
,
(Punyasloka l\fanjari).
Since Viswarupa is one of the names by which Sures
wara too is often known, this new Viswarupa was easilJ'
78
identifa.1 with Snreswara, and the tradition gained grournl
that Sureswara, a/ins Viswarupa occupied th0 pontifical ,
throne of S1ingcri, and the history of the Sringcri. Matha
it'iell' was tra.ccd from his times (circa 28 B.C.), and
Sankam himself -vvas made to live just prior to 28 B. C.
(J4 to 12 B. C.), so as to make Viswarupa's succession
immediate after
Sankara. This Viswarupa was then
.,
mcc{;edcd by Nityabodhagana (v.Tongl:v identi.ficd with
Sn-v ajnatman), ,T nanaghana, J nanottarna. Siva, ,T nana~i.ri, Simhagiri, Iswara Tirtha and finally the famous
Vidya Sankara Tirtha. 'l'his last Acharya who lived for
105 years, is generally assigned the date (1229-1333) in
the Sringerj calendar, su that Bharat Krsna 'rirtha, the
brother of Vidyaranya, might succeed him without any
break in the line. But according to the 'l'hcosophist
(Vol. XVI, pp. 292-96), Vidyasankara appears to have
died in 5G9 A.D. at Nirmala on the Bombay coast, on
Kmtika Sukla Trayodasi. After him, until Bharati
Krsna Tirtha occupies th~ throne of the restored Sringeri
Matha, i.e., from 569 A.D. to 1333 A.D., there was an
interrugnum of 764 years during which the Matha had
no history at all. Though this appears to have been
the real state of affairs, the Sringeri cafondar adju.~ts the
period 28 B. C. to 1333 A. D., thus :.::......
(a) Viswarupa (confounded with Sureswara) 28 B.C.
to about 772 A. D.
( b) The other Acharyas,
Viclyasankarn, from about 772
an unbroken line of suceession
by endowing Viswarupa with
800 years.
28 B
B. C t<>
Prithilost
B.C. fo
"
~'"Y
,
11() -.
' -eJ';ii:(ft..-"~i:tm:r
-.
-.-..., I
=~~r<1-41-1<'(.
~l!fu; ~ ~1~fltt!\
~
...
8!rlffi1{'{1m+1~r~at ~q<A:.
'f S'Q!"fq-Blffi{:
(Susama)." This must be bome in . d
After
the Bh
d
mm
held
agavatpa a, w.tien elever. pontiffs had
S .
sway, there were n1' Aehru.7a in th
Sarada. M ~,,.t. "
e.
rmgen
"'hlJ.a ior e~ght hundred ve!l.l'S ") 'l'h
.
of this
'
e w:oter
A<lha
comment., as one closely associated with the
ryas of tht~ Kamakoti Pitha
d
..
histol'ian should hav kn
' a~ . as lts accredited
h
.
e
owu the inti m.ate detail .
f
t e history of both the K
h'1
d
.
" o
W-0 should, tJ1ci;efor b Ii ~~
an Srmgeri Mathas.
that the S ., , .
' e eve is words w.Mn he savs
He doe rmgen Matha ceased to exist for 800 ye~s:
s not seek to fill up th
.
endowina v
e mterrugnum by
"' ISwarnpn (-0r any one elR.e) with 800
TJ
years_
,.
ie,<:i o
rrnger1 all
ti
s1on to be broken
d th
ow ie sucees-for 800yeru:s f Whan
us allo~ the Mat}rn to lapse.
\)('.CLUTed it
S ~n, on a. p1ev101ts occasion, a break
'
sent u ~ta V.Jswarnpa to t&ke ~hmge of
's .
81
80
Sringeri. (Vide supra). Later on in 1333 A.D., it sent
Bharati Krsna Tirtha to revive the Sringeri Matha as
also to found eight more Mathas. Why was it 1 then,
that the Kamakoti Pitha allowed an interrugnum of 800
years to pass without nominating anyone during that
period 7 Atmabodha, in this connection, gives but a
glimpse of the chaotic nature of the times. We have to
l'eronstruc:; the history of the Karnataka from other
so11rces.
First, the Kamakoti Pitha itself was passing through
difficult times from 5th century A.D. onwards. Bauddhas,
,Jainas, Kapalikas and Saktas had regained their supremacy in Kancheepuram, rendering peaceful existence
impossible for the Kamakoti Acharyas. :B'u,:rther, Kanchi
was in a state oi panic due to the periodic incursions
of the Kaiabhras, of whom very little is known. The
unsettled conditions of the times may be gleaned to
so:rnc extent from the Matta Vilasa, a play of the late
7th centur,Y A. D. in which the excesses of Bauddhas,
~fainas and Kapalikas arc caricatured. Hence,
the
Kamakoti Pitha itself was constantly on the move, far
away from Kancheepuram, as can be seen from the fact
that most of the Acharyas died far aw.ay fronL Kanchi,
and their successors belonged to the same places where
the prr.decessors had died. Thus the Kanchi Matha waA
itself havinl:! a precarious existence amidst the pplitica1
and religious turmoil of the times.
Passing on to a consideration of what happened to
Sringeri, we must peep through the dense haze of time
to get a bluned picture of what was happening then.
This is the religious and political background :---
Karnata'ka h~s, from very early times, been a stronghold of extrfm1st types of Saivism, apart from its having
been in the grip of Jainism as vvell. The entire countrv
,vas studded with the .Mathas of Kalamukhas. Srisaila~
was the centre of Kapalika and Kalai:nukha activities.
There was, again, Vira Saivism, the fore-runner of the
Basaya cult, and hence much older than the Basava
enlt. The Vira Saivas claim that theirs is the oldest
religion in the world. They claim that Revana Siddha
or Renukaeharya, one of the first five great Acharyas
of their cult, presented the 'Adi Bhagavatpada with a
Linga ~qfaCf.T~w-the
present
ChandraSpJiatika
mauliswara worshipped by the Sringeri Pitha 2, They
go so far as to say that the Ifrhat Sankara Vijaya has
fl chapter entitled the 'Siddha Sankara Samvada' wherein the con n~rsation of the two Acharyas is -said 'to have
been dfScrihed in detail, and more, that Sankara himsell was persuaded to believe that Lingaradhana was
snpc;rior to any other form of worship. Whatever such
claims may mean, there is some more information-and
very valuable information at that~forthcoming with
regard to Sringeri and Vira Saivas. There is a pas~
in the Guravamsa Kavya, published under the authorlty
of the Sringeri Matha which contains tw-0 tell-tale slokas :
~i::iJ~l'clU~~~
t~ :) <ii~1"'414~h'llit'1flift;=zy:r itif\N~ I
82
83
lifit~~w-~~
~c<iT ~1r{r~ R{if't~a
ml":
~<LiJ;q'rTcl~iurr G"1~r<rct1J.. 11
&-.,.;qrf~TT~rnf~ii!r
according
to the
fii"I ;qr'FIGrsfl'i~IJ.. 1
siddha JWahayogi
Vira Saivas.
u ~c;urrfti~B>r~r<rs:rc;f~;rr~ I
11
(SL 9-11).
The Guruvam&'lJ Kavya, in its 5th and 6th sargas, gives
a detailed account of how Harihara and Bukka (the
founders of Vijayanagar), took asylum in a forest, after
having been routed by Iring Ballala. Revanasiddha
appeared before; them in their dreams, and {)njoined
them to visit and worship the famous fonga ')handramauliswara, and to enlist the services of Vidyaranya
for regaining their kingdom.
Hence, there appears to be much trnth in the conclusion arri;:ed at by Sri II. Krishna Sastri, that "the
Keladi chiefs who were mostly followers of the Veerasaiva religion were devout adherents of the Sringcri
Sankara.chmya Math, perhaps also for the same reason
viz., that the Sankaracharyas were followers of the
Rcvanasiddha Sarnpra.daya. This explains perhaps why
in the A dvaita Math of Sringeri there is still a greater
bias towards Shaivisrn and Sbaiva worship than towards
Vaishnavism and Krishna worship, though the founder,
the great Shanka.racharya was no l'CSpector of creeds.
nor of anv distinction between Siva and Vishnu."
f Prefa.ee
'
to Shlvatatva Ratnakara--Il.
Krislma Sastrl)
84
85
86
87
+rijT~'i
e1
c::
:q- ij"1~fiM{,
fuq,
Bf[~iif~~'
:a:r~o~igr<i;:zy:-ol!T:
'~firS:iH~:,
"
:a:fiF'Ho/G.'
.::...s:
'(1q11:T
~~'Efili _..Fi'fiTlfr~~o51fufmT':
ana devotion
to his
Vidya Sankara 4.
Gurus
composed
the monognm
ir~ tl'~fll~
etc. t Susama).
'rhe latest chronicles of Sringcri would, however,
draw a veil over this eight-hundred-year-eclipse of Sringeri,
and rewrite the entire history of the Matha thus : - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - - --------------4. mi:4' ~;qf'!i f.leyr('fl~~<R1'l';:q<Tf : ;rrm fct~r{O<T r.r~mr'fi{
Q''"fT<l!'f,
88
89
(3) Nityabodhaghana
( 4) Jnanaihana
reveal
some
( 5) J nanottamasiya:
( 6) ,Jri anagiri
(7) Simhagiri
From 820 to 1333 A. D
( 8 ) Iswa,i:a 'l'irtha
( 9) N rsimha Tirtha:
(10) Vidyasankara
.( ll ) Bharati Krsna Tirt:&a to Abhinava
'1'irtha, 1333 to the present day,
Vidya'.
90
91
In 1811, Krishnarajendra III of Mysore allowed Narasimha Bharati (180'7-20 ) of the Kudali Matha to go
-0n Digvija~a, having recognised his titles to his being
the Jagadgurn.
Digvijaya.
During the reign of the 52nd Acharya of Kudali
( ci:rca 1723 ! , the Acharyas of Kuda.li, Sankheswa:ra and
Neo-Sringeri l\fathas, met at Satara, during the reign
of Sahu, the successor of Sivaji. The question as to
which Acharya \Vas to be accorded Agra Puja was veheml)ntly discussed. Pinally, the issue was settled by
deciding thnt the Acharya of Kudali aJone was entitled
to Agra Puja. ( Vide--History of Sankheswar<>, Matha).
his absence, Sankara Bhara.ti, after his
to stay at Kudali.
return, was
obliged
92
'l'he Ka11ntaka was divided into a number of diocese
93
ltfatha Guruparampara, and Astottara Sata Namavali on
Nrsimh~ Dharati Swami. This enlightened ruler of 2\iysore
was so devoted to the Acharya of Sringeri, that, for the
first time in the anuals of Neo-Sringeri. the Acharya waa
penr,itted to go on Digvijaya. And when the Acharya
sent a Srimukha intimating- bis proposed visit to the
citizens of Madras in 1860, he was assured by the
President of the Association of the Citizens of Madras
that, His Holiness was most welcome, prnviclr.d that !1is
rno,emcnts and activities during the tom wet\: such a'1
wonld not offend the dignity of the Karnakoti Pitha
\Yh;se spiritnal jurisdiction comprised l\Iadras and South
India.
The Aclrnrya of (Neo.) Sringer! then gave :m assur:.ance in 1v1iting, that he and his followers would never
J.e)lort then:selves in any manner derogatory to the dig_nity of the Kamakoti Pitlm. ( Vidc--Appendix B).
95
94
:.Siba>cl'Nm
:S.jg_~x
cDdfut;>~
l'\:lC:o
~os'tir~51!llll"~ ;3~~
etc.
~Page 16 of
the Nirnaya Patra,
issued by Sri
Vedantaramanuja Swami). " It is clear that the decision:
arrived at by Gurram Venkanna Sastrulu that the"
present Sringeri Acharyas, who reaJ.ly beloug to tlie
Parampara of Vidylll'anya, are not the rightful
masters of the Vidyapitha established at Sringeri by the
Bh<tgava tpada, is perfectly incontrovertible and we full,r'
endorse the view."
At nny rate, all this evidence would show that the
present Sringeri Matha is not the Paramount .Matha thatit claims to be.
associated with Dwaraka, namely, that he was for sometime teacher of Brahmaswarupa who succeeded to the-throne at Dwara~a. Consequently the identification of
Brabmaswarupa with Sureswarachar.ra must also be
wrong.
A consi4erable part of Sureswara's seventy years asprotector was spent at Ka,nchi . The Brhat Sankaravijaya
itself records how the Bhagavatpada himself commanded
Surcswara to be protector of all Mathas without being
specifically nominated to rule over any Pitha in
particular :if ~'ft ~r~~mf~
iilirfq iftorfer-q-(~
11
96
from the Paudya country, on the banks of Tampra.parni.
A real prodigy even in his seventh year, he e\rolrnd the
admiration of the great Bhagavatpada himself, who was
hi:::nself a prodigy of the first order. Ordained in Sanvasa
by the gr.eat Sankara himself, he was nominated su~cesc
sor to ihe 1\amakoti Pitha--a worthy snecessor to
a worthy Guru.
Sarvajnatman seems to have been eonsiderablv indebted
to 8uresw<'.ra for instructions in ccrtrtin b;an ches of
philosophy. H e gratefully remembers him and offers
him obeisance in the opening s1okas of his Sanksepa
Sariraka : -
l!l'T ~~H~if;~{~'Hi'tF-!iim~:
~ij~rc+rfrr{lsf~ctr ~CR: B~r.r~rrut'iJ:l 11
~ ffo;r.f~~<{~~ ~~rlf~~ ~q
~'Tiic'i~o<aref.t ;r~ ~<.7-rf~~ ~r.f ~rnm 11
97
Chola (870--901 A.D.) and by others with one Manukuladitya, a ruler of Travancore who " flomished in
T r avancore at the end of the tenth century " (K. A. N.
Sastri, A History of India, p. 34Q).
But on cl~e1 examination, the term Manuknladitya
looks more like an epithet r ather than a proper name.
As we have already pointed out, it is too ha:-:ardous to
'bas~ the determination of dates on mere names. But this
The s~cond discovery of i:he historians is that Sarvajnatman was a contemporary of a king named Manutruladitya, who has been identified by some with Aditya
'S 7