Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Notices 35865

AT&M requested that the Department Department will make the change as diamond sawblades from the People’s
modify the language used in the requested by AT&M to ensure that the Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The revised
Department’s customs instructions to Department’s intent is clear to CBP. weighted–average dumping margins are
read ‘‘on exports where Cliff (Tianjin) Thus, the Department will include included in the ‘‘Antidumping Duty
International, Ltd. acted as the exporter language in the customs module Order’’ section, below. For the revisions
and facilitator for the AT&M entity, indicating that exports where Cliff to the calculations for all companies, see
imports are eligible to claim the (Tianjin) International, Ltd. acted as an Ministerial Error I&D Memo.
antidumping duty rate’’ for AT&M. See exporter and facilitator to AT&M, the
importer is eligible to claim AT&M’s Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
AT&M’s letter to the Department dated 351.224(e), we are amending the final
May 23, 2006. Though this suggestion antidumping duty rate.1
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR determination of sales at LTFV in the
does not constitute a ‘‘ministerial’’ error 351.224(e), we are amending the final antidumping duty investigation of
within the meaning of section 351.224(f) determination of sales at LTFV in the diamond sawblades from the PRC. The
of the Department’s regulations, the antidumping duty investigation of revised dumping margins are as follows:

DIAMOND SAWBLADES FROM THE PRC - WEIGHTED–AVERAGE DUMPING MARGINS

Weighted–Average
Exporter Producer Deposit Rate

Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. ....................... Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. 2 2.82%

Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd. ............................................... Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd. 35.51%
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. ................................................................................... Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. ................... Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Danyang Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd. ..................... Danyang Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd. ........................ Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd. ......................... Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd. ................................. Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd. 48.50%
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd. .............................. Danyang Aurui Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd. .............................. Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd. ....... Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd. ........................................... Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd. ........................................... Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. 21.43%
Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. ................... Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd. ...................... Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd. .................................................. Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co., Ltd. ...................... Hua Da Superabrasive Tools Technology Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd. ................... Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd. .............. Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Sichuan Huili Tools Co. ....................................................... Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Sichuan Huili Tools Co. ....................................................... Sichuan Huili Tools Co. 21.43%
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. ........... Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. ...................... Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. 21.43%
Xiamen ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. ................................... Xiamen ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd. .............................. Danyang Dida Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd. .............................. Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd. .............................. Wuxi Lianhua Superhard Material Tools Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd. ................................. Zhejiang Wanli Super–hard Materials Co., Ltd. 21.43%
Zhenjiang Inter–China Import & Export Co., Ltd. ................ Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 21.43%
PRC–Wide Rate .................................................................. .................................................................................................... 164.09%

Continuation of Suspension of This determination is issued and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Liquidation published pursuant to sections 735(d)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act. International Trade Administration
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct Dated: June 15, 2006. [A–588–835]
CBP to continue to suspend liquidation David M. Spooner,
Oil Country Tubular Goods from
of all entries of subject merchandise Assistant Secretary for Import Japan: Notice of Intent to Rescind
from the PRC. We will also instruct CBP Administration. Antidumping Duty Administrative
to require cash deposit or the posting of [FR Doc. E6–9874 Filed 6–21–06; 8:45 am] Review
a bond equal to the estimated amount by BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
which the normal value exceeds the AGENCY: Import Administration,
U.S. price as indicated in the chart International Trade Administration,
above. These instructions suspending U.S. Department of Commerce.
liquidation will remain in effect until SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

further notice. (the Department) is conducting an

1 The Department will also include such language 2 Including Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Industrial Co., Ltd. as an exporter when
in its cash deposit instructions to CBP. Company as an exporter when merchandise was merchandise was also produced by Yichang HXF
also produced by Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Circular Saw Industrial Co., Ltd.
Products Company, and Yichang HXF Circular Saw

VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:08 Jun 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1
 35866 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Notices
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on oil country
tubular goods (OCTG) from Japan in
response to a request by United States
Steel Corporation, one of the petitioners
in the original investigation (Petitioner).
Petitioner requested administrative
reviews of JFE Steel Corporation (JFE),
Nippon Steel Corporation (Nippon),
NKK Tubes (NKK) and Sumitomo Metal
Industries, Ltd. (SMI). This review
covers sales of subject merchandise to
the United States during the period of
August 1, 2004 through July 31, 2005.
We preliminarily determine that JFE
and NKK had no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of review (POR), and that
Nippon and SMI had no reviewable
sales of subject merchandise during the
POR. Accordingly, we preliminarily
determine that the review of these four
companies should be rescinded in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
See the ‘‘Intent to Rescind the
Administrative Review’’ section of this
notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Hoadley or Jun Jack Zhao, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3148 or (202) 482–
1396, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 11, 1995, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on OCTG from Japan in the Federal
Register (60 FR 41058). On August 1,
2005, the Department published a notice
of opportunity to request an
administrative review of this order (70
FR 44085). On August 31, 2005, the
Department received a timely request
for review from Petitioner, covering JFE,
Nippon, NKK and SMI.1 On September
28, 2005, we published a notice
initiating an administrative review of
the antidumping order on OCTG from
Japan. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
1 The Department found SMI and Sumitomo
Corporation (SC) to be affiliated in a previous
review. See Oil Country Tubular Goods From Japan;
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64 FR
48589, 48591 (September 7, 1999). Neither SMI nor
SC has placed information on the record of this
review suggesting that the basis for this finding has
changed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:08 Jun 21, 2006 Jkt 208001
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
The Department issued the original
questionnaire on October 27, 2005. On
November 16, 2005, JFE submitted a no
shipment sales certification and
requested prompt rescission of the
review with respect to JFE. On
December 5, 2005, Nippon responded
that it had no sales of subject
merchandise to or in the United States
during the period of review. On
December 5, 2005, NKK submitted a no
shipment certification and requested
expeditious rescission of the review
with respect to NKK. Also on December
5, 2005, SMI responded that it did not
have any U.S. sales or shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
The Department issued several
supplemental questionnaires, and
received a response by Nippon on
March 13, 2006, and responses by SMI
on March 14, April 25, May 2, May 24,
June 6 and June 9, 2006, providing
further explanation and documentation
concerning their claims of no shipments
during the POR.
On April 26, 2006, the Department
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this antidumping
duty administrative review until June
19, 2006. See Oil Country Tubular
Goods from Japan: Notice of Extension
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 24640 (April 26, 2006).
Period of Review
This review covers the period August
1, 2004, through July 31, 2005.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order consists of oil country tubular
goods, hollow steel products of circular
cross-section, including oil well casing,
tubing, and drill pipe, of iron (other
than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and
alloy), whether seamless or welded,
whether or not conforming to American
Petroleum Institute (API) or non–API
specifications, whether finished or
unfinished (including green tubes and
limited service OCTG products). This
scope does not cover casing, tubing, or
drill pipe containing 10.5 percent or
more of chromium. The products
subject to this order are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7304.21.30.00,
7304.21.60.30, 7304.21.60.45,
7304.21.60.60, 7304.29.10.10,
7304.29.10.20, 7304.29.10.30,
7304.29.10.40, 7304.29.10.50,
7304.29.10.60, 7304.29.10.80,
7304.29.20.10, 7304.29.20.20,
7304.29.20.30, 7304.29.20.40,
PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
7304.29.20.50, 7304.29.20.60,
7304.29.20.80, 7304.29.30.10,
7304.29.30.20, 7304.29.30.30,
7304.29.30.40, 7304.29.30.50,
7304.29.30.60, 7304.29.30.80,
7304.29.40.10, 7304.29.40.20,
7304.29.40.30, 7304.29.40.40,
7304.29.40.50, 7304.29.40.60,
7304.29.40.80, 7304.29.50.15,
7304.29.50.30, 7304.29.50.45,
7304.29.50.60, 7304.29.50.75,
7304.29.60.15, 7304.29.60.30,
7304.29.60.45, 7304.29.60.60,
7304.29.60.75, 7305.20.20.00,
7305.20.40.00, 7305.20.60.00,
7305.20.80.00, 7306.20.10.30,
7306.20.10.90, 7306.20.20.00,
7306.20.30.00, 7306.20.40.00,
7306.20.60.10, 7306.20.60.50,
7306.20.80.10, and 7306.20.80.50.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Analysis
Intent to Rescind the Administrative
Review
In response to our questionnaire, all
four respondents submitted certified
statements claiming no U.S. sales or
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. The petitioner did not
comment on the claims. In order to
corroborate the no–shipment
statements, the Department requested
information from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). Such
information showed no entries of
subject merchandise produced by JFE
and NKK during the POR. Nippon and
SMI had entries but based on our
analysis of the supporting
documentation, we find that these two
companies had no reviewable sales of
subject merchandise. Since much of the
information and documentation
submitted by Nippon and SMI to
demonstrate the circumstances of each
of their entries is business proprietary,
a complete analysis of the Department’s
determination that none of Nippon and
SMI’s entries constitute reviewable sales
during the POR is set forth in the
memorandum from Jun Jack Zhao to
Barbara E. Tillman through Dana
Mermelstein, Analysis Memorandum
regarding the Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Japan (A–
588–835), dated June 19, 2006.
Therefore, in accordance with section
351.213(d)(3) of the Department’s
regulations, we intend to rescind the
administrative review of all four
respondents.
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Notices
Duty Assessment
The Department will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries, pursuant to 19
CFR § 351.212(b). If we determine in the
final results that this review should be
rescinded with respect to JFE, NKK,
Nippon and SMI because these
companies had no sales of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR, we will direct CBP to liquidate
all entries of subject merchandise
manufactured by these four companies,
and entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption during the
POR, at the ‘‘all others’’ rate, 44.20
percent, as all such sales were made by
intermediary companies (e.g., resellers)
not covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less than fair value
(LTFV) investigation. See Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit rates will
be effective with respect to all
shipments of OCTG from Japan entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results, as provided for
by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) For
all four companies, JFE, NKK, Nippon
and SMI, the cash deposit rate will
remain unchanged and will be the
company–specific rate established for
the most recent period; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will be the company–
specific rate established for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the LTFV investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the subject merchandise; and (4) if
neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered by this
review, a prior review, or the LTFV
investigation, the cash deposit rate shall
be the all others rate established in the
LTFV investigation, which is 44.20
percent. See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Japan, 60 FR 155 (August 11, 1995).
These deposit rates, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
administrative review.
Public Comment
Pursuant to section 351.309 of the
Department’s regulations, interested
VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:08 Jun 21, 2006 Jkt 208001
parties may submit written comments in
response to this notice of intent to
rescind the administrative review.
Unless the deadline is extended by the
Department, case briefs are to be
submitted within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice, and
rebuttal briefs, limited to arguments
raised in case briefs, are to be submitted
no later than five days after the time
limit for filing case briefs. Parties who
submit arguments in this proceeding are
requested to submit with the argument:
(1) A statement of the issues, and (2) a
brief summary of the argument. Case
and rebuttal briefs must be served on
interested parties in accordance with
section 351.303(f) of the Department’s
regulations.
Also, pursuant to section 351.310(c)
of the Department’s regulations, within
30 days of the date of publication of this
notice, interested parties may request a
public hearing on arguments to be
raised in the case and rebuttal briefs.
Unless the Department specifies
otherwise, the hearing, if requested, will
be held two days after the date for
submission of rebuttal briefs. Parties
will be notified of the time and location.
The Department will publish the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any case or rebuttal
brief, no later than 120 days after
publication of these preliminary results,
unless extended. See 19 CFR section
351.213(h).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under section 351.402(f)
of the Department’s regulations to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: June 15, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–9880 Filed 6–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
35867
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–838]
Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain
Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 10, 2006, the
Department of Commerce published a
notice of initiation of changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
softwood lumber products from Canada
to determine the correct deposit rate for
Ivis Partners Ltd. (IVIS). We have
preliminarily determined that IVIS is
the successor–in-interest to Ivis Wood
Products Ltd. (Ivis Wood) and should,
therefore, receive Ivis Wood’s cash
deposit rate.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constance Handley or David Layton,
AD/CVD Enforcement, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0631 or (202) 482–
0371, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 16, 2006, in accordance
with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.216(b) (2004), IVIS, a Canadian
producer of softwood lumber products
and interested party in this proceeding,
filed a request for a changed
circumstances review. In response to
this request, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated a
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
softwood lumber from Canada. See
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain
Softwood Products from Canada, 71 FR
18072 (Arpil 10, 2006) (Initiation
Notice). On April 4, 2006, the
Department issued a questionnaire to
IVIS requesting further details on its
purchase of Ivis Woods. IVIS’ response
was received by the Department on
April 13, 2006. On May 10, 2006, the
Department issued an additional
supplemental questionnaire to IVIS.
IVIS’ response was received on May 17,
2006. The petitioner, the Coalition of
Fair Lumber Imports Executive
Commission, did not file comments
with respect to the request.
22JNN1