Notice: Grants and Cooperative Agreements Availability, Etc.: Special Education and Rehabilitative Services&#8212

Friday,
June 2, 2006
Part II
Department of
Education
Grants and Cooperative Agreements—
Notice of Final Priorities and Notices of
Funding Availability; Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_2
VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:05 Jun 01, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02JNN2.SGM 02JNN2
32196 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 106 / Friday, June 2, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION • Rehabilitation of Children with with Disabilities, and Model Systems
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) (a DRRP, Knowledge Translation Center
National Institute on Disability and designated as Priority 4 in the NPP). (MSKTC); and the three RERC priorities
Rehabilitation Research—Disability • Reducing Obesity and Obesity- (i.e., the RERC for Technologies for
and Rehabilitation Research Projects Related Secondary Conditions in Successful Aging, the RERC for
and Centers Program; Funding Adolescents and Adults with Disabilities Wheelchair Transportation Safety, and
Priorities (a DRRP, designated as Priority 5 in the the RERC for Wireless Technologies).
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and NPP). We fully explain these changes in the
• Model Systems Knowledge Analysis of Comments and Changes
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Translation Center (MSKTC) (a DRRP, section that follows.
Education.
designated as Priority 6 in the NPP).
ACTION: Notice of final priorities. • Assistive Technology (AT) Analysis of Comments and Changes
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Outcomes Research Project (a DRRP, In response to our invitation in the
Special Education and Rehabilitative designated as Priority 7 in the NPP). NPP, 51 parties submitted comments on
Services announces certain final • Mobility Aids and Wayfinding the proposed priorities addressed in this
priorities for the Disability and Technologies for Individuals With NFP.
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Blindness and Low Vision (a DRRP, An analysis of the comments and the
Centers Program administered by the designated as Priority 8 in the NPP). changes in the priorities since
National Institute on Disability and • Improving Employment Outcomes publication of the NPP follows. We
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). for the Low Functioning Deaf (LFD) discuss major issues according to
Specifically, this notice announces six Population (a DRRP, designated as general topic questions and priorities.
priorities for Disability Rehabilitation Priority 9 in the NPP). Generally, we do not address
Research Projects (DRRPs); one priority • RRTC on Effective Independent and technical and other minor changes—and
for a Rehabilitation Research and Community Living Solutions and suggested changes the law does not
Training Center (RRTC); and three Measures (designated as Priority 12 in authorize us to make under the
priorities for Rehabilitation Engineering the NPP). applicable statutory authority.
Research Centers (RERCs). The Assistant • RERC for Technologies for
Successful Aging (designated as Priority Scope of Work
Secretary may use these priorities for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2006 13 in the NPP). General
and later years. We take this action to • RERC for Wheelchair
Transportation Safety (designated as Comment: Several commenters asked
focus research attention on areas of whether NIDRR intends to support an
national need. We intend these Priority 14 in the NPP).
• RERC for Wireless Technologies RRTC that is designed to address the
priorities to improve rehabilitation rehabilitation needs of persons who are
(designated as Priority 15 in the NPP).
services and outcomes for individuals deaf or hard of hearing or who are blind
We published the following three
with disabilities. or vision impaired.
priorities in a separate notice of final
DATES: Effective Date: These priorities priorities in the Federal Register on Discussion: At this time, NIDRR does
are effective July 3, 2006. April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25472): not have plans to propose priorities for
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: • General DRRP Requirements FY 2006 for any RRTCs other than the
Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of (designated as Priority 1 in the NPP). RRTC on Effective Independent and
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., • National Data and Statistical Community Living Solutions.
room 6030, Potomac Center Plaza, Center for the Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Changes: None.
Washington, DC 20202–2700. Model Systems (a DRRP, designated as Comment: Several commenters asked
Telephone: (202) 245–7462 or via Priority 2 in the NPP). whether NIDRR plans to use the DRRP
Internet: donna.nangle@ed.gov. • National Data and Statistical mechanism as a substitute for the RRTC
If you use a telecommunications Center for the Traumatic Brain Injury program mechanism to support certain
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call (TBI) Model Systems (a DRRP, projects that have been supported under
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1– designated as Priority 3 in the NPP). the RRTC program in the past (e.g.,
800–877–8339. Because of the volume of comments rehabilitation research and training on
Individuals with disabilities may received in response to the NPP, NIDRR deafness and hard of hearing).
obtain this document in an alternative intends to publish a separate notice of Discussion: Both the DRRP and RRTC
format (e.g., Braille, large print, final priorities for the remaining two program mechanisms have unique,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on priorities proposed in the NPP (i.e., the valued features. In general, the DRRP
request to the contact person listed Disability Business Technical program is more flexible than the RRTC
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Assistance Centers priorities designated program because DRRPs may include
CONTACT. as Priorities 10 and 11 in the NPP). research, demonstration projects,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: More information on these other training, and related activities that help
We published a notice of proposed priorities and the projects and programs maximize the full inclusion and
priorities (NPP) for NIDRR’s Disability that NIDRR intends to fund in FY 2006 integration of individuals with
and Rehabilitation Research Projects can be found on the Internet at: http:// disabilities into society and improve the
and Centers Program in the Federal www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/nidrr/ effectiveness of services authorized
Register on February 7, 2006 (71 FR priority-matrix.html. under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
6318). The NPP included a background This NFP contains several changes amended. In contrast, RRTCs must carry
statement that described our rationale from the NPP. Specifically, we have out advanced programs of research,
for each priority proposed in that notice. made changes to the DRRP priorities for conduct training activities, and conduct
This notice of final priorities (NFP) Rehabilitation of Children with technical assistance. NIDRR believes
addresses 10 of the 15 priorities Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Reducing that, because of the added flexibility
proposed in the NPP. The priorities Obesity and Obesity-Related Secondary that the DRRP mechanism offers, in
addressed in this NFP are as follows: Conditions in Adolescents and Adults some instances it is appropriate to use
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 106 / Friday, June 2, 2006 / Notices 32197
it to support research, training, and Comment: One commenter suggested projects with proposals that reflect
related activities that previously have that the priority should require the consumer interests.
been supported through the RRTC development of mechanisms that would Discussion: NIDRR agrees with this
program mechanism. facilitate collaboration between multiple comment. Under its General DRRP
Changes: None. institutions as they work to understand Requirements priority (designated as
Comment: Several commenters and demonstrate the effects of specific Priority 1 in the NPP and published in
expressed concern that NIDRR did not interventions on children with TBI. The the notice of final priorities in the
include information in the proposed commenters suggested the following as Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71
priorities about the resources available examples of mechanisms that would FR 25472)), each applicant must involve
for the projects to be funded, such as facilitate this type of collaboration: data individuals with disabilities in planning
level of funding and project duration. infrastructures with multi-institutional and implementing the DRRP’s research,
Discussion: These details are not access, and universal flexible tools that training, and dissemination activities,
subject to public comment and, can be used to develop multi-site and evaluating its work. As stated in the
therefore, are not included in the NPP. collaborations. NPP, NIDRR intends to pair the General
We will include information about Discussion: NIDRR recognizes the DRRP Requirements priority with each
available resources in any notice value of multi-site interventions of the DRRP priorities proposed in the
inviting applications that NIDRR research, particularly in light of the NPP. Accordingly, applicants for
publishes for projects that it intends to need for sample sizes that are large funding under this priority will be
fund using these priorities. enough to allow for adequate required to meet the requirements in the
Changes: None. assessment of outcomes. Nothing in the General DRRP Requirements priority as
priority precludes an applicant from well. The requirement regarding the
Rehabilitation of Children with proposing multi-site interventions involvement of individuals with
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) (a DRRP, research or the development of the disabilities in the planning and
designated as Priority 4 in the NPP). mechanisms necessary for this type of implementation activities of a DRRP’s
Two parties submitted comments on research. The peer review process will work is intended to ensure that all
the proposed DRRP priority on evaluate the merits of each proposal. DRRP priorities consider consumer
Rehabilitation of Children with Changes: None. perspectives.
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). One party Reducing Obesity and Obesity-Related Changes: None.
provided substantive comments that Model Systems Knowledge
Secondary Conditions in Adolescents
require discussion in this NFP, while Translation Center (MSKTC) (a DRRP,
and Adults with Disabilities (a DRRP,
the other provided general positive designated as Priority 6 in the NPP).
designated as Priority 5 in the NPP). One party submitted several
feedback on the priority. Four parties submitted comments on comments on the proposed DRRP
Comment: One commenter suggested the proposed DRRP priority for priority for the Model Systems
that this priority should foster the Reducing Obesity and Obesity-Related Knowledge Translation Center (MSKTC).
development and validation of Secondary Conditions in Adolescents Some of these comments focused on the
discipline specific outcome measures and Adults with Disabilities. Two Background statement for this priority
across the pediatric age spectrum so that parties provided substantive comments and do not require discussion in this
the functional consequences of tested that require discussion in this NFP, NFP. We have responded to one
interventions can be accurately while the other two commenters comment regarding the Background
assessed. provided general positive feedback on statement, however, in an effort to
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that well- the priority. clarify NIDRR’s intent for this priority.
validated outcome measures capable of Comment: One commenter suggested Comment: The commenter expressed
assessing change across the pediatric that requiring projects to focus their concern that the Background statement
age spectrum are critical. Without these research on obesity in either the included in the NPP for the MSKTC
measures, documentation of the adolescent population or the adult priority implied that the MSKTC will be
functional consequences of population, rather than on both, may responsible for disseminating materials
rehabilitation interventions and improve the likelihood that a research produced from non-Model Systems
transition strategies would be limited. project will achieve its stated outcomes Program research on SCI, TBI, and burn
With this priority, NIDRR is under the priority. injury rehabilitation.
encouraging applicants to develop or Discussion: NIDRR agrees that an Discussion: The MSKTC will only be
test innovative approaches to treating applicant may limit its research project responsible for improving knowledge
children with TBI. This focus on to focus only on obesity in the translation (KT) of research conducted
treatment supports an emphasis on adolescent population or only on within the three specified Model
interventions research; however, in obesity in the adult population. We Systems Programs. Accordingly, the
recognition of the important role of have revised the priority to clarify that MSKTC will only be responsible for
assessment in the measurement of an applicant may focus its research on disseminating materials produced by
treatment effectiveness, the priority has one or both populations. The peer the three Model Systems Programs
been changed to include development of review process will evaluate the merits specified in the priority.
outcome measures that may be used to of each proposal. Changes: None.
assess the effectiveness of supported Changes: We have revised this Comment: None.
interventions and transition strategies. priority to clarify that applicants can Discussion: NIDRR has recently
Changes: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the focus their research and proposed funded several projects that promote the
priority have been changed to provide activities on obesity either in the KT objectives described in NIDRR’s
for the development or testing of adolescent population or the adult Long Range Plan. NIDRR expects that
outcome measures necessary to assess population, or on obesity in both the the MSKTC will collaborate with these
the effectiveness of rehabilitation adolescent and adult populations. and future NIDRR-funded projects to
interventions and transition strategies Comment: One commenter strongly address KT issues of mutual interest.
for children with TBI. recommended that the Department fund This collaboration may include the
MSKTC’s participation in the KT task and the relevance of findings to the assessment providers may be eligible for
forces of NIDRR’s National Center for various stakeholders, including funding under this priority if it supports
the Dissemination of Disability Research consumers, practitioners, and the outcomes that NIDRR delineated in
or other NIDRR-funded KT projects so researchers is available to users. It is up the priority. While NIDRR does not
that the centers can share information to applicants to propose ways in which believe that it is appropriate to require
about the current progress being made standards related to these objectives all applicants to propose this type of
in the development of standards, might be identified, developed, or program, nothing in the priority
research syntheses, and evidence in applied. The peer review process will precludes an applicant from doing so.
disability and rehabilitation research. evaluate the merits of the proposals. The peer review process will evaluate
The MSKTC also likely will be involved Changes: None. the merits of each proposal.
in sharing KT techniques for capacity Comment: The commenter requested Changes: None.
building among researchers in Model clarification on how NIDRR intends for Comment: One commenter suggested
Systems projects and for informing the MSKTC to bridge gaps between that this priority should include an
stakeholder organizations and research and evidence-based practice. additional outcome that focuses on the
individuals with disabilities about Specifically, the commenter need for a unified framework for
quality research. The MSKTC may be expressed concern about whether it is describing the impact of AT across
funded as a cooperative agreement in useful for the MSKTC to provide populations and environments.
order to facilitate these and similar standards and methods for research Discussion: While NIDRR agrees that
roles. syntheses to the Model Systems a unified framework for describing the
Changes: Paragraph (b) of this priority Programs since the Model Systems impact of AT across populations and
has been changed to clarify that the Programs conduct research, not research environments should be a goal for the
MSKTC must develop partnerships and syntheses. The commenter added that AT field, the development of this type
collaborate with other NIDRR-funded requiring the MSKTC to provide of framework is beyond the scope of this
projects in order to achieve the outcome information on evidence grading would priority. That said, nothing in the
of enhanced knowledge of advances in be beneficial in improving research priority precludes an applicant from
SCI, TBI and Burn Injury research. design, implementing research, and proposing to work toward the
Comment: The commenter asked reporting findings. development of this type of a
whether NIDRR intends for the MSKTC Discussion: NIDRR applauds the framework. The peer review process
to conduct syntheses of research in the commenter for providing an excellent will evaluate the merits of each
fields of TBI, SCI, and Burn Injury summary of the purposes of the MSKTC. proposal.
research. The commenter pointed out We would add that making research Changes: None.
that conducting these types of syntheses findings relevant to the various target Comment: One commenter suggested
would require assessments of material populations is another goal of the that this priority should highlight the
produced outside the Model Systems MSKTC. While providing information importance of outcomes associated with
Programs, and would likely be beyond on grading evidence may be an integral AT to support cognitive function.
the scope of the MSKTC. part of making research relevant, other Discussion: NIDRR agrees that AT to
Discussion: To meet this priority, strategies, including providing support cognitive function might be an
applicants must contribute to an information on research syntheses, also excellent subject for further
enhanced understanding of the quality may be relevant. NIDRR does not development for projects funded under
and relevance of the Model Systems believe that it is appropriate to require this priority. However, NIDRR does not
Programs’ research on SCI, TBI and all applicants to agree to provide believe that all applicants should be
Burn Injury by identifying and applying information on evidence grading required to focus their proposed
appropriate standards and methods for methodologies to the Model Systems research on this specific type of AT.
conducting research synthesis. Programs. That said, nothing in the Nothing in the priority, however,
Applicants, therefore, may choose to priority prohibits an applicant from precludes an applicant from proposing
identify standards or methods that proposing to provide Model Systems to focus its research on AT to support
assess research produced outside the Programs with this information. The cognitive function. The peer review
Model Systems Programs if an peer review process will determine the process will evaluate the merits of each
assessment of this research helps merits of each proposal. proposal.
evaluate the quality and relevance of the Changes: None. Changes: None.
Model Systems Programs’ research on Assistive Technology (AT) Outcomes Mobility Aids and Wayfinding
SCI, TBI, and Burn Injury. NIDRR Research Project (a DRRP, designated as Technologies for Individuals With
expects the MSKTC to provide guidance Priority 7 in the NPP). Blindness and Low Vision (a DRRP,
to Model Systems researchers on Nine parties submitted comments on designated as Priority 8 in the NPP).
standards and methods for conducting the proposed DRRP priority for the Four parties submitted comments on
research and reporting findings to Assistive Technology (AT) Outcomes the proposed DRRP priority on Mobility
enhance the likelihood that Model Research Project. Three parties provided Aids and Wayfinding Technologies for
Systems research is useful to numerous substantive comments that require Individuals With Blindness and Low
stakeholders, including practitioners discussion in this NFP, while the Vision.
and individuals with TBI, SCI, and Burn remainder of the commenters provided Comment: Two commenters
Injury. NIDRR is particularly interested general positive feedback on the expressed concern that the Background
in ensuring that any information to be priority. statement for this priority reflects a lack
disseminated by the Model Systems Comment: One commenter suggested of understanding about the relationship
centers meets the highest possible that projects that develop a program to between ‘‘wayfinding technologies’’ and
standards of quality, and is based on certify AT assessment providers should ‘‘conventional approaches’’ to dealing
scientifically rigorous research. NIDRR be eligible for funding under this with navigation and travel-related
also intends to ensure that, to the extent priority. challenges facing individuals with
possible, any information needed to Discussion: A project that proposes to blindness and low vision. Additionally,
assess the quality of research findings develop a certification program for AT the commenters suggested that, in the
implementation of the priority, NIDRR may ultimately result in the the Low Functioning Deaf (LFD)
should require grantees to recognize that development of solutions that will Population.
mobility skills, whether practiced address the unique mobility challenges Comment: Several commenters
through proper cane technique or use of facing the deaf-blind population. requested information on whether
a guide dog, are essential to safe travel Changes: None. NIDRR intends to develop a separate
and that new technology may Comment: One commenter priority that will focus on the needs of
complement but not replace mobility encouraged the Department to support a the 29 million persons identified as
skills training. project that examines the wide range of deaf, hard of hearing, late deafened, and
Discussion: In developing this technologies addressing navigation and language deprived.
priority, NIDRR considered existing travel-related needs of individuals with Discussion: NIDRR and the
literature and reports related to blindness and low vision that are Department’s Rehabilitation Services
wayfinding technologies, intervention currently being implemented and Administration (RSA) have supported
strategies, and related issues; as well as developed in other countries. The research activities that target the broader
the current state of the science in the commenter also suggested that, under population of persons with hearing loss
areas of wayfinding technologies, this priority, wayfinding technologies for more than 40 years. Although NIDRR
intervention strategies, and orientation should be examined in a variety of is sensitive to the continuing
and mobility techniques for navigation different pedestrian environments. rehabilitation needs of members of this
and travel problems facing individuals Discussion: NIDRR agrees that studies broader population, we have
with blindness and low vision. examining the wide range of determined that there is a need for
Following our review of these materials technologies that are currently being research that focuses on the special
and research findings, we identified a implemented and developed needs of the sub-population of low
range of critical issues surrounding worldwide, including examination of functioning deaf. At this time, NIDRR
wayfinding technologies and wayfinding technologies in a variety of does not intend to develop a separate
intervention strategies, including lack of different pedestrian environments, may priority that focuses on the broader
consensus about terminology and be beneficial. The priority does not population of persons with hearing loss
effectiveness of specific intervention preclude an applicant from proposing for FY 2006.
strategies. The priority was developed an international focus, or an Changes: None.
with these issues in mind. Specifically, examination of wayfinding technologies Comment: One commenter would like
the priority was developed because of in different pedestrian environments. to see additional research focusing on
the need for further research regarding However, NIDRR does not believe that employment opportunities for working
the effectiveness of wayfinding it is appropriate to require all applicants age persons with deaf-blindness and
technologies and orientation and to focus their research on one or both of also, additional research related to
mobility techniques for independent these areas. The peer reviewers will employment issues and deafness.
travel of blind and visually impaired assess the merits of research proposals Discussion: While NIDRR recognizes
consumers. There are many questions submitted. the importance of studies examining
and positions regarding essential Changes: None. employment issues and deafness, and
mobility skills for safe travel. However, Comment: One commenter stressed the needs of working age persons with
there is no basis for requiring that all the importance of including individuals deaf-blindness, the population of
applicants adopt a specific theory, with visual impairments and their individuals who are LFD is the target
philosophy, orientation or principle representatives in the planning and population for this priority. Research
regarding independent travel skills, research activities of the projects funded literature addressing the LFD
techniques, or intervention strategies. under this priority. population is limited. Moreover,
The peer review process will evaluate Discussion: NIDRR agrees with this NIDRR’s own research portfolio
the merits of the proposals. comment. Under its General DRRP currently does not include research that
Changes: None. Requirements priority (designated as focuses on the LFD population. In
Comment: One commenter requested Priority 1 in the NPP and published in contrast, NIDRR currently supports
that this priority be expanded to address the notice of final priorities in the research on the employment of
the mobility and wayfinding technology Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71 individuals with blindness and
needs of deaf-blind individuals. FR 25472)), each applicant must involve deafness, as well as a major study of
Discussion: NIDRR intends for this individuals with disabilities in planning blindness, deafness, and aging.
priority to specifically address the and implementing the DRRP’s research, Therefore, we believe that research
development of wayfinding training, and dissemination activities, targeting the LFD population will
technologies for the blind and visually and evaluating its work. As stated in the address a gap in current research,
impaired population. In order to be NPP, NIDRR intends to pair the General including NIDRR’s own research
eligible for funding under this priority, DRRP Requirements priority with each portfolio; enhance our understanding
applicants must propose activities of the DRRP priorities proposed in the about individuals who are deaf; and
focused on the areas of research NPP. Accordingly, applicants for assist to improve outcomes for the LFD
specified in the priority. However, funding under this priority will be population.
NIDRR believes that within the broad required to meet the requirements in the Changes: None.
areas of research outlined in the General DRRP Requirements priority as RRTC on Effective Independent and
priority, an applicant could propose to well. Community Living Solutions and
conduct research that addresses the Changes: None. Measures (designated as Priority 12 in
needs of the deaf-blind population, Improving Employment Outcomes for the NPP).
particularly as a subpopulation of the the Low Functioning Deaf (LFD) Three parties submitted comments on
blind and visually impaired population. Population (a DRRP, designated as the proposed priority for an RRTC on
NIDRR believes that it also would be Priority 9 in the NPP). Effective Independent and Community
appropriate for applicants to propose Nine parties submitted comments on Living Solutions and Measures.
research that demonstrates how the proposed DRRP priority on Comment: One commenter suggested
advances in wayfinding technologies Improving Employment Outcomes for that this priority may not be supportable
under the statutory language authorizing that problems faced by persons with will maximize the availability of high
research grants for RRTCs. The disabilities are multi-faceted and that quality community-based practices,
commenter suggested that the priority’s the process of knowledge translation programs, and services for individuals
focus on participation by individuals at and capacity building could be with disabilities. Successful
home, in the community, or in supported by cooperative ventures. implementation of the Olmstead
educational or workplace activities was Discussion: We agree that outcomes decision requires that we understand
at odds with a requirement that RRTCs for individuals with disabilities can be and alleviate barriers to community
focus exclusively on the ability of enhanced through coordination among living and that we maximize resources
individuals with disabilities to prepare NIDRR grantees. All NIDRR RRTCs must that facilitate community living. NIDRR
for, secure, retain, regain, or advance in carry out coordinated advanced believes that a broad array of research
employment. programs of rehabilitation research. As questions relating to the implementation
Discussion: NIDRR does not agree that with other NIDRR grants, the NIDRR of the Olmstead decision, including
RRTCs are required to focus exclusively project officer for the grantee supported those areas proposed by the commenter,
on the ability of individuals with under this priority will work with the may be proposed under this priority.
disabilities to prepare for, secure, retain, grantee to facilitate appropriate The peer review process will evaluate
regain, or advance in employment or coordination with other NIDRR- the merits of each proposal.
that the priority is inconsistent with the supported RRTCs. Changes: None.
RRTC regulatory or statutory authority. Changes: None. Rehabilitation Engineering Research
Nothing in section 204 of the Comment: One commenter suggested Centers (RERCs) (designated as
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, that this priority should require grantees Priorities 13, 14 and 15 in the NPP).
requires RRTC research grants to focus to develop concise and sensitive Nine parties submitted comments on
exclusively on the ability of individuals measures of accessibility for different the three proposed priorities for RERCs.
with disabilities to prepare for, secure, types of impairment-related needs. In General
retain, regain, or advance in addition, the commenter identified a Comment: One commenter suggested
employment. Moreover, the purpose of need for the development of sampling that rather than requiring RERC grantees
RRTCs, as stated in the Department’s frames and statistical criteria for to develop plans to involve individuals
regulations, is to (a) develop methods, determining sample size. The with disabilities in their projects after
procedures, and rehabilitation commenter also suggested that grantees they receive an award (i.e., within the
technology, that maximize the full should be required to develop and first three months of the project period),
inclusion and integration into society, assess sources of indicators for it makes more sense to require all
employment, and independent living, environmental barriers to full applicants to include these plans in
family support, and economic and participation. their proposals. In this way, the plans
social self-sufficiency of individuals Discussion: NIDRR agrees that it is would be peer reviewed as part of the
with disabilities, especially individuals important to develop measures of application review process.
with the most severe disabilities; and (b) accessibility for different types of Discussion: NIDRR agrees that all
improve the effectiveness of services impairment-related needs, along with RERC applicants should be required to
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act sample frames and statistical criteria for include their plans to involve
of 1973, as amended (see 34 CFR 350.2 determining sample size. Through our individuals with disabilities in their
and 350.20). RRTCs conduct research portfolio, we already support proposals.
coordinated and integrated advanced work in this area. That said, nothing in Changes: The RERC requirement
programs of research targeted toward this RRTC priority prohibits applicants pertaining to plans for involving
the production of new knowledge to from proposing the specific research individuals with disabilities or their
improve rehabilitation methodology and activities suggested by the commenter. representatives in all phases of the
service delivery systems, alleviate or The peer review process will evaluate RERC’s activities that applicants under
stabilize disability conditions, or the merits of each proposal. each priority must address has been
promote maximum social and economic Changes: None. revised to require applicants to include
independence for persons with Comment: One commenter requested their plans to involve people with
disabilities (see 34 CFR 350.22(a)). The clarification on whether paragraph (b) of disabilities in their proposals.
emphasis of this priority is to enhance this priority requires research projects to Comment: One commenter suggested
community living and participation in focus solely on the implementation of that all RERC applicants should be
accordance with NIDRR’s mission and the Olmstead v. L.C. (527 U.S. 581) required to include plans to disseminate
its Long Range Plan. As reflected in decision, or if the priority allows for the their research results in their proposal,
NIDRR’s overall portfolio of grants, we evaluation of other aspects of the as opposed to being required to develop
recognize the central role of Olmstead decision as well. The these plans after receiving an award.
employment for many individuals with commenter identified a number of Discussion: NIDRR agrees that all
disabilities. Nothing in this priority potential research areas that go beyond RERC applicants should include plans
prohibits applicants from proposing the implementation of Olmstead, such to disseminate their research results in
research activities that address as examination of the principles and their proposals. These dissemination
employment issues. The peer review philosophy of the decision as it applies plans will be evaluated by the peer
process will evaluate the merits of each to individuals with disabilities in review panel using the Department’s
proposal. different contexts, or examination of Design of dissemination activities
Changes: None. how the principles and philosophy of selection criteria in 34 CFR 350.54(g).
Comment: One commenter suggested the decision have affected other cross Changes: The RERC requirement
that NIDRR should require the grantee disability populations in different pertaining to dissemination plans that
under this priority to cooperate with contexts. applicants under each priority must
NIDRR’s RRTC on Employment Policy Discussion: In accordance with address has been revised to require
for Persons with Disabilities and its Executive Order 13217, NIDRR’s applicants to include their plans to
RRTC on Disability Statistics and mission, and its Long Range Plan, we disseminate research results in their
Demographics. The commenter noted are committed to support research that proposals.
Comment: One commenter suggested Changes: None. of universal design and agrees that this
that all RERC applicants should be RERC for Wheelchair Transportation priority should address the importance
required to include their plans to Safety (designated as Priority 14 in the of universal design in product research
transfer developed technologies to the NPP). and development.
marketplace in their proposals, as Comment: Four commenters stated
Changes: We have revised this
opposed to being required to develop that the priority for the RERC for
priority to require grantees to emphasize
these plans after receiving an award. Wheelchair Transportation Safety
the principles of universal design in
Discussion: The RERC priorities needed an additional statement to
their product research and
contain a requirement that each RERC clarify the intent of the priority.
development.
must have the capability to assist in the Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the
transfer of successful solutions to addition of a qualifying statement will Note: This notice does not solicit
relevant production and service delivery help clarify the intent of this priority. applications. In any year in which we choose
settings. The applicant’s response to this The intent of this priority is to improve to use one or more of these priorities, we
requirement in its application will be the safety and independence of invite applications through a notice in the
considered as part of the peer reviewers’ wheelchair users who remain seated in Federal Register. When inviting applications
review of the applicant’s proposed their wheelchairs while using public we designate each priority as absolute,
development activities. NIDRR believes and private transportation services. competitive preference, or invitational. The
that, with this information, the peer Changes: The priority has been effect of each type of priority follows:
reviewers will be able to evaluate revised to emphasize that the focus of
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
whether the applicant has the capability the RERC’s activities on wheeled
priority, we consider only applications that
to transfer developed technologies to the mobility devices and wheelchair seating
meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
marketplace. systems must relate to their use in the Competitive preference priority: Under a
Changes: None. transportation environment. competitive preference priority, we give
RERC for Technologies for Successful Comment: One commenter stated that
competitive preference to an application by
Aging (designated as Priority 13 in the this priority should require applicants either (1) awarding additional points,
NPP). to improve the state of the science, depending on how well or the extent to
Comment: One commenter urged design guidelines and performance which the application meets the competitive
NIDRR to incorporate the principles of standards, and usability of wheelchair preference priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i));
universal design in the priority for the securement and occupant restraint or (2) selecting an application that meets the
RERC for Technologies for Successful systems. competitive preference priority over an
Aging. Discussion: NIDRR agrees that application of comparable merit that does not
Discussion: NIDRR has long improvement in the state of the science, meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
supported and advocated the principles design guidelines and performance Invitational priority: Under an invitational
of universal design and agrees that this standards, and usability of wheelchair priority, we are particularly interested in
priority should address the importance securement and occupant restraint applications that meet the invitational
of universal design in product research systems would be beneficial to persons priority. However, we do not give an
and development. using wheelchairs. Nothing in this application that meets the invitational
Changes: We have revised this priority prohibits an applicant from priority a competitive or absolute preference
priority to require grantees to emphasize proposing activities that improve the over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
the principles of universal design in state of the science, design guidelines
Note: This NFP is in concert with President
their product research and and performance standards, and
George W. Bush’s New Freedom Initiative
development. usability of wheelchair securement and
Comment: One commenter suggested (NFI) and NIDRR’s Final Long-Range Plan for
occupant restraint systems. The peer FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The NFI can be
that this priority should include a focus review process will evaluate the merits accessed on the Internet at the following site:
on assistive technologies for cognition. of each applicant’s proposal. http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that an Changes: None. newfreedom.
RERC funded under this priority may Comment: One commenter stated that
research, develop, and evaluate assistive this priority should address the safe use The Plan, which was published in the
technologies for cognition. An applicant of scooters and large wheelchairs in Federal Register on February 15, 2006
could propose activities that focus on transportation environments. (71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the
assistive technologies for cognition and Discussion: NIDRR agrees that the Internet at the following site: http://
the peer review process will evaluate increased use of scooters and large www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/
the merits of the applicant’s proposal. wheelchairs in the transportation nidrr/policy.html.
Changes: None. environment deserves attention. An
Comment: One commenter stated that applicant could propose activities that Through the implementation of the
this priority should require applicants include research and evaluation of NFI and the Plan, NIDRR seeks to—(1)
to address human-technology interfaces scooter and large wheelchair use in Improve the quality and utility of
or operating controls for persons with transportation environments; the peer disability and rehabilitation research;
vision impairment. review process will evaluate the merits (2) Foster an exchange of expertise,
Discussion: NIDRR agrees that human- of each applicant’s proposal. information, and training to facilitate
technology interfaces are critical for Changes: None. the advancement of knowledge and
device utility. An applicant could RERC for Wireless Technologies understanding of the unique needs of
propose activities that include the (designated as Priority 15 in the NPP). traditionally underserved populations;
research, development, or evaluation of Comment: One commenter urged (3) Determine best strategies and
human-technology interfaces or NIDRR to incorporate the principles of programs to improve rehabilitation
operating controls for persons with universal design in the priority for the outcomes for underserved populations;
vision impairment and the peer review RERC for Wireless Technologies. (4) Identify research gaps; (5) Identify
process will evaluate the merits of the Discussion: NIDRR has long mechanisms of integrating research and
applicant’s proposal. supported and advocated the principles practice; and (6) Disseminate findings.
Priorities effective transition strategies, the consumers, clinicians, and other end
measures needed to assess the users of such information. The MSKTC
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
effectiveness of transition strategies, or must contribute to this outcome by (1)
Projects (DRRP) Program
both. identifying effective strategies for, and
The purpose of the DRRP program is (c) Improved TBI screening and guiding targeted dissemination of, SCI,
to plan and conduct research, special education services for children TBI, and Burn Model Systems Programs’
demonstration projects, training, and by developing or testing methods and findings about available services and
related activities to develop methods, procedures for use in school settings. interventions for individuals with SCI,
procedures, and rehabilitation TBI, and Burn; and (2) developing
Reducing Obesity and Obesity-Related
technology that maximize the full partnerships and collaborating with key
Secondary Conditions in Adolescents
inclusion and integration into society, constituencies, other NIDRR-funded
and Adults With Disabilities
employment, independent living, family projects (e.g., the National Center for the
support, and economic and social self- Priority Dissemination of Disability Research
sufficiency of individuals with The Assistant Secretary for Special and the National Rehabilitation
disabilities, especially individuals with Education and Rehabilitative Services Information Center), and groups
the most severe disabilities, and to establishes a priority for the funding of conducting similar work.
improve the effectiveness of services a Disability Rehabilitation Research (c) Centralization of SCI, TBI, and
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act Project (DRRP) on Disability and Burn Model Systems resources for
of 1973, as amended. DRRPs carry out Obesity: Reducing Obesity and Obesity- effective and uniform dissemination and
one or more of the following types of Related Secondary Conditions in technical assistance. The MSKTC must
activities, as specified and defined in 34 Adolescents and Adults with contribute to this outcome by serving as
CFR 350.13 through 350.19: research, Disabilities. Under this priority, the a centralized resource for the SCI, TBI,
development, demonstration, training, DRRP must be designed to contribute to and Burn Model Systems Centers.
dissemination, utilization, and technical the following outcomes:
assistance. Assistive Technology (AT) Outcomes
(a) Enhanced understanding of the
An applicant for assistance under this Research Project
antecedents and consequences of
program must demonstrate in its obesity as a secondary condition among Priority
application how it will address, in adolescents, adults, or both adolescents
whole or in part, the needs of The Assistant Secretary for Special
and adults with different types of pre-
individuals with disabilities from Education and Rehabilitative Services
existing physical, sensory, cognitive,
minority backgrounds (34 CFR establishes a priority for the funding of
and behavioral-health impairments.
350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant (b) Improved obesity screening and a Disability Rehabilitation Research
may take to meet this requirement are diagnosis among adolescents, adults or Project (DRRP) for an Assistive
found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition, both adolescents and adults with Technology (AT) Outcomes Research
NIDRR intends to require all DRRP different types of disabilities by Project. Under this priority, the DRRP
applicants to meet the requirements of developing or testing effective screening must be designed to contribute to the
the General DRRP Requirements priority and diagnostic methods and procedures. following outcomes:
that it published in a notice of final (c) Improved outcomes for (a) Improvement of the AT field’s
priorities in the Federal Register on adolescents, adults, or both adolescents ability to measure the impact of AT on
April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25472). and adults with disabilities with obesity the lives of people with disabilities by
Additional information on the DRRP by development or testing of prevention continuing to develop AT outcomes
program can be found at: http:// strategies and treatments. measures and measurement systems.
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res- (b) Improvement of the AT field’s
program.html#DRRP. Model Systems Knowledge Translation ability to measure the impact of AT on
Center (MSKTC) the lives of people with disabilities by
Rehabilitation of Children With
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Priority developing validated methods for
The Assistant Secretary for Special measuring and classifying AT
Priority interventions, including key
Education and Rehabilitative Services
The Assistant Secretary for Special establishes a priority for the funding of characteristics of both the AT device
Education and Rehabilitative Services a Disability Rehabilitation Research and AT provision (e.g., setting,
establishes a priority for the funding of Project to serve as the Model Systems assessment, fit/customization, user-
a Disability Rehabilitation Research Knowledge Translation Center training, and device maintenance).
Project (DRRP) on the Rehabilitation of (MSKTC). Under this priority, the (c) Enhanced understanding of the
Children with Traumatic Brain Injury MSKTC must be designed to contribute impact of AT on the lives of people with
(TBI). Under this priority, the DRRP to the following outcomes: disabilities by conducting at least one
must be designed to contribute to the (a) Enhanced understanding of the research project that systematically
following outcomes: quality and relevance of NIDRR’s Spinal applies state-of-the-science measures of
(a) Improved physical, cognitive, Cord Injury (SCI), Traumatic Brain AT interventions, outcomes, and data
social/behavioral, family, educational, Injury (TBI), and Burn Injury (Burn) collections mechanisms.
or employment outcomes for children Model Systems Programs’ findings. The (d) Collaboration with the relevant
with TBI by developing or testing MSKTC must contribute to this outcome NIDRR-sponsored projects, such as the
rehabilitation interventions, the by identifying and applying appropriate Rehabilitation Research Training Center
measures needed to assess the standards and methods for conducting on Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes
effectiveness of rehabilitation research syntheses. This will allow the and relevant projects within the
interventions, or both. Model Systems Programs to bridge gaps Rehabilitation Engineering Research
(b) Improved transition of children in evidence-based practice and research. Center program, as identified through
from health care facilities to school and (b) Enhanced knowledge of advances consultation with the NIDRR project
community by developing or testing in SCI, TBI, and Burn research among officer.
Mobility Aids and Wayfinding Improving Employment Outcomes for • Provide training, including
Technologies for Individuals With the Low Functioning Deaf (LFD) graduate, pre-service, and in-service
Blindness and Low Vision Population training, to help rehabilitation
personnel more effectively provide
Priority Priority
rehabilitation services to individuals
The Assistant Secretary for Special with disabilities;
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
Education and Rehabilitative Services • Provide technical assistance to
establishes a priority for the funding of
establishes a priority for the funding of a Disability Rehabilitation Research individuals with disabilities, their
a Disability Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP) on Improving representatives, providers, and other
Project (DRRP) on Mobility Aids and Employment Outcomes for the Low interested parties;
Wayfinding Technologies for Functioning Deaf (LFD) Population. • Demonstrate in their applications
Individuals With Blindness and Low Under this priority, the DRRP must be how they will address, in whole or in
Vision. To meet this priority, the DRRP designed to contribute to the following part, the needs of individuals with
must be designed to contribute to the outcomes: disabilities from minority backgrounds;
following outcomes: (a) Enhanced knowledge about the • Disseminate informational materials
(a) Effective technology solutions and unique functional and communication to individuals with disabilities, their
intervention approaches that can enable characteristics of the LFD population representatives, providers, and other
blind and low vision individuals to and the extent to which these interested parties; and
characteristics affect disability and
safely and independently navigate their
rehabilitation outcomes, including labor • Serve as centers of national
surroundings. The DRRP must excellence in rehabilitation research for
force participation and employment
contribute to this outcome by individuals with disabilities, their
preparation. The DRRP must contribute
identifying or developing and testing representatives, providers, and other
to this outcome by developing and
methods, models, and measures that testing protocols that accurately interested parties.
will inform the technology solutions measure population characteristics; and Rehabilitation Research and Training
and intervention approaches. psychometrically sound instruments Center (RRTC) on Effective Independent
(b) Improved understanding about the that measure predictors of disability, and Community Living Solutions and
effectiveness of wayfinding technology rehabilitation, and employment Measures
and orientation and mobility (O&M) outcomes.
techniques for navigation and travel (b) Improved employment outcomes Priority
problems. The DRRP must be designed and reduction of barriers to labor force
participation for individuals who are The Assistant Secretary establishes a
to contribute to this outcome by, at a priority for the funding of a
minimum, conducting comparative LFD. The DRRP must contribute to this
outcome by developing theory-based Rehabilitation Research and Training
analysis of outcomes for specific Center (RRTC) on Effective Independent
subpopulations of individuals with intervention strategies and methods that
help to enhance functional skills, social and Community Living Solutions and
blindness and low vision who use O&M Measures. To meet this priority, the
interaction, communication and literacy
techniques and wayfinding technology. RRTC’s research must be designed to
competencies, and scientifically-sound
(c) Increased technical and scientific approaches for identifying barriers to contribute to the following outcomes:
knowledge about the applications of labor force participation. (a) Enhanced participation by
navigation and travel technologies for (c) Collaboration with NIDRR- individuals with disabilities at home, in
individuals with blindness and low sponsored projects, including the the community, or in educational or
vision, leading to more effective use of Rehabilitation Research and Training workplace activities through
technologies and intervention strategies, Center (RRTC) on Measuring development of effective theory-based
through the development of knowledge Rehabilitation Outcomes and other intervention methods and outcome
translation and utilization activities. relevant projects within NIDRR’s RRTC measures.
(d) Coordination of research activities. and Field Initiated programs. (b) Improved intervention approaches
The DRRP must contribute to this Rehabilitation Research and Training and guidelines that help to remove or
outcome by collaborating and Centers (RRTCs) reduce barriers to full community
consulting with relevant Federal integration and participation for
RRTCs conduct coordinated and individuals with disabilities. The RRTC
agencies responsible for the integrated advanced programs of
administration of public laws that must contribute to this outcome by
research targeted toward the production conducting rigorous research examining
address access to and usability of of new knowledge to improve the implementation of the Olmstead v.
transportation and transit-related rehabilitation methodology and service L.C. (527 U.S. 581) decision and
systems and environmental structures delivery systems, alleviate or stabilize practices that serve as facilitators or
for individuals with disabilities, such as disability conditions, or promote barriers to independent and community
the Architectural and Transportation maximum social and economic living.
Barriers Compliance Board, the U.S. independence for persons with
Department of Transportation’s Federal disabilities. Additional information on (c) Improved understanding about the
Highway Administration, Federal the RRTC program can be found at: economic utility of existing or proposed
Transit Administration and National http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/ policies and practices to maximize
pubs/res-program.html#RRTC. independence and participation for

Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
individuals with disabilities through
and relevant NIDRR-funded research General Requirements of RRTCs development of scientifically sound,
projects as identified through
RRTCs must— valid and reliable methods and
consultation with the NIDRR project • Carry out coordinated advanced measures to assess these policies and
officer. programs of rehabilitation research; practices.
Rehabilitation Engineering Research that will improve the lives of persons (5) Increased impact of research in the
Centers Program General Requirements with disabilities. designated priority research area. The
of Rehabilitation Engineering Research (a) RERC for Technologies for RERC must contribute to this outcome
Centers (RERCs) Successful Aging. Under this priority, by providing technical assistance to
RERCs carry out research or the RERC must research, develop and public and private organizations,
demonstration activities in support of evaluate innovative technologies and persons with disabilities, and employers
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as approaches that will improve the on policies, guidelines, and standards
amended, by— quality of life of older persons with related to its designated priority
• Developing and disseminating disabilities and promote health, safety, research area.
innovative methods of applying independence, and active engagement. In addition, under each priority, the
advanced technology, scientific The RERC must emphasize the RERC must—
achievement, and psychological and principles of universal design in its • Have the capability to design, build,
social knowledge to (a) solve product research and development. and test prototype devices and assist in
rehabilitation problems and remove (b) RERC for Wheelchair the transfer of successful solutions to
environmental barriers and (b) study Transportation Safety. Under this relevant production and service delivery
and evaluate new or emerging priority, the RERC must research, settings;
develop, and evaluate innovative • Evaluate the efficacy and safety of
technologies, products, or environments
technologies and strategies that will its new products, instrumentation, or
and their effectiveness and benefits; or
• Demonstrating and disseminating improve the safety and independence of assistive devices;
(a) innovative models for the delivery of wheelchair users who remain seated in • Provide as part of its proposal and
cost-effective rehabilitation technology their wheelchairs while using public then implement a plan that describes
services to rural and urban areas and (b) and private transportation services. The how it will include, as appropriate,
other scientific research to assist in RERC must research and develop individuals with disabilities or their
meeting the employment and innovative technologies and strategies representatives in all phases of its
independent living needs of individuals that will improve the current state of the activities, including research,
with severe disabilities; or science, design guidelines and development, training, dissemination,
• Facilitating service delivery systems performance standards, and usability of and evaluation;
change through (a) the development, wheeled mobility devices and • Provide as part of its proposal and
evaluation, and dissemination of wheelchair seating systems for use in then implement, in consultation with
consumer-responsive and individual the transportation environment. the NIDRR-funded National Center for
and family-centered innovative models (c) RERC for Wireless Technologies. the Dissemination of Disability
for the delivery to both rural and urban Under this priority, the RERC must Research, a plan to disseminate its
areas of innovative cost-effective research, develop, and evaluate research results to persons with
rehabilitation technology services and innovative technologies that facilitate disabilities, their representatives,
(b) other scientific research to assist in equitable access to, and use of, future disability organizations, service
meeting the employment and generations of wireless technologies for providers, professional journals,
independence needs of individuals with individuals with disabilities of all ages. manufacturers, and other interested
severe disabilities. The RERC must emphasize the parties;
Each RERC must provide training • Develop and implement in the first
principles of universal design in its
opportunities, in conjunction with year of the project period, in
product research and development.
institutions of higher education and consultation with the NIDRR-funded
Under each priority, the RERC must
nonprofit organizations, to assist RERC on Technology Transfer, a plan
be designed to contribute to the
individuals, including individuals with for ensuring that all new and improved
following programmatic outcomes:
disabilities, to become rehabilitation technologies developed by the RERC are
(1) Increased technical and scientific successfully transferred to the
technology researchers and knowledge-base relevant to its
practitioners. marketplace;
designated priority research area. • Conduct a state-of-the-science
Additional information on the RERC (2) Innovative technologies, products,
program can be found at: http:// conference on its designated priority
environments, performance guidelines, research area in the third year of the
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/ and monitoring and assessment tools as
index.html. project period and publish a
applicable to its designated priority comprehensive report on the final
Rehabilitation Engineering Research research area. The RERC must outcomes of the conference in the fourth
Centers (RERCs) for Technologies for contribute to this outcome by year of the project period; and
Successful Aging, Wheelchair developing and testing of these • Coordinate research projects of
Transportation Safety, and Wireless innovations. mutual interest with relevant NIDRR-
Technologies (3) Improved research capacity in its funded projects, as identified through
designated priority research area. The consultation with the NIDRR project
Priorities RERC must contribute to this outcome officer.
The Assistant Secretary for Special by collaborating with the relevant
Education and Rehabilitative Services industry, professional associations, and Executive Order 12866
establishes the following three priorities institutions of higher education. This NFP has been reviewed in
for the funding of (a) an RERC for (4) Improved focus on cutting edge accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Technologies for Successful Aging, (b) developments in technologies within its Under the terms of the order, we have
an RERC for Wheelchair Transportation designated priority research area. The assessed the potential costs and benefits
Safety, and (c) an RERC for Wireless RERC must contribute to this outcome of this regulatory action.
Technologies. Within its designated by identifying and communicating with The potential costs associated with
priority research area, each RERC will NIDRR and the field regarding trends this NFP are those resulting from
focus on innovative technological and evolving product concepts related statutory requirements and those we
solutions, new knowledge, and concepts to its designated priority research area. have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively 84.133E Rehabilitation Engineering Research the full inclusion and integration into
and efficiently. Centers Program) society, employment, independent
In assessing the potential costs and Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g), living, family support, and economic
benefits—both quantitative and 764(a), 764(b)(2), and 764(b)(3). and social self-sufficiency of individuals
qualitative—of this NFP, we have Dated: May 23, 2006. with disabilities, especially individuals
determined that the benefits of the final John H. Hager,
with the most severe disabilities, and to
priorities justify the costs. improve the effectiveness of services
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
Summary of Potential Costs and of 1973, as amended. DRRPs carry out
Benefits [FR Doc. 06–4935 Filed 6–1–06; 8:45 am]
one or more of the following types of
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
The potential costs associated with activities, as specified and defined in 34
these final priorities are minimal while CFR 350.13 through 350.19: research,
the benefits are significant. Grantees DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION development, demonstration, training,
may incur some costs associated with dissemination, utilization, and technical
completing the application process in Office of Special Education and assistance.
terms of staff time, copying, and mailing Rehabilitative Services Overview An applicant for assistance under this
or delivery. The use of e-Application Information; National Institute on program must demonstrate in its
technology reduces mailing and copying Disability and Rehabilitation Research application how it will address, in
costs significantly. (NIDRR)—Disability Rehabilitation whole or in part, the needs of
The benefits of the Disability and Research Projects (DRRPs)—Assistive individuals with disabilities from
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Technology (AT) Outcomes Research minority backgrounds (34 CFR
Centers Programs have been well Project; Notice Inviting Applications 350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant
established over the years in that similar for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) may take to meet this requirement are
projects have been completed 2006 found in 34 CFR 350.40(b).
successfully. These final priorities will Additional information on the DRRP
generate new knowledge and Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program can be found at: http://
technologies through research, (CFDA) Number: 84.133A–8. www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-
development, dissemination, utilization, DATES: Applications Available: June 2, program.html#DRRP.
and technical assistance projects. 2006. Priorities: NIDRR has established two
Another benefit of these final Deadline for Transmittal of priorities for this competition. The
priorities is that the establishment of Applications: July 21, 2006. General DRRP Requirements priority is
new DRRPs, a new RRTC, and new Date of Pre-Application Meeting: June from the notice of final priorities for the
RERCs will support the President’s NFI 19, 2006. Disability and Rehabilitation Research
and will improve the lives of persons Eligible Applicants: States; public or Projects and Centers program, published
with disabilities. The new DRRPs, private agencies, including for-profit in the Federal Register on April 28,
RRTC, and RERCs will generate, agencies; public or private 2006 (71 FR 25472). The AT Outcomes
disseminate, and promote the use of organizations, including for-profit Research Project priority is from the
new information that will improve the organizations; institutions of higher notice of final priorities for the
options for individuals with disabilities. education (IHEs); and Indian tribes and Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 tribal organizations. Projects and Centers program, published
CFR part 350. Estimated Available Funds: $450,000. elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Estimated Range of Awards: Register.
Electronic Access to This Document $400,000–$450,000. Absolute Priorities: For FY 2006 these
You may view this document, as well Maximum Award: We will reject any priorities are absolute priorities. Under
as all other Department of Education application that proposes a budget 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
documents published in the Federal exceeding $450,000 for a single budget applications that meet these priorities.
Register, in text or Adobe Portable period of 12 months. The Assistant These priorities are:
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet Secretary for Special Education and General Disability and Rehabilitation
at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ Rehabilitative Services may change the Research Projects (DRRP) Requirements
news/fedregister. maximum amount through a notice and Assistive Technology (AT)
To use PDF you must have Adobe published in the Federal Register. Outcomes Research Project.
Acrobat Reader, which is available free Note: The maximum amount includes Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
at this site. If you have questions about direct and indirect costs. and 764(a).
using PDF, call the U.S. Government Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– Estimated Number of Awards: 1. Education Department General
888–293–6498; or in the Washington, Note: The Department is not bound by any Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
DC, area at (202) 512–1530. estimates in this notice. 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 84,
Note: The official version of this document
85, 86, and 97. (b) The regulations for
Project Period: Up to 36 months. this program in 34 CFR part 350. (c) The
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official Full Text of Announcement notice of final priorities for the
edition of the Federal Register and the Code Disability and Rehabilitation Research
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO I. Funding Opportunity Description Projects and Centers program, published
Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ Purpose of Program: The purpose of in the Federal Register on April 28,
index.html. the DRRP program is to plan and 2006 (71 FR 25472). (d) The notice of
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance conduct research, demonstration final priorities for the Disability and
Numbers 84.133A Disability Rehabilitation projects, training, and related activities Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Research Projects, 84.133B Rehabilitation to develop methods, procedures, and Centers program, published elsewhere
Research and Training Centers Program, and rehabilitation technology that maximize in this issue of the Federal Register.

Notice: Grants and Cooperative Agreements Availability, Etc.: Special Education and Rehabilitative Services&#8212

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notice: Grants and Cooperative Agreements Availability, Etc.: Special Education and Rehabilitative Services&#8212

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Friday,

pubs/res-program.html#RRTC. independence and participation for

You might also like