You are on page 1of 3

27710 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Notices

expiration of the current IHA if a new NMFS FONSI also takes into Dated: May 3, 2006.
IHA is not requested. consideration updated data and Donna Wieting,
(6) If any dead or injured marine information contained in this Federal Deputy Director, Office of Protected
mammals or sea turtles are observed or Register document, the proposed IHA Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
detected prior to testing, or injured or notice (71 FR 3474, January 23, 2006) [FR Doc. 06–4436 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am]
killed during live fire, a report must be and previous notices (70 FR 48675, BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
made to the NMFS by the following August 19, 2005). Therefore, it is not
business day. necessary for NMFS to issue a new EA,
(7) Any unauthorized takes of marine DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
supplemental EA or an environmental
mammals (i.e., injury or mortality) must
be immediately reported to the NMFS impact statement for the issuance of an National Oceanic and Atmospheric
representative and to the respective IHA to Eglin AFB for this activity. A Administration
stranding network representative. copy of Eglin’s PEA and the NMFS
FONSI for this activity is available upon [I.D. 050406C]
ESA request (see ADDRESSES). Endangered and Threatened Species;
Consultation under section 7 of the Take of Anadromous Fish
ESA on Eglin EGTTR activities was Determinations
completed on December 18, 1998. NMFS has determined that the A-S AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Consultation was reinitiated by Eglin gunnery exercises that are conducted by Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AFB with NMFS on February 13, 2003 Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Eglin AFB in the EGTTR in the northern
and concluded on October 20, 2004. A Commerce.
GOM, are unlikely to result in the
NMFS Biological Opinion issued on ACTION: Applications for five scientific
mortality or serious injury of marine
October 20, 2004, concluded that the A- research permits (1564, 1565, 1566,
S gunnery exercises in the EGTTR are mammals (see Table 11) and, would
1567, 1568) and one modification (1335
unlikely to jeopardize the continued result in, at worst, a temporary elevation – modification 4).
existence of species listed under the in hearing sensitivity (known as TTS).
ESA that are within the jurisdiction of Eglin AFB estimates, and NMFS concurs SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
NMFS or destroy or adversely modify that up to 271 marine mammals may NMFS has received six scientific
critical habitat. NMFS has determined incur this form of Level B harassment research permit application requests
that issuance of an IHA to Eglin AFB for annually. Also, these gunnery exercises relating to Pacific salmon. The proposed
this activity will not have effects beyond have the potential to result in a research is intended to increase
what was analyzed in 2004 in the temporary modification in behavior by knowledge of species listed under the
Biological Opinion. marine mammals. Eglin AFB estimates Endangered Species Act (ESA) and to
that up 25 marine mammals may help guide management and
NEPA conservation efforts.
experience a behavioral response to
The U.S. Air Force (USAF) made a these exercises during the time-frame of DATES: Comments or requests for a
Finding of No Significant Impact an IHA. NMFS believes that this number public hearing on the applications must
(FONSI) determination on August 18, may be slightly higher because estimates be received at the appropriate address or
2003, based on information contained fax number (see ADDRESSES) no later
of Level B harassment by peak pressure
within its November, 2002 than 5 p.m. Pacific standard time on
cannot be made at this time. While
Programmatic EA (PEA), that June 12, 2006.
behavioral modifications may be made
implementation of the subject action is ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
by these species as a result of these A-
not a major Federal action having applications should be sent to the
significant effects on the environment S gunnery activities, any behavioral Protected Resources Division, NMFS,
within the meaning of NEPA. The USAF change is expected to result in no more 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100,
determined, therefore, that an than a negligible impact on the affected Portland, OR 97232–1274. Comments
environmental impact statement would species. In addition, the potential for may also be sent via fax to 503–230–
not be prepared. NMFS noted that Eglin temporary hearing impairment is very 5441 or by e-mail to
AFB had prepared a PEA for the EGTTR low and will be mitigated to the lowest resapps.nwr@NOAA.gov.
activity and made this PEA available level practicable through the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
upon request (January 23, 2006, 71 FR incorporation of the mitigation Garth Griffin, Portland, OR (ph.: 503–
3474). In accordance with NOAA measures mentioned in this document. 231–2005, Fax: 503–230–5441, e-mail:
Administrative Order 216–6 Finally, this activity by Eglin AFB Garth.Griffin@noaa.gov). Permit
(Environmental Review Procedures for would not have an unmitigable adverse application instructions are available
Implementing the National impact on the availability of stocks for from the address above.
Environmental Policy Act, May 20, subsistence uses because there are no SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1999), NMFS has reviewed the known subsistence uses of marine
information contained in Eglin AFB’s mammals in the Gulf of Mexico. Species Covered in This Notice
PEA and determined that Eglin AFB’s The following listed species are
PEA accurately and completely Authorization covered in this notice:
describes the proposed action, the NMFS has issued an IHA to Eglin Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
alternatives to the proposed action, and tshawytscha): threatened lower
AFB for conducting A-S gunnery
the potential impacts on marine Columbia River (LCR), threatened upper
exercises within the EGTTR in the
mammals, endangered species, and Willamette River (UWR), threatened
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

other marine life that could be impacted northern GOM for a 1–year period,
Puget Sound (PS), endangered upper
by the preferred alternative and the provided the mitigation, monitoring,
Columbia River (UCR).
other alternatives. Accordingly, NMFS and reporting requirements are Chum salmon (O. keta): threatened
adopted Eglin AFB’s PEA under 40 CFR undertaken. Columbia River (CR), threatened Hood
1506.3 and made its own FONSI. The Canal (HC).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:54 May 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Notices 27711

Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened Permit 1564 Permit 1566


LCR, threatened UWR, threatened UCR, The Northwest Fisheries Science
threatened middle Columbia River The University of Washington, School
of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (UW) is Center (NWFSC) is requesting a 5–year
(MCR). research permit to take juvenile PS
requesting a 5–year research permit to
Coho salmon (O. kisutch): threatened Chinook salmon. The purpose of this
take juvenile PS Chinook salmon. The
LCR, threatened Southern Oregon study is to monitor a number of
objective of the research is to monitor
Northern California Coasts (SONCC). proposed restoration sites along the
the success of habitat restoration
Authority projects in the Duwamish River estuary Puget Sound shoreline from near the
the researchers wish to determine if the Hiram Chittenden Locks north to the
Scientific research permits are issued population characteristics of local town of Everett. The researchers would
in accordance with section 10(a)(1)(A) Chinook salmon have changed determine fish presence, gauge
of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and individual fish health, and measure
(improved) in response to recent
regulations governing listed fish and chemical contamination. The goal is to
estuarine habitat restoration activities.
wildlife permits (50 CFR 222–226). establish a pre-restoration baseline of
The habitat restoration work was
NMFS issues permits based on findings the conditions at each of the proposed
conducted by the Port of Seattle and
that such permits: (1) Are applied for in restoration sites so the researchers can
monitoring has been going on since
good faith; (2) if granted and exercised, determine how effective the restoration
2004 under a separate permit. The UW
would not operate to the disadvantage is. The fish would benefit from ongoing
is now seeking their own permit to
of the listed species that are the subject improvement in the restoration efforts.
continue the study. The habitat
of the permit; and (3) are consistent Sediments would be collected from each
restoration projects were designed to
with the purposes and policy of section site and chemically analyzed. The fish
improve Chinook salmon rearing and
2 of the ESA. The authority to take would be captured in beach seines,
migration habitat, and the research will
listed species is subject to conditions set measured, and sampled for individual
benefit the fish by helping managers
forth in the permits. condition factors and whole body lipid
learn the effectiveness of those
Anyone requesting a hearing on an content. Some of the captured fish
measures. The fish would be captured
application listed in this notice should would be sacrificed during the process,
using enclosure nets and beach seines.
set out the specific reasons why a and a few more fish may die as an
Half of the juvenile Chinook salmon
hearing on that application would be unintended result of the research.
would be counted, checked for external
appropriate (see ADDRESSES). Such marks and internal coded-wire tags, Permit 1567
hearings are held at the discretion of the measured, and released. The other half
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, Ridolfi Inc. is requesting a 5–year
of the captured fish would also have research permit to take juvenile PS
NMFS. their stomachs flushed. The UW does Chinook salmon. The purpose of this
Applications Received not intend to kill any of the fish being study is to monitor habitat restoration
captured but a small number may die as sites in Commencement Bay,
Permit 1335 – Modification 4 an unintended result of the activities. Washington. Data from the research
Permit 1335 currently authorizes the Permit 1565 would be used to measure the success
US Forest Service (USFS) to take of restoration efforts, identify adaptive
juvenile UCR Chinook salmon, UWR The National Park Service, Olympic management approaches, address
Chinook salmon, LCR Chinook salmon, National Park (ONP) is requesting a 5– monitoring requirements specified by
PS Chinook salmon, UCR steelhead, year research permit to take juvenile permitting agencies, and serve as an
UWR steelhead, LCR steelhead, MCR LCR Chinook salmon, juvenile PS outreach tool for disseminating project
steelhead, CR chum salmon, HC chum Chinook salmon, juvenile LCR information to interested parties. The
salmon, and SONCC coho salmon on steelhead, and juvenile LCR coho fish would benefit from ongoing
Federal lands covered by the Northwest salmon. The research activities are part improvement in the restoration actions.
Forest Plan in Oregon and Washington. of the National Park Service Inventory The fish would be captured using block
The USFS is asking to modify their and Monitoring Program and would be nets and beach seines at six restoration
permit so they may be allowed to take conducted within the boundaries of sites throughout Commencement Bay
LCR coho salmon and newly listed Mount Rainier National Park. The long- and its tributaries. The fish would be
hatchery HC chum salmon, LCR term goals for the program are to (1) collected, identified, checked for marks
Chinook salmon, UWR Chinook salmon, monitor ecosystem status and trends; (2) or coded-wire tags, and measured.
and SONCC coho salmon. They also help park managers identify alternative Ridolfi does not intend to kill any of the
wish to extend the permit’s expiration management actions, assess trade-offs, fish being captured, but a small number
date to December 31, 2010. The purpose and evaluate outcomes; and (3) may die as an unintended result of the
of the research is to assess watershed cooperate with other Federal and state activities.
conditions and limiting factors, and agencies and thereby share resources,
determine watershed health under the achieve common goals, and avoid Permit 1568
Northwest Forest Plan. The activities unnecessary duplication of effort and The NWFSC is requesting a 5–year
will benefit listed fish by providing the expense. The research would benefit the research permit to take juvenile PS
USFS with information to improve fish by helping improve management Chinook salmon. The purpose of this
forest management. The USFS proposes actions. The ONP would use snorkeling project is to provide information on the
to capture (using backpack and backpack electrofishing to assess basic life histories, ecology and genetic
electrofishing), anesthetize, measure, species presence and abundance. compositions of wild and hatchery
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

and release juvenile fish. The USFS Captured fish would be measured for juvenile Chinook salmon in the
does not intend to kill any fish being length and released. The ONP does not Snohomish River estuary. The study is
captured but some may die as an intend to kill any of the fish being designed to (1) characterize the ecology
unintentional result of the research captured but a small number may die as of existing Chinook salmon populations
activities. an unintended result of the activities. and life history types in the Snohomish

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:54 May 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1
27712 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Notices

River Estuary, and (2) evaluate how (TTY–TDD) may call (202) 606–3472 sponsors cost-share and others do not;
effectively habitat protection and between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern the effects of cost-sharing on sponsors;
restoration actions in the estuary help time, Monday through Friday. the potential for sponsors who are not
Chinook salmon populations in the ADDRESSES: Comments may be currently cost-sharing to do so
Snohomish River Basin. The submitted, identified by the title of the successfully in the future; current and
information gathered by this research information collection activity, to the potential sources of cost-share funds;
would benefit the fish by helping Office of Information and Regulatory and what actions the Corporation
recovery planning in the Snohomish Affairs, Attn: Ms. Rachel Potter, OMB should take to help sponsors cost-share.
River estuary and other estuaries of the Desk Officer for the Corporation for Independent, local field researchers will
Puget Sound. The fish would be National and Community Service, by be employed in collecting the
captured using Fyke nets and beach any of the following two methods information. During the data-gathering
seines. They would then be within 30 days from the publication in phase the researchers will refer to
anesthetized, measured, and weighed. this Federal Register: background information about the
The fish would also be tissue-sampled (1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974, Corporation, the VISTA program, and
and checked for external marks and Attention: Ms. Rachel Potter, OMB Desk the Field Network method.
coded-wire tags. A portion of the Officer for the Corporation for National Type of Review: New Information
captured fish would be sacrificed for and Community Service; and Collection.
full necropsy and a few more may die (2) Electronically by e-mail to: Agency: Corporation for National and
as an unintended result of the research. Rachel_F._Potter@omb.eop.gov. Community Service.
This notice is provided pursuant to Title: Field Network Pilot Study of
section 10(c) of the ESA. NMFS will SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB Cost-Sharing in VISTA, Field Guide and
evaluate the application, associated is particularly interested in comments Survey.
documents, and comments submitted to which: OMB Number: None.
determine whether the application • Evaluate whether the proposed Agency Number: None.
meets the requirements of section 10(a) collection of information is necessary Affected Public: Not-for-profit
of the ESA and Federal regulations. The for the proper performance of the institutions; State, Local, or Tribal
final permit decisions will not be made functions of the Corporation, including Governments.
until after the end of the 30–day whether the information will have Total Respondents: 1557 (Survey,
comment period. NMFS will publish practical utility; 1491; sponsor interviews, 110; funder
notice of its final action in the Federal • Evaluate the accuracy of the interviews, 66).
Register. agency’s estimate of the burden of the Frequency: Annually.
proposed collection of information, Average Time Per Response: Survey,
Dated: May 9, 2006.
including the validity of the 20 minutes; sponsor interviews, 2 hours;
Angela Somma, methodology and assumptions used; funder interviews, 1 hour.
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office • Propose ways to enhance the
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 783
quality, utility and clarity of the hours.
Fisheries Service.
information to be collected; and Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
[FR Doc. E6–7273 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am] • Propose ways to minimize the None.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S burden of the collection of information Total Burden Cost (operating/
to those who are to respond, including maintenance): None.
through the use of appropriate Comments submitted in response to
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND automated, electronic, mechanical, or this notice will be summarized and/or
COMMUNITY SERVICE other technological collection included in the request for Office of
techniques or other forms of information Management and Budget approval of the
Information Collection; Submission for technology, e.g. permitting electronic information collection request; they will
OMB Review, Comment Request submissions of responses. also become a matter of public record.
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Comments Dated: May 1, 2006.
Community Service. Robert Grimm,
ACTION: Notice. A 60-day public comment Notice was
published in the Federal Registeron Director, Department of Research and Policy
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National November 25, 2005. This comment Development.
and Community Service (hereinafter the period ended January 24, 2006. No [FR Doc. E6–7252 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am]
‘‘Corporation’’), has submitted a public public comments were received from BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
information collection request (ICR) this notice.
entitled the Field Network Pilot Study Description: The Corporation has
of Cost-Sharing in VISTA, Field Guide contracted with the Nelson A. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
and Survey (hereinafter ‘‘the VISTA Rockefeller Institute of Government to
Cost-Share Study’’) to the Office of carry out the VISTA Cost-Share Study to Office of the Secretary
Management and Budget (OMB) for analyze the potential for increasing the
review and approval in accordance with Meeting of the Secretary of Defense’s
number of VISTA cost-share members.
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Defense Advisory Board (DAB) for
The VISTA Cost-Share Study will
Public Law 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter Employer Support of the Guard and
consider the implications of such
35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable Reserve (ESGR)
expansion for the organizations where
supporting documentation, may be VISTA members serve (hereinafter
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.


obtained by calling the Corporation for ‘‘sponsors’’), given the Corporation’s
National and Community Service, Mr. commitment to serve communities in SUMMARY: This notice announces a
John Foster-Bey at (202) 606–6635. need. meeting of the DAB for ESGR. This
Individuals who use a The VISTA Cost-Share Study will be meeting will focus on the status of DoD
telecommunications device for the deaf used to assess the reasons why some actions and recommendations from

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:54 May 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1

You might also like