Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For online submission please insert your corrections in the online correction form.
Always indicate the line number to which the correction refers.
You can also insert your corrections in the proof PDF and email the annotated PDF.
For fax submission, please ensure that your corrections are clearly legible. Use a fine
black pen and write the correction in the margin, not too close to the edge of the page.
Remember to note the journal title, article number, and your name when sending your
response via e-mail or fax.
Check the metadata sheet to make sure that the header information, especially author
names and the corresponding affiliations are correctly shown.
Check the questions that may have arisen during copy editing and insert your
answers/corrections.
Check that the text is complete and that all figures, tables and their legends are included.
Also check the accuracy of special characters, equations, and electronic supplementary
material if applicable. If necessary refer to the Edited manuscript.
The publication of inaccurate data such as dosages and units can have serious
consequences. Please take particular care that all such details are correct.
Please do not make changes that involve only matters of style. We have generally
introduced forms that follow the journals style.
Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship are
not allowed without the approval of the responsible editor. In such a case, please contact
the Editorial Office and return his/her consent together with the proof.
If we do not receive your corrections within 48 hours, we will send you a reminder.
Your article will be published Online First approximately one week after receipt of your
corrected proofs. This is the official first publication citable with the DOI. Further
changes are, therefore, not possible.
Please note
After online publication, subscribers (personal/institutional) to this journal will have
access to the complete article via the DOI using the URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6938-x
If you would like to know when your article has been published online, take advantage
of our free alert service. For registration and further information, go to:
http://www.link.springer.com.
Due to the electronic nature of the procedure, the manuscript and the original figures
will only be returned to you on special request. When you return your corrections,
please inform us, if you would like to have these documents returned.
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
Article Title
Journal Name
Family Name
Particle
Given Name
8
9
Corresponding
Author
Kumar
Vinay
Suffix
Organization
S. P. Pune University
10
Division
11
Address
12
vinaymalik123@gmail.com
13
Family Name
Mapara
14
Particle
15
Given Name
16
17
Nikunj
Suffix
Author
Organization
S. P. Pune University
18
Division
19
Address
20
21
Family Name
22
Particle
23
Given Name
24
25
Sharma
Mansi
Suffix
Author
Organization
S. P. Pune University
26
Division
27
Address
28
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
29
Family Name
30
Particle
31
Given Name
32
Suffix
33
Author
Shriram
Varsha
Organization
S. P. Pune University
34
Division
35
Address
36
37
Family Name
38
Particle
39
Given Name
40
41
Author
Bharadwaj
Renu
Suffix
Organization
42
Division
Department of Microbiology
43
Address
44
45
Family Name
46
Particle
47
Given Name
48
49
Author
Mohite
K. C.
Suffix
Organization
50
Division
51
Address
52
53
Received
8 June 2015
Revised
6 August 2015
Accepted
11 August 2015
54
Schedule
55
56
Abstract
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
concentration of 300 g/ml. The SNPs exhibited antimicrobial activity against
all strains, with maximum zone of inhibition (16.4 mm) in XRD-PA-2 at
1000 g/ml. Amongst four strains, their susceptibilities to SNPs were in the
following order: XDR-PA-2 > XDR-PA-4 > XDR-PA-3 > XDR-PA-1. The
exposure of bacterial cells to 300 g/ml SNPs resulted into a substantial
leakage of reducing sugars and proteins, inactivation of respiratory chain
dehydrogenases, and eventual cell death. SNPs also induced lipid peroxidation,
a possible underlying factor to membrane porosity. The effects were more
pronounced in XDR-PA-2 which may be correlated with its higher
susceptibility to SNPs. These results are indicative of SNP-induced turbulence
of membranous permeability as an important causal factor in XDR-PA growth
inhibition and death.
57
Keywords separated
by ' - '
58
Foot note
information
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
1
3
2
4
5
Q1 6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Abstract Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading opportunistic pathogen and its expanding drug resistance is a growing
menace to public health. Its ubiquitous nature and multiple
resistance mechanisms make it a difficult target for antimicrobial chemotherapy and require a fresh approach for developing new antimicrobial agents against it. The broad-spectrum
antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) make them
an excellent candidate for use in the medical field. However,
attempts made to check their potency against extensively
drug-resistant (XDR) microbes are meager. This study describes the biosynthesis and biostabilization of SNPs by
Helicteres isora aqueous fruit extract and their characterization by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, transmission electron
microscopy, dynamic light scattering, X-ray diffraction, and
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Majority of SNPs
synthesized were of 8-20-nm size. SNPs exhibited dosedependent antibacterial activities against four P. aeruginosa
(XDR-PA) clinical isolates as revealed by growth curves, with
PR
O
O
7
8
9
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Introduction
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
PR
O
O
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
mechanisms makes it a difficult target for antimicrobial chemotherapy (Lim et al. 2011; Singh et al. 2014a). Its inherent
resistance mechanisms including low permeability of outer
membrane, activation of drug efflux pumps, and production
of antibiotic inactivating enzymes (Moore and Flaws 2011)
are major contributors for the emergence of multidrugresistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), or even
pandrug-resistant phenotypes.
Various definitions have been used so far in medical literature for antimicrobial resistance (Paterson and Doi 2007;
Falagas and Karageorgopoulos 2008), causing a considerable
confusion amongst researchers as well as clinicians. Therefore, a recent consensus was developed by a group of international experts through a joint initiative by the European Centre
for Disease Prevention and Control and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to create a standardized international terminology for describing the acquired resistance profiles in major pathogenic bacteria (including P. aeruginosa),
often responsible for healthcare-associated infections as well
as being prone to multidrug resistance (Magiorakos et al.
2012). According to these harmonized definitions, multidrug
resistance is the acquired non-susceptibility to at least one
agent in three or more antimicrobial categories recommended
by this panel using documents and breakpoints from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the European
Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
(EUCAST), and the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). Accordingly, extensive drug resistance was described
as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or
fewer antimicrobial categories, whereas pandrug resistance
(PDR) has been defined as non-susceptibility to all agents in
all antimicrobial categories.
In recent times, several P. aeruginosa nosocomial lifethreatening outbreaks have been reported in children and
adults with the progressive increase in the number of highly
drug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains (Kerr and Snelling, 2009;
Lanini et al. 2011; Atti et al. 2014). The wide spectrum of
diseases caused by this bacterium continues to grow from
urinary tract infection to septicemia, osteomyelitis, and endocarditis and thus posing new challenges as resistance to current empirical therapy limits the available treatment options
(Kerr and Snelling; 2009). Ironically, very few effective antibiotics are available for treating these infections, and, in some
cases, none at all (Pena et al. 2012). All this necessitates the
urgent need for fresh approaches to develop new bactericidals
to replenish the otherwise drying arsenal of anti-infective
agents against drug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains
(Amirulhusni et al. 2012; Rai et al. 2012; Singh et al. 2014a).
Nanotechnology provides a sound platform to alter the
physicochemical properties of metals to generate effective antimicrobials (Seil and Webster 2012). The synthesis of inorganic nanoparticles has gained unprecedented attention in recent years, due to their vast array of applications including
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Q2 81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163Q3
164
165
166
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
169
PR
O
O
XDR clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (XDR-PA), understanding the underlying antibacterial mechanism of SNPs.
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
167
168
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
t1:2
Antimicrobial categorya
Antimicrobial agent
PA-1
Amikacin
Gentamicin
Antipseudomonal cephalosporins
Ceftazidime
Antipseudomonal fluoroquinolones
Levofloxacin
Phosphonic acids
Fosfomycin
Polymyxins
Colistin
Antipseudomonal penicillins + -lactamase inhibitors Piperacillin-tazobactam
Antipseudomonal carbapenems
Meropenem
16
4
8
2
32
8
16
4
64
16
32
8
Aminoglycosides
>250
>250
100
>100
2
4
8
>50
16/4 32/464/4 128/4 >200/4
2
4
8
>10
t1:4
t1:5
t1:6
t1:7
t1:8
t1:9
t1:10
t1:11
PR
O
O
t1:1
PA-2
PA-3
PA-4
>1000
>1000
>1000
>100
>350
>50
>200/4
>10
>1000
>1000
>100
>100
300
>50
>200/4
>10
>1000
>1000
>1000
>100
>350
>50
>200/4
>10
t1:3
The antibiotics were selected as recommended by the International Consensus (Magiorakos et al. 2011) for characterizing the MDR/XDR or PDR
nature of P. aeruginosa
b
The MIC interpretive criteria for characterizing microbial strains as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) were followed (CLSI,
2014). The strains were characterized as extensively drug resistant owing to their non-susceptibility against at least one agent from all but two or
fewer antimicrobial categories
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay was performed to determine the concentration of malondialdehyde
(MDA, an indicator of lipid peroxidation) generated in the culture media (Dutta et al. 2012) with some modifications. Briefly,
an aliquot of 1 ml of culture medium was collected from the cells
subjected to SNP treatments for 0 and 3 h, as in case of determining the membrane leakages, and 200 l of 10 % SDS was
added and swirled vigorously. Two milliliters of freshly prepared
TBA was added to the reaction mix and incubated at 95 C for
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
261
262
263
264
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
Cytotoxicity of SNPs
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
Results
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
322
323
60 min. The reaction was allowed to cool to 25 C and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at a 530-nm wavelength and respective
concentration blanks were used while recording the absorbance.
PR
O
O
318
319
320
321
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
390
391
392
393
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
the biosynthesis of SNPs; the notable finding of this investigation was the particle size and a large proportion of synthesized SNPs were nanospheres in the size range of 1020 nm,
which was further confirmed by the size distribution histogram (Fig. 2b), determined by DLS. Further evidence of
SNP biosynthesis was provided by the XRD pattern as illustrated in Fig. 3a. The peak positions with 2 values confirmed
the typical planes (111, 200, 220, and 311; indicated by the red
lines in Fig. 3a) of silver and the obtained data matched with
the Joint Committee for Powder Diffraction Set and confirmed
face-centered cubic structure for the SNPs. These findings
confirmed the crystalline nature of SNPs, whereas their sizes,
as calculated using the Debye-Scherrers formula, as well as
observations under TEM reaffirmed the particle size.
The FTIR spectrum confirmed the presence of functional
groups in the sample, which coat-cover the SNPs and known
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
404
405
406
407
408
The antibacterial investigations were performed in the solution and on Petri dishes. The biosynthesized SNPs
showed dose-dependent antibacterial activities against all
the selected XDR-PA isolates as revealed by the growth
t2:1
t2:2
t2:4
t2:5
t2:6
t2:7
t2:8
t2:9
t2:10
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
XDR-PA-2
XDR-PA-3
XDR-PA-4
0.0
0.0
2.0
4.4
10.0
12.0
13.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
8.1
12.0
14.1
16.4
0.0
0.0
3.0
4.1
6.6
12.1
13.6
0.0
0.0
2.8
6.0
10.0
14.0
15.0
t2:3
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
the antibacterial activities were dose-dependent and increased with the SNP concentrations.
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
426
427
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
482
Cytotoxicity of SNPs
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
Discussion
493
494
495
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
PR
O
O
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the use of facilities created under the DST-FIST program implemented at Modern College,
Ganeshkhind, Pune. The authors sincerely thank the Dean, B.J. Govt.
Medical College, and the Principal, Modern College, for permitting to
work and utilize the necessary facilities.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing
interests.
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
References
656
657Q4=Q5
658
659
PR
O
O
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
JrnlID 253_ArtID 6938_Proof# 1 - 31/08/2015
PR
O
O
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
PR
O
O
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
834
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
AUTHOR'S PROOF!
AUTHOR QUERIES
AUTHOR PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUERIES.
U
N
C
O
R
R
EC
TE
D
PR
O
O
F