16180 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
61 / Thursday, March 30, 2006 / Notices
each document be filed. In the event
that confidential treatment of the
document is requested, at least four (4)
additional copies must be filed, in
which the confidential information
must be deleted (see the following
paragraph for further information
regarding confidential business
information). The Commission’s rules
do not authorize filing submissions with
the Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook
for Electronic Filing Procedures, ftp://
ftp.usitc.gov/pub/reports/
electronic_filing_handbook.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000) or
edis@usitc.gov).
Any submissions that contain
confidential business information must
also conform with the requirements of
section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
201.6). Section 201.6 of the rules
requires that the cover of the document
and the individual pages be clearly
marked as to whether they are the
‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘nonconfidential’’
version, and that the confidential
business information be clearly
identified by means of brackets. All
written submissions, except for
confidential business information, will
be made available in the Office of the
Secretary to the Commission for
inspection by interested parties.
The Commission may include some or
all of the confidential business
information submitted in the course of
these investigations in the report it
sends to the USTR and the President.
However, should the Commission
publish a public version of this report,
such confidential business information
will not be published in a manner that
would reveal the operations of the firm
supplying the information.
The public record for these
investigations may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing
impaired individuals may obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on
(202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Commission should contact the
Secretary at 202–205–2000.
List of Subjects: Malaysia, tariffs, and
imports.
Issued: March 24, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:32 Mar 29, 2006 Jkt 208001
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–4609 Filed 3–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Proposed Termination of Judgment
Notice is hereby given that Defendant
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. (‘‘Rolex’’),
successor in interest to Defendant the
American Rolex Watch Corporation in
United States v. The Watchmakers of
Switzerland Information Center, Inc.,
Civil Action No. 96–170 (S.D.N.Y.), has
filed a motion to terminate the Final
Judgment entered in that matter on
March 9, 1960 (‘‘Final Judgment’’) and
that the Department of Justice (‘‘the
Department’’), Antitrust Division, in a
stipulation also field with the Court, has
tentatively consented to termination of
the Final Judgment, but has reserved the
right to withdraw its consent pending
receipt of public comments.
The Final Judgment arose out of a
1950s investigation of the
anticompetitive practices of the Swiss
watch industry, including Swiss watch
manufacturers, Swiss trade associations,
and their United States importers. The
United States filed a complaint against
more than twenty watch companies and
trade association in 1954, including the
American Rolex Watch Corporation.
United States v. The Watchmakers of
Switzerland Information Center, Inc.,
Civil Action No. 96–170 (S.D.N.Y.
Complaint filed Oct. 19, 1954). The
United States made several allegations
in its complaint. It charged that certain
Swiss and U.S. manufacturers and
sellers of Swiss watches and watch parts
engaged in a conspiracy ‘‘to restrict,
eliminate and discourage the
manufacture of watches and watch parts
in the United States, and to restrain
United States imports and exports of
watches and watch parts for
manufacturing and repair purposes.’’ Id.
The United States also charged that
these companies agreed to fix minimum
pieces for watches and maximum prices
for repair parts, regulate the use and
distribution of watches and repair parts,
and boycott those who violated these
restrictions. Id. The conspiracy came
about through the adoption and
enforcement of an agreement known as
the Collective Convention of the Swiss
Watch Industry. ‘‘The purpose of the
Collection Convention was to protect,
develop and stabilize the Swiss watch
industry and to impede the growth of
PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
competitive watch industries outside of
Switzerland.’’ United States v. The
Watchmakers of Switzerland
Information Center, Inc., 1963–1 Trade
Cas. (CCH) ¶ 70,600, at 77,426 (S.D.N.Y.
Dec. 20, 1962).
On March 9, 1960, prior to trial, the
United States and the defendant
importers named in the complaint,
including Rolex, agreed to enter into the
Final Judgment in lieu of going to trial.
United States v. The Watchmakers of
Switzerland Information Center, Inc.,
Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 69,655
(S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 1960).
The Department has filed with the
Court a memorandum setting forth the
reasons why the United States believes
that termination of the Final Judgment
would serve the public interest. Copies
of Rolex’s motion to terminate, the
stipulation containing the United States’
tentative consent, the United States’
memorandum, and all further papers
filed with the Court in connection with
Rolex’s motion will be available for
inspection at the Antitrust Documents
Group, Antitrust Division, Room 215,
325 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20004, and at the Office of the Clerk of
the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York. Copies
of these materials may be obtained from
the Antitrust Division upon request and
payment of the copying fee set by
Department of Justice regulations.
Interested persons may submit
comments regarding the proposed
termination of the Final Judgment to the
United States. Such comments must be
received by the Antitrust Division
within sixty (60) days and will be filed
with the Court by the United States.
Comments should be addressed to John
R. Read, Chief, Litigation III Section,
Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of
Justice, 325 7th Street, NW., Suite 300,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations.
[FR Doc. 06–3059 Filed 3–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
Museums and Libraries Engaging
America’s Youth: Study of IMLS
Funded Grants, Submission for OMB
Review, Comment Request
AGENCY: Institute of Museum and
Library Services.
ACTION: Submission to OMB for Review,
Comment Request.
SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum and
Library Services announces the
30MRN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2006 / Notices
following information collection has
been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A
copy of this proposed form, with
applicable supporting documentation,
may be obtained by calling the Institute
of Museum and Library Services,
Director of Research and Technology,
Rebecca Danvers at (202) 652–4680.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY/TDD) may call (202) 606–8636.
This study is to undertake an analysis
of programs that provided services to
youth at museums, libraries, schools,
and universities and which were funded
by IMLS between 1998 and 2003 in
order to identify trends of museum and
library services in this area; examine the
impact and effectiveness of such
programs; and identify and disseminate
information on the best practices of
such programs.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 1, 2006. The OMB is particularly
interested in comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
ADDRESSES: For a copy of the form
contact: Rebecca Danvers, Director of
Research and Technology, Institute of
Museum and Library Services, 1800 M
St., NW., 9th floor, Washington, DC
200366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Institute of Museum and Library
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Services is an independent Federal
grant-making agency authorized by the
Museum and Library Services Act,
Public Law 104–208, as amended. The
IMLS provides a variety of grant
programs to assist the nation’s museums
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:32 Mar 29, 2006 Jkt 208001
and libraries in improving their
operations and enhancing their services
to the public. Museums and libraries of
all sizes and types may receive support
from IMLS programs.
The Museum and Library Services Act
includes a strong emphasis on
encouraging and assisting museums in
their educational role as core providers
of learning and in conjunction with
schools, families, and communities, and
strengthening library services to the
public. This study will assist IMLS in
understanding the design,
implementation, impact, and
effectiveness of youth-oriented projects
that it has funded. A final report will be
widely disseminated to assist
practitioners and prospective grant
applicants to design effective youth
programs.
Public Law 104–208 enacted on
September 30, 1996, as amended,
contains the Library Services and
Technology Act and the Museum
Services Act.
Public Law 104–208 authorizes the
Director of the Institute of Museum and
Library Services to carry out and
publish analyses that shall identify
national needs for, and trends of,
museum and library services; report on
the impact and effectiveness of
programs conducted with funds made
available by the Institute, and identify,
and disseminate information on the best
practices of such programs.
This study is to undertake an analysis
of programs that provided services to
youth at museums, libraries, schools,
and universities and which were funded
by IMLS between 1998 and 2003 in
order to identify trends of museum and
library services in this area; examine the
impact and effectiveness of such
programs; and identify and disseminate
information on the best practices of
such programs.
Agency: Institute of Museum and
Library Services.
Title: Museum and Libraries Engaging
America’s Youth Study.
OMB Number: None.
Agency Number: 3137.
Frequency: Once.
Affected Public: Museums, libraries,
schools and universities that provided
services to youth with IMLS funding.
Number of Respondents: 382 plus 60
interviews.
Estimated Time Per Respondent:
Various.
Total Burden Hours: 182.8 hours.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: n/a.
Total Annual Costs: $5783.00.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments should be sent to Office of
PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
16181
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn.: OMB Desk Officer for Education,
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503;
(202) 395–7316.
Dated: March 24, 2006.
Rebecca Danvers,
Director Research and Technology.
[FR Doc. 06–3056 Filed 3–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036–01–M
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Meetings of Humanities Panel
AGENCY: The National Endowment for
the Humanities.
ACTION: Additional notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463, as amended), notice is
hereby given that the following meeting
of the Humanities Panel will be held at
the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Gottry, Acting Advisory
Committee Management Officer,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, Washington, DC 20506;
telephone (202) 606–8322. Hearing-
impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter may be
obtained by contacting the
Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202)
606–8282.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed meeting is held for the
purpose of panel review, discussion,
evaluation and recommendation on
applications for financial assistance
under the National Foundation on the
Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as
amended, including discussion of
information given in confidence to the
agency by the grant applicants. Because
the proposed meeting will consider
information that is likely to disclose
trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential
and/or information of a personal nature
the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy, pursuant
to authority granted me by the
Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to
Close Advisory Committee meetings,
dated July 19, 1993, I have determined
that this meeting will be closed to the
public pursuant to subsections (c)(4),
and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United
States Code.
Date: April 21, 2006.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
30MRN1