You are on page 1of 355

SOFT DRINKS SERVICE

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

Section 3A
Section 3B
Section 3C
Section 3D
Section 3E
Section 3F
Section 3G
Section 3H
Section 3I
Section 3J
Section 3K
Section 3L

Packaged Water
Bulk/HOD Water
Carbonates
Juice
Nectars
Still Drinks
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks

Methodology
Soft Drinks Attributes Definitions
Product Definitions
Packaging Definitions
Glossary
Map

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

VOLUME
JUICE
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2009

31.1

26.8

31.1

26.8

0.0
0.1
Data revised to take into account the full affect of the financial crisis on this category.

HAPPY DAY
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
FRUVITA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE

NECTARS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

2008

2.2
1.2
-45.7

1.9
1.5
-20.5

0.3
1.3
370.4

2.1
1.4
-32.0

170.5
159.5
-6.5
Data revised to take into account the full affect of the financial crisis on this category.

LA VITA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
VOCNA DOLINA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE

STILL DRINKS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

64.7
48.7
-24.7
9.7
13.7
41.7

17.5

30.4

39.0

49.8

55.8

69.9

76.6

76.4

21.6

45.6

56.2

72.9

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

23.4
49.8
44.0
46.4
41.8
41.7
41.4
41.2
Aqua Viva brand was reclassified from a still drink to a sports drink. Previous years
volumes were revised based on new information as Canadean has extended its scope
and area of research in the market.

HELLO
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
FRUTELLA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE

PDF Editor

9.3
15.3
64.9

11.1
21.1
90.1

16.0
22.0
37.5

17.6
28.6
62.7

20.3
33.3
64.2

21.5
32.5
51.1
8.5
7.7
-9.8

VOLUME
SQUASH/SYRUPS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

FRUTELLA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
NECTAR
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
BIP
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
TAKOVO
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
LA VITA
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE

ICED/RTD TEA
DRINKS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

1.8

2.4

3.9

4.9

7.1

8.4

8.9

8.9

20.1

23.2

23.6

24.3

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

1031.1
872.7
507.9
398.8
248.6
200.6
192.2
192.5
Previous years volumes were revised based on new information as Canadean has
extended its scope and area of research in the market.

0.2
2.5
1031.1

0.2
2.4
872.7

0.3
1.6
507.9

0.6
3.1
398.8

1.3
4.6
248.6

1.7
5.2
200.6

2.0
5.8
192.2

2.1
6.0
193.7

0.1
0.6
1031.1

0.1
0.7
872.7

0.3
1.7
507.9

0.5
2.3
398.8

1.2
4.3
248.6

1.9
5.8
200.6

2.1
6.2
192.2

2.6
4.6
76.3

0.3
3.0
1031.1

0.4
3.6
872.7

0.7
4.3
507.9

0.8
4.2
398.8

1.1
3.9
248.6

1.0
3.0
200.6

0.8
2.3
192.2

0.4
3.6
831.2

0.9
2.7
200.6

1.1
3.1
192.2

1.5
4.2
190.4

0.1
1.2
1031.1
0.4
2.0
398.8

0.4
1.4
248.6

0.2
0.7
200.6

0.2
0.6
192.2

0.4
1.2
160.7

5.3

6.1

7.2

9.8

13.8

5.8

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

9.4
10.2
-2.0
2.7
Previous years volumes were revised based on new information as Canadean has
extended its scope and area of research in the market.

HELLO
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE
RAUCH
2010 CYCLE TOTAL
2011 CYCLE TOTAL
% CHANGE

SPORTS DRINKS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE

PDF Editor

0.3
0.8
190.0

6.0

1.6
0.8
-49.0

1.7
1.0
-40.8

1.6
1.2
-28.7

0.3
0.9
206.7

0.6
1.2
106.7

0.8
1.8
121.3

0.3
0.8

VOLUME
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

DRINKING YOGURT
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

FERMENTED MILK
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
FLAVOURED MILK
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
SOYMILK
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
WHITE MILK
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

HOT COFFEE
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009
139.8

Aqua Viva brand was reclassified from a still drink to a sports drink.

9.1

9.4

9.6

9.9

7.0

9.1

11.1

11.6

118.8

126.0

131.0

135.3

139.5

143.5

147.3

141.3

1205.5 1240.4 1264.6 1266.7 1892.9 1471.2 1227.2


1116.4
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

5.0

5.7

6.0

5.9

9.0

7.4

9.5

9.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

-100.0
-100.0
-100.0
-98.7
-99.1
-95.8
-95.9
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-95.2

37.8

38.1

38.4

38.7

36.8

33.0

32.0

27.6

7.8

10.0

13.4

14.3

15.7

16.5

17.9

16.6

-79.4
-73.8
-65.1
-63.0
-57.3
-50.0
-44.2
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-39.8

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.2

1.3

1.5

2.0

3.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.0

-100.0
-100.0
-50.0
-50.0
-46.2
-40.0
-50.0
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-67.0

775.6

734.8

730.0

729.4

729.4

712.4

691.0

678.5

360.2

351.0

326.6

283.0

272.3

260.0

261.1

247.1

-53.6
-52.2
-55.3
-61.2
-62.7
-63.5
-62.2
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-63.6

360.0

360.0

361.0

368.2

370.3

372.6

376.0

378.8

286.4

292.2

298.1

274.4

265.3

259.7

259.8

258.7

PDF Editor

VOLUME

2002

% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
HOT TEA
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

WINE
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
SPIRITS
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE
FORTIFIED WINE
2010 CYCLE
TOPLINE
2011 CYCLE
TOPLINE
% CHANGE
RATIONALE FOR
CHANGE

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

-20.4
-18.8
-17.4
-25.5
-28.4
-30.3
-30.9
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

2009
-31.7

289.8

285.9

289.6

293.6

294.8

298.4

302.0

310.0

112.8

112.8

112.1

111.7

111.3

111.6

113.6

119.0

-61.1
-60.5
-61.3
-62.0
-62.2
-62.6
-62.4
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-61.6

92.2

91.3

90.9

89.2

90.4

89.1

87.7

88.1

65.4

65.4

62.8

55.4

53.6

51.9

50.8

50.6

-29.1
-28.4
-30.9
-37.9
-40.7
-41.8
-42.1
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-42.6

58.9

58.0

57.7

57.2

60.1

60.5

62.0

61.5

25.8

25.2

23.1

18.7

18.4

17.5

17.7

16.8

-56.2
-56.5
-60.0
-67.3
-69.4
-71.1
-71.5
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

-72.7

6.8

6.8

5.2

4.2

4.4

4.1

3.6

3.2

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.4

-89.7
-89.7
-86.7
-87.0
-89.3
-90.4
-86.1
Volumes were revised to correct previous over estimated decline in volume when
Kosovo sales were deducted from total Serbian market.

SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

-86.3

PDF Editor

Strong drop in 2009 was slowed in 2010


After a decline in 2009, the effects of the economic crisis slowly diminished in 2010. Nonetheless, high
unemployment, combined with a lack of consumer confidence prevented further growth of the soft drinks
market.
Price promotions in large modern retail outlets remained the main driver for growth. With this in mind, most of
the marketing activities and product innovations were postponed or reduced.
Private Label lines did not fully exploit the increased demand for lower priced goods, and instead faced
competition from smaller, local operators with aggressive pricing strategies. Pack sizes increased, on average,
to provide value to consumers.

Prices being hit hard by the currency depreciation


As the currency slowly depreciated the producers sale strategy was to delay any price increase by as long as
possible.
Modern retail, with aggressive pricing and strong above the line promotions, continued to take share from the
traditional trade. Consumers started to cut down on the number of visits, normally during weekends, to
traditional retailers. The key driver was promotions with flyers and discounts. On-premise was hit more
severely than off-premise as consumer budgets remained tight.
Small companies tried to adapt by offering attractive prices to supermarkets for Private Label production. The
alternative was to continue trying to develop their brand with small marketing budgets. In the face of this,
helping to develop Private Label lines was seen as a necessary evil in the fight for sales.
Two parallel trends were visible in many categories; either a switch to the lower price segments (e.g. towards
PET, lower juice content, bigger pack sizes) or a switch towards healthier and more premium products (e.g.
squeezed chilled juices at home, branded energy drinks and carbonates) that target the small, wealthy
population.
Private Label lines did not benefit from the poor economic conditions as Serbian consumers preferred branded
products. Consumers have more confidence in branded products during the crisis than Private Label. Private
Label also did not have the price advantage, particularly in nectars and still drinks, which it normally enjoys.

Company activity
The Serbian soft drinks market has seen much consolidation in a number of categories in recent years. The
fruit powders category in particular is dominated by Atlantic Grupas brands Cedevita and, following its 2007
acquisition, Multivita.
Bankruptcy also took hold in the past few years. Si&Si lost its franchise for Sinalco carbonates. Unija
Distributera Srbije picked this licence up in 2010 for 0.5 m. Gazprom Neft acquired the packaged water brand
Jazak and made substantial investments at the end of 2010. The acquisition was a result of the purchase of
previous owner NIS, Serbias oil monopoly, in a deal worth around 400 m. While the main purchase was NIS,
Gazprom Neft also acquired Jazak as a result.

PDF Editor

Market Environment ............................................................................................................................................ 2


The Consumer Palate ......................................................................................................................................... 2
All Commercial Beverages .................................................................................................................................. 3
Legislation and Taxation ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Table 1.1.1 Population Size and Growth 1982-2012F ..................................................................................... 4
Table 1.1.2 East Europe Population Size and Growth 2001-2011F ................................................................ 5
Table 1.2 Economic Indicators, 2002-2012F ................................................................................................... 5
Table 1.3 Average Monthly Temperatures (Belgrade) 2005-2009 .................................................................. 5
Table 1.4.1 East Europe Beverage Consumption Per Capita Litres Per Capita, 2001-2011F ..................... 6
Table 1.4.2 East Europe Beverage Consumption Per Capita % Share, 2001-2011F .................................. 7
Table 1.4.3 East Europe Beverage Consumption Per Capita Growth, 2001-2011F .................................... 8

PDF Editor

Market Environment
First signs of stability
Serbia is located at the axis of central and south-eastern Europe and enjoys a climate of cold winters and hot
summers; as a result, demand can be very cyclical. In 2010, warmer than anticipated autumn and winter
seasons helped the carbonates and packaged water categories in particular.
Despite the global downturn, GDP in Serbia increased by at least 1.8% in 2010. A 1% increase in real wages
came in spite of the 26% unemployment rate. Consumers felt the squeeze more than ever in the face of higher
prices and a smaller budget.
Inflation was around 10.5%, caused by the increased price of commodities, like oil and agricultural products,
for the past few years and also a currency depreciation of almost 15%. Optimistic forecasts for 2011 see GDP
growing 3.5%, but, the economy is not expected to recover to pre-crash levels until after 2013.
The global crisis reduced foreign investment and hampered efforts to privatise the remaining state-owned
assets. Efforts to prepare viable companies for sale continued in 2010. The recovery process was being
damaged by an unstable economy and a questionable banking sector. Close cooperation among regulators,
domestic and foreign banks and international financial institutions has ensured that credit will reach
businesses and consumers.
Serbian state debt grew over 30% and reached 12.2 bn and now represents 41.5% of GDP. Serbia remains
strictly committed to its European Union future and the implementation of EU laws and regulations, with the
sovereignty of Kosovo as the only pending issue but also not conditional for EU membership. After years of
economic and political instability, wars and daily double digit currency depreciation in the previous decade, this
crisis seems to be manageable for a very experienced population.
Besides a decreasing population (-4.6% natural increase rate), in recent years there has been a large trend for
rural-urban migration, which has led to the expansion of many cities.

The Consumer Palate


Consumers behaviour became much more rational
An increased risk of unemployment and stringent lending conditions in the banking sector created much more
rational consumer behaviour.
Home cooking and the traditional heavy lunch, with lots of grilled meat, roast pork and lamb, is a very
important part of the day. On the other hand, the urban population (57%) are getting more educated as
consumers. A more modern lifestyle and a lack of free time forced consumers to replace the traditional hot
lunch with a more convenient alternative. The local palate combines elements of Oriental, Mediterranean and
Austro-Hungarian food, as the country is located on the crossroads between east and west. Western foods
that are popular are traditionally homemade jellies, jams and pickled food.
Despite the economic downturn, consumers were more focussed on health, fully supported by anti-obesity
media campaigns and healthy food promotions.

PDF Editor

All Commercial Beverages


Soft drinks continued to take share
Over the last ten years, soft drinks have continued to take a greater share of the total commercial beverage
market. Key categories like packaged water and carbonates grew by 2% in 2010.
White milk, as a key ACB category, fell due to the milk shortage in the second half of 2010. A dispute among
farmers, producers and the government made white milk businesses unprofitable. As a consequence,
Fermented milk fell sharper than white milk but a full recovery is expected in Q1-11. Drinking yogurt, a
traditional part of consumer drinking habits, benefited from this shortage.
After years of sharp growth, beer saw another poor year, together with a continued lack of spirits consumption
due to the strict implementation of drink-drive policies and health concerns.
The culture of drinking wine is popular amongst small segments of the population. Wine consumption is highly
dependant on disposable income, which is why the total consumption has decreased over time. TV shows
have helped to educate the population about wine and a number of small Serbian vineyards are in use.
Growth in the consumption of hot tea was driven by fruit-based teas and Private Label lines. Seasonality and
perceived exclusivity diminished among consumers and the category is expected to have a bright future
ahead.
Hot coffee, as a highly consolidated market, remained stable. Traditional coffee (92%) had two leading brands,
Don and Grand, and they continued to dominate the market, accounting for over 80% of brand share.

Legislation and Taxation


VAT remained at 18%; soft drinks carried no licensing requirements or separate taxes and levies.
In an effort to reduce smoking in a country where as many as one in three are estimated to smoke, a new
smoking law was adopted in May, 2010, and began to be implemented in November. This Act prohibited
smoking in all public and work spaces as well as many entertainment venues. Large fines are given to
individuals and businesses that breach this law. Small cafs and bars can choose to be smoke-free or not,
while larger ones and restaurants must all be smoke-free.
Similarly, an alcohol ban was introduced that forbade its sale from 22:00h - 06:00h in retailers, petrol stations
and kiosks, from May, 2011. For the first time, after several years of attempts, the Fruits of Serbia association
was founded in September 2010. It associates 10 of the biggest JNSD producers to support common interests
of its members.

PDF Editor

YEAR

MILLION

% CHG

% CHG PA

1982
1983
1984
1985
1986

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

1982-1983
1983-1984
1984-1985
1985-1986

na
na
na
na

1987
1988
1989
1990
1991

.000
.000
.000
.000
9.537

1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
1989-1990
1990-1991

na
na
na
na
na

1982-1987

na

1992
1993
1994
1995
1996

9.662
9.777
9.872
9.938
9.971

1991-1992
1992-1993
1993-1994
1994-1995
1995-1996

1.31%
1.19%
0.97%
0.67%
0.33%

1987-1992

na

1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

10.017
10.025
10.037
9.631
9.636

1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001

0.46%
0.08%
0.12%
-4.04%
0.05%

1992-1997

0.72%

2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

9.485
9.497
9.504
7.441
7.412

2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006

-1.57%
0.12%
0.08%
-21.71%
-0.39%

1997-2002

-1.09%

2007
2008
2009
2010F
2011F

7.382
7.350
7.350
7.331
7.266

2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010F
2010F-2011F

-0.40%
-0.42%
0.00%
-0.26%
-0.89%

2002-2007

-4.89%

2012F

7.236

2011F-2012F

-0.41%

2002-2012F

-2.67%

SOURCE : IHSGlobal Insight (IHSGI); Canadean

PDF Editor

Country

THOUSANDS
2001

% OF TOTAL

% CHG PA

2010

2011F

2001

2010

2011F

01-11F

01-10

10-11F

Belarus
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Poland
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Turkey
Ukraine

9,951
9,529
3,798
3,818
7,891
7,497
4,482
4,410
10,206 10,447
1,367
1,339
10,187
9,973
2,366
2,240
3,483
3,255
2,032
2,043
38,251 38,038
22,408 21,190
145,266 140,367
9,636
7,331
5,379
5,419
1,988
2,025
67,444 75,705
48,923 45,814

9,475
3,807
7,451
4,403
10,443
1,339
9,954
2,231
3,233
2,044
37,988
21,108
139,873
7,266
5,422
2,029
76,582
45,484

2.5%
1.0%
2.0%
1.1%
2.6%
0.3%
2.6%
0.6%
0.9%
0.5%
9.7%
5.7%
36.8%
2.4%
1.4%
0.5%
17.1%
12.4%

2.4%
1.0%
1.9%
1.1%
2.7%
0.3%
2.6%
0.6%
0.8%
0.5%
9.7%
5.4%
36.0%
1.9%
1.4%
0.5%
19.4%
11.7%

2.4%
1.0%
1.9%
1.1%
2.7%
0.3%
2.6%
0.6%
0.8%
0.5%
9.7%
5.4%
35.9%
1.9%
1.4%
0.5%
19.6%
11.7%

-0.5%
0.0%
-0.6%
-0.2%
0.2%
-0.2%
-0.2%
-0.6%
-0.7%
0.1%
-0.1%
-0.6%
-0.4%
-2.8%
0.1%
0.2%
1.3%
-0.7%

-0.5%
0.1%
-0.6%
-0.2%
0.3%
-0.2%
-0.2%
-0.6%
-0.8%
0.1%
-0.1%
-0.6%
-0.4%
-3.0%
0.1%
0.2%
1.3%
-0.7%

-0.6%
-0.3%
-0.6%
-0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
-0.2%
-0.4%
-0.7%
0.0%
-0.1%
-0.4%
-0.4%
-0.9%
0.1%
0.2%
1.2%
-0.7%

East Europe

395,060 390,439

390,131

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

-0.1%

-0.1%

-0.1%

SOURCE : IHSGlobal Insight (IHSGI); Canadean

Real GDP
CPI Period Average

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F 2012F

22.1

22.6

24.5

25.9

27.3

29.3

30.5

29.6

30.0

30.9

32.5

75.7

78.0

85.8

100.0

111.7

119.0

138.4

151.1

161.9

175.1

187.8

Real Private
Consumption

18.6

18.2

19.0

20.0

21.1

22.1

22.9

22.0

22.4

23.1

24.0

Exchange Rate Local


Currency v US$

64.5

57.6

58.4

66.7

67.1

58.4

55.8

67.6

71.9

68.0

64.9

SOURCE : IHSGlobal Insight (IHSGI); Canadean

Deg C

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

NOV

DEC

2005
2006
2007
2008
2009

0.8
-1.4
5.8
2.6
-0.8

-2.8
1.1
6.1
5.4
2.5

5.1
6.3
8.9
8.6
7.6

11.9
13.3
13.7
13.2
15.1

17.8
16.6
19.0
18.5
19.0

19.6
19.3
22.8
22.4
20.3

21.9
23.5
24.6
22.9
23.4

20.4
20.1
23.7
23.3
23.5

18.0
18.6
15.9
16.6
20.0

12.5
14.2
10.8
14.2
12.8

5.6
7.6
4.3
8.6
8.9

2.4
2.5
1.1
4.3
4.0

1.4

2.5

7.3

13.4

18.2

20.9

23.3

22.2

17.8

12.9

7.0

2.9

Average 20052009

SOURCE : Met Office (UK); Canadean

PDF Editor

Volume

2001

2002

2003

2004

LITRES PER CAPITA


2005
2006
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

All Commercial Beverages


[1]

357.3

373.8

386.6

395.9

411.1

433.3

455.3

462.4

451.0

448.2

457.2

Soft Drinks [2]


Packaged Water [2]
Carbonates
Juice
Nectars
Still Drinks
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks

67.5
21.3
30.1
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.8
1.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1

75.7
23.9
33.6
4.4
4.3
3.9
3.8
1.2
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.1

83.2
27.0
36.3
4.7
5.3
4.3
3.8
1.0
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.1

89.0
28.4
38.7
5.3
6.1
4.5
3.9
1.0
0.8
0.0
0.1
0.2

96.3
31.2
41.1
5.8
6.9
4.8
4.0
0.9
1.1
0.0
0.1
0.3

105.8
34.9
43.9
6.6
8.0
5.3
4.0
1.0
1.6
0.0
0.1
0.4

116.0
39.2
46.5
7.1
9.0
5.8
4.1
1.0
2.5
0.0
0.1
0.6

118.4
40.1
46.5
6.6
9.4
6.2
4.4
1.0
3.2
0.1
0.2
0.9

111.7
38.7
43.1
5.0
9.4
6.1
4.5
1.0
2.9
0.1
0.2
0.9

112.0
39.3
42.4
5.0
9.4
6.2
4.6
1.0
3.0
0.1
0.2
1.0

115.8
41.0
43.5
5.9
8.9
6.4
4.6
0.9
3.3
0.1
0.2
1.0

Dairy Drinks

52.9

54.8

54.5

53.5

54.3

56.1

55.9

55.9

55.6

56.3

56.6

179.1
34.6
144.5

181.5
37.4
144.1

183.7
41.2
142.6

184.6
43.4
141.2

188.6
46.1
142.5

193.9
48.2
145.7

198.2
50.2
148.0

203.1
49.1
154.0

203.9
49.1
154.8

205.3
49.7
155.6

206.3
50.7
155.6

57.7
43.1
0.0
6.1
6.4
1.3
0.8

61.8
46.6
0.0
6.3
6.6
1.3
1.0

65.1
49.6
0.0
6.2
6.6
1.3
1.3

68.8
52.6
0.0
6.5
6.7
1.5
1.5

72.0
56.2
0.1
6.2
6.6
1.4
1.6

77.6
61.5
0.1
6.3
6.6
1.3
1.8

85.2
68.5
0.1
6.6
6.7
1.3
2.0

85.0
68.5
0.1
6.8
6.6
1.2
1.9

79.7
64.2
0.1
6.6
6.1
1.0
1.7

74.6
59.2
0.1
6.6
6.1
1.0
1.7

78.5
63.0
0.1
6.7
6.0
1.0
1.8

395.1

394.3

393.7

393.4

391.5

391.1

391.0

391.0

390.8

390.4

390.1

Hot Beverages
Coffee
Tea
Alcoholic Drinks
Beer
Cider
Wine
Spirits
Fortified Wine
FABs (inc Coolers)
Population (Million)

[1] Comprising the 18 countries of Canadeans West Europe Soft Drinks Service
[2] Excludes bulk/HOD water cooler volume
SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

Volume

% SHARE
2006
2007

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Soft Drinks [2]


Packaged Water [2]
Carbonates
Juice
Nectars
Still Drinks
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks

18.9%
5.9%
8.4%
1.1%
1.0%
0.9%
1.1%
0.4%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

20.2%
6.4%
9.0%
1.2%
1.2%
1.1%
1.0%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

21.5%
7.0%
9.4%
1.2%
1.4%
1.1%
1.0%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

22.5%
7.2%
9.8%
1.3%
1.5%
1.1%
1.0%
0.3%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

23.4%
7.6%
10.0%
1.4%
1.7%
1.2%
1.0%
0.2%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%

Dairy Drinks

14.8%

14.7%

14.1%

13.5%

Hot Beverages
Coffee
Tea

50.1%
9.7%
40.4%

48.6%
10.0%
38.6%

47.5%
10.7%
36.9%

Alcoholic Drinks
Beer
Cider
Wine
Spirits
Fortified Wine
FABs (inc Coolers)

16.2%
12.1%
0.0%
1.7%
1.8%
0.4%
0.2%

16.5%
12.5%
0.0%
1.7%
1.8%
0.3%
0.3%

Population (Million)

395.1

394.3

All Commercial
Beverages [1]

2008

2009

2010

2011F

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

24.4%
8.1%
10.1%
1.5%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.2%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%

25.5%
8.6%
10.2%
1.6%
2.0%
1.3%
0.9%
0.2%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%

25.6%
8.7%
10.1%
1.4%
2.0%
1.3%
0.9%
0.2%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%

24.8%
8.6%
9.5%
1.1%
2.1%
1.4%
1.0%
0.2%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%

25.0%
8.8%
9.5%
1.1%
2.1%
1.4%
1.0%
0.2%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%

25.3%
9.0%
9.5%
1.3%
1.9%
1.4%
1.0%
0.2%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%

13.2%

12.9%

12.3%

12.1%

12.3%

12.6%

12.4%

46.6%
11.0%
35.7%

45.9%
11.2%
34.7%

44.7%
11.1%
33.6%

43.5%
11.0%
32.5%

43.9%
10.6%
33.3%

45.2%
10.9%
34.3%

45.8%
11.1%
34.7%

45.1%
11.1%
34.0%

16.8%
12.8%
0.0%
1.6%
1.7%
0.3%
0.3%

17.4%
13.3%
0.0%
1.6%
1.7%
0.4%
0.4%

17.5%
13.7%
0.0%
1.5%
1.6%
0.3%
0.4%

17.9%
14.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.5%
0.3%
0.4%

18.7%
15.0%
0.0%
1.5%
1.5%
0.3%
0.4%

18.4%
14.8%
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
0.3%
0.4%

17.7%
14.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
0.2%
0.4%

16.6%
13.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
0.2%
0.4%

17.2%
13.8%
0.0%
1.5%
1.3%
0.2%
0.4%

393.7

393.4

391.5

391.1

391.0

391.0

390.8

390.4

390.1

[1] Comprising the 18 countries of Canadeans West Europe Soft Drinks Service
[2] Excludes bulk/HOD water cooler volume
SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

Volume

% CHANGE
05-06 06-07

01-10

06-10

03-04

04-05

2.6%

0.8%

2.4%

3.8%

5.4%

5.8%
7.1%
3.9%
3.1%
11.1%
7.0%
2.3%
-2.8%
31.8%
29.7%
17.5%
31.6%

1.4%
3.0%
-0.9%
-6.7%
4.2%
4.1%
3.2%
-0.5%
16.2%
12.4%
9.0%
28.2%

6.9%
5.2%
6.8%
11.8%
16.0%
4.2%
1.9%
-3.5%
38.3%
20.8%
28.1%
41.0%

8.1%
9.6%
6.1%
10.5%
12.1%
5.9%
4.2%
-5.2%
49.3%
67.2%
1.6%
38.3%

Dairy Drinks

0.7%

0.1%

-1.8%

Hot Beverages
Coffee
Tea

1.5%
4.1%
0.8%

1.4%
0.8%
1.7%

Alcoholic Drinks
Beer
Cider
Wine
Spirits
Fortified Wine
FABs (inc Coolers)

2.9%
3.6%
19.7%
0.9%
-0.6%
-2.7%
8.1%

Population (Million)

-0.1%

All Commercial Beverages [1]


Soft Drinks [2]
Packaged Water [2]
Carbonates
Juice
Nectars
Still Drinks
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks

07-08

08-09

5.1%

1.6%

-2.5%

-0.6%

2.0%

9.9%
12.0%
6.7%
12.6%
16.4%
10.3%
0.8%
4.2%
43.6%
19.1%
21.2%
32.8%

9.6%
12.4%
6.1%
7.6%
12.6%
9.2%
2.0%
3.0%
50.0%
27.5%
22.0%
65.5%

2.1%
2.3%
-0.1%
-7.1%
5.1%
7.1%
5.7%
-6.5%
29.6%
28.0%
18.8%
45.7%

-5.7%
-3.6%
-7.4%
-23.4%
-0.7%
-1.2%
2.4%
1.0%
-9.5%
-4.2%
-4.5%
4.2%

0.2%
1.5%
-1.6%
-1.0%
0.3%
1.5%
2.7%
0.9%
3.8%
2.3%
1.9%
7.4%

3.3%
4.5%
2.5%
17.7%
-5.7%
2.9%
-0.5%
-2.5%
11.0%
10.5%
7.7%
8.5%

1.5%

3.3%

-0.3%

-0.1%

-0.4%

1.2%

0.6%

0.5%
5.4%
-0.9%

2.1%
6.2%
0.9%

2.8%
4.6%
2.2%

2.2%
4.1%
1.6%

2.5%
-2.3%
4.0%

0.4%
0.2%
0.5%

0.7%
1.2%
0.5%

0.5%
2.0%
0.0%

-1.0%
-1.0%
-6.4%
1.1%
-2.1%
-6.0%
-1.4%

5.6%
6.0%
65.3%
4.1%
1.1%
10.3%
13.2%

4.7%
6.8%
36.4%
-4.3%
-0.9%
-6.6%
6.2%

7.7%
9.6%
48.3%
1.9%
0.3%
-8.4%
8.5%

9.8%
11.3%
-5.6%
5.3%
1.5%
-0.3%
14.5%

-0.2%
-0.1%
-9.7%
2.3%
-2.2%
-4.9%
-3.6%

-6.3%
-6.3%
-5.6%
-3.3%
-6.3%
-13.7%
-12.0%

-6.4%
-7.8%
-4.6%
0.5%
-1.3%
-4.5%
-2.8%

5.3%
6.4%
-14.3%
2.2%
-0.9%
1.4%
5.7%

0.0%

-0.1%

-0.5%

-0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

-0.1%

-0.1%

-0.1%

[1] Comprising the 18 countries of Canadeans West Europe Soft Drinks Service
[2] Excludes bulk/HOD water cooler volume
SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

09-10 10-11F

Chart - Soft Drinks Market Trends - Core categories, 2001 - 2011F .................................................................. 2
Soft Drinks Consumption - Million Litres, 2007-2011F........................................................................................ 3
Chart - Soft Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ............................................................. 3
Companies .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Packaging Trends ............................................................................................................................................... 4
Market Valuation & Pricing .................................................................................................................................. 5
Distribution Trends .............................................................................................................................................. 5
Table 2.9 Trade Margins Build-Up Model, 2010 .............................................................................................. 6
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita, 2000-2011F ......................................................................... 7
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita including Bulk/HOD Water, 2000-2011F .............................. 8
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita - % Share, 2000-2011F ........................................................ 9
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita - % Share including Bulk/HOD Water, 2000-2011F ........... 10
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita - Growth, 2000-2011F ........................................................ 11
Commercial Beverage Consumption - per Capita - Growth including Bulk/HOD Water, 2000-2011F ............. 12
Commercial Beverage Consumption - Million Litres, 2000-2011F ................................................................... 13
Commercial Beverage Consumption - Million Litres including Bulk/HOD Water, 2000-2011F ........................ 14
Soft Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ................................................................................ 15
Soft Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption - % Share, 2000-2011F ............................................................... 16
Soft Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption - Growth, 2000-2011F ................................................................. 18
Soft Drinks Market Valuation (Local Currency), 2009-2011F ........................................................................... 19
Top 20 Soft Drinks Brands, 2010 ...................................................................................................................... 20
Soft Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix, 2007-2011F ........................................................................................ 21
Soft Drinks Distribution ON vs OFF by Category, 2007-2011F ........................................................................ 22
Soft Drinks Key Local Market Segments, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................... 23

PDF Editor

Growth in key categories loses fizz

Rationalisation trends continued in 2010. On a product level, optimization of flavours, SKUs and cost
cutting efforts could be seen. Producers were mostly focused on defending their market positions. The
real winners were iced/rtd tea drinks and bulk/HOD water, which made strong gains in value terms.

Key volume categories, packaged water and carbonates, recorded growth of around 2%. Nectars and
still drinks continued to suffer; a higher drop was avoided mostly due to the popularity of multipacks
and large pack sizes. Promotions in large modern retailers were supported by favourable weather
during the second half of 2010.

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

1401.7

Total Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

Total Carbonates

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

Total Still Drinks

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

Total Squash/Syrups

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

Total Fruit Powders

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

Total Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

Total Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Total Sports Drinks

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

Total Energy Drinks

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

Total

Total Juice
Total Nectars

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Companies
No significant corporate activity
Coca-Cola, considering its presence in key soft drinks categories, continued its strong leadership in the soft
drinks arena. Besides having a very strong position in the package water market, Knjaz Milos was still waiting
to be sold by the current owners.
Vino Zupa and Fruvitas double digit drop in nectars and still drinks was partly compensated for with relatively
young companies-Bahus and Eliksir Natura.
Atlantic Grupa (initially Cedevita brand owner) acquired Droga Kolinska, with its companies Palanacki Kiseljak
(Cockta carbonates and Palanacki Kiseljak packaged water producer) in July 2010. Already owning Mutivita,
(local powder drinks brand), this company became a very important player, especially in fruit powders.
Cedevita and Multivita, now under one company, held over a 90% market share.
Rauch changed its distributor from Nelt (Procter & Gamble distributor) to FMCG distributor, MD International
(current Henkel partner) which is exclusively in charge of traditional trade channels. Furthermore, Rauch
invested in new a 200cl Combiblock production line.
Sinalco made an agreement with its new distributor Unija Distrubutera Srbije and with the new bottler Frutiko
from Sabac. Besides these small changes, there was no significant corporate activity; M&A negotiations were
on hold, pending lower prices.

Packaging Trends
Shifting towards large size and multi packs
PET dominated in key soft categories and registered growth while glass and can followed the negative onpremise trend.
Cartons share of juice and nectars fell due to the drop in the category, led by Vino Zupa. Glass share was still
insignificant.
Still drinks were mostly packed in PET, which dropped by 7%. A sharper drop was avoided due to the
aggressive pricing of young brands (Na Eks and Pehar) together with La Vitas good performance in 2010.
Carton gained popularity, since Rauch launched Limmesa last year.

PDF Editor

Market Valuation & Pricing


Pricing followed local currency devaluation
Prices mirrored the slow devaluation of the Dinar. However, timing for raising prices became strategic and a
competitive decision, for all producers.
Imported brands continued to lead the price hike. However, heavy price promotions slowed price increases in
large modern retailers compared with the currency trend. Price wars in packaged water and still drinks in Q310 temporarily jeopardized the producers margin.
Consumers moved away from expensive, premium products and looked for the lowest price level. After years
of Private Label lines with the tendency to offer the cheapest products on the shelf, the situation changed
slightly in 2010 with more aggressive pricing strategies.

Distribution Trends
Belgium Delhaize Group acquired Delta Maxi for 933 m
On-premise sales fell 8%, while the off-premise grew slightly. Large modern retail continued to take share from
the traditional trade.
After a poor 2009, the off-premise market achieved modest growth, driven by price aggressiveness, mostly on
multi pack promotions in large modern retailers (Hypers and Cash&Carry). Traditional trade suffered since
most producers could not maintain the minimum recommended going price policy.
Delta Holding, the biggest privately owned company in Serbia, sold Delta Maxi, its retail food chain and
Serbias biggest off-premise channel with over 450 stores, to Belgian company Delhaize for 933 m, including
debt of 300 m, in March 2011. Expecting to see more focus on Private Label lines, most producers are
concerned about their shelf positions.
EDA/Horeca remained the favourite socialising location. The economic crisis and job uncertainty switched
consumer spending habits to cheaper alternatives like packaged water and coffee, at the expense of other soft
drinks.
Although normally a stable market, kiosks could not resist the downturn in 2010 and the slow recovery is
expected to continue into 2011.
To reflect a more modern lifestyle of the average Serbian consumer, QSRs opened throughout large cities
and are expected to do well in 2011.

PDF Editor

BRANDED PRODUCTS

LARGE RETAILER

SMALL RETAILER

AWAY FROM HOME

PACKAGED WATER PRICING STRUCTURE ESTIMATE


Brand owner's selling price
Wholesale margin
Cost to retailer/away from home
Retailer/away from home - margin
Selling price excluding VAT
VAT [1] (18%)
Average price to consumer

100
6
106
12
118
21,2
139,2

100
10
110
20
130
23,4
153,4

100
10
110
165
275
49,5
324,5

CARBONATES PRICING STRUCTURE ESTIMATE


Brand owner's selling price
Wholesale margin
Cost to retailer/away from home
Retailer/away from home - margin
Selling price excluding VAT
VAT [1] (18%)
Average price to consumer

100
6
106
12
118
21,2
139,2

100
10
110
20
130
23,4
153,4

100
10
110
150
260
46,8
306,8

JUICE & NECTARS PRICING STRUCTURE ESTIMATE


Brand owner's selling price
Wholesale margin
Cost to retailer/away from home
Retailer/away from home - margin
Selling price excluding VAT
VAT [1] (18%)
Average price to consumer

100
6
106
12
118
21,2
139,2

100
10
110
20
130
23,4
153,4

100
10
110
150
260
46,8
306,8

STILL DRINKS PRICING STRUCTURE ESTIMATE


Brand owner's selling price
Wholesale margin
Cost to retailer/away from home
Retailer/away from home - margin
Selling price excluding VAT
VAT [1] (18%)
Average price to consumer

100
6
106
12
118
21,2
139,2

100
10
110
20
130
23,4
153,4

100
10
110
150
260
46,8
306,8

Note:
[1] VAT rate = 18%
SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

212.4

215.6

248.8

271.8

280.1

349.0

368.0

384.7

391.0

368.6

365.0

374.4

Total Soft Drinks

66.7

77.2

94.9

114.9

122.1

154.9

168.7

187.2

196.5

186.3

186.7

192.9

- Packaged Water

30.2

32.3

39.4

46.1

48.4

63.9

71.3

79.8

78.8

77.1

78.7

80.7

- Carbonates

27.1

32.7

39.3

47.1

48.2

53.2

56.5

61.5

66.3

59.3

60.6

62.3

- Nectars

4.3

6.3

8.6

10.7

12.9

18.3

19.4

20.4

23.3

21.7

18.8

19.6

- Still Drinks

1.2

1.3

2.3

4.8

5.9

9.8

10.7

13.4

14.7

14.7

13.9

14.6

- Squash/Syrups

2.0

2.0

2.1

2.4

2.5

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

4.0

4.3

- Juice

1.0

1.7

2.2

2.3

2.5

3.5

3.8

4.1

4.2

3.6

3.5

3.7

- Fruit Powders

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.6

1.1

1.5

2.0

2.4

2.5

2.7

2.7

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.4

2.0

2.6

2.7

- Energy Drinks

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.5

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

2.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Total

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

67.1

58.3

60.4

63.0

64.9

82.6

89.4

88.8

85.5

75.6

71.4

72.8

- Beer

57.4

48.7

50.8

53.4

55.8

72.3

79.4

79.0

76.2

66.4

62.1

63.6

- Wine Total

6.8

6.8

6.9

6.9

6.6

7.4

7.2

7.0

6.9

6.9

7.1

7.0

- Spirits excluding FABs


& Fort Wine

2.8

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.4

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.1

- Fortified Wine

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

Total Hot Beverages

40.7

41.2

42.1

42.6

43.4

53.2

52.2

51.7

50.8

51.4

52.2

52.8

- Hot Coffee

29.1

29.4

30.2

30.8

31.4

38.2

37.1

36.5

35.3

35.2

35.4

35.7

- Hot Tea

11.5

11.8

11.9

11.9

12.1

15.0

15.0

15.1

15.5

16.2

16.8

17.2

Total Dairy Drinks

38.0

38.9

51.3

51.3

49.6

58.2

57.8

57.1

58.2

55.3

54.7

55.8

- White Milk

25.7

26.2

38.0

37.0

34.4

38.0

36.7

35.2

35.5

33.6

32.2

33.1

12.5

13.3

13.8

18.2

18.8

19.4

20.1

19.2

20.2

20.5

0.8

1.1

1.4

1.9

2.1

2.2

2.4

2.3

2.1

2.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

0.3

0.5

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

11.9

12.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

212.4

215.7

249.0

272.1

280.8

350.4

370.0

387.3

394.6

372.4

369.6

380.1

Total Soft Drinks

66.7

77.2

95.2

115.2

122.8

156.3

170.7

189.8

200.1

190.0

191.3

198.6

- Packaged Water

30.2

32.3

39.4

46.1

48.4

63.9

71.3

79.8

78.8

77.1

78.7

80.7

- Carbonates

27.1

32.7

39.3

47.1

48.2

53.2

56.5

61.5

66.3

59.3

60.6

62.3

- Nectars

4.3

6.3

8.6

10.7

12.9

18.3

19.4

20.4

23.3

21.7

18.8

19.6

- Still Drinks

1.2

1.3

2.3

4.8

5.9

9.8

10.7

13.4

14.7

14.7

13.9

14.6

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.7

1.4

2.0

2.6

3.6

3.8

4.6

5.7

Total

- Bulk/HOD Water
- Squash/Syrups

2.0

2.0

2.1

2.4

2.5

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

4.0

4.3

- Juice

1.0

1.7

2.2

2.3

2.5

3.5

3.8

4.1

4.2

3.6

3.5

3.7

- Fruit Powders

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.6

1.1

1.5

2.0

2.4

2.5

2.7

2.7

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.4

2.0

2.6

2.7

- Energy Drinks

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.5

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

2.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

67.1

58.3

60.4

63.0

64.9

82.6

89.4

88.8

85.5

75.6

71.4

72.8

- Beer

57.4

48.7

50.8

53.4

55.8

72.3

79.4

79.0

76.2

66.4

62.1

63.6

- Wine Total

6.8

6.8

6.9

6.9

6.6

7.4

7.2

7.0

6.9

6.9

7.1

7.0

- Spirits excluding FABs


& Fort Wine

2.8

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.4

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.1

- Fortified Wine

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

Total Hot Beverages

40.7

41.2

42.1

42.6

43.4

53.2

52.2

51.7

50.8

51.4

52.2

52.8

- Hot Coffee

29.1

29.4

30.2

30.8

31.4

38.2

37.1

36.5

35.3

35.2

35.4

35.7

- Hot Tea

11.5

11.8

11.9

11.9

12.1

15.0

15.0

15.1

15.5

16.2

16.8

17.2

Total Dairy Drinks

38.0

38.9

51.3

51.3

49.6

58.2

57.8

57.1

58.2

55.3

54.7

55.8

- White Milk

25.7

26.2

38.0

37.0

34.4

38.0

36.7

35.2

35.5

33.6

32.2

33.1

12.5

13.3

13.8

18.2

18.8

19.4

20.1

19.2

20.2

20.5

0.8

1.1

1.4

1.9

2.1

2.2

2.4

2.3

2.1

2.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

0.3

0.5

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

11.9

12.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000
Total

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %

Total Soft Drinks

31.4 %

35.8 %

38.1 %

42.3 %

43.6 %

44.4 %

45.8 %

48.7 %

50.2 %

50.5 %

51.2 %

51.5 %

- Packaged Water

14.2 %

15.0 %

15.9 %

17.0 %

17.3 %

18.3 %

19.4 %

20.7 %

20.2 %

20.9 %

21.6 %

21.6 %

- Carbonates

12.8 %

15.2 %

15.8 %

17.3 %

17.2 %

15.2 %

15.4 %

16.0 %

16.9 %

16.1 %

16.6 %

16.7 %

- Nectars

2.0 %

2.9 %

3.5 %

3.9 %

4.6 %

5.2 %

5.3 %

5.3 %

6.0 %

5.9 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

- Still Drinks

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

2.8 %

2.9 %

3.5 %

3.8 %

4.0 %

3.8 %

3.9 %

- Squash/Syrups

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.2 %

- Juice

0.5 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- Fruit Powders

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Energy Drinks

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

31.6 %

27.1 %

24.3 %

23.2 %

23.2 %

23.7 %

24.3 %

23.1 %

21.9 %

20.5 %

19.6 %

19.4 %

- Beer

27.0 %

22.6 %

20.4 %

19.6 %

19.9 %

20.7 %

21.6 %

20.5 %

19.5 %

18.0 %

17.0 %

17.0 %

- Wine Total

3.2 %

3.2 %

2.8 %

2.5 %

2.4 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

- Spirits excluding FABs


& Fort Wine

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Fortified Wine

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Hot Beverages

19.1 %

19.1 %

16.9 %

15.7 %

15.5 %

15.3 %

14.2 %

13.4 %

13.0 %

13.9 %

14.3 %

14.1 %

- Hot Coffee

13.7 %

13.6 %

12.1 %

11.3 %

11.2 %

11.0 %

10.1 %

9.5 %

9.0 %

9.5 %

9.7 %

9.5 %

5.4 %

5.5 %

4.8 %

4.4 %

4.3 %

4.3 %

4.1 %

3.9 %

4.0 %

4.4 %

4.6 %

4.6 %

Total Dairy Drinks

17.9 %

18.0 %

20.6 %

18.9 %

17.7 %

16.7 %

15.7 %

14.8 %

14.9 %

15.0 %

15.0 %

14.9 %

- White Milk

12.1 %

12.2 %

15.3 %

13.6 %

12.3 %

10.9 %

10.0 %

9.2 %

9.1 %

9.1 %

8.8 %

8.9 %

5.0 %

4.9 %

4.9 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

5.1 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

5.5 %

5.5 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Hot Tea

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

0.1 %

0.2 %

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

5.6 %

5.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000
Total

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %

Total Soft Drinks

31.4 %

35.8 %

38.2 %

42.3 %

43.7 %

44.6 %

46.1 %

49.0 %

50.7 %

51.0 %

51.8 %

52.3 %

- Packaged Water

14.2 %

15.0 %

15.8 %

17.0 %

17.2 %

18.2 %

19.3 %

20.6 %

20.0 %

20.7 %

21.3 %

21.2 %

- Carbonates

12.8 %

15.2 %

15.8 %

17.3 %

17.2 %

15.2 %

15.3 %

15.9 %

16.8 %

15.9 %

16.4 %

16.4 %

- Nectars

2.0 %

2.9 %

3.4 %

3.9 %

4.6 %

5.2 %

5.2 %

5.3 %

5.9 %

5.8 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

- Still Drinks

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

2.8 %

2.9 %

3.5 %

3.7 %

3.9 %

3.8 %

3.8 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.2 %

1.5 %

- Bulk/HOD Water
- Squash/Syrups

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

- Juice

0.5 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- Fruit Powders

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Energy Drinks

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

31.6 %

27.0 %

24.3 %

23.1 %

23.1 %

23.6 %

24.2 %

22.9 %

21.7 %

20.3 %

19.3 %

19.1 %

- Beer

27.0 %

22.6 %

20.4 %

19.6 %

19.9 %

20.6 %

21.5 %

20.4 %

19.3 %

17.8 %

16.8 %

16.7 %

- Wine Total

3.2 %

3.2 %

2.8 %

2.5 %

2.4 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

- Spirits excluding FABs


& Fort Wine

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Fortified Wine

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Hot Beverages

19.1 %

19.1 %

16.9 %

15.7 %

15.5 %

15.2 %

14.1 %

13.3 %

12.9 %

13.8 %

14.1 %

13.9 %

- Hot Coffee

13.7 %

13.6 %

12.1 %

11.3 %

11.2 %

10.9 %

10.0 %

9.4 %

9.0 %

9.5 %

9.6 %

9.4 %

5.4 %

5.5 %

4.8 %

4.4 %

4.3 %

4.3 %

4.1 %

3.9 %

3.9 %

4.3 %

4.5 %

4.5 %

Total Dairy Drinks

17.9 %

18.0 %

20.6 %

18.8 %

17.7 %

16.6 %

15.6 %

14.7 %

14.7 %

14.9 %

14.8 %

14.7 %

- White Milk

12.1 %

12.2 %

15.3 %

13.6 %

12.2 %

10.9 %

9.9 %

9.1 %

9.0 %

9.0 %

8.7 %

8.7 %

5.0 %

4.9 %

4.9 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

5.0 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

5.5 %

5.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Hot Tea

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

0.1 %

0.2 %

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

5.6 %

5.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11F

Total

1.5 %

9.6 %

9.3 %

3.0 %

24.6 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

1.6 %

-5.7 %

-1.0 %

2.6 %

Total Hot Beverages

1.4 %

2.1 %

1.3 %

1.8 %

22.6 %

-2.0 %

-1.0 %

-1.7 %

1.2 %

1.6 %

1.2 %

- Hot Tea

2.5 %

0.8 %

-0.1 %

1.6 %

24.4 %

0.1 %

0.7 %

2.2 %

4.8 %

3.8 %

2.2 %

- Hot Coffee

0.9 %

2.6 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

21.9 %

-2.8 %

-1.6 %

-3.3 %

-0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

15.7 %

23.0 %

21.1 %

6.3 %

26.9 %

8.9 %

11.0 %

5.0 %

-5.2 %

0.2 %

3.3 %

0.0 %

1.6 % 1,186 %

-18.5 %

-6.8 %

-28.3 %

11.0 %

36.7 %

17.1 %

47.7 %

19.1 %

-26.3 %

-13.3 % 266.1 %

Total Soft Drinks


- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

16.3 %

77.0 %

16.9 %

5.9 %

43.1 %

45.5 %

29.4 %

5.1 %

- Squash/Syrups

0.2 %

6.3 %

15.1 %

1.9 %

31.5 %

2.0 %

3.0 %

3.0 %

0.5 %

13.2 %

7.9 %

- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

33.9 %

25.5 %

7.5 %

-25.2 %

10.3 %

13.5 %

117.3 % 279.0 %

95.6 %

40.4 %

77.0 %

25.5 %

22.0 %

12.0 %

2.6 %

7.1 %

8.6 %

- Energy Drinks
- Fruit Powders

-0.9 %

-3.3 %

-15.0 %

8.8 %

81.6 %

35.3 %

31.0 %

19.9 %

3.2 %

6.8 %

2.3 %

- Carbonates

20.6 %

20.1 %

20.1 %

2.3 %

10.3 %

6.2 %

8.8 %

7.8 %

-10.5 %

2.3 %

2.8 %

7.0 %

22.2 %

17.0 %

4.9 %

32.0 %

11.6 %

11.8 %

-1.2 %

-2.1 %

2.0 %

2.6 %

67.4 %

29.7 %

0.7 %

11.2 %

38.9 %

8.1 %

9.1 %

3.3 %

-14.0 %

-3.3 %

6.3 %

75.5 % 110.8 %

23.3 %

65.7 %

8.9 %

25.7 %

9.8 %

-0.4 %

-5.2 %

4.7 %

47.9 %

36.4 %

24.5 %

20.3 %

42.5 %

5.6 %

5.6 %

14.2 %

-7.0 %

-13.5 %

4.4 %

Total Dairy Drinks

2.4 %

-0.2 %

-0.1 %

-3.4 %

17.4 %

-0.8 %

-1.3 %

2.0 %

-4.9 %

-1.1 %

2.1 %

- Soymilk

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

53.3 %

17.1 %

29.1 %

11.6 %

-1.0 %

5.3 %

3.8 %

- Drinking Yogurt

0.0 %

0.0 %

5.9 %

3.9 %

31.9 %

3.5 %

3.3 %

3.2 %

-4.1 %

4.9 %

1.3 %

- Fermented Milk

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

300.2 %

24.9 %

19.6 %

3.2 %

3.9 %

- Cultured Dairy Drinks

2.0 % -100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- White Milk

1.8 %

44.9 %

-2.7 %

-7.0 %

10.7 %

-3.4 %

-4.1 %

0.8 %

-5.3 %

-4.2 %

2.9 %

- Flavoured Milk

66.6 %

58.5 %

28.0 %

33.9 %

36.3 %

10.2 %

5.5 %

8.8 %

-7.2 %

-7.7 %

-1.9 %

Total Alcoholic Drinks

-13.1 %

3.6 %

4.2 %

3.1 %

27.2 %

8.2 %

-0.6 %

-3.7 %

-11.6 %

-5.6 %

1.9 %

- Wine Total

-0.1 %

1.1 %

-0.1 %

-4.1 %

12.7 %

-2.8 %

-2.9 %

-1.6 %

-0.6 %

2.6 %

-0.7 %

- Spirits excluding FABs &


Fort Wine

-1.5 %

-2.2 %

-2.4 %

-8.4 %

14.3 %

-2.9 %

0.0 %

-10.7 %

-5.1 %

-4.5 %

-2.3 %

-15.2 %

4.3 %

5.1 %

4.6 %

29.6 %

9.8 %

-0.4 %

-3.6 %

-12.8 %

-6.5 %

2.4 %

-0.1 %

1.6 %

-0.1 %

-0.1 %

-0.1 %

-14.3 %

-16.6 %

29.4 %

-12.0 %

-18.0 %

-5.5 %

- Packaged Water
- Juice
- Still Drinks
- Nectars

- Beer
- Fortified Wine

4.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11F

Total

1.5 %

9.7 %

9.3 %

3.2 %

24.8 %

5.6 %

4.7 %

1.9 %

-5.6 %

-0.7 %

2.8 %

Total Hot Beverages

1.4 %

2.1 %

1.3 %

1.8 %

22.6 %

-2.0 %

-1.0 %

-1.7 %

1.2 %

1.6 %

1.2 %

- Hot Tea

2.5 %

0.8 %

-0.1 %

1.6 %

24.4 %

0.1 %

0.7 %

2.2 %

4.8 %

3.8 %

2.2 %

- Hot Coffee

0.9 %

2.6 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

21.9 %

-2.8 %

-1.6 %

-3.3 %

-0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

15.7 %

23.2 %

21.1 %

6.6 %

27.3 %

9.2 %

11.2 %

5.5 %

-5.0 %

0.7 %

3.8 %

1.6 % 1,186 %

-18.5 %

-6.8 %

-28.3 %

11.0 %

36.7 %

17.1 %

47.7 %

19.1 %

-13.3 % 266.1 %

Total Soft Drinks


- Sports Drinks

0.0 %

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

-26.3 %

16.3 %

77.0 %

16.9 %

5.9 %

43.1 %

45.5 %

29.4 %

5.1 %

29.0 % 125.6 %

89.4 %

45.9 %

28.0 %

39.2 %

3.6 %

22.8 %

24.2 %

6.3 %

15.1 %

1.9 %

31.5 %

2.0 %

3.0 %

3.0 %

0.5 %

13.2 %

7.9 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

33.9 %

25.5 %

7.5 %

-25.2 %

10.3 %

13.5 %

- Energy Drinks

117.3 %

279.0 %

95.6 %

40.4 %

77.0 %

25.5 %

22.0 %

12.0 %

2.6 %

7.1 %

8.6 %

- Fruit Powders

-0.9 %

-3.3 %

-15.0 %

8.8 %

81.6 %

35.3 %

31.0 %

19.9 %

3.2 %

6.8 %

2.3 %

- Carbonates

20.6 %

20.1 %

20.1 %

2.3 %

10.3 %

6.2 %

8.8 %

7.8 %

-10.5 %

2.3 %

2.8 %

7.0 %

22.2 %

17.0 %

4.9 %

32.0 %

11.6 %

11.8 %

-1.2 %

-2.1 %

2.0 %

2.6 %

67.4 %

29.7 %

0.7 %

11.2 %

38.9 %

8.1 %

9.1 %

3.3 %

-14.0 %

-3.3 %

6.3 %

75.5 % 110.8 %

23.3 %

65.7 %

8.9 %

25.7 %

9.8 %

-0.4 %

-5.2 %

4.7 %

47.9 %

36.4 %

24.5 %

20.3 %

42.5 %

5.6 %

5.6 %

14.2 %

-7.0 %

-13.5 %

4.4 %

Total Dairy Drinks

2.4 %

-0.2 %

-0.1 %

-3.4 %

17.4 %

-0.8 %

-1.3 %

2.0 %

-4.9 %

-1.1 %

2.1 %

- Soymilk

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

53.3 %

17.1 %

29.1 %

11.6 %

-1.0 %

5.3 %

3.8 %

- Drinking Yogurt

0.0 %

0.0 %

5.9 %

3.9 %

31.9 %

3.5 %

3.3 %

3.2 %

-4.1 %

4.9 %

1.3 %

- Fermented Milk

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

300.2 %

24.9 %

19.6 %

3.2 %

3.9 %

- Cultured Dairy Drinks

2.0 % -100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- White Milk

1.8 %

44.9 %

-2.7 %

-7.0 %

10.7 %

-3.4 %

-4.1 %

0.8 %

-5.3 %

-4.2 %

2.9 %

- Flavoured Milk

66.6 %

58.5 %

28.0 %

33.9 %

36.3 %

10.2 %

5.5 %

8.8 %

-7.2 %

-7.7 %

-1.9 %

Total Alcoholic Drinks

-13.1 %

3.6 %

4.2 %

3.1 %

27.2 %

8.2 %

-0.6 %

-3.7 %

-11.6 %

-5.6 %

1.9 %

- Bulk/HOD Water

0.0 %

170.9 %

- Squash/Syrups

0.2 %

- Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks

- Packaged Water
- Juice
- Still Drinks

4.1 %

- Nectars

- Wine Total

-0.1 %

1.1 %

-0.1 %

-4.1 %

12.7 %

-2.8 %

-2.9 %

-1.6 %

-0.6 %

2.6 %

-0.7 %

- Spirits excluding FABs &


Fort Wine

-1.5 %

-2.2 %

-2.4 %

-8.4 %

14.3 %

-2.9 %

0.0 %

-10.7 %

-5.1 %

-4.5 %

-2.3 %

-15.2 %

4.3 %

5.1 %

4.6 %

29.6 %

9.8 %

-0.4 %

-3.6 %

-12.8 %

-6.5 %

2.4 %

-0.1 %

1.6 %

-0.1 %

-0.1 %

-0.1 %

-14.3 %

-16.6 %

29.4 %

-12.0 %

-18.0 %

-5.5 %

- Beer
- Fortified Wine

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2045.7

2077.3

2359.4

2581.1

2662.0

2597.1

2727.5

2839.6

2874.0

2709.4

2676.2

2720.2

Total Soft Drinks

642.1

743.5

900.1

1091.1

1160.5

1152.9

1250.1

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

1401.7

- Packaged Water

290.6

311.1

374.1

438.2

460.2

475.6

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

- Carbonates

260.9

314.9

372.3

447.5

458.4

396.0

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

- Nectars

41.0

60.7

81.4

101.5

122.2

136.3

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

- Still Drinks

12.0

12.5

21.6

45.6

56.2

72.9

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

- Squash/Syrups

19.2

19.2

20.1

23.2

23.6

24.3

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

- Juice

9.9

16.6

21.2

21.4

23.8

25.9

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

- Fruit Powders

6.8

6.7

6.4

5.5

5.9

8.5

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

1.5

1.1

1.0

3.6

4.2

5.8

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

- Energy Drinks

0.2

0.5

1.9

3.7

5.1

7.1

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

0.1

0.1

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Total

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee
Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

646.4

562.1

573.3

598.0

617.2

614.8

662.5

655.6

628.8

555.8

523.3

528.7

- Beer

552.8

468.9

481.4

506.7

530.6

538.2

588.4

583.4

559.8

488.1

455.3

462.0

- Wine Total

65.7

65.7

65.4

65.4

62.8

55.4

53.6

51.9

50.8

50.5

51.7

50.9

- Spirits excluding
FABs & Fort Wine

27.2

26.8

25.8

25.2

23.1

20.7

20.0

19.9

17.7

16.8

16.0

15.5

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3

Total Hot Beverages

391.6

397.2

399.2

405.0

412.8

396.1

386.6

381.3

373.4

377.7

382.9

383.9

- Hot Coffee

280.7

283.5

286.4

292.2

298.1

284.4

275.3

269.7

259.8

258.7

259.7

259.1

- Hot Tea

110.9

113.7

112.8

112.8

114.7

111.7

111.3

111.6

113.6

119.0

123.2

124.8

Total Dairy Drinks

365.6

374.5

486.8

487.0

471.5

433.3

428.3

421.2

427.7

406.6

401.0

405.8

- White Milk

248.0

252.6

360.2

351.0

326.6

283.0

272.3

260.0

261.1

247.1

236.2

240.8

118.8

126.0

131.0

135.3

139.5

143.5

147.4

141.4

148.0

148.6

7.8

10.0

13.4

14.3

15.7

16.5

17.9

16.6

15.3

14.8

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.5

- Fortified Wine

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

3.0

5.0

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

114.6

116.9

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2045.7

2078.2

2361.8

2584.2

2669.0

2607.5

2742.6

2858.8

2900.7

2737.0

2710.0

2761.8

Total Soft Drinks

642.1

744.4

902.5

1094.2

1167.5

1163.3

1265.2

1400.7

1470.8

1396.8

1402.7

1443.3

- Packaged Water

290.6

311.1

374.1

438.2

460.2

475.6

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

- Carbonates

260.9

314.9

372.3

447.5

458.4

396.0

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

- Nectars

41.0

60.7

81.4

101.5

122.2

136.3

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

- Still Drinks

12.0

12.5

21.6

45.6

56.2

72.9

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

0.9

2.4

3.1

7.0

10.4

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

Total

- Bulk/HOD Water
- Squash/Syrups

19.2

19.2

20.1

23.2

23.6

24.3

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

- Juice

9.9

16.6

21.2

21.4

23.8

25.9

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

- Fruit Powders

6.8

6.7

6.4

5.5

5.9

8.5

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

1.5

1.1

1.0

3.6

4.2

5.8

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

- Energy Drinks

0.2

0.5

1.9

3.7

5.1

7.1

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

0.1

0.1

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

- Sports Drinks
- Iced/RTD Coffee
Drinks
Total Alcoholic Drinks

646.4

562.1

573.3

598.0

617.2

614.8

662.5

655.6

628.8

555.8

523.3

528.7

- Beer

552.8

468.9

481.4

506.7

530.6

538.2

588.4

583.4

559.8

488.1

455.3

462.0

- Wine Total

65.7

65.7

65.4

65.4

62.8

55.4

53.6

51.9

50.8

50.5

51.7

50.9

- Spirits excluding
FABs & Fort Wine

27.2

26.8

25.8

25.2

23.1

20.7

20.0

19.9

17.7

16.8

16.0

15.5

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3

Total Hot Beverages

391.6

397.2

399.2

405.0

412.8

396.1

386.6

381.3

373.4

377.7

382.9

383.9

- Hot Coffee

280.7

283.5

286.4

292.2

298.1

284.4

275.3

269.7

259.8

258.7

259.7

259.1

- Hot Tea

110.9

113.7

112.8

112.8

114.7

111.7

111.3

111.6

113.6

119.0

123.2

124.8

Total Dairy Drinks

365.6

374.5

486.8

487.0

471.5

433.3

428.3

421.2

427.7

406.6

401.0

405.8

- White Milk

248.0

252.6

360.2

351.0

326.6

283.0

272.3

260.0

261.1

247.1

236.2

240.8

118.8

126.0

131.0

135.3

139.5

143.5

147.4

141.4

148.0

148.6

7.8

10.0

13.4

14.3

15.7

16.5

17.9

16.6

15.3

14.8

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.5

- Fortified Wine

- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk

3.0

5.0

- Soymilk
- Fermented Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks

114.6

116.9

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

642.1

743.5

900.1

1091.1

1160.5

1152.9

1250.1

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

1401.7

338.4

353.0

417.8

485.0

506.6

541.9

586.7

654.9

645.5

626.1

632.1

647.0

- Imports

5.1

4.4

6.5

8.1

6.8

8.2

4.4

9.4

9.0

9.1

7.1

4.5

- Exports

52.9

46.3

50.1

54.8

53.2

74.5

62.4

75.6

75.0

68.1

62.4

65.0

290.6

311.1

374.1

438.2

460.2

475.6

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

265.8

311.0

371.0

459.6

467.1

468.6

500.5

553.8

601.7

522.1

508.1

512.4

- Imports

3.9

10.1

9.3

13.8

4.6

2.7

2.2

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

- Exports

8.8

6.2

8.0

25.8

13.3

75.3

83.9

100.5

115.1

86.4

63.7

59.4

260.9

314.9

372.3

447.5

458.4

396.0

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

Total
Packaged Water
- Production

- Consumption
Carbonates
- Production

- Consumption
Nectars
- Production

39.7

59.1

79.4

100.1

135.2

151.3

169.2

202.7

239.3

207.6

180.6

186.5

- Imports

1.3

1.6

2.0

2.2

3.5

3.9

3.3

2.5

2.0

1.3

1.0

1.1

- Exports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

16.5

18.8

29.1

54.4

69.8

49.5

44.1

45.2

41.0

60.7

81.4

101.5

122.2

136.3

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

12.0

12.5

19.5

45.0

55.7

72.0

78.1

97.9

121.1

120.5

114.7

118.8

0.0

0.0

2.1

0.6

0.5

1.1

1.7

2.3

1.9

1.4

1.3

1.3

- Consumption
Still Drinks
- Production
- Imports
- Exports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.7

1.2

14.7

14.1

14.0

14.2

12.0

12.5

21.6

45.6

56.2

72.9

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

19.3

18.0

19.8

22.6

23.5

24.0

24.4

25.0

25.5

26.7

30.3

32.6

- Imports

0.0

1.4

0.6

0.8

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

- Exports

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.3

1.5

1.7

19.2

19.2

20.1

23.2

23.6

24.3

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

- Production

9.9

16.6

21.2

23.6

33.2

34.9

46.1

50.6

53.7

39.9

36.8

38.8

- Imports

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

- Exports

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.3

10.4

9.5

18.3

20.6

22.8

13.3

11.1

11.7

- Consumption

9.9

16.6

21.2

21.4

23.8

25.9

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

- Production

3.1

3.0

4.8

3.8

2.6

2.2

3.2

4.7

6.8

3.8

0.2

1.3

- Imports

3.7

3.8

3.6

2.8

4.1

6.8

8.6

10.6

11.2

14.8

19.4

18.5

- Exports

0.0

0.0

1.9

1.1

0.8

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

- Consumption

6.8

6.7

6.4

5.5

5.9

8.5

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

1.7

1.3

0.6

3.1

4.1

5.0

6.4

6.0

9.2

13.6

16.5

17.3

- Consumption
Squash/Syrups
- Production

- Consumption
Juice

Fruit Powders

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks


- Production

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Imports

0.0

0.1

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.4

1.0

1.9

1.9

2.2

3.6

3.8

- Exports

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.7

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.2

1.2

1.4

- Consumption

1.5

1.1

1.0

3.6

4.2

5.8

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

- Production

0.3

0.7

2.5

4.7

5.7

7.4

8.7

10.0

10.5

11.3

12.2

13.2

- Imports

0.0

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.9

1.3

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

- Exports

0.1

0.4

0.9

1.5

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

- Consumption

0.2

0.5

1.9

3.7

5.1

7.1

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

0.1

0.1

0.8

0.8

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.7

0.9

Energy Drinks

Sports Drinks
- Production
- Imports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.5

- Exports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

- Consumption
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
- Production
- Imports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

- Exports

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Consumption
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

2000
Total

2001

2002

2003

2004

100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %

Packaged Water
- Production

52.7 %

47.5 %

46.4 %

44.4 %

43.7 %

47.0 %

46.9 %

47.4 %

44.7 %

45.7 %

46.2 %

46.2 %

- Imports

0.8 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

- Exports

8.2 %

6.2 %

5.6 %

5.0 %

4.6 %

6.5 %

5.0 %

5.5 %

5.2 %

5.0 %

4.6 %

4.6 %

45.3 %

41.8 %

41.6 %

40.2 %

39.7 %

41.2 %

42.3 %

42.6 %

40.1 %

41.4 %

42.1 %

41.8 %

- Consumption
Carbonates
- Production

41.4 %

41.8 %

41.2 %

42.1 %

40.3 %

40.6 %

40.0 %

40.1 %

41.7 %

38.1 %

37.1 %

36.6 %

- Imports

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.0 %

1.3 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

1.4 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

2.4 %

1.1 %

6.5 %

6.7 %

7.3 %

8.0 %

6.3 %

4.7 %

4.2 %

40.6 %

42.4 %

41.4 %

41.0 %

39.5 %

34.3 %

33.5 %

32.9 %

33.7 %

31.8 %

32.5 %

32.3 %

- Production

6.2 %

7.9 %

8.8 %

9.2 %

11.6 %

13.1 %

13.5 %

14.7 %

16.6 %

15.2 %

13.2 %

13.3 %

- Imports

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

2.3 %

3.9 %

4.8 %

3.6 %

3.2 %

3.2 %

- Consumption

6.4 %

8.2 %

9.0 %

9.3 %

10.5 %

11.8 %

11.5 %

10.9 %

11.9 %

11.6 %

10.0 %

10.2 %

- Consumption
Nectars

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Production

1.9 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

4.1 %

4.8 %

6.2 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

8.4 %

8.8 %

8.4 %

8.5 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- Consumption

1.9 %

1.7 %

2.4 %

4.2 %

4.8 %

6.3 %

6.3 %

7.2 %

7.5 %

7.9 %

7.5 %

7.6 %

- Production

3.0 %

2.4 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

2.0 %

2.2 %

2.3 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Consumption

3.0 %

2.6 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

2.1 %

2.0 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

2.2 %

2.3 %

- Production

1.5 %

2.2 %

2.4 %

2.2 %

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.7 %

3.7 %

3.7 %

2.9 %

2.7 %

2.8 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

1.6 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Consumption

1.5 %

2.2 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

2.0 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

2.0 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

- Production

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

- Imports

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Consumption

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.2 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

- Production

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

1.0 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Consumption

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

- Production

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Consumption

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Still Drinks

Squash/Syrups

Juice

Fruit Powders

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

Energy Drinks

Sports Drinks
- Production
- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Consumption
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks
- Production
- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

PDF Editor

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

- Consumption

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

15.8 %

21.1 %

21.2 %

6.4 %

-0.7 %

8.4 %

10.5 %

4.5 %

-5.2 %

0.0 %

2.4 %

4.3 %

18.3 %

16.1 %

4.5 %

7.0 %

8.3 %

11.6 %

-1.4 %

-3.0 %

1.0 %

2.4 %

- Imports

-13.8 %

48.3 %

24.7 % -16.1 %

21.3 % -47.0 % 116.8 %

-4.7 %

1.6 % -22.1 % -36.2 %

- Exports

-12.5 %

8.2 %

9.4 %

-3.0 %

40.2 % -16.3 %

21.2 %

-0.8 %

-9.2 %

-8.4 %

4.1 %

7.1 %

20.3 %

17.1 %

5.0 %

3.3 %

11.2 %

11.4 %

-1.6 %

-2.1 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

17.0 %

19.3 %

23.9 %

1.6 %

0.3 %

6.8 %

10.6 %

8.7 % -13.2 %

-2.7 %

0.8 %

- Imports

159.0 %

-8.0 %

48.0 % -66.7 % -41.0 % -18.5 % -68.2 % -28.6 % -100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

-29.3 %

27.6 % 224.1 % -48.5 % 466.8 %

14.6 % -24.9 % -26.3 %

-6.8 %

- Consumption

20.7 %

18.2 %

20.2 %

- Production

48.8 %

34.5 %

26.0 %

35.0 %

11.9 %

- Imports

23.1 %

25.0 %

12.0 %

57.8 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

14.2 %

54.2 %

87.4 %

28.1 % -29.1 % -10.8 %

2.4 %

48.0 %

34.2 %

Total
Packaged Water
- Production

- Consumption
Carbonates
- Production

2.4 % -13.6 %

11.3 %

19.8 %

5.8 %

8.4 %

11.8 %

19.8 %

7.3 % -10.5 %

2.0 %

1.9 %

18.0 % -13.2 % -13.0 %

3.2 %

10.4 % -15.4 % -24.2 % -20.0 % -35.0 % -23.1 %

5.0 %

Nectars

- Consumption

0.0 % 1,886 %
24.7 %

20.4 %

11.5 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

13.7 %

-7.0 % -13.8 %

3.5 %

55.7 % 130.9 %

23.9 %

29.3 %

8.4 %

25.3 %

23.7 %

-0.4 %

-4.8 %

3.5 %

0.0 % -71.7 % -16.7 % 120.0 %

54.5 %

36.9 % -17.7 % -28.3 %

-6.7 %

-1.7 %

Still Drinks
- Production

4.2 %

- Imports

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

67.4 % 1,151 %

-4.2 %

-0.3 %

1.3 %

- Consumption

4.2 %

72.7 % 111.0 %

23.4 %

29.7 %

8.5 %

25.2 %

9.4 %

-0.4 %

-5.4 %

3.8 %

- Production

-6.9 %

10.0 %

4.0 %

2.2 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

2.2 %

4.8 %

13.4 %

7.6 %

- Imports

0.0 % -59.1 %

6.0 % -11.3 %

23.4 %

20.7 %

2.9 %

-1.4 %

-5.6 %

0.0 %

0.0 % 218.2 %

Squash/Syrups

- Exports
- Consumption

29.1 %

14.4 %

31.9 % -33.9 %

43.9 % -12.3 %

86.9 % -39.4 %

-7.8 %

-7.4 %

0.0 % 560.0 %

14.4 %

14.6 %

0.2 %

4.6 %

15.2 %

2.0 %

2.9 %

1.6 %

2.6 %

2.6 %

0.5 %

12.9 %

6.9 %

67.5 %

27.7 %

11.6 %

40.4 %

5.1 %

32.0 %

9.8 %

6.0 % -25.7 %

-7.8 %

5.3 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

8.7 % -12.0 % -16.7 %

-6.1 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 % 214.6 %

-9.1 %

93.2 %

12.3 %

10.6 % -41.4 % -16.5 %

5.1 %

67.5 %

27.7 %

0.8 %

8.7 %

7.7 %

8.7 %

-2.6 %

59.2 % -20.8 % -30.5 % -17.9 %

50.7 %

45.2 %

Juice
- Production

- Consumption

-4.3 % -57.0 % -81.4 % 187.5 %


11.3 %

2.9 % -14.0 %

-3.5 %

5.4 %

Fruit Powders
- Production

PDF Editor

45.0 % -44.0 % -95.3 % 640.3 %

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

- Imports

0.5 %

-5.2 % -21.5 %

47.8 %

65.4 %

26.1 %

22.8 %

6.2 %

31.7 %

31.1 %

-4.4 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 % -42.1 % -27.3 % -35.0 % -13.5 % -11.1 % -25.0 %

-6.7 % -82.1 %

0.0 %

- Consumption

-0.9 %

-4.8 % -14.9 %

8.9 %

42.2 %

34.8 %

30.5 %

19.3 %

3.2 %

6.5 %

1.4 %

-23.5 % -50.8 % 389.2 %

29.4 %

22.4 %

28.7 %

-5.4 %

51.6 %

48.6 %

21.3 %

5.0 %

16.5 %

67.1 % -25.5 %

83.5 %

1.8 %

14.9 %

65.7 %

3.4 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks


- Production
- Imports

0.0 % 360.0 %

53.0 %

- Exports

68.8 % -51.2 % 111.8 % 168.0 % -19.7 %

22.6 %

19.7 %

17.6 %

15.0 %

7.0 %

13.8 %

- Consumption

-26.3 % -14.6 % 266.5 %

16.4 %

38.6 %

16.4 %

5.5 %

42.5 %

45.5 %

29.1 %

4.1 %

128.3 % 259.6 %

89.6 %

21.2 %

30.6 %

17.2 %

15.5 %

5.2 %

7.3 %

8.1 %

8.5 %

51.7 %

18.2 %

1.9 %

60.4 %

52.9 %

51.7 % -24.9 %

-0.7 %

2.0 %

Energy Drinks
- Production
- Imports

0.0 %

16.0 %

- Exports

521.4 % 104.1 %

64.2 % -28.1 % -22.7 % -23.5 % -19.4 % -10.0 %

-6.7 %

16.7 %

12.2 %

- Consumption

117.4 % 273.0 %

95.8 %

2.6 %

6.8 %

7.6 %

40.5 %

38.5 %

25.0 %

21.5 %

11.5 %

0.0 % -59.2 % -87.7 %

-100 %

0.0 % 2,158 %

31.9 %

22.0 %

32.0 %

21.0 %

31.2 % -63.8 %

83.5 %

11.4 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

1,187.5 -18.4 % -27.0 % -28.5 %


%

10.5 %

36.2 %

17.1 %

47.3 %

18.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

33.3 %

25.0 %

7.0 % -25.2 %

10.0 %

12.5 %

Sports Drinks
- Production

0.0 % 850.0 %

- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 % -70.4 % 278.8 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Consumption

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks


- Production
- Imports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Exports

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Consumption

0.0 %

0.0 %

33.3 %

25.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

7.0 % -25.2 %

10.0 %

12.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Average Price

Value

2009

2010

2011F

2009

2010

2011F

2009

2010

2011F

1369.2

1368.9

1401.7

73.25

77.36

81.48

100294.64

105901.28

114216.86

Total Packaged Water

567.1

576.8

586.5

35.45

38.79

42.24

20100.46

22371.85

24774.84

- Off

495.0

513.8

519.9

24.43

28.10

30.92

12095.21

14437.49

16072.84

- On

72.1

63.0

66.7

111.11

125.92

130.52

8005.25

7934.35

8702.00

Total Carbonates

435.7

444.4

453.0

79.18

82.96

86.62

34500.52

36868.96

39238.08

- Off

409.3

417.4

424.7

56.83

59.94

61.95

23259.35

25021.96

26305.88

- On

26.4

27.0

28.4

425.16

438.62

456.16

11241.17

11847.00

12932.20

Total Nectars

159.5

137.6

142.4

159.52

180.18

184.94

25444.00

24793.30

26328.40

- Off

134.9

115.0

118.4

81.92

91.88

93.77

11046.50

10565.80

11098.40

- On

24.7

22.6

24.0

584.08

629.54

634.58

14397.50

14227.50

15230.00

Total

PDF Editor

Million Litres
Total Still Drinks

Average Price

Value

107.9

102.0

105.9

40.27

42.10

46.49

4344.76

4293.59

4921.82

- Off

97.1

92.7

96.9

29.87

33.02

37.01

2899.72

3062.19

3586.10

- On

10.8

9.2

9.0

133.65

133.14

149.08

1445.04

1231.40

1335.72

Total Squash/Syrups

26.1

29.5

31.6

19.55

20.26

20.79

509.99

597.35

655.90

- Off

25.9

29.3

31.5

19.32

20.01

20.67

500.92

586.15

650.10

- On

0.2

0.2

0.1

54.00

56.00

58.00

9.07

11.20

5.80

Total Juice

26.8

25.7

27.2

195.79

211.44

196.25

5242.47

5443.74

5343.90

- Off

22.5

22.0

23.8

118.89

132.82

139.10

2671.54

2918.58

3310.60

4.3

3.8

3.4

597.20

669.45

592.80

2570.93

2525.16

2033.30

Total Iced/RTD Tea


Drinks

- On

14.6

18.9

19.7

173.56

151.48

167.97

2540.90

2859.55

3305.74

- Off

12.1

16.0

16.6

60.00

57.00

64.76

728.40

910.75

1073.74

- On

2.5

2.9

3.1

725.00

672.00

720.00

1812.50

1948.80

2232.00

Total Fruit Powders

18.3

19.6

19.8

75.54

94.39

103.74

1384.58

1850.00

2054.44

- Off

17.6

18.5

18.6

56.70

64.32

69.66

999.58

1190.00

1298.49

- On

0.7

1.1

1.2

550.00

600.00

650.00

385.00

660.00

755.95

12.4

13.1

14.2

485.59

491.69

504.40

5997.00

6441.18

7162.50

- Off

4.4

5.1

6.2

315.00

320.00

340.00

1386.00

1621.51

2091.00

Total Energy Drinks


- On

8.0

8.0

8.1

580.00

600.00

630.00

4611.00

4819.68

5071.50

Total Sports Drinks

0.7

1.2

1.4

245.24

263.13

255.99

181.48

323.65

363.50

- Off

0.4

0.6

0.7

175.00

185.00

185.00

62.13

112.85

129.50

- On

0.4

0.6

0.7

310.00

340.00

325.00

119.35

210.80

234.00

Total Iced/RTD Coffee


Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

606.25

660.45

684.28

48.50

58.12

67.74

- Off

0.1

0.1

0.1

606.25

660.45

684.28

48.50

58.12

67.74

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

448.7

543.7

677.9

805.9

824.4

846.4

962.9

1089.3

1145.9

1074.1

1069.8

Coca-Cola

87.0

112.7

136.0

143.2

127.4

106.2

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

Vrncji

41.5

36.9

44.5

50.8

41.4

39.8

69.0

92.1

99.4

116.2

123.2

4.1

10.4

24.6

52.4

74.2

103.3

123.2

137.3

132.3

108.3

113.9

Knjaz Milos

162.3

178.5

186.0

192.6

158.4

137.2

137.6

135.6

119.2

103.2

92.4

Pepsi-Cola

17.5

30.5

35.9

37.3

31.5

30.4

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

Rosa

13.9

11.7

16.6

31.4

33.0

25.2

31.9

41.8

47.3

50.5

58.8

7.8

16.7

22.5

35.6

45.5

47.9

51.3

Total

Minaqua

Aqua Viva
Frutella

19.1

25.9

40.3

55.9

73.9

85.9

87.0

83.6

77.9

67.2

47.2

Nectar

5.1

5.5

11.8

13.7

17.7

47.9

63.0

63.1

63.4

45.4

43.0

12.7

19.2

33.8

47.1

52.3

42.2

43.8

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

La Vita
Heba

34.3

44.0

52.9

52.6

PDF Editor

48.0

Fanta

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

22.6

36.1

39.8

52.9

51.9

26.3

25.5

29.6

29.6

30.4

34.5

18.1

25.6

30.6

34.3

38.2

40.0

32.5

Hello
Sinalco

14.3

19.9

32.5

43.0

55.0

63.0

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.3

28.1

4.1

2.2

3.2

4.1

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

25.5

Na Eks
Prolom

10.7

12.8

20.0

23.5

24.5

24.5

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

Next

6.5

11.3

20.1

27.7

31.2

19.4

10.9

17.3

18.9

19.7

19.8

Cockta

3.5

2.5

3.8

3.9

3.1

8.3

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

Schweppes

6.4

5.0

9.0

15.1

14.7

11.1

16.6

22.6

21.9

19.9

19.0

7.9

9.4

15.0

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

Aqua Bella
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

1381.5

1444.2

1369.2

1369.0

1401.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

1296.1

1365.0

1296.7

1298.0

1329.4

93.8 %

94.5 %

94.7 %

94.8 %

94.8 %

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Bag in Box
- Board
- Bottle

1078.6

1114.9

1071.2

1091.3

1112.7

78.1 %

77.2 %

78.2 %

79.7 %

79.4 %

- PET

1047.1

1086.8

1050.1

1072.4

1092.8

75.8 %

75.3 %

76.7 %

78.3 %

78.0 %

31.5

28.1

21.1

18.9

19.9

2.3 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

31.9

36.0

31.5

29.3

30.5

2.3 %

2.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

2.2 %

- Metal

31.9

36.0

31.5

29.3

30.5

2.3 %

2.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

2.2 %

- Carton

170.2

196.1

175.8

158.1

166.7

12.3 %

13.6 %

12.8 %

11.5 %

11.9 %

- Board

170.2

196.1

175.8

158.1

166.7

12.3 %

13.6 %

12.8 %

11.5 %

11.9 %

- Pouch

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Foil

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Sachet

13.4

16.0

15.3

10.5

10.6

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Foil

13.4

16.0

15.3

10.5

10.6

1.0 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Tank

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

1.5

1.8

2.0

8.2

8.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

1.1

1.2

1.4

8.2

8.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Glass
- Can

- Metal
- Tub
- HDPE

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Refillable

85.4

79.1

72.5

71.0

72.3

6.2 %

5.5 %

5.3 %

5.2 %

5.2 %

- Bottle

83.4

77.0

70.4

68.5

69.3

6.0 %

5.3 %

5.1 %

5.0 %

4.9 %

- Glass

83.4

77.0

70.4

68.5

69.3

6.0 %

5.3 %

5.1 %

5.0 %

4.9 %

1.9

2.1

2.1

2.5

3.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

1.9

2.1

2.1

2.5

3.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Board

- Tank
- Metal

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

1381.5

1444.2

1369.2

1368.9

1401.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Off

1211.0

1262.8

1219.2

1230.4

1257.2

87.7 %

87.4 %

89.0 %

89.9 %

89.7 %

425.1

456.8

409.3

417.4

424.7

30.8 %

31.6 %

29.9 %

30.5 %

30.3 %

- Energy Drinks

3.6

4.2

4.4

5.1

6.2

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Fruit Powders

14.7

17.2

17.6

18.5

18.6

1.1 %

1.2 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

- Iced/RTD Coffee
Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

5.5

8.0

12.1

16.0

16.6

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

24.5

25.1

22.5

22.0

23.8

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- Nectars

118.7

134.2

134.9

115.0

118.4

8.6 %

9.3 %

9.8 %

8.4 %

8.4 %

- Packaged Water

506.2

496.5

495.0

513.8

519.9

36.6 %

34.4 %

36.2 %

37.5 %

37.1 %

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Squash/Syrups

24.0

24.8

25.9

29.3

31.5

1.7 %

1.7 %

1.9 %

2.1 %

2.2 %

- Still Drinks

88.4

95.6

97.1

92.7

96.9

6.4 %

6.6 %

7.1 %

6.8 %

6.9 %

170.5

181.4

150.0

138.5

144.5

12.3 %

12.6 %

11.0 %

10.1 %

10.3 %

28.9

30.3

26.4

27.0

28.4

2.1 %

2.1 %

1.9 %

2.0 %

2.0 %

- Energy Drinks

7.2

7.9

8.0

8.0

8.1

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Fruit Powders

0.2

0.6

0.7

1.1

1.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

1.5

2.1

2.5

2.9

3.1

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Juice

5.7

6.0

4.3

3.8

3.4

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Nectars

32.1

37.3

24.7

22.6

24.0

2.3 %

2.6 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

- Packaged Water

82.5

83.0

72.1

63.0

66.7

6.0 %

5.7 %

5.3 %

4.6 %

4.8 %

- Sports Drinks

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

- Squash/Syrups

1.4

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

10.6

12.7

10.8

9.2

9.0

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

- Carbonates

- Juice

- Sports Drinks

Total On
- Carbonates

- Still Drinks

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2007

2008

2009

% Share
2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1250.1

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Packaged Water Plain

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

42.3 %

42.6 %

40.1 %

41.4 %

42.1 %

Carbonates

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

33.5 %

32.9 %

33.7 %

31.8 %

32.5 %

Juice/Juice drinks

171.3

195.5

223.4

203.9

178.4

13.7 %

14.2 %

15.5 %

14.9 %

13.0 %

Still Drinks (low/no fruit)

79.1

83.3

84.8

88.3

85.5

6.3 %

6.0 %

5.9 %

6.5 %

6.2 %

Squash/Syrups

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

2.0 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

2.2 %

Fruit Powders

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.2 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

Energy Drinks

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

Sports Drinks

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

1.2

2.4

1.5

1.2

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total

Flavoured Water
Functional Water
Iced/RTD Coffee

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

0.0 %

0.0 %

PDF Editor

Chart - Packaged Water Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 .................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Packaged Water Trademarks 2008-2010 ............................................................................................. 3
Functional Products ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Packaged Water New Products 2010 ................................................................................................................. 5
Packaged Water New Products Photo Shots 2010 ............................................................................................ 5
Packaged Water Trademark Owners and Local Operators ................................................................................ 6
Packaged Water Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ................................................................................ 6
Packaged Water Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ................................................................................ 8
Packaged Water vs Bulk/HOD Water Consumption, .......................................................................................... 9
Packaged Water Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ......................................................................... 9
Packaged Water Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F .................................................................. 9
Packaged Water Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ................................................................ 10
Packaged Water Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F ............................................................................... 10
Packaged Water Consumption Flavoured vs Unflavoured, 2007-2011F.......................................................... 10
Packaged Water All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................... 11
Packaged Water Brands by Segment, 2007-2011F ......................................................................................... 11
Packaged Water Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 .............................................................................................. 13
Soft Drinks Flavoured Water Brands, 2007-2010 ............................................................................................. 14
Soft Drinks Water Brands by Market Definition, 2006-2010 ............................................................................. 14
Packaged Water All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................... 15
Packaged Water All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................. 16
Packaged Water Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................. 18
Packaged Water Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 .................................................................................... 18
Packaged Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Segment/Refillability, 2007-2011F ............................................ 19
Packaged Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Segment, 2007-2011F ............................................ 20
Packaged Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Segment/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .............................................. 20
Packaged Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ........................................... 21
Packaged Water Distribution: On vs Off Premise by Segment/Channel, 2007-2011F..................................... 22
Packaged Water Distribution: On vs Off Premise by Channel/Segment, 2007-2011F ..................................... 23

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

576.8

78.7

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

3.9 %

-0.7 %

1.7 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

22,371.85

38.79

311.16

0.54

Still

Carbonated

41.8 %

58.2 %

Off-Premise

On-Premise

89.1 %

10.9 %

PET

Glass

93.2 %

6.8 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010
% Share
Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


After two consecutive years of negative trends, growth of 2% was seen in 2010. Despite the very favourable
weather conditions, a double digit drop during Sept-Nov prevented a better final year result.
Increased consumer awareness to the benefits of drinking mineral water combined with aggressive pricing
and marketing efforts helped still water volumes rise by 9% in 2010.

Outlook
Growth of 2% is expected to be seen again in 2011. This recovery will be mostly driven by promotional multi
pack sizes and 500cl PET. Established consumers will stay loyal to carbonated water, while the new
consumers will favour still water due to its healthy image.
Jazak, and Mivela marketing activity is likely to jeopardise the sale of the current leaders but it will take time
for there to be a jump in the data.

Segmentation
Still water continued to take share from carbonated water as it was considered to be a healthier option.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Minaqua

Minaqua

128.4

107.3

113.0

Vrncji

Voda Vrnjci

82.7

101.8

108.4

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

119.0

103.0

92.4

Rosa

Coca-Cola

46.8

50.2

58.7

Aqua Viva

Knjaz Milos

44.3

46.8

50.0

Heba

Nectar

35.8

34.8

Heba

38.6

Prolom

Planinka

23.5

22.7

23.4

Aqua Bella

Rodic

18.7

17.8

18.6

Bivoda

Bivoda

9.2

11.1

13.6

Karadorde

Droga Kolinska

10.6

9.4

8.9

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Vrnjci (aggressive pricing), Rosa (strong BTL investments) and Prolom (healthy image) slowly took share at
the expense of popular brand Knjaz Milos.
Mivela, increased by 67%, from a small base, supported by above-the-line, sport related sponsorship and its
new owner, Croatian retail leader Agrokor-Konzum. Mivela was also gaining popularity in the exported

PDF Editor

regional market.
Prolom, with its healthy image, increased by 3%. The healthy image was backed up by its unofficial
endorsement from Serbian doctors, who recommended it to patients with liver problems. This created the
perception that it is a very healthy water.
Heavy investment in marketing was seen at the end of 2010 from the new owner of Jazak brand, Gazprom
Neft (which acquired the original owner of Jazak, NIS National Oil Company in December 2008). Gazprom
Neft invested a great deal in the brand and a further bump in sales is expected. With plans to continue above
the line campaigns, this will affect the market share of current leaders.
Heba was bought by Nectar in 2008 and there may be investment being made in above the line marketing.
Heba is Nectars first packaged water, although in 2010 it was not one of the leaders in the category.

Functional Products
Donat Mg, an imported Slovenian water, now owned by Atlantic Grupa (ex Droga Kolinska), recorded slow
growth, but still with volumes bellow 1 m litres. Without serious marketing activity, it would be hard to make
progress in this segment. Donat sales volume was very small and not included in Canadeans data.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Premia (Delta-Maxi), Aro (Metro) and Minela (Interex) recorded 2% growth, but from a small base.
Consumers expressed high brand loyalty, which made it hard for newcomers in the market. Gains could be
made at a high cost through permanent marketing investments.

Marketing
Sport and health associated brands Knjaz Milos and Rosa had regular marketing activity which translated into
good gains. Rosa (Coca-Cola) held 10% of the market in 2010.
The rebranded Mivela brand (Agrokor), supported by a strong TV campaign and sponsorship agreements in
sport (the national soccer team and Red Star Belgrade FC), made good gains from a small base.
Jazak ran a TV campaign (approx 200,000 invested) in the second half of 2010 but it is still too early to tell if
this was successful.

Pricing/Valuation
Shelf prices followed the currency movements. Knjaz Miloss carbonated water and Rosa kept higher prices,
while the ongoing war on 500cl PET decreased the producers margins. As a response, Akva Viva reduced its
prices for 6-packs in key accounts and temporarily regained price sensitive consumers.

Packaging
PET was almost exclusively packaged for off-premise consumption, where 500cl PET and the latest 6x150cl
PET multi packs dominated.
Glass in the Horeca channel remained the key advantage for the leading brands due to its association with
high quality.

PDF Editor

Distribution
North Serbia, with poor tap water quality, and Belgrade remained the key market for this category.
Off-premise grew by 4%, taking a share from on-premise. It was driven by 500cl PET and multi-pack
promotions in modern retail outlets while slow contraction in the on-premise was affected by lower disposable
income and the trend to stay at home.
Knjaz Milos, the clear market leader in the on-premise, lost share as Rosa exploited synergy effects from the
other Coca-Cola brands in making exclusive agreements with key Horeca outlets.
Vrncji attempted to compete on price but the results show this was unsuccessful.

New Products 2010

Company
Knjaz Milos

Brand
Knjaz Milos

Flavour(s)
Regular low
carbonated

Metro Cash&Carry

Aro (Private
Label)

Still and
carbonated
spring water

Pack
Type/Size
150cl PET

Price
RSD58.00

Comment
25% less carbonation than
regular Knjaz Milos water (see
Figure 1)

50cl PET
200cl PET
500cl PET

RSD17.19
RSD25.96
RSD54.28

New Private Label brand (see


Figure 2)

Source : Canadean

Figure 1: Knjaz Milos

Figure 2 : Aro PL Packaged Water

Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aqua Bella

Rodic

Rodic

Aqua Viva

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Bivoda

Bivoda

Bivoda

Heba

Nectar

Heba

Jamnica

Agrokor

Jamnica

Jana

Agrokor

Jamnica

Jazak

Naftagaz

Naftagaz

Karadorde

Droga Kolinska

Palanacki Kiseljack

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Minaqua

Minaqua

Minaqua

Mivela

Agrokor

Mivela

Prolom

Planinka

Planinka

Rosa

Coca-Cola

Vlasinka

Skadarska Voda

Bip Belgrade

Bip Belgrade

Vmjacko Vrelo

Vrnjacko Vrelo

Vrnjacko Vrelo

Voda

Arteska International

Voda Voda

Vrncji

Voda Vrnjci

Voda Vrnjci

Vujic Voda

Vujic Voda

Vujic Voda

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

25

AQUA VIVA (KNJAZ MILOS)

28.50

114.00

25

PROLOM

25

VRNJCI

22.05

23.58

88.20

94.32

33

EVIAN

127.72

119.90

387.03

363.33

33

PERRIER

89.76

95.53

272.00

289.48

33

ROSA

24.31

25.90

73.67

78.48

75

AQUA VIVA

75

PERRIER

33
33
50

GALA (MAXI)

50

HEBA

19.81

50

PROLOM

27.59

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
STILL
NR
GLASS

NRPET

26.54

27.38

23.60

24.90

106.16

109.52

94.40

99.60

42.00

43.85

56.00

58.47

122.54

157.41

163.39

209.88

AQUA BELLA

17.23

18.52

52.21

56.12

EVIAN

86.90

99.90

263.33

302.73

22.90

23.90

45.80

47.80

54.72

59.34

PDF Editor

39.62
27.36

29.67

55.18

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

50

ROSA

28.90

50

VODA VODA

50

VRNJCI

50

ZLATIBOR

70
75
150

AQUA BELLA

24.86

150

AQUA VIVA

41.90

150

AQUAHEBA

150

EVIAN

150

GALA (MAXI)

150

HEBA

32.78

150

KARADJORDJE

29.50

150

PREMIA (MAXI)

150

PROLOM

150

ROSA

150

VODA VODA

200

AQUA BELLA

200

ARO (METRO)

200

MINAQUA

200

TOP BUDGET ( INTEREX)

500

AQUA VIVA

500

ARO (METRO)

575

KARADJORDJE

600

EKO VODA HEBA

600

ROSA

600

TOP BUDGET ( INTEREX)

600

VRNJACKO VRELO

600

ZLATIBOR

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

30.50

33.90

28.90

30.58

30.50

32.90

32.90

29.90

AQUA BELLA

17.23

GALA (MAXI)

28.90
36.37

41.90

26.89

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

57.80

61.00

67.80

57.80

61.16

61.00

65.80

65.80

59.80

18.58

24.61

26.54

33.90

38.53

45.20

24.25

27.93

53.78

16.57
27.93

35.20

36.41

38.90

23.47

24.27

25.93

233.90

234.90

263.90

155.93

156.60

175.93

31.90

39.90

21.27

26.60

30.31

31.80

20.21

21.20

27.90

35.90

18.60

23.93

46.90

45.90

48.90

31.27

30.60

32.60

42.90

42.90

44.90

28.60

28.60

29.93

38.50

40.39

25.67

26.93

25.95

26.58

12.98

13.29

25.96

27.41

12.98

13.71

28.70

30.58

14.35

15.29

13.00

14.00

20.00

24.58

10.86

11.63

13.48

13.81

26.89
35.90
101.90
76.59

21.85
19.67

13.45
17.95

26.00

28.00

99.99

122.90

54.28

58.17

77.50

79.39

13.32

20.38

66.90

57.86

60.27

11.15

9.64

10.05

122.90

109.70

132.90

20.48

18.28

22.15

49.00

53.00

8.17

8.83

65.90

69.90

11.65

10.98

11.65

64.50

90.90

10.75

15.15

27.35

28.58

109.40

114.32

28.66

29.90

39.33

56.12

69.90

CARBONATED
NR
GLASS

25

KNAZ MILOS

28.50

RB GLASS

33

KNJAZ MILOS

29.90

100

KNJAZ MILOS

29.90

NRPET

114.00

90.61
28.66

29.90

12.98

18.52

29.90

33

AQUA BELLA (RODIC)

33

MINAQUA

15.90

50

HEBA

19.81

21.16

22.39

39.62

42.32

44.78

50

KARADJORDJE

24.00

26.30

27.19

48.00

52.60

54.38

50

KNJAZ MILOS

29.90

29.99

30.90

59.80

59.98

61.80

50

MIVELA

29.12

31.90

58.24

63.80

50

ROSA (COCA-COLA)

28.90

30.19

57.80

60.38

PDF Editor

28.90

48.18

57.80

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

50
50

VODA VODA (SI & SI)


VODA VRNJCI

34.90
28.90

50
70

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

69.80
57.80

30.50

31.90

61.00

63.80

ZLATIBOR

25.00

26.00

50.00

52.00

AQUA BELLA (RODIC)

17.23

18.58

24.61

26.54

100

BIVODA

21.80

22.58

21.80

22.58

100

DONAT

83.00

86.90

83.00

86.90

150

KARADJORDJE

29.50

37.50

38.90

19.67

25.00

25.93

150

KNJAZ MILOS

41.00

39.99

42.90

27.33

26.66

28.60

150

MIVELA

40.92

41.99

27.28

27.99

150

ROSA

42.90

35.00

36.58

23.33

24.39

150

VODA VODA (SI & SI)

44.90

150

ZLATIBOR

31.00

39.90

20.67

26.60

200

AQUA BELLA (RODIC)

27.29

25.95

26.58

13.65

12.98

13.29

200

MINAQUA

35.90

34.99

43.90

17.95

17.50

21.95

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

33

AQUA BELLA

110.00

333.33

33

EVIAN

180.00

50

AQUA VIVA

135.00

84.00

90.00

270.00

168.00

180.00

50

AQUA HEBA

135.00

75.00

79.00

270.00

150.00

158.00

50

KNJAZ MILOS

120.00

60.00

65.00

240.00

120.00

130.00

50

VODA VODA

160.00

84.00

90.00

320.00

168.00

180.00

50

VRNJCI

135.00

75.00

80.00

270.00

150.00

160.00

20

PERRIER

180.00

25

KNJAZ MILOS

60.00

84.00

90.00

240.00

336.00

360.00

25

VRNJCI

60.00

84.00

90.00

240.00

336.00

360.00

28.60
29.93

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
STILL
NRPET

GLASS

SOURCE : Canadean

PDF Editor

545.45

900.00

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

607.9

606.1

594.7

610.6

628.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bulk/HOD Water

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

3.2 %

4.4 %

4.6 %

5.5 %

6.6 %

Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

96.8 %

95.6 %

95.4 %

94.5 %

93.4 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Production
Imports
Exports
Consumption

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

338.4

353.0

417.8

485.0

506.6

541.9

586.7

654.9

645.5

626.1

632.1

647.0

5.1

4.4

6.5

8.1

6.8

8.2

4.4

9.4

9.0

9.1

7.1

4.5

52.9

46.3

50.1

54.8

53.2

74.5

62.4

75.6

75.0

68.1

62.4

65.0

290.6

311.1

374.1

438.2

460.2

475.6

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

9.4

9.0

9.1

7.1

4.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Croatia

1.7

2.6

3.3

2.9

0.3

18.5 %

28.4 %

35.6 %

40.9 %

6.0 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.6

3.7 %

6.0 %

6.7 %

7.9 %

13.2 %

Slovenia

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

5.3 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

5.6 %

8.8 %

Greece

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.3 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

France

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

Italy

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Others

6.7

5.5

4.8

3.1

3.2

71.2 %

60.6 %

52.6 %

44.1 %

70.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

75.6

75.0

68.1

62.4

65.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Montenegro

35.8

37.0

32.2

29.6

30.0

47.4 %

49.4 %

47.3 %

47.4 %

46.2 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina

13.2

13.0

12.6

13.5

13.8

17.5 %

17.3 %

18.5 %

21.7 %

21.2 %

Kosovo

14.8

13.8

13.8

10.8

11.0

19.5 %

18.4 %

20.2 %

17.3 %

16.9 %

Macedonia

6.3

6.0

5.4

4.1

4.2

8.3 %

8.0 %

7.9 %

6.6 %

6.5 %

Others

5.5

5.2

4.1

4.4

6.0

7.3 %

6.9 %

6.0 %

7.1 %

9.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.2

64.5 %

63.4 %

60.0 %

57.5 %

57.3 %

- Mineral

373.3

361.1

331.5

325.9

330.3

63.4 %

62.3 %

58.5 %

56.5 %

56.3 %

- Spring

4.1

3.8

6.6

5.4

5.8

0.7 %

0.7 %

1.2 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Table

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Low Carbonation

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Mineral

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Total Still

203.6

206.3

221.0

240.9

245.6

34.6 %

35.6 %

39.0 %

41.8 %

41.9 %

- Mineral

170.5

181.0

200.2

221.4

227.1

29.0 %

31.2 %

35.3 %

38.4 %

38.7 %

- Spring

21.5

17.1

13.8

10.9

10.3

3.7 %

3.0 %

2.4 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

- Table

11.5

8.2

7.0

8.5

8.2

2.0 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Unflavoured

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.2

64.5 %

63.4 %

60.0 %

57.5 %

57.3 %

- Still

203.6

206.3

221.0

240.9

245.6

34.6 %

35.6 %

39.0 %

41.8 %

41.9 %

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Low Carbonation

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.5 %

18.2 %

16.0 %

Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.7 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

Prolom

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

Jazak

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Vmjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Jana

1.7

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

Jamnica

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Vrncji
Knjaz Milos

Bivoda

Skadarska Voda

2.1

Rada

0.1

Duboka

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

10.5

14.5

2.0 %

2.5 %

Others

0.4 %
0.0 %

17.6

30.6

25.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mineral

373.3

361.1

331.5

325.9

330.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Minaqua

121.3

119.5

98.9

97.9

98.8

32.5 %

33.1 %

29.8 %

30.0 %

29.9 %

- Knjaz Milos

134.4

117.7

101.9

91.1

93.0

36.0 %

32.6 %

30.7 %

28.0 %

28.2 %

- Vrncji

52.6

56.1

61.1

66.4

67.3

14.1 %

15.5 %

18.4 %

20.4 %

20.4 %

- Heba

27.3

29.2

27.7

25.7

26.3

7.3 %

8.1 %

8.3 %

7.9 %

8.0 %

- Aqua Bella

15.8

16.2

15.4

16.1

16.4

4.2 %

4.5 %

4.6 %

4.9 %

5.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Bivoda

6.8

7.9

8.9

10.0

9.8

1.8 %

2.2 %

2.7 %

3.1 %

3.0 %

- Others

4.4

6.4

11.1

8.6

8.9

1.2 %

1.8 %

3.4 %

2.7 %

2.7 %

- Mivela

1.5

1.0

1.0

4.7

5.1

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

- Karadorde

4.2

4.1

3.7

3.1

2.2

1.1 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

- Jazak

2.4

2.2

1.2

1.2

1.3

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Rosa

0.9

0.3

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Jamnica

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Duboka

1.4

- Spring

0.4 %

4.1

3.8

6.6

5.4

5.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

4.1

3.8

6.6

5.4

5.8

99.3 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Voda Voda

0.0

- Table

0.7 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Low Carbonation

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mineral

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Vrncji

2.1

2.4

2.7

2.9

3.1

38.8 %

40.2 %

44.3 %

63.9 %

63.9 %

- Knjaz Milos

1.2

1.4

1.2

1.3

1.5

22.4 %

22.3 %

19.6 %

28.9 %

29.9 %

- Heba

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.3

7.4 %

6.0 %

5.8 %

7.3 %

6.2 %

- Mivela

1.7

1.9

1.8

0.0

0.0

31.4 %

31.5 %

30.3 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Still

203.6

206.3

221.0

240.9

245.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mineral

170.5

181.0

200.2

221.4

227.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Rosa

40.9

46.5

50.0

58.2

59.4

24.0 %

25.7 %

25.0 %

26.3 %

26.1 %

- Aqua Viva

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

50.7

20.7 %

24.5 %

23.4 %

22.6 %

22.3 %

- Vrncji

23.9

24.2

38.1

39.1

39.9

14.0 %

13.4 %

19.0 %

17.7 %

17.6 %

- Prolom

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

24.2

14.5 %

13.0 %

11.3 %

10.6 %

10.6 %

- Minaqua

10.5

8.9

8.4

15.1

15.7

6.1 %

4.9 %

4.2 %

6.8 %

6.9 %

- Others

6.0

5.0

8.7

7.5

7.9

3.5 %

2.8 %

4.3 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

- Karadorde

6.6

6.5

5.7

5.7

5.9

3.8 %

3.6 %

2.8 %

2.6 %

2.6 %

- Vmjacko Vrelo

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

5.5

3.7 %

3.4 %

2.3 %

2.3 %

2.4 %

- Jazak

4.7

4.7

3.0

4.2

4.5

2.8 %

2.6 %

1.5 %

1.9 %

2.0 %

- Vujic Voda

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

3.7

2.4 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

- Bivoda

1.5

1.3

2.1

3.6

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- Jana

1.7

2.6

2.7

2.8

3.1

1.0 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

- Aqua Bella

2.3

2.5

2.4

2.5

2.7

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

1.1 %

1.2 %

- Heba

1.0

0.8

0.8

0.3

0.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Duboka

1.1

- Skadarska Voda

0.6 %

- Spring

21.5

17.1

13.8

10.9

10.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Voda

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

6.4

100.0 %

86.0 %

69.8 %

68.9 %

62.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2007
- Others

% Share

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2.4

4.2

3.4

3.9

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

14.0 %

30.2 %

31.1 %

38.0 %

- Table

11.5

8.2

7.0

8.5

8.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Heba

11.5

8.2

7.0

8.5

8.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Unflavoured

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.5 %

18.2 %

16.0 %

- Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

- Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.7 %

- Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

- Prolom

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

- Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

- Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

- Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Jazak

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

- Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

- Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

- Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Jana

1.7

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

- Jamnica

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Vrncji
- Knjaz Milos

- Bivoda

- Skadarska Voda

2.1

0.4 %

- Rada

0.1

- Duboka

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

- Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

1.2

2.4

1.5

1.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Jana

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

64.7 %

41.4 %

57.2 %

69.6 %

Aqua Viva

0.3

0.8

0.3

0.3

25.7 %

34.9 %

20.4 %

24.3 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

19.5 %

19.7 %

6.1 %

0.1

0.0

4.2 %

2.7 %

Rosa Emotion
Mila

0.1

9.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

590.0

582.3

569.0

578.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Packaged Water Plain

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

99.8 %

99.5 %

99.7 %

99.7 %

- Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.3 %

22.1 %

18.9 %

19.5 %

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.2 %

17.9 %

18.7 %

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.4 %

18.1 %

16.0 %

- Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.0 %

8.8 %

10.2 %

- Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.6 %

- Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.6 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

- Prolom

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.0 %

4.0 %

4.0 %

- Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.3 %

- Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

- Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.6 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Jazak

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

- Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

- Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

- Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Jana

1.7

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

- Jamnica

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Vrncji
- Knjaz Milos

- Bivoda

- Skadarska Voda

2.1

0.4 %

- Rada

0.1

- Duboka

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

- Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Functional Water

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Aqua Viva Slim

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

Flavoured Water

1.2

2.4

1.5

- Jana

0.8

1.0

- Aqua Viva

0.3

- Rosa Emotion
- Mila

0.1

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1.2

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.8

0.8

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.8

0.3

0.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.1

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agrokor

2.0

3.0

6.0

8.0

0.3 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

- Jamnica

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Jana

1.7

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

2.8

4.7

0.5 %

0.8 %

Total

- Mivela
Arteska International

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Bambi

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

- Duboka

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

Bip Belgrade

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Skadarska Voda

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

- Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

Coca-Cola

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

- Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Droga Kolinska

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

- Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

- Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

- Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.7 %

- Knjaz Milos

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.5 %

18.2 %

16.0 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

- Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

Mivela

3.3

3.2

- Mivela

3.3

Naftagaz
- Jazak

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2.9

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

3.2

2.9

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Nectar

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Heba

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

- Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

- Prolom

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

0.0 %

- Rada

0.1

0.0 %

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

- Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

- Vrncji

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

- Vmjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bambi

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

- Duboka

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

Bip Belgrade

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Skadarska Voda

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

- Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

Total

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

Jamnica

2.0

3.0

3.2

- Jamnica

0.3

0.4

- Jana

1.7

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

3.3

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.5

0.5

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

- Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.7 %

- Knjaz Milos

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.5 %

18.2 %

16.0 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

- Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

- Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

- Jazak

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

- Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

- Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

- Prolom

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

0.0 %

- Rada

0.1

0.0 %

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

- Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Vlasinka

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

- Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Voda Voda

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

- Vrncji

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

- Vmjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Coca-Cola

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

Nectar
Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

2.0

3.0

6.0

8.0

0.3 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Bip Belgrade

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

Bambi

2.8

2.5

Others

10.5

14.5

5.4 %

4.3 %

Droga Kolinska
Agrokor
Arteska International

0.0 %

17.6

30.6

25.0

0.5 %

0.4 %

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Vlasinka

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

18

PDF Editor

Section 3A Packaged Water Category Profile


Soft Drinks Service/May-11

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

Voda Voda

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

2.0

3.0

3.2

3.3

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Jamnica
Bip Belgrade

2.1

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

Bambi

2.8

2.5

Others

10.5

14.5

0.4 %
0.0 %

17.6

30.6

25.0

0.5 %

0.4 %

2.0 %

2.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.2

64.5 %

63.4 %

60.0 %

57.5 %

57.3 %

- Non-Refillable

344.5

335.7

310.9

302.9

309.3

58.5 %

57.9 %

54.8 %

52.5 %

52.7 %

35.3

31.4

29.1

28.5

26.8

6.0 %

5.4 %

5.1 %

4.9 %

4.6 %

Low Carbonation

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Non-Refillable

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Still

203.6

206.3

221.1

240.9

245.6

34.6 %

35.6 %

39.0 %

41.8 %

41.9 %

- Non-Refillable

201.6

205.0

219.8

239.6

244.1

34.2 %

35.4 %

38.8 %

41.5 %

41.6 %

2.0

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.5

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

- Refillable

- Refillable

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Non-Refillable

551.5

546.7

536.8

546.9

558.3

93.7 %

94.4 %

94.7 %

94.8 %

95.2 %

- Carbonated

344.5

335.7

310.9

302.9

309.3

58.5 %

57.9 %

54.8 %

52.5 %

52.7 %

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

201.6

205.0

219.8

239.6

244.1

34.2 %

35.4 %

38.8 %

41.5 %

41.6 %

Refillable

37.3

32.7

30.3

29.9

28.4

6.3 %

5.6 %

5.3 %

5.2 %

4.8 %

- Carbonated

35.3

31.4

29.1

28.5

26.8

6.0 %

5.4 %

5.1 %

4.9 %

4.6 %

2.0

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.5

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

- Low Carbonation
- Still

- Still

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

41.8

35.4

32.6

31.9

30.4

7.1 %

6.1 %

5.7 %

5.5 %

5.2 %

41.8

35.4

32.6

31.9

30.4

7.1 %

6.1 %

5.7 %

5.5 %

5.2 %

- 25cl

6.5

4.0

3.5

3.4

3.6

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- 33cl

10.5

9.0

8.3

7.8

8.4

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

- 100cl

24.8

22.4

20.8

20.8

18.4

4.2 %

3.9 %

3.7 %

3.6 %

3.1 %

338.0

331.7

307.4

299.5

305.8

57.4 %

57.2 %

54.2 %

51.9 %

52.1 %

338.0

331.7

307.4

299.5

305.8

57.4 %

57.2 %

54.2 %

51.9 %

52.1 %

- Glass
- Bottle

- PET
- Bottle
- 33cl

3.0

1.0

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.5 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 50cl

20.5

21.0

19.5

17.1

18.6

3.5 %

3.6 %

3.4 %

3.0 %

3.2 %

- 70cl

3.0

2.0

1.6

1.5

1.4

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- 150cl

190.2

188.2

174.6

171.7

174.2

32.3 %

32.5 %

30.8 %

29.8 %

29.7 %

- 200cl

117.0

119.5

111.1

108.5

111.0

19.9 %

20.6 %

19.6 %

18.8 %

18.9 %

- 500cl

4.3

0.7 %

Total Low Carbonation

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- PET

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Bottle

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- 150cl

4.1

4.7

4.7

3.6

4.2

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- 200cl

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

- 500cl

1.0

1.1

1.1

0.8

0.3

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

203.6

206.3

221.1

240.9

245.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

10.1

8.3

7.6

7.4

7.8

1.7 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

- Bottle

10.1

8.3

7.6

7.4

7.8

1.7 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

- 25cl

6.4

5.5

5.0

4.8

4.9

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- 33cl

1.7

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.4

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- 100cl

2.0

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.5

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

193.5

198.0

213.5

233.5

237.8

32.9 %

34.2 %

37.6 %

40.5 %

40.5 %

193.5

198.0

213.5

233.5

237.8

32.9 %

34.2 %

37.6 %

40.5 %

40.5 %

- Glass

- PET
- Bottle
- 33cl

1.0

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- 50cl

26.0

26.5

27.4

25.4

26.3

4.4 %

4.6 %

4.8 %

4.4 %

4.5 %

- 70cl

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

1.3

0.7

0.1

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- 75cl
- 100cl

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 150cl

94.1

94.0

102.8

111.7

113.0

16.0 %

16.2 %

18.1 %

19.4 %

19.3 %

- 200cl

11.7

11.5

11.2

12.8

13.2

2.0 %

2.0 %

2.0 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

- 500cl

45.5

46.0

49.7

60.0

62.7

7.7 %

7.9 %

8.8 %

10.4 %

10.7 %

- 575cl

2.2

2.5

2.6

2.9

2.4

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

- 600cl

12.5

16.4

17.5

19.1

19.5

2.1 %

2.8 %

3.1 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 800cl
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

551.5

546.7

536.8

546.9

558.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

14.6

11.0

9.9

9.4

9.9

2.5 %

1.9 %

1.7 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- Bottle

14.6

11.0

9.9

9.4

9.9

2.5 %

1.9 %

1.7 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- 25cl

12.9

9.5

8.5

8.1

8.5

2.2 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

- 33cl

1.7

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.4

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

536.9

535.7

526.9

537.5

548.4

91.2 %

92.5 %

92.9 %

93.2 %

93.5 %

536.9

535.7

526.9

537.5

548.4

91.2 %

92.5 %

92.9 %

93.2 %

93.5 %

- 33cl

4.0

1.5

1.2

1.0

0.7

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- 50cl

46.5

47.5

46.9

42.5

44.9

7.9 %

8.2 %

8.3 %

7.4 %

7.6 %

- 70cl

3.0

2.0

1.6

1.5

1.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Glass

- PET
- Bottle

- 75cl

0.0

1.3

0.7

0.1

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- 100cl

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 150cl

288.3

286.9

282.0

287.0

291.4

49.0 %

49.5 %

49.7 %

49.8 %

49.7 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- 200cl

129.0

131.3

122.6

121.6

124.5

21.9 %

22.7 %

21.6 %

21.1 %

21.2 %

- 500cl

50.8

47.1

50.7

60.8

63.0

8.6 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.5 %

10.7 %

- 575cl

2.2

2.5

2.6

2.9

2.4

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

- 600cl

12.5

16.4

17.5

19.1

19.5

2.1 %

2.8 %

3.1 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 800cl
Total Refillable

37.3

32.7

30.3

29.9

28.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Glass

37.3

32.7

30.3

29.9

28.4

6.3 %

5.6 %

5.3 %

5.2 %

4.8 %

- Bottle

37.3

32.7

30.3

29.9

28.4

6.3 %

5.6 %

5.3 %

5.2 %

4.8 %

- 33cl

10.5

9.0

8.3

7.8

8.4

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

- 100cl

26.8

23.7

22.0

22.1

19.9

4.5 %

4.1 %

3.9 %

3.8 %

3.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

379.8

367.1

340.0

331.4

336.1

64.5 %

63.4 %

60.0 %

57.5 %

57.3 %

- Off-Premise

328.3

316.1

297.4

293.4

296.0

55.8 %

54.6 %

52.4 %

50.9 %

50.5 %

- On-Premise

51.5

51.0

42.6

38.0

40.1

8.7 %

8.8 %

7.5 %

6.6 %

6.8 %

Total Low Carbonation

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Off-Premise

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Total Still

203.6

206.3

221.1

240.8

245.6

34.6 %

35.6 %

39.0 %

41.8 %

41.9 %

- Off-Premise

172.6

174.3

191.6

215.9

219.0

29.3 %

30.1 %

33.8 %

37.4 %

37.3 %

- On-Premise

31.0

32.0

29.5

25.0

26.6

5.3 %

5.5 %

5.2 %

4.3 %

4.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Off-Premise

506.2

496.5

495.0

513.8

519.9

86.0 %

85.7 %

87.3 %

89.1 %

88.6 %

- Carbonated

328.3

316.1

297.4

293.4

296.0

55.8 %

54.6 %

52.4 %

50.9 %

50.5 %

5.4

6.1

6.0

4.5

4.9

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

172.6

174.3

191.6

215.9

219.0

29.3 %

30.1 %

33.8 %

37.4 %

37.3 %

Total On-Premise

82.5

83.0

72.1

63.0

66.7

14.0 %

14.3 %

12.7 %

10.9 %

11.4 %

- Carbonated

51.5

51.0

42.6

38.0

40.1

8.7 %

8.8 %

7.5 %

6.6 %

6.8 %

- Still

31.0

32.0

29.5

25.0

26.6

5.3 %

5.5 %

5.2 %

4.3 %

4.5 %

- Low Carbonation
- Still

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

Chart - Bulk/HOD Water Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 .................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Bulk/HOD Water Trademarks 2008-2010 ............................................................................................. 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Bulk/HOD Water Trademark Owners and Local Operators ................................................................................ 4
Bulk/HOD Water Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ................................................................................ 5
Bulk/HOD Water Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ................................................................................ 5
Packaged Water vs Bulk/HOD Water Consumption, .......................................................................................... 5
Bulk/HOD Water Production/Trade/Consumption, 2001-2011F ......................................................................... 6
Bulk/HOD Water Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F ................................................................................. 6
Bulk/HOD Water All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ..................................................................................................... 6
Bulk/HOD Water Brands by Segment, 2007-2011F ........................................................................................... 6
Bulk/HOD Water All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ......................................................................................... 7
Bulk/HOD Water All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................... 8
Bulk/HOD Water Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................ 8
Bulk/HOD Water Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................... 9
Bulk/HOD Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Segment/Refillability, 2007-2011F .............................................. 9
Bulk/HOD Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Segment, 2007-2011F .............................................. 9
Bulk/HOD Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Segment/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .............................................. 10
Bulk/HOD Water Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ........................................... 10
Bulk/HOD Water Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ....................................................................... 10

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

33.8

4.6

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

26.6 %

20.7 %

22.5 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

535.86

15.85

7.45

0.22

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010

Still

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

On-Premise

Off-Premise

93.7 %

6.3 %

Polycarbonate

PET

96.3 %

3.7 %

% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


One of the brightest soft drink categories, measured in growth rates, was certainly bulk/HOD water. The
bulk/HOD water concept started purely as a business to business proposition. Impressive growth of 23%
made this market very promising. There were several reasons behind this including cost cutting strategies by
institutions like banks, offices and small businesses which helped to drive this category forward.
In 2010, producers began to target personal consumption and won many consumers over because of the
comparatively low price per litre. Home delivery flourished as a result.
Flexible selling conditions and the type of water cooler (regarding energy savings and hot water availability)
remained very important attributes.

Outlook
It is anticipated that 2011 will show similar growth rates to 2010, but finding new distribution channels in order
to achieve the same growth is an important challenge that will arise in the future.

Segmentation
Bulk/HOD water was exclusively still water. Aqua Una (Knjaz Milos) and Vrnjacko Vrelo sold mineral water
with great success.
Spring water had a 45% share and table water, being offered by Zdrava Vo2da, held a small but increasing
share.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Aqua Una

Knjaz Milos

8.1

12.9

16.3

La Fantana

La Fantana

12.5

11.0

14.1

Odmenjska

Ekofarm

2.6

1.1

1.2

Eko

Nectar

1.7

1.1

Heba

2.0

Vmjacko Vrelo

Vrnjacko Vrelo

0.4

0.6

0.7

Zdrava Vo2da

Zdrava Voda

0.9

0.2

0.3

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

The category was dominated by two brands, Aqua Una (Knjaz Milos), with 48% and La Fantana, with 42% of
the market.
The main reason behind Aqua Unas accelerated growth in the last few years was the almost complete
dominance to deliver water coolers to households. While other brands like La Fantana, did deliver coolers
they did so with strict conditions in place. Aqua Una was the first brand to agree to deliver coolers with loose
conditions attached to the delivery. This also converted some of the packaged water consumers onto their
brand.

PDF Editor

La Fantana, with strong a distribution network, also achieved double digit growth. La Fantana had a very
good distribution line and benefited from its stringent conditions of supply contracts.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Not available.

Marketing
The majority of marketing was business to business, which reflected the lack of available capital

Pricing/Valuation
Prices increased 6% on average.
Aqua Unas selling policy (loose conditions for home delivered water cooler) may jeopardise its liquidity in
2011. So far its created an extensive customer list and volumes for this company.
As logistical costs directly affect the price, the increased cost of petrol impacted on the overall price of the
category. As rural area delivery costs are higher, price lists are set to follow it.

Packaging
The lions share of the market was with 1,890cl ref polycarbonate bubble top, with over 96% of the market.

Distribution
Households 15% market share in 2009 almost doubled in 2010, while distribution to offices grew 25%.
Logistical power of the two leading producers remained a very important advantage. With extensive
distribution networks already in place and the high cost of entry it was very difficult for any new producers to
gain an advantage.

New Products 2010


No new products in 2010.

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aqua Una

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Eko

Nectar

Heba

La Fantana

La Fantana

La Fantana

Odmenjska

Ekofarm

Others

Odmenjska

Ekofarm

Strategic Trade and Distribution

Vmjacko Vrelo

Vrnjacko Vrelo

Vrnjacko Vrelo

Zdrava Vo2da

Zdrava Voda

Zdrava Voda

SOURCE: Canadean

PDF Editor

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

1500

VRNJACKO VRELO

208.05

220.89

226.79

13.87

14.73

15.12

1890

LA FANTANA

378.00

378.00

389.00

20.00

20.00

20.58

1890

ZDRAVA VO2DA

420.00

395.00

405.00

22.22

20.90

21.43

2000

EKO VODA

205.62

210.00

10.28

10.50

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

POLYCARBONATE

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

370.00

385.00

19.58

20.37

POLYCARBONATE
1890

AQUA UNA

1890

LA FANTANA

378.00

378.00

393.00

20.00

20.00

20.79

1890

ZDRAVA VO2DA

420.00

395.00

410.00

22.22

20.90

21.69

SOURCE : Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

607.9

606.1

594.7

610.6

628.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bulk/HOD Water

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

3.2 %

4.4 %

4.6 %

5.5 %

6.6 %

Packaged Water

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

586.6

96.8 %

95.6 %

95.4 %

94.5 %

93.4 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Production

0.9

2.4

3.1

7.0

10.4

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

Consumption

0.9

2.4

3.1

7.0

10.4

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mineral

4.7

10.6

15.2

18.2

22.8

24.4 %

39.8 %

55.2 %

53.8 %

54.7 %

- Spring

13.6

15.1

12.1

15.3

18.3

70.8 %

56.7 %

43.9 %

45.3 %

43.9 %

- Table

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

0.6

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Aqua Una

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Odmenjska

4.3

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

28.2 %

13.2 %

9.8 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

Eko

1.7

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Total

Vmjacko Vrelo
Zdrava Vo2da

0.8

0.9

0.9

Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Bulk/HOD Water

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mineral

4.7

10.6

15.2

18.2

22.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Aqua Una

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

19.9

53.8 %

76.5 %

84.5 %

89.7 %

87.5 %

- Eko

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

1.9

41.9 %

18.7 %

10.8 %

6.1 %

8.4 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Vmjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.9

0.6 %

3.7 %

4.1 %

3.9 %

4.0 %

- Others

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.6 %

1.2 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

13.6

15.1

12.1

15.3

18.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- La Fantana

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

16.9

79.2 %

82.7 %

90.9 %

92.2 %

92.6 %

- Odmenjska

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

1.4

18.6 %

17.2 %

9.1 %

7.8 %

7.4 %

- Voda Voda

0.3

0.0

2.2 %

0.0 %

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Spring

- Table
- Zdrava Vo2da

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Arteska International

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

- Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Ekofarm

4.3

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

28.2 %

13.2 %

9.8 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

- Odmenjska

4.3

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

28.2 %

13.2 %

9.8 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

- Eko

1.7

2.0

2.0

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

- Aqua Una

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

- La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Nectar

1.7

1.1

6.0 %

3.3 %

- Eko

1.7

1.1

6.0 %

3.3 %

Total

Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

- Vmjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Zdrava Vo2da

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

- Eko

1.7

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

- Aqua Una

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

- La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Others

3.1

1.7

1.7

0.7

0.8

20.3 %

8.8 %

6.3 %

2.7 %

2.3 %

- Odmenjska

2.6

1.5

1.6

0.7

0.7

16.9 %

7.9 %

5.9 %

2.4 %

2.1 %

- Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Strategic Trade and


Distribution

1.7

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.5

11.3 %

5.3 %

3.9 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

- Odmenjska

1.7

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.5

11.3 %

5.3 %

3.9 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

- Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

- Vmjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Zdrava Vo2da

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Ekofarm

4.3

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

28.2 %

13.2 %

9.8 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

1.7

1.1

6.0 %

3.3 %

Total

Nectar
Vrnjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2

0.3

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

Arteska International

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.1

PDF Editor

0.1

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

Total

Vrnjacko Vrelo
Strategic Trade and
Distribution

1.7

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.5

11.3 %

5.3 %

3.9 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Others

3.1

1.7

1.7

20.3 %

8.8 %

6.3 %

2.7 %

2.3 %

0.7

0.8

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Still

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Refillable

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Refillable

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Still

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Bulk/HOD Water

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- Bubble Top

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- 1500cl

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- Polycarbonate

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- Bubble Top

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- 1890cl

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- PET

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Bulk/HOD Water

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Refillable

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- Bubble Top

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- 1500cl

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.4

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7 %

3.3 %

- Polycarbonate

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- Bubble Top

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- 1890cl

18.7

25.9

26.6

32.6

40.2

97.4 %

97.0 %

96.4 %

96.3 %

96.7 %

- PET

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

19.2

26.7

27.5

33.8

41.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

1.0

1.2

1.0

2.1

3.0

5.2 %

4.5 %

3.6 %

6.3 %

7.2 %

On-Premise

18.2

25.5

26.5

31.7

38.6

94.8 %

95.5 %

96.4 %

93.7 %

92.8 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Carbonates Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ............................................................ 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Carbonates Trademarks 2008-2010 ..................................................................................................... 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Carbonates New Products 2010 ......................................................................................................................... 5
Carbonates New Products Photo Shots 2010 .................................................................................................... 6
Carbonates Franchise Structure ......................................................................................................................... 6
Carbonates Trademark Owners and Local Operators ........................................................................................ 7
Carbonates Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ........................................................................................ 7
Carbonates Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ........................................................................................ 9
Carbonates Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ................................................................................. 9
Carbonates Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F .......................................................................... 9
Carbonates Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F .......................................................................................... 10
Carbonates Regular vs Low Calorie, 2007-2011F ............................................................................................ 10
Carbonates All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................................... 11
Carbonates Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................................... 12
Carbonates Low Calorie Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 .................................................................................. 18
Carbonates Private Label Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ................................................................................ 19
Carbonates All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................... 19
Carbonates All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ..................................................................................................... 20
Carbonates Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010....................................................................................... 22
Carbonates Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................ 23
Carbonates Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ................................................... 23
Carbonates Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F................................................................................ 24

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

444.4

60.6

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

2.3 %

-0.7 %

2.0 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

36,868.96

82.96

512.80

1.15

Regular

Low Calorie

97.9 %

2.1 %

Off-Premise

On-Premise

93.9 %

6.1 %

PET

Glass

Metal

90.6 %

5.1 %

4.3 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010
% Share
Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


After an 11% drop in 2009, 2% growth was recorded in 2010. It was driven by the slight recovery of consumer
confidence and permanent Coca-Cola marketing activity, which helped Coca-Cola to grow above the
category, by 3%.
After the decline of low calorie products in 2009 the trend continued, with the segment shrinking by 25%
despite heavy marketing by Coca-Cola Zero.

Outlook
Slow growth of 2% is foreseen for 2011. This is still much lower than the 2008 figure, which will be hard to
reach in coming years. The battle against obesity and health campaigns will prevent higher volumes in this
category.
Consumer concerns about health and obesity (which appear to be focused on carbonates rather than other
soft drinks categories) are likely to remain in place and will continue to threaten growth in the category,
particularly as other categories boast more healthy alternatives.

Segmentation
Cola dominated the market, with 75% of the overall share. Orange held a 13% share, but has been declining
in favour of flavour mixes. The share of tonic, mixers and bitters remained stable.
The low calorie segment, lead by Coca-Colas strong print and PR activity, registered high volumes in the
past. This did not repeat in 2010. Coca-Cola light was being phased out and the sharp drop of Coca-Cola
Zeros share was not picked up by other brands.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola

177.7

177.3

181.1

Pepsi-Cola

PepsiCo

76.9

57.7

61.5

Fanta

Coca-Cola

29.6

30.4

34.5

Frutella

Rodic

58.5

53.1

32.3

Sinalco

Sinalco

46.1

32.2

28.1

Cockta

Droga Kolinska

16.5

15.2

19.0

Schweppes

Coca-Cola

21.9

19.9

19.0

Vrncji

Voda Vrnjci

16.6

14.4

14.8

Na Eks

Bahus

Golf

Knjaz Milos

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

10.6
6.2

5.6

10.4

Coca-Cola was the clear leader, with 55% of the market share. Pepsi-Cola (rebranded label), Frutella
(regained positions in Hyper Cort and Rodic-Mercator), Cockta (new cola/lime flavour and new owner
distribution power) and Golf Knjaz Milos (exploiting its position in package water) competed for share.
After changing licence owner and bottler, Sinalco still struggled to set up a sustainable business model. Si&Si
were forced to sell the distribution rights to Unija Distributer Srbije in 2010, due to liquidity problems.
Bahus was new to the market in 2010, with its brand Na Eks. Locally distributed in central Serbia in the past, it
became the leader in the low end discount segment during the past two years. Not just driven by the
economic crisis, the company also marketed the Na Eks brand with point of sale activity, coolers and a range
of flavours. Bahus also developed strong negotiation positions in key accounts as the Private Label supplier.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Private Label lines grew by 12%, but were still a long way below the branded products share. Since they did
not make any expected progress during this price sensitive period, it is hard to believe that it will happen in the
near future.
The carbonates category is to be excluded from Delta Maxis latest plans to invest more in its Private Label
line.

Marketing
TCCC had permanent marketing activity during the year and invested more heavily than all of the other
brands combined. Mostly focussing on global events, such as the FIFA World Cup, brought positive
consumption and was also supported by summer weather conditions.
In the off-premise, the key focus was multi-packs, while in on-premise, defending its strong position, PepsiCo
continued with outdoor campaigns and on-pack promotions, while Cocktas strategy was to be strong in the
Horeca channel, to try and have a better brand image and additional off-premise volumes too.
Other brands remained dedicated to in shop visibility and pricing strategies.

Pricing/Valuation
Prices went up by 9% in 2010. Coca-Cola was still the highest priced brand, followed by Pepsi-Cola.
Over the years, producers were trying to set and maintain a minimum recommended price in order to protect
retail margins. Unfortunately, during the crisis this policy was not fully respected.

Packaging
PET was the dominant pack type with a 91% share. Multi-pack promotions (TCCC 4 x 200cl) and price
discounts drove growth.
As Horeca was under pressure from the economic situation, can and glass fell by 19% and 9% respectfully.
Glass was also suffering due to the competition from PET.

PDF Editor

Distribution
Off-premise grew by 2%, driven by the 13% growth of large modern retailers. Urban living, bulk shopping over
the weekend, supported by retailers own promotional and pricing campaigns supported the growth.
Prices in both convenience stores and traditional retailers increased, causing a drop in both segments
volume.
After a poor 2009, small growth in EDA was not promising. Besides leading TCCC brands, Cockta (Droga
Kolinska) was still prospering in on-premise, while PepsiCo lost share.
QSR and vending growth was positive as it is very compatible with modern living habits; despite the growth,
the segment still held a small share of the total.

New Products 2010

Pack
Type/Size
25cl glass

Price
RSD49.06

Comment
Imported from Bosnia
(Orangina producer, (See
Figure 1)

Cola/lime

50cl PET
150cl PET

RSD49.99
RSD82.99

New flavour (see Figure 2)

Feshta

Cola, orange, exotic

200cl PET

RSD49.81

New product from low end


segment (see figure 3)

Fruvita

Hello!
Oranzada

Orange/lemon/mandarin

50cl PET
150cl PET

RSD32.40
RSD42.44

New trademark brand

PepsiCo

Pepsi-Cola

Cola

50cl PET
100cl PET

RSD44.99
RSD64.99
RSD82.00

Redesigned label

Company
Bob-Pro doo

Brand
Limona

Flavour(s)
Lemon-lime

Droga Kolinska

Cockta

Elixir natura

200cl PET

Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Figure 1: Limona

Figure 2 : Cockta Lime

Figure 3 : Feshta

Source : Canadean

COMPANY (BRAND
OWNER)

BRAND

FRANCHISEE

COMMENTS

Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola Light
Coca-Cola Zero
Fanta
Fanta Shokata
Schweppes
Schweppes Bitter
Lemon
Sprite

IBP

Includes Rosa Vlasinka acquired by CocaCola and CCHBC in 2005 and Fresh & Co
acquired in 2006.

PepsiCo

7-Up
Evervess
Ivi
Ivi Ricolo
Mirinda
Pepsi-Cola
Pepsi Diet/Light

A&P

A&P discontinued own carbonates range in


2006, focusing exclusively on PepsiCo
portfolio

Pepsi Max
Pepsi Twist
SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

7-Up

PepsiCo

A&P

Alpela

Rodic

Rodic

Bip

Bip Belgrade

Bip Belgrade

Bipsi

Bip Belgrade

Bip Belgrade

Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola

IBP

Cockta

Droga Kolinska

Palanacki Kiseljack

Elixir Natura

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

Voda Vrnjci

Evervess

PepsiCo

A&P

Fanta

Coca-Cola

IBP

Frutella

Rodic

Rodic

Golf

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Ivi

PepsiCo

A&P

Jupi

Droga Kolinska

Palanacki Kiseljack

Minaqua

Minaqua

Minaqua

Mirinda

PepsiCo

A&P

Na Eks

Bahus

Voda Vrnjci

Pepsi-Cola

PepsiCo

A&P

Schweppes

Coca-Cola

IBP

Sinalco

Sinalco

Unija Distributera Srbije

Sprite

Coca-Cola

IBP

Vrncji

Voda Vrnjci

Voda Vrnjci

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

25

COCA-COLA RANGE

31.27

34.41

36.58

125.08

25

PEPSI-COLA RANGE

21.20

24.21

26.90

25

35.27

41.50

43.58

100

SCHWEPPES BITTER LEMON,


TONIC
COCA-COLA RANGE

100

PEPSI-COLA

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
RB GLASS

NRPET

55.90

137.64

146.32

84.80

96.84

107.60

141.08

166.00

174.32

37.00

39.00

55.90
37.00

39.00

33

FRUTELLA (RODIC)

17.40

18.44

52.73

55.88

50

COCA-COLA RANGE

49.90

54.99

56.90

99.80

109.98

113.80

50

GOLF

27.90

32.40

33.58

55.80

64.80

67.16

50

PEPSI RANGE

42.50

43.90

46.90

85.00

87.80

93.80

PDF Editor

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

SCHWEPPES BITTER LEMON,


TONIC
VRNJCI COLA

54.90

109.80

100

COCA-COLA

55.90

100
150
150

COCKTA, JUPI

61.50

65.70

150

FRUTELLA (RODIC)

38.11

38.00

40.00

150

GOLF (KNJAZ MILOS)

45.44

47.63

150

PEPSI-COLA

77.90

150

94.90

200

SCHWEPPES BITTER LEMON,


TONIC
ARO (METRO)

200

COCA-COLA RANGE

95.00

200

COCKTA, JUPI

200

FAVOLA (MAXI)

200

FRUTELLA (RODIC)

200
200
200

SINALCO RANGE

200

TOP BUDGET (INTEREX)

200

VRNJCI COLA

250

PEPSI-COLA

88.00

33

COCA-COLA RANGE

47.90

52.99

55.90

33

IVI

33.61

34.50

33

PEPSI-COLA RANGE

40.90

41.90

33

SCHWEPPES

52.89

54.90

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

BRAND

50
50

CAN

53.09

62.90

106.18

125.80

29.00

33.00

66.99

75.90

58.00

66.00

66.99

75.90

PEPSI-COLA

54.73

BIPSI

43.00

57.90

54.73

57.90

46.00

28.67

30.67

94.99

95.90

38.60

40.60

97.00

105.00

43.80

25.41

25.33

26.67

30.29

31.75

63.33

63.93

19.30

20.30

48.50

52.50

63.27

47.50

99.90
64.90

60.70

63.90

K PLUS ( IDEA)

54.99

PEPSI RANGE

79.00
86.90

99.90

44.00

48.00

58.30

62.90

PDF Editor

41.00

51.93

59.90

SOURCE : Canadean

55.90

47.24

81.90

49.95
29.95

32.45

30.35

31.95

56.99

27.50

28.50

88.00

39.50

44.00

43.45

49.95

22.00

24.00

29.15

31.45

145.15

160.58

169.39

49.90

101.85

104.55

151.21

49.90

123.94

126.97

151.21

160.27

166.36

23.62

40.95

35.20

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

25

FANTA

135.00

540.00

25

ORANGINA

180.00

25

PEPSI-COLA/COCA-COLA

130.00

135.00

150.00

40

MCDONALDS; COCA-COLA

90.00

90.00

100.00

50

COCA-COLA

105.00

85.00

50

COCKTA

110.00

50

FANTA

100.00

33

PEPSI-COLA/COCA-COLA (LIGHT)

33

SPRITE/7-UP

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
GLASS

PET

CAN

132.00

140.00

528.00

560.00

520.00

540.00

600.00

225.00

225.00

250.00

90.00

210.00

170.00

180.00

80.00

90.00

220.00

160.00

180.00

85.00

90.00

200.00

170.00

180.00

140.00

145.00

155.00

424.24

439.39

469.70

170.00

165.00

170.00

515.15

500.00

515.15

720.00

SOURCE : Canadean

Production
Imports
Exports
Consumption

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

265.8

311.0

371.0

459.6

467.1

468.6

500.5

553.8

601.7

522.1

508.1

512.4

3.9

10.1

9.3

13.8

4.6

2.7

2.2

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.0

8.8

6.2

8.0

25.8

13.3

75.3

83.9

100.5

115.1

86.4

63.7

59.4

260.9

314.9

372.3

447.5

458.4

396.0

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

100.5

115.1

86.4

63.7

59.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Kosovo

48.8

59.5

43.2

31.2

29.0

48.5 %

51.7 %

50.0 %

49.0 %

48.8 %

Montenegro

40.1

43.9

33.4

24.1

21.0

39.9 %

38.1 %

38.7 %

37.8 %

35.4 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina

4.8

5.1

4.6

4.8

5.6

4.8 %

4.4 %

5.3 %

7.5 %

9.4 %

Macedonia

6.3

6.0

4.8

3.3

3.5

6.3 %

5.2 %

5.6 %

5.2 %

5.9 %

Others

0.5

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cola

319.4

354.1

317.8

333.4

342.1

70.4 %

72.7 %

72.9 %

75.0 %

75.5 %

Orange

71.6

73.2

66.3

56.4

59.0

15.8 %

15.0 %

15.2 %

12.7 %

13.0 %

Tonic, Mixers and Bitters

28.8

27.9

24.2

23.8

20.3

6.3 %

5.7 %

5.5 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

Lemon-Lime

9.3

11.3

12.6

12.7

12.9

2.0 %

2.3 %

2.9 %

2.9 %

2.8 %

Flavour Mixes

9.0

8.2

6.5

9.0

9.5

2.0 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

2.0 %

2.1 %

Herbs and Spices

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

5.0

0.9 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

Other Non Fruit

2.8

1.9

1.8

1.8

1.7

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Lemon

2.5

2.4

1.7

1.7

1.7

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Clear Lemonade

3.3

2.1

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Other Fruit

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Peach

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Apple

2.3

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

2.2

0.2

0.0

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Pineapple
Grape

0.5

Mango

0.1

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Cola

319.4

354.1

317.8

333.4

342.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

306.3

334.3

305.4

324.1

333.4

95.9 %

94.4 %

96.1 %

97.2 %

97.5 %

- Low Calorie

13.1

19.8

12.4

9.3

8.7

4.1 %

5.6 %

3.9 %

2.8 %

2.5 %

Total Orange

71.6

73.2

66.3

56.4

59.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

71.6

73.2

66.3

56.4

59.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Tonic, Mixers and


Bitters

28.8

27.9

24.2

23.8

20.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

27.3

27.9

24.2

23.8

20.3

94.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Low Calorie

1.5

5.3 %

Total Lemon-Lime

9.3

11.3

12.6

12.7

12.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

9.3

11.3

12.6

12.7

12.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Flavour Mixes

9.0

8.2

6.5

9.0

9.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

9.0

8.2

6.5

9.0

9.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Herbs and Spices

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

5.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Regular

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

5.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Other Non Fruit

2.8

1.9

1.8

1.8

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

2.8

1.9

1.8

1.8

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Lemon

2.5

2.4

1.7

1.7

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

2.5

2.4

1.7

1.7

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Clear Lemonade

3.3

2.1

0.5

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

3.3

2.1

0.5

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Other Fruit

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Peach

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Apple

2.3

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Regular

2.3

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Pineapple

2.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Regular

2.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

Total Grape

0.5

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Regular

0.5

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Mango

0.1

100.0 %

- Regular

0.1

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

33.6 %

36.4 %

36.5 %

40.7 %

40.7 %

Pepsi-Cola

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

13.7 %

13.5 %

15.8 %

13.2 %

13.8 %

Fanta

25.5

29.6

29.6

30.4

34.5

6.1 %

6.5 %

6.1 %

7.0 %

7.8 %

Frutella

68.4

64.4

58.5

53.1

32.3

16.3 %

14.2 %

12.0 %

12.2 %

7.3 %

Sinalco

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

28.1

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

6.3 %

Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.3 %

Schweppes

16.6

22.6

21.9

19.9

19.0

4.0 %

5.0 %

4.5 %

4.6 %

4.3 %

Vrncji

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

Na Eks

10.6

2.4 %

Golf

4.4

6.8

6.2

5.6

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

Sprite

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

1.2 %

1.4 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

Mirinda

5.0

5.6

4.7

4.3

4.5

1.2 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3 %

Elixir Natura

1.1

0.2 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Bipsi

3.1

2.2

1.4

0.5

0.3

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Ivi

1.6

1.0

1.3

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Alpina (Alpina)

2.3

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Apa

1.9

3.0

2.0

1.4

0.0

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Knjaz Milos
Em

0.3

0.1

Hevita

3.1

1.6

Lex

0.0

Yu

0.6

Jagodinska Pivara
Others
Other Private Label

0.7

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.0 %
0.6

0.1 %

0.1

0.1

20.2

10.6

8.0

7.0

9.4

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.1 %
0.0 %

0.0 %

4.8 %

2.3 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

2.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Cola

296.4

319.4

354.1

317.8

333.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Coca-Cola

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

47.5 %

51.7 %

50.2 %

55.8 %

54.3 %

- Coca-Cola

135.7

159.1

165.6

168.5

175.3

45.8 %

49.8 %

46.8 %

53.0 %

52.6 %

10.9

7.2

5.8

3.1 %

2.3 %

1.7 %

- Coca-Cola Zero
- Coca-Cola Light

5.1

6.0

1.2

1.6

0.0

1.7 %

1.9 %

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Pepsi-Cola

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

19.3 %

19.2 %

21.7 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

- Pepsi-Cola

47.2

49.6

63.1

47.2

50.0

15.9 %

15.5 %

17.8 %

14.9 %

15.0 %

- Pepsi Twist

3.8

5.4

7.6

7.2

8.0

1.3 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

2.3 %

2.4 %

- Pepsi Max

3.9

3.8

3.9

2.1

2.2

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Pepsi-Cola Light

2.4

2.5

2.2

1.2

1.3

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Sinalco

19.7

26.0

38.8

29.2

25.4

6.6 %

8.1 %

10.9 %

9.2 %

7.6 %

- Sinalco

19.7

26.0

38.8

29.2

25.4

6.6 %

8.1 %

10.9 %

9.2 %

7.6 %

- Frutella

38.7

35.6

30.5

26.5

23.4

13.1 %

11.1 %

8.6 %

8.3 %

7.0 %

- Frutella

38.7

35.6

30.5

26.5

23.4

13.1 %

11.1 %

8.6 %

8.3 %

7.0 %

- Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

3.6 %

4.0 %

4.7 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

3.6 %

4.0 %

4.7 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- Others

14.0

5.3

3.0

4.1

6.1

4.7 %

1.7 %

0.8 %

1.3 %

1.8 %

- Others

14.0

5.3

3.0

4.1

6.1

4.7 %

1.7 %

0.8 %

1.3 %

1.8 %

- Golf

4.4

3.9

3.2

2.8

5.2

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

1.5 %

- Golf

4.4

3.9

3.2

2.8

5.2

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

1.5 %

- Vrncji

3.6

3.6

4.8

4.7

4.8

1.2 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

- Vrncji

3.6

3.6

4.8

4.7

4.8

1.2 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

- Na Eks

6.1

1.8 %

- Na Eks

6.1

1.8 %

- Minaqua

2.3

3.1

2.0

0.3

0.3

0.8 %

1.0 %

0.6 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Minaqua

2.3

3.1

2.0

0.3

0.3

0.8 %

1.0 %

0.6 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bipsi

1.0

0.6

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

1.0

0.6

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Elixir Natura

0.5

0.1 %

- Feshta

0.5

0.1 %

- Yu

0.6

0.6

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Yu

0.6

0.6

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Apa

1.5

0.7

0.5 %

0.2 %

- Apa

1.5

0.7

0.5 %

0.2 %

- Em

0.2

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Em

0.2

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Hevita

1.7

0.9

0.5

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Hevita

1.7

0.9

0.5

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Total Orange

69.2

71.6

73.2

66.3

56.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Fanta

16.1

20.7

23.0

24.5

27.0

23.3 %

28.9 %

31.4 %

37.0 %

47.9 %

- Fanta

16.1

20.7

23.0

24.5

27.0

23.3 %

28.9 %

31.4 %

37.0 %

47.9 %

- Frutella

27.6

27.0

26.2

25.1

7.3

39.9 %

37.7 %

35.8 %

37.8 %

12.9 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.6

27.0

26.2

25.1

7.3

39.9 %

37.7 %

35.8 %

37.8 %

12.9 %

- Golf

2.9

3.0

2.8

5.2

4.1 %

4.1 %

4.2 %

9.2 %

- Golf

2.9

3.0

2.8

5.2

4.1 %

4.1 %

4.2 %

9.2 %

- Frutella

- Mirinda

4.0

4.3

4.0

3.6

3.8

5.8 %

6.0 %

5.5 %

5.4 %

6.8 %

- Mirinda

4.0

4.3

4.0

3.6

3.8

5.8 %

6.0 %

5.5 %

5.4 %

6.8 %

- Vrncji

2.4

2.6

3.8

3.4

3.6

3.5 %

3.6 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

6.4 %

- Vrncji

2.4

2.6

3.8

3.4

3.6

3.5 %

3.6 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

6.4 %

- Sinalco

10.1

6.7

5.9

2.3

2.0

14.6 %

9.4 %

8.1 %

3.5 %

3.6 %

- Sinalco

10.1

6.7

5.9

2.3

2.0

14.6 %

9.4 %

8.1 %

3.5 %

3.6 %

- Others

3.2

3.2

2.2

1.4

1.6

4.6 %

4.5 %

3.0 %

2.1 %

2.9 %

- Others

3.2

3.2

2.2

1.4

1.6

4.6 %

4.5 %

3.0 %

2.1 %

2.9 %

- Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

2.3 %

- Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

2.3 %

- Schweppes

1.8

1.9

1.8

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.1 %

- Schweppes

1.8

1.9

1.8

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.1 %

- Minaqua

1.4

1.9

1.6

0.6

0.5

2.0 %

2.7 %

2.2 %

0.8 %

1.0 %

- Minaqua

1.4

1.9

1.6

0.6

0.5

2.0 %

2.7 %

2.2 %

0.8 %

1.0 %

- Other Private Label

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

- Other PL

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

- Na Eks

1.3

2.3 %

- Na Eks

1.3

2.3 %

- Bipsi

1.1

0.7

0.4

0.3

0.2

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Bipsi

1.1

0.7

0.4

0.3

0.2

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Elixir Natura

0.3

0.5 %

- Feshta

0.3

0.5 %

- Apa

0.4

0.1

0.6 %

0.1 %

- Apa

0.4

0.1

0.6 %

0.1 %

- Em

0.1

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Em

0.1

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Ivi

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.0

1.1 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Ivi Ricoco

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.0

1.0 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Ivi

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

- Hevita

1.2

0.5

- Hevita

1.2

Total Tonic, Mixers and


Bitters
- Schweppes
- Schweppes
Lemon

Bitter

- Schweppes
- Schweppes
Orange

% Share
2006

2007

2008

0.2

1.7 %

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.5

0.2

1.7 %

0.7 %

0.3 %

20.5

28.8

27.9

24.2

23.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

14.4

20.5

19.3

18.0

17.2

69.9 %

11.5

14.5

16.4

15.4

14.7

2.9

2.9

2.9

2.6

2.5

Bitter

- Schweppes Soda

2009

2010

2009

2010

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

71.0 %

69.2 %

74.6 %

72.3 %

55.8 %

50.4 %

58.9 %

63.6 %

61.6 %

14.1 %

10.2 %

10.3 %

11.0 %

10.7 %

1.5

5.3 %

1.5

5.2 %

- Frutella

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.5

1.7

10.2 %

6.2 %

6.5 %

6.0 %

7.0 %

- Frutella

2.1

1.8

1.8

1.5

1.7

10.2 %

6.2 %

6.5 %

6.0 %

7.0 %

- Vrncji

0.8

0.8

1.2

1.3

1.3

3.8 %

2.7 %

4.3 %

5.2 %

5.6 %

- Vrncji

0.8

0.8

1.2

1.3

1.3

3.8 %

2.7 %

4.3 %

5.2 %

5.6 %

- Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

5.2 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

- Evervess Bitter Lemon

1.0

1.8

1.8

1.1

1.3

4.6 %

6.4 %

6.5 %

4.6 %

5.4 %

- Evervess

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

- Sinalco

0.2

0.7

1.1

0.7

0.6

1.1 %

2.3 %

4.1 %

2.7 %

2.6 %

- Sinalco

0.2

0.7

1.1

0.7

0.6

1.1 %

2.3 %

4.1 %

2.7 %

2.6 %

- Na Eks

1.6

6.8 %

- Na Eks

1.6

6.8 %

- Minaqua

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Minaqua

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Bipsi

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0

1.7 %

0.8 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0

1.7 %

0.8 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Apa

2.2

2.0

1.4

0.0

7.6 %

7.0 %

5.8 %

0.0 %

- Apa

2.2

2.0

1.4

0.0

7.6 %

7.0 %

5.8 %

0.0 %

- Lex

0.0

0.1 %

- Lex

0.0

0.1 %

- Hevita

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Hevita

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.2 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

- Others

1.5

0.4

- Others

1.5

Total Lemon-Lime

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.1

7.3 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.4

0.1

7.3 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

7.2

9.3

11.3

12.6

12.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Sprite

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

71.0 %

70.9 %

73.1 %

75.0 %

75.0 %

- Sprite

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

71.0 %

70.9 %

73.1 %

75.0 %

75.0 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

15.9 %

20.5 %

20.1 %

19.4 %

19.2 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

15.9 %

20.5 %

20.1 %

19.4 %

19.2 %

- Vrncji

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.7

8.9 %

8.6 %

6.8 %

5.6 %

5.8 %

- Vrncji

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.7

8.9 %

8.6 %

6.8 %

5.6 %

5.8 %

- Others

0.3

4.2 %

- Others

0.3

4.2 %

Total Flavour Mixes

7.9

9.0

8.2

6.5

9.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Vrncji

4.8

5.7

6.0

4.3

4.4

61.1 %

63.1 %

72.9 %

66.1 %

48.6 %

- Vrncji

4.8

5.7

6.0

4.3

4.4

61.1 %

63.1 %

72.9 %

66.1 %

48.6 %

- Fanta

2.6

2.7

1.7

2.1

2.7

33.6 %

30.2 %

21.0 %

32.4 %

30.6 %

- Fanta

2.6

2.7

1.7

2.1

2.7

33.6 %

30.2 %

21.0 %

32.4 %

30.6 %

- Na Eks

1.5

17.1 %

- Na Eks

1.5

17.1 %

- Elixir Natura

0.3

3.7 %

- Feshta

0.3

3.7 %

- Bipsi

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.1

0.0

5.3 %

6.6 %

6.1 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.1

0.0

5.3 %

6.6 %

6.1 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

Total Herbs and Spices

4.3

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Fanta

4.3

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Fanta Shokata

4.3

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Other Non Fruit

4.4

2.8

1.9

1.8

1.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

32.2 %

48.2 %

79.3 %

84.7 %

96.4 %

- Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

32.2 %

48.2 %

79.3 %

84.7 %

96.4 %

- Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

14.7 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

- Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

14.7 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

- Alpina (Alpina)

2.3

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

53.1 %

43.2 %

11.4 %

11.3 %

0.0 %

- Alpina (Alpina)

2.3

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

53.1 %

43.2 %

11.4 %

11.3 %

0.0 %

Total Lemon

4.8

2.5

2.4

1.7

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Others

0.2

0.4

0.9

0.7

0.8

4.2 %

16.2 %

39.6 %

41.3 %

47.6 %

- Others

0.2

0.4

0.9

0.7

0.8

4.2 %

16.2 %

39.6 %

41.3 %

47.6 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.8

0.6

10.4 %

23.8 %

26.5 %

44.4 %

39.1 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.8

0.6

10.4 %

23.8 %

26.5 %

44.4 %

39.1 %

- Ivi

0.7

0.4

0.4

0.1

0.1

15.3 %

17.0 %

19.0 %

7.4 %

8.1 %

- Ivi

0.7

0.4

0.4

0.1

0.1

15.3 %

17.0 %

19.0 %

7.4 %

8.1 %

- Sinalco

0.6

0.6

0.3

0.1

0.1

11.4 %

22.3 %

12.7 %

5.8 %

5.1 %

- Sinalco

0.6

0.6

0.3

0.1

0.1

11.4 %

22.3 %

12.7 %

5.8 %

5.1 %

- Bipsi

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

4.1 %

3.2 %

2.1 %

1.2 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

4.1 %

3.2 %

2.1 %

1.2 %

0.0 %

- Minaqua

0.2

0.3

4.2 %

12.2 %

- Minaqua

0.2

0.3

4.2 %

12.2 %

- Fanta

2.4

0.1

50.5 %

5.2 %

- Fanta

2.4

0.1

50.5 %

5.2 %

Total Other Fruit

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.2

0.5

0.4

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Peach

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Ivi

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Ivi

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Pineapple

2.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Fanta

2.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Fanta

2.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

Total Cherry

0.0

100.0 %

- Fanta

0.0

100.0 %

- Fanta

0.0

100.0 %

Total Clear Lemonade

3.2

3.3

2.1

0.5

0.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

1.0

1.1

1.3

0.5

0.5

30.9 %

33.6 %

63.1 %

97.5 %

100.0 %

- Others

1.0

1.1

1.3

0.5

0.5

30.9 %

33.6 %

63.1 %

97.5 %

100.0 %

- Schweppes

2.2

2.2

0.8

0.0

69.1 %

66.4 %

36.9 %

2.5 %

- Schweppes

2.2

2.2

0.8

0.0

69.1 %

66.4 %

36.9 %

2.5 %

Total Mango

0.3

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Hevita

0.3

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

- Hevita

2006

2007

0.3

0.1

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

100.0 %

100.0 %

2008

2009

2010

Total Grape

0.5

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

0.2

0.2

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Knjaz Milos

0.2

0.2

0.0

99.9 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Knjaz Milos

0.2

0.2

0.0

99.9 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

Total Apple

0.5

100.0 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.3

100.0 %

11.0 %

- Mirinda

0.5

0.3

100.0 %

11.0 %

- Fanta

2.0

0.0

89.0 %

0.1 %

- Fanta

2.0

0.0

89.0 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

11.8

14.6

19.8

12.4

9.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Cola

11.8

13.1

19.8

12.4

9.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Pepsi-Cola

6.3

6.3

6.1

3.3

3.5

53.7 %

48.0 %

30.8 %

26.9 %

37.7 %

- Pepsi Max

3.9

3.8

3.9

2.1

2.2

33.1 %

29.1 %

19.8 %

17.2 %

23.3 %

- Pepsi-Cola Light

2.4

2.5

2.2

1.2

1.3

20.7 %

19.0 %

11.0 %

9.7 %

14.3 %

- Coca-Cola

5.1

6.0

12.1

8.8

5.8

43.7 %

45.5 %

61.0 %

71.1 %

62.3 %

10.9

7.2

5.8

55.2 %

58.3 %

62.2 %

- Coca-Cola Zero
- Coca-Cola Light

5.1

6.0

1.2

1.6

0.0

43.7 %

45.5 %

5.8 %

12.8 %

0.1 %

- Sinalco

0.3

0.9

1.6

0.3

0.0

2.5 %

6.5 %

8.2 %

2.0 %

0.0 %

- Sinalco

0.3

0.9

1.6

0.3

0.0

2.5 %

6.5 %

8.2 %

2.0 %

0.0 %

Total Tonic, Mixers and


Bitters

1.5

100.0 %

- Schweppes

1.5

100.0 %

1.5

100.0 %

- Schweppes
Orange

Bitter

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Orange

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Other PL

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

0.0

0.0 %

- Lex

0.0

0.0 %

A-BInBev

1.6

0.0

0.4 %

0.0 %

- Alpina (Alpina)

0.2

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Apa

1.4

0.0

0.3 %

0.0 %

Bahus

10.6

2.4 %

- Na Eks

10.6

2.4 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

3.1

2.2

1.4

0.5

0.3

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Coca-Cola

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

- Coca-Cola

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

33.6 %

36.4 %

36.5 %

40.7 %

40.7 %

- Fanta

25.5

29.6

29.6

30.4

34.5

6.1 %

6.5 %

6.1 %

7.0 %

7.8 %

- Schweppes

16.6

22.6

21.9

19.9

19.0

4.0 %

5.0 %

4.5 %

4.6 %

4.3 %

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

1.2 %

1.4 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

Droga Kolinska

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

- Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.3 %

- Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3 %

- Yu

0.6

0.6

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Sprite

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

1.1

0.2 %

- Elixir Natura

1.1

0.2 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Hevita

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

InBev

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

- Alpina (Alpina)

2.3

1.2

0.2

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

1.9

3.0

2.0

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

- Jagodinska Pivara

- Apa

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

2009

2010

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

- Golf

4.4

6.8

6.2

5.6

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Knjaz Milos
Meridjian

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Em

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

20.4

10.8

8.3

7.3

9.8

4.9 %

2.4 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Others

20.2

10.6

8.0

7.0

9.4

4.8 %

2.3 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

2.1 %

PepsiCo

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Ivi

1.6

1.0

1.3

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Mirinda

5.0

5.6

4.7

4.3

4.5

1.2 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- Pepsi-Cola

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

13.7 %

13.5 %

15.8 %

13.2 %

13.8 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

- Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

- Frutella

68.4

64.4

58.5

53.1

32.3

16.3 %

14.2 %

12.0 %

12.2 %

7.3 %

Sinalco

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

28.1

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

6.3 %

- Sinalco

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

28.1

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

6.3 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

- Vrncji

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

Others
- Other Private Label

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Ivi

1.6

1.0

1.3

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Lex

0.0

- Mirinda

5.0

5.6

4.7

4.3

4.5

1.2 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

13.7 %

13.5 %

15.8 %

13.2 %

13.8 %

Apatinska Pivara

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.6

0.0

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

- Alpina (Alpina)

2.3

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Apa

1.9

3.0

2.0

1.4

0.0

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

3.1

2.2

1.4

0.5

0.3

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Hevita

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

IBP

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

- Coca-Cola

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

33.6 %

36.4 %

36.5 %

40.7 %

40.7 %

- Fanta

25.5

29.6

29.6

30.4

34.5

6.1 %

6.5 %

6.1 %

7.0 %

7.8 %

- Schweppes

16.6

22.6

21.9

19.9

19.0

4.0 %

5.0 %

4.5 %

4.6 %

4.3 %

- Sprite

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

1.2 %

1.4 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

- Golf

4.4

6.8

6.2

5.6

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Pepsi-Cola

0.0 %

- Knjaz Milos
Meridjian

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Em

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

20.4

10.8

8.3

7.3

9.8

4.9 %

2.4 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Others

20.2

10.6

8.0

7.0

9.4

4.8 %

2.3 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

2.1 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

- Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.3 %

- Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3 %

- Yu

0.6

0.6

0.1 %

0.1 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

- Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

- Frutella

68.4

64.4

58.5

53.1

32.3

16.3 %

14.2 %

12.0 %

12.2 %

7.3 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

Others
- Other Private Label

PDF Editor

Million Litres

- Sinalco

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

2010

Unija Distributera Srbije

28.1

6.3 %

- Sinalco

28.1

6.3 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.6

16.7

14.4

- Elixir Natura

26.5

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

1.1

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.2 %

0.1

0.0 %

- Na Eks

0.0 %

10.6

- Vrncji

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

6.0 %

2.4 %
2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

PepsiCo

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

Sinalco

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

28.1

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

6.3 %

Droga Kolinska

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

Bahus

10.6

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

10.4

2.4 %
1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.1

2.3 %
0.2 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

1.6

0.0

0.4 %

0.0 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

A-BInBev
Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

InBev

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Meridjian

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

A&P

0.0

Others

20.4

0.0 %
10.8

8.3

7.3

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

9.8

4.9 %

2.4 %

1.7 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

IBP

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

A&P

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

Unija Distributera Srbije

28.1

6.3 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.6

16.7

14.4

26.5

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

6.0 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Apatinska Pivara

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.6

0.0

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Meridjian

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

Others

20.4

10.8

8.3

7.3

4.9 %

2.4 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

9.8

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Carbonates

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.5

453.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

420.1

455.8

409.0

419.3

426.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Bottle

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 25cl

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Metal

22.1

25.0

20.2

16.4

16.5

4.9 %

5.1 %

4.6 %

3.7 %

3.6 %

- Tank

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 1800cl

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

22.0

25.0

20.1

16.4

16.5

4.9 %

5.1 %

4.6 %

3.7 %

3.6 %

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 25cl

0.8

1.0

0.8

1.4

1.4

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- 33cl

21.2

24.0

19.3

14.9

15.0

4.7 %

4.9 %

4.4 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

- Glass

- Can
- 15cl

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

397.8

430.7

388.6

402.9

409.9

87.6 %

88.4 %

89.2 %

90.6 %

90.5 %

397.8

430.7

388.6

402.9

409.9

87.6 %

88.4 %

89.2 %

90.6 %

90.5 %

- 33cl

3.7

3.1

1.2

1.9

2.0

0.8 %

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- 50cl

21.6

23.2

22.1

21.3

21.5

4.7 %

4.8 %

5.1 %

4.8 %

4.7 %

- PET
- Bottle

- 70cl

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 100cl

15.8

16.3

17.1

16.1

16.2

3.5 %

3.3 %

3.9 %

3.6 %

3.6 %

- 150cl

58.2

60.5

46.1

47.0

48.0

12.8 %

12.4 %

10.6 %

10.6 %

10.6 %

- 200cl

249.1

259.9

278.1

304.9

312.2

54.9 %

53.4 %

63.8 %

68.6 %

68.9 %

- 250cl

49.4

67.5

24.0

11.7

10.0

10.9 %

13.9 %

5.5 %

2.6 %

2.2 %

Total Refillable

33.9

31.3

26.8

25.2

26.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Glass

32.3

29.5

24.7

22.7

23.5

7.1 %

6.1 %

5.7 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

32.3

29.5

24.7

22.7

23.5

7.1 %

6.1 %

5.7 %

5.1 %

5.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 25cl

29.2

27.6

23.4

21.7

22.8

6.4 %

5.7 %

5.4 %

4.9 %

5.0 %

- 33cl

1.1

1.1

0.7

0.4

0.3

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 100cl

2.0

0.8

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Metal

1.7

1.8

2.1

2.5

3.0

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- Tank

1.7

1.8

2.1

2.5

3.0

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- 1800cl

1.7

1.8

2.1

2.5

3.0

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- Bottle
- 20cl

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

453.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

425.1

456.8

409.3

417.4

424.7

93.6 %

93.8 %

93.9 %

93.9 %

93.7 %

On-Premise

28.9

30.3

26.4

27.0

28.4

6.4 %

6.2 %

6.1 %

6.1 %

6.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Juice Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ...................................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Juice Trademarks 2008-2010 ............................................................................................................... 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Juice New Products 2010 ................................................................................................................................... 5
Juice New Products Photo Shots 2010 ............................................................................................................... 5
Juice Trademark Owners and Local Operators .................................................................................................. 6
Juice Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .................................................................................................. 6
Juice Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .................................................................................................. 7
Juice Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ........................................................................................... 7
Juice Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F .................................................................................... 7
Juice Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F .................................................................................... 8
Juice Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F .................................................................................................... 8
Juice Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ...................................................................................................... 8
Juice All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................................................... 9
Juice Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................................ 9
Juice Private Label Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 10
Juice Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................................ 10
Juice All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .......................................................................................................... 14
Juice All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................................... 15
Juice Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................. 16
Juice Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................................... 17
Juice Consumption by Pack Mix: Stability/Refillability, 2007-2011F................................................................. 17
Juice Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Stability, 2007-2011F................................................................. 18
Juice Consumption by Pack Mix: Stability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .................................................................. 18
Juice Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ............................................................. 19
Juice Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F .......................................................................................... 20

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

25.8

3.5

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

0.0 %

-5.1 %

-3.5 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

Value (at consumer price)

5,443.74

211.44

75.72

2.94

Segmentation 2010

Ambient

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

Off-Premise

On-Premise

% Share

85.3 %

14.7 %

Packaging 2010

Board

Glass

Metal

% Share

89.8 %

9.5 %

0.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


Economic pressure and high price levels drove down overall consumption by 4% in 2010.
The category targeted consumers by raising awareness of healthier alternatives. However consumers
responded by feeling that juice did not justify its premium price; high income consumers moved to
unpackaged squeezed juice rather than packaged juice. Middle classes switched to nectars or still drinks,
which were cheaper.
Larger pack sizes and smaller producers with a lower price per litre prevented a sharper drop.

Outlook
5% growth is expected in 2011 as consumer confidence strengthens. The NFC segment is expected to
compensate for any negative trends from the core segment.

Segmentation
Orange (35%) and apple (22%) were the dominant flavours. Apple growth was driven by the new NFC
launches from Next, Nectar and Fruvita. Third place was reserved for peach. All others flavours accounted for
less then 33%.
Unpackaged squeezed fresh juice was on offer in most urban modern retailers, but with negligible volumes.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Next

Coca-Cola

7.5

7.5

7.5

Nectar
Happy Day

Nectar

12.9

7.9

7.5

Rauch

1.2

1.5

1.6

Takovo

Swisslion

1.1

1.3

1.5

Fruvita

Fruvita

1.3

1.4

1.4

La Vita

Vino Zupa

1.2

1.1

1.3

DaGio

Duga Fruit

0.2

1.2

1.2

Verde

IB Team

0.3

0.7

0.8

Golf

Knjaz Milos

1.0

0.9

0.6

Minute Maid

Coca-Cola

0.3

0.4

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Leading brands Next and Nectar had a similar share of around 29% of the market. Happy Day (Rauch),
Fruvita, and Takovo (Swisslion) followed with less than 7% market share each.
The sharpest increase was seen by Takovo, with a 15% increase due to the better pricing and distribution

PDF Editor

structures. Verde (IB Team) and DaGio (Duga Fruit) also recorded slight growth.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


K Plus (Idea Private Label) entered the category with a price differentiation of over 10-15%. Private Label
lines increased by 29% in 2010, but from a small base. The overall market share of 2% is unlikely to change
soon.

Marketing
Four leading brands, Next, Rauch, Fruvita and Nectar all invested in above the line activities during 2010.
Their focus was a NFC segment in order to strengthen their brand image, but it did not bring expected
volumes in this subcategory.

Pricing/Valuation
Besides minor volumes, Fructals (imported brand) prices increased by far the most. On average, prices
increased by 8%. Again, under slow currency devaluation and as part of a sales strategy Nectar was the last
brand to increase prices in Q3-10, which had a positive volume effect. On the other hand, Rauch as the first
mover, suffered for almost three months with high prices and low sales.

Packaging
Carton (89%) was the dominant pack material in this category. 150cl carton grew by 6% while glass fell by
1%, as the most common EDA pack. Consumers were moving to the 150cl as there was more perceived
value from that size.

Distribution
Off-premise was the most dominant but declined by 2% where only the convenience channel showed an
increase of 8%.
On-premise recorded a drop of 12%, with the exception of EDA which increased by 2%. The fall in onpremise was mainly driven by the decline of the QSR channel. Serbian consumers were not attracted to
QSRs in 2010 and this looks set to continue.

PDF Editor

New Products 2010

Company
Coca-Cola

Brand
Next
Premium

Fruvita

Fruvita
Premium
K plus (PL)

IDEA
Nectar

Nectar Life
Unique

Flavour(s)
Apple, orange,
multivitamin,
peach, apricot,
pineapple,
strawberry
Cloudy Apple
NFC
Orange,
multivitamin
Orange

Pack
Type/Size

Price
RSD45.90
RSD137.90

Comment
Coca-Cola created a new
visual identity for its juice
range - Next Premium

100cl carton
200cl carton
100cl carton

RSD129.99
RSD219.99
RSD76.99

New flavour (see Figure 1)

100cl carton

RSD149.99

New Private Label brand for


IDEA retailer (see Figure 2)
Squeezed orange juice, NFC
(see see Figure 3)

Source : Canadean

Figure 1: Fruvita Premium Cloudy


Apply NFC Juice
Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Figure 2 : K Plus 100%

Figure 3 : Nectar Life Unique

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aro

Metro

IB Team

DaGio

Duga Fruit

Duga Fruit

Fruvita

Fruvita

Fruvita

Golf

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Happy Day

Rauch

Rauch

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Vino Zupa

Nectar

Nectar

Nectar

Next

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Takovo

Swisslion

Swisslion Takovo

Verde

IB Team

IB Team

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

20

FRUCTAL (SLOVENIA)

36.80

49.35

184.00

246.75

20

GOLF

36.80

39.90

184.00

199.50

20

LA VITA

32.46

33.99

162.30

169.95

20

NECTAR

39.95

43.33

46.58

199.75

216.65

232.90

20

NEXT

43.39

48.23

50.90

216.95

241.15

254.50

20

RAUCH

52.06

55.40

57.00

260.30

277.00

285.00

20

HAPPY DAY

35.68

38.60

39.90

178.40

193.00

199.50

20

NEXT (COCA-COLA/FRESH & CO)

28.90

39.99

42.00

144.50

199.95

210.00

28.90

115.60

137.08

147.60

114.20

120.89

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NR
GLASS

CARTON
(LONGLIFE)

25

FRUCTAL

100

FRUCTAL

100

HAPPY DAY (RAUCH)

100

LA VITA (VINOZUPA )

100

MOC PRIRODE NATURE

100

NECTAR

100

NEXT (COCA-COLA/FRESH & CO)

100

TAKOVO

100

VERDE

150

ARO ( METRO)

150

HAPPY DAY (RAUCH)

150

NECTAR

PDF Editor

52.79

263.95

34.27

36.90

114.20

120.89

108.90

124.99

136.90

108.90

124.99

136.90

60.90

88.50

95.90

60.90

88.50

95.90

121.90

124.99

130.90

121.90

124.99

130.90

115.90

129.99

131.90

115.90

129.99

131.90

95.00

99.99

104.41

95.00

99.99

104.41

72.90

72.90

95.08

114.90

95.08

114.90

106.20

109.58

70.80

73.05

145.73

143.75

154.00

97.15

95.83

102.67

154.90

126.35

133.90

103.27

84.23

89.27

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

HAPPY DAY (RAUCH)

216.90

108.45

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

20

HAPPY DAY

200.00

195.00

210.00

1,000.00

975.00

1,050.00

20

NECTAR LIFE

140.00

155.00

165.00

700.00

775.00

825.00

20

NEXT (COCA-COLA/FRESH & CO)

140.00

155.00

165.00

700.00

775.00

825.00

20

PAGO

170.00

185.00

195.00

850.00

925.00

975.00

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
200

219.99

230.00

110.00

115.00

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
GLASS

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

SOURCE : Canadean

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

9.9

16.6

21.2

23.6

33.2

34.9

46.1

50.6

53.7

39.9

36.8

38.8

Imports

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

Exports

3.3

10.4

9.5

18.3

20.6

22.8

13.3

11.1

11.7

21.4

23.8

25.9

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

Production

Consumption

9.9

16.6

21.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Austria

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

13.0 %

8.0 %

9.1 %

7.2 %

7.0 %

Others

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

87.0 %

92.0 %

90.9 %

92.8 %

93.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

20.6

22.8

13.3

11.1

11.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina

10.6

11.8

6.5

5.1

5.3

51.5 %

51.8 %

48.5 %

45.9 %

45.3 %

3.4

3.1

3.1

3.2

14.9 %

23.3 %

27.4 %

27.4 %

Montenegro
Macedonia

4.4

4.9

2.3

1.7

1.8

21.2 %

21.5 %

17.3 %

15.4 %

15.4 %

Kosovo

1.5

1.0

0.4

0.3

0.3

7.4 %

4.3 %

2.7 %

2.8 %

2.6 %

Others

4.1

1.7

1.1

1.0

1.1

19.9 %

7.5 %

8.3 %

8.5 %

9.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Not from


Concentrate

2.1

2.1

1.8

3.3

3.6

6.9 %

6.7 %

6.7 %

12.7 %

13.2 %

- Ambient

2.1

2.1

1.8

3.3

3.6

6.9 %

6.7 %

6.7 %

12.7 %

13.2 %

Total From Concentrate

28.2

29.1

25.0

22.6

23.6

93.1 %

93.3 %

93.3 %

87.3 %

86.8 %

- Ambient

28.2

29.1

25.0

22.6

23.6

93.1 %

93.3 %

93.3 %

87.3 %

86.8 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Orange

10.6

11.4

9.9

9.2

9.4

35.0 %

36.5 %

37.1 %

35.4 %

34.7 %

Apple

8.7

7.5

5.5

5.8

6.0

28.6 %

24.1 %

20.5 %

22.4 %

21.9 %

Peach

3.3

3.1

2.8

2.6

2.9

10.9 %

9.9 %

10.3 %

9.9 %

10.6 %

Flavour Mixes

2.0

2.7

2.4

2.4

2.7

6.6 %

8.6 %

9.1 %

9.4 %

9.9 %

Other Fruit

0.7

1.7

1.1

1.7

1.7

2.1 %

5.5 %

4.1 %

6.5 %

6.2 %

Pineapple

1.0

1.3

1.2

1.0

1.0

3.2 %

4.3 %

4.5 %

3.8 %

3.8 %

Tomato

1.4

1.2

1.0

1.0

1.1

4.7 %

4.0 %

3.7 %

3.8 %

4.2 %

Grapefruit

0.6

0.5

0.9

0.9

0.9

2.1 %

1.7 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.5 %

Berries

1.2

0.8

0.7

0.4

0.5

4.1 %

2.7 %

2.6 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

0.4

0.4

0.4

1.6 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

0.5

0.3

0.3

2.0 %

1.2 %

1.1 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Vegetable
Apricot

0.2

0.3

Pear
Cherry

0.6

0.6

PDF Editor

0.7 %

2.0 %

0.9 %

1.9 %

Million Litres
2007

2008

2009

% Share
2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Next

5.7

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

20.3 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

1.3

1.4

1.4

4.1 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

DaGio

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

Verde

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

Happy Day
Takovo

2.1

Fruvita
La Vita

Golf

2.5

1.3

Aro
Minute Maid
Moc Prirode

3.7

Ritam

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.1

1.0

0.0

0.0

7.6 %

9.0 %

4.6 %

13.4 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

1.6 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

7.1 %

3.0 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Hello

0.8

0.3

0.1

2.9 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

Meridijan

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Su Voce

0.2

0.0

0.8 %

0.0 %

Others

1.4

1.3

2.5

2.3

2.0

5.0 %

4.4 %

7.9 %

8.5 %

7.9 %

Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.2 %

0.3 %

1.2 %

1.6 %

2.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Juice

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Ambient

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next

5.7

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

20.3 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

- Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

- Others

1.4

1.3

2.5

2.3

2.0

5.0 %

4.4 %

7.9 %

8.5 %

7.9 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- La Vita

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

- Happy Day

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

- DaGio

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

1.3

1.4

1.4

4.1 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

- Fruvita
- Verde
- Golf

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

- Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.2 %

0.3 %

1.2 %

1.6 %

2.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Aro
- Minute Maid
- Moc Prirode

3.7

- Ritam

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.1

1.0

0.0

0.0

- Su Voce

0.2

0.0

- Bip

0.5

0.3

- Hello

0.8

- Meridijan

0.2

13.4 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

1.6 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

7.1 %

3.0 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

0.3

0.1

2.9 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Juice

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Ambient

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

93.3 %

96.6 %

0.0

0.0

6.7 %

3.4 %

- Aro
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Orange

9.2

10.6

11.4

9.9

9.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Premium

2.1

3.1

2.7

2.7

2.7

22.8 %

29.7 %

24.2 %

27.3 %

29.5 %

2.3

2.1

1.3

1.6

21.8 %

18.2 %

13.4 %

17.8 %

1.7

2.1

1.5

1.1

15.6 %

18.8 %

14.7 %

12.5 %

Total

- Nectar Life
- Nectar

2.6

PDF Editor

27.6 %

Million Litres
2006
- Happy Day

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

0.5

0.9

1.0

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

3.3 %

4.5 %

9.0 %

10.8 %

- Others

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.6

3.0 %

3.8 %

5.3 %

6.0 %

6.3 %

- Golf

1.1

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.4

11.4 %

6.3 %

5.5 %

6.0 %

4.7 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

2.5 %

2.5 %

3.6 %

4.1 %

0.2

0.2

0.3

1.9 %

2.5 %

3.5 %

0.1

0.2

0.2

1.1 %

2.1 %

1.9 %

- Fruvita Premium

0.8

0.4

0.3

6.6 %

4.4 %

2.9 %

- Takovo

0.1

0.2

0.2

1.0 %

2.1 %

1.7 %

0.2

0.2

2.2 %

2.2 %

0.1

0.1

0.9 %

1.1 %

- La Vita 5

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.7 %

- Aro

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Verde
- Other PL
- La Vita

0.6

0.2

- Nectar Fit
- Nectar Kids

0.4

6.1 %

1.4 %

3.9 %

- DaGio

0.4

0.1

0.0

0.0

3.3 %

0.9 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Minute Maid

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

2.7 %

3.0 %

4.2 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

0.8

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.8 %

1.1 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Takovo Gold

0.4

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.0

4.3 %

3.0 %

1.0 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Su Voce

0.1

0.0

1.1 %

0.0 %

- Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

4.9 %

2.5 %

0.9 %

- Hello

0.8

0.3

0.1

8.6 %

2.8 %

0.4 %

- Meridijan

0.1

0.0

0.0

1.5 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Total Apple

6.9

8.7

7.5

5.5

5.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Premium

1.2

1.6

1.5

1.5

1.5

17.3 %

18.8 %

20.5 %

27.6 %

26.4 %

2.5

2.0

1.2

1.2

29.0 %

26.7 %

21.7 %

21.1 %

1.4

1.8

0.9

0.9

16.2 %

24.0 %

16.5 %

15.2 %

0.5

0.3

0.7

6.3 %

5.4 %

12.6 %

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

3.0 %

4.7 %

5.8 %

5.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

2.5 %

2.2 %

4.7 %

5.0 %

1.0

0.2

0.3

0.2

11.3 %

2.5 %

4.9 %

2.9 %

- DaGio

0.1

0.2

0.2

1.3 %

4.0 %

3.5 %

- Verde

0.0

0.2

0.2

0.4 %

3.3 %

3.2 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

1.2 %

2.1 %

1.9 %

0.3

0.1

0.1

3.5 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

0.1

0.1

1.3 %

1.6 %

- Nectar Life
- Nectar

2.7

- Fruvita Premium
- Others

0.2

- Happy Day
- La Vita

- Takovo

1.5

0.2

- Nectar Kids
- La Vita 5
- Moc Prirode

1.0

- Ritam

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.5

0.5

0.0

0.0

- Su Voce

0.1

0.0

- Meridijan

0.1

0.0

PDF Editor

0.0

39.0 %

2.9 %

21.2 %

2.9 %

14.4 %

1.1 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

17.7 %

6.0 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Flavour Mixes

1.4

2.0

2.7

2.4

2.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Premium

0.6

1.3

1.4

1.3

1.3

46.4 %

64.4 %

52.2 %

52.9 %

54.6 %

- Nectar Life

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.4

28.1 %

18.7 %

16.7 %

16.5 %

- Happy Day

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

7.5 %

9.7 %

8.2 %

7.4 %

0.1

0.2

2.3 %

8.1 %

0.1

0.1

3.5 %

3.6 %

0.1

0.1

3.7 %

2.5 %

0.2

0.1

7.8 %

3.7 %

0.1

0.0

2.5 %

1.6 %

0.1

0.1

2.5 %

2.1 %

- La Vita
- Others

0.1

- Takovo

0.5

- Fruvita Premium
- Nectar Kids

0.4

- La Vita 5

3.7 %
35.8 %

15.7 %

- Nectar

0.3

Total Peach

2.6

3.3

3.1

2.8

2.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Premium

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.9

1.0

22.6 %

24.7 %

30.1 %

33.4 %

38.8 %

1.1

0.8

0.7

0.6

33.4 %

26.5 %

24.9 %

23.8 %

1.2

0.3

0.2

35.9 %

31.9 %

37.2 %

11.6 %

8.7 %

0.1

0.2

15.1 %

9.1 %

2.9 %

6.7 %

0.3

0.3

10.4 %

10.5 %

0.1

0.1

3.1 %

2.9 %

- Fruvita Premium

0.2

0.1

6.1 %

3.7 %

- La Vita 5

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

2.7 %

- Nectar Kids

0.1

0.0

2.2 %

1.6 %

0.1

0.0

2.9 %

3.3 %

0.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.9 %

9.2 %

40.7 %

- Nectar Life

17.9 %

- Nectar

1.0

1.1

- La Vita

0.4

0.3

- DaGio
- Others

0.1

0.1

- Takovo

0.2

0.1

- Moc Prirode

0.4

0.0

Total Other Fruit

1.6

0.7

- Takovo

0.4

- Others

0.4

- Other PL

0.1

3.8 %

3.2 %

7.6 %
15.1 %

0.9 %
100.0 %

1.7

1.1

1.7

100.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.7

27.2 %

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.5

25.5 %

76.9 %

38.2 %

54.1 %

30.0 %

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.2 %

15.4 %

8.8 %

15.5 %

14.4 %

0.9

0.2

0.3

50.0 %

21.2 %

15.0 %

- La Vita
- Moc Prirode

0.7

0.1

44.2 %

7.7 %

Total Pineapple

0.4

1.0

1.3

1.2

1.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Premium

0.4

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.5

100.0 %

58.2 %

33.2 %

32.8 %

48.7 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

15.7 %

11.3 %

10.5 %

10.6 %

- Golf

0.3

0.3

0.1

23.1 %

25.1 %

13.6 %

- Takovo

0.1

0.2

0.1

3.7 %

13.8 %

11.0 %

- Nectar Life

0.2

0.1

0.1

16.4 %

8.1 %

8.2 %

- Others

0.1

0.1

0.1

7.5 %

7.1 %

7.9 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

4.8 %

2.5 %

0.0 %

- Happy Day

- Takovo Gold

0.3

PDF Editor

26.1 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

Total Vegetable

0.4

- DaGio

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.4

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Grapefruit

0.3

0.6

0.5

0.9

0.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

29.4 %

23.1 %

48.1 %

24.7 %

21.3 %

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.2

7.8 %

5.8 %

19.1 %

22.5 %

0.0

0.3

0.2

9.1 %

36.1 %

25.1 %

0.1

0.2

14.3 %

26.4 %

0.1

0.0

5.8 %

4.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

16.7 %

85.1 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

83.3 %

14.9 %

0.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

31.5 %

38.6 %

34.8 %

32.2 %

4.1 %

8.0 %

17.5 %

23.8 %

- Verde
- Fruvita Premium
- Next Premium
- Happy Day
- Golf

0.2

Total Pear

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.1

- Nectar Life
- Takovo

0.0

Total Cherry

0.2

- Others

0.1

- Ritam

70.6 %
0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

23.4 %

17.8 %

45.8 %

19.3 %

100.0 %

100.0 %
0.6

0.6

0.6

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

66.7 %

0.5

0.0

0.0

- Takovo

0.1

33.3 %

Total Quince

0.0

100.0 %

- Takovo

0.0

100.0 %

Total Tomato

1.5

1.4

1.2

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

- Takovo

0.1

0.3

0.3

4.0 %

34.6 %

34.4 %

- Others

0.1

0.1

0.1

8.0 %

10.0 %

9.7 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

5.6 %

3.0 %

0.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

55.6 %

90.6 %

35.7 %

4.2 %

6.7 %

- Nectar Life
- Next Premium

0.1

- Moc Prirode

0.2

- Nectar

1.2

- La Vita

0.1

- Takovo Best
Total Apricot

1.8

0.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

3.8 %

10.1 %

13.3 %

80.4 %
0.0

5.7 %

0.7

0.4

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

- DaGio
- Nectar Life

100.0 %

2.1 %
49.0 %

35.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.6 %

5.3 %

3.8 %

1.6 %

2.3 %

- Next Premium

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

16.9 %

94.7 %

45.5 %

23.3 %

0.3 %

- Takovo

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

7.8 %

15.0 %

15.3 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

0.4

19.5 %

- Nectar

0.9

50.2 %

Total Berries

1.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

59.2 %

59.4 %

44.3 %

62.3 %

- Nectar Life

1.2

0.8

0.7

0.4

0.7

0.5

0.3

0.3

PDF Editor

100.0 %

Million Litres
2006

2008

2009

2010

2006

0.1

0.1

0.1

5.4 %

- La Vita 5

0.0

- Nectar Kids

- Others

2007

% Share

0.1

0.4

0.2

2008

2009

2010

11.9 %

12.0 %

17.4 %

0.1

6.6 %

12.3 %

0.1

0.0

7.8 %

6.5 %

0.2

0.0

29.3 %

1.6 %

- Next Premium

0.4

- Moc Prirode

0.3

17.8 %

- Takovo

0.1

7.5 %

- Nectar

0.9

0.1

20.8 %

48.5 %

2007

30.3 %

28.7 %

10.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

3.7

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

1.6 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

2.1

1.0

0.0

0.0

7.1 %

3.0 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Total

- Ritam
Bip Belgrade

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

- Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Coca-Cola

5.9

8.3

7.9

7.9

7.5

21.1 %

27.6 %

25.2 %

29.4 %

29.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

7.5

7.5

7.5

20.3 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

- Minute Maid
- Next

5.7

8.1

- Su Voce

0.2

0.0

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

- DaGio

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

0.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

1.3

1.4

1.4

4.1 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

Fruvita

0.8

- Fruvita
- Hello

0.8

0.3

0.1

IB Team

0.3

0.3

0.7

- Verde

0.3

0.3

2.9 %

2.9 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

Knjaz Milos

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

- Golf

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Meridijan

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Metro

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Aro

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

- Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

Others

1.4

1.4

2.8

2.7

2.6

5.1 %

4.7 %

9.1 %

10.0 %

10.1 %

- Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.2 %

0.3 %

1.2 %

1.6 %

2.2 %

- Others

1.4

1.3

2.5

2.3

2.0

5.0 %

4.4 %

7.9 %

8.5 %

7.9 %

Rauch

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

- Happy Day

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Swisslion

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

- La Vita

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

3.7

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

1.6 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.0 %

Total

2.1

1.0

7.1 %

3.0 %

Bip Belgrade

- Ritam
0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

- Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

- DaGio

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

Fresh & Co

5.9

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

21.1 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

- Next

5.7

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

20.3 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

- Su Voce

0.2

0.0

0.8 %

0.0 %

Fruvita

0.8

0.3

2.9 %

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

4.1 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

3.2 %

3.6 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

- Fruvita
- Hello
IB Team

0.8

1.3

1.4

1.4

1.3

1.4

1.4

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.9

0.9

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

- Aro
- Other Private Label

2.9 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

1.0 %

1.4 %

- Verde

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

IBP

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

- Minute Maid

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Knjaz Milos

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

- Golf

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Meridijan

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

- Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

Others

1.4

1.4

2.7

2.6

2.4

5.1 %

4.7 %

8.7 %

9.6 %

9.5 %

- Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

1.5 %

- Others

1.4

5.0 %

1.3

2.5

2.3

2.0

4.4 %

7.9 %

8.5 %

7.9 %

Rauch

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

- Happy Day

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Swisslion Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

- La Vita

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

5.9

8.3

7.9

7.9

7.5

21.1 %

27.6 %

25.2 %

29.4 %

29.0 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Total

Rauch
Swisslion

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Fruvita

0.8

0.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

2.9 %

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

IB Team

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.0 %

10.0 %

10.1 %

Knjaz Milos

1.3

Metro
Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

Bip Belgrade

0.5

Others

1.4

4.6 %

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

1.4

2.8

5.1 %

4.7 %

9.1 %

2.7

PDF Editor

2.6

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fresh & Co

5.9

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

21.1 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Total

Rauch
Swisslion Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Fruvita

0.8

0.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

2.9 %

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

IB Team

0.3

0.4

0.9

0.9

1.0 %

1.4 %

3.2 %

3.6 %

Knjaz Milos

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

9.6 %

9.5 %

IBP
Bip Belgrade

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Others

1.4

1.4

2.7

5.1 %

4.7 %

8.7 %

2.6

2.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Long Life

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Non-Refillable

30.0

30.8

26.8

25.8

27.2

99.1 %

99.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Refillable

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Non-Refillable

30.0

30.8

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Long Life

30.0

30.8

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Refillable

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Long Life

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Juice

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Long Life

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

27.8

28.6

24.1

23.1

24.5

91.9 %

91.8 %

90.1 %

89.8 %

89.8 %

27.8

28.6

23.7

22.8

24.2

91.9 %

91.8 %

88.5 %

88.6 %

88.8 %

- 20cl

2.7

2.7

1.4

1.4

1.5

8.8 %

8.7 %

5.1 %

5.5 %

5.5 %

- 25cl

1.0

1.2

0.6

0.6

0.6

3.5 %

3.7 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Carton

- 33cl
- 100cl

21.3

21.7

18.4

17.3

18.3

70.2 %

69.7 %

68.6 %

67.2 %

67.1 %

- 150cl

2.6

2.8

3.0

3.1

3.4

8.7 %

9.0 %

11.0 %

12.1 %

12.3 %

- 200cl

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.6 %

0.6 %

1.0 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

- Bag in Box

0.4

0.3

0.3

1.6 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

- 100cl

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

- 650cl

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

- Glass
- Bottle

2.2

2.1

2.5

2.4

2.6

7.2 %

6.9 %

9.2 %

9.5 %

9.6 %

2.2

2.1

2.5

2.4

2.6

7.2 %

6.9 %

9.2 %

9.5 %

9.6 %

1.4

1.4

1.4

5.2 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

- 12.5cl
- 20cl

2.0

2.0

1.0

1.0

1.2

6.6 %

6.5 %

3.8 %

4.1 %

4.3 %

- 70cl

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Metal

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.9 %

1.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

- Tank

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

- 1800cl

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Can

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

- 33cl

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2007

2008

2009

% Share
2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Juice

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

30.0

30.8

26.8

25.8

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

27.8

28.6

24.1

23.1

24.5

91.9 %

91.8 %

90.1 %

89.8 %

89.8 %

27.8

28.6

23.7

22.8

24.2

91.9 %

91.8 %

88.5 %

88.6 %

88.8 %

- 20cl

2.7

2.7

1.4

1.4

1.5

8.8 %

8.7 %

5.1 %

5.5 %

5.5 %

- 25cl

1.0

1.2

0.6

0.6

0.6

3.5 %

3.7 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

2.2 %

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Carton

- 33cl
- 100cl

21.3

21.7

18.4

17.3

18.3

70.2 %

69.7 %

68.6 %

67.2 %

67.1 %

- 150cl

2.6

2.8

3.0

3.1

3.4

8.7 %

9.0 %

11.0 %

12.1 %

12.3 %

- 200cl

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.6 %

0.6 %

1.0 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

- Bag in Box

0.4

0.3

0.3

1.6 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

- 100cl

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

- 650cl

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

- Glass
- Bottle

2.2

2.1

2.5

2.4

2.6

7.2 %

6.9 %

9.2 %

9.5 %

9.6 %

2.2

2.1

2.5

2.4

2.6

7.2 %

6.9 %

9.2 %

9.5 %

9.6 %

1.4

1.4

1.4

5.2 %

5.2 %

5.1 %

- 12.5cl
- 20cl

2.0

2.0

1.0

1.0

1.2

6.6 %

6.5 %

3.8 %

4.1 %

4.3 %

- 70cl

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Metal

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

- Can

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

- 33cl

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Refillable

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Metal

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

- Tank

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

- 1800cl

0.3

0.3

0.9 %

1.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

30.3

31.2

26.8

25.7

27.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

24.5

25.1

22.5

22.0

23.8

81.1 %

80.7 %

83.9 %

85.3 %

87.4 %

On-Premise

5.7

6.0

4.3

3.8

3.4

18.9 %

19.3 %

16.1 %

14.7 %

12.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Nectars Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 .................................................................. 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 4
Leading Nectars Trademarks 2008-2010 ........................................................................................................... 4
Functional Products ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 5
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Nectars New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................... 5
Nectars New Products Photo Shots 2010 ........................................................................................................... 5
Nectars Trademark Owners and Local Operators .............................................................................................. 6
Nectars Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .............................................................................................. 6
Nectars Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .............................................................................................. 7
Nectars Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ....................................................................................... 8
Nectars Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ................................................................................ 8
Nectars Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ................................................................................ 8
Nectars Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F ................................................................................................ 8
Nectars Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F .................................................................................................. 9
Nectars All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................................... 9
Nectars Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 .......................................................................................................... 10
Nectars Private Label Brands by Segment, 2007-2010 .................................................................................... 11
Nectars Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................................ 11
Nectars Functional Brands, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................................ 17
Nectars All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................................... 17
Nectars All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................................... 18
Nectars Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................. 20
Nectars Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 .................................................................................................. 20
Nectars Consumption by Pack Mix: Stability/Refillability, 2007-2011F............................................................. 21
Nectars Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Stability, 2007-2011F............................................................. 21
Nectars Consumption by Pack Mix: Stability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .............................................................. 21
Nectars Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ......................................................... 22
Nectars Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ...................................................................................... 23

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

137.5

18.8

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

0.2 %

-3.0 %

-13.8 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

24,793.30

180.18

344.84

2.51

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010

Ambient

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

Off-Premise

On-Premise

% Share

83.6 %

16.4 %

Packaging 2010

Board

PET

Glass

Other

% Share

86.6 %

10.1 %

3.3 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


Slow recovery from the high levels of unemployment and a pessimistic attitude towards the economy in
general led to a drop in the sale of nectars of 14%.
Significant price discounts and large pack promotions were not able to compensate for a switch in
consumption to cheaper alternatives (still drinks and syrups). In order to fulfill the price requirement,
consumers also choose Private Label lines for more reasonable prices.
La Vita (Vino Zupa), the market leader, suffered the highest drop of 21%. The reason behind this was a
published report about the quality of some JNSD brands. A laboratory examined seven brands, Vino Zupa
was the lowest quality and that was communicated to the media after the testing. Vino Zupa have now
improved their quality but it was still facing difficulties from negative PR.
Vino Zupa also shifted its focus towards the development of an alcoholic range and repositioning its
distribution to the regional export markets. Although it had an improved beverage quality, recovery is
expected to be slow.

Outlook
The reason behind the expected 4% growth lies in the expected success of the new Next Classic (Coca-Cola)
in 200cl carton, launched in December 2010.
Adequate above the line and strong TCCC distribution power will mean the volume is more positive in 2011.
The expected increase in consumer confidence should create additional demand, too.

Segmentation
Peach and apple each had approximately 25% of the market share, both seeing declines in 2010, while
orange held a 9% share. Other fruit flavours and quince were the only flavours to make gains, as consumers
moved away from traditional flavours.
It is expected that optimisation of the flavour portfolio from the producers will bring less SKUs on the shelf.

PDF Editor

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

La Vita

Vino Zupa

45.2

48.7

37.5

Nectar

Nectar

42.4

31.7

29.7

Vocna Dolina

Fruvita

9.3

13.7

12.8

Vocne Kapi

Nectar

11.9

10.8

10.3

Frutta di Primavera

Fruvita

8.7

9.1

Next

Coca-Cola

7.6

8.1

8.4

Verde

IB Team

7.4

8.7

6.2

Hello

Fruvita

3.9

6.4

3.4

Takovo

Swisslion

8.3

3.8

2.7

DaGio

Duga Fruit

3.0

2.4

2.5

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Despite the 23% drop, La Vita (Vino Zupa) was still the leading brand. Smaller brands, such as Takovo and
Verde both fell by 28%.

Functional Products
After a few years of growth since conception, functional nectars declined in 2010. TCCC trademark brands,
Next Buci Buci (with honey) and Next Body Time fell by 18% and 33% respectfully. Nectar functional brand
Nectar Plus also recorded a double digit drop of 12%.
This segment was perceived to be fashionable and helped to build up the company image and support
company awareness. One of the most important benefits for producers was the opportunity for creative and
innovative marketing strategies. Despite very high margins, the market remained niche.
Perceived as innovative and a prestige product by the producers, some smaller players planned to enter and
exploit the benefits of functional nectars. These plans have been temporarily postponed due to the slowed
consumption.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Private Label sales increased by 8% due to the much lower pricing. Private Label lines benefited from the
increased share of shelf space and improved Private Label flavour assortment.

Marketing
As a result of budget cuts, only TCCC and Nectar, invested more in marketing.

Pricing/Valuation
The presence of the economic crisis determined pricing as the leading argument in off-premise nectar
consumption.

PDF Editor

Packaging
Carton had an 87% share of the market and was decreasing, together with all other packs. Dramatic gains
were made by 200cl carton over several years, but this format performed poorly again in 2010. Next Classic
decided to adopt new packaging (200cl carton) at the end of 2010 in order to improve its presence in this
category.

Distribution
The off-premise was particularly hard hit by the decline of the overall category. Traditional retailers lost almost
25% of volume; however, with the exception of other on-premise, all segments saw a decline. These declines
reflect the unpopularity of the category.

New Products 2010

Company
Coca-Cola

Brand
Next
Classic

Fruvita

Vocna
Dolina

Flavour(s)
Apple, peach,
orange, apricot,
multivitamin,
pineapple,
strawberry
Quince

Source : Canadean

Figure 1: Fruvita Vocna Dolina


Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Pack
Type/Size
33cl carton
100cl carton
200cl carton

Price
RSD49.90
RSD95.90
RSD174.03

150 cl PET

RSD135.99

Comment
Coca-Cola has created a
new visual identity for its
nectars product range and
also extended it to include
larger sized cartons
New flavour from Vocna
Dolina brand (Figure 1)

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aro

Metro

IB Team

Bravo (Rauch)

Rauch

Rauch

DaGio

Duga Fruit

Duga Fruit

Frutta di Primavera

Fruvita

Fruvita

Golf

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Hello

Fruvita

Fruvita

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Vino Zupa

Moc Prirode

Agroekonomik

Agroekonomik

Nectar

Nectar

Nectar

Next

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Su Voce

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Takovo

Swisslion

Swisslion Takovo

Verde

IB Team

IB Team

Vocna Dolina

Fruvita

Fruvita

Vocne Kapi

Nectar

Nectar

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

20

BRAVO (RAUCH)

53.30

266.50

20

DAGIO (DUGA KOMERC)

20

FRUCTAL

20

GOLF

37.20

20

NECTAR

20

NEXT

CAN

33

CARTON

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NR
GLASS

54.80

58.00

274.00

290.00

31.75

33.58

158.75

167.90

53.01

55.39

39.51

43.90

186.00

265.05

276.95

197.55

219.50

42.60

49.70

52.90

53.20

48.23

50.99

213.00

248.50

264.50

266.00

241.15

254.95

BRAVO

53.86

55.40

58.60

163.21

167.88

177.58

20

BRAVO

24.21

28.30

29.99

121.05

141.50

149.95

20
20

DAGIO (DUGA KOMERC)

22.99

24.60

114.95

123.00

K PLUS (IDEA)

18.99

20.49

94.95

102.45

20

LA VITA

20

MOC PRIRODE/VIVITA

25.00

27.00

125.00

135.00

20

NECTAR

26.75

20

NEXT

29.99

28.58

133.75

142.90

31.70

149.95

158.50

PDF Editor

21.90

109.50

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
33

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

NEXT

42.90

130.00

44.99

47.58

60.77

64.79

79.99

86.90

79.99

84.90

180.80

79.90

84.99

92.90

96.99

99.90

K PLUS (IDEA)

49.99

LA VITA

76.50
71.85

77.90

82.99

88.58

74.90

89.99

95.19

91.90

53.90

62.90

64.80

71.99

75.90

61.20

74.99

79.90

100

ARO ( METRO)

100

BRAVO

100

DAGIO (DUGA KOMERC)

100

FRUCTAL

100

FRUVITA

100
100
100

MOC PRIRODE

100

NECTAR

74.90

100

NEXT

91.90

100

PREMIA (MAXI)

100

TAKOVO

100

VERDE

150

ARO ( METRO)

150

NECTAR

150

SU VOCE

200

BRAVO

200
200

73.16

136.33

144.18

60.77

64.79

79.99

86.90

79.99

84.90

180.80

79.90

84.99

92.90

96.99

99.90

53.99

49.99

53.99

82.69

76.50

82.69

71.85

77.90

82.99

88.58

89.99

95.19

53.90

62.90

64.80

71.99

75.90

61.20

74.99

79.90

73.16

94.40

99.59

62.93

66.39

94.99

106.99

66.60

63.33

71.33

146.20

159.03

167.90

73.10

79.52

83.95

FRUVITA

102.66

129.99

134.99

51.33

65.00

67.50

LA VITA

98.90

99.99

107.58

49.45

50.00

53.79

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

20

BRAVO

170.00

165.00

850.00

825.00

20

FRUCTAL

155.00

155.00

775.00

775.00

20

GOLF

145.00

140.00

150.00

725.00

700.00

750.00

20

NECTAR

170.00

153.00

165.00

850.00

765.00

825.00

99.90
77.33

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NR
GLASS

SOURCE : Canadean

PDF Editor

175.00

875.00

Production
Imports

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

39.7

59.1

79.4

100.1

135.2

151.3

169.2

202.7

239.3

207.6

180.6

186.5

1.3

1.6

2.0

2.2

3.5

3.9

3.3

2.5

2.0

1.3

1.0

1.1

0.8

16.5

18.8

29.1

54.4

69.8

49.5

44.1

45.2

101.5

122.2

136.3

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

Exports
Consumption

41.0

60.7

81.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

2.5

2.0

1.3

1.0

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Austria

1.2

0.9

0.4

0.2

0.2

48.0 %

45.0 %

30.8 %

22.0 %

22.9 %

Others

1.3

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.8

52.0 %

55.0 %

69.2 %

78.0 %

77.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

54.4

69.8

49.5

44.1

45.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina

32.8

35.8

26.8

23.5

24.0

60.2 %

51.3 %

54.2 %

53.4 %

53.2 %

13.1

9.1

8.9

9.2

18.8 %

18.3 %

20.2 %

20.4 %

11.2

11.8

9.7

8.3

8.4

20.6 %

16.9 %

19.6 %

18.9 %

18.6 %

Kosovo

7.5

6.0

2.3

1.9

2.0

13.9 %

8.6 %

4.7 %

4.2 %

4.3 %

Others

2.9

3.1

1.6

1.5

1.6

5.3 %

4.4 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.5 %

Montenegro
Macedonia

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total From Concentrate

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Ambient

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Peach

31.0

34.1

37.9

33.9

33.6

20.5 %

19.9 %

23.7 %

24.7 %

23.6 %

Apple

43.2

48.4

39.4

33.5

34.4

28.7 %

28.2 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

24.1 %

Flavour Mixes

14.5

18.1

20.9

17.3

18.5

9.6 %

10.6 %

13.1 %

12.5 %

13.0 %

Berries

16.8

21.9

16.9

13.5

14.9

11.1 %

12.8 %

10.6 %

9.8 %

10.5 %

Orange

10.3

11.7

14.4

12.2

12.4

6.8 %

6.8 %

9.0 %

8.9 %

8.7 %

Other Fruit

20.7

19.1

10.7

11.1

11.6

13.7 %

11.1 %

6.7 %

8.0 %

8.2 %

Apricot

7.6

6.7

6.2

5.4

5.6

5.0 %

3.9 %

3.9 %

3.9 %

3.9 %

Cherry

5.5

6.4

4.9

3.9

4.4

3.6 %

3.8 %

3.1 %

2.9 %

3.1 %

Pear

0.4

3.1

3.5

2.8

2.9

0.3 %

1.8 %

2.2 %

2.0 %

2.0 %

Pineapple

0.6

0.7

2.1

1.6

1.8

0.4 %

0.4 %

1.3 %

1.1 %

1.3 %

0.9

1.8

1.4

1.1

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.0

0.5

0.6

0.0 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Grapefruit

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Banana

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Vegetable
Quince

0.3

0.2 %

Citrus

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Mango

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

La Vita

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

42.4

31.7

29.7

27.9 %

28.8 %

24.7 %

19.9 %

21.6 %

1.5

7.5

9.3

13.7

12.8

1.0 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

11.9

10.8

10.3

6.9 %

6.8 %

7.5 %

8.7

9.1

5.5 %

6.6 %

Vocna Dolina
Vocne Kapi
Frutta di Primavera
Next

5.2

6.9

7.6

8.1

8.4

3.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

5.1 %

6.1 %

Verde

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

Hello

7.2

4.6

3.9

6.4

3.4

5.0 %

3.1 %

2.3 %

4.0 %

2.5 %

Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

DaGio

2.3

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

1.6 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

1.0

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.7 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

Bravo (Rauch)
Golf

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Moc Prirode

19.9

3.9

4.2

0.9

2.0

13.9 %

2.6 %

2.4 %

0.6 %

1.5 %

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

Aro

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Su Voce

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

19.1

2.4

2.3

1.8

1.3

13.3 %

1.6 %

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

12.5

7.7

2.1

0.0

8.3 %

4.5 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

0.7

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Ritam
Froovy
Meridijan

% Share

1.2

Happy Day

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.3

Nature

0.7

Duga

3.8

Others

1.5

Other Private Label

0.5

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.2 %
0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

2.5 %

2.1 %

2.6 %

3.2 %

2.6 %
1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

3.7

3.6

4.2

4.4

1.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Nectars

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Ambient

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- La Vita

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

- Nectar

40.1

43.5

42.4

31.7

29.7

27.9 %

28.8 %

24.7 %

19.9 %

21.6 %

- Vocna Dolina

1.5

7.5

9.3

13.7

12.8

1.0 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

- Next

5.2

6.9

7.6

8.1

8.4

3.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

5.1 %

6.1 %

- Verde

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

11.9

10.8

10.3

6.9 %

6.8 %

7.5 %

8.7

9.1

5.5 %

6.6 %

- Vocne Kapi
- Frutta di Primavera
- Other Private Label

3.7

3.6

4.2

4.4

2.5 %

2.1 %

2.6 %

3.2 %

7.2

4.6

3.9

6.4

3.4

5.0 %

3.1 %

2.3 %

4.0 %

2.5 %

- Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

- DaGio

2.3

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

1.6 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

- Golf

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- Moc Prirode

19.9

3.9

4.2

0.9

2.0

13.9 %

2.6 %

2.4 %

0.6 %

1.5 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

1.0

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.7 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

- Aro

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

19.1

2.4

2.3

1.8

1.3

13.3 %

1.6 %

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

12.5

7.7

2.1

0.0

8.3 %

4.5 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

0.7

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Hello

- Su Voce
- Others
- Ritam
- Froovy
- Happy Day

0.3

PDF Editor

0.2 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

- Duga

3.8

- Meridijan

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Nature

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

2009

2010

2.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Nectars

4.6

4.4

5.9

6.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Ambient

4.6

4.4

5.9

6.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Other Private Label

3.7

3.6

4.2

4.4

81.3 %

81.1 %

71.1 %

69.4 %

- Aro

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

18.7 %

18.9 %

28.9 %

30.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

39.4

43.2

48.4

39.4

33.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- La Vita

5.2

8.4

9.5

9.3

7.5

13.3 %

19.4 %

19.6 %

23.6 %

22.3 %

- Nectar

7.6

9.4

9.5

6.9

6.8

19.4 %

21.6 %

19.6 %

17.4 %

20.4 %

- Vocna Dolina

0.8

4.3

4.6

4.5

4.1

2.0 %

9.8 %

9.5 %

11.4 %

12.2 %

- Verde

0.5

1.7

4.7

4.6

2.0

1.3 %

3.8 %

9.7 %

11.6 %

6.0 %

3.6

3.3

3.2

7.4 %

8.3 %

9.5 %

1.5

1.4

1.4

1.5

3.5 %

3.0 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

1.9

1.1

1.3

1.4

4.4 %

2.3 %

3.3 %

4.0 %

2.3

2.2

5.7 %

6.7 %

2.3

0.8

0.8

4.8 %

2.1 %

2.5 %

1.1

1.0

0.9

2.3 %

2.4 %

2.7 %

Total
Total Apple

- Vocne Kapi
- Next Classic

1.3

- Other PL
- Frutta di Primavera
- DaGio

2.3

2.7

- Nectar Family

3.2 %

5.8 %

6.3 %

- Golf

5.2

4.3

3.7

0.6

0.5

13.2 %

9.8 %

7.6 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

- Moc Prirode

4.1

0.8

0.8

0.2

0.5

10.3 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

0.5 %

1.4 %

0.7

1.0

0.8

1.3 %

2.5 %

2.3 %

2.5

0.2

0.6

0.5

5.8 %

0.4 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.2

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.3 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

- Aro

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

1.2 %

- Hello Fruit Party


- Takovo

2.4

PDF Editor

6.0 %

Million Litres

- Hello

2006

2007

1.7

0.9

- Ritam

4.4

- Takovo Best

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

0.3

0.0

4.2 %

2.0 %

2.5

0.7

0.0

1.4

0.1

0.0

10.1 %

2008

2009

2010

0.8 %

0.0 %

5.1 %

1.7 %

0.0 %

2.8 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

- Su Voce

7.8

- Meridijan

0.5

0.0

0.0

1.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Nature

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.8 %

21.9

31.0

34.1

37.9

33.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- La Vita

3.7

5.9

4.7

8.1

6.7

16.9 %

19.2 %

13.8 %

21.3 %

19.7 %

- Nectar

6.9

11.3

7.3

5.3

4.8

31.2 %

36.3 %

21.4 %

13.9 %

14.2 %

- Vocna Dolina

0.4

2.7

3.2

4.5

4.2

1.8 %

8.6 %

9.4 %

11.8 %

12.5 %

6.2

5.6

5.4

18.2 %

14.9 %

15.8 %

Total Peach

19.8 %

- Vocne Kapi
- Next Classic

0.9

1.2

1.3

1.3

1.5

4.2 %

3.8 %

3.9 %

3.5 %

4.5 %

- Verde

0.5

1.0

0.7

1.3

1.3

2.1 %

3.2 %

2.1 %

3.4 %

3.9 %

- Su Voce

1.4

0.7

2.3

1.7

1.2

6.2 %

2.4 %

6.7 %

4.6 %

3.6 %

3.2

2.7

8.3 %

7.9 %

- Frutta di Primavera
- Nectar Family

1.8

1.6

1.6

5.3 %

4.3 %

4.6 %

- Other PL

1.1

1.3

1.4

3.3 %

3.4 %

4.0 %

- Aro

0.3

0.1

0.8

0.9

1.0 %

0.2 %

2.1 %

2.8 %

- DaGio

0.5

0.1

0.6

0.6

1.6 %

0.3 %

1.5 %

1.7 %

- Moc Prirode

1.6

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.4

7.2 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

0.4 %

1.3 %

- Takovo

3.2

3.2

0.4

0.6

0.4

14.4 %

10.3 %

1.3 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

- Golf

0.9

0.7

0.6

0.5

4.1 %

2.3 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

0.3

0.2

0.8 %

0.6 %

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3

0.0

0.9 %

0.0 %

1.6

0.4

0.0

4.6 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

2.2

0.1

0.0

6.3 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

- Hello Fruit Party

0.6

- Next Buci-Buci
- Hello

0.9

- Ritam

0.8
1.8

- Takovo Best
- Meridijan

0.3

- Happy Day

4.0 %

5.8 %

0.2

0.5 %

1.2

- Nature

0.3

0.2

Total Flavour Mixes

1.8

14.5

18.1

20.9

17.3

10.5

11.9

14.0

11.2

1.0

1.4

1.4

1.4

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.5

- La Vita
- Next Classic

0.5

5.5 %

- Other PL
- Bravo (Rauch)

2.6 %

1.4 %

- Duga

- Nectar Family

1.8 %

0.3

PDF Editor

1.2 %

0.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

72.0 %

65.3 %

67.0 %

65.0 %

7.2 %

7.7 %

6.6 %

8.2 %

3.9 %

4.0 %

5.2 %

4.7 %

3.4 %

3.9 %

3.3 %

2.6 %

3.1 %

29.9 %

2.1 %

Million Litres
2006

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.7

0.6

0.4

0.3

4.8 %

3.4 %

1.9 %

1.9 %

- Takovo

0.8

0.6

3.9 %

3.4 %

- Verde

0.6

0.6

2.7 %

3.2 %

- Hello Fruit Party

0.8

0.5

3.9 %

2.9 %

- Next Bodytime

0.2

0.4

1.0 %

2.5 %

- Su Voce

0.1

0.1

0.5 %

0.5 %

- Nectar Plus

- Hello

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.3

0.0

- Vocna Dolina

0.3

0.1

0.0

- Ritam

0.9

0.6

- Takovo Best
- Froovy

4.8 %

3.6 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

0.0

1.9 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.0

6.2 %

3.5 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

0.5

0.0

0.0

2.8 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.0

0.0

1.2 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

0.5

- Nature

0.2

0.1

0.0

25.2

16.8

21.9

16.9

- Nectar

8.4

6.1

5.8

- La Vita

2.6

1.8

Total Berries

1.1

30.6 %

26.7 %

- La Vita Happy
- Golf

2006

1.3

- Nectar Family

12.8 %

0.9 %

0.2 %

13.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

4.2

3.9

33.3 %

36.2 %

26.3 %

24.6 %

28.9 %

1.8

2.9

2.2

10.2 %

10.7 %

8.2 %

16.8 %

16.5 %

7.1

5.0

2.8

32.4 %

29.6 %

20.8 %

0.7

1.0

1.0

3.2 %

6.1 %

7.3 %

1.6

1.5

1.4

7.5 %

8.7 %

10.7 %

4.2 %

7.5 %

- Next Classic

0.7

0.6

0.9

0.7

0.8

2.7 %

3.8 %

4.1 %

4.4 %

5.6 %

- Takovo

1.4

1.0

0.2

0.6

0.5

5.4 %

5.7 %

0.9 %

3.7 %

4.0 %

- Moc Prirode

4.6

1.2

1.2

0.2

0.2

18.3 %

6.9 %

5.6 %

1.0 %

1.6 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

0.7 %

1.4 %

1.8 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.2 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

1.0 %

0.2

0.2

1.0 %

1.6 %

- DaGio
- Others

0.2

- Hello Fruit Party


- Nectar Plus
- Hello

0.7

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.7

0.8

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4

0.1

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.0

- Vocna Dolina
- Ritam

0.9

- Takovo Best
- Happy Day

2.7 %

3.0 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

4.0 %

3.5 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

1.9 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

2.5 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

5.4 %

0.2

0.9 %

- Duga

0.4

- Su Voce

5.0

1.7

- Meridijan

0.2

0.6

0.4

21.8

10.3

11.7

14.4

- La Vita

1.4

3.5

3.6

- Next Classic

0.8

1.2

1.3

Total Orange

0.9 %

1.6 %

PDF Editor

19.7 %

9.9 %

1.0 %

3.7 %

1.6 %

12.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

4.2

3.6

6.2 %

34.0 %

30.9 %

29.4 %

29.4 %

1.2

1.5

3.6 %

11.8 %

10.8 %

8.7 %

12.2 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

- Frutta di Primavera
- Nectar

4.8

% Share
2009

2010

1.8

1.6

1.6

1.0

0.7

0.6

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.4

0.7

0.8

- Other PL

0.6

0.4

2006

2008

2009

2010

12.5 %

13.1 %

15.7 %

8.5 %

5.0 %

5.1 %

0.8

3.4 %

6.0 %

5.4 %

6.3 %

0.5

0.6

5.8 %

3.8 %

3.7 %

4.6 %

0.6

0.7

0.7

4.9 %

4.7 %

5.6 %

0.1

0.5

0.5

1.1 %

3.3 %

4.0 %

- Hello Fruit Party

0.6

0.9

0.7

4.8 %

6.6 %

5.3 %

- Nectar Family

0.6

0.5

0.5

5.1 %

3.8 %

4.4 %

0.1

0.4

0.3

7.1 %

0.9 %

2.5 %

2.5 %

0.2

0.1

0.3

24.9 %

1.7 %

0.9 %

2.4 %

0.5

0.3

0.2

0.2

2.8 %

4.9 %

2.6 %

1.5 %

1.7 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

2.0 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

2.0 %

0.0

0.7

0.2

0.2 %

4.9 %

1.4 %

0.3

0.0

1.7 %

0.0 %

0.4

0.3

0.0

3.4 %

1.8 %

0.0 %

0.8

0.2

0.0

6.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Takovo Best

0.5

0.0

0.0

3.8 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Froovy

0.4

0.1

0.0

3.4 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Verde
- DaGio

0.2

- Takovo

1.6

- Moc Prirode

5.4

- Others

0.6

- Aro

0.8

- Next Bodytime
- Hello

1.4

0.6

- Vocna Dolina
- Ritam

0.7

22.0 %

2007

1.9 %

6.2 %

0.1

0.3 %

- Su Voce

3.9

18.1 %

- Duga

1.9

8.7 %

- Nectar Plus

13.7

20.7

19.1

10.7

11.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

3.5

3.6

3.2

2.1

1.9

25.5 %

17.5 %

16.9 %

20.0 %

17.4 %

2.1

1.9

1.8

10.8 %

17.5 %

16.3 %

1.5

2.6

14.2 %

23.8 %

- Vocne Kapi
- Frutta di Primavera
- Verde

1.9

- Nectar
- Next Classic

0.3

- Aro
- La Vita

5.8 %

6.8 %

- Meridijan

Total Other Fruit

7.8 %

1.0

- Other PL

2.2

1.5

0.9

1.0

2.7

1.8

1.3

1.1

0.6

0.7

0.4

0.6

0.0

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

1.1

0.3

0.3

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

13.8 %

2.0 %

7.3 %

10.7 %

7.6 %

8.5 %

8.8 %

13.2 %

9.4 %

12.1 %

10.4 %

2.7 %

3.6 %

3.6 %

5.6 %

0.1 %

1.5 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

2.0 %

5.5 %

2.7 %

2.6 %

6.0 %

1.0 %

2.2 %

2.3 %

- Moc Prirode

1.5

1.3

1.3

0.1

0.2

10.9 %

6.0 %

7.0 %

1.0 %

1.7 %

- Golf

1.6

2.9

3.4

0.2

0.2

11.6 %

13.8 %

17.8 %

2.3 %

1.5 %

0.4

0.4

3.9 %

3.6 %

- Hello Fruit Party


- Others

0.6

- Bravo (Rauch)
- DaGio

0.5

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.2

1.0

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

PDF Editor

4.4 %

2.5 %

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.0 %

5.1 %

2.3 %

1.3 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Hello

1.1

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.0

8.0 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

0.0 %

- Takovo

2.2

1.5

0.3

0.0

0.0

16.0 %

7.2 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

3.1

1.3

0.4

0.0

15.1 %

7.0 %

3.5 %

0.0 %

0.3

0.0

0.0

1.6 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

- Ritam
- Takovo Best
- Meridijan

0.1

0.0

0.0

10.1

7.6

6.7

6.2

- Nectar

3.8

4.0

3.3

- Vocna Dolina

0.3

0.3

- Takovo

1.8

- Next Classic

0.4

Total Apricot

0.5 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

5.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.5

2.3

37.0 %

52.9 %

48.4 %

39.3 %

43.2 %

0.4

2.2

2.0

2.9 %

4.2 %

6.6 %

35.8 %

36.4 %

1.4

0.2

0.3

0.3

17.3 %

18.5 %

3.0 %

5.5 %

4.7 %

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

3.7 %

5.3 %

3.8 %

3.6 %

4.3 %

0.4

0.4

0.3

6.0 %

5.8 %

6.3 %

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

5.8 %

5.2 %

3.9 %

3.7 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.7 %

2.0 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

0.1

0.0

2.1 %

0.0 %

0.5

0.1

0.0

7.2 %

2.1 %

0.0 %

1.2

0.1

0.0

17.9 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

- Nectar Family
- La Vita

0.9

- DaGio
- Hello

0.7

- Ritam

0.7

- Takovo Best

9.3 %

6.7 %
8.6 %

- Others

0.1

0.5 %

- Meridijan

0.1

0.9 %

- Moc Prirode

1.2

11.3 %

- Su Voce

0.8

7.7 %

- Golf

0.3

0.3

Total Cherry

7.8

5.5

6.4

4.9

- Nectar

4.2

3.2

3.1

- La Vita

0.5

0.5

- Vocna Dolina
- DaGio

0.1

- Nectar Family

2.8 %

4.0 %

3.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.2

1.9

54.5 %

58.2 %

48.1 %

45.3 %

49.1 %

1.4

0.8

0.7

5.8 %

8.9 %

21.9 %

16.9 %

16.6 %

0.3

1.0

0.7

4.7 %

19.6 %

17.3 %

0.0

0.3

0.3

0.5 %

5.5 %

7.1 %

0.3

0.3

0.2

4.7 %

5.5 %

6.1 %

0.9 %

- Takovo

0.3

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.9 %

9.8 %

0.8 %

2.9 %

3.5 %

- Next Classic

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.8 %

4.5 %

2.3 %

2.6 %

0.3 %

- Golf

1.1

0.9

0.7

0.1

0.0

14.3 %

15.5 %

10.9 %

1.2 %

0.0 %

- Moc Prirode

0.8

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

10.3 %

2.2 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3

0.0

0.0

4.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Takovo Best
- Hello

0.3

3.7 %

- Su Voce

0.0

0.2 %

- Nature

0.1

0.6 %

- Duga

0.3

3.9 %

Total Vegetable

PDF Editor

0.9

1.8

1.4

Million Litres
2006

2007

% Share

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

0.9

1.7

0.9

100.0 %

91.5 %

69.3 %

0.2

0.4

8.5 %

30.7 %

2.1

1.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Verde

0.6

0.7

30.2 %

42.6 %

- Hello Fruit Party

1.1

0.6

52.1 %

41.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.3

42.9 %

12.7 %

16.4 %

0.6

0.4

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

57.1 %

5.0 %

0.0 %

0.4

3.1

3.5

2.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- La Vita Happy

2.9

2.2

1.4

92.1 %

62.7 %

49.6 %

- Vocna Dolina

0.2

1.3

1.4

6.4 %

37.2 %

49.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.6 %

0.1 %

1.4 %

- La Vita
- Moc Prirode
Total Pineapple

0.6

- Nectar Family
- Hello
Total Pear

0.9

0.2

0.7

2006

2007

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Classic

0.1

15.1 %

39.7 %

- Golf

0.1

5.8 %

- Moc Prirode

0.3

35.0 %

- Su Voce

0.2

0.0

26.5 %

7.4 %

- Nectar

0.2

0.2

17.5 %

52.9 %

100.0 %

Total Grapefruit

0.4

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.4

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Banana

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Buci-Buci

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Citrus

0.1

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Classic

0.1

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Mango

0.1

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

- Froovy

0.1

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Quince

0.8

0.3

- Vocna Dolina

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

- La Vita

0.1

0.1

- Nectar

0.8

0.2

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

0.0

92.5 %
7.3 %

31.0 %

92.7 %

69.0 %

100.0 %

7.5 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Nectars

4.6

7.2

7.4

7.6

6.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Fortified

4.6

7.2

7.4

7.4

6.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Nectar Plus

3.5

4.8

3.9

2.6

2.3

76.3 %

66.7 %

52.7 %

34.2 %

35.6 %

- Next Classic

0.5

1.0

1.3

1.3

1.4

11.7 %

14.5 %

17.4 %

16.9 %

21.9 %

0.7

1.6

1.5

1.4

9.1 %

21.0 %

19.6 %

22.3 %

0.8

0.5

10.8 %

7.9 %

0.7

0.2

9.3 %

2.6 %

0.2

0.2

3.0 %

2.9 %

0.3

0.0

3.6 %

0.0 %

Total Nutraceutical

0.2

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Bodytime

0.2

0.4

2.7 %

6.8 %

- Bravo (Rauch)
- Hello Fruit Party
- Next Bodytime

0.0

- Next Buci-Buci
- Hello

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.3 %

12.0 %

9.7 %

8.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

- Moc Prirode

19.9

3.9

4.2

0.9

2.0

13.9 %

2.6 %

2.4 %

0.6 %

1.5 %

12.5

7.7

2.1

0.0

8.3 %

4.5 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

Total

- Ritam
Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

- Nature

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

5.2

6.9

7.6

8.1

8.4

3.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

5.1 %

6.1 %

- Su Voce

19.1

2.4

2.3

1.8

1.3

13.3 %

1.6 %

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

4.3 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

- DaGio

2.3

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

1.6 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

- Duga

3.8

Fruvita

8.6

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

5.5 %

6.6 %

Coca-Cola
- Next

2.6 %
12.1

- Froovy

14.0

29.0

25.4

0.7

0.1

0.0

8.7

9.1

- Frutta di Primavera

6.0 %

- Hello

7.2

4.6

3.9

6.4

3.4

5.0 %

3.1 %

2.3 %

4.0 %

2.5 %

- Vocna Dolina

1.5

7.5

9.3

13.7

12.8

1.0 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

IB Team

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

- Verde

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- Golf

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Meridijan

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Metro

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

- Aro

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

- Nectar

40.1

43.5

42.4

31.7

29.7

27.9 %

28.8 %

24.7 %

19.9 %

21.6 %

11.9

10.8

10.3

6.9 %

6.8 %

7.5 %

5.0

4.3

4.7

4.9

3.3 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

3.7

3.6

4.2

4.4

2.5 %

2.1 %

2.6 %

3.2 %

1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Rauch

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

1.0

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.7 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

- Happy Day

0.3

- Vocne Kapi
Others

1.5

- Other Private Label


- Others

1.5

1.0 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

Swisslion

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

- Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

- La Vita

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

- Moc Prirode

19.9

3.9

4.2

0.9

2.0

13.9 %

2.6 %

2.4 %

0.6 %

1.5 %

12.5

7.7

2.1

0.0

8.3 %

4.5 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

Total

- Ritam
Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

- Nature

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

7.4

6.6

6.6

7.0

4.3 %

4.9 %

3.8 %

4.2 %

5.1 %

- DaGio

2.3

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

1.6 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

- Duga

3.8

2.5 %

2.1 %

2.6 %

3.2 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

- Other Private Label


Fresh & Co

24.3

2.6 %
3.7

3.6

4.2

4.4

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

PDF Editor

16.9 %

Million Litres

- Next
- Su Voce
Fruvita

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

5.2

6.9

7.6

8.1

8.4

3.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

5.1 %

6.1 %

19.1

2.4

2.3

1.8

1.3

13.3 %

1.6 %

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

0.7

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

8.7

9.1

5.5 %

6.6 %

- Froovy
- Frutta di Primavera
- Hello

7.2

4.6

3.9

6.4

3.4

5.0 %

3.1 %

2.3 %

4.0 %

2.5 %

- Vocna Dolina

1.5

7.5

9.3

13.7

12.8

1.0 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

IB Team

2.9

5.7

8.3

10.4

8.2

2.0 %

3.8 %

4.8 %

6.5 %

5.9 %

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- Golf

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Meridijan

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

- Nectar

40.1

43.5

42.4

31.7

29.7

27.9 %

28.8 %

24.7 %

19.8 %

21.6 %

11.9

10.8

10.3

6.9 %

6.8 %

7.5 %

- Aro
- Verde

- Vocne Kapi
Others

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

- Others

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Rauch

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

1.0

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.7 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

- Happy Day

0.3

0.2 %

Swisslion Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

- Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

- La Vita

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

IB Team

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

Swisslion

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

4.3 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

Fruvita
Coca-Cola

Rauch
Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

Metro
Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Others

1.5

5.0

4.3

1.0 %

3.3 %

2.5 %

4.7

4.9

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

IB Team

2.9

5.7

8.3

10.4

8.2

2.0 %

3.8 %

4.8 %

6.5 %

5.9 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

7.4

6.6

6.6

7.0

4.3 %

4.9 %

3.8 %

4.2 %

5.1 %

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

Fruvita
Fresh & Co

Swisslion Takovo
Rauch
Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Others

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.5

0.5

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Long Life

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Non-Refillable

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Non-Refillable

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Long Life

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Nectars

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Long Life

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

123.2

144.4

137.6

119.1

122.7

81.7 %

84.2 %

86.3 %

86.6 %

86.2 %

123.2

144.4

137.6

119.1

122.7

81.7 %

84.2 %

86.3 %

86.6 %

86.2 %

- 20cl

10.5

8.2

2.4

2.2

2.2

6.9 %

4.8 %

1.5 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- 25cl

0.8

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.9

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- 33cl

1.6

2.3

2.3

2.2

2.4

1.0 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- 50cl

0.3

0.2

0.2 %

0.1 %

- 100cl

74.3

72.6

63.5

61.1

62.5

49.3 %

42.3 %

39.8 %

44.4 %

43.9 %

- 150cl

20.1

20.8

16.2

14.5

14.9

13.3 %

12.2 %

10.2 %

10.6 %

10.5 %

- 200cl

15.6

39.2

52.3

38.2

39.7

10.4 %

22.9 %

32.8 %

27.8 %

27.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Carton

- Foil

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Pouch

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 20cl

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Glass

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

- Bottle

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

- 20cl

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

- Metal

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Can

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 33cl

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

17.8

17.3

16.6

13.9

14.8

11.8 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

- Bottle

17.8

17.3

16.6

13.9

14.8

11.8 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

- 150cl

8.0

7.8

16.1

13.6

14.5

5.3 %

4.5 %

10.1 %

9.9 %

10.2 %

- 200cl

9.8

9.5

0.5

0.3

0.3

6.5 %

5.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- PET

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Nectars

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

123.2

144.4

137.6

119.1

122.7

81.7 %

84.2 %

86.3 %

86.6 %

86.2 %

123.2

144.4

137.6

119.1

122.7

81.7 %

84.2 %

86.3 %

86.6 %

86.2 %

- 20cl

10.5

8.2

2.4

2.2

2.2

6.9 %

4.8 %

1.5 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- 25cl

0.8

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.9

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

- 33cl

1.6

2.3

2.3

2.2

2.4

1.0 %

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- 50cl

0.3

0.2

0.2 %

0.1 %

- 100cl

74.3

72.6

63.5

61.1

62.5

49.3 %

42.3 %

39.8 %

44.4 %

43.9 %

- 150cl

20.1

20.8

16.2

14.5

14.9

13.3 %

12.2 %

10.2 %

10.6 %

10.5 %

- 200cl

15.6

39.2

52.3

38.2

39.7

10.4 %

22.9 %

32.8 %

27.8 %

27.9 %

- Carton

- Foil

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Pouch

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 20cl

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Glass

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

- Bottle

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

- 20cl

9.5

9.7

5.2

4.5

4.8

6.3 %

5.6 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

- Metal

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Can

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 33cl

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

17.8

17.3

16.6

13.9

14.8

11.8 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

- Bottle

17.8

17.3

16.6

13.9

14.8

11.8 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

10.1 %

10.4 %

- 150cl

8.0

7.8

16.1

13.6

14.5

5.3 %

4.5 %

10.1 %

9.9 %

10.2 %

- 200cl

9.8

9.5

0.5

0.3

0.3

6.5 %

5.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- PET

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.6

142.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

118.7

134.2

134.9

115.0

118.4

78.7 %

78.3 %

84.5 %

83.6 %

83.1 %

On-Premise

32.1

37.3

24.7

22.6

24.0

21.3 %

21.7 %

15.5 %

16.4 %

16.9 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

Chart - Still Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 .............................................................. 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Still Drinks Trademarks 2008-2010 ....................................................................................................... 3
Functional Products ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Still Drinks New Products 2010 ........................................................................................................................... 5
Still Drinks New Products Photo Shots 2010 ...................................................................................................... 5
Still Drinks Trademark Owners and Local Operators .......................................................................................... 6
Still Drinks Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011.......................................................................................... 6
Still Drinks Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011.......................................................................................... 7
Still Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ................................................................................... 7
Still Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ............................................................................ 8
Still Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ........................................................................... 8
Still Drinks Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F.............................................................................................. 8
Still Drinks All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................................... 9
Still Drinks Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................................ 10
Still Drinks Private Label Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010.................................................................................. 13
Still Drinks Functional Brands, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................................ 13
Still Drinks All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................. 14
Still Drinks All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................................... 15
Still Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 17
Still Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................. 18
Still Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F..................................................... 18
Still Drinks Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ................................................................................. 19

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

102.0

13.9

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

6.9 %

1.0 %

-5.4 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

4,293.59

42.10

59.72

0.59

Segmentation 2010

Others

Orange

% Share

75.0 %

25.0 %

Off-Premise

On-Premise

90.9 %

9.1 %

PET

Board

Foil

Other

85.9 %

13.6 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)

Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


The still drinks market posted further declines of 5%. Mounting pressure to renegotiate contracts at more
favourable terms squeezed producers margins and affected the shelf share of retailers own labels.
Producers sought out methods to reduce costs, often at the expense of the marketing budgets. One of these
methods was trying to reduce the listing price of products in retailers.

Outlook
As the producers start putting the main focus on profitability in 2011, the volumes will recover slower than
expected.

Segmentation
The most dominant flavour was orange, accounting for over 30% market share. Flavour mixes followed
behind, with 26% of the market, followed by apple, with 14% of the market. Flavour mixes were popular
because producers (who have their own local fruit stock) can optimize the flavour depending on the
purchasing cost (eg orange flavour prices increased during 2010).

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Hello

Fruvita

33.2

32.5

28.2

Na Eks

Bahus

7.2

14.2

14.9

Su Voce

Coca-Cola

14.5

10.6

9.0

Juice Up

Knjaz Milos

6.2

8.1

Bravo (Rauch)

Rauch

6.8

7.7

7.9

Frutella

Rodic

13.4

7.7

7.7

Next

Coca-Cola

3.8

4.1

3.8

Rauch

Rauch

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Elixir Natura

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

3.0
1.2

2.6
1.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Fruvita was the category leader, having 28% of the market share, although it declined by 13% in 2010. Bahus
grew by 5% and confirmed its position as a popular brand. Its brand Na Eks performed well in a declining
category.
Pehar had a strong above the line campaign. Most of the larger producers of still drinks declined. Rauch, with
the brand Bravo, was the exception. It also introduced its new brand, Limessa (200cl carton), that was
supported with marketing activity and achieved a 3% share in less than nine months.

PDF Editor

Juice Up (Knjaz Milos) and La Vita (Vino Zupa) recorded double digit growth, but still with insignificant
volumes. Fun (Nectar) was phased out in 2010. Juice Up had a lot of power from their brand owner behind
them which supported its development.

Functional Products
Akva Viva Slim (Knjaz Milos) performed well in 2008 but a lack of marketing support caused it to decline
sharply in 2010.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


As the branded players reduced production costs and provided highly affordable prices (compared with
Private Label brands), Private Label share fell down by 21%. Consumers were less willing to try unfamiliar
flavours in 2010, as money was their main focus.

Marketing
Most of the marketing activities were focused on price promotions at point of sale, with the only exception
being Limessa. Limessa had excellent packaging, (in 200cl carton) and they were also relatively low priced.
La Vita was not affected by the lab tests taken in the nectars category and the subsequent negative publicity.

Pricing/Valuation
Average prices increased by 10% in the off-premise and 13% in on-premise, following the currency
depreciation.

Packaging
Consumers turned away from smaller pack sizes because of a higher price per litre and also due to the
decline in impulse shopping. PET had 86% of the share, but fell by 7%, driven by the decline in Fruvita and
the growth of Limessa, who use carton. A larger drop of PET was prevented by La Vita, Na Eks and recently
launched Pehar.

Distribution
Off-premise held 91% of this category. Among the off-premise, only large modern retail showed a positive
trend, growing by 4%. This was mostly driven during weekend promotions, especially in Delta-Maxi and Rodic
M.

PDF Editor

New Products 2010

Company
Elixir Natura

Brand
Pehar

Rauch

Limessa

Flavour(s)
Apple,
multivitamin,
lemon,orange
Orange,
Multivitamin,
Apple, Peach

Pack
Type/Size
200 cl PET

200 cl carton

Source : Canadean

Figure 1: Elixir Natural Pehar


Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Figure 2 : Rauch Limessa

Price
RSD78.80

RSD123.00
RSD124.99

Comment
(Figure 1)

New brand from still drinks


category (Figure 2)

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aqua Viva

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Bravo (Rauch)

Rauch

Rauch

Elixir Natura

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

Rauch

Frutella

Rodic

Rodic

Fun

Nectar

Nectar

Hello

Fruvita

Fruvita

Jana

Agrokor

Jamnica

Jodi

Minaqua

Minaqua

Juice Up

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Vino Zupa

Na Eks

Bahus

Bahus

Next

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Rauch

Rauch

Rauch

Rosa

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Su Voce

Coca-Cola

Fresh & Co

Vocne Kapi

Nectar

Nectar

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

33

FRUTELA

17.41

17.74

24.00

52.76

53.76

72.73

50

BRAVO

37.20

44.99

48.90

74.40

89.98

97.80

50

FRU (RODIC)

29.50

31.49

50

HELLO

39.99

50.90

50

JUICE UP

38.99

48.90

50

MULTISOLA

54.50

65.89

50

NA EKS ( BAHUS)

25.96

29.00

50

NEXT JOY

48.99

51.90

50

RELAX (RODIC)

25.84

27.90

49.85

54.99

82.99

92.90

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NRPET

34.89
63.80
48.90

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

59.00

62.98

69.78

79.98

101.80

77.98

97.80

127.60

109.00

131.78

51.92

58.00

97.98

103.80

51.68

55.80

33.23

36.66

55.33

61.93

97.80

150

BIPSI

150

BRAVO

150

FRU (RODIC)

63.72

67.99

42.48

45.33

150

FRUTELLA

38.99

45.99

25.99

30.66

150

FUN (NECTAR)

150

HELLO

150

JUICE UP

PDF Editor

74.80

49.87

75.00
69.79

50.00

79.99

93.90

66.99

89.90

46.53

53.33

62.60

44.66

59.93

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

150

LA VITA

59.60

39.73

150

NEXT JOY

79.99

87.90

53.33

58.60

150

RELAX (RODIC)

48.50

51.90

32.33

34.60

200

ALPELLA (RODIC)

55.34

58.69

27.67

29.35

200

FRUTELLA

48.03

53.57

24.02

26.79

200

NA EKS ( BAHUS)

59.00

82.90

29.50

41.45

200

TOP BUDGET (INTEREX)

44.00

48.00

22.00

24.00

FRU (DUGA)

15.50

17.90

77.50

89.50

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

CARTON

20

SOURCE : Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

50

FRUC (FRUCTAL)

125.00

250.00

50

HELLO (FRUVITTA)

120.00

100.00

110.00

240.00

200.00

220.00

50

NEXT JOY

110.00

100.00

110.00

220.00

200.00

220.00

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NR PET

SOURCE : Canadean

Production

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

12.0

12.5

19.5

45.0

55.7

72.0

78.1

97.9

121.1

120.5

114.7

118.8

2.1

0.6

0.5

1.1

1.7

2.3

1.9

1.4

1.3

1.3

0.2

0.7

1.2

14.7

14.1

14.0

14.2

72.9

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

Imports
Exports
Consumption

12.0

12.5

21.6

45.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

56.2

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

2.3

1.9

1.4

1.3

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Croatia

0.7

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.8

31.2 %

47.8 %

61.4 %

62.5 %

64.3 %

Slovenia

0.6

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.4

25.8 %

31.3 %

35.0 %

34.3 %

32.6 %

Austria

1.0

0.4

0.1

0.0

0.0

43.0 %

20.9 %

3.6 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

1.2

14.7

14.1

14.0

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

9.1

9.3

9.5

9.5

62.0 %

66.3 %

67.4 %

67.1 %

Bosnia-Herzegovina
Montenegro

0.3

4.6

4.2

4.2

4.3

27.5 %

31.7 %

30.0 %

30.1 %

30.6 %

Kosovo

0.9

0.9

0.5

0.4

0.3

72.5 %

6.3 %

3.8 %

2.5 %

2.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Orange

46.9

50.1

37.2

33.4

33.3

47.4 %

46.3 %

34.5 %

32.8 %

31.5 %

5.9

9.5

24.0

26.6

27.9

6.0 %

8.8 %

22.2 %

26.1 %

26.3 %

Apple

12.3

13.2

14.7

14.2

15.4

12.4 %

12.1 %

13.6 %

13.9 %

14.5 %

Lemon

10.1

10.2

8.1

8.7

9.0

10.2 %

9.4 %

7.5 %

8.5 %

8.5 %

Berries

4.2

3.0

5.5

5.7

6.0

4.2 %

2.8 %

5.1 %

5.5 %

5.7 %

Pineapple

2.0

2.2

4.4

4.6

4.7

2.0 %

2.0 %

4.1 %

4.5 %

4.4 %

Other Fruit

11.4

11.4

6.5

3.4

4.2

11.5 %

10.5 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

4.0 %

Peach

0.8

4.0

3.4

1.4

1.5

0.8 %

3.7 %

3.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

Cherry

2.8

2.4

1.5

1.4

1.4

2.8 %

2.2 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

0.3

0.7

0.8

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Flavour Mixes

Herbs and Spices


Lemon-Lime

0.3

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.7

0.3 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

Apricot

0.8

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

Grapefruit

1.0

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.3

1.0 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

Grape

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Melon
Nut/Seed

0.1

0.1

PDF Editor

0.1 %

0.1 %

Million Litres
2007
Citrus
Other Non Fruit

0.1

% Share

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

2007

0.1 %

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Hello

22.0

28.6

33.2

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

28.8 %

30.7 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

14.9

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

13.2 %

14.6 %

10.1

14.5

10.6

9.0

10.2 %

13.4 %

9.8 %

8.8 %

6.2

8.1

5.7 %

8.0 %

Na Eks
Su Voce
Juice Up
Bravo (Rauch)
Frutella

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

7.9

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

7.8 %

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

2.1

3.8

4.1

3.8

2.1 %

3.5 %

3.8 %

3.7 %

Next
Rauch

3.0

La Vita

1.2

Elixir Natura
Jodi

3.0 %

2.6

1.1 %

1.4
2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

Jana

0.8

1.0

0.8

Aqua Viva

0.3

1.2

Vocne Kapi
Rosa

2.5 %
1.3 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.7

0.6

0.3 %

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

3.8

3.6

0.1

3.5 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.8

0.0

0.7 %

0.0 %

Fun

2.7 %

Frutela

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

Bipsi

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

0.6

4.6 %

0.8 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Ritam
Golf

3.6

0.8

Meridijan

0.0

0.0

Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

Nectar

7.4

9.3 %

Fruvita

0.2

0.1

Mambo

1.0

1.3 %

Caramba

0.1

0.1 %

Licky

0.2

0.2

Mila

0.1

0.1

Twister

6.8

5.6

PDF Editor

0.0

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

6.8 %

5.2 %

0.0 %

Million Litres

Others
Other Private Label

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

13.1

14.9

10.1

12.1

11.5

16.5 %

15.0 %

9.3 %

11.2 %

11.3 %

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Orange

37.2

46.9

50.1

37.2

33.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Hello

12.4

16.8

18.9

10.8

9.5

33.3 %

35.7 %

37.7 %

29.1 %

28.4 %

- Frutella

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.5

6.4

35.3 %

28.6 %

26.8 %

20.2 %

19.2 %

- Others

2.8

7.0

5.8

6.2

6.0

7.5 %

15.0 %

11.5 %

16.6 %

18.0 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

1.9

2.4

2.8

3.1

3.2

5.0 %

5.1 %

5.5 %

8.4 %

9.5 %

2.9

5.2

4.0

2.8

6.1 %

10.3 %

10.7 %

8.2 %

0.7

0.8

1.7

1.7

1.6 %

1.6 %

4.4 %

5.0 %

0.7

1.4

1.5

1.4

1.5 %

2.8 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

- La Vita

0.3

0.5

0.8 %

1.6 %

- Juice Up

0.5

0.5

1.4 %

1.5 %

- Su Voce
- Na Eks

0.7

- Next Joy

- Rauch Limessa

1.8 %

0.8

- Frutella Relax

0.1

- Pehar

2.5 %

0.3

0.1 %

0.4

0.9 %
1.1 %

- Frutela

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

1.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

1.3 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

2.3

2.1

0.9

0.8

0.0

6.0 %

4.5 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.0

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.0 %

- Ritam
- Golf

0.3

0.7 %

- Miloduh

0.3

0.7 %

- Nectar

3.1

8.3 %

- Caramba

0.1

0.2 %

- Meridijan

0.0

- Licky
Total Flavour Mixes

1.3

- Hello
- Bravo (Rauch)

1.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.1

0.1

5.9

9.5

24.0

26.6

2.4

4.7

15.5

14.0

1.6

1.9

2.1

2.7

2.9

4.9

- Juice Up

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %
0.1 %

0.1 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

41.3 %

49.1 %

64.8 %

52.6 %

27.4 %

19.9 %

8.8 %

10.2 %

12.2 %

18.3 %

- Next Joy

0.7

1.7

1.8

1.6

11.9 %

17.7 %

7.4 %

5.8 %

- Others

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.5

3.4 %

2.2 %

2.0 %

1.8 %

0.4

0.9

1.7 %

3.2 %

- La Vita

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

- Frutella Relax
- Aqua Viva

0.2

0.2

% Share
2009

2010

0.1

0.5

0.2

0.2

2006

2007

3.7 %

2008

2.3 %

2009

2010

0.3 %

1.8 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

- Rauch Limessa

0.7

2.8 %

- Pehar

0.7

2.7 %

- Ritam

0.4

0.5

- Golf Adventures

0.2

- Licky

6.8 %

5.6 %

0.2

3.7 %

2.1 %

0.1

0.1

1.7 %

1.2 %

12.3

13.2

14.7

14.2

100.0 %

7.3

9.3

6.4

6.1

1.2

0.7

1.1

1.1

- Hello

2.7

- Juice Up

Total Apple

5.0

- Su Voce
- Others

0.8

0.5

0.0

1.9 %

0.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

59.2 %

70.6 %

43.8 %

43.1 %

10.1 %

5.6 %

7.7 %

7.6 %

2.3

18.4 %

16.5 %

2.1

2.2

14.3 %

15.2 %

100.0 %

15.7 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.6

7.6 %

4.0 %

4.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

- Jodi

0.7

0.8

0.8

0.5

0.5

14.3 %

6.2 %

6.1 %

3.4 %

3.7 %

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.2

5.4 %

5.3 %

3.7 %

1.4 %

- Next Joy
- Rauch Limessa

0.7

- Aqua Viva

0.1

0.1

0.1

- Pehar

5.1 %

0.1

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.3

- Jana

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.9

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.6 %
2.1 %

- Bipsi

1.2

22.8 %

- Golf

0.9

17.8 %

- Nectar

1.1

21.8 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

7.5 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

0.0 %

- Fruvita

0.2

0.1

1.7 %

0.8 %

- Golf Adventures

0.5

0.4

4.3 %

2.9 %

Total Lemon

9.8

10.1

10.2

8.1

8.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Na Eks

2.3

2.6

2.9

5.6

5.9

23.5 %

25.7 %

28.0 %

69.0 %

67.9 %

- Hello

5.4

6.8

7.1

2.1

2.0

54.9 %

67.6 %

69.1 %

26.1 %

22.9 %

- Others

1.1

0.7

0.3

0.3

0.3

11.0 %

6.6 %

2.9 %

4.2 %

3.6 %

0.1

0.5

0.7 %

5.6 %

- Frutella Relax
- Miloduh

0.0

0.4 %

- Mambo

1.0

10.2 %

Total Berries

4.6

4.2

3.0

5.5

5.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Na Eks

1.1

1.3

1.4

2.8

2.9

25.2 %

30.9 %

47.1 %

51.4 %

51.6 %

- Others

1.5

1.0

0.6

0.8

0.7

33.1 %

23.9 %

19.4 %

14.9 %

13.1 %

0.4

1.0

7.1 %

17.5 %

0.4

0.4

8.0 %

6.9 %

0.6

0.6

11.6 %

10.8 %

- La Vita
- Jana

0.4

- Juice Up

PDF Editor

0.5

9.5 %

16.6 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Bipsi

1.9

1.5

0.5

0.4

0.0

41.7 %

35.7 %

16.9 %

7.0 %

0.0 %

Total Pineapple

1.7

2.0

2.2

4.4

4.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Na Eks

1.7

1.9

2.1

4.2

4.4

100.0 %

93.2 %

93.9 %

95.5 %

96.2 %

- Others

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

5.8 %

5.3 %

4.5 %

3.8 %

- Licky

0.0

0.0

1.0 %

0.8 %

Total Other Fruit

8.2

11.4

11.4

6.5

3.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.6

1.3

11.4 %

10.5 %

12.8 %

25.1 %

39.7 %

- Other PL

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

3.7 %

3.9 %

4.8 %

25.7 %

38.7 %

- Hello

1.4

2.2

2.5

1.3

0.4

16.8 %

19.3 %

21.7 %

19.9 %

10.5 %

- Others

2.4

0.8

0.3

0.2

0.1

29.0 %

6.9 %

2.6 %

2.3 %

4.2 %

0.1

0.2

1.5 %

5.9 %

0.9

0.0

13.9 %

0.4 %

0.8

0.0

11.6 %

0.6 %

- La Vita
- Vocne Kapi

1.0

- Fun

8.9 %

- Miloduh

0.0

0.5 %

- Nectar

3.2

38.6 %

- Twister

6.8

5.6

59.4 %

49.2 %

Total Cherry

5.6

2.8

2.4

1.5

1.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

1.7

1.3

0.7

1.1

1.0

30.6 %

44.8 %

31.3 %

72.4 %

70.6 %

- Jodi

1.5

1.5

1.6

0.4

0.4

25.8 %

54.5 %

68.0 %

27.6 %

29.4 %

- Golf

2.5

0.7 %

0.7 %

- Licky

43.6 %
0.0

0.0

Total Peach

0.9

0.8

4.0

3.4

1.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.9

0.8

0.4

0.5

0.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

11.1 %

15.9 %

38.6 %

- Rauch Limessa

0.7

51.4 %

- Vocne Kapi

2.8

2.7

0.1

70.6 %

79.6 %

7.2 %

- Rosa Emotion

0.2

0.2

0.0

5.8 %

4.5 %

2.9 %

- Aqua Viva

0.5

0.0

0.0

12.6 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Apricot

0.9

0.8

0.5

0.7

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.9

0.8

0.5

0.7

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Lemon-Lime

0.3

0.8

0.8

0.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Jana

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.4

100.0 %

50.5 %

44.7 %

53.6 %

0.4

0.4

0.3

49.5 %

55.3 %

46.4 %

- Aqua Viva Slim


Total Grapefruit

4.0

1.0

0.5

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

1.1

0.7

0.3

0.3

0.3

27.2 %

67.4 %

64.2 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Hello

2.9

0.3

0.2

0.0

0.0

72.8 %

32.6 %

35.8 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Herbs and Spices

0.3

0.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Next Joy

0.3

0.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Nut/Seed

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Melon

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Su Voce

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Citrus

0.2

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Rosa Emotion

0.2

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Grape

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

85.4 %

89.7 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Licky

0.0

0.0

14.6 %

10.3 %

Total Other Non Fruit

0.1

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mila

0.1

0.1

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Other Fruit

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Other PL

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Still Drinks

22.0

30.4

36.0

40.1

36.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Fortified

22.0

30.4

35.6

39.7

36.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Hello

22.0

28.6

33.2

32.5

28.2

100.0 %

93.8 %

92.4 %

81.0 %

76.4 %

6.2

8.1

15.4 %

22.1 %

- Juice Up
- Aqua Viva

0.3

0.8

0.3

0.3

1.1 %

2.3 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

- Ritam

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

2.0 %

2.3 %

1.7 %

0.0 %

- Fruvita

0.2

0.1

0.7 %

0.3 %

- Golf Adventures

0.8

0.6

2.5 %

1.6 %

Total Nutraceutical

0.4

0.4

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Aqua Viva Slim

0.4

0.4

0.3

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

- Ritam

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

Agrokor

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

- Jana

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Total

Bahus

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

14.9

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

13.2 %

14.6 %

- Na Eks

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

14.9

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

13.2 %

14.6 %

Bip Belgrade

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

2.1

3.8

4.1

3.8

2.1 %

3.5 %

3.8 %

3.7 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

10.6

9.0

10.2 %

13.4 %

9.8 %

8.8 %

Coca-Cola
- Next
- Rosa
- Su Voce

10.1

14.5

Duga Fruit

0.2

0.2

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Licky

0.2

0.2

0.2 %

0.2 %

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

1.4

1.3 %

- Elixir Natura

1.4

1.3 %

Fruvita

22.0

28.8

33.3

0.2

0.1

22.0

28.6

33.2

32.5

28.2

3.6

1.2

1.9

7.0

8.7

0.3

1.2

0.7

0.6

0.8

0.6

- Fruvita
- Hello
Knjaz Milos
- Aqua Viva
- Golf

3.6

- Juice Up

32.5

0.1

0.1

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

27.8 %

28.8 %

4.6 %

4.6 %
6.2

- Mila

28.2

30.1 %

27.6 %

30.7 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

0.3 %

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

0.5 %
5.7 %

8.0 %

8.1

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Meridjian

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Meridijan

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Minaqua

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

- Jodi

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

Nectar

8.4

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

10.6 %

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

0.8

0.0

0.7 %

0.0 %

- Fun
- Mambo

1.0

1.3 %

- Nectar

7.4

9.3 %

- Twister

6.8

5.6

PDF Editor

6.8 %

5.2 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

% Share

2008

2009

2010

3.8

3.6

0.1

- Vocne Kapi

2006

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.1 %

- Caramba

0.1

0.1 %

Others

2007

2008

2009

2010

3.5 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

13.4

15.3

10.6

13.7

12.8

16.9 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

13.1

14.9

10.1

12.1

11.5

16.5 %

15.0 %

9.3 %

11.2 %

11.3 %

Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

11.0

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

10.7 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

7.9

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

7.8 %

- Other Private Label


- Others

- Rauch

3.0

3.0 %

Rodic

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

- Frutella

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

Swisslion

0.4

0.4 %

- Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

Vino Zupa

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

- La Vita

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Frutela

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agroekonomik

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

- Ritam

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

Bahus

14.2

14.9

13.2 %

14.6 %

- Na Eks

14.2

14.9

13.2 %

14.6 %

Total

Bip Belgrade

11.1

11.0

8.9

1.6

0.0

14.0 %

11.1 %

8.2 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Na Eks

5.8

6.5

7.2

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

Duga Fruit

0.2

0.2

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Licky

0.2

0.2

0.2 %

0.2 %

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

2.1

3.8

4.1

3.8

2.1 %

3.5 %

3.8 %

3.7 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Fresh & Co
- Next
- Rosa

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

10.1

14.5

10.6

9.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

0.2

0.1

28.5

33.2

32.5

28.2

Jamnica

0.8

1.0

0.8

- Jana

0.8

1.0

1.2

- Su Voce
Fruvita

22.0

- Fruvita
- Hello

22.0

Knjaz Milos

3.6

- Aqua Viva
- Golf

3.6

2007

2008

2009

2010

10.2 %

13.4 %

9.8 %

8.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

28.8 %

30.7 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.8

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

1.9

7.0

8.7

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

0.3

1.2

0.7

0.6

0.3 %

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.8

0.6

0.8 %

0.5 %
5.7 %

8.0 %

- Juice Up
0.1

0.1

27.8 %

27.8 %

4.6 %

4.6 %
6.2

- Mila

2006

8.1

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Meridjian

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Meridijan

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Minaqua

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

- Jodi

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

Nectar

8.4

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

10.6 %

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

0.8

0.0

0.7 %

0.0 %

3.5 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

- Fun
- Mambo

1.0

1.3 %

- Nectar

7.4

9.3 %

- Twister

6.8

- Vocne Kapi

5.6
3.8

6.8 %
3.6

0.1

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.1 %

- Caramba

0.1

0.1 %

Others

5.2 %

13.4

15.3

10.6

13.7

12.8

16.9 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.7

1.3

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

13.1

14.9

10.1

12.1

11.5

16.5 %

15.0 %

9.3 %

11.2 %

11.3 %

Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

12.3

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

12.1 %

- Bravo (Rauch)

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

7.9

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

7.8 %

- Other Private Label


- Others

- Elixir Natura

1.4

1.3 %

- Rauch

3.0

3.0 %

Rodic

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

- Frutella

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

1.1 %

2.5 %

Swisslion Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

- Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

Vino Zupa

1.2

PDF Editor

2.6

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

- La Vita

% Share
2009

2010

1.2

2.6

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1.1 %

2.5 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Frutela

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fruvita

22.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

Bahus

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

14.9

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

13.2 %

14.6 %

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

Coca-Cola
Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

11.0

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

10.7 %

Knjaz Milos

3.6

1.2

1.9

7.0

8.7

4.6 %

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Rodic
Vino Zupa
Elixir Natura D.o.o.
Minaqua

1.4
2.2

Agrokor

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

1.3 %
2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Nectar

8.4

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

10.6 %

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

Bip Belgrade

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

Agroekonomik
Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

Meridjian

0.0

Duga Fruit
Swisslion
Others

0.1 %
0.0
0.2

0.0 %
0.2

0.4
13.4

0.0 %
0.2 %

0.2 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

0.4 %
15.3

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

10.6

13.7

12.8

16.9 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fruvita

22.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

14.2

14.9

13.2 %

14.6 %

Bahus
Fresh & Co

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

12.3

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

12.1 %

Knjaz Milos

3.6

1.2

1.9

7.0

8.7

4.6 %

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Rodic
Vino Zupa
Minaqua

2.2

Jamnica

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Nectar

8.4

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

10.6 %

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

Bip Belgrade

11.1

11.0

8.9

1.6

0.0

14.0 %

11.1 %

8.2 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

Agroekonomik
Swisslion Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.1 %

Meridjian

0.0

Duga Fruit
Others

13.4

0.0

0.0 %

0.2

0.2

15.3

10.6

13.7

12.8

16.9 %

0.0 %
0.2 %

0.2 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Still Drinks

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.1

105.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

98.7

107.9

107.7

102.0

105.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

17.7

20.8

12.6

13.9

17.6

17.9 %

19.2 %

11.7 %

13.6 %

16.6 %

17.7

20.8

12.6

13.9

17.6

17.9 %

19.2 %

11.7 %

13.6 %

16.6 %

- 20cl

3.0

3.7

1.7

1.6

1.4

3.0 %

3.4 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

- 25cl

2.6

2.3

0.9

0.8

0.8

2.6 %

2.1 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

- 100cl

3.0

1.7

0.3

0.3

0.4

3.0 %

1.6 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- 150cl

0.6

4.8

4.6

3.4

3.4

0.6 %

4.5 %

4.3 %

3.3 %

3.2 %

- 200cl

8.7

8.3

5.1

7.9

11.7

8.7 %

7.7 %

4.8 %

7.7 %

11.1 %

- Carton

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.4

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Pouch

0.4

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- 20cl

0.4

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Metal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Can

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 33cl

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Foil

- PET

80.4

86.7

94.7

87.7

87.8

81.2 %

80.0 %

87.8 %

85.9 %

83.0 %

- Bottle

80.4

86.7

94.7

87.7

87.8

81.2 %

80.0 %

87.8 %

85.9 %

83.0 %

- 33cl

0.7

0.7

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- 50cl

6.4

6.1

14.6

12.6

13.0

6.4 %

5.6 %

13.6 %

12.4 %

12.2 %

- 70cl

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.7

0.7

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- 150cl

42.7

47.1

49.8

44.7

45.8

43.2 %

43.5 %

46.2 %

43.8 %

43.3 %

- 200cl

23.7

25.9

29.3

29.2

28.0

23.9 %

23.9 %

27.1 %

28.6 %

26.4 %

- 500cl

6.0

5.9

0.3

0.2

0.1

6.0 %

5.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Total Refillable

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Glass

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bottle

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 20cl

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

105.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

88.4

95.6

97.1

92.7

96.9

89.3 %

88.2 %

90.0 %

90.9 %

91.5 %

On-Premise

10.6

12.7

10.8

9.2

9.0

10.7 %

11.8 %

10.0 %

9.1 %

8.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

Chart - Squash/Syrups Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ...................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Squash/Syrups Trademarks 2008-2010 ............................................................................................... 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 3
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Squash/Syrups Trademark Owners and Local Operators .................................................................................. 4
Squash/Syrups Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .................................................................................. 5
Squash/Syrups Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ........................................................................... 5
Squash/Syrups Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F .................................................................... 5
Squash/Syrups Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F .................................................................... 6
Squash/Syrups Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ...................................................................................... 6
Squash/Syrups All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................................... 6
Squash/Syrups Private Label Trademarks, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................... 7
Squash/Syrups Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 .................................................................................................. 7
Squash/Syrups All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010............................................................................................ 9
Squash/Syrups All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................. 9
Squash/Syrups Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................. 10
Squash/Syrups Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................... 11
Squash/Syrups Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ............................................. 11
Squash/Syrups Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F .......................................................................... 12

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

29.5

4.0

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

4.0 %

5.2 %

12.9 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

Value (at consumer price)

597.35

20.26

8.31

0.28

Segmentation 2010

Others

Orange

% Share

65.3 %

34.7 %

Off-Premise

On-Premise

99.3 %

0.7 %

Glass

PET

59.4 %

40.6 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value

Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


Squash/syrups grew by 13% in 2010. The consumer base widened as the crisis made the whole market much
more price sensitive. Squash/syrups took share from nectars and still drinks.

Outlook
Although the figures showed that recovery has begun, high unemployment and low consumer confidence
created higher demand for this lower priced category. As the crisis effects were slowing, this category will
become stable.

Segmentation
Orange and lemon accounted for more than 65% of the market together. During the past few years, producers
made wider use of new flavours. Mango grew by 58%, while cherry (8%) and pineapple both grew by around
8%. This provided higher shelf share for the category, but the volumes remained low compared with the
leading flavours.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Frutella
Bip

Rodic

5.8

6.0

6.8

Bip Belgrade

2.3

3.6

5.4

Takovo

Swisslion

3.1

4.2

5.0

Nectar

Nectar

6.2

4.6

4.4

La Vita

Vino Zupa

0.6

1.2

0.7

Frubi

Rubin

0.4

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Frutella (Rodic) was the leader, with 23% of the market share which reflects growth of 13% for the year. Bip
(Bip Belgrade) introduced PET and offered a very affordable price which helped it to grow by over 50%. Price
was an important selling point.
La Vita declined as the rumours regarding the JNSD quality started to spread. Meanwhile, they have improved
the quality but struggled to make up the lost volume.
Nectar syrups held a 15% share of the total market and also contracted its volumes, but this time the high
sales price was the main cause.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Private Label almost doubled its volume since the price difference increased. Also, improved flavour ranges
supported this growth.

PDF Editor

Marketing
As the major focus for all market players, including Private Label lines, were price and shelf visibility, there
was no marketing activity at all.

Pricing/Valuation
The prices grew by 8%, even less than the currency devaluation. In this way, producers reduced their margins
in order to achieve higher turnovers.

Packaging
Glass was still dominant (60% market share) and grew by 4%. On the other hand, PET, as almost exclusive to
Private Label, grew by 29%. PET held 41% of the market and is expected to take over the leading position in
2012.

Distribution
Off-premise consumption was almost the sole distribution channel. Large modern grew by 16%. Traditional
trade remained strong.

New Products 2010


No new products in 2010.

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Bip

Bip Belgrade

Bip Belgrade

Frubi

Rubin

Rubin

Frutella

Rodic

Rodic

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Vino Zupa

Nectar

Nectar

Nectar

Takovo

Swisslion

Swisslion Takovo

SOURCE: Canadean

PDF Editor

PACK TYPE/SIZE (CL)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

NR GLASS

70

TAKOVO (SWISSLION)

186.80

196.00

201.00

44.48

46.67

47.86

100

FRUCTAL (SLOVENIA)

205.00

217.30

226.90

34.17

36.22

36.25

95.80

83.78

92.15

18.78

16.43

18.07

216.90

217.90

36.15

36.32

REFGLASS

NRPET

85

FRUTELA (RODIC)

100

FRUBI (RUBIN)

100

K PLUS PL (IDEA)

100

LA VITA (VINO ZUPA)

100

MERCATOR PL

100

NECTAR (BACKA PALANKA)

172.80
199.76

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

109.99

113.99

28.80

32.25

32.57

193.50

209.90

33.29

35.99

39.60

186.00

195.00

18.33

18.73

215.95

220.99

31.00

31.71

85

DAGIO (DUGA FRUIT)

103.50

110.90

20.29

21.75

85

PREMIA (MAXI)

115.00

169.90

18.82

27.85

85

TOP BUDGET PL (INTEREX)

96.00

99.00

22.55

23.24

176.00

159.90

29.33

26.65

100

BIPSI (BIP)

154.90

25.82

SOURCE : Canadean

Production

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

19.3

18.0

19.8

22.6

23.5

24.0

24.4

25.0

25.5

26.7

30.3

32.6

1.4

0.6

0.8

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.3

1.5

1.7

19.2

19.2

20.1

23.2

23.6

24.3

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

Imports
Exports
Consumption

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

14.3 %

13.9 %

14.1 %

14.9 %

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6

85.7 %

86.1 %

85.9 %

85.1 %

Croatia
Others

% Share

0.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

100.0 %

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.2

0.2

1.3

1.5

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.2

0.2

1.3

1.5

1.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Orange

8.0

8.3

9.3

10.6

10.6

31.4 %

31.7 %

35.6 %

35.9 %

33.5 %

Lemon

5.8

5.7

7.8

9.0

10.3

23.1 %

22.0 %

29.9 %

30.6 %

32.5 %

Other Fruit

7.2

7.8

3.6

4.0

4.3

28.5 %

30.0 %

13.8 %

13.6 %

13.7 %

Berries

1.8

1.7

2.9

3.2

3.9

7.0 %

6.7 %

11.2 %

10.9 %

12.5 %

Cherry

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

0.5

1.5 %

1.8 %

2.8 %

2.7 %

1.7 %

Apple

0.9

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.8

3.6 %

3.5 %

3.1 %

2.6 %

2.6 %

Pineapple

0.4

0.4

0.4

1.5 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

Mango

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.9 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

0.3

0.3

0.3

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

Total

Apricot

1.2

1.1

4.8 %

4.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Frutella

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Bip

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Total

Takovo
Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

La Vita

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Frubi

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Miloduh

3.5

14.1 %

Navip

0.0

0.1 %

Pivovar

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Others

5.8

6.5

6.4

6.1

6.4

23.5 %

25.5 %

24.6 %

23.2 %

21.7 %

Other Private Label

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

1.8 %

3.1 %

3.4 %

1.5 %

2.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Other Private Label

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Orange

8.1

8.0

8.3

9.3

10.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Bip

1.8

1.4

1.2

2.1

3.2

22.4 %

17.4 %

14.2 %

22.7 %

30.6 %

- Frutella

1.0

1.3

1.6

2.5

2.4

12.0 %

16.2 %

19.5 %

26.5 %

22.8 %

- Nectar

1.0

1.4

1.5

1.7

1.7

12.5 %

17.7 %

18.4 %

17.8 %

16.2 %

0.8

0.9

1.5

1.7

9.8 %

11.3 %

15.8 %

16.0 %

Total

- Takovo
- Others

2.2

2.3

2.3

1.2

1.3

27.6 %

29.4 %

28.3 %

12.8 %

11.9 %

- La Vita

0.7

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.2

8.8 %

2.6 %

1.8 %

4.0 %

2.0 %

- Frubi

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

2.8 %

2.1 %

1.9 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

- Miloduh

1.0

12.9 %

- Navip

0.0

0.4 %
4.1 %

4.2 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

- Pivovar

0.3

0.4

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.0

0.0

Total Lemon

5.4

5.8

5.7

7.8

9.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Bip

1.2

1.0

0.9

1.4

2.2

21.3 %

17.0 %

15.3 %

18.4 %

23.9 %

- Others

0.9

1.1

1.0

1.9

2.1

15.8 %

19.0 %

17.9 %

24.3 %

23.3 %

- Frutella

0.8

1.1

1.2

1.5

1.7

15.5 %

19.5 %

20.4 %

19.2 %

18.8 %

- Nectar

1.6

1.9

1.9

1.5

1.4

30.4 %

31.9 %

33.2 %

19.6 %

15.6 %

0.5

0.5

1.2

1.5

8.2 %

9.2 %

15.1 %

16.6 %

- Takovo
- La Vita

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

3.6 %

2.5 %

2.3 %

3.1 %

1.7 %

- Frubi

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Miloduh

0.6

Total Other Fruit

8.0

7.2

7.8

3.6

4.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

1.4

1.5

1.5

1.3

1.4

17.4 %

20.8 %

18.7 %

36.9 %

33.6 %

- Nectar

1.2

1.8

2.1

1.2

1.1

15.3 %

25.0 %

26.6 %

33.1 %

28.3 %

- Other PL

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

5.7 %

10.8 %

11.2 %

10.5 %

18.7 %

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

3.2 %

3.4 %

14.7 %

14.9 %

- Takovo

10.9 %

- Frutella

2.8

2.7

3.0

0.1

0.1

34.4 %

37.9 %

38.2 %

2.8 %

3.0 %

- La Vita

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

4.6 %

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

0.6 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

2009

2010

- Miloduh

1.5

18.7 %

- Pivovar

0.2

2.2 %

- Frubi

0.1

1.1 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.0

0.1

0.1

Total Berries

1.5

1.8

1.7

2.9

3.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.6

0.6

0.6

0.9

0.9

44.5 %

33.8 %

37.0 %

29.6 %

28.8 %

0.8

0.9

0.7

0.8

44.2 %

50.4 %

25.2 %

24.6 %

1.0

1.4

35.4 %

41.9 %

- Takovo
- Frutella
- La Vita

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

32.0 %

5.1 %

5.9 %

9.2 %

4.7 %

16.9 %

6.7 %

0.7 %

0.0 %

- Bip

0.5

- Miloduh

0.3

Total Apple

0.7

0.9

0.9

0.8

0.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.6

0.6

24.4 %

16.3 %

15.9 %

72.8 %

73.9 %

- Nectar

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.2

0.2

57.6 %

78.4 %

79.4 %

24.7 %

24.0 %

- La Vita

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

13.2 %

5.2 %

4.8 %

2.5 %

2.1 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.0

23.6 %

4.9 %

Total Cherry

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Takovo

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

71.9 %

75.0 %

36.5 %

37.5 %

0.3

0.4

37.8 %

47.5 %

- Frutella
- La Vita

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

28.1 %

25.0 %

25.7 %

15.0 %

Total Apricot

1.0

1.2

1.1

0.3

0.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.5

0.8

0.8

0.2

0.2

48.0 %

61.3 %

72.0 %

66.2 %

74.6 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

8.1 %

10.7 %

17.7 %

21.6 %

- Takovo
- Frubi

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

6.0 %

6.1 %

9.3 %

10.8 %

3.8 %

- Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

46.0 %

24.5 %

8.0 %

5.3 %

0.0 %

Total Pineapple

0.4

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Frutella

0.4

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Mango

0.2

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Frutella

0.2

0.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

- Bip

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

0.1 %

- Navip

0.0

0.1 %

Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

- Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Others

6.3

7.2

7.3

6.4

7.2

25.3 %

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

- Other Private Label

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

1.8 %

3.1 %

3.4 %

1.5 %

2.5 %

- Others

5.8

6.5

6.4

6.1

6.4

23.5 %

25.5 %

24.6 %

23.2 %

21.7 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

- Pivovar

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

- Frutella

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Frubi

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Swisslion

3.5

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

14.1 %

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

- Miloduh

3.5

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Total

- Takovo

14.1 %
2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

- La Vita

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

24.7

25.3

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

- Bip

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

- Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

Total

PDF Editor

0.1 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Navip

0.0

0.1 %

Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

- Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Others

6.3

7.2

7.3

6.4

7.2

25.3 %

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

- Other Private Label

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.4

0.8

1.8 %

3.1 %

3.4 %

1.5 %

2.5 %

- Others

5.8

6.5

6.4

6.1

6.4

23.5 %

25.5 %

24.6 %

23.2 %

21.7 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

- Pivovar

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

- Frutella

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

- Frubi

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Swisslion Miloduh

3.5

14.1 %

- Miloduh

3.5

14.1 %

Swisslion Takovo

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

- Takovo

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

- La Vita

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

Swisslion

3.5

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

14.1 %

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

Others

6.3

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

0.1 %
7.2

7.3

6.4

PDF Editor

7.2

25.3 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

24.7

25.3

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Swisslion Takovo
Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

0.1 %

Swisslion Miloduh

3.5

14.1 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Others

6.3

7.2

7.3

25.3 %

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

6.4

7.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Squash/Syrups

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

11.7

11.7

10.9

13.6

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

3.8

3.5

1.6

1.7

1.7

14.8 %

13.5 %

5.9 %

5.7 %

5.4 %

- Bottle

3.8

3.5

1.6

1.7

1.7

14.8 %

13.5 %

5.9 %

5.7 %

5.4 %

- 70cl

3.8

3.5

1.6

1.7

1.7

14.8 %

13.5 %

5.9 %

5.7 %

5.4 %

8.0

8.2

9.3

12.0

12.5

31.4 %

31.5 %

35.6 %

40.6 %

39.7 %

- Bottle

8.0

8.2

9.3

12.0

12.5

31.4 %

31.5 %

35.6 %

40.6 %

39.7 %

- 85cl

1.5

2.0

3.9

5.0

5.1

5.9 %

7.9 %

14.7 %

16.8 %

16.2 %

- 100cl

3.0

3.2

4.7

6.1

6.4

11.9 %

12.4 %

17.8 %

20.7 %

20.3 %

- 150cl

2.7

2.3

0.7

0.8

0.9

10.7 %

9.0 %

2.7 %

2.7 %

2.9 %

- 300cl

0.8

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.0 %

2.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Glass

- PET

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Refillable

13.6

14.3

15.3

15.9

17.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Glass

13.6

14.3

15.3

15.9

17.3

53.7 %

55.1 %

58.5 %

53.8 %

54.9 %

- Bottle

13.6

14.3

15.3

15.9

17.3

53.7 %

55.1 %

58.5 %

53.8 %

54.9 %

- 85cl

2.7

2.0

2.0

2.1

2.3

10.7 %

7.9 %

7.5 %

7.1 %

7.3 %

- 100cl

10.9

12.3

13.3

13.8

15.0

43.1 %

47.2 %

51.0 %

46.7 %

47.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

25.3

26.0

26.1

29.5

31.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

24.0

24.8

25.9

29.3

31.5

94.7 %

95.5 %

99.4 %

99.3 %

99.7 %

On-Premise

1.4

1.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

5.3 %

4.5 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Fruit Powders Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010......................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Fruit Powders Trademarks 2008-2010 .................................................................................................. 3
Functional Products ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Fruit Powders Trademark Owners and Local Operators .................................................................................... 4
Fruit Powders Selected Off-Premise Prices (Supermarket), 2009-2011 ............................................................ 5
Fruit Powders Selected On-Premise Prices , 2009-2011 ................................................................................... 5
Fruit Powders Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ............................................................................. 6
Fruit Powders Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ...................................................................... 6
Fruit Powders Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ...................................................................... 6
Fruit Powders Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ........................................................................................ 6
Fruit Powders All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ......................................................................................................... 7
Fruit Powders Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 .................................................................................................... 7
Fruit Powders All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................................. 8
Fruit Powders All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................... 8
Fruit Powders Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ..................................................................................... 9
Fruit Powders Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 .......................................................................................... 9
Fruit Powders Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ................................................. 9
Fruit Powders Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ............................................................................ 10

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

19.5

2.7

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

18.2 %

9.5 %

6.5 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

1,850.00

94.39

25.73

1.31

Orange

Others

69.5 %

30.5 %

Off-Premise

On-Premise

94.4 %

5.6 %

Foil

HDPE

PET

Other

53.6 %

42.0 %

4.4 %

0.0 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010
% Share
Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


The whole category grew by 7%, mostly driven by consumer perception that fruit powders is a healthy
category. Growth was led by Cedevita brand owner, Atlantic Grupa. Cedevita Go boasts a unique closure
system making it almost rtd, and whilst it was launched in 2009, it really began making progress in 2010.
Since Atlantic Grupa bought Multivita in 2007, this market has been dominated by one player, Atlantic Grupa.
As the category grew in both volumes and producers margins, there was growing desire from some regional
companies (Agrokor-Idea retail) to start own production, not related to Private Label.

Outlook
A 1% increase is expected in 2011. This growth could be higher, if some companies realised their wish to start
their own production.

Segmentation
Orange and lemon remained the most dominant, with a 94% market share. Other fruit recorded a 27% drop.
The low calorie segment recorded high volumes in the past years. A lack of demand resulted in less shelf
presence, especially in traditional trade and a poor performance in 2010.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Cedevita

Atlantic Grupa

13.3

14.3

14.3

Multivita (Atlantic Grupa)

Atlantic Grupa

3.1

2.9

4.1

Cevitana

Vitaminka

1.1

1.0

0.9

Frutti

Kendy

0.2

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Over 90% of the market was in the hands of two brands owned by one owner - Atlantic Grupa. Imported brand
Cevitana (Vitaminka) struggled as one of the only brands competing in the market that was not owned by
Atlantic Grupa.
This situation could change in the coming years, if Agrokor (Idea-Serbia and Konzum-Croatia) decide to enter
this highly profitable market.

Functional Products
Each Cedevita product included additional vitamins; Cedevita Kids brand has vitamins and calcium targeting
the young population and parents.

PDF Editor

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Currently, retail interest and Private Label volumes, including Vitamix (Mercator) PL are insignificant. Besides
the wider range of pack sizes (500gr and 1000gr foil sachet and 200gr HDPE tub) the turnover was minimal.
The volume of Private Label was too small to be included in this report however.

Marketing
Cedevita Go (Atlantic Grupa) was the most advertised product in 2010, in order to raise brand awareness and
to promote the unique closure solution. (When the cap is twisted, powder drops into the liquid in the bottle.)
Atlantic Grupa also paid more attention on branding Horeca outlets.

Pricing/Valuation
Prices increased, as followed by the currency depreciation. Atlantic Grupa, as market leader, raised its prices
twice, in April and in September, 2010. Convenience outlets made the highest price increases on account of it
24/7 opening times.

Packaging
Foil sachets were the most dominant pack type, with around 54% of the market. HDPE 200gr, followed with
500gr and 1,000gr sachet.

Distribution
Off-premise was the most dominant channel, recording 94% of the market, equally distributed in traditional,
large modern and convenience.
On-premise showed growth of 57%, from a small base, supported by Cedevita Go and the always popular
15gr foil sachet. This on-premise trend is expected to continue.

New Products 2010


No new products in 2010.

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Cedevita

Atlantic Grupa

Cedevita

Cevitana

Vitaminka

Vitaminka

Frutti

Kendy

Kendy

Multivita (Atlantic Grupa)

Atlantic Grupa

Multivita

SOURCE: Canadean

PDF Editor

PACK TYPE/SIZE (G)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

HDPE
TUB

200

CEDEVITA (CEDEVITA)

139.90

126.00

165.90

43.42

42.78

72.45

200

MULTIVITA (MULTIVITA)

112.90

111.22

143.90

53.81

48.46

62.84

NRPET

355

CEDEVITA GO

95.00

95.00

267.61

267.71

FOIL
SACHET

200

CEVITANA (VITAMINKA)

125.00

150.90

48.08

65.90

500

CEDEVITA (CEDEVITA)

310.90

352.62

385.90

47.83

54.25

59.37

500

CEVITANA (VITAMINKA)

268.90

290.00

343.90

41.37

44.62

52.91

500

MULTIVITA (MULTIVITA)

223.50

263.96

336.90

34.38

40.61

51.83

1000

CEDEVITA (CEDEVITA)

587.90

537.38

737.90

45.22

41.34

56.76

1000

CEVITANA (VITAMINKA)

439.16

424.98

625.90

33.78

32.69

48.15

1000

MULTIVITA (MULTIVITA)

488.90

478.92

617.90

37.61

36.84

47.53

SACHET

FRUTTI (KENDY)

11.10

12.80

16.99

5.55

6.40

8.50

STEP (KENDY)

15.20

17.90

24.90

7.60

8.95

12.45

PACK TYPE/SIZE (G)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

FOIL
SACHET

CEDEVITA (CEDEVITA)

120.00

600.00

SOURCE : Canadean

15

SOURCE : Canadean

PDF Editor

130.00

650.00

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Production

3.1

3.0

4.8

3.8

2.6

2.2

3.2

4.7

6.8

3.8

0.2

1.3

Imports

3.7

3.8

3.6

2.8

4.1

6.8

8.6

10.6

11.2

14.8

19.4

18.5

1.9

1.1

0.8

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

6.4

5.5

5.9

8.5

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

Exports
Consumption

6.8

6.7

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

10.6

11.2

14.8

19.4

18.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Croatia

9.3

9.9

13.7

18.4

18.4

88.0 %

88.2 %

93.0 %

94.6 %

99.1 %

Macedonia

1.0

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.1

9.6 %

11.7 %

7.0 %

5.1 %

0.5 %

Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.4 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Orange

9.9

11.7

12.5

13.6

13.8

66.9 %

66.1 %

68.1 %

69.5 %

69.7 %

Lemon

3.3

3.9

4.1

4.7

4.7

22.3 %

21.8 %

22.4 %

23.8 %

23.9 %

Other Fruit

1.5

2.1

1.7

1.2

1.2

10.1 %

11.6 %

9.2 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

Berries

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

Multivita (Atlantic Grupa)

2.3

2.8

3.1

2.9

4.1

20.4 %

18.7 %

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

Cevitana

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Frutti

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Top Power (Multivita)

0.2

0.3

1.8 %

1.7 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Total

0.0

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Orange

7.4

9.9

11.7

12.5

13.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Cedevita

5.6

7.5

9.2

9.4

9.6

75.7 %

75.9 %

78.1 %

75.2 %

70.8 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

1.5

1.8

2.0

1.9

2.9

19.5 %

17.6 %

17.1 %

15.1 %

21.3 %

- Cevitana

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.5

3.1 %

5.0 %

4.8 %

4.4 %

3.7 %

0.7

0.6

5.3 %

4.3 %

Total

- Cedevita GO
- Top Power (Multivita)

0.1

0.2

1.6 %

1.5 %

Total Lemon

2.3

3.3

3.9

4.1

4.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Cedevita

1.6

2.3

2.8

2.8

2.9

67.8 %

68.7 %

72.1 %

69.0 %

62.8 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.7

1.0

19.3 %

15.6 %

15.5 %

15.8 %

22.1 %

- Cevitana

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.4

9.4 %

12.6 %

12.4 %

11.4 %

9.2 %

0.2

0.3

3.7 %

5.8 %

- Cedevita GO
- Top Power (Multivita)

0.1

0.1

3.4 %

3.0 %

Total Other Fruit

1.5

1.5

2.1

1.7

1.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Cedevita

0.8

0.7

1.3

1.2

1.0

53.5 %

49.4 %

65.2 %

72.7 %

78.9 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.1

19.6 %

27.3 %

21.3 %

20.2 %

9.0 %

- Frutti

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

16.4 %

15.3 %

10.6 %

6.5 %

8.1 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.0 %

1.3 %

0.5 %

0.1 %

3.3 %

- Cevitana

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

8.5 %

6.7 %

2.4 %

0.6 %

0.7 %

Total Berries

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Atlantic Grupa

8.0

10.6

16.4

17.2

18.4

70.3 %

71.1 %

92.6 %

93.8 %

94.5 %

- Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

3.1

2.9

4.1

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

Total

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)
Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

- Frutti

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

22.1 %

20.4 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

2.3

2.8

20.4 %

18.7 %

- Top Power (Multivita)

0.2

0.3

1.8 %

1.7 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

- Cevitana

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

- Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

- Frutti

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

3.1

2.9

4.1

22.1 %

20.4 %

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

2.3

2.8

3.1

2.9

4.1

20.4 %

18.7 %

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

- Top Power (Multivita)

0.2

0.3

1.8 %

1.7 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

- Cevitana

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Atlantic Grupa

8.0

10.6

16.4

17.2

18.4

70.3 %

71.1 %

92.6 %

93.8 %

94.5 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

22.1 %

20.4 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Total

0.0

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

3.1

2.9

4.1

22.1 %

20.4 %

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Fruit Powders

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

19.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

2.7 %

3.4 %

3.2 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Tub

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.0

0.0

2.7 %

3.4 %

3.2 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 400g

0.3

0.5

0.5

0.0

0.0

2.0 %

2.8 %

2.6 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 1000g

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

13.4

16.0

15.3

10.5

10.6

89.9 %

89.9 %

83.6 %

53.6 %

53.4 %

13.4

16.0

15.3

10.5

10.6

89.9 %

89.9 %

83.6 %

53.6 %

53.4 %

- 5g

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0

1.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- 7g

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- 10g

1.0

0.9

4.9 %

4.6 %

- 15g

0.7

0.8

3.6 %

4.0 %

- Foil
- Sachet

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

- 200g

4.1

4.6

4.9

0.0

- 430g

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- 500g

4.3

5.5

5.3

4.8

4.8

28.9 %

30.8 %

28.9 %

24.5 %

24.2 %

- 1000g

4.5

5.4

4.7

3.8

3.9

30.4 %

30.6 %

25.8 %

19.7 %

19.7 %

- HDPE

1.1

1.2

1.4

8.2

8.3

7.4 %

6.7 %

7.6 %

42.0 %

41.8 %

- Tub

1.1

1.2

1.4

8.2

8.3

7.4 %

6.7 %

7.6 %

42.0 %

41.8 %

- 180g

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.3 %

1.1 %

1.3 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

- 200g

0.9

1.0

1.2

8.1

8.2

6.1 %

5.6 %

6.3 %

41.5 %

41.3 %

1.0

0.9

1.0

5.6 %

4.4 %

4.8 %

- Bottle

1.0

0.9

1.0

5.6 %

4.4 %

4.8 %

- 355g

1.0

0.9

1.0

5.6 %

4.4 %

4.8 %

- PET

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.6 %

25.9 %

26.5 %

0.0 %

2011F

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.6

19.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

14.7

17.2

17.6

18.5

18.6

98.7 %

96.9 %

96.2 %

94.4 %

94.1 %

On-Premise

0.2

0.6

0.7

1.1

1.2

1.3 %

3.1 %

3.8 %

5.6 %

5.9 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ............................................. 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Trademarks 2008-2010 ...................................................................................... 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks New Products 2010 .......................................................................................................... 5
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks New Products Photo Shots 2010 ..................................................................................... 5
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Trademark Owners and Local Operators ......................................................................... 5
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ........................................................................... 6
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ........................................................................... 6
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F .................................................................. 7
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ........................................................... 7
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ........................................................... 7
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F .......................................................................... 7
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ............................................................................. 8
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks All Trademarks, 2006-2010 .............................................................................................. 8
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Brands by Segment, 2006-2010....................................................................................... 9
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Private Label Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 ................................................................ 9
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Brands by Flavour, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................... 10
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................ 11
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks All Local Operators, 2006-2010...................................................................................... 12
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ....................................................................... 13
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................. 14
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .................................... 15
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ................................................................ 16

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

18.9

2.6

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

26.9 %

38.8 %

29.1 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

2,859.55

151.48

39.77

2.11

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010

RTD

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

Off-Premise

On-Premise

84.6 %

15.4 %

PET

Board

Glass

Other

85.4 %

11.7 %

1.5 %

1.4 %

% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


Iced/rtd tea drinks grew by 29% in 2010. The absolute leader was Nestea, with 52%, reflecting a 46% growth
in 2010. Growth of the category was driven by the perception that it is a healthier option than to JNSD, due to
the strong positioning in large modern retail (next to the fresh fruit segment and organic shelves) and branding
in the most popular Horeca destinations.
As a result of Rauch changing its distributor, from Nelt (P&G) to MD International (current Henkel distributor),
some time was lost due to the consolidation.

Outlook
4% growth is expected in 2011. Besides the slow economic recovery, still drinks will gain back some shares
from the iced/rtd tea drinks. It is unlikely that iced/rtd tea drinks will develop at such an impressive rate as the
category has already grown considerably.

Segmentation
Peach was the most popular flavour, holding a 62% share. Nestea peach drove growth in this segment, and
carried the segment forward despite losses made by Lipton, Rauch and Jamnica.
The second most popular flavour was Lemon, which made a small gain in 2010.
The best performing flavour in 2010 was forest fruits, which tripled its 2009 volumes, driven by Nestea and
Jamnica. Heavily supported by outdoor and trade marketing activity, this growth would be hard to repeat
again.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Nestea

Nestle

2.3

6.7

9.9

Jamnica

Agrokor

1.4

1.8

2.8

Rauch

Rauch

1.8

1.9

1.7

Nectar

Nectar

1.9

1.3

1.4

Hello

Fruvita

1.0

1.2

1.0

Golf

Knjaz Milos

0.7

0.4

0.4

Lipton

Unilever

0.4

0.4

Frutella

Rodic

0.2

0.5

0.4

La Vita

Vino Zupa

0.1

0.1

0.2

Pfanner

Pfanner

0.2

0.2

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Nestea recorded 46% growth in 2010. This was partly due to the positioning of their coolers, among the health
products in stores. Billboards and point of sale also drove development.
Jamnica grew by 56%, from a small base.
After changing its distribution partner, Rauch lost time and volume due to further consolidation which drove the
decline of its brand.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Most retailers had their own iced/rtd tea drinks brand. However, Private Label lines did not hold a large share,
accounting for less than 1% of the total market, with only Mercator present.
Branded products will remain popular in this market as the market perception is of a premium category. With
this in mind, consumers prefer to purchase branded products rather than products that are perceived to be
less good.

Marketing
Nestea and Rauch employ out-of-home marketing techniques as seen by their use of billboards. Billboard
campaigns strengthened category awareness. Also, in-store visibility and trade promotions supported the
brands growth.

Pricing/Valuation
Prices slowly increased and followed the currency depreciation.

Packaging
PET was the most dominant, with an 85% share and increased by an impressive 36% in 2010. Carton also
performed well, growing by 13% while glass struggled to keep up with the more modern pack materials.

Distribution
Off-premise increased by 32%. All retail formats grew with the highest growth seen in Convenience outlets in
2010, although Large Modern Retail still holds the lions share of the market at 38% overall share.

PDF Editor

New Products 2010

Nestea

Flavour(s)
Fruits of the
forest
Lemon, peach

Pack
Type/Size
50cl PET
150cl PET
20cl nr glass

Price
RSD49.99
RSD99.99
RSD168.00

Verde

Peach, lemon

150cl carton

RSD83.90

Company
Coca-Cola/Nestl

Brand
Nestea

Coca-Cola/Nestl
IB Tim

Comment
New flavour
New pack type, available in
on-premise
(See Figure 1)

Source : Canadean

Figure 1: Verde
Source : Canadean

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Fructal

Pivovarna Lasko

Fructal

Frutella

Rodic

Rodic

Golf

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Hello

Fruvita

Fruvita

Jamnica

Agrokor

Jamnica

La Vita

Vino Zupa

Vino Zupa

Lipton

Unilever

A&P

Mercator

Mercator

Others

Nectar

Nectar

Nectar

Nestea

Nestle

CCHBC

Pfanner

Pfanner

Pfanner

Rauch

Rauch

Rauch

Sola

Pivovarna Lasko

Pivovarna Union

SOURCE: Canadean

PDF Editor

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

33

FRUTELA

17.40

19.58

52.73

50

FRUVITA

36.13

38.49

72.26

76.98

50

JAMNICA

48.36

57.90

96.72

115.80

50

LA VITA

25.95

34.58

51.90

69.16

50

LIPTON (PEPSI)

53.00

64.90

106.00

129.80

50

NESTEA

56.90

49.99

51.90

113.80

99.98

103.80

50

RAUCH

42.90

44.99

48.90

85.80

89.98

97.80

50

SOLA

49.71

58.39

99.42

116.78

70

FRUTELA (RODIC)

26.79

29.49

38.27

42.13

150

FRUVITA

64.79

73.58

43.19

49.05

150

JAMNICA

67.58

92.90

45.05

61.93

150

LA VITA

52.00

79.90

34.67

53.27

150

LIPTON (PEPSI)

95.00

115.90

63.33

77.27

150

NESTEA

99.99

105.90

66.66

70.60

150

RAUCH

86.99

92.90

57.99

61.93

150

SOLA

91.84

98.99

61.23

65.99

200

FRUTELA (RODIC)

55.34

58.39

27.67

29.20

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NRPET

CAN

33

CARTON

59.33

SOLA (UNION, SLOVENIA)

48.32

52.89

56.59

146.42

160.27

171.48

100

NECTAR

44.90

54.78

61.90

44.90

54.78

61.90

100

RAUCH

94.99

102.00

94.99

102.00

150

NECTAR

88.90

89.99

97.99

59.27

59.99

65.33

200

RAUCH

163.90

168.99

169.58

81.95

84.50

84.79

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NR
GLASS

25

NESTEA

150.00

168.00

180.00

600.00

672.00

720.00

NR PET

50
50

JAMNICA
NESTEA

150.00
170.00

150.00
170.00

160.00
175.00

300.00

300.00

320.00

340.00

340.00

350.00

50

RAUCH

150.00

150.00

160.00

300.00

300.00

320.00

SOURCE : Canadean

PDF Editor

Production

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

1.7

1.3

0.6

3.1

4.1

5.0

6.4

6.0

9.2

13.6

16.5

17.3

0.1

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.4

1.0

1.9

1.9

2.2

3.6

3.8

Imports
Exports

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.7

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

1.2

1.2

1.4

Consumption

1.5

1.1

1.0

3.6

4.2

5.8

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

1.9

1.9

2.2

3.6

3.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Croatia

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.7

2.7

37.0 %

72.2 %

82.2 %

73.7 %

72.0 %

Austria

0.8

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

42.7 %

11.5 %

8.2 %

3.4 %

3.2 %

Slovenia

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

9.6 %

11.0 %

9.6 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Others

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.8

0.9

10.7 %

5.2 %

0.0 %

22.1 %

24.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.9

1.0

1.2

1.2

1.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.9

1.0

1.2

1.2

1.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Peach

5.4

7.3

10.3

11.6

11.4

76.5 %

72.2 %

70.3 %

61.5 %

58.1 %

Flavour Mixes

0.4

0.8

0.9

3.6

4.1

5.2 %

7.9 %

6.1 %

19.2 %

20.8 %

Lemon

0.8

1.4

3.3

3.4

3.9

11.5 %

14.4 %

22.4 %

18.0 %

19.9 %

Tea

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.4 %

0.0 %

0.7 %

1.1 %

1.1 %

Orange

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Lemon-Lime

0.4

0.5

0.0

0.0

5.1 %

4.8 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Other Fruit

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.8 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

Nestea
Jamnica
Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Hello

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Golf
Lipton
Frutella

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Sola

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Apa

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Ritam
Frupi

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Others

0.3

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

0.6

3.7 %

3.1 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Iced/RTD
Drinks

Tea

- Nestea
- Jamnica

2.3

6.7

9.9

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

- Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

- Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

- Hello

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

- Others

0.3

0.6

3.7 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

- Golf
- Lipton

3.1 %

- Frutella

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

- La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

- Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

- Sola

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

- Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Apa

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Ritam
- Frupi

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Iced/RTD Tea


Drinks

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mercator

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Peach

5.4

5.4

7.3

10.3

11.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

1.5

4.0

5.9

20.8 %

39.3 %

50.5 %

- Nestea
- Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.3

17.0 %

23.0 %

24.4 %

18.0 %

10.8 %

- Nectar

1.1

1.5

1.6

1.1

1.2

20.7 %

27.8 %

22.0 %

10.7 %

10.2 %

- Hello

0.4

0.5

0.5

1.0

0.8

6.5 %

8.5 %

7.3 %

9.8 %

7.0 %

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.7

6.9 %

8.5 %

7.6 %

6.3 %

0.5

0.2

0.5

0.4

9.3 %

2.8 %

4.4 %

3.3 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.4

5.6 %

4.5 %

3.5 %

3.4 %

- Jamnica
- Frutella

0.7

- Golf
- Others

0.2

- La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

- Pfanner

0.3

0.3

- Sola

0.1

0.1

13.0 %

0.4

2.8 %

0.1

0.2

0.7 %

1.9 %

1.7 %

1.2 %

1.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

5.2 %

5.6 %

3.0 %

1.7 %

0.9 %

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.5 %

1.9 %

2.8 %

1.7 %

0.9 %

0.2

0.1

1.7 %

1.2 %

- Lipton

3.8 %

- Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.6 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

- Apa

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

30.6 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

0.9 %

3.9 %

0.1 %

Total Flavour Mixes

0.1

0.4

0.8

0.9

3.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.3

0.8

0.9

1.9

86.4 %

95.0 %

96.6 %

51.1 %

- Jamnica
- Nestea

1.8

48.9 %

- Frutella

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

13.6 %

5.0 %

3.4 %

0.0 %

Total Lemon

0.8

0.8

1.4

3.3

3.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.7

2.7

2.2

51.6 %

82.1 %

64.5 %

0.3

0.2

0.2

20.0 %

4.6 %

4.7 %

- Nestea
- Nectar

0.7

0.5

- Rauch

86.1 %

56.8 %

0.4

- Jamnica

0.1

- Others

0.1

11.8 %

0.2
0.2

3.8 %
11.9 %

5.1 %
4.4 %

- Hello

0.2

0.1

4.8 %

4.1 %

- Lipton

0.1

0.1

3.2 %

2.6 %

0.1

0.0

1.5 %

1.2 %

- Golf

0.4

0.4

- La Vita

43.2 %

28.3 %

0.1

1.5 %

- Next

0.0

2.0 %

Total Lemon-Lime

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Hello

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total Orange

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7 %

25.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Frutella

0.1

0.0

83.3 %

75.0 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Total Tea

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.1

0.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Lipton
- Next

0.0

0.0

0.0

Total Other Fruit

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

- Ritam
- Frupi

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

66.7 %

80.0 %

100.0 %

0.0 %

33.3 %

20.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A-BInBev

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Apa

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Total

Agroekonomik

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Ritam

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Agrokor

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

- Jamnica

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

Coca-Cola

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

- Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Frupi

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

- Hello

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

InBev

1.7

0.3

0.1

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

- Apa

1.7

0.3

0.1

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

Knjaz Milos

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

- Golf

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

- Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Nestle

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

- Nestea

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

Others

0.3

PDF Editor

0.6

3.7 %

3.1 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

% Share
2009

2010

2006

0.6

3.7 %

2007

2008

2009

2010

- Others

0.3

3.1 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

- Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Pivovarna Lasko

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

2.1 %

2.1 %

2.4 %

1.4 %

0.7 %

- Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Sola

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

- Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

- Frutella

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Unilever

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

- Lipton

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

- La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

- Lipton

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Total

Agroekonomik

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Ritam

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Apatinska Pivara

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Apa

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

CCHBC

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

- Nestea

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

Fresh & Co

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

- Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Frupi

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

- Hello

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

Jamnica

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

- Jamnica

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

Knjaz Milos

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

- Golf

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

- Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6

3.9 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

3.3 %

- Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Others

0.3

0.6

3.7 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

- Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Pivovarna Union

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

- Sola

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

- Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

- Frutella

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

- La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

3.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

Nestle
Agrokor
Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Knjaz Milos
Unilever

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

Pivovarna Lasko

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

2.1 %

2.1 %

2.4 %

1.4 %

0.7 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.0 %

A-BInBev
Agroekonomik

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

InBev

1.7

0.3

0.1

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

Coca-Cola

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Others

0.3

0.6

3.7 %

3.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

CCHBC
Jamnica
Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Knjaz Milos
A&P
Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Pivovarna Union

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Apatinska Pivara

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Agroekonomik
Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Fresh & Co

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Others

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6

3.9 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

3.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Iced/RTD Tea


Drinks

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

1.4

2.3

2.0

2.2

2.2

20.1 %

22.4 %

13.3 %

11.7 %

11.3 %

- Carton

1.4

2.3

2.0

2.2

2.2

20.1 %

22.4 %

13.3 %

11.7 %

11.3 %

- 33cl

0.1

0.1

1.0 %

1.0 %

- 100cl

0.7

0.9

0.9

0.6

0.4

9.4 %

9.2 %

5.8 %

2.9 %

2.1 %

- 150cl

0.3

0.6

0.5

1.2

1.2

4.2 %

5.6 %

3.4 %

6.1 %

6.3 %

- 200cl

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.6

5.6 %

6.6 %

4.1 %

2.7 %

2.8 %

0.1

0.6

0.7

0.3

0.3

2.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

1.5 %

1.6 %

- Bottle

0.1

0.6

0.7

0.3

0.3

2.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

1.5 %

1.6 %

- 20cl

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- 25cl

0.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.3

1.4 %

4.6 %

4.1 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

- Metal

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.5 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

- Can

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.5 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

- 33cl

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.7 %

1.0 %

0.5 %

1.4 %

1.5 %

- Glass

- PET

5.4

7.1

11.9

16.1

16.9

77.1 %

70.9 %

81.4 %

85.4 %

85.7 %

- Bottle

5.4

7.1

11.9

16.1

16.9

77.1 %

70.9 %

81.4 %

85.4 %

85.7 %

- 33cl

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

1.4 %

1.0 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

- 50cl

1.5

2.2

3.8

5.5

6.0

21.6 %

21.4 %

25.6 %

29.2 %

30.2 %

- 70cl

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.1 %

- 150cl

0.9

1.6

4.8

8.7

8.8

13.2 %

15.8 %

33.1 %

45.8 %

44.7 %

- 200cl

2.8

3.2

3.2

1.8

2.0

40.2 %

32.1 %

21.9 %

9.7 %

9.9 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

19.7

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

5.5

8.0

12.1

16.0

16.6

78.4 %

79.6 %

82.9 %

84.6 %

84.2 %

On-Premise

1.5

2.1

2.5

2.9

3.1

21.6 %

20.4 %

17.1 %

15.4 %

15.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ......................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Trademarks 2008-2010 .................................................................................. 3
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 3
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 3
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 3
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Trademark Owners and Local Operators .................................................................... 4
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ...................................................................... 4
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2005-2011F.............................................................. 4
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F....................................................... 5
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F ...................................................................... 5
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks All Trademarks, 2006-2010.......................................................................................... 5
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 .................................................................................. 5
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................. 6
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................... 6
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ..................................................................... 6
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 .......................................................................... 6
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ................................. 7
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F .............................................................. 7

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

0.1

0.0

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

8.0 %

-4.2 %

10.0 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

58.12

660.45

0.81

9.19

Metal

PET

Board

50.0 %

37.5 %

12.5 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010

RTD

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

Off-Premise

% Share

100.0 %

Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


The total category increased by 10%, from a small base. There were very few imported brands, only the likes
of Rauch Caffemio and- Xpress. Consumers prefer hot coffee and were still not attracted to the idea of the
cold alternative, a decision that is unlikely to change.

Outlook
2011 will see 13% growth, as Rauch and Nestl decided to invest small funds in this product range.

Segmentation
Cappuccino was the most dominant flavour with 35% share. Nestl had a wider flavour range, but also
focussed less on these products in terms of distribution as it is a small category with question marks over its
potential.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Cafemio

Rauch

2008

2009

2010

0.1

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Cafemio, from Rauch, was the leader. There were no plans for new product/brands launches in the near
future.

Marketing
No marketing activity.

Pricing/Valuation
Nestl range was 10% more expensive than Rauch. However, the pricing was not a major concern for
consumers as it is a high end category.

Packaging
25cl was almost the sole pack size, while in terms of pack type there is can, followed by PET.

PDF Editor

Distribution
Iced/rtd coffee drinks were only present in large modern and convenience stores and only in urban, big cities.

New Products 2010


No new products in 2010.

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Cafemio

Rauch

Rauch

SOURCE: Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PET

25

CAFMIO (RAUCH)

137.64

145.20

148.90

550.56

580.80

595.60

CAN

25

K-FEE (K-FEE AG)

135.28

141.30

146.58

541.12

565.20

586.32

SOURCE : Canadean

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Imports

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Consumption

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Austria

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

35.4 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

64.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cafemio

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Iced/RTD Coffee


Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

- Cafemio

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

- Cafemio

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

- Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

- Cafemio

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean


Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Iced/RTD Coffee


Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

18.7 %

12.5 %

12.5 %

13.1 %

- Carton

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

18.7 %

12.5 %

12.5 %

13.1 %

- 100cl

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

18.7 %

12.5 %

12.5 %

13.1 %

- Metal

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

25.2 %

53.8 %

50.0 %

48.5 %

- Can

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

25.2 %

53.8 %

50.0 %

48.5 %

- 25cl

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0 %

25.2 %

53.8 %

50.0 %

48.5 %

- PET

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0 %

56.1 %

33.8 %

37.5 %

38.4 %

- Bottle

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0 %

56.1 %

33.8 %

37.5 %

38.4 %

- 25cl

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0 %

56.1 %

33.8 %

37.5 %

38.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

Chart - Sports Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ......................................................... 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Sports Drinks Trademarks 2008-2010 .................................................................................................. 3
Functional Products ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Sports Drinks New Products 2010 ...................................................................................................................... 4
Sports Drinks New Products Photo Shots 2010 ................................................................................................. 5
Sports Drinks Trademark Owners and Local Operators ..................................................................................... 5
Sports Drinks Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ..................................................................................... 5
Sports Drinks Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 ..................................................................................... 6
Sports Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2001-2011F .............................................................................. 6
Sports Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ....................................................................... 6
Sports Drinks Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F....................................................................................... 6
Sports Drinks Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ......................................................................................... 7
Sports Drinks All Trademarks, 2006-2010 .......................................................................................................... 7
Sports Drinks Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................... 7
Sports Drinks All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................................. 8
Sports Drinks All Local Operators, 2006-2010 .................................................................................................... 8
Sports Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010...................................................................................... 9
Sports Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................... 9
Sports Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F .................................................. 9
Sports Drinks Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ............................................................................ 10

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

1.1

0.2

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

13.2 %

32.9 %

47.3 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

323.65

263.13

4.50

3.66

RTD

Not RTD

99.6 %

0.4 %

On-Premise

Off-Premise

50.4 %

49.6 %

PET

Board

99.8 %

0.2 %

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010
% Share
Distribution 2010
% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


The whole category increased by 47%; impressive gains but it is important to note to that it was from a small
base.
Knjaz Milos brands Aqua Viva Hydroactive and new Aqua Viva Recharge led the category and were helped by
the fact that they were much cheaper than imported multinational brands.
While its functionality appealed to consumers, taste also played a role in attracting non-sports consumers
also.

Outlook
The category is expected to see 18% growth in 2011, driven by a high level of brand presence, new channels
and educational trade campaigns.

Segmentation
Peach was the most dominant flavour, with a 44% share of the market. Growth of this flavour was driven by
Aqua Viva Hydroactive (Knjaz Milos), accounting for 62% of the market despite only being launched in 2009. It
performed well thanks to strong marketing activity and, more importantly, a good taste.
Lemon followed behind, with a market share of 27%. The brand ProSport Isotonic (Agrokor) held 23% of this
segment, despite decreasing in 2010. A sharper drop was prevented by Gatorade Lemon.
Gatorade was the stand out brand in the category, growing by over 250% in 2010 but from a very small base.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Aqua Viva

Knjaz Milos

Gatorade

PepsiCo

ProSport

Agrokor

Multi Sola
Sinalco

2008

2009

2010

0.5

0.7

0.6

0.1

0.3

0.0

0.1

0.1

Pivovarna Lasko

0.0

0.0

0.0

Sinalco

0.0

0.1

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Sports drinks were firmly in the hands of three players who held 96% of the market. Aqua Viva, with trademark
brands Hydroactive and Recharge, held 62% of the market share and grew by 4%.
Gatorade (distributed by A&P-Pepsi bottler) showed impressive growth, now having a 27% share.
ProSport Isotonic (owned by Agrokor and distributed by Jamnica) has a lot of potential and is very well
positioned thanks to support from Agrokors retail outlet, Idea.

PDF Editor

Functional Products
All drinks have additional vitamins; Hydro Active had vitamin B complex, providing fast rehydration. Recharge
included electrolytes, claiming to improve rehydration and physical endurance of the body.

Marketing
The only marketing investments came from Knjaz Milos, whose focus was not solely on the sports market.
Gatorade did not have any local marketing activity, but it did benefit from its global brand recognition and
international marketing activity.

Pricing/Valuation
There was a strict line between the imported multinational brand Gatorade and the local brands. Gatorade
was almost twice as expensive as Akva Viva and Pro Sport.

Packaging
NrPET was the exclusive packaging material, accounting for more than 99% of total market. As cheaper local
brands were packed in 75cl PET, the volumes were almost three times higher than 50cl PET, where Gatorade
dominated.

Distribution
On-premise had 50% of the market and was mostly centred around the large modern retail outlets. With better
penetration, new channels such as modern wellness spa centres and sport facilities remained the key
obstacle for category awareness.
Sports facilities are growing in Serbia but the producers have not yet taken advantage of this. Gatorade might
be more suited, as a premium product, in gyms and health clubs, but it is currently only present in retail
outlets.

New Products 2010

Company
Knjaz Milos

Brand
Aqua Viva
Recharge

Flavour(s)
Red orange

Source : Canadean

PDF Editor

Pack
Type/Size
75cl PET

Price
RSD66.90

Comment
New flavour extension to this
flavoured sweetened,
functional water (See Figure
1)

Figure 1: Knjaz Milos Aqua Viva


Recharge
Source : Canadean

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Aqua Viva

Knjaz Milos

A&P

Gatorade

PepsiCo

A&P

Multi Sola

Pivovarna Lasko

Pivovarna Union

ProSport

Agrokor

Jamnica

SOURCE: Canadean

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

50

AQUA VIVA (KNJAZ MILOS)

78.50

157.00

50

GATORADE (PEPSICO)

50

MULTISOLA (PIVOVARNA UNION)

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NRPET

SOURCE : Canadean

PDF Editor

111.90

110.50

128.90

223.80

221.00

257.80

67.28

67.28

72.99

134.56

134.56

145.98

PACK
TYPE/SIZE
(CL)
NRPET

50

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

GATORADE (PEPSICO)

142.00

165.00

284.00

330.00

SOURCE : Canadean

Production

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.1

0.1

0.8

0.8

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.7

0.9

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.5

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

Imports
Consumption

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Powder

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

- RTD

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

99.4 %

99.8 %

99.6 %

99.6 %

99.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.5

0.6

58.3 %

43.5 %

41.0 %

Peach
Orange

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.4

0.5

44.2 %

48.0 %

12.6 %

33.5 %

39.2 %

Lemon

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.3

55.8 %

50.2 %

23.7 %

23.0 %

19.8 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.8 %

5.4 %

0.0 %

Other Fruit
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

0.6

0.1

0.3

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Aqua Viva
Gatorade

0.1

0.4

ProSport
Multi Sola

0.0

0.1

Sinalco
Others

% Share

0.3

0.0

29.2 %

6.8 %

63.9 %

89.0 %

10.3 %

0.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Sports Drinks

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Still

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

0.2

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

45.2 %

99.4 %

99.8 %

99.6 %

99.6 %

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

0.6

0.1

0.3

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

- Aqua Viva
- Gatorade

0.1

0.4

- ProSport
- Multi Sola

0.0

0.1

- Sinalco

29.2 %
6.8 %

89.0 %
10.3 %

- Others

0.0

9.1 %

- Powder

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

54.8 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Others

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

54.8 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Agrokor

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

- ProSport

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

- Aqua Viva

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

Total

Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

63.9 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

63.9 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

PepsiCo

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.1

0.3

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

- Gatorade

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.1

0.3

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

Pivovarna Lasko

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.8 %

10.3 %

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

- Multi Sola

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.8 %

10.3 %

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

Sinalco

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

- Sinalco

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.5

1.0

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

69.4 %

88.7 %

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

0.6

0.1

0.3

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

Jamnica

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

- ProSport

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

- Aqua Viva
- Gatorade

0.1

0.4

29.2 %

89.0 %

Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

63.9 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

63.9 %

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Pivovarna Union

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.8 %

10.3 %

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

- Multi Sola

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.8 %

10.3 %

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

- Sinalco

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Total

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

0.6

0.1

0.3

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Knjaz Milos
PepsiCo

0.1

0.4

Agrokor
Pivovarna Lasko

0.0

0.1

Sinalco
Others

% Share

0.3

0.0

29.2 %

6.8 %

63.9 %

89.0 %

10.3 %

0.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.5

1.0

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

69.4 %

88.7 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Jamnica
Pivovarna Union

0.0

0.1

Si & Si (Sinalco)
Others

0.3

0.0

6.8 %

63.9 %

10.3 %

0.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Sports Drinks

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Board

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Tub

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- 400g

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.2 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

- PET

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

99.4 %

99.8 %

100.0 %

99.8 %

99.9 %

- Bottle

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

1.3

99.4 %

99.8 %

100.0 %

99.8 %

99.9 %

- 50cl

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.3

0.4

99.4 %

97.9 %

28.6 %

27.3 %

26.8 %

0.0

0.5

0.8

1.0

2.0 %

71.4 %

72.6 %

73.1 %

- 75cl
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.5

0.7

0.7

1.2

1.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.7

27.7 %

43.9 %

48.0 %

49.6 %

49.3 %

On-Premise

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.7

72.3 %

56.1 %

52.0 %

50.4 %

50.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Chart - Energy Drinks Leading Trademark Owners & Private Label, 2010 ........................................................ 2
Current and Emerging Trends ............................................................................................................................. 3
Outlook ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Segmentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Brand/Companies................................................................................................................................................ 3
Leading Energy Drinks Trademarks 2008-2010 ................................................................................................. 3
Private Label/Private Label Producers ................................................................................................................ 4
Marketing ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Pricing/Valuation ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Packaging ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................... 4
New Products 2010 ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Energy Drinks New Products 2010 ..................................................................................................................... 5
Energy Drinks New Products Photo Shots 2010 ................................................................................................ 5
Energy Drinks Trademark Owners and Local Operators .................................................................................... 5
Energy Drinks Selected Off-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .................................................................................... 6
Energy Drinks Selected On-Premise Prices, 2009-2011 .................................................................................... 6
Energy Drinks Production/Trade/Consumption, 2000-2011F ............................................................................. 6
Energy Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Imports), 2007-2011F ...................................................................... 7
Energy Drinks Foreign Trade By Country (Exports), 2007-2011F ...................................................................... 7
Energy Drinks Consumption by Segment, 2007-2011F...................................................................................... 7
Energy Drinks Consumption by Flavour, 2007-2011F ........................................................................................ 7
Energy Drinks All Trademarks, 2006-2010 ......................................................................................................... 8
Energy Drinks Brands by Segment, 2006-2010 .................................................................................................. 8
Energy Drinks Private Label Brands by Segment, 2009-2010 ........................................................................... 9
Energy Drinks All Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................. 9
Energy Drinks All Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................. 10
Energy Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010................................................................................... 10
Energy Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 11
Energy Drinks Consumption by Pack Mix: Refillability/Pack/Size, 2007-2011F ............................................... 11
Energy Drinks Distribution: On vs Off Premise, 2007-2011F ........................................................................... 12

PDF Editor

Market Size

Million Litres

Litres Per
Capita

13.2

1.8

CAGR% 05-10

CAGR% 07-10

CAGR% 09-10

13.2 %

6.9 %

6.8 %

RSD Million

RSD / Litre

US$ Million

US$ / Litre

6,441.18

491.69

89.59

6.84

Consumption 2010
Growth
Consumption M Litres
Market Value
Value (at consumer price)
Segmentation 2010

RTD

% Share

100.0 %

Distribution 2010

On-Premise

Off-Premise

61.3 %

38.7 %

Metal

Glass

PET

93.6 %

4.7 %

1.7 %

% Share
Packaging 2010
% Share
SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

SOURCE: Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Current and Emerging Trends


There were two winners in the category in 2010. Ultra Energy (Coca-Cola) and Red Bull.
Unlike in other countries, energy drinks do not have a premium image in Serbia. Prices are lower than those
seen elsewhere and Red Bull had a small presence in the market. As a result local brands perform well, as
seen by the popularity of Guarana (Knjaz Milos).

Outlook
The category is expected to grow by 8% in 2011 and is anticipated to be driven by on-premise sales and new
products. Ultra Energy benefits as it is supported by its brand owner, Coca-Cola, who have a wide range of
resources available to them to help drive growth.

Segmentation
72% of all energy drinks were non-fruit flavoured, though share fell marginally on account of new fruit flavour
mixes. In particular fruit punch, from Ultra Energy recorded double digit growth due to the popularity of this
brand and its support from brand owner Coca-Cola.
Besides Red Bull, low calorie is planned to be phased out. There will also be no sugar free products in the
future as energy drinks are not consumed for their health benefits but rather to fit a purpose.

Brand/Companies

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

2008

2009

2010

Guarana

Knjaz Milos

8.3

7.9

7.3

Ultra

Coca-Cola

1.0

2.0

Energis

Sinalco

1.6

1.6

1.7

Red Bull

Red Bull Trading

1.6

1.3

1.5

Booster

Nectar

0.2

0.2

0.2

Battery

Carlsberg Group

0.2

0.2

0.2

Burn

Coca-Cola

0.2

0.1

0.1

Pink Up

Nectar

0.1

0.0

0.0

Fast Energy

Parksystem

0.0

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

Guarana (Knjaz Milos) was the leading brand with a 56% share. Its fall could not be prevented by Guarana
Mojito which gained a 6% share after a late 2010 launch.
Ultra Energy (Coca-Cola) took the second position from Red Bull and had a 16% share of the market.
Due to the technical problems in production, Fast brand was temporarily put on hold, which left a gap for other
low priced brands.

PDF Editor

Pink Up, by Nectar, was delisted.

Private Label/Private Label Producers


Private Label lines were underdeveloped. Even Mercators own brand had very poor sales. Serbians are
attracted to branded products and are still willing to pay the premium.

Marketing
While Red Bull (very few media buying campaigns) was mainly focused on Horeca and special event
marketing, Guarana and Ultra Energy combined that with strong above the line strategies.

Pricing/Valuation
Prices in the category increased by less than 5% on average. This was due to the devaluation of the currency
as well the high price of raw materials.

Packaging
94% of the market was in metal can, this reflects growth of 13% in 2010. Since Energis (from Sinalco) delisted
glass, glass volume halved.
PET is likely to grow in coming years as it is a low cost pack type.
Larger sizes were available for a highly affordable price from Bahus, through its brand Excess (100cl PET).

Distribution
On-premise sales increased by 1%. Ultra Energy used all the synergy with other TCCC categories in Horeca
outlets. This was positively reflected in modern retail and petrol stations, too.
Besides premium Horeca outlets, modern petrol stations on the main highway remained an important volume
generator for Red Bull as it was a popular drink amongst motorists, particularly lorry drivers.

PDF Editor

New Products 2010

Company
Knjaz Milos
Rubin

Brand
Guarana
Zum Zum
(Zoom
Zoom)

Flavour(s)
Guarana/mojito
Orange/lime

Pack
Type/Size
25cl can
25cl can

Price
RSD58.99
RSD49.99

Comment
New flavour (see Figure 1)
New energy drink from Rubin.
Zum Zum replaces Fast
brand. New formula for same
flavour (See Figure 2)

Source : Canadean

Figure 2 : Zum Zum (Zoom


Zoom)

Figure 1: Knjaz Milos Guarana Mojito


Source : Canadean

Trademark

Ultimate Owner

Local Operator

Battery

Carlsberg Group

Carlsberg Serbia

Booster

Nectar

Nectar

Burn

Coca-Cola

CCHBC

Energis

Sinalco

Si & Si (Sinalco)

Fast Energy

Parksystem

Pivara Vrsac

Guarana

Knjaz Milos

Knjaz Milos

Pink Up

Nectar

Nectar

Red Bull

Red Bull Trading

Others

Red Bull

Red Bull Trading

Red Bull Trading

Ultra

Coca-Cola

CCHBC

SOURCE: Canadean

PDF Editor

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

60.90

184.55

NRPET

33

ENERGIS (SI & SI)

61.36

67.90

CAN

25

BATTERY

123.00

134.90

25

BOOSTER (NECTAR)

25

BURN

52.50

46.39

54.90

111.90

64.68

98.90

25

FAST ENERGY (VRSAC)

52.23

25

GUARANA (KNJAZ MILOS)

57.90

58.99

65.00

25

MERCATOR

25

RED BULL (AUSTRIA)

59.00

61.00

99.00

134.99

154.90

185.94

205.76

492.00

539.60

210.00

185.56

219.60

447.60

258.72

395.60

231.60

235.96

260.00

236.00

244.00

539.96

619.60

396.00

SOURCE : Canadean

PACK TYPE/SIZE
(CL)

BRAND

PRICE PER UNIT (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

PRICE PER LITRE (RSD)


2009
2010
2011

640.00

580.00

620.00

640.00

NRGLASS

25

ENERGIS (SI & SI)

160.00

145.00

CAN

25

BOOSTER (NECTAR)

155.00

160.00

25

BURN

300.00

25

GUARANA (KNJAZ MILOS)

165.00

150.00

170.00

660.00

600.00

680.00

25

RED BULL (AUSTRIA)

285.00

260.00

275.00

1,140.00

1,040.00

1,100.00

175.00

700.00

1,200.00

SOURCE : Canadean

Production

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

0.3

0.7

2.5

4.7

5.7

7.4

8.7

10.0

10.5

11.3

12.2

13.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.9

1.3

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

Imports
Exports

0.1

0.4

0.9

1.5

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

Consumption

0.2

0.5

1.9

3.7

5.1

7.1

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

1.3

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Austria

1.3

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Others

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.6

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total
Original Energy

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

9.4

10.4

9.7

9.4

10.1

86.9 %

86.7 %

78.2 %

71.5 %

71.1 %

1.1

2.1

2.4

8.6 %

15.9 %

16.9 %

1.6

1.6

1.7

1.7

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

12.0 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Flavour Mixes
Orange

% Share

1.4

Other Fruit
SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

13.1 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Guarana

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

1.0

2.0

8.2 %

15.5 %

Ultra
Energis

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

Red Bull

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

Booster

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.4 %

3.7 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

Battery

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Burn

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.5 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

Pink Up

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Fast Energy

0.1

0.0

Top Power (Nectar)

0.1

0.0

Others

0.9

0.1

0.1

Other Private Label

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.9 %

0.2 %

10.1 %

0.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total Energy Drinks

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

1.0

2.0

8.2 %

15.5 %

- Guarana
- Ultra
- Energis

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

- Red Bull

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

- Booster

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.4 %

3.7 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

- Battery

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

- Burn

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.5 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Others

0.9

0.1

- Other Private Label


- Pink Up
- Fast Energy

0.1

0.0

- Top Power (Nectar)

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

10.1 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.9 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Million Litres

% Share

2009

2010

2009

2010

Total Energy Drinks

0.0

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Carbonated

0.0

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- RTD

0.0

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.0

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Other Private Label


SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Carlsberg Group

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

- Battery

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Coca-Cola

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

- Burn

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.5 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.0

2.0

8.2 %

15.5 %

Total

- Ultra
Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

- Guarana

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

- Booster

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.4 %

3.7 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

- Pink Up
- Top Power (Nectar)

0.1

0.0

Others

0.9

0.1

0.1

- Other Private Label

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.9 %

0.2 %

10.1 %

0.8 %

- Others

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

10.1 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Parksystem

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Fast Energy

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

- Red Bull

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

Sinalco

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

- Energis

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Carlsberg Serbia

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

- Battery

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

CCHBC

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

- Burn

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.5 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.0

2.0

8.2 %

15.5 %

Total

- Ultra
Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

- Guarana

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

- Booster

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.4 %

3.7 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

2.7 %

3.8 %

2.9 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

2.3 %

3.0 %

2.1 %

- Pink Up
- Top Power (Nectar)

0.1

0.0

Others

0.9

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.4

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.3

- Other Private Label


- Others

0.9

0.1

- Red Bull

0.9 %

0.2 %

10.1 %

0.8 %

10.1 %

0.8 %

Pivara Vrsac

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Fast Energy

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.3

0.9

1.2

8.4 %

11.1 %

10.8 %

7.2 %

9.0 %

- Red Bull

0.8

1.2

1.3

0.9

1.2

8.4 %

11.1 %

10.8 %

7.2 %

9.0 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

- Energis

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

Coca-Cola
Sinalco

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Carlsberg Group

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Parksystem

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Others

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

10.1 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

CCHBC
Si & Si (Sinalco)

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.3

0.9

1.2

8.4 %

11.1 %

10.8 %

7.2 %

9.0 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Carlsberg Serbia
Pivara Vrsac

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Others

0.9

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.4

10.1 %

0.8 %

2.7 %

3.8 %

2.9 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

Total Energy Drinks

10.8

12.1

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Total Non-Refillable

10.8

12.1

12.4

13.2

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

- Glass

1.1

1.2

1.2

0.6

0.6

10.4 %

9.5 %

9.5 %

4.7 %

4.3 %

- Bottle

1.1

1.2

1.2

0.6

0.6

10.4 %

9.5 %

9.5 %

4.7 %

4.3 %

- 25cl

1.1

1.2

1.2

0.6

0.6

10.4 %

9.5 %

9.5 %

4.7 %

4.3 %

- Metal

9.4

10.6

11.0

12.4

13.4

86.9 %

87.8 %

88.7 %

93.6 %

94.5 %

- Can

9.4

10.6

11.0

12.4

13.4

86.9 %

87.8 %

88.7 %

93.6 %

94.5 %

- 25cl

9.4

10.6

11.0

12.4

13.4

86.9 %

87.8 %

88.7 %

93.6 %

94.5 %

- PET

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

2.8 %

2.7 %

1.9 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Bottle

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

2.8 %

2.7 %

1.9 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- 33cl

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.8 %

2.7 %

1.5 %

1.1 %

0.7 %

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- 100cl

PDF Editor

Million Litres
2007

2008

2009

% Share
2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011F

10.8

12.1

12.4

13.1

14.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Off-Premise

3.6

4.2

4.4

5.1

6.2

33.3 %

34.9 %

35.6 %

38.7 %

43.3 %

On-Premise

7.2

7.9

8.0

8.0

8.1

66.7 %

65.1 %

64.4 %

61.3 %

56.7 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Table 4.1 - Soft Drinks By Market Definition, 2008-2010 .................................................................................... 2


Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 3
Packaged Water Plain ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Flavoured Water .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Functional Water ................................................................................................................................................. 3
Juice/Juice Drinks ............................................................................................................................................... 3
Still Drinks (Low/No Fruit) ................................................................................................................................... 4
Local Products..................................................................................................................................................... 4

PDF Editor

Million Litres
Category

2008

2009

2010

1,444.1

1,371.8

1,369.1

Packaged Water - Plain

579.5

567.1

576.8

-Medicinal Water

131.1

111.9

110.2

Flavoured Water

2.4

1.5

1.2

Functional Water

0.4

0.4

0.3

487.1

435.7

444.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

223.4

203.9

178.4

Still Drinks (Low/No Fruit)

84.8

88.3

85.5

Squash/Syrups

26.0

26.1

29.5

Fruit Powders

17.7

18.3

19.5

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks

10.1

14.6

18.9

Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks

0.1

0.1

0.1

Sports Drinks

0.7

0.8

1.3

Energy Drinks

12.0

12.4

13.1

Total

Carbonates
-Kvass
Juice/Juice Drinks

SOURCE : Trade Interviews; Canadean Wisdom

PDF Editor

Overview
Fairly good match local vs global trends
With the exception of several still drinks locally perceived as flavoured or functional waters, and kvass which is
a specific carbonated drink for the Serbian market, there was a good match between local perception and the
global definition of soft drinks categories. Serbian soft drinks consumption was fairly in line with European
trends, but less sophisticated and dominated by plain packaged water and carbonates. There were no
smoothie or energy shots available yet, although nectars and energy drinks were well developed in Serbia and
benefited from the contribution of strong local producers.

Packaged Water Plain


Medicinal water features
Only one producer, Minaqua, sold mineral water with medicinal claims, the water was also used in a still drink
called Jodi, with reference to the iodine content. Prolom (Planinka) has a very good image among medical
staff for helping with kidney problems. This is known around Serbia, however Planinka do not actively promote
this due to the high cost of marketing.

Flavoured Water
Imported Jana leads consumption
The Knjaz Milos flavoured water brand, in several flavours, was re-launched in 2009, but volumes remain
negligible.
There was also an Aqua Viva Hydroactive (fast rehydration) and Aqua Viva Recharge (improve physical
endurance) sports drink from Knjaz Milos that was perceived as flavoured water.

Functional Water
One brand only
The only functional water available was Aqua Viva Slim with L-Carnitine and green tea, produced by leading
company Knjaz Milos. Although well received by a small segment of sophisticated consumers, volumes sold
remains insignificant.

Juice/Juice Drinks
Vino Zupa and Nectar leading producers
Due to the unusually high consumption of nectars, the juice/juice drinks category was over three times larger
when compared to low fruit still drinks, 100% juice accounted for just over 10% of it. The market was highly
aggregated with a couple of producers (Next, Vino Zupa, Nectar) accounting for more than half of total
consumption. The development of large sized carton (200cl) in the past few years assisted with the categorys
growth.

PDF Editor

Still Drinks (Low/No Fruit)


Hello and Na Eks driving consumption
Unlike other countries where normally low fruit content still drinks accounted for the majority of JNSD
consumption, in Serbia the still drinks category developed slightly, but faced pressure from traditionally high
nectars consumption. The launch of Hello (Fruvita) in 2004, as well as the extended distribution line from local
brand Na Eks (with highly affordable price), gave the category a boost. These two brands accounted more
than 40% of the total still drinks category.

Local Products
Fermented Kvass, the only local product
There was only one local product, kvass produced by BIP, but volume was extremely limited due to BIPs poor
financial situation.

PDF Editor

CATEGORY COVERAGE OF COMPANY PROFILES ...................................................................................... 3


COCA-COLA ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Coca-Cola Market Position (Owner) ................................................................................................................... 9
COCA-COLA HELLENIC BOTTLING COMPANY - SRBIJA ............................................................................ 10
CCHBC Market Position (Operator) .................................................................................................................. 14
PEPSICO .......................................................................................................................................................... 15
PepsiCo Market Position (Owner) ..................................................................................................................... 17
A&P ................................................................................................................................................................... 18
A&P Market Position (Operator) ........................................................................................................................ 20
ARTESKA INTERNATIONAL ............................................................................................................................ 21
Arteska International Market Position (Owner) ................................................................................................. 23
ATLANTIC GRUPA ........................................................................................................................................... 24
Multivita Market Position (Owner) ..................................................................................................................... 25
BIP ..................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Bip Belgrade Market Position (Operator) .......................................................................................................... 29
FRUVITA ........................................................................................................................................................... 30
Fruvita Market Position (Owner) ....................................................................................................................... 33
KNJAZ MILOS ................................................................................................................................................... 34
Knjaz Milos Market Position (Owner) ................................................................................................................ 37
MINAQUA .......................................................................................................................................................... 38
Minaqua Market Position (Operator) ................................................................................................................. 39
NECTAR ............................................................................................................................................................ 40
Nectar Market Position (Owner) ........................................................................................................................ 45
PALANACKI KISELJAK .................................................................................................................................... 46
Palanacki Kiseljack Market Position (Operator) ................................................................................................ 47
RODIC MB ........................................................................................................................................................ 48
Rodic Market Position (Owner) ......................................................................................................................... 50
SWISSLION-TAKOVO ...................................................................................................................................... 51
Swisslion Takovo Market Position (Operator) ................................................................................................... 53
UNIJA DISTRIBUTERA SRBIJE ....................................................................................................................... 54
VINO ZUPA ....................................................................................................................................................... 55
Vino Zupa Market Position (Owner) .................................................................................................................. 58
VODA VRNJCI .................................................................................................................................................. 59
Voda Vrnjci Market Position (Owner) ................................................................................................................ 61

PDF Editor

Soft Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................... 62


Soft Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................ 64
Packaged Water Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................. 65
Packaged Water Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................... 66
Bulk/HOD Water Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .............................................................................. 67
Bulk/HOD Water Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................... 67
Carbonates Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ...................................................................................... 68
Carbonates Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................... 69
Juice Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................ 69
Juice Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ..................................................................................................... 70
Nectars Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................ 70
Nectars Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ................................................................................................. 71
Still Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 72
Still Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................................. 72
Squash/Syrups Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................ 73
Squash/Syrups Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ..................................................................................... 74
Fruit Powders Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .................................................................................. 74
Fruit Powders Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 74
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ....................................................................... 75
Iced/RTD Tea Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ............................................................................ 75
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .................................................................. 76
Iced/RTD Coffee Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................ 76
Sports Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 ................................................................................... 77
Sports Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ........................................................................................ 77
Energy Drinks Leading Trademark Owners, 2006-2010 .................................................................................. 77
Energy Drinks Leading Local Operators, 2006-2010 ....................................................................................... 78

PDF Editor

MULTINATIONAL
COMPANIES
Coca-Cola
CCHBC
PepsiCo

Packaged
Water

Carbonates

x
x

x
x
x

INTERNATIONAL/
DOMESTIC COMPANIES
A&P
Arteska
x
International
BIP
x
Atlantic Grupa
Fruvita
Knjaz Milos
x
Minaqua
x
Nectar
x
Palanacki
x
Kiseljak
Rodic MB
x
Swisslion-Takovo
Unija Distrbuters
Sjbike
Vino Zupa
Voda Vrnjci
x

Juice Nectars

x
x

x
x

Still
Drinks

Squash/
Syrups

Fruit
Iced/
Powders Rtd Tea

x
x

Iced/ Sports Energy


Rtd
Drinks Drinks
Coffee

x
x
x

x
x
x

x
x

x
x

x
x

x
x

x
x

x
x
x
x

x
x

x
x

x
x

PDF Editor

COCA-COLA
Batajnicki drum 14-16, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 3073 100 Fax: +381 11 3081 177
www.coca-cola.com

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Carbonates, packaged water, juice, nectars, still drinks, iced/rtd tea drinks and energy drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


IBP Beograd, which carries out local production of Coca-Cola products, is 68% owned by Balkinvest Holding
Ltd, itself a subsidiary of the Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company (CCHBC). The Coca-Cola Company
(TCCC) owns 24% of CCHBC.

COMPANY HISTORY
1967
1968
1970
1989
1993
1996
1997
1999
2000
2001
2003
2004

2005
2006
2010

State-owned beverage company Slovin obtained the licence to produce and distribute the Coca-Cola
range in Serbia
A new Coca-Cola bottling plant was built and became operational in Zemun (near Belgrade)
Slovin became the authorised bottler of the Schweppes range and produced these in the old Zemun
plant, alongside its own Jupi and Cockta brands
Slovin merged the two bottling operations and becomes IBP
IBP was privatised
Fresh & Co was founded
Balkinvest Holding Ltd, a subsidiary of the Greek Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company, acquired a
majority stake in IBP
Company was awarded a gold medal for quality at the Agricultural Fair in Novi Sad
Company suffered effects of war, but production did not cease
TCCC acquired the Schweppes brand portfolio in certain countries (including Serbia)
Fresh & Co signed a partnership agreement with the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (EBRD) and benefited from a 12.5 m investment to strengthen its position in the region
Fresh & Co acquired an aseptic PET Procomac filling line for still drinks
The World Juice Conference in Amsterdam awarded Next Raspberry the industry's top prize - the World
Juice Innovation Award for Best New Juice Product 2004
The Serbian Agency for Foreign Investments and Exports Promotion awarded Fresh & Co the best new
export product prize for Next Raspberry
CCHBC joined with TCCC and acquireed Vlasinka (Simpo Group) for 21.5 m
Acquisition of 100% of Fresh & Co for 19.5 m was finalised. Acquisition included production facilities
and two brands: Next and Su Voce
Coca-Cola continued the Coca-Cola Talents Program by recruiting the fifth generation of students to
attend training courses and gain experience working in ongoing projects.

PDF Editor

Company
Vlasinka

Shareholding
CCHBC/TCCC

Fresh & Co

CCHBC/TCCC

Comment
Mineral water production plant, acquired in
2005
Non-carbonated soft drinks production plant,
acquired in 2006

FOREIGN TRADE
The company's products are exported to Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Hungary, Macedonia and the UK.

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Rosa

Still
Rosa

Carbonates
Cola
Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola
Light
Coca-Cola
Zero

Regular

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

33
50
75
150

x
x

33
50
75
150
600
150

x
x

Low calorie
Low calorie

20

25
33
50
100
200

Bitter lemon

Can

Carton

Bulk

25
33
50
150
25

Other
Plastic

25
33
50
100
200
Bulk
200

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Schweppes
Tonic

PVC

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

33
50
100
150
Other Non-Fruit Flavours
Fanta
Elderflower/
Shokata
lemon

25

Schweppes

Orange

Orange/mango
Tangerine

Lemon-lime
Sprite

Clear Lemonade
Schweppes
Other Fruit Flavours
Fanta
Exotic
Fanta

Juice (100%)
Next
Premium

Pineapple

Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, peach
Apple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
pineapple,
strawberry
Red grapefruit,
orange,
multivitamin
Apple,
multivitamin,
peach,

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Bulk

x
x
x

25
33
50
100
200
Bulk
200
25
50
150

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk

25

25
33
200
25
50
200

20

PVC

x
x
x

50
200
Orange
Fanta

PET
ref
nr

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x

20

33

35

PDF Editor

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour
Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, orange
with pulp, peach,
pineapple,
strawberry,
tomato

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Next Classic
Blackcurrant, sour
cherry, peach,
strawberry ,
apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, pineapple
Apple, pineapple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
strawberry,
Apple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
strawberry, citrus
mix, exotic
Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
pear, pineapple,
sour cherry,
strawberry, citrus
mix, exotic
Next
Antioxidant
Bodytime
Prebiotic
Next Buci
Buci
Su Voce

Cardio
Banana, peach
Peach

Still Drinks (less than 25% juice)


Next Joy
Apple, orange
multivitamin,
elderflower
Rosa
Emotion
Su Voce

Peach/aloe vera,
citrus/guarana
Blackcurrant/
aronia/apple
Orange, apple,
blackcurrant/
aronia/apple,
melon, multi

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

100

20

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton
x

20

33

100

20

33
100
33
100
100
20

x
x
x
x
x
x

100
150

x
x

50

150
50

x
x

100

150

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour
tropical
Orange, apple,
blackcurrant/
aronia/apple

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Nestea
Lemon

Peach

Energy Drinks
Burn
Guarana
Ultra Energy
Fruit Punch

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

200

25
50
100
150
25
50
150

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

x
x
x
x
x
x

25
25

PDF Editor

x
x
x

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

250.1

295.8

320.9

321.2

335.1

20.0 %

21.4 %

22.2 %

23.5 %

24.5 %

Carbonates

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

- Coca-Cola

140.9

165.0

177.7

177.3

181.1

33.6 %

36.4 %

36.5 %

40.7 %

40.7 %

- Fanta

25.5

29.6

29.6

30.4

34.5

6.1 %

6.5 %

6.1 %

7.0 %

7.8 %

- Schweppes

16.6

22.6

21.9

19.9

19.0

4.0 %

5.0 %

4.5 %

4.6 %

4.3 %

5.1

6.6

8.3

9.4

9.5

1.2 %

1.4 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

2.1 %

Packaged Water

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

- Rosa

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Still Drinks

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

- Su Voce

10.1

14.5

10.6

9.0

10.2 %

13.4 %

9.8 %

8.8 %

2.1

3.8

4.1

3.8

2.1 %

3.5 %

3.8 %

3.7 %

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

- Sprite

- Next
- Rosa
Nectars

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

- Next

5.2

6.9

7.6

8.1

8.4

3.6 %

4.6 %

4.4 %

5.1 %

6.1 %

19.1

2.4

2.3

1.8

1.3

13.3 %

1.6 %

1.3 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

Juice

5.9

8.3

7.9

7.9

7.5

21.1 %

27.6 %

25.2 %

29.4 %

29.0 %

- Next

5.7

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

20.3 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

8.2 %

15.5 %

0.9 %

1.1 %

- Su Voce

- Minute Maid
- Su Voce

0.2

0.0

Energy Drinks

0.8 %
0.2

- Ultra
- Burn

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.0

2.0

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

1.5 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

- Next

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

COCA-COLA HELLENIC BOTTLING COMPANY - SRBIJA


Batajnicki drum 14-16, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
Tel: 381 11 3073 100
www.coca-colahbc.com

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Production, sale and distribution of Coca-Cola branded non-alcoholic beverages.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


Coca-Cola HBC: The Coca-Cola Company 24%, Kar-Tess Group 30%, Other 46%.

COMPANY HISTORY
1967 State-owned beverage company Slovin obtained the licence to produce and distribute the Coca-Cola
range in Serbia
1968 A new Coca-Cola bottling plant was built in Zemun (near Belgrade) and began production of the CocaCola range
1970 Slovin became the authorised bottler of the Schweppes range and produced these in the old Zemun
plant, alongside its own Jupi and Cockta brands
1989 IBP formed through merger of both Slovin operations. IBP produces all Coca-Cola products
1993 IBP was privatised
1996 Fresh & Co founded
1997 Balkinvest Holding Ltd, a subsidiary of the Greek Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company, acquired a
majority stake in IBP
2001 TCCC acquired the Schweppes brand portfolio in certain countries, including Serbia
2002 Schweppes re-launched following the acquisition by Cadbury
2003 Fresh & Co signed a partnership agreement with the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (EBRD) and benefited from a 12.5 m investment to strengthen its position in the region
2004 Fresh & Co acquired an aseptic PET Procomac filling line for still drinks
CCHBC installed a new PET line
2005 CCHBC joined with TCCC and acquireed Vlasinka (Simpo Group) for 21.5 m
CCHBC installed new can line
2006 Acquisition of 100% Fresh & Co, producer of fruit juices and nectars in Serbia, for 19.5 m was
finalised. The acquisition includes production facilities and two brands: Next and Su Voce
2008 Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company (CCHBC) invested up to 4 m in its Vlasinka mineral water plant.
A new PET bottling line became operational, with a capacity of 16,800 bottles per hour for 50cl and
150cl PET bottles
2009 Coca-Cola HBC Balkan Holding B.V. took over an 89% stake in the Serbian subsidiary of Coca-Cola
Hellenic Bottling Company (HBC)
2010 CCHBC continued cooperation for the sixth consecutive year in the environmentally friendly program
Active for Rivers with the Danube Day Association, promoting the importance of clean water and rivers.

PDF Editor

Company

Shareholding

Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company Crna Gora Podgorica


Vlasinka
Fresh & Co

100% CCHBC

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Rosa

Still
Rosa

Carbonates
Cola
Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola
Light
Coca-Cola
Zero

Regular

Size
In cl

100% CCHBC/TCCC
100% CCHBC/TCCC

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

33
50
75
150

x
x

33
50
75
150
600

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Low calorie
Low calorie

20

25
33
50
100
200

25
33
50
150
25
33
50
100
150

Bitter lemon

PVC

Mineral water production plant, acquired in 2005


Non-carbonated soft drinks production plant,
acquired in 2006

25
33
50
100
200
Bulk
200

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Schweppes
Tonic

Comment

x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

x
x
x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Other Non-Fruit Flavours


Fanta
Elderflower/
Shokata
lemon

Size
In cl

25

Glass
rb
nr

Schweppes

Orange

Orange/mango
Tangerine

Lemon-lime
Sprite

Clear Lemonade
Schweppes
Other Fruit Flavours
Fanta
Exotic
Fanta

Juice
(100%)
Next
Premium

Pineapple

Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, peach
Apple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
pineapple,
strawberry
Red grapefruit,
orange,
multivitamin
Apple,
multivitamin,
peach,
Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, orange
with pulp, peach,
pineapple,

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Bulk

x
x

25
33
50
100
200
Bulk
200
25
50
150

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk

25

25
33
200
25
50
200

20

PVC

50
200
Orange
Fanta

PET
ref
nr

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x

20

33

35
100

PDF Editor

x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

strawberry,
tomato

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Next Classic
Blackcurrant, sour
cherry, peach,
strawberry ,
apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, pineapple
Apple, pineapple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
strawberry,
Apple,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
strawberry, citrus
mix, exotic
Apple, apricot,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
pear, pineapple,
sour cherry,
strawberry, citrus
mix, exotic
Next
Antioxidant
Bodytime
Probiotic
Next Buci
Buci
Su Voce

Cardio
Banana, peach
Peach

Still Drinks (less than 25% juice)


Next Joy
Apple, orange
multivitamin,
elderflower
Rosa
Emotion
Su Voce

Peach/aloe vera,
citrus/guarana
Blackcurrant/
aronia/apple
Orange, apple,
blackcurrant/
aronia/apple,
melon, multi
tropical

20

20

33

100

20

33
100
33
100
100
20

x
x
x
x
x
x

100
150

x
x

50

150
50

x
x

100

150

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Size
In cl

Flavour
Orange, apple,
blackcurrant/
aronia/apple

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Nestea
Lemon

Guarana
Fruit Punch

PET
ref
nr

200

25
50
100
150
25
50
150

Peach

Energy
Drinks
Burn
Ultra Energy

Glass
rb
nr

Other
Plastic

PVC

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

x
x
x
x
x
x

25
25

x
x

Note: IBP produces all Coca-Coca products, with CCHBC producing only Nestea, Burn and Ultra

Million Litres
2006

2007

% Share

2008

2009

2010

Total

2.4

7.9

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

2.3

- Nestea
Energy Drinks

2008

2009

2010

12.0

0.2 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

1.0

2.0

8.2 %

15.5 %

0.1

0.1

0.9 %

1.1 %

- Ultra
- Burn

0.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2006

2007

1.5 %

PEPSICO
Pepsi-Cola International
17-19, Felix Str. Bucharest 1, Romania
Tel: +40 21 317 2800 Fax: +40 21 317 2802
www.pepsico.com

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


PepsiCo is active in carbonates, sports drinks and iced/rtd tea drinks

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


PepsiCo, USA

COMPANY HISTORY
1998 PepsiCo launched its new look, with a stylized, three-dimensional Pepsi Globe on a blue ice backdrop
1999 PepsiCo celebrated its centennial year. The theme of a new campaign is 'The Joy of Cola'
2008 PepsiCo Inc acquired 100% stake in Belgrade-based potato chips producer Marbo Product for an
undisclosed amount. Marbo Product owns a factory near Novi Sad, one factory in Lakta and several
distribution centres in Croatia, Albania, Greece, Macedonia and Montenegro
2009 The company entered the iced/rtd tea drinks market as a result of the worldwide partnership agreement
between PepsiCo and Unilever

Company
A&P Dobanovci

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Carbonates
Cola
Pepsi-Cola

Regular

Diet Pepsi /
Pepsi Light

Low calorie

Territory
Serbia

Size
In cl

25
33
50
100
150
200
250
Bulk
25

Glass
rb
nr

Comment
From 1998 linked to Cyprus Pepsi-Cola bottler

PET
ref
nr

x
x

33

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

x
x
x
x
x
x
x

[1]

x
x
x

Segment/
Brand

Pepsi Max

Pepsi Twist

Flavour

Low calorie

With lemon

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Evervess
Bitter lemon

Evervess
Orange
Mirinda

Tonic

Orange

Lemon-lime
7-Up

Lemon
Ivi
Mirinda

Lemon
Lemon

Other Fruit Flavours


Ivi
Peach
Ivi Ricoco
Orange/ apricot

Size
In cl

50
100
150
200
250
25
33
50
100
150
200
250
Bulk
25
33
50
100
150
200
250
Bulk

Glass
rb
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Bulk

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

25
33
150
200
250
25
33
150

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk

33
150
200

PET
ref
nr

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

33
33

PDF Editor

x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Size
In cl

Flavour

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Lipton
Lemon, peach,
green tea

Sports Drinks
Gatorade

Orange, lemon

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

50

150

50

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Million Litres

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

66.3

72.3

87.7

66.1

70.3

5.3 %

5.2 %

6.1 %

4.8 %

5.1 %

Carbonates

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

- Pepsi-Cola

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

13.7 %

13.5 %

15.8 %

13.2 %

13.8 %

- Mirinda

5.0

5.6

4.7

4.3

4.5

1.2 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Ivi

1.6

1.0

1.3

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Sports Drinks

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.1

0.3

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

- Gatorade

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.1

0.3

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

A&P
Marala Tita 204, 11242 Dobanovci, Belgrade, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 8469 100; 603 433; 699 385; 8465 130 Fax: +381 11 846 5440
www.pepsi.rs

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Active in carbonates, sports drinks and iced/rtd tea drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


PepsiCo, USA

COMPANY HISTORY
1998

1999
2007

2009

Company founded as Pepsi-Cola bottler by acquiring NAVIPs plant. It is owned by the Cyprus-based
Andreou & Paraskevaides Group of Companies, which also owns the authorized Pepsi bottlers in
Cyprus and Libya
Pepsi launched its new look, with a stylised, three-dimensional Pepsi Globe on a blue ice backdrop. The
new look affected packaging also
A&P launched own carbonates range, Lex
PepsiCo celebrated its centennial year. The theme of the new campaign is 'The Joy of Cola'
Authorised Pepsi bottler for Serbia, A&P d o o Belgrade was given the esteemed international award Golden Trophy for Food & Beverages. The award was granted by the Trade Leader's Club, a globally
known organization from Madrid
Pepsi-Cola promoted new visual identity and brand image. The company's well-known stylised globe
and the Pepsi-Cola logo featured on changing backgrounds and themes suited to different consumer
tastes The entire concept targeted young consumers and their interests. The new design was
developed in various directions: travel, festivals, emoticons, digital downloads, photo booths, zodiac and
net talk.
For the fifth year in a row, Pepsi and Gatorade supported the traditional rollerblade race in Belgrade,
an event that gathers 3,000 competitors of all ages
The company entered the iced/rtd tea drinks market in cooperation with Unilever

PDF Editor

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Carbonates
Cola
Pepsi-Cola

Regular

Diet Pepsi / Pepsi


Light

Pepsi Max

Pepsi Twist

Low calorie

Low calorie

With lemon

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Evervess
Bitter lemon

Evervess
Orange
Mirinda

Tonic

Orange

Size
In cl

25
33
50
100
150
200

Glass
rb
nr

x
x

250
Bulk
25
33
50
100
150
200
250
25
33
50
100
150
200
250
Bulk
25
33
50
100
150
200
250
Bulk

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

25
33
150
200
250
25
33
150

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk

x
x
x
x
x

x
x
x

PDF Editor

x
x
x
x
x
x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Size
In cl

Flavour

Lemon-lime
7-Up

Lemon
Ivi
Mirinda

25
33
50
100
150
200
Bulk
Lemon
Lemon

PET
ref
nr

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Lipton
Lemon, peach,
green tea

Orange, lemon

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Bulk

Notes

x
x
x
x
x
x
x

33
150
200

Other Fruit Flavours


Ivi
Peach
Ivi Ricoco
Orange/ apricot

Sports Drinks
Gatorade

Glass
rb
nr

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x

33
33

x
x

50

150

50

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

66.3

72.3

87.7

66.9

71.4

5.3 %

5.2 %

6.1 %

4.9 %

5.2 %

Carbonates

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

- Pepsi-Cola

57.3

61.3

76.9

57.7

61.5

13.7 %

13.5 %

15.8 %

13.2 %

13.8 %

- Mirinda

5.0

5.6

4.7

4.3

4.5

1.2 %

1.2 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

- 7-Up

1.1

1.9

2.3

2.4

2.4

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

- Evervess

1.1

2.0

1.9

1.2

1.3

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

- Ivi

1.6

1.0

1.3

0.3

0.3

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Lex

0.0

Sports Drinks

0.1

89.0 %

91.8 %

69.4 %

88.7 %

58.3 %

62.2 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

0.0 %
0.4

0.6

0.5

1.0

0.5

0.7

0.1

0.3

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

- Lipton

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

- Aqua Viva
- Gatorade

0.1

0.4

0.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

29.2 %

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

ARTESKA INTERNATIONAL
Ivana Gorana Kovacica 3, 24000 Subotica, Serbia
Tel: +381 24 626 600 Fax: +381 24 626 619

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Primarily active in carbonated and sports drinks and licensed in packaged water and energy drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


100% privately owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
1946
1951
1993
1997
2002
2004

2005

2006
2007

2008

2010

Suboticanka was founded as an independent company. It initially produced soda and ice. It later
produced jams, marmalades and alcoholic beverages
Company name changed to Si&Si
Company underwent a complete restructuring of all operations
Arteska International was established as the successor to Si&Si and signed a licensing agreement with
Sinalco International GmbH for Sinalco soft drinks
Production of EnergiS started under licence from Sinalco
Sidel PET bottling line, with a capacity of 15 m litres per month, installed for bottling spring water
Voda Voda spring water launched
Arteska Group acquired 90% of Podrum Palic
Voda Voda exported to Asia. This was followed by exports to Dubai
Construction began on a new Sinalco production facility
Voda Voda 2 (enriched with CO2) launched
Sinalco Rosso launched
ISO 9001:2000 and HACCP obtained for Voda Voda production
Sinalco Serbia, a joint venture between Sinalco International GmbH and Serbian Group Si&Si, was
founded
Voda Voda voted the most popular brand at The International Brand Fair in Belgrade
Voda Voda 200cl bag in box bulk water launched
The new Sinalco production plant in Vrujci became operational with the first four bottling lines of 900 m
litre capacity
In order to support expansion and modernisation plans, Si&Si looked for a strategic partner to purchase
30% of the company's shares
Voda Voda penetrated the Russian market, achieving distribution in over 500 supermarkets and
planned to start exporting to Japan
Voda Voda obtained Fresenius certificate allowing exportation to EU countries
The company announced an investment of 11 m in a new water plant Izvor 593 in Banja Vrujci with
24,000 units/hour capacity. Plans for exporting to south-east Europe, Asia, Singapore, Taiwan, Japan
and Korea were also revealed
Si&Si planned to move Voda Voda to Montenegro where current owner (Slovenian company Grenki
List) is trying to find the best location for the construction of a new bottling plant
Sinalco International GmbH & Co Germany withdrew the bottling licence granted to Si&Si undergoing
bankruptcy procedures. Sinalco licence for Serbia and Montenegro was bought by Unija distributera
Srbije for 0.5 m and new bottling agreement was made with Frutico from Sabac in April 2010.
Unija distributera Srbije (see Company Profile) is a strong distribution company founded as the buying
group, of several local distribution companies. Today, they have 8 distribution centres: Zrenjanin; Novi
Sad; Kovin; Beograd; abac; Uice; Parain; Ni

PDF Editor

Company
Arteska (formerly Si & Si)

Territory
Serbia

Comment
Sinalco franchisee since 1997

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Alcoholic drinks and fruit conserves.

DISTRIBUTION
The company has distribution centres in Novi Sad, Sabac, Vrsac, Sremska Mitrovica, Pancevo, Krakuevac,
Krusevac, Nis, Prjepolje, Paracin, Cacak and Vrnjacka Banja.

Site
Si & Si Company
24 000 Subotica
Tel: 024/546 614
Fax: 024/546 042
Voda Voda
Selo Popadi
14243 Gornja Toplica
Podrum Palic
Josipa Kolumba 33
24413 Pali
Banja Vrujci

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Voda Voda
Still
Voda Voda

Spring Water

Energy Drinks
EnergiS

Capacity

Comment
Production of soft drinks

Production of packaged and bulk/HOD water

Production of alcoholic beverages

900 m litres

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

50
150
33
50
75
150
25
33

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

2.1 %

1.6 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

Packaged Water

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

- Voda

25.5

21.5

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.8 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

0.3

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

- Voda Voda

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

ATLANTIC GRUPA
Dragaevska, 11000 Beograd, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 285 14 35 Fax: + 381 11 285 14 70
www.cedevita.hr
www.atlantic.hr

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Vitamin and mineral beverage products.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


Atlantic Grupa.

COMPANY HISTORY
1920s The production tradition of today's Cedevita d.o.o. portfolio began in Croatia
1929 The first factory in Croatia for the production of dietary products, a branch office of the Swiss
companyDr A Wander, was built at the location of the company's present headquarters in Borongaj.
1947 Processing, production and preparation of teas began, when 'Biljana', a factory for the processing of
tea plants, was built in Trogir
1971 Cedevita first produced in Croatia by Pliva's food division
2000 Pliva established Cedevita as an independent company
2001 Atlantic Trade (part of the Atlantic Grupa) acquired Cedevita in partnership with DEG. A subsidiary
was established in Serbia
2003 Cedevita launched on the Serbian market (imported from Croatia)
2004 Sports drinks powder Cedevita discontinued
2005 Cedevita Kids launched on the Serbian market
2007 Atlantica Grupa purchased Multivita in May, for 6 m
2009 Croatian Atlantic Grupa, owner of Cedevita and Multivita, signed the contract on the construction of
the fruit powders factory in Vrsac. The project was financed by the European Mission with 3.5 m.
The company finalised an investment of 10 m in the production plant for Cedevita Go and this
innovative brand was launched
Croatian Atlantic Grupa, owner of Cedevita and Multivita, launched a bid for Slovenian Droga
Kolinska, majority owner of Palanacki Kiseljak
2010 Atlantic Grupa bought Droga Kolinska, with its companies Palanacki Kiseljak (Cockta bottler and water
producer), Grand (coffee) and Soko Stark (food) for 382 (150 m debt included) in July, 2010.

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Production of vitamins, minerals, dietary products and pressed candies.

FOREIGN TRADE
Limited volumes exported in neighbouring countries.

PDF Editor

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Fruit
Powders
Cedevita

Orange, lemon

Size
In g

Wild berry,
tropical
Orange

Cedevita
Kids

Orange

Cedevita Go
Multivita

Orange
Orange, lemon,
strawberry, wild
berries,
grapefruit

Multivita
Junior

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

200
500
1000
200

Grapefruit,
mandarin

Cedevita
Light

Glass
rb
nr

Carton

1000
200

180

430
200

Bulk

Notes

x
x
x
x

500
433
200

x
x
x

500
1000
200

Orange

Can

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x

x
x

Million Litres
2006

2007

Total

2.5

Fruit Powders

2008

% Share
2006

2007

3.0

0.2 %

0.2 %

2.5

3.0

22.1 %

20.4 %

- Multivita (Atlantic
Grupa)

2.3

2.8

20.4 %

18.7 %

- Top Power (Multivita)

0.2

0.3

1.8 %

1.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

BIP
Bulevar Vojvode Putnika 5, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 369 2983 Fax: +381 11 647 579
www.bip.co.rs

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


BIP is primarily involved in the beer market, but also produces soft drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


51.8% United Nordic Beverages, Sweden and Alita, Lithuania; 48.2% share capital.

COMPANY HISTORY
1839
1850
1872
1880
1885
1889
1917
1920
1921

1944

1963
1967
1970
1976
1977
1996
2004
2005

2007
2008
2009

The first brewery opened in Belgrade


The brewery in Cacak was founded
Mostar brewery was built with a capacity of 50,000 hl and mass production starts
Bajlonis Brewery was built in Skadarska Belgrade
Cacak brewery increased capacity and started mass production
Awarded first gold medal for quality at the World Exposition in Paris
Mostar brewery destroyed during World War One; Bajlonis Brewery stopped production
Mostar brewery rebuilt with an increased capacity of 120,000 hl
Mostar brewery became joint stock company - The First Serbian Steam Powered Brewery Djordje
Vajfert SC'
Cacak brewery operated under the name The Brewery Kren and Stankovic
Mostar brewery nationalised under the name 7th July
Bajlonis brewery nationalised under the name Belgrade
Cacak brewery nationalised
7th July (Vajferts brewery) and Brewery Belgrade (Bajloni brewery) merged to create a combined
concern
Combined concern merged with the brewery Ovcar in Cacak leading to foundation of BIP
20th October Sremska Mitrovica and Toma Kostic Leskovac breweries incorporated into BIP
BIP carbonates range launched
Kvass production started at Skadarlija plant
BIP started production of fruit juices
Production of syrups started
Production of kvass moved to Cacak plant
Privatisation agency announced tender for selling 51.31% of BIP
The BIP carbonates range renamed Bipsi Plus. In nectars the brand renamed BIP Nature
Bipsi still drinks launched in two flavours: apple and orange
Multivitamin peach/apple nectar won gold at the International Exhibition of Quality in Monde Selection
2005, Brussels
BIP privatised at a cost of 21.4 m (plus a mandatory investment of 5.1 m)
The company delayed 40 m investment in a new brewery construction and announced plans for selling
Cacak-based malt plant
Company put off 40 m investment in a new brewery construction. Owners still planned to sell Cacakbased malt plant.
Minority shareholders of BIP soft drinks and beer producer demanded termination of the contract on the
sale of the company to Swedish-Lithuanian consortium, due to poor management, leading to alleged
three-fold drop in company value since acquisition (worth 60 m during privatisation, with current
company value of only 20 m).

PDF Editor

2010 Mandatory investment of 5.1 m was only partly fulfilled, with remaining 2.6 m not invested. Tax was
not played, together with the attempt to use BIP brand as bank collateral. Therefore, the agreement
between the Privatisation Agency and Swedish-Lithuanian consortium United Nordic Beverage and Alita
was terminated due to the unfullfiled obligation in April 2010.
BIP, a traditional and very popular brand in the past, is expecting potential new investors.

Company
Dunavgrad Belgrade
Skadarlja Belgrade
Cacak
Leskovac

Shareholding
100% BIP
100% BIP
100% BIP
100% BIP

Comment

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Brewing, vinegar production, restaurants, hotels and tourism.

DISTRIBUTION
Most products are distributed directly through 700 retail locations and distribution centres in Novi Sad, Indja,
Ruma Pozarevac, Krakuevac, Nis, Krusevac, Uzice, Nova Varos, Kraljevo, Pec, Kosovska Mitrovica and
Budva.

FOREIGN TRADE
BIP exports beer to Germany, Israel, United Kingdom and republics of the former Yugoslavia.

Site
Dunavgrad Belgrade

Skadarlija Belgrade
Cacak

Capacity
1 x 20,000 units/hour, 25cl and 100cl
glass
1 x 3,600 units/hour, 50cl and 150cl
PET
1 x 3,600 units/hour, 50cl, 200cl and
500cl PET
1 x 3,600 units/hour, 50cl, 200cl and
500cl PET

PDF Editor

Comment
For soft drinks
For soft drinks
For mineral water
For soft drinks

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Skadarska
Table
Voda

Carbonates
Cola
Bipsi
Other Non-Fruit Flavours
Bip
Kvass
Orange
Bipsi
Still Drinks (less than 25% juice)
Bipsi
Orange, apple,
blueberry
Squash/Syrups
Bip (1:8)
Orange 60%,
apricot 60%,
lemon 60%,
strawberry 60%

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

50

200
500

x
x

150

33

150

150

100

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

21.9

19.5

15.5

7.7

5.9

1.8 %

1.4 %

1.1 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

Squash/Syrups

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

- Bip

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

Carbonates

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bipsi

3.1

2.2

1.4

0.5

0.3

0.7 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

- Bip

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Packaged Water

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

- Skadarska Voda

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

11.1

11.0

8.9

1.6

0.0

14.0 %

11.1 %

8.2 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Bipsi

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

- Na Eks

5.8

6.5

7.2

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

Nectars

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

- Nature

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Juice

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

- Bip

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Total

Still Drinks

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

FRUVITA

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Producer of carbonates, juice, nectars, still drinks and iced/rtd tea drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


100% privately owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
2003 Fruvita was established in Smederevo and launched Hello nectar
First packaging machine for one litre cartons was put into operation
2005 Rosi & Catteli equipment for fruit processing installed as part of total investment of around 1 m
Exports to Bosnia and Macedonia started
Novi Sad Fair Award received for the design of Hello still drinks
2006 New PET bottling line, capable of processing 12,000 150cl bph, installed as part of a 7 m investment
Hello still drinks range of five flavours launched in 50cl and 150cl PET
2007 Novi Sad Fair Award received for high quality juices, nectars and still drinks as well as special prize for
quality of pineapple nectars and champion award for lemon and grapefruit flavoured Hello still drinks
Fruvita obtained the HACCP certificate confirming full compliance with European and world quality
standards (with intention of expanding export markets)
2008 Fruvita announced acquisition of Kolarim winery, allegedly for 84.3 m dinars
The company launched a new website occasioned by the company's 5th Anniversary
Entire portfolio was re-designed
2009 Fruvita obtained ISO 9001:2008
The company relaunched the Fruvita nectars range as Hello Fruit Party in Tetra Gemina 100cl new
packs
2010 Fruvita entered the carbonates market with Fruvita Oranzada

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Fruit processing.

FOREIGN TRADE
Montenegro, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia and Albania.

PDF Editor

Segment/
Brand
Juice (100%)
Fruvita
Premium

Flavour

Apple, tangerine,
multivitamin,
orange, peach,
pink grapefruit ,
orange with pulp,
cloudy apple

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Frutta di
Orange 50%,
Primavera
apple 50%, peach
50%, carrot/fruit
cocktail 30%,
apricot 50%,
tropical 50%,
strawberry mix
50% ,
apple/pineapple
50%
Hello Fruit
Orange + Vitamin
Party
C 50%, apricot +
vitamin C 35%,
peach + vitamin C
40%, multivitamin
50%, pineapple +
vitamin C 40%,
apple + vitamin C
50%, strawberry/
cocktail + vitamin
C 50%, cherry +
vitamin C 35%,
banana/orange +
Vitamin C 50%,
blueberry cocktail
+ Vitamin C 50%,
exotic + vitamin C
50%
Multivitamin 50%,
orange + Vitamin
C 50%, pineapple
+ vitamin C 40%,
apple + vitamin C
50%
Hello
Orange 50%,
pineapple 50%,
peach 50%,
blueberry 50%,
strawberry 50%,
multivitamin 50%,
ACE 50%,
Apple 50%

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

100

200

100

200

100

150

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand
Vocna Dolina

Flavour
Apple + vitamin C
50%, apricot +
vitamin C 50%,
peach + vitamin C
50%, pear 50%,
sour cherry +
vitamin C 35%

Still Drinks (less than 25% juice)


Hello
Multivitamin +
12%, lemon/
grapefruit ABC
12%, tangerine
with 6 vitamins
12%, green apple
12%, exotico +
vitamin C 12%,
orange/ nectarine
12%, orange BCE
10%, exotico 12%
Orange/lemon/
carrot ACE 12%
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Hello
Peach/black tea

Lemon/lime/black
tea, cranberry/
hibiscus/green tea

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

150

50

150
150

x
x

50
100
150
200
50

x
x
x

150

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

x
x

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

32.0

42.0

49.6

64.0

55.9

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

4.7 %

4.1 %

Still Drinks

22.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

- Hello

22.0

28.6

33.2

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

28.8 %

30.7 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

0.2

0.1

0.2 %

0.1 %

- Fruvita
Nectars

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

- Vocna Dolina

1.5

7.5

9.3

13.7

12.8

1.0 %

5.0 %

5.4 %

8.6 %

9.3 %

8.7

9.1

5.5 %

6.6 %

3.9

6.4

3.4

2.3 %

4.0 %

2.5 %

0.7

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

1.3

1.4

1.4

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

1.3

1.4

1.4

4.1 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

- Frutta di Primavera
- Hello

7.2

4.6

- Froovy
Juice

0.8

0.3

- Fruvita
- Hello

0.8

0.3

0.1

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

- Hello

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

5.0 %

2.9 %

3.1 %

1.0 %

2.9 %

1.0 %

0.2 %

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

KNJAZ MILOS

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Primarily active in the packaged water market. Also active in carbonates, iced/rtd tea drinks, juice, nectars, still
drinks and energy drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


96.57% FPP Balkan Ltd, 3.42% shares socially owned enterprise. FFP Balkan is part of the Salford Group.

COMPANY HISTORY
1811
1906
1965
2002

2004
2005
2006
2007

2008

2009

2010

Company founded
First exports and international awards for mineral water Knjaz Milos
Company started bottling Pepsi-Cola under licence
A new 18,000 units/hr can filling line installed to fill 15cl, 25cl and 33cl cans for carbonates and juice.
A new 20,000 units/hr line for 20cl and 25cl non-refillable glass with twist caps installed for mineral
water, carbonates, juice and still drinks
The old Tetra Pak carton filling line replaced with a new 7,000 unit/hr line
The company entered the bulk/HOD water with Aqua Una
FPP Balkan Limited (Salford group) acquired the company for 56 m, plus a further 25 m investment
A new strategy, focusing on the core categories of packaged water and energy drinks, was adopted
The company attained ISO 22000:2005 (EU standard)
Company re-launched its soft drinks business
Company established a three year distribution agreement with Carlsberg to distribute its products in
Bosnia & Herzegovina
FPP Balkan Ltd, owner of 96.57 % of Knjaz Milos, announced its intention to acquire the remaining
3.42% shares
The company announced a capital investment of around 16.5 m in increasing and modernizing bottling
capacity. A new PET bottling line of 24,000 bottles/hour capacity (4.5 m) and a new glass bottling line
of 20,000 25cl and 33cl bottles/hour capacity (0.8 m) will be installed. In addition, part of the
investment will be allocated for water treatment and energy saving facilities, as well as increasing
number of refrigerators up to 28,000
Knjaz Milos was re-certified ISO 9001 and received two new quality certificates: OHSAS 18001
(Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series) and SRPS ISO 14001:2005 for environment
protection
The company concluded an agreement with local company Frikom to produce innovative Guarana
Energy Ice Cream, winning the Gold Medal in the Agricultural Fair in Novi Sad
Salford investment fund announced intention of selling the company. Pepsi-Cola confirmed in August
negotiations were on the way but later Salford Capital Partners decided to indefinitely postpone the sale
of Knjaz Milos due to instability of global finance market
Knjaz Milos was nominated The best from Serbia by Ministry of Commerce and Services, Serbian
Chamber of Commerce and Economical Review magazine
In September Knjaz Milos acquired the juice brand Moc Prirode (The Power of Nature) from
Agroekonomik. The value of the deal was not disclosed, but the new owner announced investment of
1.5 m in redesigning, re-launching and distribution of the brand
Knjaz Milos organised the campaign Knjaz Milos Quenches thirst, in several Serbian cities to assist
workers in open spaces during hot days
Knjaz Milos withdrew its listings from the Belgrade Stock Exchange in October, 2010.

PDF Editor

DISTRIBUTION
Knjaz Milos has the best nationwide mineral water distribution network. The network includes six distribution
centres in Serbia and one each in Montenegro and Bosnia & Herzegovina (both organised as independent
companies). 60-70% of sales occur in Serbia, with about 10% in Montenegro and 20% in the Autonomous
Province of Vojvodina.
FOREIGN TRADE
Knjaz Milos exports to more than 15 countries, of which the most important markets are Germany, Canada,
Sweden and Australia.

Site
Arandjelovac, East Serbia

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Bulk/HOD Water
Aqua Una
Still mineral
Packaged Water
Carbonated
Knjaz Milos
Regular

Grapefruit/
elderberry,
lemon,
orange/lemon

Capacity
1 x 10,000 bottles/hour, glass - water
1 x 18,000 units/hr, can for 25cl and 33cl
1 x 16,000 units/hr line, glass for 20cl and 25cl nonrefillable with twist caps
1 x 24,000 bottles/hour, glass - water
1 x 18,000 bottles/hour, glass - carbonates
1 x 2,000 bottles/hour, 33cl, 50cl and 150cl PET
2 x 12,000 bottles/hour, 33cl, 50cl and 150cl PET
1 x 200 bottles/hour, 1,890cl PC

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

Still mineral

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

1890

25
33
50
75
100
150
50

25
33
50
75
150
500

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

x
x

x
x

x
x
x
x

150
Still
Aqua Viva

PET
ref
nr

Comment
From KHS,Germany
SASIB, Carbonates and juices
KHS, Mineral water,
carbonates, juice and still drinks
From KHS,Germany
From KHS, Germany
From SASIB, Italy
From SASIB and MAIER

x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

x
x
x
x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Carbonates
Cola
Golf

Cola

50
150

x
x

Orange
Golf

Orange

50
150

x
x

150

Other fruit Flavours


Knjaz Milos
Apple 10%
Spritzer
Juice (100%)
Golf

Orange,
pineapple

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Golf
Apple 50%,
blueberry 30%,
Vitalis (orange/
carrot/ lemon),
ACE orange/
passion fruit/
pineapple/ apple
50%, sour
cherry 35%,
strawberry 40%,
peach 40%,
apricot 35%,
mango/ peach
50%, orange/
pineapple/
passion fruit
ACE 50%
Still Drinks (less than 25%
juice)
Aqua Viva
Peach
Hydroactive
Aqua Viva
Apple
Junior
Aqua Viva
Lemon-lime/
Slim
green tea
Juice-Up
Forest fruits,
orange, apple,
multivitamin
Mila

Wake Up
(guarana/
lemongrass),
Balance (aloe
vera/ melon),
Chillout (herbal
cocktail/ cherry)

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

20

20

PET
ref
nr

75

33

50

50

150
50

x
x

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Golf

Peach

20

Regular
Black

25
25

Energy
Drinks
Guarana

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

x
x

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

185.8

198.4

190.1

174.6

172.6

14.9 %

14.4 %

13.2 %

12.8 %

12.6 %

Packaged Water

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

- Knjaz Milos

137.6

135.6

119.0

103.0

92.4

26.0 %

23.0 %

20.5 %

18.2 %

16.0 %

- Aqua Viva

22.5

35.2

44.3

46.8

50.0

4.3 %

6.0 %

7.6 %

8.2 %

8.7 %

Carbonates

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

- Golf

4.4

6.8

6.2

5.6

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

1.9

7.0

8.7

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

6.2

8.1

5.7 %

8.0 %

0.7

0.6

0.7 %

0.6 %

- Knjaz Milos
Still Drinks

3.6

1.2

- Juice Up
- Aqua Viva
- Golf

3.6

- Mila

0.3

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.0

4.6 %

4.6 %

1.2 %

0.3 %

1.1 %

0.8 %

0.5 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Energy Drinks

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

- Guarana

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

Nectars

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

- Golf

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Sports Drinks

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

- Aqua Viva

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

Juice

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

- Golf

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

- Golf

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

MINAQUA

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Mineral water, carbonates and still drinks

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


In 1999, Minaqua was privatised and now has around 100 shareholders.

COMPANY HISTORY
1897
1911
1945
1972
1999
2000
2006
2007
2008
2009

Company founded
Franc Josef's Water rewarded with the Grand Prix for water quality at fairs in Rome, Paris and London
Mineral water sold nationwide as Mineral Water of Novi Sad
Plant completely modernised
Minaqua brand name launched
Company privatised
Investment in new Krones and SIG bottling lines for water and soft drinks
Quality systems ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001/EN ISO 14001 introduced
The company is HACCP certified
BB Minaqua re-designed packaging for still mineral water and re-branded line as Life Minaqua
In October the company started exports of mineral water to Romania
Minaqua announced plans for a 1.5 m investment in increasing and modernising capacity for bottling
water and soft drinks in the first half of 2009
New warehouse and office building were inaugurated

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Minaqua
Mineral

Still
Life Minaqua

Mineral

Size
In cl

33
50
100
200
33
50
100
200
575

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

x
x
x
x
x
x
x

Carbonates

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Size
In cl

Flavour

Cola
Minaqua
Cherry
Fructo
Tonic, Mixers & Bitters
Minaqua
Tonic
Fructo
Orange
Minaqua
Mandarin
Fructo
Lemon
Minaqua
Fructo
Still Drinks (less than 25%
juice)
Jodi
Apple, cherry

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

200

200

200

200

50

Other
Plastic

PVC

Can

Carton

Million Litres

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

125.4

139.6

134.7

109.2

114.8

10.0 %

10.1 %

9.3 %

8.0 %

8.4 %

Packaged Water

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

- Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Still Drinks

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

- Jodi

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

Carbonates

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

- Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

NECTAR

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Packaged water, juice, nectars, still drinks, squash/syrups, iced/rtd tea, energy drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


100% privately owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
1976
1989
1998
2001
2002
2003

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009
2010

Heba spring discovered and a 6 m litre per annum bottling plant was built
PET packaging launched. Bottling capacity increased to 120 m litres per annum
Nectar was founded and first packaging line for carton packs installed
Heba was admitted into the national program 'Healthy Food - Green Apple', receiving the Green Apple
quality certificate
Heba added the still spring water, Heba Ekovoda, to its portfolio
Nectar purchased the new factory in Vladicin Han. It was the biggest factory in the region for production
of fruit concentrates
Heba entered the bulk/HOD water market with Heba Ekovoda in 1500cl PET
New bottling lines became operational; increasing total annual capacity of 300 m litres
150cl carton packaging launched
Launch of Nectar Plus
Launch of Nectar Life
Nectar innovated and expanded packaging portfolio: introducing products in PET packing and metal
cans
Heba underwent privatisation
Launch of Nectar Life Organic
Nectar HACCP certificate obtained. Heba is in the process of obtaining HACCP certificate and ISO9001
Nectar signed a 10 m credit agreement with EBRD to facilitate increased production and the
penetration of new markets (Romania, Bulgaria)
Improvement of distribution network: direct delivery and distribution centres established in Belgrade,
Backa Palanka, Cacak and Nis
Nectar acquired local company Budunost, for RSD640 m plus obligation to invest at least RSD27 m
Budunost will produce raw material for Nectar, including tomato
Nectar acquired 70% of mineral water producer Heba from the Serbian privatisation agency, for 2.5 m
plus 6 m to cover the company's liabilities
Nectar changed the company logo as part of its improved identity
The company launched an innovative nutraceutical nectar with soy and also launched Nectar Life
Unique 100% juice (not from concentrate)

PDF Editor

Site
Heba Bujanovac

Capacity
1 x 12,000 litres/hour, PET
1 x 10,000 litres/hour, glass
1 x 3,600 litres/hour, 50cl and 150cl
PET, including equipment for
manufacturing PET bottles from
granules
1 x 10,000 units/hour, 50cl and 150cl
PET

Comment
KHS
Origin Sidel, France

From Italy

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Production and distribution of fruit purees and concentrates. Also produces alcoholic beverages, preserves,
tomato sauces and vinegar.

FOREIGN TRADE
Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, Slovenia, Russia, Australia, Canada, USA and various EU countries.

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Heba
Mineral water
Still
Heba
Heba
Ekovoda

Mineral water
Table water

Size
In cl

50
100
150
50
100
150
50

Glass
rb
nr

Apple, orange,
strawberry,
multivitamin,
blueberry,
blackberry,
apple/peach,
sour cherry
Apple, orange
Blueberry,
peach, apple,
orange

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Bulk

x
x
x
x
x

150
500
Bulk
Juice (100%)
Nectar Life

PET
ref
nr

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x
x

20

25
25

PDF Editor

x
x

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Nectar Life
Organic
Nectar Life
Unique
Nectar Kids

Nectar

Flavour
Apple, orange,
orange with
pulp, peach,
tomato,
strawberry, pear
multivitamin,
pineapple,
blueberry, sour
cherry,
blackberry
Apple

Raspberry
Apple, orange,
apple/pear,
strawberry,
peach + calcium
and ACDE
Apple, peach,
multivitamin,
orange

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Nectar Family Pineapple 50%,
blueberry 30%,
peach 50%,
apple 50%,
strawberry 50%,
apricot 50%,
sour cherry 50%,
fruit mix 30%
Pineapple 50%,
blueberry 30%,
peach 50%,
quince 50%,
apple 50%,
strawberry 50%,
apricot 50%,
sour cherry 50%,
orange 50%,
fruit mix 30%
Apple 50%,
apricot 50%
orange 50%,
sour cherry 30%,
fruit mix 30%,
blueberry 30%,
strawberry 50%,
tropic 30%,
peach 50%

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

100

20

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

25
100
100

x
x
x

20

150

20

100

150

PDF Editor

[1]

Segment/
Brand
Nectar Plus
Fit

Nectar Plus
(+ vitamins)

Nectar Plus
Antistress

Nectar Plus
Antistress 2

Vocne Kapi

Flavour
orange/pink
grapefruit,
pineapple,
lemon, ginger
50%

Blackberry 30%
Pineapple/
orange,
mango/white
grape
Pineapple/
orange,
pomegranate/
apple, mango/
white grape,
blackberry 30%,
red grape 50%
Carrot/fruit mix

Apple, red
grape,
blackberry,
blackcurrant
with chamomile
and lemon balm
extracts 50%

Peach, apple,
forest fruits,
tropical
Forest fruits,
apple,
peach/apple,
tropical

Still Drinks (less than 25%


juice)
Fun
Multivitamin, red
multivitamin,
green apple,
apple, orange
Vocne Kapi

Peach, other
fruit

Size
In cl
20

Glass
rb
nr
x

25
50
100
20

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

x
x
x
x

50

100

20
25
33
50
100
20

x
x
x
x
x
x

25
50
100
100

x
x
x
x

200
150

x
x

50

150
150

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

Squash/Syrups
Nectar (1+6)
Apple, lemon,
orange

100

Nectar Plus

100

20
50

Apple,
blackberry
lemon,
raspberry
orange, sour
cherry

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Nectar
Peach, lemon
Peach, lemon,
strawberry
Peach
Peach, lemon,
strawberry
Energy
Drinks
Booster
Pink Up

150
150

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

x
x

x
x

25
25

[1] Nectar trademark renamed Nectar Family in 2009

PDF Editor

x
x

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

64.4

70.3

84.9

96.6

88.5

5.1 %

5.1 %

5.9 %

7.1 %

6.5 %

Nectars

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

- Nectar

40.1

43.5

42.4

31.7

29.7

27.9 %

28.8 %

24.7 %

19.9 %

21.6 %

11.9

10.8

10.3

6.9 %

6.8 %

7.5 %

Packaged Water

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Heba

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

- Vocne Kapi

Juice

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

- Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

Squash/Syrups

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

- Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

- Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Energy Drinks

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

- Booster

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

3.4 %

3.7 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

3.5 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

0.7 %

0.0 %

- Pink Up
- Top Power (Nectar)

0.1

0.0

Still Drinks

8.4

6.8

- Vocne Kapi

9.4

4.4

0.1

3.8

3.6

0.1

0.8

0.0

- Fun
- Mambo

1.0

- Twister
- Nectar

0.9 %

0.2 %

10.6 %

6.8 %

1.3 %
6.8

7.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

5.6

6.8 %
9.3 %

5.2 %

PALANACKI KISELJAK

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Active in packaged water and carbonates.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


Istrabenz d.d. (Istrabenz).

COMPANY HISTORY
1719
1953
1968
1996
1995
2000
2002

2003

2005
2007
2008

2009
2010

2010

Spring recorded for the first time


Cockta launched
Production and bottling of mineral sparkling water and carbonates commenced
Cockta acquired by Sloveniavino
Production of Vivo carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks started
Kolinska acquired Cockta brand from Sloveniavino
Kolinska acquired a 74.78% share in Palanacki Kiseljak
Company focused entirely on packaged water, opening a new 1.8 m production facility, doubling
production to 4,500 litres per hour
Kolinska's investment enabled new plant to be built on a green-field site at the same location as the
sugar syrup preparation plant. An 8,000 bph bottling line was installed to produce Cockta and Jupi
(under licence) and the Yu local carbonates range
Kolinska merged with Droga, Cockta, Jupi and Yu owned by newly formed company Droga Kolinska
Istrabenz acquired Droga Kolinska
Serbian food processing company Centroproizvod expressed interest in buying Slovenian Droga
Kolinska, owner of Palanacki Kiseljak, allegedly for 150 m, with a state contribution. Droga Kolinska
denied rumours
Istrabenz, owner of Droga Kolinska declared insolvency
Croatian Atlantic Grupa, owner of Cedevita and Multivita, launched a bid for Slovenian Droga Kolinska,
majority owner of Palanacki Kiseljak
Droga Kolinska signed an agreement with Terra Productie Indjija with cooperation of Ball Packaging to
start canning Cockta cola in 25cl slim can. The 11 m production line has a capacity of 300,000 cans
per hour
Atlantic Grupa bought Droga Kolinska, with its companies Palanacki Kiseljak (Cockta bottler and water
producer), Grand (coffee) and Soko Stark (foods) for 382 ( 150 m net debt included) in July 2010.

PACKAGING
Mainly PET production, with only a sixth of production packed in glass.

FOREIGN TRADE
Company exports products to Canada, USA and markets within European Union.

PDF Editor

Site
Smederevo Palanka

Segment/
Brand

Capacity
1 x 10,000 litres/hour, 100cl glass
1 x 3,800 units/hour, 50cl and150cl PET

Size
In cl

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Karadorde

25
50
75
150

Still
Karadorde

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

Orange
Jupi

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

x
x
x

50
150
200
575

Carbonates
Cola
Cockta

Other
Plastic

PVC

Comment
From Germany
From Italy

x
x
x
x

25
50
150
200

25
50
200

x
x
x
x
x

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

23.1

24.5

27.3

24.7

29.2

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

Carbonates

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

- Cockta

10.6

12.8

16.5

15.2

19.0

2.5 %

2.8 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.3 %

- Jupi

0.6

0.3

0.2

0.2

1.3

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.3 %

- Yu

0.6

0.6

0.1 %

0.1 %

Packaged Water

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

- Karadorde

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

RODIC MB

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Rodic is primarily active in the carbonates market, but is also one of the country's most important brewers.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


Privately owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
1992 Rodic entered the retail market
1994 Rodic launched Frutella, entering the carbonates market
1998 Company installed the Sumak bottling line with 2,000 litres per hour capacity
Capacity increased with the addition of an Italian bottling line of 2,000 bph for 200cl PET
Gerosa plus Sipa blowing equipment installed, increasing capacity to 4,000 bph
Bottling of syrups in 100cl non-refillable glass began
1999 A new Italian, 2,500 bph, filling line for 200cl PET was installed
Soft drinks production shut down during bombardments
Bottling of 85cl PET syrups started and 100cl non-refillable glass discontinued
2000 Company suffered quality problems with Frutella. The brand was discontinued for nine months while the
necessary technology and recipes are revised
2001 Syrups production capacity increased
New Krones bottling lines for 150cl and 200cl PET, with 9,000, 11,000 and 18,000 bph capacity, were
installed for Aqua Bella mineral water and Frutella
Production of alcoholic beverages discontinued
York chilling facility installed
2002 Sipa bottling line, with 4,000 bph capacity, installed for 200cl PET
Aqua Bella packaging re-designed
2003 A KHS filling line installed for Aqua Bella and Frutella in 33cl (14,000 bph), 70cl, 150cl (20,000 bph) and
200cl (10,000 bph) PET
Pall filtration station installed
Krones bottling line, with a 13,000 bph capacity, installed for 200cl PET.
The company entered the beer market
2006 Aermak chilling facility installed
New bottling plant opened
Syrups production capacity reconstructed and increased
Stork (parent company) received ISO 9001/2000 certification
2007 The company announced the reorganisation of all Rodics products (Frutella soft drinks, Aqua Bella
mineral water and MB beer) produced under the MBBB company trademark (MB Bottling Business)
Rodic Brewery acquired by Heineken (subject to the regulatory approvals)
2008 Fru still drink launched in 50cl and 150cl PET.
2010 Rodic again entered the retail business by opening a new Hypermarket Hype Cort in December 2010.
At the beginning of 2011, this was sold to DIS-local retail chain

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Trading of petroleum, foodstuffs and retail commodities and the production of food and drinks. Also has
involvement in retail, hotels and restaurants, transport and distribution.

PDF Editor

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Aqua Bella
Mineral

Still
Aqua Bella

Carbonates
Cola
Frutella

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Frutella
Tonic
Bitter lemon
Other Non-Fruit Flavours
Alpela
Orange
Frutella

Still Drinks (less than 25%


juice)
Frutella
Orange

Squash/Syrups
Frutella
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Frutella
Peach

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

33
70
150
200

x
x
x
x

33
70
150
200

x
x
x
x

33
70
150
200

x
x
x
x

150
200

x
x

33
150
200

x
x
x

33
70
150
200

x
x
x
x

33
150
200
150

x
x
x
x

85
Bulk

33
150
200

x
x
x

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

105.3

103.0

98.1

86.5

67.5

8.4 %

7.5 %

6.8 %

6.3 %

4.9 %

Carbonates

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

- Frutella

68.4

64.4

58.5

53.1

32.3

16.3 %

14.2 %

12.0 %

12.2 %

7.3 %

- Alpela

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.7

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Packaged Water

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

- Aqua Bella

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Still Drinks

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

- Frutella

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

Squash/Syrups

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

- Frutella

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

- Frutella

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Total

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

SWISSLION-TAKOVO

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Primarily active in the juice, nectars and squash/syrups markets.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


In 2004, Takovo was acquired by Swisslion and became Swisslion-Takovo. Previously the company was
100% socially owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
1922 Company established.
1962 Company was renamed Takovo
2004 Takovo was privatised, acquired by Swisslion and renamed Swisslion-Takovo
Swisslion also owns Miloduh (acquired 1998)
2008 Swisslion-Takovo acquired Croatian company Euro Food Markt, which will allow development of
Swisslion's brands and production of various products of this company on the Croatian market. The
acquisition price is estimated at 20 m, including the 10 m mandatory investment by the end of 2008

PRODUCTION INGREDIENTS
Mostly own production. Swisslion-Takovo is a major producer of fruit products.

DISTRIBUTION
The company has warehouses in Gornji Milanovac, Novi Sad, Nis and Belgrade, plus over forty retail and
fourteen discount outlets.

PACKAGING
Carton for juice (Tetra Pak has a plant in the same town). Glass is acquired from local factory in Paracin; some
volume is imported.

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Spirits, fruit pures, fresh fruit, products based on cream, chocolate and wild mushrooms, ketchups, bakery
products, cattle breeding.

PDF Editor

FOREIGN TRADE
Swisslion-Takovo exports carton packed juices and juice-based drinks.

Site
Gornji Milanovac, Radovana Grbovica
bb

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Juice
(100%)
Takovo

Apple, orange,
apricot, peach,
tomato
Apple, orange,
quince/apple,
pineapple,
apricot, peach,
blackberry

Nectars (25-99% juice)


Takovo
Orange, peach,
blueberry,
50% apricot,
peach, orange,
strawberry,
apple/peach,
cocktail,
orange/peach
Tomato, carrot,
pear, peach,
sour cherry,
blueberry
Squash/Syrups
Takovo

Size
In cl

Capacity
100cl glass

Comment
Syrups and juices

100cl carton (largely Tetra Pak)

Juice and fruit drinks

Other
Plastic

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Can

Carton

20

100

20

20

100

30

PDF Editor

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

14.8

14.8

12.4

9.3

9.1

1.2 %

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Squash/Syrups

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

- Takovo

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Total

Nectars

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

- Takovo

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

Juice

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

- Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

UNIJA DISTRIBUTERA SRBIJE

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Carbonates

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


A joint venture between distributors from 8 provinces of Serbia

COMPANY HISTORY
Unija Distributera Srbije is a strong distribution company founded as the buying group, of several local
distribution companies. Today, there are 8 distribution centres: Zrenjanin; Novi Sad; Kovin; Beograd; abac;
Uice; Parain; Ni.
Sinalco International GmbH & Co Germany withdrew the bottling licence granted to Si&Si due to liquidity
problems. Sinalco licence for Serbia and Montenegro was bought by Unija distributera Srbije for 0.5 m.

Segment/
Brand
Carbonates
Cola
Sinalco
Cola Mix
Sinalco

Flavour

Regular

Cola/orange

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Sinalco
Tonic, bitter
lemon
Orange
Sinalco
Sinalco
Rosso

Size
In g

25
33
200

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

x
x
x

200

150

25
33
200
200

x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

VINO ZUPA

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Non-carbonated soft drinks.

ULTIMATE OWNER/MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS


100% privately owned.

COMPANY HISTORY
1956
1962
1967
2002
2003

2004
2005
2006

2008

2009

2010

Vino Zupa was founded


The first fruit juice plant was set up
A new juice and juice concentrate factory became operational
The company was privatised
La Vita juice and nectars brand was launched
A modern refrigeration plant for reception and storage of fresh fruit with a capacity of 1,300 tonnes was
set up.
First TP line, with a capacity of 7,000 units per hour, was installed for 20cl, 50cl and 100cl cartons
A refrigeration plant with a capacity of 4000t was bought in Brus
Second TP line, with a 7,000 units per hour capacity, was installed for 20cl, 50cl, 100cl and 150cl
cartons
An agreement for the distribution of Vino Zupa brands was signed with Agroekonomic
Glass bottling line installed
Vino Zupa introduced a system of quality and safety management in accordance with JUS ISO
9001/2001 standards and recommended international code of practice general principles of food
hygiene CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev.4 2003
Another refrigeration plant with a capacity of 1700 tonnes was built in the first half of 2006.
The company purchased in September the majority stake in the Macedonian winery Povardarje from
Negotin on the Skopian stock exchange for 163,000 and took over all managerial positions. Vino Zupa
had to cover about 4 m of winery debts
The company was extended by acquisition of Hepok plant in Mostar and Amko Comerc in Sarajevo.
The company installed a new production line AsepsystemS with a processing capacity of ten tonnes
per hour of fresh fruit or obtaining fruit purees and puree concentrates from the following fruit: apple,
pear, strawberry, raspberry, blackberry, pear, plum, and sour cherry
The company ran four Tetra Flex lines with a capacity of 600,000 cartons of 20cl, 33cl, 50cl, 100cl,
150cl or 200cl
The first PET line worth 0.5 m was installed. The two production lines will be used for bottling
carbonated soft drinks (50cl and 200cl PET) and still drinks (50cl and 150cl PET)
Vino Zupa announced plans to invest an additional 1 m in a new 8,000 litres per hour bottling line for
soft drinks production, to be finalised by the end of the year
Vino Zupa acquired Agroekonomik Blace, a local refrigeration company for freezing fruits and
vegetables, in September 2010.

NON-SOFT DRINKS INTERESTS


Production of wine, fruit preserves and pickles.

PDF Editor

FOREIGN TRADE
Vino Zupa is one of the strongest exporters in the region, especially to Bosnia & Herzegovina and Macedonia.

Site

Segment/
Brand
Juice
(100%)
La Vita

La Vita 5
(ACDE+Ca)

Capacity
1 TP x 7,000 uph 20cl, 50cl, 100cl
1 TP x 7,000 uph 20cl, 50cl, 100cl, 150cl
1 glass line
1 glass line

Flavour

Orange, apple,
multivitamin,
tomato
Apple, orange,
pineapple/apple,
peach/apple,
multivitamin, wild
berries ACE,
tomato
Apple, orange,
strawberry/apple,
peach/apple, wild
berries

Nectars (25-99% juice)


La Vita 52%
Cranberry, red
grape,
pineapple/apple
Raspberry,
quince, blueberry
Sour cherry,
lemonade,
Yellow cocktail,
red cocktail,
orange, apple,
orange/carrot/
apple
Apricot
Blackcurrant/red
grape, peach,
strawberry
Pear/apple.
orange/apple

Size
In cl

20

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Comment
Installed in 2004
Installed in 2005
For syrups
Installed in 2006 for 20cl juice and nectars

Can

Carton

100

100

20

20

100
20

100
20

20
100
20

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

x
x
x
x

x
x

100
100

PDF Editor

x
x
x
x
x

Bulk

Notes

Segment/
Brand
La Vita
Classic

La Vita
Happy

Flavour
Apple, peach,
carrot/orange
apple, orange,
yellow cocktail,
red cocktail,
orange/apple,
multivitamin,
sour cherry,
blackcurrant/
red grape
Blackberry, pear,
raspberry,
cranberry,
strawberry

Still Drinks (less than 25%


juice)
La Vita
Orange,
multivitamin,
blueberry,
blackberry 8%
Squash/Syrups
La Vita (1:6)
Apple, sour
cherry, orange
lemon,
raspberry,
blueberry,
blackcurrant
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
La Vita
Peach, lemon

Size
In cl

Glass
rb
nr

PET
ref
nr

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

200

200

150

100

20

PDF Editor

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

19.2

33.8

47.1

52.3

42.2

1.5 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

3.8 %

3.1 %

Nectars

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

- La Vita

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

Still Drinks

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

- La Vita

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Juice

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

- La Vita

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

Squash/Syrups

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

- La Vita

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Iced/RTD Tea Drinks

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

- La Vita

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

VODA VRNJCI

PRINCIPAL BEVERAGE ACTIVITY


Voda Vrnjci is primarily involved in the packaged water market, but is also active in carbonates and still drinks.

COMPANY HISTORY
1970
1976
1997
2000
2004
2005

Company was founded


Frutella still drinks and Vrnjci carbonates range launched
First (Sidel and Krones) PET lines, with a capacity of 6,000 bph, were installed for 50cl and 150cl
Company doubled capacity with a 6,000 bph bottling line for 200cl PET
Bottling line, with a capacity of 16,000 bph, added for 25cl, 50cl, 70cl and 100cl glass bottles.
Company was privatised and acquired by Exrapet
A line for 500cl PET bottle added
2006 Company invested 3.5 m in three new springs in order to exploit good quality water
Company gained HACCAP and ISO 9001 certification

DISTRIBUTION
Distribution centres in Belgrade, Novi Sad, Nis, Subotica, Kragujevac and Cacak.

FOREIGN TRADE
Primary export market is Bosnia & Herzegovina. Other export markets include Montenegro, Austria, Germany,
Canada, USA and Australia.

Site
Vrnjacka Banja

Capacity
Sidel: 6,000 bph 50cl and 150cl PET
Krones: 12,000 bph 50cl, 150cl and 200cl PET
1 x 16,000 bph 25cl and 100cl glass
1 x 5,000 bph 500cl PET

PDF Editor

Comment
Installed in 1997
Installed in 2000
Installed in 2004
Installed in 2006

Segment/
Brand

Flavour

Packaged Water
Carbonated
Vrnjci

Vrnjci

Low carbonation

Still
Vrnjci

Carbonates
Cola
Vrnjci Frutela

Lemon-lime
Vrnjci Fiz

25
50
100
150
200
25
50
150
200

Glass
rb
nr

Regular

Regular

Regular

Other Fruit Flavours


Vrnjci Frutela
Tropical

Still Drinks (less than 25% juice)


Vrnjci Frutela
Orange

50
100
150
200
50
100
150
200
50
100
150
200
50
100
150
200
50
100
150
200
50
150
200

PET
ref
nr

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

25
50
200
500

Tonic, Mixers & Bitters


Vrnjci Frutela
Tonic

Orange
Vrnjci Frutela

Size
In cl

x
x
x
x

x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

PDF Editor

PVC

Other
Plastic

Can

Carton

Pouch/
Sachet/
Tub/
Drum

Bulk

Notes

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

69.4

92.7

100.1

116.7

123.2

5.6 %

6.7 %

6.9 %

8.5 %

9.0 %

Packaged Water

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

- Vrncji

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Carbonates

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

- Vrncji

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

Still Drinks

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

- Frutela

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1250.1

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

250.1

295.8

320.9

321.2

335.1

20.0 %

21.4 %

22.2 %

23.5 %

24.5 %

Knjaz Milos

185.8

198.4

190.1

174.6

172.6

14.9 %

14.4 %

13.2 %

12.8 %

12.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

69.4

92.7

100.1

116.7

123.2

5.6 %

6.7 %

6.9 %

8.5 %

9.0 %

125.4

139.6

134.7

109.2

114.8

10.0 %

10.1 %

9.3 %

8.0 %

8.4 %

Nectar

64.4

70.3

84.9

96.6

88.5

5.2 %

5.1 %

5.9 %

7.1 %

6.5 %

PepsiCo

66.3

72.3

87.7

66.1

70.3

5.3 %

5.2 %

6.1 %

4.8 %

5.1 %

Rodic

105.3

103.0

98.1

86.5

67.5

8.4 %

7.5 %

6.8 %

6.3 %

4.9 %

Fruvita

32.0

42.0

49.6

64.0

55.9

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

4.7 %

4.1 %

Vino Zupa

19.2

33.8

47.1

52.3

42.2

1.5 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

3.8 %

3.1 %

Sinalco

31.2

35.3

47.7

33.9

29.7

2.5 %

2.6 %

3.3 %

2.5 %

2.2 %

Droga Kolinska

23.1

24.5

27.3

24.7

29.2

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

25.5

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

1.0 %

1.9 %

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

1.9 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

Atlantic Grupa

8.0

10.6

16.4

17.2

18.4

0.6 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Rauch

5.5

9.5

13.0

13.7

16.7

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.2 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

1.0 %

3.5

5.4

8.7

11.6

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

0.2 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

Total

Minaqua

Bahus
Planinka

Agrokor
Nestle
Swisslion

18.6

14.8

12.4

9.3

9.1

1.5 %

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Arteska International

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

2.1 %

1.6 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

2.9

5.2

7.8

9.4

7.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.5 %

16.2

13.0

8.3

7.7

5.9

1.3 %

0.9 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

4.3

3.5

3.6

3.7

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

IB Team
Bip Belgrade

Elixir Natura D.o.o.


Agroekonomik
Metro

2.4
23.7

19.6

13.8

3.9

2.0

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

PDF Editor

0.2 %
1.9 %

1.4 %

1.0 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.4

0.4

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Unilever
Carlsberg Group
Pivovarna Lasko

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Parksystem

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

1.6

0.0

0.1 %

0.0 %

4.8 %

4.6 %

A-BInBev
A&P

0.0

0.0 %

Bambi

2.8

2.5

Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

Heba

43.4

InBev

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

41.8

39.4

3.5 %

3.0 %

2.7 %

5.9

4.4

2.3

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Meridjian

1.8

0.8

0.4

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

0.2 %

0.2 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

0.0 %

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.0 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

Others

54.9

0.3

0.4

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

3.9 %

3.5 %

0.0 %
54.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

51.1

65.7

63.1

4.4 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

1250.1

1381.5

1444.1

1369.2

1368.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

IBP

188.0

224.1

237.8

237.5

244.1

15.0 %

16.2 %

16.5 %

17.3 %

17.8 %

Knjaz Milos

185.8

198.4

190.1

174.1

171.9

14.9 %

14.4 %

13.2 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

69.4

92.8

100.1

116.7

134.9

5.6 %

6.7 %

6.9 %

8.5 %

9.9 %

125.4

139.6

134.7

109.2

114.8

10.0 %

10.1 %

9.3 %

8.0 %

8.4 %

A&P

66.3

72.3

87.7

66.9

71.4

5.3 %

5.2 %

6.1 %

4.9 %

5.2 %

Rodic

105.3

103.0

98.1

86.5

67.5

8.4 %

7.5 %

6.8 %

6.3 %

4.9 %

Vlasinka

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.2 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

Fruvita

32.0

42.0

49.6

64.0

55.9

2.6 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

4.7 %

4.1 %

Nectar

64.4

70.3

84.9

60.8

53.7

5.1 %

5.1 %

5.9 %

4.4 %

3.9 %

Vino Zupa

19.2

33.8

47.1

52.3

42.2

1.5 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

3.8 %

3.1 %

Heba

43.4

41.8

39.4

35.8

34.8

3.5 %

3.0 %

2.7 %

2.6 %

2.5 %

Fresh & Co

30.2

29.8

36.1

32.4

30.1

2.4 %

2.2 %

2.5 %

2.4 %

2.2 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

23.1

24.5

27.3

24.7

29.2

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

2.1 %

Total

Minaqua

Unija Distributera Srbije


Planinka
Rauch

28.1

2.1 %

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

1.9 %

1.8 %

1.6 %

1.7 %

1.7 %

5.5

9.5

13.0

13.7

18.0

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.3 %

14.2

14.9

1.0 %

1.1 %

Bahus
Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

0.6 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

1.0 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

1.0 %

2.4

7.9

12.0

0.2 %

0.6 %

0.9 %

CCHBC
Swisslion Takovo

14.8

14.8

12.4

9.3

9.1

1.2 %

1.1 %

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

IB Team

2.9

6.0

8.7

11.2

9.1

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.8 %

0.7 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

8.0

7.0

7.8

8.1

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

Voda Voda

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

2.1 %

1.6 %

1.0 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

3.5

5.4

5.9

7.0

0.3 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.5 %

21.9

19.5

15.5

7.7

5.9

1.8 %

1.4 %

1.1 %

0.6 %

0.4 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.4 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

3.1

2.9

4.1

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.3 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

0.3 %

Jamnica
Bip Belgrade

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Agroekonomik

23.7

19.6

13.8

3.9

2.0

1.9 %

1.4 %

1.0 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

31.2

35.3

47.7

33.9

1.7

2.5 %

2.6 %

3.3 %

2.5 %

0.1 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.3

0.9

1.2

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

0.0 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Carlsberg Serbia
Pivovarna Union

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Pivara Vrsac

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Apatinska Pivara

5.9

4.4

2.3

1.6

0.0

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Bambi

2.8

2.5

0.2 %

0.2 %

Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Meridjian

1.8

0.8

0.4

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

0.0 %

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.0 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.0 %

0.0 %

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

0.0 %

Swisslion Miloduh

3.8

0.3 %
3.7 %

3.3 %

4.5 %

4.3 %

Others

54.9

0.3

0.4

50.7

47.7

0.0 %

61.8

58.8

4.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Coca-Cola

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

35.8

34.8

6.3 %

6.0 %

Nectar

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

2.0

3.0

6.0

8.0

0.3 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

Bip Belgrade

2.1

2.3

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

Bambi

2.8

2.5

0.5 %

0.4 %

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

Others

10.5

14.5

17.6

2.0 %

2.5 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Droga Kolinska
Agrokor
Arteska International

0.0 %

30.6

25.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

528.7

588.7

579.5

567.1

576.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

160.1

170.9

163.3

149.8

142.4

30.3 %

29.0 %

28.2 %

26.4 %

24.7 %

Minaqua

119.2

131.8

128.4

107.3

113.0

22.5 %

22.4 %

22.2 %

18.9 %

19.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

56.8

78.6

82.7

101.8

108.4

10.7 %

13.3 %

14.3 %

18.0 %

18.8 %

Vlasinka

31.9

41.8

46.8

50.2

58.7

6.0 %

7.1 %

8.1 %

8.9 %

10.2 %

Heba

40.4

40.2

38.6

35.8

34.8

7.6 %

6.8 %

6.7 %

6.3 %

6.0 %

Planinka

23.6

24.8

23.5

22.7

23.4

4.5 %

4.2 %

4.1 %

4.0 %

4.1 %

Rodic

16.9

18.1

18.7

17.8

18.6

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

3.1 %

3.2 %

Bivoda

7.0

8.2

9.2

11.1

13.6

1.3 %

1.4 %

1.6 %

1.9 %

2.4 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.3

10.8

10.6

9.4

8.9

2.1 %

1.8 %

1.8 %

1.7 %

1.5 %

Voda Voda

25.8

21.6

14.7

9.7

7.5

4.9 %

3.7 %

2.5 %

1.7 %

1.3 %

Naftagaz

4.8

7.1

6.9

4.2

5.4

0.9 %

1.2 %

1.2 %

0.7 %

0.9 %

Vrnjacko Vrelo

7.6

6.2

6.1

4.7

5.2

1.4 %

1.1 %

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Mivela

3.3

3.2

2.9

2.8

4.7

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.5 %

0.8 %

Vujic Voda

4.6

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.9

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

0.7 %

2.0

3.0

3.2

3.3

0.3 %

0.5 %

0.6 %

0.6 %

2.2

1.9

0.1

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.5 %

0.4 %

3.0 %

5.4 %

4.3 %

Jamnica
Bip Belgrade

2.1

2.3

Bambi

2.8

2.5

Rada, Montenegro

0.1

Others

10.5

0.0 %
14.5

17.6

30.6

25.0

2.0 %

2.5 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Ekofarm

4.3

2.5

2.6

1.1

1.2

28.2 %

13.2 %

9.8 %

4.0 %

3.6 %

1.7

1.1

6.0 %

3.3 %

Total

Nectar
Vrnjacko Vrelo

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2

0.3

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

0.3 %

0.2 %

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

Arteska International

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Others

0.5

0.2

0.1

3.4 %

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.1

0.1

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

15.1

19.2

26.7

27.6

33.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

0.5

2.5

8.1

12.9

16.3

3.2 %

13.2 %

30.5 %

46.7 %

48.2 %

La Fantana

4.0

10.8

12.5

11.0

14.1

26.5 %

56.1 %

46.9 %

39.9 %

41.7 %

Heba

1.7

2.0

2.0

1.7

1.1

10.9 %

10.2 %

7.4 %

6.0 %

3.3 %

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2 %

1.5 %

2.3 %

2.1 %

1.0

1.0

0.4

0.5

5.3 %

3.9 %

1.6 %

1.4 %

Total

Vrnjacko Vrelo
Strategic Trade
Distribution

and

1.7

PDF Editor

11.3 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Zdrava Voda

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.2

0.3

5.5 %

4.7 %

3.5 %

0.9 %

1.0 %

Voda Voda

3.4

0.3

0.0

22.3 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

Others

3.1

1.7

1.7

20.3 %

8.8 %

6.3 %

2.7 %

2.3 %

0.7

0.8

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

PepsiCo

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

Sinalco

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

28.1

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

6.3 %

Droga Kolinska

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.5

16.6

14.4

14.8

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

3.3 %

Bahus

10.6

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

Elixir Natura D.o.o.

10.4

2.4 %
1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

1.1

2.3 %
0.2 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

1.6

0.0

0.4 %

0.0 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

A-BInBev
InBev

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1

0.1

0.0 %

0.0 %

Jagodinska Pivara
A&P

0.0

Meridjian

0.3

0.1

20.4

10.8

Others

0.0 %

8.3

7.3

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

9.8

0.1 %

0.0 %

4.9 %

2.4 %

1.7 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

418.8

454.0

487.1

435.7

444.4

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

IBP

188.0

223.8

237.5

237.0

244.1

44.9 %

49.3 %

48.7 %

54.4 %

54.9 %

A&P

66.2

71.8

87.0

66.0

70.0

15.8 %

15.8 %

17.9 %

15.1 %

15.7 %

Rodic

69.8

65.7

60.0

54.6

34.1

16.7 %

14.5 %

12.3 %

12.5 %

7.7 %

Unija Distributera Srbije

28.1

6.3 %

Voda Vrnjci

12.2

13.6

16.7

14.4

26.5

2.9 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.3 %

6.0 %

Palanacki Kiseljack

11.8

13.7

16.7

15.4

20.3

2.8 %

3.0 %

3.4 %

3.5 %

4.6 %

Knjaz Milos

4.4

6.8

6.4

5.7

10.4

1.1 %

1.5 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

2.3 %

Minaqua

4.0

5.5

3.9

1.0

0.9

1.0 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

Bip Belgrade

3.7

2.4

1.6

0.6

0.4

0.9 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Apatinska Pivara

4.3

4.2

2.2

1.6

0.0

1.0 %

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

Si & Si (Sinalco)

30.6

33.9

46.1

32.2

7.3 %

7.5 %

9.5 %

7.4 %

Heba

3.1

1.6

0.7

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Meridjian

0.3

0.1

0.1 %

0.0 %

20.4

10.8

4.9 %

2.4 %

Others

8.3

7.3

9.8

1.7 %

1.7 %

2.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Coca-Cola

5.9

8.3

7.9

7.9

7.5

21.1 %

27.6 %

25.2 %

29.4 %

29.0 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Total

Rauch
Swisslion

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Fruvita

0.8

0.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

2.9 %

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

IB Team

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.8

1.0 %

1.1 %

2.6 %

2.9 %

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1

0.0

0.4 %

0.0 %

Knjaz Milos

1.3

Metro
Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

Bip Belgrade

0.5

0.3

0.1

PDF Editor

4.6 %

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Million Litres
2006

2007

2008

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

0.0

Others

1.4

1.4

2.8

% Share
2009

2.7

2010

2.6

2006

2007

2008

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

5.1 %

4.7 %

9.1 %

2009

2010

10.0 %

10.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

27.9

30.3

31.1

26.8

25.8

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fresh & Co

5.9

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.5

21.1 %

26.6 %

24.1 %

27.9 %

29.0 %

Nectar

9.5

11.9

12.9

7.9

7.5

33.9 %

39.3 %

41.4 %

29.5 %

29.0 %

1.0

1.2

1.5

1.6

3.4 %

3.8 %

5.7 %

6.2 %

Total

Rauch
Swisslion Takovo

2.1

1.3

1.1

1.3

1.5

7.6 %

4.2 %

3.5 %

4.8 %

5.7 %

Fruvita

0.8

0.3

1.3

1.4

1.4

2.9 %

1.0 %

4.2 %

5.2 %

5.4 %

Vino Zupa

2.5

1.5

1.2

1.1

1.3

9.0 %

4.8 %

3.7 %

4.3 %

5.0 %

Duga Fruit

0.4

0.2

1.2

1.2

1.2 %

0.6 %

4.6 %

4.5 %

IB Team

0.3

0.4

0.9

0.9

1.0 %

1.4 %

3.2 %

3.6 %

Knjaz Milos

1.3

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.6

4.6 %

3.2 %

3.3 %

3.4 %

2.2 %

Agroekonomik

3.7

2.6

1.1

0.1

0.0

13.4 %

8.7 %

3.5 %

0.4 %

0.0 %

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.0

0.9 %

1.1 %

1.6 %

0.0 %

9.6 %

9.5 %

IBP
Bip Belgrade

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.6 %

0.9 %

0.3 %

Meridjian

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.7 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Others

1.4

1.4

2.7

5.1 %

4.7 %

8.7 %

2.6

2.4

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

IB Team

2.9

4.9

7.4

8.7

6.2

2.0 %

3.2 %

4.3 %

5.4 %

4.5 %

Swisslion

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

Fruvita
Coca-Cola

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Duga Fruit

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.1

3.7

3.0

2.4

2.5

4.3 %

2.5 %

1.8 %

1.5 %

1.8 %

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

Rauch
Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

0.9

0.8

1.7

2.0

0.6 %

0.5 %

1.1 %

1.4 %

3.0 %

3.6 %

Metro
Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Others

1.5

5.0

4.3

1.0 %

3.3 %

2.5 %

4.7

4.9

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

143.4

150.8

171.5

159.5

137.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Nectar

40.1

43.5

54.2

42.4

40.0

27.9 %

28.8 %

31.6 %

26.6 %

29.1 %

Vino Zupa

15.3

31.5

45.2

48.7

37.5

10.7 %

20.9 %

26.3 %

30.5 %

27.2 %

8.6

12.1

14.0

29.0

25.4

6.0 %

8.0 %

8.1 %

18.2 %

18.4 %

24.3

9.4

9.9

10.0

9.8

16.9 %

6.2 %

5.8 %

6.2 %

7.1 %

IB Team

2.9

5.7

8.3

10.4

8.2

2.0 %

3.8 %

4.8 %

6.5 %

5.9 %

Duga Fruit

6.1

7.4

6.6

6.6

7.0

4.3 %

4.9 %

3.8 %

4.2 %

5.1 %

12.7

10.9

8.3

3.8

2.7

8.8 %

7.2 %

4.8 %

2.4 %

2.0 %

1.3

3.2

2.6

2.4

0.9 %

1.9 %

1.6 %

1.8 %

Fruvita
Fresh & Co

Swisslion Takovo
Rauch
Knjaz Milos

10.2

10.2

8.5

2.5

2.1

7.1 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

1.6 %

1.6 %

Agroekonomik

19.9

16.3

11.9

3.0

2.0

13.9 %

10.8 %

6.9 %

1.9 %

1.5 %

Bip Belgrade

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.5 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

Meridjian

1.2

0.7

0.4

0.9 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Others

1.5

1.2

0.7

1.0 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.4 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

0.5

0.5

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fruvita

22.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

Bahus

5.8

6.5

7.2

14.2

14.9

7.3 %

6.6 %

6.6 %

13.2 %

14.6 %

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

Coca-Cola
Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

11.0

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

10.7 %

Knjaz Milos

3.6

1.2

1.9

7.0

8.7

4.6 %

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Rodic
Vino Zupa
Elixir Natura D.o.o.
Minaqua

1.4
2.2

Agrokor

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

1.3 %
2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Nectar

8.4

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

10.6 %

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

Bip Belgrade

5.3

4.5

1.7

1.6

0.0

6.7 %

4.6 %

1.6 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

Agroekonomik
Meridjian

0.0

Duga Fruit

0.0
0.2

0.0 %
0.2

Swisslion

0.4

0.4 %

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.1 %

Others

13.4

15.3

10.6

13.7

12.8

16.9 %

0.0 %
0.2 %

0.2 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

79.1

99.0

108.3

107.9

102.0

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Fruvita

22.0

28.8

33.3

32.5

28.2

27.8 %

29.0 %

30.8 %

30.1 %

27.6 %

14.2

14.9

13.2 %

14.6 %

Bahus
Fresh & Co

12.2

18.7

15.0

12.9

12.3 %

17.3 %

13.9 %

12.6 %

Rauch

4.5

5.8

6.8

7.7

12.3

5.7 %

5.9 %

6.3 %

7.1 %

12.1 %

Knjaz Milos

3.6

1.2

1.9

7.0

8.7

4.6 %

1.2 %

1.8 %

6.4 %

8.6 %

13.2

13.4

13.4

7.7

7.7

16.6 %

13.5 %

12.4 %

7.1 %

7.5 %

1.2

2.6

1.1 %

2.5 %

Rodic
Vino Zupa

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Minaqua

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2.2

2.3

2.4

0.9

0.9

2.7 %

2.3 %

2.2 %

0.9 %

0.9 %

0.8

1.0

0.8

0.8

0.8 %

0.9 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

6.8

9.4

4.4

0.1

6.8 %

8.7 %

4.0 %

0.1 %

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.0

0.6 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.0 %

Jamnica
Nectar

% Share

8.4

Agroekonomik

10.6 %

Bip Belgrade

11.1

11.0

8.9

1.6

0.0

14.0 %

11.1 %

8.2 %

1.5 %

0.0 %

Voda Vrnjci

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.5

0.0

0.5 %

0.7 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.0 %

0.2

0.2

0.2 %

0.2 %

12.7 %

12.6 %

Duga Fruit
Swisslion Miloduh

0.4

0.4 %

Novosadska Mlekara

0.1

0.1 %

Meridjian

0.0

0.0

13.4

15.3

Others

10.6

13.7

12.8

0.0 %

0.0 %

16.9 %

15.4 %

9.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

24.7

25.4

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

Swisslion

3.5

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

14.1 %

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Pivara Nis

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7 %

1.3 %

1.3 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

Others

6.3

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

0.1 %
7.2

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

7.3

6.4

7.2

25.3 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

24.7

25.3

26.0

26.1

29.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rodic

4.6

5.2

5.8

6.0

6.8

18.5 %

20.4 %

22.1 %

23.0 %

22.9 %

Bip Belgrade

3.9

3.0

2.3

3.6

5.4

15.8 %

11.7 %

8.7 %

13.7 %

18.3 %

2.7

3.1

4.2

5.0

10.5 %

11.8 %

16.2 %

16.8 %

Swisslion Takovo
Nectar

4.3

5.8

6.2

4.6

4.4

17.3 %

22.9 %

23.9 %

17.5 %

15.1 %

Vino Zupa

1.4

0.7

0.6

1.2

0.7

5.5 %

2.8 %

2.4 %

4.4 %

2.4 %

Rubin

0.5

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

2.1 %

1.4 %

1.4 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

Jagodinska Pivara

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6 %

0.5 %

0.3 %

Swisslion Miloduh

3.5

Pivara Nis

0.2

1.3 %

1.3 %

Navip Zemun

0.0

Others

6.3

28.6 %

28.0 %

24.7 %

24.3 %

14.1 %
0.3

0.4

0.7 %
0.1 %

7.2

7.3

6.4

7.2

25.3 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Atlantic Grupa

8.0

10.6

16.4

17.2

18.4

70.3 %

71.1 %

92.6 %

93.8 %

94.5 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

22.1 %

20.4 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

Total

0.0

0.0

0.0

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

11.4

14.9

17.8

18.3

19.5

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Cedevita

8.0

10.6

13.3

14.3

14.3

70.3 %

71.1 %

75.0 %

77.8 %

73.5 %

Multivita

2.5

3.0

3.1

2.9

4.1

22.1 %

20.4 %

17.6 %

15.9 %

21.0 %

Vitaminka

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.9

5.1 %

6.9 %

6.1 %

5.6 %

4.8 %

Kendy

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

2.2 %

1.5 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

0.5 %

Total

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Others

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

Nestle
Agrokor
Rauch

0.9

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

13.7 %

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Knjaz Milos
Unilever
Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

Pivovarna Lasko

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

2.1 %

2.1 %

2.4 %

1.4 %

0.7 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Mercator

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.2 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0 %

0.0 %

Agroekonomik
A-BInBev
Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

InBev

1.7

0.3

0.1

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

Coca-Cola

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Others

0.3

0.6

3.7 %

3.1 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

Total

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

6.7

7.1

10.1

14.6

18.9

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

2.3

6.7

9.9

22.5 %

46.0 %

52.1 %

0.7

1.4

1.8

2.8

9.8 %

13.7 %

12.1 %

14.6 %

1.2

1.8

1.9

1.7

17.6 %

17.6 %

12.6 %

8.8 %

CCHBC
Jamnica
Rauch

% Share

0.9

PDF Editor

13.7 %

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Nectar

1.8

2.0

1.9

1.3

1.4

27.6 %

27.8 %

18.8 %

8.5 %

7.1 %

Fruvita

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.0

8.7 %

11.6 %

10.1 %

8.0 %

5.1 %

0.7

0.7

0.4

0.4

9.2 %

7.4 %

2.8 %

2.3 %

0.4

0.4

2.6 %

2.3 %

Knjaz Milos
A&P
Rodic

0.9

0.6

0.2

0.5

0.4

12.7 %

8.2 %

2.4 %

3.3 %

2.1 %

Vino Zupa

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.6 %

1.4 %

1.2 %

0.8 %

1.1 %

Pfanner

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

4.2 %

4.2 %

2.2 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Pivovarna Union

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.2 %

1.4 %

2.0 %

1.2 %

0.6 %

Fructal

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9 %

0.7 %

0.4 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Apatinska Pivara

1.7

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

24.6 %

3.8 %

1.1 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6 %

0.4 %

0.3 %

0.0 %

0.2 %

3.3 %

Agroekonomik
Frupi B&H

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.3 %

0.1 %

Fresh & Co

0.1

0.2

0.0

1.2 %

3.3 %

0.1 %

Others

0.3

0.0

0.0

3.9 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.0

0.6

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Rauch

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

62.5 %

60.0 %

56.1 %

40.0 %

35.2 %

Others

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

37.5 %

40.0 %

43.9 %

60.0 %

64.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

Total

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

0.5

0.7

58.3 %

62.2 %

0.6

0.1

0.3

91.8 %

11.1 %

26.6 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Knjaz Milos
PepsiCo

0.1

0.4

Agrokor
Pivovarna Lasko

0.0

0.1

Sinalco
Others

% Share

0.3

0.0

29.2 %

6.8 %

63.9 %

89.0 %

10.3 %

0.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.1

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

A&P

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.5

1.0

29.2 %

89.0 %

91.8 %

69.4 %

88.7 %

0.0

0.1

0.1

2.0 %

12.7 %

6.9 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.4 %

5.6 %

4.0 %

0.0

0.1

0.0

3.6 %

11.9 %

0.0 %

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.4 %

Jamnica
Pivovarna Union

0.0

0.1

Si & Si (Sinalco)
Others

0.3

0.0

6.8 %

63.9 %

10.3 %

0.6 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

Coca-Cola
Sinalco

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.6

1.3

1.5

8.4 %

11.1 %

13.1 %

10.2 %

11.1 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Carlsberg Group
Parksystem

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Others

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

10.1 %

0.8 %

0.4 %

0.7 %

0.8 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Million Litres

% Share

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Total

8.9

10.8

12.0

12.4

13.2

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

Knjaz Milos

6.2

7.7

8.3

7.9

7.3

69.7 %

70.9 %

68.5 %

63.6 %

55.6 %

0.2

1.1

2.2

1.5 %

9.1 %

16.6 %

CCHBC
Si & Si (Sinalco)

0.6

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.7

6.7 %

13.1 %

12.9 %

13.0 %

12.5 %

Red Bull Trading

0.8

1.2

1.3

0.9

1.2

8.4 %

11.1 %

10.8 %

7.2 %

9.0 %

Nectar

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.2

4.3 %

3.9 %

2.2 %

1.9 %

1.8 %

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.2 %

1.5 %

1.5 %

Carlsberg Serbia
Pivara Vrsac

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Others

0.9

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.4

10.1 %

0.8 %

2.7 %

3.8 %

2.9 %

SOURCE: Trade Interviews, Canadean

PDF Editor

Canadean Ltd is the beverage information specialist with nearly 40 years of experience in the commercial
beverage markets. In September 2010 Canadean joined the Progressive Digital Media Group.
The key feature of our methodology is that we operate within a web of inter-dependent industries and
companies, which we research and service at the same time - see chart The Canadean Field of Research.
This focused, but wide-ranging view of the industry forms the basis of all our Services.
The data in our research represents total consumption (based on ex-factory sales minus exports and plus
imports) and covers both at home and away from home channels.
Our research is complementary to consumer and retail surveys - the latter fall outside our area of expertise.
The majority of our research is compiled by on-the-ground analysts who work for us on a regular basis and
have, in many cases, clocked up many years of experience in the industry.
We have an experienced team of editors and analysts with an international perspective whose main brief is to
ensure that the data is interrogated for consistency and integrity before it is released to clients.

Our research is built from brand data upward. This 'brick-by-brick' approach as well as the cross-fertilisation
with our other related services, ensures that our research has an internal logic which cross-checks from all
angles - from brand volume through to corporate volume, flavour segmentation, packaging splits and channel
distribution.
The companies featured in the company profiles and those whose brands are featured in the individual market
categories are selected through regular market observation (see also our Quarterly Beverage Tracker) based
on the size of their output and/or their dynamism.

Face-to-face interviews with the leading soft drinks producers, brewers, dairy, spirits and wine
producers
On-going dialogue with leading companies in allied industries
Quarterly monitoring of product offered in all trade channels in selected markets
Interviews with retailers and other distributors
Company information in the public domain
Trade press
Trade associations
Official production and trade statistics

PDF Editor

All our annual reports are held in Canadean's investigative multi-dimensional, attribute-based database,
Wisdom, available as a web-based service or as 3-dimensional excel cub files, offering unique advantages to
our clients, in particular:

A high degree of standardisation across all markets


The ability to view the data in a flexible way, rather than what has been predetermined in a report table
The ability to conduct investigative analysis of the data by single attribute leading to insights and
understanding
The ability to run calculations
The ability to access the database at different levels Wisdom Direct for everyday/infrequent use or
Wisdom Analytics for the experienced user requiring a greater level of data and analytical functionality

Our latest on-line subscription service, Interactive Intelligence, allows clients to access their pdf reports faster
and with greater flexibility. Powerful one click tools provide a range of unique features, including:

The ability to search across the full text of all reports subscribed to
The ability to select and copy presentation-ready tables and graphics
The ability to create bespoke reports by selecting and copying specific sections
Nine language translation tool

PDF Editor

Industrial Research
... our area of expertise

Retail & Consumer Research


... other research companies
Plastics
(Resin)
Producer

Glass
Producer

Can Maker
Steel/
Aluminium
Supplier

Pre-Form
Producer

Carton
Systems
Closure
Manufacturer
Manufacturer/
Filler
Cluster/
MultiPack
Supplier

Franchisor

Other
Ingredients

Flavour
Houses

Wholesale
Trader

Retail
Outlet

Consumer

PDF Editor

Brand: See Trademark Brand


Brand Owner: See Trademark Owner
Caffeine Indicator: indicates whether caffeine is present or not
Options are:
No caffeine
With caffeine
Calorie Rating: indicates relative calorie content
Options are:
Low
Regular
Carbonation Indicator: indicates level of carbonation
Options are:
Low
Regular
No Carbonation
Category: See Product Definitions for full definitions of all beverage categories
Soft Drinks (standard):
- Packaged Water
- Carbonates
- Juice
- Nectars
- Still Drinks
- Squash/Syrups
- Fruit Powders
- Iced/Rtd Tea
- Iced/Rtd Coffee
- Sports Drinks
- Energy Drinks
Soft Drinks (extended):
- Bulk/HOD Water
- White Milk
- Cultured Dairy Drinks
- Fermented Milk
- Drinking Yogurt
- Flavoured Milk
- Soymilk
- Other Liquid Dairy
- Condensed Milk
- Evaporated Milk
- Hot Coffee
- Hot Tea
Beer & Cider
- Beer
- Cider
- Sorghum Beer
Spirits (standard):
- Spirits exc FABs and Fortified Wine
Spirits (extended):
- FABs
- Fortified Wine
- Rice Wine

PDF Editor

- Sake
Wine
Distribution:
Off-premise
Volume sold for 'subsequent consumption' away from the place of purchase, comprising:
Modern Retail:
-

Large Modern: Supermarkets, hypermarkets, department stores (Karstadt): modern facilities, typically
with electronic tills, barcode scanning and multiple checkout
- Convenience: Stores such as 7-11, garage forecourts - typically small food stores with long opening
hours, often selling ready meals and fast food
- Discount: Hard discounter stores, such as Lidl and Aldi, where focus is on low pricing.
- Traditional Retail: Traditional food stores: mom & pop style, CTNs, delis, pharmacies/drugstores.
Street stalls and kiosks (not for immediate consumption).
- Specialist Beverage Retailer: Off-licences, liquor stores, specialist drinks shops.
- Home Delivery: On-line/telephone/mail order, deliveries to home address.
On-premise
Volume sold for immediate consumption at the place of purchase, comprising:
Vending: Automatic merchandising machines selling (usually) branded beverages.
QSR: Quick Service restaurants. Payment is made prior to consumption.
EDA Places: Eating, Drinking & Accommodation. Eating: establishments where beverage consumption is
generally an accompaniment to a meal. Payment is made after consumption. Drinking: establishments
primarily engaged in the sale of drinks for consumption on premise. Accommodation: establishments where
the primary function is to provide accommodation facilities.
Institutions: Workplaces, hospitals, nursing homes, schools, universities, prisons, military.
Other On-premise: Such as cinemas, street stalls and kiosks, travel and transport, leisure (including
gyms/health clubs etc) and events.
Flavour: The flavour hierarchy has been revised and simplified. Please see Product Definitions for an
explanation of the flavour hierarchy structure and flavour definitions.
Functional Indicator: is used to identify products which have been enriched for general or specific health
benefits, with an ingredient which has been isolated and added for that purpose. For a full explanation of
definition and examples see Product Definitions.
Options are:
Fortified
Nutraceutical
None
Geography: allows for selection either globally or by region or individual country.
Ingredients Base: This indicates the base of a product before the flavour is added. For example, a lemon
iced/rtd tea may be based on black tea rather than green tea. See Ingredients Base in Product Definitions for
examples.
Juice Content Band: typical of a product expressed as a percentage between 0-100%. Bands are:
=0%
> 00% <05%
>=05% <15%
>=15% <25%
>=25% <50%
>=50% <100%
=100%
Local Operator: is defined as the company who is locally responsible for the brand eg CCHBC is the local
operator (l/o) for the Coca-Cola brands in Greece.

PDF Editor

Local Product: identifies further groups of products within the main soft drinks categories which are peculiar
to a particular country. They are concept rather than flavour-based. Frequently, these are 'fusion' products
combining products from more than one non-alcoholic beverage category. See Local Product in Product
Definitions for examples.
Market Definition: is a second set of definitions which runs in parallel with existing Canadean ingredientsbased category definitions. It is a subjective market driven measure, based on the local market view of the
product and where it fits in the consumer picture. For a full explanation of definition see Product Definitions.
Options are:
Packaged Water Plain
Flavoured Water
Functional Water
Carbonates
Juice/juice Drinks
Smoothies
Fruit/vegetable Shots
Still Drinks (low/no fruit)
Cereal/grain drinks
Herbal still drinks
Nut drinks
Squash/syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks
Energy Shots
Anti-energy/relaxation drinks
NFC Indicator (Not From Concentrate: indicates whether a juice, nectar or still drinks beverage is made
from concentrated juice or not.
Options are:
Not from concentrate
From concentrate
Pack Material: is the principal material used to construct the pack See Packaging Definitions for definition
detail.
Options are:
Board
Cornstarch
Foil
Glass
HDPE
LDPE
Metal
Paper
PEN
PET
Polycarbonate
Polypropylene
Polystyrene
Porcelain
PVC
Unpackaged

PDF Editor

Pack Type: See Packaging Definitions for definition detail.


Options are:
Bag in Box
Barrel
Bottle
Box
Bubble Top
Can
Carton
Cup
Demijohn
Drum
Jar
Keg
Pouch
Sachet
Tank
Tub
Tube
Unpackaged
Pack Size: is a number representing the size of the pack given in centilitres or grams.
Pack Size Unit: This is the unit of measure which interprets a given pack size.
Options are:
cl
g
Physical State: This attribute further classifies a product and describes the physical state of a beverage.
Options are:
Not rtd
Rtd
Private Label Indicator: indicates whether a brand is a Private Label (distributors' own brand/retailers own
brand). A Private Label brand can carry either the retailers name(eg Tesco, Carrefour etc) or a pseudo brand
unique to the retail chain (eg Rio Doro brand in Aldi, Trendy in Plus etc).
Options are:
Branded
PL
Unbranded
Refillable Indicator : This indicates whether a pack is refillable or not.
Options are:
Refillable
Not Refillable
Shelf State (Soft Alto cube): This indicates how the beverage should be stored and by implication whether it
is long-life or short-life. Options are:
- Ambient: relates to products that are distributed and marketed via an ambient distribution chain. (Note:
these products may be placed in chillers at the point of sale, eg in convenience stores because
consumers prefer to purchase chilled beverages, but would not usually be perceived as needing to be
chilled)
- Chilled: relates to products that are distributed and sold via the chilled distribution chain. These products
will be marketed and positioned as chilled products and will usually be perceived by consumers as
requiring chilling (although this may or may not be technically necessary)
- Frozen: relates to products that are packed, distributed and marketed in a frozen state and would need
to be stored in a freezer

PDF Editor

Stability (Packaging cube): indicates whether the pack is short-life (for products with a shelf-life of 7 days or
15 days if ESL eg smoothies, freshly squeezed orange juice) or long-life. Note: Frozen is classed as long-life.
Options are:
Long-life
Short-life
Trademark Brand: Trademark brands are the word or words that are the property of an individual company.
For some of the larger companies such as Coca-Cola and PepsiCo the brands have been separated, for
example:
Pepsi Twist
Pepsi Max
Coca-Cola Lime
Coca-Cola Vanilla
Gatorade Xplosive
Gatorade Frost
Robinson Fruit Break
Schweppes Dry Citrus
Trademark/Brand Owner: is defined as the ultimate owner of the trademark brand eg Nestl is the trademark
or brand owner (t/m) of San Pellegrino brand.
Water Source: This indicates the type of water (usually officially accredited). Options are:
- Mineral Water: Packaged water from a named underground spring officially certified as mineral and
displaying the word mineral on its label. The category includes products which make specific therapeutic
claims. No processing is allowed other than filtration and injection with carbon dioxide. Must be bottled
on-site at the source
- Spring Water: Naturally occurring pure water derived from an underground source. Treatment may
include filtration and/or decantation, and the injection of carbon dioxide
- Table Water: Potable packaged water which may have been rendered potable by processing
Other Wisdom Terminology:
Not Applicable: refers to volume that is not applicable to the attribute based on Canadean definitions
Unbranded/generic: refers to product that does not carry a brand name and is not marketed. (Private Label
product is identified separately under the Private Label Indicator)
Unknown: refers to where forecast detail is not reported. It may also be used where, for example, it has not
been possible to identify a Brand Owner or Local Operator
Unspecified: refers to volume where attribute detail is not collected (eg where data is recorded at topline level
only)

PDF Editor

Packaged Water
Caveat: Category volumes may include an element of double counting where packaged water is used
to dilute squash/syrups or powdered drinks.
All potable water including water with or without added flavourings and minerals/vitamins, but without
sugar/sweeteners, sold in large containers of up to and including 10 litres.

Still Water
Non-carbonated unsweetened mineral, spring or table water, with or without added flavourings and vitamin/
mineral enhancement.

Carbonated Water
Carbonated unsweetened mineral, spring or table water, including low-carbonation waters, either naturally
carbonated or which have been rendered carbonated by the injection of carbon dioxide, including 'low
carbonation' waters. Includes carbonated water with and without added flavourings and vitamin/mineral
enhancement.

Water Source

Mineral Water: Packaged water from a named underground source officially certified as mineral and
displaying the word mineral on its label. The category includes products which make specific
therapeutic or medicinal claims. No processing or treatment is allowed other than filtration and the
introduction or reintroduction of carbon dioxide. The addition of extra minerals or vitamin
enhancements is not permitted. Must be bottled at source
Table Water: Potable packaged water which may have been rendered potable by processing. May
come from more than one source and may include tap water or be transported from the source to the
bottling plant. The addition of minerals and/or vitamin enhancements is permitted. (Note: In China and
in the Baltics, mineralised water ie table water with minerals added is sold as a cheaper alternative to
mineral water)
Spring Water: Naturally occurring pure water derived from a single underground water table or
deposit. Treatment may include filtration and/or decantation, and the injection of carbon dioxide. Water
labelled as spring water must be bottled at source. In the UK spring water can only be tankered to the
bottling plant if this was the practice before 23 November 1996; the right to tanker is linked to the
spring not to the bottler. The addition of minerals and/or vitamin enhancements is not permitted

Flavoured Water
Packaged water which has been flavoured by the addition of essences and/or aromatic substances but which
does not contain sweetening agents (flavoured sweetened waters are included in carbonates if carbonated
and in still drinks if non-carbonated).

PDF Editor

Bulk/HOD Water
Caveat: Category volumes may include an element of double counting as bulk/HOD water is
sometimes used in the preparation of hot beverages, most typically tea. While the boiling of water for
tea may be expected to render the water safe there are markets where there can be especially bad
contamination (either of taste or by chemicals) which drives consumers to use bulk water or even
packaged water. This is most marked in countries where tea is particularly delicate (eg Turkey, China,
Japan) or the quality of water supply is poor (eg Indonesia, Philippines). Bulk water or packaged water
may also be used in the preparation of rice for the same reasons (eg South Korea).
There may also be some double counting where bulk/HOD water is used to dilute squash/syrups or
powdered drinks.
Potable water sold in packs of over 10 litres for use in dispensers. Includes water bottled on site for use in
Horeca outlets, in containers greater than 10 litres.

Tap Water
Piped water drawn from a tap or POU system (point of use). Estimated average human consumption of fluid is
of the order of 2 litres/day, but varies according to geography and climate. Tap water consumption is not
included in Canadean data.

Carbonates
Sweetened, non-alcoholic drinks containing carbon dioxide.
Excludes carbonated tea-based and coffee-based products (included in iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd
coffee drinks respectively) and carbonated sports drinks and energy drinks.
Includes syrups for home carbonated soft drinks dispensers eg Sodastream (dilution 1 + 9) and out of home
fountain syrups (expressed in rtd volume).
Includes carbonated juice (eg Appletiser), carbonated nectars and products such as Schorle, Mineralwasser
Plus and Gesptritzte Fruchtsaefte), regardless of juice content (see Local Product for definitions).
Includes sweetened water-based carbonated flavoured drinks (eg Perfectly Clear) and gaseosa.

Juice
100% pure fruit juice or vegetable juice with no added ingredients, except permitted minerals and vitamins for
the purpose of fortification and permitted additives. Salt, spices and herbs may be added to tomato juice.
Sweetening agents with less than 2% moisture (sucrose, dextrose anhydrous, glucose and fructose) may be
added; syrups (liquid sucrose, invert sugar solution/syrup, fructose syrup, liquid cane sugar, isoglucose and
high fructose syrup) may only be added to juice from concentrate/concentrated fruit juice. (The addition of
sugar to fruit juice is currently being reviewed by the EC). If flavours or colouring from sources other than the
reconstituted fruits are included the product cannot be categorised as a juice regardless of juice content. May
contain pulp and cells from the same kind of fruit.
Includes products:

- from concentrate - the fruit/vegetable is squeezed and concentrated through evaporation of natural
water content by evaporators, before being frozen and shipped to the country for use for packaging. The
product is then reconstituted to its original strength by addition of the same amount of water

PDF Editor

- not from concentrate - the fruit/vegetable is squeezed in the country of origin, lightly pasteurised and
frozen or aseptically packed for shipment to where it will be sold
- chilled - relates to products that are distributed and sold via the chilled distribution chain. These
products will be marketed and positioned as chilled products and will usually be perceived by
consumers as requiring chilling (although this may or may not be technically necessary)
- ambient - relates to products that are distributed and marketed via an ambient distribution chain. Note,
these products may be placed in chillers at the point of sale, eg in convenience stores because
consumers prefer to purchase a chilled beverage, but would not usually be perceived as needing to be
chilled
- frozen concentrated juice (expressed in ready to drink volume) - where the reconstituted product
conforms to the definition of juice above
Excludes carbonated juice (included in carbonates).

Nectars
Diluted fruit/vegetable juice and pulp, to which sweetening agents (eg sugar, honey, syrups and/or
sweeteners), permitted minerals and vitamins for the purpose of fortification and permitted additives may be
added.
If flavours or colouring from sources other than the reconstituted fruits are included the product cannot be
categorised as a nectar regardless of juice content. May contain pulp and cells from the same kind of fruit.
Whilst juice content is required to be equal to or in excess of 25% by volume, minimum juice content varies
according to the fruit in question. Includes products from concentrate and not from concentrate (see definition
under Juice), chilled and ambient products (see definition under Juice).
Excludes concentrates which when reconstituted conform to the definition of nectars above; these are
included in squash/syrups.
Excludes carbonated products such as Schorle, Mineralwasser Plus, carbonated nectars and products such
as Gespritzte Fruchtsaefte (included in carbonates).

Still Drinks
Flavoured ready to drink, non-carbonated products, which may be fruit or non-fruit flavoured and have a juice
content of 0-24.9%. Sugar, artificial flavouring and colouring may be added.
Excludes non-carbonated tea-based and coffee-based products (included in iced/rtd tea drinks and
iced/rtd coffee drinks respectively) and non-carbonated sports drinks and energy drinks.
Includes sweetened
Vitaminwater).

non-carbonated

water-based

flavoured

beverages

(eg

Coca-Colas

Glaceau

Squash/Syrups
Non-ready-to-drink (non-rtd) products, marketed as concentrates for home consumption. The category
includes fruit and non-fruit based products and flavours. All market figures shown in our database and
reports are expressed in ready to drink (rtd) volumes. Dilution ratio varies from country to country.
Excludes syrups for home and commercial carbonated soft drinks dispensers eg Sodastream (included in
carbonates).
Includes concentrates which when reconstituted conform to the definition of nectars above.

PDF Editor

Fruit Powders
Non-ready-to-drink (non-rtd) products in powder form. All market figures shown in our report are
expressed in ready to drink (rtd) volumes. Powdered drinks dilution ratio varies from brand to brand.
Excludes powdered tea and coffee-based drinks (included in iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee drinks
respectively) and powdered sports drinks and energy drinks (included in sports drinks and energy drinks
respectively).
Includes almost rtd (dosage) products (see Local Product definition) where a fruit powder portion is sold
together with a water serving eg Cedevita Go in East Europe.

Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks


Carbonated and non-carbonated ready to drink (rtd) packaged tea-based drinks and non-ready to drink (nonrtd) powders and liquid concentrates which dilute with water to make a product similar/identical to the ready to
drink product. Includes products based on black, green, oolong, barley, rooibos, white and mate tea, as well
as fruit, flower and herbal teas. Products can be cold or hot-filled and based on brewed tea or tea extract.
They may contain additional flavourings, typically fruit, floral or herbal, fruit juice, sweeteners and other
ingredients.
The category includes all products that have tea as their base flavour regardless of the percentage of milk or
soymilk content (ie this may be more than 50%). All powders and concentrates are expressed in ready to
drink (rtd) volumes.
The category also includes all products that have tea as their base flavour regardless of the percentage of
juice content. Typically this is in the range of 5-30%, but premium products with higher juice content are also
available in some markets such as the USA.
Includes tea and energy blends where tea is the base ingredient. Excludes tea and energy blends, where the
base formulation of the product is an energy drink and tea is the flavour, products are categorised under
energy drinks (see below).
Where product is made to order in chain coffee shops (such as Starbucks) from packaged ingredient, volume
is recorded as packaged (eg carton, sachet, bag in box) but where product is not derived from a packaged
input eg in independent restaurants and coffee shops, volume is recorded as unpackaged.

Iced/td Coffee Drinks


Primarily non-carbonated packaged ready to drink (rtd) and non-ready to drink (non-rtd) coffee-based drinks
(carbonated iced/rtd tea coffee is consumed traditionally in Calabria in southern Italy as a substitute for cola).
May be cold- or hot-filled, based on brewed coffee or coffee extract. Products may contain additional
flavouring (eg vanilla, chocolate) as well as sweeteners and other ingredients, notably milk.
Includes all products that have coffee as their base flavour regardless of the percentage of milk or soymilk
content (ie this may be more than 50%). Includes energy coffee products such as Java Monster (Hansen). All
powders and concentrates are expressed in ready to drink (rtd) volumes.
Where product is made to order in chain coffee shops such as Starbucks from packaged concentrate, volume
is recorded as packaged (eg carton, sachet, bag in box), but where product is not derived from packaged
concentrate eg in independent restaurants and coffee shops, volume is recorded as unpackaged.
Excludes coffee and energy blends, where the base formulation of the product is an energy drink and coffee
is the flavour, products are categorised under energy drinks (see below).
Includes coffee and energy blends where coffee is the base ingredient eg Full Throttle Coffee (Coca-Cola):

PDF Editor

Sports Drinks
Performance-enhancing products, described as isotonic, hypertonic or hypotonic, meaning in balance
with, lighter than and heavier than body fluids, respectively. Products contain B complex group vitamins,
such as:

B1
B2
B3
B5
B6
B7
B12

May also be termed:


Thiamin
Riboflavin
Niacin/niacinamide
Pantothenic acid
Pyridoxine hydrochloride
Biotin
Cyanocobalamin
Choline

As well as vitamin E (ie antioxidant), and vitamin C (ascorbic acid), along with key electrolytes such as
calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, glucose syrup, maltodextrin, sweeteners and acidity regulators (eg
sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide).
The category includes still or carbonated, ready to drink (rtd) products, non-ready to drink (non-rtd) powders
and concentrates. It also contains fruit and non-fruit flavoured products. All powders and concentrates are
expressed in ready to drink (rtd) volumes.

Energy Drinks
Energy-enhancing products, mainly carbonated and containing stimulants such as caffeine, taurine, guarana
(the guarana seed has a higher caffeine content than coffee), glucuronolactone, yerba mate, along with
glucose syrup (corn syrup) and maltodextrin. Includes B complex group vitamin combinations, typical
examples include:

B2
B3
B5
B6
B7
B9
B12

May also be termed:


Riboflavin
Niacin/niacinamide
Pantothenic acid
Pyridoxine hydrochloride
Biotin
Folic acid
Cyanocobalamin
Inositol

As well as vitamins A and E (ie antioxidants); vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L-carnitine; exotic herbs and
substances, such as gingko biloba, ginseng, milk thistle; acidity regulators. Products may also contain juice eg
Rockstar Juiced (70% juice content), Coca-Colas Burn Juiced (20% juice content).
Includes coffee and energy blends where the base formulation of the product is an energy drink and coffee is
the flavour. Includes tea and energy blends where the base formulation of the product is an energy drink and
tea is the flavour.
Excludes coffee and energy blends where the coffee is the base ingredient (eg Full Throttle Coffee), which
are categorised under iced/rtd coffee drinks (see above). Excludes tea and energy blends where the tea is
the base ingredient, which are categorised under iced/rtd tea drinks (see above).
The category includes still or carbonated, ready to drink (rtd) products, non-ready to drink (non-rtd) powders
and concentrates. Includes energy shots, typically packed in 5-6cl format, but no larger than 8-10cl (see full

PDF Editor

definition under Market Definition). All powders and concentrates are expressed in ready to drink (rtd)
volumes.
Excludes energy gels.

Calorie Rating
Low Calorie
Reduced calorie products marketed on a diet, reduced or low calorie platform and sweetened with high
intensity agents, either single or blended. Will be highlighted on the product label as:

diet/light/low calorie (<20 kcal/100ml)


mid calorie (50% less calories than normal)
sugar-free/zero/calorie free (<4kcal/100ml)
no (added)/low/reduced sugar (4g sugar per 100ml/approx <20kcal per 100ml)

Excludes low priced products which are produced using artificial intense sweeteners to replace sugar content
for cost purposes only (eg mainly Private Label product).
Regular
Products that are not marketed on a diet, reduced or low calorie platform.

Flavours
Flavour Hierarchy Structure
Following extensive consultation we have revised and simplified the flavour hierarchy structure. The primary
changes to the flavour structure are:
All key flavours have been given their own flavour category. This simplifies the flavour structure and gets away
from the inconsistency of categorising some flavours under other fruit and other non-fruit.
Mixed flavour combinations have now been consistently assigned to the dominant flavour within the mix. The
dominant flavour is the one that is perceived to be dominant either because it is the first listed in the product
description or, because it is perceived to be the dominant flavour as marketed by the producer.
Taking apple as an example, previously apple and apple mix were reported separately in addition to some
mixed apple flavours appearing under cocktail mix which meant that arriving at total apple volume was not
necessarily transparent. The new structure addresses this by grouping single apple flavours and mixed apple
flavours where apple is the dominant flavour (ie apple variants) under an overall apple total eg:
Apple
- Apple
- Apple variants (eg apple/apricot/orange etc)
Another key example is orange, where all single orange flavours and orange variants have been grouped
under an overall orange total eg:
Orange
- Orange
- Orange variants (eg orange/apple/grapefruit etc)
- Bergamot
- Clementine
- Tangerine
- Tangerine variants (eg tangerine/passion fruit etc)
- etc

PDF Editor

Flavour mixes - where product labelling indicates that no single flavour in a blend/mix is perceived to be
dominant eg tropical, summer fruits, red fruits etc, products are grouped under the Flavour Mix category:
Flavour Mixes
- Cocktail mix (fruit)
- Cocktail mix (non-fruit)
- Exotic fruits
- Red fruits
- Red fruit variants (eg red fruit/blood orange etc)
- etc
Berries all berry flavours are now grouped under an overall berries category eg:
Berries
- Berries (eg wild berries, yellow berries etc)
- Berry variants (eg berries/grape etc)
- Strawberry
- Strawberry variants (eg strawberry/apple/grape)
- etc
Vegetable all vegetable flavours and vegetable flavour variants are now grouped under an overall vegetable
category eg:
Vegetable
- Vegetable (ie where no specific vegetable type is specified)
- Vegetable variants (eg vegetable/tomato etc)
- Carrot
- Carrot variants (eg carrot/apple etc)
- Pumpkin
- Pumpkin variants (eg pumpkin/melon etc)
Herbs and spices flavours are now grouped under an overall herbs and spices category:
Herbs and spices
- Hawthorn
- Hawthorn variants (eg hawthorn/date/apple etc)
- Flower
- Rosehip
- Rosehip variants (eg rosehip/grape etc)
- etc
Citrus is now treated as a single flavour (previously part of cocktail mix) eg
Citrus
- Citrus
- Citrus variants (eg citrus/kiwi/pineapple etc)
Nut/seed flavours are now grouped under an overall nut/seed category eg:
Nut/seed
- Almond
- Nut/seed (ie where no specific nut/seed type is specified)
- Coconut
- Coconut variants (coconut/lime etc)
- etc
Tonic, mixers and bitters are now grouped under an overall Tonic, Mixers and Bitters category eg:
Tonic
- eg tonic, grapefruit tonic, lemon tonic etc
Mixers
- eg ginger ale, soda, lemon mixer etc
Bitters
- bitter lemon, bitter grapefruit, etc

Key Flavour Definitions


Apple
Clear or cloudy product with apple flavour, essence or juice-based. Excludes non-alcoholic cider (included in
other fruit variants). Includes clear or cloudy mixed fruit products, essence or juice-based, where apple is
deemed to be the dominant flavour (apple variants).

PDF Editor

Bitters
A group of carbonated drinks, often with a bitter or sour flavour, defined by usage rather than
flavour/ingredients. In most markets consumed with spirits or other strong alcoholic drinks to make an
alcoholic long drink (mixers), often with a bitter flavour derived from citrus peel and/or aromatic plants.
Includes: bitter grapefruit, bitter lemon, bitter melon, bitter orange and non-fruit bitter. Excludes: tonic, mixers
(eg cranberry spice mixer, lemon mixer etc which are included in mixers, non-alcoholic bitters (aperitif) (local
product) and bitter melon.
Cherry
Products with cherry flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes black morello cherry, cherry, sour cherry,
sweet cherry and wild cherry. Includes multi-fruit products, juice or essence-based, where cherry is deemed
to be the dominant flavour (cherry variants).
Citrus
Clear or cloudy product labelled as citrus flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes multi-fruit products, juice
or essence-based, where citrus is deemed to be the dominant flavour (citrus variants).
Cola
Clear (non-cloudy), essence-based product flavoured with cola, where cola is the dominant flavour. Includes
cola with secondary flavouring such as cherry cola, cola with lemon, cola with lime, cola with vanilla (cola
variants).
Clear Lemonade
Clear (non-cloudy), essence-based, lemon flavoured products. Includes mixed flavour products where clear
lemonade is perceived to be the dominant flavour (clear lemonade variants)
Cream Soda
Non-cloudy colourless or coloured carbonate normally flavoured with vanilla.
Flavour Mixes
Juice or essence-based product where no single flavour is perceived to be dominant eg cocktail mix (fruit),
cocktail mix (non-fruit), red fruits, summer fruits, tropical mixes etc.
Grape
Products with grape flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes muskate grape, black grape, red grape and
white grape. Includes multi-fruit products, juice or essence-based, where grape is deemed to be the dominant
flavour (grape variants).
Grapefruit
Clear or cloudy product with grapefruit flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes standard (yellow), pink and
red grapefruit. Includes multi-fruit products, juice or essence based, where grapefruit is deemed to be the
dominant flavour (grapefruit variants).
Herbs and Spices
Products flavoured with aromatic herbs, flowers, spices or roots, including mixed herbal flavours where the
aromatic plant flavour is deemed to predominate.
Includes many composite herbal flavours known by local names and non-alcoholic ginger beer (traditional
UK drink traditionally obtained by fermenting sugar, ginger root and cream of tartar). Excludes ginger ale
(included in mixers).
Lemon
Clear or cloudy product with lemon flavour, juice or essence-based. In southern European markets
carbonates products often contain lemon juice; usually up to 12%. Excludes bitter lemon (included in mixers).
Includes multi-flavour products, juice or essence-based, where lemon is deemed to be the dominant flavour
(lemon variants).

PDF Editor

Lemon-Lime
Clear or cloudy flavoured product with lemon and lime, juice or essence-based. The category excludes single
lemon or single lime. Includes multi-flavour products, juice or essence-based, where lemon-lime is deemed to
be the dominant flavour (lemon-lime variants).
Melon
Products with melon flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes cantaloupe, melon and watermelon. Includes
multi-fruit products, juice or essence-based, where melon is deemed to be the dominant flavour (melon
variants).
Mixers
A group of carbonated drinks, defined by usage rather than flavour/ingredients. In most markets consumed
with spirits or other strong alcoholic drinks to make an alcoholic long drink. Includes soda water, soda with
lime, ginger ale, ginger ale/cranberry, ginger ale/raspberry, cranberry spice mixer, lemon mixer, lemon
spice mixer, orange mixer, peach mixer, mixers and non-fruit mixers (eg such as ginger beer). Excludes
tonic, non-alcoholic bitters (aperitif) (local product), bitter grapefruit, bitter lemon, bitter orange, non-fruit bitter
(included in bitters) and bitter melon.
Orange
Clear or cloudy product with bergamot, chinotto (Italian bitter orange mostly consumed straight, not as a
mixer or as a bitter/aperitif), clementine, kumquat, orange, tangerine or mandarin flavour, essence or juicebased. Excludes bitter orange (included in mixers). Includes multi-flavour products, juice or essence-based,
where bergamot, chinotto, clementine, orange, tangerine or mandarin are deemed to be the dominant flavour
(orange variants, kumquat variants, tangerine variants, mandarin variants).
Original Energy
Refers to classic energy drink flavour formulations such as Red Bull (Red Bull Trading).
Pepper
Clear (non-cloudy) essence-based, fruit-flavoured carbonate sold under the Dr Pepper Snapple Group
(previously Cadbury Schweppes) owned Dr Pepper brand (flavourings include caffeine); competing products
are modelled closely on the Dr Pepper brand.
Plum
Products with plum flavour, juice or essence-based. Includes sour plum. Includes multi-fruit products, juice or
essence-based, where plum is deemed to be the dominant flavour (plum variants).
Root Beer
Also known as sarsaparilla, root beer is traditionally made from dried root flavourings derived from a range of
tropical plants, although today the flavouring is often made synthetically. Found mainly in North America (eg
A&W). Countries such as Malaysia and Hong Kong term root beer beverages as sarsi. Includes multi flavour
products (root beer variants)
Shandy
Mixed, non-alcoholic drink of beer and lemonade or beer and ginger beer with an alcoholic strength less than
or equal to 0.5% Abv. Excludes alcoholic shandy (included in beer). Found mainly in the UK and Northern
Ireland.
Soda Water
Primarily carbonated water and sodium salts such as sodium bicarbonate. Typically used as a mixer with
alcoholic drinks, such as whisky, brandy, cocktails or with wine, but also consumed on its own.
Tea
Where an iced/rtd tea drink brand has no additional flavour (eg lemon, peach etc) it is attributed as tea flavour,
rather than as unflavoured (as previously).

PDF Editor

Tonic
Sweetened carbonated drink containing quinine and flavoured with natural fruit and plant extracts. Includes
tonic (non-cloudy, colourless) and tonic with fruit flavours eg grapefruit, lemon, lime, mandarin. Typically used
as a mixer with alcoholic drinks such as gin, but also consumed on its own.

Functional Indicator
Whilst there is currently no universally accepted definition of a functional drink, the Functional Indicator is used
to identify products which have been enriched for general or specific health benefits, with an ingredient which
has been isolated and added for that purpose in order to obtain a price premium.
Products may be:

Fortified - enhanced with the addition of vitamins and minerals (or combinations of both) to deliver
general health benefits. Products may be typically:
- fortified with additional vitamins eg A, C, E, D2, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12 or value-added selections
(eg ACE)
- fortified with additional minerals eg calcium, magnesium, iron (eg juice with added calcium)
- fortified with other 'general' health benefit ingredients, such as essential fatty acids eg omega-3, fibre
and antioxidants
- excludes table water with added minerals ie mineralised water, typical to China and for example
some Baltic markets
- includes fruit powders where vitamins are highlighted as having been added above the base
product composition in order to differentiate the product from other fruit powders and obtain a price
premium

The Functional Indicator does not apply to:


A product without the support of added functional ingredients over and above the active ingredients of
the base composition of the product, such as vitamin C in juice or naturally forming catechins in
iced/rtd tea that promote fat utilisation as energy. Therefore, products which are 'naturally' healthy,
such as 100% juice, 'superfruits' (eg cranberry, pomegranate), smoothies (with no added ingredients)
and packaged water are excluded
Fruit powders which contain vitamins as part of the base formulation and which are not highlighted as,
or marketed as, providing a health benefit
Performance enhancers
- as a result of 'base' formulation ie sports drinks
(sustaining/rehydration/recovery), and energy drinks (instant/boost). These are identified separately by
their category attribution. Where a sports or energy drink has had ingredients added for health benefits
beyond the usual scope of its specific category (see Sports Drinks and Energy Drinks definitions
above), then the appropriate Functional Indicator is applied
Nutraceutical - containing supplements with a distinct functional claim (ie may help to improve health
and well-being or assist with avoidance of the onset of illness) targeting specific consumer
groups/needs. The claim should be highlighted on the pack and the product marketed on this platform.
Examples include: co-enzyme Q10 for healthy heart; echinacea for cold/flu immunity; isoflavones for
women's skin/bone health; L-carnitine for healthy heart/lungs and weight loss; herbal extracts such as
sage or mint to aid digestion etc

Ingredients Base
Ingredients base indicates the base of a product before the flavour is added. For example, a lemon iced/rtd tea
may be based on black tea rather than green tea.
Dairy-based
Contains milk <50%: products with a milk base. If milk content is over 50% products should be
included in dairy drinks - with the exception of iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee drinks
Contains milk >50%: indicates where an iced/rtd tea drink or iced/rtd coffee drink brand contains
more than 50% milk
Contains soy <50%: products with a soymilk base. If soy content is over 50% products should be
included in soymilk - with the exception of iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee drinks

PDF Editor

Contains soy >50%: indicates where an iced/rtd tea drink or iced/rtd coffee drink brand contains more
than 50% soymilk
Contains yogurt <50%: products with a yogurt base. If yogurt content is over 50% products should be
included in drinking yogurt - with the exception of iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee drinks

Tea-based
Black tea: products with a black tea base
Barley tea: products with a barley base, typical to Asia
Blended tea: products made from one or more teas mixed with flavouring or other added ingredients
Green tea: products with a green tea base
Herbal tea: products with a herbal base
Jasmine tea: products with a jasmine tea base
Mate: products with a yerba mate base, common to South America
Oolong tea: tea originally from Taiwan made from semi-fermented oolong tea leaves
Red bush tea: also known as rooibos, the tea is made from the South African herb, aspalathus
linearis. It is caffeine-free and rich in anti-oxidants
White tea: products with a white tea base. White tea is made from the new growth buds and young
leaves of the camellia sinesis tea plant. It is a specialty of Fujian province in China
Other
Bean-based: products containing black, red, kidney or mung beans or soybean, typical to some
nectars and still drinks products in China. Excludes soybean flavoured soymilk which is categorised as
soymilk
Cereal-based: products with a cereal base eg oats, millet or buckwheat, typically found in the still
drinks category in China
Contains bamboo leaf: products containing extract of bamboo leaf, typically found in China
Contains nuts: products containing ground nuts, typical to China
Corn-based: products with a corn-base, primarily sweet corn and typical to China. May contain
flavouring. Corn juice/extract content varies, but can be as high as 96%
Malt-based: unfermented, non-alcoholic soft drinks, containing malt, sugar, malted barley and
flavouring, typical to Turkey and Middle Eastern countries (eg Fayrouz brand - Heineken)
Rice grain: unfermented products with a ground rice base, typically used in some dilutables in Mexico
and in some nectars and still drinks in China

Local Product
Local product identifies further groups of products within the main soft drinks categories which are peculiar to a
particular country/geographical area. They are concept rather than flavour-based. Frequently, these are
'fusion' products combining products from more than one non-alcoholic beverage category.

Aguas Frescas: most common in Mexico, but also present in Central America and the Caribbean,
aguas frescas is a blend of either fruit, cereals or seeds plus sugar and water. Tamarind and Jamaica
(hibiscus) are the most typical flavours
Almost rtd (dosage): identifies products which comprise a fruit powder portion sold together with a
water serving, such as Cedevita Go in East Europe. Cedevita Go is packed in a nrPET bottle with a
large-sized cap holding the powder which is released into the water below when the bottle is
unscrewed
Asian Speciality Beverages (+ country ISO code): identifies products specific to particular Asian
markets such as cincau and jelly drinks, and major Asian flavours such as chrysanthemum. Products
are primarily non-carbonated. (Pictured right is Surging Eel, produced by Japan Tobacco Inc)
Baikal: traditional to countries such as Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, it is a carbonate based on herbal
extracts such as hypericum/licorice/siberian ginseng or leuzea/eucalyptus /lemon/laurel/pine
Buratino: a clear lemonade carbonate traditional to countries such as Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
Blandet Saft: traditional to Denmark, it is a concentrate made from various combinations of 100%
crushed fruit with high sugar content. Dilution ratio is normally 4:1.
Coconut Water: products with a coconut water base, popular in Brazil and growing in the USA
Cola Mix: A mixture of cola and another flavoured carbonate, normally orange, and labelled as 'cola
mix'.

PDF Editor

Frozen Carbonated Beverage: refers to dispensed carbonated frozen beverages


Guarana Water: products with a guarana base, a south-eastern Brazil phenomena
Gespritzte Fruchtsaefte: carbonated nectars made from fruit juice (approx 50%) and sparkling
mineral water, typical to Austria (included under carbonates)
Horchata: typical to countries such as Spain, where products are based on chufa (tiger nut) and
Mexico, where products are rice-based
Julebrus: is a seasonal carbonated drink produced by most Norwegian brewers as a Christmas soft
drink for children who are not legally eligible to enjoy the traditional julel or Christmas Ale
Kissel: traditionally a homemade juice drink thickened with corn or potato starch or arrowroot, but now
commercially produced - typical to Russia
Kolokolchik: a clear lemonade carbonate traditional to countries such as Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
Kvass (kvas): a traditional, fermented non-alcoholic carbonated or still beverage in Russia, the Baltic
States and most of the former Soviet bloc countries, is made from rye malt or rye bread fermented with
water, sugar, yeast and lactic acid. Traditionally it was made at home by fermenting bread with water
and sugar to produce a naturally fizzy, mild tasting drink with a malt/cereal flavour. There are two
distinct types of kvass tracked under Canadean soft drinks definitions:
- Flavoured kvass (FLVK): kvass-flavoured carbonates. In Russia and Belarus legislation demands
that these products must be labelled as kvass-flavoured drinks to differentiate them from naturally
brewed kvass
- Fermented kvass (FRMK) naturally brewed kvass, typically produced by brewers. Includes the old
style fermented bulk/barrel kvass (made from fermented bread waste or malted oats/barley/wheat)
dispensed from barrels between April and September, with a shelf life of one to two days and new
long-life branded product with a shelf-life of three to six months. The latter is packed in glass, can
and single-serve and multi-serve PET and is also now available in on-premise in draught format

Lactic Acid Drinks: ready to drink diluted lactic base and concentrated lactic acid bacteria culture
drinks, found typically in Japan (eg Calpis), South America (eg Ades) and Switzerland (eg Rivella)
Limonata: a traditional Turkish lemon flavoured still drink that has seen a dramatic renaissance over
the last year; available in rtd, powder and concentrate formats
Liquid Candy: negligible to low juice content, geared exclusively to children in countries such as Chile
and Mexico
Mageu: a traditional, fermented non-alcoholic maize-based beverage in South Africa made from maize
meal, water and sugar. It is still widely made at home, but is also commercial available in traditional
outlets and supermarkets. Primarily a short-life product it is also available in a powdered format
Malt Drink (Malta): a non-alcoholic beverage produced by brewers in a process under which wort is
brewed before caramel is added to provide the characteristic brown colour. Vitamins are then added
(usually A, B and D) before carbon dioxide is injected. The final process is pasteurisation. Products are
packed in bottle or can
Maltidsdricka: traditional Swedish squash/syrup (dilution 1:4) typically sold in cartons or in bulk and
included in squash/syrups
Medicinal Water: carbonated, low carbonated or still waters carrying a therapeutic claim - found
mainly in Germany and East European countries such as Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
Mineralised Water: table water with added minerals, sold as a cheaper alternative to mineral water in
China and the Baltics
Mineralwasser Plus/Schorle: mineralwasser plus are carbonated drinks containing approximately
30% juice depending on type of juice, typical to Germany. Schorle is also traditional to Germany,
usually made from 50% apple juice and 50% mineral water
Mors: berry-based drinks, traditional to countries such as Russia and the Ukraine
Must: carbonated unfermented grape drink, traditionally consumed during festive periods in Sweden
Non-alcoholic Bitter (Aperitif): carbonated long versions of alcoholic bitter aperitifs, found mainly on
the Italian market
Poonsh: in Bulgaria, the poonsh group, features hundreds of still drinks brands, characterised by
strong colours, exotic flavours (including mixes), thick consistency, no fruit content, large size
containers and low prices. It represents the very low-end of the still drinks spectrum both in terms of
quality and in terms of price per litre
Salted Soda Water: carbonated unflavoured beverage containing sodium bicarbonate found in China.
May contain sweetener

PDF Editor

Sayany: a Leuzea-based (herbal) carbonate traditional to countries such as Russia, Belarus and
Ukraine
Sikhe: fermented, sweetened rice or rice nectar drinks, typical to countries such as South Korea
Sitro: a clear lemon/orange/tangerine/vanilla flavoured carbonate traditional to countries such as
Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
Tarkhun: tarragon or woodruff based carbonate traditional to countries such as Russia, Belarus,
Ukraine, the Baltics and Kazakhstan
Vinegar drinks: sour tasting beverages, containing vinegar (or in some cases acid to produce the
sour taste), perceived to be beneficial to health. Juice content varies between 0-99%. Found in
countries such as China and Japan
Wellness Drinks: flavoured, sweetened carbonated mineral water offering a health benefit claim eg in
Austria Voeslauer Balance, Almdudler Pro-Ego, included in carbonates or still drinks depending on
carbonation

Market Definition
In order to be able to track the newer and emerging products in the market, we have added a second set of
definitions, in parallel with the existing ingredients
-based category definitions. Market Definition is a
subjective, market-driven measure, based on the local market view of the product and where it fits in the
consumer picture. The table below sets out the Market Definition categories and key corresponding Canadean
categories. Each of the Market Definition categories are a distinct competitive set and add up to 100% of the
market in a given country:
Market Definition
Packaged Water Plain
Flavoured Water
Functional Water
Carbonates
Juice/juice Drinks
Smoothies
Fruit/vegetable Shots
Still Drinks (low/no fruit)
Cereal/Grain Drinks
Herbal Still Drinks
Nut Drinks
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks
Energy Shots
Anti-energy/relaxation drinks

Key Corresponding Canadean Categories (there may be


others)
Packaged Water
Packaged Water, Carbonates, Still Drinks
Packaged Water, Carbonates, Still Drinks, Sports Drinks
Carbonates
Juice, Nectars, Still Drinks with high fruit content (eg >10% juice)
Juice, Nectars
Juice, Nectars
Still Drinks with low/no fruit content (eg <10% juice)
Still Drinks with low/no fruit content (eg <10% juice), Still Drinks
with high fruit content (eg >10% juice)
Still Drinks with low/no fruit content (eg <10% juice)
Still Drinks with low/no fruit content (eg <10% juice)
Squash/Syrups
Fruit Powders
Iced/Rtd Tea Drinks
Iced/Rtd Coffee Drinks
Sports Drinks
Energy Drinks
Energy Drinks
Carbonates, Still Drinks

Packaged Water Plain: definition as per


with no added ingredients.

standard definition, but comprises only unflavoured water,

Flavoured Water: packaged water which has been flavoured by the addition of essences and/or aromatic
substances, which may or may not contain sweetening agents. These products usually come from a packaged
water provenance, the brands often being owned by water companies but not exclusively.
Typically:

PDF Editor

There is a clear statement on the label or packaging highlighting that the product is made with spring
or mineral water eg Mineralwasser Plus, and it is marketed on this platform
The product will tend to be positioned in or next to the packaged water section in retail outlets
It will be perceived by consumers and the industry as a packaged water, or a packaged water
derivative
It will tend to be marketed on a health/wellness platform, as a 'lighter', lower calorie product

Functional Water: these products may be:

Unflavoured or flavoured water brands with added functional ingredients such as vitamins, minerals
or nutraceutical-type ingredients (eg Echinacea)
Products using 'hydration' as a marketing platform, with added functional ingredients, but not having a
packaged water provenance eg Propel, Mizone, Glaceau. Water will be the main product 'base', with
flavourings/juice, and functional ingredients added. The Functional Indicator is used to specify whether
the product is fortified or nutraceutical

Energy Shots: Positioned as high intensity energy drinks products with ingredients conforming to Canadeans
energy drink definition (see above), designed for one shot consumption and typically packed in 5-6cl bottles,
but no larger than 8-10cl. Brands are usually suffixed with energy shot (eg Red Bull Energy Shot) to
differentiate variants from normal energy drinks products (eg Red Bull). Excludes energy gels.
Anti-energy/relaxation drinks: Rather than offering an energy/instant boost, these primarily non-carbonated
products promise to calm the mind, reduce stress levels and improve sleep quality. Packaged primarily in can
or shot format, the focus is on naturalness with ingredients typically including valerian root, rosehips, Ltheanine, melatonin and chamomile.
Smoothies: comprise blended fruit puree and juice drinks with a thick, smooth texture, sometimes
incorporating a dairy element (yogurt) and/or functional elements (eg aloe vera, gingko, ginseng):

Both chilled and ambient products can be found


Positioned as fresh and pure, most smoothies do not contain artificial flavours, additives or sweeteners
The definition includes packaged products and products made to order in on-premise outlets
Products with a 'smoothie' positioning can be found in the juice and nectars categories, depending on
juice content and/or ingredients. Where there is some dairy content, this is highlighted using the
Ingredients Base attribute (eg contains yogurt)
Includes smoothies containing less than 50% dairy:
Excludes products containing more than 50% dairy which are included in the drinking yogurt segment
under Dairy Drinks

Fruit/Vegetable Shots: are fruit or vegetable-based juices (typically 100% juice, concentrated), designed for
'one shot' consumption and marketed on a health platform. They are typically packaged in 60-100ml bottles.
Examples include Unilevers Knorr Vie brand.

Made on the Spot (Recorded either in the text or in certain countries as 'unpackaged')
Made on the Spot (MOS) volumes are commercial beverages (ie a monetary transaction takes place prior to
consumption) and usually unpackaged:
- loose, processed 'on the spot' and served in a wide variety of containers (eg cups, plastic bags, reused
bottles etc) for consumption either 'on the go' or at home
- often sold in informal outlets eg street kiosks, mobile vendors etc
But may sometimes be packaged:
- by the vendor eg freshly squeezed juice in PET bottles, often sold in juice bars/cafes and even in
supermarkets where juicing machines are available. Maybe displayed 'on ice'
MOS volumes do not include:

PDF Editor

industrially made product sold on the street eg Coca-Cola or Evian water sold by a bicycle vendor
product made from concentrates powders/squash, which are purchased and then diluted and re-sold

White Milk
Caveat: Category volumes may include an element of double counting in countries such as India and
Pakistan where hot tea is traditionally consumed with a high ratio of milk. Volumes include milk that
may not be consumed as a beverage eg used in cooking or poured over cereals such as cornflakes.
Liquid white milk. Includes unfermented, unflavoured milk from all animals (including cows, sheep,
goats and buffalo), both processed and unprocessed, packaged and bulk milk
Includes powdered milk, except powdered infant formula and follow-on milk
Includes reconstituted or recombined white milk, lactose-reduced white milk and organic white milk as
well as fortified/enriched white milk
Excludes ready to drink baby milk, evaporated and condensed milk, filled milk and whitener

Cultured Dairy Drinks

Liquid, fermented milk products characterised by their sour taste, flavoured and unflavoured, with and
without sweeteners and other added ingredients. Excludes semi-liquid products, spoonable and
squeezable products. Includes products such as:

Fermented Milk

Fermented milk, such as ayran, laban, kefir - other major types of fermented milk, characterised by
differing degrees of fermentation/sourness achieved using different bacteria. In addition buttermilk - a
slightly sour, whitish liquid, traditionally a by-product from the production of butter from cream, but
today also produced from fermented skimmed milk

Drinking Yogurt

Drinking yogurt - yogurt thinned by homogenisation and/or dilution; normally flavoured. May contain
colouring, sweeteners, and stabilisers. Includes probiotic yogurt drinks such as Yakult and Actimel.
Includes smoothies containing more than 50% dairy (smoothies containing less than 50% dairy are
included in soft drinks)

Flavoured Milk

Ready to drink and powdered white milk to which flavouring and often sweeteners, colourings and
stabilisers have been added
Includes white milk mixed with fruit juice where milk is the majority ingredient. Excludes products
where milk content is less than 50%
Excludes tea and coffee-based products - even where milk content is >50%. Excludes tea and coffeebased flavoured milk drinks. These are classified under iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee
drinks
Includes products such as Ovaltine and Horlicks that contain significant quantities of milk; powder
variants are intended to be diluted with water as the products contain sufficient milk powder
Excludes products such as the Nesquik and Ovaltine variants which are intended to be mixed with milk

Soymilk

Lactose-free, ready to drink 'milk' made by grinding soya beans and pressing out the resulting liquid.
Traditional to countries such as China and Japan
Includes flavoured and unflavoured, sweetened and unsweetened and powdered products

PDF Editor

Excludes products where soymilk content is less than 50%. This applies to beverages such as AdeZ
with only 1% soy content, which are categorised as a nectar or still drink in accordance with their juice
content
Excludes tea and coffee-based products - even where soymilk content is >50%. These are classified
under iced/rtd tea drinks and iced/rtd coffee drinks
Soymilk has a soy protein content 1.8%

Other Liquid Dairy (Packaging only)


Includes:

Evaporated Milk

Evaporated milk (unsweetened condensed milk) has been treated to remove some 60% of the water to
reach concentration. Sterilisation is required. Typically canned. May be diluted for use in beverages
and cooking

Condensed Milk

Condensed milk (sweetened) is made in the same way as evaporated milk, but sterilisation is not
required due to high sugar content. Typically canned. May be diluted for use in beverages and cooking

Coffee
Ready to drink hot coffee (all volume expressed in ready to drink/diluted litres) obtained from infusion of
roasted, ground coffee beans in hot water or solution of 'instant' coffee (granules or powdered coffee extract
obtained by spray- or freeze drying, instantly soluble in hot water) and hot water. Dilution ratios vary by country
according to local taste. Excludes iced/rtd coffee drinks (see iced/rtd coffee drinks definition above).

Tea
Ready to drink hot tea (all volume expressed in ready-to-drink/diluted litres) made from infusion of dried tea
leaves or herbal and/or fruit ingredients in hot water or from instant, freeze-dried tea in granular or powdered
form. Dilution ratios vary by country. Excludes iced/rtd tea drinks (see iced/rtd tea drinks definition above).
There are three main types of tea made from the leaves of the tea bush: green tea, which is unfermented
roasted immediately after harvesting and gives a strong, bitter and quite clear infusion; black tea, the most
common, which is fermented and dried; and oolong tea, which is semi-fermented and intermediate between
green and black tea. Includes flavoured teas (tea with added flavourings such as jasmine, mint, rosehip,
bergamot, orange flower).
Also includes herbal/fruit 'teas' with no actual tea component eg raspberry, apple, blackcurrant, mint, camomile
tea.

Fermented alcoholic beverages - typically, but not exclusively made from malt - to which hops have been
added. Includes:

PDF Editor

Lager
Bottom fermented beer, usually blond in colour. 0-10% abv. Accounts for over 90% of all beer sold worldwide.
Also often labelled as Pilsner or Pils, although there is no legal definition of these terms.

Ale
A top-fermented beer, usually amber in colour and sold primarily in the British Isles. Versions of Ale are also
known as Bitter, Mild, Brown Ale, Light Ale and IPA. 0-10% abv.

Stout
A top-fermented beer, usually very dark, or black in colour and most popular in Ireland and the UK, although
Stout is found in all regions of the world. 2-7.5% abv.

Wheat Beer
A top-fermented beer, made using wheat, rather than barley malt. Can be cloudy ('white') or blonde in colour.
Also known as Weissbier, Weizen and Witbier.

Other Top Fermented Beers


Encompasses all other top-fermented (ie non-lager) beers. Includes Altbier and Kolsch in Germany and
Abbaye, Trappiste, Gueze, Lambic and other special beers in Belgium.

Beer Mixes
Beer mixed with soft drinks, usually lemonade or cola.
Includes Shandy, Panache, Radler and
Biermixgetranke. Canadean only collects data on pre-mixed beer mixes. Considerable volumes of beer mixes
are postmix (made at point of dispense eg shandy in the UK) and such volumes are not included.

Flavoured Beer
Flavoured beer is defined as a normal strength beer with added flavours, often fruit, or spirits (eg Tequila).
Does not include beer mix drinks.

Others
Speciality lagers, usually dark in colour and strong in alcohol. Composition of this sub-category will vary widely
from market to market. Also includes seasonal (eg Christmas or Easter) beers.

Low Calorie Beer


The beer must be specifically marketed as a low calorie beer. Light beers are often, but not always low calorie.
The exceptions are brands such as Chang Light and Singha Light in Thailand which suggest that they are low
calorie, but due to the high alcohol content are in fact very close to regular versions of the brands.

BEER DEFINITION BY ALCOHOLIC STRENGTH


Although most beer market have some form of local segmentation based upon alcoholic strength, the lack of
consistency in definitions and category boundaries makes international comparison very difficult. In order to
facilitate international analysis of the beer market by alcoholic strength Canadean has created a standard
strength segmentation:

No alcohol - Less than or equal to 0.5% abv

PDF Editor

Low alcohol -0.6-3.0% abv


Standard strength -3.1-5.5% abv
Strong beer - 5.6% abv and above

BEER DEFINITION BY PRICING


The task of defining positioning is both a difficult and contentious issue. Canadean believes that a focus on
price is ultimately the most reliable definition as it is objective and there is a direct correlation between
positioning and profitability.
Taking the leading brand in the most popular pack type as the standard (=100), all other brands have been
indexed against this brand/pack type. Brands which have an index of 110-150 have been taken to be
premium, while those brands which have an index in excess of 150 are counted as super premium. Brands
which fall below an index of 90 form the value or discount segment, while the mainstream segment is
formed of brands which fall into the 90-109 band.

BEER DEFINITIONS BY PROVENANCE/AVAILABILITY LOCAL/NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL


Beer brands often have their own competitive set based upon their provenance and availability. Canadean
segments the beer market into three categories:

Local - brands which do not have national distribution or where a significant proportion of the brand
volume is derived from a particular region. 'Region' des not have to be a defined administrative area.
It is assumed that the bulk of volume included in 'others' will fall into this category
National - domestic brands which have national distribution and where there is no significant volume
skew to a particular region
International - brands which originate outside the country. Maybe imported or produced under
licence. Excludes domestic brands which are packaged in another country and then re-imported

Sorghum Beer
A low alcohol grain-based beer traditional to sub-Saharan African countries; home-made in rural areas.
Ingredients are typically a mixture of sorghum and corn with sugar, lactic acid, yeast and molasses. Maximum
abv of 4%.

Cider
Fermented apple juice drink or pear juice drink (sometimes termed as perry), with an abv of 0.5-10%.

Wine
Defined as juice of freshly gathered grapes, vinified according to the customs and traditions of the country of
origin. Wine normally contains between 8-20% alcohol, but lower alcohol content can be found in products
such as wine coolers (included in Flavoured Alcoholic Beverages). Includes:

Still light wine, without carbonation, or fortification. Can be categorised by colour (Red, White or Rose),
by delimited area (eg AC, DOC, DOGC, QbA, QmP, etc) and by Country of Origin
Wine with carbonation, either naturally occurring as a by-product of fermentation, or artificially by the
injection of carbon dioxide. Includes semi-sparkling wines such as Perle, Frizzante and Cremant

PDF Editor

Champagne - sparkling wine produced using the 'Methode Champenoise' and produced in the
Champagne AC region of France
Made wine - low priced 'wine style drinks' made from grape concentrate and unique to the UK market

Spirits
Alcoholic liquid resulting from the distillation of such substances as fermented grape juice, grain, potatoes,
fruit, sugar cane. Includes Anise Spirits, Asian Spirits, Bitters, Brandy, Fruit Brandy, Gin & Genever, Liqueurs
& Specialities, Rum & Cane Spirit, Schnapps/Aquavit, Vodka, Whisky/Whiskey.

Flavoured Alcoholic Beverages (FABs)


Low-alcohol spirit mixes, often vodka or rum based, but may also be made with any spirit or neutral alcohol.
Sometimes known as 'alcopops'. In the USA, these products are usually made with malt derived alcohol,
known as 'malternatives' (to beer). Includes fruit based drinks, and pre-mixed versions of classic cocktails.
Includes wine coolers and Japanese Chu-Hi products (based on Shochu).

Wine Coolers
Low alcohol blends of wine and fruit juice (eg Sangria - traditional to Spain). Canadean includes wine coolers
within the flavoured alcoholic beverage category (FABs) and not in wine.

Fortified Wine
Wine 'fortified' by the addition of spirit which engenders a secondary fermentation. Usually around twice the
strength of light wine and about half the strength of spirits. Includes Sherry, Port, Madeira, Vermouth and
Apritif Wines. Canadean considers fortified wine to be an intermediate product, neither true wines, nor spirits.
They are, therefore, reported separately. Please note may include small volumes of unfortified vermouth.

Rice Wine
Asian alcoholic beverage produced from fermented rice, spring water and yeast.

Sake
Japanese alcoholic beverage brewed from fermented rice. Typically has an abv of 14-16%.

PDF Editor

Powder
ed CSD

Fruit
Powder
s

Country
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium
Bolivia
BosniaHerzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Republic of
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Latvia
Lebanon
Lithuania
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan

35.00
100.00
127.78
12.50
164.29

Powder
ed Iced
Coffee
Drinks

Powder
ed Iced
Tea
Drinks

Powder
ed
Sports
Drinks

Powder
ed
Energy
Drinks

67.50
104.55

25.00

90.00

90.00
90.00
100.00
82.14

80.00

27.00
76.90
45.45
3.85
4.80
45.00
125.00
10.00
9.00
76.90
13.53

5.30
120.00

10.00
7.50
22.00

14.50
40.00
115.00
76.90
125.00
100.00
127.78
8.33
14.29
12.50
129.87
12.50
10.00
19.27
45.45
9.00
5.00
85.00
16.60
45.00

67.65

90.00
100.00

30.30

Hot
Coffee Ground

Hot
Coffee Instant

15.62
9.00
15.62

83.33
10.00
55.55

9.00
25.64

16.00
10.00

6.00
43.00

83.33

12.50

119.00

15.62
13.33

83.33
120.00

15.62
7.41
8.00
15.62
12.50
15.62
15.62

83.33
24.00
83.33
119.00
34.48
41.66

10.00
6.66
14.22
16.00
15.62

47.60
42.86
83.33
56.00
170.06

104.55
38.30
85.00

10.00
61.76

29.00

79.00

46.00
80.00
100.00
100.00
90.00

80.00
20.91
80.00
80.00
100.00
60.00

76.90

74.00
230.00

67.65

75.00

100.00

100.00
71.43

15.62

9.09

19.00
12.50
42.00
10.00
110.00
133.00

100.00
30.30
31.10
45.00

Hot Tea

110.00

26.67
12.00
4.40
8.69

12.85
19.00
10.00
4.40

80.00
15.00
34.48
34.48

10.00
15.00
10.00
8.69
8.69

170.06
50.00

13.33

15.62

34.48

8.69

15.62
14.28

66.66
155.55

14.00

61.76

15.62

83.33

4.40

85.00

80.00
100.00
61.76

42.86
10.00
83.33

83.33
9.00
4.40
7.50

88.46

104.55

6.66
8.90
15.62
6.00
15.62

23.65
100.00
85.00

12.50
137.50

PDF Editor

80.00
80.00

White
Milk
Powder

22.55

28.00
100.00

15.62
20.00
12.00
15.62
15.62

70.00

130.00

Powder
ed CSD

Fruit
Powder
s

Country
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
UAE
Venezuela
Vietnam
United Kingdom

16.60
25.00
5.00
104.55
127.78
40.00
12.50

Powder
ed Iced
Coffee
Drinks

Powder
ed Iced
Tea
Drinks

Powder
ed
Sports
Drinks

85.00

61.76
68.55

140.00
62.50

104.55
90.00

104.55
70.00
104.55

30.00
12.50
76.90
120.00
110.00
76.90
45.00

20.00
76.90
100.00
45.00
191.67

40.00
70.00
104.55
45.00
10.00
28.00
10.45
12.50
10.45
6.25
105.26

Powder
ed
Energy
Drinks

138.50

29.00
90.00
138.50

80.00
80.00
70.00
78.90
80.00

90.00

85.00

67.64

63.64

71.88

35.00
104.55

Hot Tea

Hot
Coffee Ground

Hot
Coffee Instant

15.62

83.33

4.40

8.00
15.62
14.28
16.67

24.00
34.48

4.00
8.69
34.12
13.30

20.00
5.00

80.00

15.00
10.00

130.00

20.00
4.00
15.62
12.50
7.00
15.63
16.67
10.00
15.62
15.38

80.00

15.00
10.00
8.69

130.00

67.78

34.48
119.00
20.30
34.48
36.60
55.55
33.33

15.00
4.00
8.00
11.76

75.00
10.00

8.00

24.00

15.62

34.48

80.30

6.40
8.69
13.30
50.00
26.64
15.38
10.00
8.00
26.70

10.00

Source : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

8.69

White
Milk
Powder

Carbonates
Conc

Juice Conc

Nectars
Conc

Still Drinks
Conc

Squash/
Syrups

Country
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium
Bolivia
BosniaHerzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Republic of
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Latvia
Lebanon
Lithuania
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mexico
Moldova
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland

16.67
25.00

16.67
20.00
14.29
10.86
14.29
16.67

25.00

13.51
16.67

Squash/
Syrups
Super
Conc

Iced
Tea
Drinks
Conc

Sports
Drinks
Conc

16.70
16.67
20.00

14.29

16.60
16.67

25.00

25.00
18.40

18.52
20.00
17.24

33.30

33.30

16.67
16.67

20.00-25.00

8.13

16.70
16.67

15.60

15.60

16.67
18.82

33.30

33.30

16.67
24.00
33.30

33.30

33.30

33.30

9.09
6.15
22.72
18.40
10.00
12.50
14.29
11.76
12.50
22.50
10.86
6.25
12.50
13.33
12.50
14.20
14.29
7.69
5.88
20.00
15.50
20.00
14.29
20.00
14.29
16.67
12.50
11.76
12.50
25.00
10.00
12.50
20.00
12.50
16.67
15.00
12.50
20.00
6.67
13.42
20.00
12.50
9.09
9.09

PDF Editor

25.00

25.00

16.00

16.70

20.00
20.00

15.38

14.29

16.60
10.00

100.00

Carbonates
Conc

Juice Conc

16.67

7.81

16.67
13.51

18.13

Nectars
Conc

Still Drinks
Conc

Squash/
Syrups

12.50

10.00
10.00
15.50
16.67
11.90
15.50
12.50
11.76
14.29
14.30

Country
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Tunisia
Turkey
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
UAE
Venezuela
Vietnam
United Kingdom

16.67

25.00

20.00

7.81
20.00

20.00

16.67

14.29

18.00

Source : Trade Interviews; Canadean

PDF Editor

Squash/
Syrups
Super
Conc

Iced
Tea
Drinks
Conc

Sports
Drinks
Conc

16.67

9.10

20.00

16.67
15.63
16.70

8.33

20.00
1.32

10.00

16.70

14.28
20.00

10.00

20.00
14.29
14.29
25.00
14.29
10.00
16.67

2.50

12.50

'Packaging' is defined as all products made of any materials of any nature to be used for:
-

containment
protection
handling
delivery
presentation of goods

There are three categories of packaging:


primary (sales) packaging, around the goods at the point of purchase by the user or consumer
- secondary (collation) packaging, which groups a number of items together until the point of sale (eg
multi-packaging)
- tertiary (transit) packaging, which allows handling and transport of a number of grouped items as a unit
Canadean collects information on Primary Packaging - that is the container around the goods at the point of
purchase. This includes both consumer and food service packaging. Bulk dispensed beverages are packaged
in a bulk container (such as bag in box concentrate or barrel or bubble top), even if the beverage is dispensed
into a drinking vessel for consumption.
Some packaging is also intended to facilitate consumption of the beverage. This could be a can with a ring-pull
opening, a carton with a straw or a cup with a removable lid, for example.
Containers intended only to facilitate consumption of the beverage are not packaging. Glasses, mugs etc are
not packaging. A cup is only packaging if the cup has an integral lid to facilitate transportation. Beverages that
are dispensed into lidded paper cups with drinking straws at the point of sale to facilitate consumption are not
packaged in cups because the cups facilitate consumption and not handling and delivery.
Canadean collects information about packaging by listing a series of attributes which together describe the
package.
The attributes are:

pack type
pack material
pack size
refillable
carbonation
physical state
stability (JNSD only)

These attributes will each be described in turn:

Package Type Definitions


Bag in Box (bib)
A cardboard box with a foil or plastic liner usually used to contain a large quantity of beverage.
For vending machines where syrup from a bag in box is mixed with mains water and the beverage dispensed
into a pouch immediately before consumption, pouch is recorded as the packaging as this is the last
packaging utilised prior to consumption.

PDF Editor

Environmentally friendly bag in boxes whereby large pouches of beverage are purchased (usually for
commercial use) and designed to fit into a reusable plastic box are recorded as pouch as the beverage is
purchased by the pouch.
Barrel
A large traditional container made of wood, with a flat top and bottom and curved sides that make it fatter in
the middle, often used in the past to contain large quantities of beer. Sometimes known as a vat. A CO2 line
cannot be attached to a barrel.
Bottle
A container for liquids, usually made of glass or plastic, with a narrow neck. A bottle is usually made of one
piece of material, but can be 2 pieces seamed together.
Board Can
A container made of board with a metal top and bottom, made in three parts. Available in North America,
typically for frozen concentrated juice. Note: This is not an attribute in Wisdom but is included for reference
purposes.
Box
A square or rectangular container with stiff sides and sometimes a lid. A box is not usually made of laminated
material so would not usually be suitable for a liquid beverage.
Bubble Top
A large container usually used to supply water in large quantities, often used in a cool water dispenser, mainly
used in offices. In China bubble top containers are referred to as 'carboys'.
Can
A container made of aluminium or tinplate. The container can be cylindrical, rectangular or custom-shaped.
The can could be made of 2 or 3 parts.
Carton
A box made from laminated layers of board with or without aluminium foil lining. A laminated beverage
container made principally of board is a carton according to Canadean definitions, regardless of shape or the
name given by the manufacturer.
Pouch shaped cartons and pillow shaped cartons are recorded as cartons.
Cup
A container with a removable lid, often made of thin plastic, where the lid can be removed or pierced after
transportation to enable the container to then be used for consumption.
Demijohn
A large glass container, usually with handles to facilitate carrying, sometimes referred to as a bell jar.
Drum
A very large cylindrical container, usually made of three parts.
Jar
A container with a wide mouth, usually used to store powders or thick liquids such as foods. The neck should
be so short that the lid almost touches the body of the container. The neck should be almost as wide as the
base of the container. Jars usually have a screw top.
Containers for juice that have a neck that is almost as wide as the body of the container but have a neck that
is long enough to prevent the lid from touching the body of the container are classified as a bottle.
Keg
A cylindrical container usually made of metal and used for storing beer or other alcoholic drinks. A CO2 line is
often attached to a keg to dispense beer through a font.

PDF Editor

Pouch
A package made of flexible material that can stand unsupported, usually made of two pieces of plastic or foil
seamed together to form a package with a definite base to stand on.
For vending machines where syrup from a bag in box is mixed with mains water and the beverage dispensed
into a pouch immediately before consumption, pouch is recorded as the packaging as this is the last
packaging utilised prior to consumption.
Environmentally friendly bag in boxes whereby large pouches of beverage are purchased (usually for
commercial use) and designed to fit into a reusable plastic box are recorded as pouch as the beverage is
purchased by the pouch.
Sachet
A small container, usually made of only one piece of paper or plastic, often containing only a small quantity
that is not designed to stand unsupported. Sachets can be used for liquid beverages and powders. Includes
pillow pouch unless made of laminated board, in which case, the package is a carton.
Tank
A large closed container for liquid where the beverage is dispensed via a valve.
Tub

A small container with a removable lid, usually as wide as the base, often used to store powdered
beverages. The lid of a tub is usually removed by lifting, not by unscrewing.
Tube
A long thin container made of soft metal or plastic, which is closed at one end and has a small hole at the
other, usually with a cover, and which is used for storing thick liquids.
Unpackaged
Products that have never been packaged eg products which are sold by the cup on the street. Where a
commercial container is used to dispense beverages by the cup, the commercial container should be recorded
by pack material, pack type and size eg metal barrel 4,000cl. However, beverages that are never packaged
prior to consumption, such as a juice squeezed from fruit on demand, should be recorded as unpackaged.
Water from in-store water filtration machines where the water is piped directly from the mains and filtered by
the machine ie the machine is not refilled with bag in boxes and the customer usually brings their own refillable
container may be recorded as unpackaged.

Packaging Material
Packaging materials are the materials used in the manufacture of packaging and includes raw materials and
processed materials prior to their conversion into packaging.
Few packages are made solely of one material. The information that Canadean collects refers to the principal
material used to construct the pack.
Most containers are coated in the inside to protect the beverage and coated on the outside for cosmetic or
printing purposes. Many containers are made of several layers of packaging material. The focus is on the
main material.
Options are:
Board
Containers made of cardboard ie several layers of fiberous wood pulp, often known as paperboard. Containers
are commonly coated in polyethylene and lined with foil, but are recorded as board if board is the main
material of the package.

PDF Editor

Cornstarch
Biodegradable containers made of polylactic acid (usually derived from corn starch, occasionally derived from
sugar cane), sometimes abbreviated to PLA. Like PET, PLA is clear, tough and can be clear or coloured.
Bottles are blown into a mould, resulting in a dot on the base of the bottle. Blown bottles are stronger than
heat seamed bottles. PLA bottles are one of a number of materials with a number 7 in the triangle symbol.
Cornstarch bottles are usually very clearly labelled in order to position their biodegradable properties. PLA can
easily be identified as its heat resistant properties are inferior to most plastics. 100% cornstarch bottle will melt
if filled with liquid at 50C (very hot tap water). For this reason, most containers are a mixture of PLA and other
ingredients. Containers made of a PLA mix cannot usually hold liquid above 80C (hot coffee). To be recorded
as cornstarch, the container should contain at least 50% PLA.
Foil
A very thin sheet of metal, especially used to wrap food in to keep it fresh. Foil is used to keep the beverage
fresh and is a component of many pack types. A container is only recorded as foil if foil is the dominant
material in the package. For example, many cartons have a foil liner, but a carton cannot be made of foil.
Glass
An inorganic substance fused at high temperature and cooled quickly so that it solidifies into a vitreous and
non-crystalline state so that, although the molecular structure is similar to that of a liquid, the mass is rigid.
In a packaging context glass containers are continuously moulded in a furnace at high temperature (over 1300
C) into narrow neck bottles or wide-mouth jars using a mixture of chemicals derived from sand, limestone,
soda and metal silicates. Amber (brown), green, blue and opal (clear) colour variants can be produced by
varying the specific chemical mix. Glass containers generally offer the advantages of relatively high
transparency, rigidity, temperature stability and resistance to thermal shock, but the disadvantages of higher
weight and fragility compared with alternative packaging media.
HDPE
Containers made of High Density Polyethylene. HDPE containers are produced in two parts and joined with a
heat seam. The weakness of the seam makes these bottles unsuitable for carbonated drinks. Unpigmented
bottles are translucent, have good barrier properties and stiffness and are well suited to packaging products
with a short shelf-life, such as milk. Pigmented HDPE bottles have better stress crack resistance than
unpigmented HDPE bottles. HDPE bottle are normally opaque (unpigmented) or white. HDPE bottles can be
identified by the number 2 in the triangle symbol.
LDPE
Containers made of Low Density Polyethylene. LDPE containers are very soft and flexible and are used
predominately in film applications due to its toughness, flexibility and relative transparency, making it popular
for use in applications where heat sealing is necessary. LDPE is also used to manufacture some flexible lids
and, very rarely, bottles. LDPE bottle can be identified by the number 4 in the triangle symbol.
Metal
Packaging made from a common metal element such as aluminium, tinplate, steel or a mixture of metals.
(There is no requirement to state which metal or combination of metals the container is made from).
Containers may be coated or covered in a label.
Paper
A thin flat material which is made from crushed wood or cloth. Paper would usually only be used to make
sachets. Cartons are made of board and paper cups are a vessel to facilitate consumption and not a pack
type.
PEN
Containers made of Polyethylene Naphthalate. These shiny, translucent blown bottles have excellent oxygen
barrier properties. Similar in appearance to PC and also marked with the 7 symbol, PEN bottles are refillable
(20 times) and are fully recyclable at the end of their life.
PET
Containers made of Polyethylene Terephthalate, sometimes abbreviated to PET or PETE. PET is clear, tough
and has good gas and moisture barrier properties. Bottles are blown into a mould, resulting in a dot on the
base of the bottle. Blown bottles are stronger than heat seamed bottles. PET bottles can be identified by a

PDF Editor

number 1 in the triangle symbol or, when burned, by the smell of wax and dripping like a candle without
smoke.
Polycarbonate
Containers made of Polycarbonate (PC). Polycarbonate has good chemical resistance and is strong. PC is
normally used for thick, heavy containers such as bubble tops. Polycarbonate is one of many materials
marked with the number 7 in the triangle symbol and can be identified by the yellowish sooty smoke and
sweetish smell when burnt.
Polypropylene
Containers made of Polypropylene (PP). Polypropylene has good chemical resistance, is strong, and has a
high melting point making it good for hot-fill liquids. Polypropylene is found in flexible and rigid packaging.
Polypropylene can be identified by the number 5 in the triangle symbol or, when burnt, by the smell of burnt oil
and dripping without smoke.
Polystyrene
Containers made of Polystyrene (PS). A rigid opaque packaging, that is often brittle and glossy. Very thin,
lightweight containers are often made of polystyrene. Unpigmented bottles are translucent and are well suited
to packaging products with a short shelf-life such as dairy products. Bottles are injected into a mould, resulting
in a dot on the base of the bottle. Polystyrene bottles can be identified by the number 6 in the triangle symbol
and a greenish bubble effect when burnt.
PVC
Containers made of Polyvinyl Chloride. In addition to its stable physical properties, PVC has good chemical
resistance. The diverse slate of vinyl products can be broadly divided into rigid and flexible materials. PVC
bottles are made in two parts and joined with a heat seam, making this bottle unsuitable for carbonated drinks.
Upon close inspection, transparent PVC bottles can be seen to be slightly opaque. PVC bottles can be
identified by the number 3 in the triangle symbol, or by the black smoke and acrid smell given when burned.

Refillability
Refillable
A container designed to be refilled; taken back to point of purchase (not necessarily the same one) by the
consumer in order to be refilled with the same, or similar, liquid product. This usually involves a monetary
deposit, refundable on return of bottle. The bottle may be refilled on site, or directed to local filler.
This is not to be confused with recyclable bottles, which may be termed returnable for the purpose of
recycling.
Barrels, kegs and tanks are considered to be refillable.
Non-Refillable
Bottle designed for single usage only. It can be returned to point of purchase, or taken to a recycling facility,
but is not refilled.
Carbonation
Indicates the level of carbonation of the product contained within the package.
Options are:
Low
Regular
No Carbonation

Physical State
This describes the physical state of the product within the package.
Options are:
Powder

PDF Editor

Concentrate
Ready to Drink (rtd)

Stability
Defines the technical shelf stability. Options are:
Short-life - products which need to be chilled in order to remain shelf stable (typically have a shelf-life of 7
days)
Long-life - products which do not need to be chilled to remain shelf stable
Note: Frozen is classed as long-life.

PDF Editor

Packaging
Single-serve
Multi-serve
Rb/ref
nr/nrb/non-ref
PET
refPET
nrPET
PVC
HDPE
LDPE
PC
PEN
PS
BinB

pack size <60cl


pack size between 61cl and 1,000cl. This category also includes bulk
packaging, but excludes Bulk/HOD water volume
Refillable bottle (glass)
Non-refillable bottle (glass)
Polyethylene terephthalate
Refillable polyethylene terephthalate
Non-refillable polyethylene terephthalate
Polyvinyl chloride
High density polyethylene
Low density polyethylene
Polycarbonate
Polyethylene Naphthalate
Polystyrene
Bag in box - includes pre-mix/post-mix (fountain)

Distribution:
Off-premise
Volume sold for 'subsequent consumption' away from the place of purchase, comprising:
Modern Retail:
- Large Modern: Supermarkets, hypermarkets, department stores (Karstadt): modern facilities, typically
with electronic tills, barcode scanning and multiple checkout
- Convenience: Stores such as 7-11, garage forecourts - typically small food stores with long opening
hours, often selling ready meals and fast food
- Discount: Hard discounter stores, such as Lidl and Aldi, where focus is on low pricing.
Traditional Retail: Traditional food stores: mom & pop style, CTNs, delis, pharmacies/drugstores. Street
stalls
and kiosks (not for immediate consumption).
Specialist Beverage Retailer: Off-licences, liquor stores, specialist drinks shops.
Home Delivery: On-line/telephone/mail order, deliveries to home address.
On-premise
Volume sold for immediate consumption at the place of purchase, comprising:
Vending: Automatic merchandising machines selling (usually) branded beverages.
QSR: Quick Service restaurants. Payment is made prior to consumption.
EDA Places: Eating, Drinking & Accommodation. Eating: establishments where beverage consumption is
generally an accompaniment to a meal. Payment is made after consumption. Drinking: establishments
primarily engaged in the sale of drinks for consumption on premise. Accommodation: establishments where
the primary function is to provide accommodation facilities
Institutions: Workplaces, hospitals, nursing homes, schools, universities, prisons, military.
Other On-premise: Such as cinemas, street stalls and kiosks, travel and transport, leisure (including
gyms/health clubs etc) and events.

PDF Editor

Other commonly used abbreviations


A&P
Abv
BOGOF
CAGR
CEFTA
CPI
CTNs
CSD
E/e
EDLP
ESL
EU
(Year)F
(Year)P
FABs
Fmcg/FMCG
GDP
HL/hl
HOD
Horeca
JNSD
LPA
na
NFC
Non-rtd
Per cap
PL
PPP
rtd
SKUs
VAT

Advertising and promotion


Alcohol by volume
Buy one get one free
Compound annual growth rate
Central European Free Trade Agreement
Consumer Price Index
Confectioners, tobacconists, newsagents
Carbonates
Estimate
Everyday low price
Extended shelf life
European Union
Forecast
Provisional
Flavoured alcoholic beverages
Fast-moving consumer goods
Gross domestic product
Hectolitres (100 litres)
Home & office delivery
Hotels, restaurants and cafes
Juice, nectars, still drinks
Litres of pure alcohol
Not available/Not applicable
Not from concentrate
Not ready to drink
Per capita
Private Label (distributors own label; DOBs; retailers own label)
Purchasing power parity
Ready to drink
Stock keeping units
Value added tax

PDF Editor

PDF Editor

You might also like