Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
Introduction
CONOMISTS have long been aware that Jensens inequality implies that E(ln y) ln E(y), that is, the
expected value of the logarithm of a random variable is
different from the logarithm of its expected value. This
basic fact, however, has been neglected in many econometric applications. Indeed, one important implication of Jensens inequality is that the standard practice of interpreting
the parameters of log-linearized models estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS) as elasticities can be highly misleading in the presence of heteroskedasticity.
Although many authors have addressed the problem of
obtaining consistent estimates of the conditional mean of
the dependent variable when the model is estimated in the
log linear form (see, for example, Goldberger, 1968; Manning & Mullahy, 2001), we were unable to find any reference in the literature to the potential bias of the elasticities
estimated using the log linear model.
In this paper we use the gravity equation for trade as a
particular illustration of how the bias arises and propose an
appropriate estimator. We argue that the gravity equation,
and, more generally, constant-elasticity models, should be
estimated in their multiplicative form and propose a simple
pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PML) estimation technique.
Besides being consistent in the presence of heteroskedasticity, this method also provides a natural way to deal with
zero values of the dependent variable.
Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compare the performance of our estimator with that of OLS (in the log linear
specification). The results are striking. In the presence of
heteroskedasticity, estimates obtained using log-linearized
Received for publication March 29, 2004. Revision accepted for publication September 13, 2005.
* ISEG/Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa and CEMAPRE; and London
School of Economics, CEP, and CEPR, respectively.
We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their constructive
comments and suggestions. We also thank Francesco Caselli, Kevin
Denny, Juan Carlos Hallak, Daniel Mota, John Mullahy, Paulo Parente,
Manuela Simarro, and Kim Underhill for helpful advice on previous
versions of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies. Jiaying Huang
provided excellent research assistance. Santos Silva gratefully acknowledges the partial financial support from Fundacao para a Ciencia e
Tecnologia, program POCTI, partially funded by FEDER. A previous
version of this paper circulated as Gravity-Defying Trade.
642
(1)
(2)
(3)
Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) argue that the traditional gravity equation is not correctly specified, as it does
not take into account multilateral resistance terms. One of
the solutions for this problem that is suggested by those
authors is to augment the traditional gravity equation with
exporter and importer fixed effects, leading to
T ij 0 Y i 1Y j 2D ij 3e id i jd j,
(4)
(5)
4 Trade data can suffer from many other forms of errors, as described in
Feenstra, Lipsey, and Bowen (1997).
5 Note that, throughout the paper, T denotes exports from i to j.
ij
643
As before, log-linearization of equation (5) raises the problem of how to treat zero-value observations. Moreover,
given that equation (5) is a multiplicative model, it is also
subject to the biases caused by log-linearization in the
presence of heteroskedasticity. Naturally, the presence of
the individual effects may reduce the severity of this problem, but whether or not that happens is an empirical issue.
In our empirical analysis we provide estimates for both
the traditional and the Andersonvan Wincoop gravity equations, using alternative estimation methods. We show that,
in practice, heteroskedasticity is quantitatively and qualitatively important in the gravity equation, even when controlling for fixed effects. Hence, we recommend estimating the
augmented gravity equation in levels, using the proposed
PML estimator, which also adequately deals with the zerovalue observations.
III.
Constant-Elasticity Models
Despite their immense popularity, empirical studies involving gravity equations still have important econometric
flaws. These flaws are not exclusive to this literature, but
extend to many areas where constant-elasticity models are
used. This section examines how the deterministic multiplicative models suggested by economic theory can be used in
empirical studies.
In their nonstochastic form, the relationship between the
multiplicative constant-elasticity model and its log linear
additive formulation is trivial. The problem, of course, is
that economic relations do not hold with the accuracy of
physical laws. All that can be expected is that they hold on
average. Indeed, here we interpret economic models like the
gravity equation as yielding the expected value of the
variable of interest, y 0, for a given value of the explanatory variables, x (see Goldberger, 1991, p. 5). That is, if
economic theory suggests that y and x are linked by a
constant-elasticity model of the form yi exp (xi), the
function exp(xi) is interpreted as the conditional expectation of yi given x, denoted E[yix].6 For example, using the
notation in the previous section, the multiplicative gravity
relationship can be written as the exponential function exp
[ln 0 1 ln Yi 2 ln Yj 3 ln Dij], which is interpreted
as the conditional expectation E(TijYi, Yj, Dij).
Because the relation yi exp(xi) holds on average but
not for each i, an error term is associated with each observation, which is defined as i yi E[yix].7 Therefore, the
stochastic model can be formulated as
6 Notice that if exp(x ) is interpreted as describing the conditional
i
median of yi (or some other conditional quantile) rather than the conditional expectation, estimates of the elasticities of interest can be obtained
estimating the log linear model using the appropriate quantile regression
estimator (Koenker & Bassett, 1978). However, interpreting exp(xi) as a
conditional median is problematic when yi has a large mass of zero
observations, as in trade data. Indeed, in this case the conditional median
of yi will be a discontinuous function of the regressors, which is generally
not compatible with standard economic theory.
7 Whether the error enters additively or multiplicatively is irrelevant for
our purposes, as explained below.
644
y i expxi i ,
(6)
(7)
y expx b ,
n
arg min
i1
i1
(8)
i1
y i expxi xi 0.
(9)
645
y expx exp x x 0.
n
i1
646
(10)
(11)
where yi denotes the estimated value of E[yix]. Unfortunately, as the discussion in the previous sections should
have made clear, this approach based on the loglinearization of equation (10) is valid only under very
restrictive conditions on the conditional distribution of yi.
However, it is easy to see that this procedure is valid when
the constant-elasticity model can be consistently estimated
in the log linear form. Therefore, using equation (11) a test
for H0 : 1 2 based on a nonrobust covariance estimator
provides a check on the adequacy of the estimator based on
the log linear model.
A more robust alternative, which is mentioned by Manning and Mullahy (2001) in a footnote, is to estimate 1
from
15 Frankel and Wei (1993) and Frankel (1997) suggest that larger
countries should be given more weight in the estimation of gravity
equations. This would be appropriate if the errors in the model were just
the result of measurement errors in the dependent variable. However, if it
is accepted that the gravity equation does not hold exactly, measurement
errors account for only part of the dispersion of trade data around the
gravity equation.
16 It is worth noting that the PPML estimator can be easily adapted to
deal with endogenous regressors (Windmeijer & Santos Silva, 1997) and
panel data (Wooldridge, 1999). These extensions, however, are not pursued here.
y i y i 2 0 y i 1 i ,
(12)
0 1 1ln yi yi *i
(13)
A Simulation Study
y i y i 2 / y i 0 y i 0 x i y i i* ,
and the test could be performed by checking the joint significance of the
elements of 0. If the model includes a constant, one of the regressors in
the auxiliary regression is redundant and should be dropped.
(14)
(15)
647
648
UNDER
DIFFERENT FORMS
OF
HETEROSKEDASTICITY
Bias
2
S.E.
Bias
1
S.E.
Bias
S.E.
Bias
S.E.
0.01886
0.00195
0.10946
0.49981
0.22121
0.37752
0.017
0.008
0.096
0.030
0.026
0.015
0.02032
0.00274
0.09338
0.49968
0.21339
0.34997
0.029
0.018
0.108
0.032
0.036
0.024
0.02190
0.00262
0.13243
0.45518
0.24405
0.39401
0.020
0.033
0.073
0.028
0.026
0.016
0.02334
0.00360
0.11331
0.45513
0.23889
0.36806
0.041
0.057
0.087
0.033
0.040
0.028
0.02332
0.23959
0.17134
0.36480
0.41006
0.48564
0.091
3.082
0.068
0.043
0.037
0.022
0.02812
0.07852
0.14442
0.36789
0.41200
0.46597
0.133
1.521
0.104
0.056
0.060
0.040
0.104
7.521
0.085
0.047
0.040
0.022
0.01856
0.09239
0.10245
0.46225
0.46173
0.56039
0.146
1.829
0.129
0.060
0.066
0.044
Case 1: V [ yix] 1
PPML
NLS
GPML
OLS
ET-tobit
OLS( y 0.5)
OLS( y 1)
0.00004
0.00006
0.01276
0.39008
0.47855
0.16402
0.40237
0.016
0.008
0.068
0.039
0.030
0.027
0.014
0.00009
0.00003
0.00754
0.35568
0.47786
0.15487
0.37683
0.027
0.017
0.082
0.054
0.032
0.038
0.022
0.00011
0.00046
0.00376
0.21076
0.42394
0.17868
0.42371
0.019
0.033
0.043
0.030
0.028
0.026
0.015
0.00009
0.00066
0.00211
0.19960
0.42316
0.17220
0.39931
0.039
0.057
0.062
0.049
0.033
0.043
0.025
0.00526
0.23539
0.00047
0.00015
0.31908
0.34480
0.51804
0.091
3.066
0.041
0.032
0.044
0.039
0.021
0.00228
0.07323
0.00029
0.00003
0.32161
0.34614
0.50000
0.130
1.521
0.083
0.064
0.058
0.064
0.038
0.00696
0.35139
0.00322
0.13270
0.29908
0.39217
0.51440
0.103
7.516
0.057
0.039
0.049
0.042
0.021
0.00647
0.08801
0.00137
0.12542
0.42731
0.41391
0.58087
0.144
1.827
0.083
0.075
0.063
0.070
0.041
0.02027
0.35672
0.12831
0.34351
0.45188
0.48627
cases. Moreover, although some loss of efficiency is noticeable as one moves away from case 2, in which it is an
optimal estimator, the biases of the PPML are always
small.21 Moreover, the results obtained with rounded data
suggest that the Poisson-based PML estimator is relatively
robust to this form of measurement error of the dependent
variable. Indeed, the bias introduced by the rounding-off
errors in the dependent variable is relatively small, and in
some cases it even compensates the bias found in the first
set of experiments. Therefore, because it is simple to implement and reliable in a wide variety of situations, the
Poisson PML estimator has the essential characteristics
needed to make it the new workhorse for the estimation of
constant-elasticity models.
Obviously, the sign and magnitude of the bias of the
estimators studied here depend on the particular specification considered. Therefore, the results of these experiments
cannot serve as an indicator of what can be expected in
other situations. However, it is clear that, apart from the
Poisson PML method, all estimators will often be very
misleading.
These experiments were also used to study the finitesample performance of the Gauss-Newton regression
(GNR) test for the adequacy of the Poisson PML based on
equation (13) and of the Park test advocated by Manning
and Mullahy (2001), which, as explained above, is valid
only to check for the adequacy of the estimator based on the
log linear model.22 Given that the Poisson PML estimator is
the only estimator with a reasonable behavior under all the
cases considered, these tests were performed using residuals
and estimates of (xi) from the Poisson regression. Table
2 contains the rejection frequencies of the null hypothesis at
the 5% nominal level for both tests in the four cases
considered in the two sets of experiments. In this table the
rejection frequencies under the null hypothesis are given in
bold.
In as much as both tests have adequate behavior under the
null and reveal reasonable power against a wide range of
alternatives, the results suggest that these tests are important
tools to assess the adequacy of the standard OLS estimator
of the log linear model and of the proposed Poisson PML
estimator.
V.
In this section, we use the PPML estimator to quantitatively assess the determinants of bilateral trade flows, uncovering significant differences in the roles of various
measures of size and distance from those predicted by the
21 These results are in line with those reported by Manning and Mullahy
(2001).
22 To illustrate the pitfalls of the procedure suggested by Manning and
Mullahy (2001), we note that the means of the estimates of 1 obtained
using equation (11) in cases 1, 2, and 3 (without measurement error) were
0.58955, 1.29821, and 1.98705, whereas the true values of 1 in these
cases are, respectively, 0, 1, and 2.
649
GNR Test
Park Test
0.91980
0.05430
0.58110
0.49100
1.00000
1.00000
0.06680
0.40810
0.91740
0.14980
0.57170
0.47580
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
650
OLS
ln(Tij)
OLS
ln(1 Tij)
Tobit
ln(a Tij)
NLS
Tij
PPML
Tij 0
PPML
Tij
0.938**
(0.012)
0.798**
(0.012)
0.207**
(0.017)
0.106**
(0.018)
1.166**
(0.034)
0.314*
(0.127)
0.678**
(0.067)
0.397**
(0.070)
0.062
(0.062)
0.665**
(0.060)
0.467**
(0.079)
0.205*
(0.085)
0.491**
(0.097)
0.170**
(0.053)
9613
0.000
1.128**
(0.011)
0.866**
(0.012)
0.277**
(0.018)
0.217**
(0.018)
1.151**
(0.040)
0.241
(0.201)
0.742**
(0.067)
0.392**
(0.070)
0.106*
(0.054)
0.278**
(0.055)
0.526**
(0.087)
0.109
(0.091)
1.289**
(0.124)
0.739**
(0.050)
18360
0.000
1.058**
(0.012)
0.847**
(0.011)
0.227**
(0.015)
0.178**
(0.015)
1.160**
(0.034)
0.225
(0.152)
0.759**
(0.060)
0.416**
(0.063)
0.038
(0.052)
0.479**
(0.051)
0.563**
(0.068)
0.032
(0.073)
0.729**
(0.103)
0.310**
(0.045)
18360
0.204
0.738**
(0.038)
0.862**
(0.041)
0.396**
(0.116)
0.033
(0.062)
0.924**
(0.072)
0.081
(0.100)
0.689**
(0.085)
0.036
(0.125)
1.367**
(0.202)
0.471**
(0.184)
1.188**
(0.182)
1.010**
(0.154)
0.443**
(0.109)
0.928**
(0.191)
18360
0.000
0.721**
(0.027)
0.732**
(0.028)
0.154**
(0.053)
0.133**
(0.044)
0.776**
(0.055)
0.202
(0.105)
0.752**
(0.134)
0.019
(0.150)
0.873**
(0.157)
0.704**
(0.141)
0.647**
(0.135)
0.549**
(0.120)
0.179*
(0.090)
0.139
(0.133)
9613
0.941
0.733**
(0.027)
0.741**
(0.027)
0.157**
(0.053)
0.135**
(0.045)
0.784**
(0.055)
0.193
(0.104)
0.746**
(0.135)
0.024
(0.150)
0.864**
(0.157)
0.697**
(0.141)
0.660**
(0.134)
0.561**
(0.118)
0.181*
(0.088)
0.107
(0.131)
18360
0.331
ficients differoftentimes significantlyfrom those obtained using OLS. This suggests that in this case, heteroskedasticity (rather than truncation) is responsible for the
differences between PPML results and those of OLS using
only the observations with positive exports. Further evidence on the importance of the heteroskedasticity is provided by the two-degrees-of-freedom special case of
Whites test for heteroskedasticity (see Wooldridge, 2002, p.
127), which leads to a test statistic of 476.6 and to a p-value
of 0. That is, the null hypothesis of homoskedastic errors is
unequivocally rejected.
Poisson estimates reveal that the coefficients on importers and exporters GDPs in the traditional equation are not,
as generally believed, close to 1. The estimated GDP elasticities are just above 0.7 (s.e. 0.03). OLS generates
significantly larger estimates, especially on exporters GDP
(0.94, s.e. 0.01). Although all these results are conditional
on the particular specification used,25 it is worth pointing out
that unit income elasticities in the simple gravity framework
are at odds with the observation that the trade-to-GDP ratio
decreases with increasing total GDP, or, in other words, that
smaller countries tend to be more open to international
trade.26
24 The reason why truncation has little effect in this case is that
observations with zero trade correspond to pairs for which the estimated
value of trade is close to zero. Therefore, the corresponding residuals are
also close to zero, and their elimination from the sample has little effect.
25 This result holds when one looks at the subsample of OECD countries.
It is also robust to the exclusion of GDP per capita from the regressions.
26 Note also that PPML predicts almost equal coefficients for the GDPs
of exporters and importers.
B. Results
OF
HETEROSKEDASTICITY
Exports 0
Full Sample
0.144
0.000
0.115
0.000
OF THE
651
652
Log distance
Contiguity dummy
Common-language dummy
Colonial-tie dummy
Free-trade agreement dummy
Fixed effects
Observations
RESET test p-values
OLS
ln (Tij)
OLS
ln (1 Tij)
Tobit
ln (a Tij)
NLS
Tij
PPML
Tij 0
PPML
Tij
1.347**
(0.031)
0.174
(0.130)
0.406**
(0.068)
0.666**
(0.070)
0.310**
(0.098)
Yes
9613
0.000
1.332**
(0.036)
0.399*
(0.189)
0.550**
(0.066)
0.693**
(0.067)
0.174
(0.138)
Yes
18360
0.000
1.272**
(0.029)
0.253
(0.135)
0.485**
(0.057)
0.650**
(0.059)
0.137**
(0.098)
Yes
18360
0.000
0.582**
(0.088)
0.458**
(0.121)
0.926**
(0.116)
0.736**
(0.178)
1.017**
(0.170)
Yes
18360
0.000
0.770**
(0.042)
0.352**
(0.090)
0.418**
(0.094)
0.038
(0.134)
0.374**
(0.076)
Yes
9613
0.564
0.750**
(0.041)
0.370**
(0.091)
0.383**
(0.093)
0.079
(0.134)
0.376**
(0.077)
Yes
18360
0.112
means that the model estimated using the logarithmic specification is inappropriate. A similar result is found for the
OLS estimated using ln(1 Tij) as the dependent variable
and for the NLS. In contrast, the models estimated using the
Poisson regressions pass the RESET test, that is, the RESET
test provides no evidence of misspecification of the gravity
equations estimated using the PPML. With this particular
specification, the model estimated using tobit also passes
the test for the traditional gravity equation.
Finally, we also check whether the particular pattern of
heteroskedasticity assumed by the models is appropriate. As
explained in section III B, the adequacy of the log linear
model was checked using the Park-type test, whereas the
hypothesis V[yix] (xi) was tested by evaluating the
significance of the coefficient of (ln yi)yi in the GaussNewton regression indicated in equation (13). The p-values
of the tests are reported in table 4. Again, the log linear
specification is unequivocally rejected. On the other hand,
these results indicate that the estimated coefficient on (ln yi)
yi is insignificantly different from 0 at the usual 5% level.
This implies that the Poisson PML assumption V[yix]
0E[yix] cannot be rejected at this significance level.
The Andersonvan Wincoop Gravity Equation: Table 5
presents the estimated coefficients for the Andersonvan
Wincoop (2003) gravity equation, which controls more
properly for multilateral resistance terms by introducing
exporter- and importer-specific effects. As before, the columns show, respectively, the estimated coefficients obtained
using OLS on the log of exports, OLS on ln(1 Tij), tobit,
NLS, PPML on the positive-trade sample, and PPML. Note
that, because this exercise uses cross-sectional data, we can
only identify bilateral variables.29
29 Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) impose unit income elasticities by
using as the dependent variable the log of exports divided by the product
of the countries GDPs. Because we are working with cross-sectional data
and the model specification includes importer and exporter fixed effects,
income elasticities cannot be identified, and there is no need to impose
restrictions on them. Still, the estimation of the PML models could be
performed using as the dependent variable the ratio of exports to the
product of the GDPs. This would downweight the observations with large
OF
HETEROSKEDASTICITY
Exports 0
Full Sample
0.100
0.000
0.070
0.000
OF THE
Conclusions
In this paper, we argue that the standard empirical methods used to estimate gravity equations are inappropriate.
30 It is worth noting that the large differences in estimates among the
various methods persist when we look at a smaller subsample of countries
that account for most of world trade and, quite likely, have better data.
More specifically, we run similar regressions for the subsample of 63
countries included in Frankels (1997) study. These countries accounted
for almost 90% of the world trade reported to the United Nations in 1992.
One advantage of this subsample is that the number of zeros is significantly reduced. Heteroskedasticity, however, is still a problem: The null
hypothesis of homoskedasticity is rejected in both the traditional and the
fixed-effects gravity equations. As with the full sample, PPML generates
a smaller role for distance and common language than OLS, and, unlike
OLS, PPML predicts no role for colonial ties. In line with the findings
documented in Frankel (1997), the OLS estimated coefficient on the
free-trade-agreement dummy is negative in both specifications of the
gravity equation, whereas PPML predicts a positive and significant effect
(slightly bigger than that found for the whole sample). These results are
availableon requestfrom the authors.
653
654
655
APPENDIX
TABLE A1.LIST
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium-Lux.
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Rep.
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo Dem. Rep.
Congo Rep.
Costa Rica
Cote DIvoire
Cyprus
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Rep.
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eq. Guinea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
OF
COUNTRIES
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Rep.
Laos P. Dem. Rep.
Lebanon
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Nepal
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Solomon Islands
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
St. Kitts and Nevis
Sudan
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Rep.
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
United Arab Em.
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
656
AND
SECOND LANGUAGES
English
French
Spanish
Dutch
Australia
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Brunei
Cameroon
Canada
Fiji
Gambia
Ghana
Guyana
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Jamaica
Jordan
Kenya
Kiribati
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Malta
Mauritius
New Zealand
Nigeria
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Rwanda
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
South Africa
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Kitts and Nevis
Suriname
Tanzania
Trinidad and Tobago
Uganda
United Kingdom
United States
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Belgium-Lux.
Benin
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo Dem. Rep.
Congo Rep.
Cote DIvoire
Djibouti
Eq. Guinea
France
Gabon
Guinea
Haiti
Lebanon
Madagascar
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
New Caledonia
Niger
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Switzerland
Togo
Tunisia
Argentina
Belize
Bolivia
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Rep.
Ecuador
El Salvador
Eq. Guinea
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Spain
Uruguay
Venezuela
Belgium-Lux.
Netherlands
Suriname
Malay
Brunei
Indonesia
Malaysia
Singapore
Portuguese
Angola
Brazil
Guinea-Bissau
Mozambique
Portugal
German
Austria
Germany
Switzerland
Greek
Cyprus
Greece
Hungarian
Hungary
Romania
Italian
Arabic
Algeria
Bahrain
Chad
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Israel
Jordan
Lebanon
Mauritania
Morocco
Oman
Saudi Arabia
Sudan
Syria
Tanzania
Tunisia
United Arab Em.
Yemen
Turkish
Cyprus
Turkey
Italy
Switzerland
Lingala
Congo Dem. Rep.
Congo Rep.
Russian
Mongolia
Russian Federation
Swahili
Kenya
Tanzania
Chinese
China
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Singapore
657
Mauritius
New Zealand
Nigeria
Pakistan
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Tanzania
Trinidad and Tobago
Uganda
United States
Zambia
Zimbabwe
France
Spain
Algeria
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Central African Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Djibouti
Gabon
Guinea
Haiti
Laos
Lebanon
Madagascar
Mali
Mauritania
Morocco
Niger
Senegal
Syria
Togo
Tunisia
Vietnam
Argentina
Bolivia
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Ecuador
El Salvador
Eq. Guinea
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Venezuela
Portugal
IN
Angola
Brazil
Guinea-Bissau
Mozambique
Oman
1990
EEC/EC
CARICOM
CACM
Belgium
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Portugal
Spain
United Kingdom
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Dominican Rep.
Guyana
Haiti
Jamaica
Trinidad and Tobago
St. Kitts and Nevis
Suriname
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Nicaragua
EFTA
SPARTECA
Iceland
Norway
Switzerland
Liechtenstein
Australia
New Zealand
Fiji
Kiribati
Papua New Guinea
Solomon Islands
CER
PATCRA
Australia
New Zealand
Australia
Papua New Guinea
Bilateral Agreements
EC-Cyprus
EC-Malta
EC-Egypt
EC-Syria
EC-Algeria
EC-Norway
EC-Iceland
EC-Switzerland
CanadaUnited States
IsraelUnited States
658
Full Sample
Variable
Mean
Std. Dev.
Mean
Std. Dev.
Trade
Log of trade
Log of exporters GDP
Log of importers GDP
Log of exporters per capita GDP
Log of importers per capita GDP
Log of distance
Contiguity dummy
Common-language dummy
Colonial-tie dummy
Landlocked exporter dummy
Landlocked importer dummy
Exporters remoteness
Importers remoteness
Preferentialtrade-agreement dummy
Openness dummy
172132.2
23.24975
23.24975
7.50538
7.50538
8.78551
0.01961
0.20970
0.17048
0.15441
0.15441
8.94654
8.94654
0.02505
0.56373
1828720
2.39727
2.39727
1.63986
1.63986
0.74168
0.13865
0.40710
0.37606
0.36135
0.36135
0.26389
0.26389
0.15629
0.49594
328757.7
8.43383
24.42503
24.13243
8.09600
7.98602
8.69497
0.02361
0.21284
0.16894
0.10767
0.11401
8.90383
8.90787
0.04452
0.65796
2517139
3.26819
2.29748
2.43148
1.65986
1.68649
0.77283
0.15185
0.40933
0.37472
0.30998
0.31784
0.29313
0.28412
0.20626
0.47442
25. Stefania Paladini, Joseph Yu-Shek Cheng. 2015. The ASEANChina Free Trade Area A Success or a Failure? A Preliminary
Evaluation Based on Econometric Evidence. Journal of Comparative Asian Development 1-29. [CrossRef]
26. Patrik Karpaty, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall. 2015. Service Offshoring and Corruption: Do Firms Escape Corrupt Countries?. Journal
of Industry, Competition and Trade . [CrossRef]
27. Mila Kashcheeva, Kevin K. Tsui. 2015. Political oil import diversification by financial and commercial traders. Energy Policy 82,
289-297. [CrossRef]
28. Hirokazu Ishise, Miwa Matsuo. 2015. TRADE IN POLARIZED AMERICA: THE BORDER EFFECT BETWEEN RED
STATES AND BLUE STATES. Economic Inquiry 53:10.1111/ecin.2015.53.issue-3, 1647-1670. [CrossRef]
29. Wilfried Koch, James P. LeSage. 2015. Latent Multilateral Trade Resistance Indices: Theory andEvidence. Scottish Journal of Political
Economy 62:10.1111/sjpe.2015.62.issue-3, 264-290. [CrossRef]
30. Christiane Hellmanzik, Martin Schmitz. 2015. Virtual proximity and audiovisual services trade. European Economic Review 77, 82-101.
[CrossRef]
31. Shailja Shah, Yifei Ma, Rebecca Scherzer, Greg Huhn, Audrey L. French, Michael Plankey, Marion G. Peters, Carl Grunfeld, Phyllis
C. Tien. 2015. Association of HIV, hepatitis C virus and liver fibrosis severity with interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels. AIDS
29, 1325-1333. [CrossRef]
32. Alexander Klein, Sheilagh Ogilvie. 2015. Occupational structure in the Czech lands under the second serfdom. The Economic History
Review n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
33. Mario Larch, Pehr-Johan Norbck, Steffen Sirries, Dieter M. Urban. 2015. Heterogeneous Firms, Globalisation and the Distance
Puzzle. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
34. Juyoung Cheong, Do Won Kwak, Kam Ki Tang. 2015. It Is Much Bigger Than What We Thought: New Estimate of Trade Diversion.
The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
35. Pramila Crivelli, Jasmin Groeschl. 2015. The Impact of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on Market Entry and Trade Flows. The
World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
36. Franz Hackl, Michael Hummer, Gerald J. Pruckner. 2015. Old Boys Network in General Practitioners Referral Behavior?. Journal
of Health Economics . [CrossRef]
37. Peter Egger, Joseph Francois, Miriam Manchin, Douglas Nelson. 2015. Non-tariff barriers, integration and the transatlantic economy.
Economic Policy 30, 539-584. [CrossRef]
38. Gabriel Felbermayr, Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch, Erdal Yalcin. 2015. Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: a high
resolution perspective for Europe and the world. Economic Policy 30, 491-537. [CrossRef]
39. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo, Mariangela Morelli. 2015. Modelling tourism flows through gravity models: a quantile regression approach.
Current Issues in Tourism 1-7. [CrossRef]
40. Bassem Kahouli, Samir Maktouf. 2015. The determinants of FDI and the impact of the economic crisis on the implementation of
RTAs: A static and dynamic gravity model. International Business Review 24, 518-529. [CrossRef]
41. M. Mofizul Islam, Ian S. McRae, Laurann Yen, Tanisha Jowsey, Jose M. Valderas. 2015. Time spent on health-related activities by
senior Australians with chronic diseases: what is the role of multimorbidity and comorbidity?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of
Public Health 39:10.1111/azph.2015.39.issue-3, 277-283. [CrossRef]
42. Thibault Fally. 2015. Structural gravity and fixed effects. Journal of International Economics . [CrossRef]
43. Chong Wha Lee, Soonchan Park. 2015. Does Religious Similarity Matter in International Trade in Services?. The World Economy
n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
44. Lauren A. Johnston, Stephen L. Morgan, Yuesheng Wang. 2015. The Gravity of China's African Export Promise. The World Economy
38:10.1111/twec.2015.38.issue-6, 913-934. [CrossRef]
45. Peter H. Egger, Sergey Nigai. 2015. Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained ANOVA-type estimation of gravity models.
Journal of International Economics . [CrossRef]
46. Giuseppe De Arcangelis, Edoardo Di Porto, Gianluca Santoni. 2015. Migration, Labor Tasks and Production Structure. Regional
Science and Urban Economics . [CrossRef]
47. Erhan Artu, John McLaren. 2015. Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility.
Journal of International Economics . [CrossRef]
48. Samuel Standaert, Stijn Ronsse, Benjamin Vandermarliere. 2015. Historical trade integration: globalization and the distance puzzle in
the long twentieth century. Cliometrica . [CrossRef]
49. Rafael Cezar. 2015. The gravity of financial development. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 1-28. [CrossRef]
50. David Buehler, Roger White. 2015. A simple solution to the distance puzzle: balanced data and Poisson estimation. Applied Economics
Letters 22, 587-592. [CrossRef]
51. Martin Acht, Toman Omar Mahmoud, Rainer Thiele. 2015. Corrupt governments do not receive more state-to-state aid: Governance
and the delivery of foreign aid through non-state actors. Journal of Development Economics 114, 20-33. [CrossRef]
52. Christian Hepenstrick, Alexander Tarasov. 2015. Trade Openness and Cross-country Income Differences. Review of International
Economics 23:10.1111/roie.2015.23.issue-2, 271-302. [CrossRef]
53. Hirokazu Ishise, Miwa Matsuo. 2015. USCanada border effect between 1993 and 2007: smaller, less asymmetrical, and declining.
Review of World Economics 151, 291-308. [CrossRef]
54. Steven Poelhekke. 2015. Do global banks facilitate foreign direct investment?. European Economic Review 76, 25-46. [CrossRef]
55. Yi Che, Julan Du, Yi Lu, Zhigang Tao. 2015. Once an enemy, forever an enemy? The long-run impact of the Japanese invasion of
China from 1937 to 1945 on trade and investment. Journal of International Economics 96, 182-198. [CrossRef]
56. Dan Liu, Christopher M. Meissner. 2015. Market potential and the rise of US productivity leadership. Journal of International Economics
96, 72-87. [CrossRef]
57. Andrea Fracasso, Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti. 2015. International trade and R&D spillovers. Journal of International Economics 96,
138-149. [CrossRef]
58. Meixin Guo, Huiran Pan. 2015. Can cross-listing relax financial frictions in trade and equity holdings? A sector-level analysis. Applied
Economics 47, 2012-2029. [CrossRef]
59. Boris Kaiser. 2015. Decomposing differences in arithmetic means: a doubly robust estimation approach. Empirical Economics .
[CrossRef]
60. Marie Poprawe. 2015. On the relationship between corruption and migration: empirical evidence from a gravity model of migration.
Public Choice . [CrossRef]
61. Rishav Bista. 2015. Reconciling the WTO Effects on Trade at the Extensive and Intensive Margins. International Economic Journal
29, 231-257. [CrossRef]
62. I. Simonovska. 2015. Income Differences and Prices of Tradables: Insights from an Online Retailer. The Review of Economic Studies
. [CrossRef]
63. Kazuyuki Iwata, Hajime Katayama, Toshi H. Arimura. 2015. Do households misperceive the benefits of energy-saving actions? Evidence
from a Japanese household survey. Energy for Sustainable Development 25, 27-33. [CrossRef]
64. Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael Llorca-Vivero, Jos Antonio Martnez-Serrano. 2015. The Uneven Impact of Continental Boundaries on
Trade. Open Economies Review 26, 237-257. [CrossRef]
65. Ramesh C. Paudel, Paul J. Burke. 2015. Exchange rate policy and export performance in a landlocked developing country: The case
of Nepal. Journal of Asian Economics . [CrossRef]
66. Mario Levis, Yaz Glnur Muradolu, Kristina Vasileva. 2015. Home bias persistence in foreign direct investments. The European
Journal of Finance 1-21. [CrossRef]
67. Jeffrey D. Shulman, Marcus Cunha, Julian K. Saint Clair. 2015. Consumer Uncertainty and Purchase Decision Reversals: Theory and
Evidence. Marketing Science 150326111834009. [CrossRef]
68. A. Dal Bianco, V. L. Boatto, F. Caracciolo, F. G. Santeramo. 2015. Tariffs and non-tariff frictions in the world wine trade. European
Review of Agricultural Economics . [CrossRef]
69. Anne Boring. 2015. The impact of patent protection on US pharmaceutical exports to developing countries. Applied Economics 47,
1314-1330. [CrossRef]
70. D. Persyn, W. Torfs. 2015. A gravity equation for commuting with an application to estimating regional border effects in Belgium.
Journal of Economic Geography . [CrossRef]
71. Simone Bertoli, Jess Fernndez-Huertas Moraga. 2015. The size of the cliff at the border. Regional Science and Urban Economics
51, 1-6. [CrossRef]
72. D. V. Pahan Prasada. 2015. The Role of Credit, Currency and Debt Crises in Trade Performance: A Product-Disaggregated Panel
Data Analysis. Journal of International Development 27:10.1002/jid.v27.2, 273-284. [CrossRef]
73. Michel Beine, Simone Bertoli, Jess Fernndez-Huertas Moraga. 2015. A Practitioners Guide to Gravity Models of International
Migration. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
74. Malan Le Goff, Sara Salomone. 2015. Remittances and the Changing Composition of Migration. The World Economy n/a-n/a.
[CrossRef]
75. Antoine Gervais. 2015. Trade and growth: A gravity approach. Southern Economic Journal n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
76. Fabien Candau, Elisa Dienesch. 2015. Spatial distribution of skills and regional trade integration. The Annals of Regional Science 54,
451-488. [CrossRef]
77. Aurlien Fichet de Clairfontaine, Manfred M. Fischer, Rafael Lata, Manfred Paier. 2015. Barriers to cross-region research and
development collaborations in Europe: evidence from the fifth European Framework Programme. The Annals of Regional Science 54,
577-590. [CrossRef]
78. Margaret C. Levenstein, Jagadeesh Sivadasan, Valerie Y. Suslow. 2015. The effect of competition on trade: Evidence from the collapse
of international cartels. International Journal of Industrial Organization 39, 56-70. [CrossRef]
79. Antoine Gervais. 2015. Trade and growth: A gravity approach. Southern Economic Journal n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
80. Peter H. Egger, Kevin E. Staub. 2015. GLM estimation of trade gravity models with fixed effects. Empirical Economics . [CrossRef]
81. Juyoung Cheong, Do Won Kwak, Kam Ki Tang. 2015. The distance effects on the intensive and extensive margins of trade over time.
Empirical Economics . [CrossRef]
82. Valeriano Martnez-San Romn, Marta Bengoa, Blanca Snchez-Robles. 2015. Foreign direct investment, trade integration and the
home bias: evidence from the European Union. Empirical Economics . [CrossRef]
83. Adam M. Kleinbaum, Alexander H. Jordan, Pino G. Audia. 2015. An Altercentric Perspective on the Origins of Brokerage in Social
Networks: How Perceived Empathy Moderates the Self-Monitoring Effect. Organization Science 150213083923004. [CrossRef]
84. Qi He, Hong Fang, Miao Wang, Bo Peng. 2015. Trade liberalization and trade performance of environmental goods: evidence from
Asia-Pacific economic cooperation members. Applied Economics 1-19. [CrossRef]
85. Jordi Paniagua, Juan Sapena. 2015. Do credit constraints reduce foreign jobs? A note on foreign direct employment. Applied Economics
Letters 22, 195-198. [CrossRef]
86. Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso, Anca Monika Voicu, Martina Vidovic. 2015. Central East European Countries accession into the
European Union: role of extensive margin for trade in intermediate and final goods. Empirica . [CrossRef]
87. Koen Jochmans. 2015. Multiplicative-error models with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics 184, 315-327. [CrossRef]
88. J. M. C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro. 2015. Trading Partners and Trading Volumes: Implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein
Model Empirically. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 77:10.1111/obes.2015.77.issue-1, 93-105. [CrossRef]
89. Anirudh Shingal. 2015. Econometric Analyses of Home Bias in Government Procurement. Review of International Economics
23:10.1111/roie.2015.23.issue-1, 188-219. [CrossRef]
90. Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael Llorca-Vivero, Jos Antonio Martnez-Serrano, Francisco Requena-Silvente. 2015. Regional export
promotion offices and trade margins. Review of World Economics 151, 145-167. [CrossRef]
91. Clment Bosquet, Herv Boulhol. 2015. What is really puzzling about the distance puzzle. Review of World Economics 151, 1-21.
[CrossRef]
92. Peter Egger, Sergey Nigai. 2015. Energy Demand and Trade in General Equilibrium. Environmental and Resource Economics 60,
191-213. [CrossRef]
93. Felix Groba, Jing Cao. 2015. Chinese Renewable Energy Technology Exports: The Role of Policy, Innovation and Markets.
Environmental and Resource Economics 60, 243-283. [CrossRef]
94. Valeria Costantini, Francesco Crespi. 2015. European enlargement policy, technological capabilities and sectoral export dynamics. The
Journal of Technology Transfer 40, 25-69. [CrossRef]
95. Subal C. Kumbhakar, Christopher F. Parmeter. 2015. Introduction. Empirical Economics 48, 1-8. [CrossRef]
96. Isabel Proena, Stefan Sperlich, Duygu Savac. 2015. Semi-mixed effects gravity models for bilateral trade. Empirical Economics 48,
361-387. [CrossRef]
97. Fsun lengin, Bora ekyay, Peral Tokta Palut, Bur lengin, zgr Kabak, zay zaydn, ule nsel Ekici. 2015. Effects of quotas
on Turkish foreign trade: A gravity model. Transport Policy 38, 1-7. [CrossRef]
98. Rosa Bernardini Papalia, Silvia Bertarelli. 2015. Trade Costs in Bilateral Trade Flows: Heterogeneity and Zeroes in Structural Gravity
Models. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
99. Daniel L. Millimet, Jayjit Roy. 2015. Empirical Tests of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis When Environmental Regulation is
Endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
100. Lorenzo Cassi, Andrea Morrison, Roberta Rabellotti. 2015. Proximity and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from the Global Wine
Industry. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
101. Fabio Montobbio, Annalisa Primi, Valerio Sterzi. 2015. IPRs and International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Six Large Emerging
Countries. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
102. David C. Mowery, Arvids A. Ziedonis. 2015. Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy 44, 50-66.
[CrossRef]
103. Aleksandra Parteka, Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz. 2015. Integrated sectors - diversified earnings: the (missing) impact of offshoring on
wages and wage convergence in the EU27. The Journal of Economic Inequality . [CrossRef]
104. Giusy Cannone, Elisa Ughetto. 2015. Internationalization flows of high-tech start-ups: a gravity model. European Business Review 27,
60-79. [CrossRef]
105. Victoria Licuanan, Toman Omar Mahmoud, Andreas Steinmayr. 2015. The Drivers of Diaspora Donations for Development: Evidence
from the Philippines. World Development 65, 94-109. [CrossRef]
106. Erhan Artuc, Frdric Docquier, aglar zden, Christopher Parsons. 2015. A Global Assessment of Human Capital Mobility: The
Role of Non-OECD Destinations. World Development 65, 6-26. [CrossRef]
107. Justin R. Falk. 2015. COMPARING FEDERAL AND PRIVATE-SECTOR WAGES WITHOUT LOGS. Contemporary Economic
Policy 33:10.1111/coep.2015.33.issue-1, 176-189. [CrossRef]
108. Lorenzo Rotunno, Pierre-Louis Vzina. 2015. QUOTA-HOPPING IN-BOND DIVERSION. Economic Inquiry 53:10.1111/
ecin.2015.53.issue-1, 34-48. [CrossRef]
109. Eberhard Feess, Michael Gerfin, Gerd Muehlheusser. 2015. CONTRACTS AS RENT-SEEKING DEVICES: EVIDENCE FROM
GERMAN SOCCER. Economic Inquiry 53:10.1111/ecin.2015.53.issue-1, 714-730. [CrossRef]
110. Rosalie L. Pacula, David Powell, Paul Heaton, Eric L. Sevigny. 2015. Assessing the Effects of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana
Use: The Devil is in the Details. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34:10.1002/pam.2015.34.issue-1, 7-31. [CrossRef]
111. P. Egger, M. Gassebner. 2015. International terrorism as a trade impediment?. Oxford Economic Papers 67, 42-62. [CrossRef]
112. Alicia Gmez- Tello. 2015. Which commercial partners are important for the most recently admitted EU countries?. Economics of
Transition 23:10.1111/ecot.2015.23.issue-1, 247-292. [CrossRef]
113. Sergey Nigai. 2015. On Measuring the Welfare Gains from Trade Under Consumer Heterogeneity. The Economic Journal n/a-n/a.
[CrossRef]
114. Koen J. M. van der Veer. 2015. The Private Export Credit Insurance Effect on Trade. Journal of Risk and Insurance n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
115. Supon Limwattananon, Sven Neelsen, Owen O'Donnell, Phusit Prakongsai, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Eddy van Doorslaer,
Vuthiphan Vongmongkol. 2015. Universal coverage with supply-side reform: The impact on medical expenditure risk and utilization
in Thailand. Journal of Public Economics 121, 79-94. [CrossRef]
116. Fabrice Defever, Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch. 2015. Spatial exporters. Journal of International Economics 95, 145-156. [CrossRef]
117. Wan-Chien Chiu, Juan Ignacio Pea, Chih-Wei Wang. 2015. Industry characteristics and financial risk contagion. Journal of Banking
& Finance 50, 411-427. [CrossRef]
118. Robert E.B. LucasAfrican Migration 1445-1596. [CrossRef]
119. Badi H. Baltagi, Peter Egger. 2015. Estimation of structural gravity quantile regression models. Empirical Economics . [CrossRef]
120. Lisandra Colley. 2015. Gravity to CARICOM: An Analysis of CARICOMs External Trade Using an Augmented Gravity Model.
Journal of Economics, Business and Management 3. . [CrossRef]
121. Esteban Ferro, Tsunehiro Otsuki, John S. Wilson. 2015. The effect of product standards on agricultural exports. Food Policy 50,
68-79. [CrossRef]
122. Antonina Levatino. 2015. Transnational higher education and skilled migration: Evidence from Australia. International Journal of
Educational Development 40, 106-116. [CrossRef]
123. R. Arezki, K. Deininger, H. Selod. 2015. What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?. The World Bank Economic Review 29, 207-233.
[CrossRef]
124. A.-C. Disdier, L. Fontagne, O. Cadot. 2015. North-South Standards Harmonization and International Trade. The World Bank
Economic Review 29, 327-352. [CrossRef]
125. Ceclia Hornok, Mikls Koren. 2015. Administrative barriers to trade. Journal of International Economics . [CrossRef]
126. Dr Michael Beenstock, Professor Raul R, Vicente Royuela. 2015. The role of urbanisation on international migrations: a case study
of EU and ENP countries. International Journal of Manpower 36:4, 469. [CrossRef]
127. Daniel Haberly, Dariusz Wjcik. 2015. Tax havens and the production of offshore FDI: an empirical analysis. Journal of Economic
Geography 15, 75-101. [CrossRef]
128. Zakaria Sorgho. 2015. RTAs' Proliferation and Trade-diversion Effects: Evidence of the Spaghetti Bowl Phenomenon. The World
Economy n/a. [CrossRef]
129. Raphal Chiappini. 2015. Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan. The
Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 1. [CrossRef]
130. Katerina Gradeva, Inmaculada Martnez-Zarzoso. 2015. Are Trade Preferences more Effective than Aid in Supporting Exports?
Evidence from the Everything But Arms Preference Scheme. The World Economy n/a. [CrossRef]
131. Hamza Cestepe, Ertugrul Yldrm, Bersu Bahtiyar. 2015. The Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Export of MENA Countries to
OECD Trade Partners. Procedia Economics and Finance 23, 1440-1445. [CrossRef]
132. Faqin Lin. 2014. Estimating the effect of the Internet on international trade. The Journal of International Trade & Economic
Development 1-20. [CrossRef]
133. Christopher J Surfield. 2014. Government Mandates and Atypical Work: An Investigation of Right-to-Work States. Eastern Economic
Journal 40, 26-55. [CrossRef]
134. Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol. 2014. Distance Sensitivity of Export: A Firm-Product Level Approach. Journal of Industry, Competition
and Trade 14, 531-554. [CrossRef]
135. Jan Hanousek, Even Koenda. 2014. Factors of trade in Europe. Economic Systems 38, 518-535. [CrossRef]
136. YiFan Sun, Kunfeng Pan. 2014. Prediction of the intercity migration of Chinese graduates. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory
and Experiment 2014, P12022. [CrossRef]
137. Wolszczak-Derlacz Joanna. 2014. THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN COMPETITION ON SECTORAL
GROWTH: A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS. Bulletin of Economic Research 66:10.1111/boer.2014.66.issue-S1, S110-S131.
[CrossRef]
138. Fabrizio Carmignani. 2014. The Curse of Being Landlocked: Institutions Rather than Trade. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
139. Nuria Gallego, Carlos Llano. 2014. Thick and Thin Borders in the European Union: How Deep Internal Integration is Within
Countries, and How Shallow Between Them. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
140. R. Thomson. 2014. The Yield of Plant Variety Protection. American Journal of Agricultural Economics . [CrossRef]
141. Andrea Fracasso. 2014. A gravity model of virtual water trade. Ecological Economics 108, 215-228. [CrossRef]
142. Axel Dreher, Kai Gehring, Stephan Klasen. 2014. Gesture Politics or Real Commitment? Gender Inequality and the Allocation of
Aid. World Development . [CrossRef]
143. F.M. Pericoli, E. Pierucci, L. Ventura. 2014. A note on gravity models and international investment patterns. Applied Financial Economics
24, 1393-1400. [CrossRef]
144. Yves Bourdet, Maria Persson. 2014. Expanding and Diversifying South Mediterranean Exports through Trade Facilitation. Development
Policy Review 32:10.1111/dpr.2014.32.issue-6, 675-699. [CrossRef]
145. Nuria Gallego, Carlos Llano. 2014. The Border Effect and the Nonlinear Relationship between Trade and Distance. Review of
International Economics 22:10.1111/roie.2014.22.issue-5, 1016-1048. [CrossRef]
146. Hakan Yilmazkuday. 2014. Mismeasurement of Distance Effects: The Role of Internal Location of Production. Review of International
Economics 22:10.1111/roie.2014.22.issue-5, 992-1015. [CrossRef]
147. Sanne Hiller. 2014. The Export Promoting Effect of Emigration: Evidence from Denmark. Review of Development Economics
18:10.1111/rode.2014.18.issue-4, 693-708. [CrossRef]
148. Markus Lampe, Florian Ploeckl. 2014. Spanning the Globe: The Rise of Global Communications Systems and the First Globalisation.
Australian Economic History Review 54:10.1111/aehr.2014.54.issue-3, 242-261. [CrossRef]
149. Ina Charlotte Jkel. 2014. Import-push or export-pull? An industry-level analysis of the impact of trade on firm exit. Empirica 41,
747-775. [CrossRef]
150. Dane Davis, Thomas Gift. 2014. The Positive Effects of the Schengen Agreement on European Trade. The World Economy 37:10.1111/
twec.2014.37.issue-11, 1541-1557. [CrossRef]
151. P. Dorian Owen, Niven Winchester. 2014. The impact of US fresh milk production standards on dairy trade. Journal of Policy Modeling
36, 1008-1021. [CrossRef]
152. Emmanuelle Lavalle, Julie Lochard. 2014. The comparative effects of independence on trade. Journal of Comparative Economics .
[CrossRef]
153. Jose Fernandez Donoso. 2014. Do complex inventions need less international patent protection?. Economics Letters 125, 278-281.
[CrossRef]
154. Alja Kuni, Andreja JakliFDI and Institutions: Formal and Informal Institutions 171-205. [CrossRef]
155. Douglas Dow, Lars Hkanson, Bjrn AmbosPerceptions Versus National-Level Differences: A Mediating Model of Psychic Distance
133-170. [CrossRef]
156. Daniel Saslavsky, Ben Shepherd. 2014. Facilitating international production networks: The role of trade logistics. The Journal of
International Trade & Economic Development 23, 979-999. [CrossRef]
157. Mitsuyo Ando, Fukunari Kimura. 2014. Evolution of Machinery Production Networks: Linkage of North America with East Asia.
Asian Economic Papers 13:3, 121-160. [Abstract] [PDF] [PDF Plus]
158. Nadia Campaniello. 2014. The causal effect of trade on migration: Evidence from countries of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership.
Labour Economics 30, 223-233. [CrossRef]
159. Roberto Duran-Fernandez, Georgina Santos. 2014. A regional model of road accessibility in Mexico: Accessibility surfaces and
robustness analysis. Research in Transportation Economics . [CrossRef]
160. Ryan Barnes, Ryan Bosworth. 2014. LNG is Linking Regional Natural Gas Markets: Evidence from the Gravity Model. Energy
Economics . [CrossRef]
161. Kai Xu. 2014. Why Are Agricultural Goods Not Traded More Intensively: High Trade Costs or Low Productivity Variation?. The
World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
162. B. W. Cowan, D. Lee, C. R. Shumway. 2014. The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and U.S. Public Agricultural Research. American
Journal of Agricultural Economics . [CrossRef]
163. Hrushikesh Mallick. 2014. Role of technological infrastructures in exports: evidence from a cross-country analysis. International Review
of Applied Economics 28, 669-694. [CrossRef]
164. Valeria Costantini, Giorgia Sforna. 2014. Do bilateral trade relationships influence the distribution of CDM projects?. Climate Policy
14, 559-580. [CrossRef]
165. Kazunobu Hayakawa. 2014. Bilateral tariff rates in international trade: finished goods versus intermediate goods. International Economics
and Economic Policy 11, 353-370. [CrossRef]
166. Livia Chiu, Barry Eichengreen, Arnaud Mehl. 2014. History, gravity and international finance. Journal of International Money and
Finance 46, 104-129. [CrossRef]
167. Estrella Gomez-Herrera, Bertin Martens, Geomina Turlea. 2014. The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the
EU. Information Economics and Policy 28, 83-96. [CrossRef]
168. Kazunobu Hayakawa, Hyun-Hoon Lee, Donghyun Park. 2014. Do Export Promotion Agencies Increase Exports?. The Developing
Economies 52:10.1111/deve.2014.52.issue-3, 241-261. [CrossRef]
169. Kyle Handley. 2014. Exporting under trade policy uncertainty: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics 94, 50-66.
[CrossRef]
170. Ioannis K. Dassios, Grigoris Kalogeropoulos. 2014. On the stability of equilibrium for a reformulated foreign trade model of three
countries. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 10. . [CrossRef]
171. Shuhei Nishitateno. 2014. Network Effects on Trade in Intermediate Goods: Evidence from the Automobile Industry. Japanese Economic
Review n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
172. tefan Bojnec, Imre Fert, Jzsef Fogarasi. 2014. Quality of institutions and the BRIC countries agro-food exports. China Agricultural
Economic Review 6, 379-394. [CrossRef]
173. Rafael Cezar. 2014. The heterogeneous effect of finance on international trade. Applied Economics 46, 2903-2919. [CrossRef]
174. Bo Xiong, Sixia Chen. 2014. Estimating gravity equation models in the presence of sample selection and heteroscedasticity. Applied
Economics 46, 2993-3003. [CrossRef]
175. Niru Yadav. 2014. Impact of Trade Facilitation on Parts and Components Trade. The International Trade Journal 28, 287-310.
[CrossRef]
176. Riccardo Cappelli, Fabio Montobbio. 2014. European Integration and Knowledge Flows across European Regions. Regional Studies
1-19. [CrossRef]
177. Hannes hler, Peter Nunnenkamp. 2014. Needs-Based Targeting or Favoritism? The Regional Allocation of Multilateral Aid within
Recipient Countries. Kyklos 67:10.1111/kykl.2014.67.issue-3, 420-446. [CrossRef]
178. James E. Anderson, Catherine A. Milot, Yoto V. Yotov. 2014. HOW MUCH DOES GEOGRAPHY DEFLECT SERVICES TRADE?
CANADIAN ANSWERS. International Economic Review 55:10.1111/iere.2014.55.issue-3, 791-818. [CrossRef]
179. Jayjit Roy. 2014. On the robustness of the trade-inducing effects of trade agreements and currency unions. Empirical Economics 47,
253-304. [CrossRef]
180. Bruce A. Blonigen, Jeremy Piger. 2014. Determinants of foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne
d'conomique 47:10.1111/caje.2014.47.issue-3, 775-812. [CrossRef]
181. Fabien Candau, Serge Rey. 2014. The effect of the euro on aeronautic trade: A French regional analysis. Economic Modelling 41,
345-355. [CrossRef]
182. Pascal L. Ghazalian. 2014. On the Magnitude of the Geographic Distance Effect on Primary Agricultural and Processed Food Trade.
Agribusiness n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
183. Tanja Engelbert, Beyhan Bektasoglu, Martina Brockmeier. 2014. Moving toward the EU or the Middle East? An assessment of
alternative Turkish foreign policies utilizing the GTAP framework. Food Policy 47, 46-61. [CrossRef]
184. Martijn J. Burger, Mark J. P. M. Thissen, Frank G. van Oort, Dario Diodato. 2014. The Magnitude and Distance Decay of Trade in
Goods and Services: New Evidence for European Countries. Spatial Economic Analysis 9, 231-259. [CrossRef]
185. Jacques Melitz, Farid Toubal. 2014. Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. Journal of International Economics 93,
351-363. [CrossRef]
186. BO XIONG, JOHN BEGHIN. 2014. DISENTANGLING DEMAND-ENHANCING AND TRADE-COST EFFECTS OF
MAXIMUM RESIDUE REGULATIONS. Economic Inquiry 52:10.1111/ecin.2014.52.issue-3, 1190-1203. [CrossRef]
187. Zakaria Sorgho, Bruno Larue. 2014. Geographical indication regulation and intra-trade in the European Union. Agricultural Economics
n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
188. Seda Meyveci Doganay, Selin Sayek, Fatma Taskin. 2014. Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering?. Energy
Economics 44, 340-349. [CrossRef]
189. MARCO DUEAS, GIORGIO FAGIOLO. 2014. GLOBAL TRADE IMBALANCES: A NETWORK APPROACH. Advances in
Complex Systems 17, 1450014. [CrossRef]
190. David S. Jacks. 2014. Defying gravity: The Imperial Economic Conference and the reorientation of Canadian trade. Explorations in
Economic History 53, 19-39. [CrossRef]
191. Ulrich Kaiser, Susan J. Mendez, Thomas Rnde, Hannes Ullrich. 2014. Regulation of pharmaceutical prices: Evidence from a reference
price reform in Denmark. Journal of Health Economics 36, 174-187. [CrossRef]
192. Wulung Hanandita, Gindo Tampubolon. 2014. Does poverty reduce mental health? An instrumental variable analysis. Social Science
& Medicine 113, 59-67. [CrossRef]
193. Donald Lien, Sucharita Ghosh, Steven Yamarik. 2014. Does the Confucius institute impact international travel to China? A panel data
analysis. Applied Economics 46, 1985-1995. [CrossRef]
194. Anokye M. Adam, Imran Sharif Chaudhry. 2014. The currency union effect on intra-regional trade in Economic Community of West
African States (ECOWAS). Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 13, 102-122. [CrossRef]
195. Mariarosaria Agostino, Francesco Trivieri. 2014. Geographical indication and wine exports. An empirical investigation considering the
major European producers. Food Policy 46, 22-36. [CrossRef]
196. Shanping Yang, Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso. 2014. A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of
ASEANChina Free Trade Area. China Economic Review 29, 138-151. [CrossRef]
197. Kazunobu Hayakawa, Hyun-Hoon Lee, Donghyun Park. 2014. Are Investment Promotion Agencies Effective in Promoting Outward
Foreign Direct Investment? The Cases of Japan and Korea. Asian Economic Journal 28:10.1111/asej.2014.28.issue-2, 111-138.
[CrossRef]
198. G. Philippidis, H. Resano, A.I. Sanjun. 2014. Shifting Armington trade preferences: A re-examination of the MercosurEU
negotiations. Economic Modelling 40, 21-32. [CrossRef]
199. Robert Sparrow, Ellen Van de Poel, Gracia Hadiwidjaja, Athia Yumna, Nila Warda, Asep Suryahadi. 2014. COPING WITH THE
ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF ILL HEALTH IN INDONESIA. Health Economics 23:10.1002/hec.v23.6, 719-728. [CrossRef]
200. Ajay Bhaskarabhatla, Deepak Hegde. 2014. An Organizational Perspective on Patenting and Open Innovation. Organization Science
140527113659001. [CrossRef]
201. Tamara de la Mata. 2014. Does trade creation by social and business networks hold in services?. Applied Economics 46, 1509-1525.
[CrossRef]
202. Edward Anderson. 2014. Time differences, communication and trade: longitude matters II. Review of World Economics 150, 337-369.
[CrossRef]
203. Bengt Sderlund, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall. 2014. Dynamic effects of institutions on firm-level exports. Review of World Economics
150, 277-308. [CrossRef]
204. Peter Egger, Christian Keuschnigg, Valeria Merlo, Georg Wamser. 2014. Corporate Taxes and Internal Borrowing within Multinational
Firms . American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6, 54-93. [CrossRef]
205. Harry Huizinga, Johannes Voget, Wolf Wagner. 2014. International Taxation and Cross-Border Banking . American Economic Journal:
Economic Policy 6, 94-125. [CrossRef]
206. Zsombor Pall, Oleksandr Perekhozhuk, Thomas Glauben, Sren Prehn, Ramona Teuber. 2014. Residual demand measures of market
power of Russian wheat exporters. Agricultural Economics 45:10.1111/agec.2014.45.issue-3, 381-391. [CrossRef]
207. Shekhar Aiyar, Charles W. Calomiris, John Hooley, Yevgeniya Korniyenko, Tomasz Wieladek. 2014. The international transmission
of bank capital requirements: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Financial Economics . [CrossRef]
208. Kazunobu Hayakawa, Fukunari Kimura, Kaoru Nabeshima. 2014. NONCONVENTIONAL PROVISIONS IN REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTS: DO THEY ENHANCE INTERNATIONAL TRADE?. Journal of Applied Economics 17, 113-137. [CrossRef]
209. Jordi Paniagua, Juan Sapena. 2014. Is FDI doing good? A golden rule for FDI ethics. Journal of Business Research 67, 807-812.
[CrossRef]
210. Sylvanus Kwaku Afesorgbor, Peter A. G. van Bergeijk. 2014. Measuring Multi-Membership in Economic Integration and Its Trade
Impact: A Comparative Study of ECOWAS and SADC. South African Journal of Economics n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
211. F. Docquier, Ch. Vasilakis, D. Tamfutu Munsi. 2014. International migration and the propagation of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.
Journal of Health Economics 35, 20-33. [CrossRef]
212. Massimiliano Bratti, Luca De Benedictis, Gianluca Santoni. 2014. On the pro-trade effects of immigrants. Review of World Economics
. [CrossRef]
213. N. Crafts, A. Klein. 2014. Geography and intra-national home bias: U.S. domestic trade in 1949 and 2007. Journal of Economic
Geography . [CrossRef]
214. Mariarosaria Agostino, Francesco Trivieri. 2014. World Bank trade loans and export performance of recipient countries. Journal of
Economic Policy Reform 17, 99-128. [CrossRef]
215. Keisaku Higashida, Shunsuke Managi. 2014. Determinants of trade in recyclable wastes: evidence from commodity-based trade of
waste and scrap. Environment and Development Economics 19, 250-270. [CrossRef]
216. Douglas H. Brooks, Benno Ferrarini. 2014. Vertical gravity. Journal of Asian Economics 31-32, 1-9. [CrossRef]
217. Emmanuel Frot, Anders Olofsgrd, Maria Perrotta Berlin. 2014. Aid Effectiveness in Times of Political Change: Lessons from the
Post-Communist Transition. World Development 56, 127-138. [CrossRef]
218. Thierry Baudass, Rmi Bazillier. 2014. Gender inequality and emigration: Push factor or selection process?. International Economics
. [CrossRef]
219. Christian Henn, Brad McDonald. 2014. Crisis Protectionism: The Observed Trade Impact. IMF Economic Review 62, 77-118.
[CrossRef]
220. Gindo Tampubolon, Wulung Hanandita. 2014. Poverty and mental health in Indonesia. Social Science & Medicine 106, 20-27.
[CrossRef]
221. Kees van Veen, Padma Rao Sahib, Evelien Aangeenbrug. 2014. Where do international board members come from? Country-level
antecedents of international board member selection in European boards. International Business Review 23, 407-417. [CrossRef]
222. Park Young Seaon. 2014. Trade in Cultural Goods: A Case of the Korean Wave in Asia. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration
18, 83-107. [CrossRef]
223. Peter Egger, Horst Raff. 2014. Tax rate and tax base competition for foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance
. [CrossRef]
224. Francesc Ortega, Giovanni Peri. 2014. Openness and income: The roles of trade and migration. Journal of International Economics
92, 231-251. [CrossRef]
225. Niels Johannesen. 2014. Tax evasion and Swiss bank deposits. Journal of Public Economics 111, 46-62. [CrossRef]
226. Esmeralda A. Ramalho, Joaquim J.S. Ramalho. 2014. Convenient links for the estimation of hedonic price indexes: the case of unique,
infrequently traded assets. Statistica Neerlandica n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
227. Mariya Aleksynska, Giovanni Peri. 2014. Isolating the Network Effect of Immigrants on Trade. The World Economy 37:10.1111/
twec.2014.37.issue-3, 434-455. [CrossRef]
228. Michel Beine, Romain Nol, Lionel Ragot. 2014. Determinants of the international mobility ofstudents. Economics of Education Review
. [CrossRef]
229. Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael Llorca-Vivero, Jos Antonio Martnez-Serrano. 2014. Do nonreciprocal preferential trade agreements
increase beneficiaries' exports?. Journal of Development Economics 107, 291-304. [CrossRef]
230. Timothy P. Hubbard. 2014. Trade and transboundary pollution: quantifying the effects of trade liberalization on CO 2 emissions.
Applied Economics 46, 483-502. [CrossRef]
231. Felix Groba. 2014. Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the porter hypothesis?. Applied
Economics 46, 503-526. [CrossRef]
232. Marc P. Umber, Michael H. Grote, Rainer Frey. 2014. Same as it ever was? Europe's national borders and the market for corporate
control. Journal of International Money and Finance 40, 109-127. [CrossRef]
233. Erik van der Marel, Iana Dreyer. 2014. Beyond Dutch disease. Economics of Transition n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
234. Harald Badinger, Kemal Trkcan. 2014. Currency Unions, Export Margins, and Product Differentiation: An Empirical Assessment
for European Monetary Union. Review of International Economics 22:10.1111/roie.2014.22.issue-1, 13-30. [CrossRef]
235. Shujiro Urata, Misa Okabe. 2014. Trade Creation and Diversion Effects of Regional Trade Agreements: A Product-level Analysis.
The World Economy 37:10.1111/twec.2014.37.issue-2, 267-289. [CrossRef]
236. Neil Foster. 2014. Intellectual property rights and the margins of international trade. The Journal of International Trade & Economic
Development 23, 1-30. [CrossRef]
237. William F. Fox, LeAnn Luna, Georg Schaur. 2014. Destination taxation and evasion: Evidence from U.S. inter-state commodity flows.
Journal of Accounting and Economics 57, 43-57. [CrossRef]
238. Oscar Melo, Alejandra Engler, Laura Nahuehual, Gabriela Cofre, Jos Barrena. 2014. Do Sanitary, Phytosanitary, and Quality-related
Standards Affect International Trade? Evidence from Chilean Fruit Exports. World Development 54, 350-359. [CrossRef]
239. Joseph Francois, Miriam Manchin. 2014. Protection and Performance. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
240. Bianka Dettmer. 2014. Trade Effects of the European Union's Service Directive: Contrasting ex ante Estimates with Empirical
Evidence. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
241. GABRIEL FELBERMAYR, JASMIN GRSCHL. 2014. WITHIN U.S. TRADE AND THE LONG SHADOW OF THE
AMERICAN SECESSION. Economic Inquiry 52:10.1111/ecin.2014.52.issue-1, 382-404. [CrossRef]
242. Adel Bino, Diana Abu Ghunmi, Ibrahim Qteishat. 2014. Trade, Export Capacity, and World Trade Organization Membership:
Evidence from Jordan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 50, 51-67. [CrossRef]
243. DJETO ASSANE, ERIC P. CHIANG. 2014. TRADE, STRUCTURAL REFORM, AND INSTITUTIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN
AFRICA. Contemporary Economic Policy 32:10.1111/coep.2014.32.issue-1, 20-29. [CrossRef]
244. Olga IvanovaModelling Inter-Regional Freight Demand with InputOutput, Gravity and SCGE Methodologies 13-42. [CrossRef]
245. Eliza Olivia Lungu, Ana Maria Zamfir, Cristina Mocanu, Sperana Prciog. 2014. Gravitational Model of the Occupational Mobility
of the Higher Education Graduates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109, 417-421. [CrossRef]
246. Giulia Bettin, Andrea Presbitero, Nicola Spatafora. 2014. Remittances and Vulnerability in Developing Countries. IMF Working Papers
14, 1. [CrossRef]
247. Keith Head, Thierry MayerGravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook 131-195. [CrossRef]
248. Muhammad Ullah, Kazuo Inaba. 2014. Liberalization and FDI Performance: Evidence from ASEAN and SAFTA Member Countries.
Journal of Economic Structures 3, 6. [CrossRef]
249. Bae Chankwon, Jang Yong Joon. 2013. The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Korea.
Journal of East Asian Economic Integration 17, 417-445. [CrossRef]
250. Juan Blyde. 2013. Paving the Road to Export: Assessing the Trade Impact of Road Quality. International Economic Journal 27, 663-681.
[CrossRef]
251. Nicola Francesco Dotti, Ugo Fratesi, Camilla Lenzi, Marco Percoco. 2013. Local Labour Markets and the Interregional Mobility of
Italian University Students. Spatial Economic Analysis 8, 443-468. [CrossRef]
252. Hyun-Hoon Lee, Insill Yi, Donghyun Park. 2013. Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on the Degree of Financial Integration among
East Asian Countries. Global Economic Review 42, 425-459. [CrossRef]
253. M. T. Clement, E. Podowski. 2013. Intensifying the Countryside: A Sociological Study of Cropland Lost to the Built Environment
in the United States, 2001-2006. Social Forces 92, 815-838. [CrossRef]
254. Paulo Jlio, Ricardo PinheiroAlves, Jos Tavares. 2013. Foreign direct investment and institutional reform: evidence and an application
to Portugal. Portuguese Economic Journal 12, 215-250. [CrossRef]
255. Mian Dai, Yoto V. Yotov, Thomas Zylkin. 2013. On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economics Letters . [CrossRef]
256. Omar S. Dahi, Firat Demir. 2013. Preferential trade agreements and manufactured goods exports: does it matter whom you PTA
with?. Applied Economics 45, 4754-4772. [CrossRef]
257. Koen Berden, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Eva van Etten. 2013. Governance and Globalisation. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
258. Tatiana Plotnikova, Bastian Rake. 2013. Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: exploration of country-level determinants.
Scientometrics . [CrossRef]
259. Sergey Mityakov, Heiwai Tang, Kevin K. Tsui. 2013. International Politics and Import Diversification. Journal of Law and Economics
56, 1091-1121. [CrossRef]
260. Kyriakos Drivas, Claire Economidou. 2013. Government sponsorship and nature of patenting activity of US universities and
corporations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22, 775-806. [CrossRef]
261. Jean-Christophe Bureau, Sbastien Jean. 2013. Trade liberalization in the bio-economy: coping with a new landscape. Agricultural
Economics 44:10.1111/agec.2013.44.issue-s1, 173-182. [CrossRef]
262. F. Karam, C. Zaki. 2013. On the determinants of trade in services: evidence from the MENA region. Applied Economics 45, 4662-4676.
[CrossRef]
263. Alessandro Barattieri. 2013. Comparative advantage, service trade, and global imbalances. Journal of International Economics . [CrossRef]
264. Kit Chi Chung, Pauline Fleming, Euan Fleming. 2013. The impact of information and communication technology on international
trade in fruit and vegetables in APEC. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 27:10.1111/apel.2013.27.issue-2, 117-130. [CrossRef]
265. Aleksandra Parteka. 2013. The Role of Trade in Intra-Industry Productivity Growth-the Case of Old and New European Union
Countries. Review of Development Economics 17:10.1111/rode.2013.17.issue-4, 712-731. [CrossRef]
266. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Peter Egger. 2013. Shouldn't Physical Capital Also Matter for Multinational Enterprise Activity?. Review of
International Economics 21:10.1111/roie.2013.21.issue-5, 945-965. [CrossRef]
267. Erik van der Marel, Ben Shepherd. 2013. Services Trade, Regulation and Regional Integration: Evidence from Sectoral Data. The
World Economy 36, 1393-1405. [CrossRef]
268. Fabienne Boudier, Julie Lochard. 2013. How do Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions Answer to Deregulation in Services?. The
World Economy 36:10.1111/twec.2013.36.issue-11, 1424-1441. [CrossRef]
269. Yong Zhao, Kam Ki Tang, Li-li Wang. 2013. Do renewable electricity policies promote renewable electricity generation? Evidence
from panel data. Energy Policy 62, 887-897. [CrossRef]
270. Mahvash Saeed Qureshi. 2013. Trade and thy neighbor's war. Journal of Development Economics 105, 178-195. [CrossRef]
271. Andreas Dr, Leonardo Baccini, Manfred Elsig. 2013. The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The
Review of International Organizations . [CrossRef]
272. S. Michalopoulos, E. Papaioannou. 2013. National Institutions and Subnational Development in Africa. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics . [CrossRef]
273. Nicole B. Simpson, Chad Sparber. 2013. The Short- and Long-Run Determinants of Less-Educated Immigrant Flows into U.S.
States. Southern Economic Journal 80, 414-438. [CrossRef]
274. Ben Shepherd, Norbert L.W. Wilson. 2013. Product standards and developing country agricultural exports: The case of the European
Union. Food Policy 42, 1-10. [CrossRef]
275. Ina Simonovska, Michael E. Waugh. 2013. The elasticity of trade: Estimates and evidence. Journal of International Economics .
[CrossRef]
276. Ernest Migulez, Rosina Moreno. 2013. WHAT ATTRACTS KNOWLEDGE WORKERS? THE ROLE OF SPACE AND
SOCIAL NETWORKS. Journal of Regional Science n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
277. Nhuong Tran, Anh Nguyen, Norbert L.W. Wilson. 2013. The Differential Effects of Food Safety Regulations on Animal Products
Trade: The Case of Crustacean Product Trade. Agribusiness n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
278. O. Dube, J. F. Vargas. 2013. Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia. The Review of Economic Studies
80, 1384-1421. [CrossRef]
279. Peter Egger, Tobias Seidel. 2013. Corporate taxes and intra-firm trade. European Economic Review 63, 225-242. [CrossRef]
280. Adam M. Kleinbaum, Toby E. Stuart, Michael L. Tushman. 2013. Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a
Formal Organization. Organization Science 24, 1316-1336. [CrossRef]
281. Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael-Llorca Vivero, Jordi Paniagua. 2013. The effect of the great recession on foreign direct investment: global
empirical evidence with a gravity approach. Applied Economics Letters 20, 1244-1248. [CrossRef]
282. Emmanuelle Quillrou, Nolwenn Roudaut, Olivier Guyader. 2013. Managing Fleet Capacity Effectively Under Second-Hand Market
Redistribution. AMBIO 42, 611-627. [CrossRef]
283. P. Chintrakarn. 2013. Subnational trade flows and state-level energy intensity: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics Letters 20,
1344-1351. [CrossRef]
284. Cline Carrre, Jaime de Melo, John Wilson. 2013. THE DISTANCE PUZZLE AND LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES: AN
UPDATE. Journal of Economic Surveys 27:10.1111/joes.2013.27.issue-4, 717-742. [CrossRef]
285. Jan Pettersson, Lars Johansson. 2013. Aid, Aid for Trade, and bilateral trade: An empirical study. The Journal of International Trade
& Economic Development 22, 866-894. [CrossRef]
286. Anthony Briant, Pierre-Philippe Combes, Miren Lafourcade. 2013. Product Complexity, Quality of Institutions and the Protrade
Effect of Immigrants. The World Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
287. Henry Sauermann, Michael Roach. 2013. Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs preferences for publishing in industrial
employment. Research Policy . [CrossRef]
288. Xiaohua Bao, Wei-Chih Chen. 2013. The Impacts of Technical Barriers to Trade on Different Components of International Trade.
Review of Development Economics 17:10.1111/rode.2013.17.issue-3, 447-460. [CrossRef]
289. Andrea Caragliu, Chiara Del Bo, Henri L. F. Groot, Gert-Jan M. Linders. 2013. Cultural determinants of migration. The Annals of
Regional Science 51, 7-32. [CrossRef]
290. Pascal L. Ghazalian. 2013. MERCOSUR enlargement: predicting the effects on trade in primary agricultural commodities. Economic
Change and Restructuring 46, 277-297. [CrossRef]
291. Joseph A. Clougherty, Micha Grajek. 2013. International standards and international trade: Empirical evidence from ISO 9000
diffusion. International Journal of Industrial Organization . [CrossRef]
292. Gabriel J. Felbermayr, Erdal Yalcin. 2013. Export Credit Guarantees and Export Performance: An Empirical Analysis for Germany.
The World Economy 36, 967-999. [CrossRef]
293. Alessandro Antimiani, Valeria Costantini. 2013. Trade performances and technology in the enlarged European Union. Journal of
Economic Studies 40, 355-389. [CrossRef]
294. Chong Wha Lee. 2013. Does religion affect international trade in services more than trade in goods?. Applied Economics Letters 20,
998-1002. [CrossRef]
295. Atef Al-Rashidi, Bidisha Lahiri. 2013. The effect of exchange rate volatility on trade: correcting for selection bias and asymmetric
trade flows. Applied Economics Letters 20, 1121-1126. [CrossRef]
296. AMLIE GUILLIN. 2013. Assessment of tariff equivalents for services considering the zero flows. World Trade Review 12, 549-575.
[CrossRef]
297. E. Peterson, J. Grant, D. Roberts, V. Karov. 2013. Evaluating the Trade Restrictiveness of Phytosanitary Measures on U.S. Fresh Fruit
and Vegetable Imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95, 842-858. [CrossRef]
298. LEO H. KAHANE. 2013. UNDERSTANDING THE INTERSTATE EXPORT OF CRIME GUNS: A GRAVITY MODEL
APPROACH. Contemporary Economic Policy 31:10.1111/coep.2013.31.issue-3, 618-634. [CrossRef]
299. Sangkyom Kim, Innwon Park, Soonchan Park. 2013. Trade-creating regime-wide rules of origin: a quantitative analysis. Applied
Economics Letters 20, 1056-1061. [CrossRef]
300. Roberto Patuelli, Maurizio Mussoni, Guido Candela. 2013. The effects of World Heritage Sites on domestic tourism: a spatial
interaction model for Italy. Journal of Geographical Systems 15, 369-402. [CrossRef]
301. Holger Breinlich, Alejandro Cuat. 2013. Geography, non-homotheticity, and industrialization: A quantitative analysis. Journal of
Development Economics 103, 133-153. [CrossRef]
302. Clment Bosquet, Herv Boulhol. 2013. Applying the GLM Variance Assumption to Overcome the Scale-Dependence of the Negative
Binomial QGPML Estimator. Econometric Reviews 130614131347004. [CrossRef]
303. Ernest Migulez, Rosina Moreno. 2013. Do Labour Mobility and Technological Collaborations Foster Geographical Knowledge
Diffusion? The Case of European Regions. Growth and Change 44:10.1111/grow.2013.44.issue-2, 321-354. [CrossRef]
304. Estrella Gmez-Herrera. 2013. Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empirical Economics 44,
1087-1111. [CrossRef]
305. Craig Macphee, Peter Cook, Wanasin Sattayanuwat. 2013. Transportation and The International Trade of Eastern and Southern
Africa. South African Journal of Economics 81:10.1111/saje.2013.81.issue-2, 225-239. [CrossRef]
306. Rebecca Tomasik. 2013. Time zone-related continuity and synchronization effects on bilateral trade flows. Review of World Economics
149, 321-342. [CrossRef]
307. Axel Berger, Matthias Busse, Peter Nunnenkamp, Martin Roy. 2013. Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI?
Accounting for key provisions inside the black box. International Economics and Economic Policy 10, 247-275. [CrossRef]
308. Hyun-Hoon Lee, Donghyun Park, Jing Wang. 2013. Different types of firms, different types of products, and their dynamics: An
anatomy of China's imports. China Economic Review 25, 62-77. [CrossRef]
309. Jan Pokrivcak, Siemen van Berkum, Lenka Drgova, Marian Mraz, Pavel Ciaian. 2013. The role of non-tariff measures in EU dairy
trade with Russia. Post-Communist Economies 25, 175-189. [CrossRef]
310. A. Cheptea. 2013. Border Effects and European Integration. CESifo Economic Studies 59, 277-305. [CrossRef]
311. C. Umana Dajud. 2013. Political Proximity and International Trade. Economics & Politics n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
312. Joseph Francois, Miriam Manchin. 2013. Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade. World Development 46, 165-175. [CrossRef]
313. Miguel Flores, Mary Zey, Nazrul Hoque. 2013. Economic Liberalization and Contemporary Determinants of Mexico's Internal
Migration: An Application of Spatial Gravity Models. Spatial Economic Analysis 8, 195-214. [CrossRef]
314. Gianluca Orefice, Nadia Rocha. 2013. Deep Integration and Production Networks: An Empirical Analysis. The World Economy n/
a-n/a. [CrossRef]
315. Kevin E. Staub, Rainer Winkelmann. 2013. CONSISTENT ESTIMATION OF ZERO-INFLATED COUNT MODELS. Health
Economics 22:10.1002/hec.v22.6, 673-686. [CrossRef]
316. Fernando Ferreira, Joel Waldfogel. 2013. Pop Internationalism: Has Half a Century of World Music Trade Displaced Local Culture?.
The Economic Journal 123, 634-664. [CrossRef]
317. HYUN-HOON LEE, DONGHYUN PARK. 2013. THE FINANCIAL ROLE OF EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES IN GLOBAL
IMBALANCES: AN ECONOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTS AFTER THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS.
Global Journal of Economics 02, 1350006. [CrossRef]
318. Simone Bertoli, Jess Fernndez-Huertas Moraga. 2013. Multilateral resistance to migration. Journal of Development Economics 102,
79-100. [CrossRef]
319. Carol McAusland, Daniel L. Millimet. 2013. Do national borders matter? Intranational trade, international trade, and the environment.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65, 411-437. [CrossRef]
320. David Law, Murat Gen, John Bryant. 2013. Trade, Diaspora and Migration to New Zealand. The World Economy 36, 582-606.
[CrossRef]
321. Joaquim J. S. Ramalho, J. Vidigal Silva. 2013. Functional form issues in the regression analysis of financial leverage ratios. Empirical
Economics 44, 799-831. [CrossRef]
322. Mustafa Caglayan, Omar S. Dahi, Firat Demir. 2013. Trade Flows, Exchange Rate Uncertainty, and Financial Depth: Evidence from
28 Emerging Countries. Southern Economic Journal 79, 905-927. [CrossRef]
323. Andreas Fuchs, Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati. 2013. The Needy Donor: An Empirical Analysis of Indias Aid Motives. World
Development 44, 110-128. [CrossRef]
324. MICHAEL D. WARD, JOHN S. AHLQUIST, ARTURAS ROZENAS. 2013. Gravity's Rainbow: A dynamic latent space model
for the world trade network. Network Science 1, 95-118. [CrossRef]
325. Giorgio Fagiolo, Tiziano Squartini, Diego Garlaschelli. 2013. Null models of economic networks: the case of the world trade web.
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 8, 75-107. [CrossRef]
326. Fabio Montobbio, Valerio Sterzi. 2013. The Globalization of Technology in Emerging Markets: A Gravity Model on the Determinants
of International Patent Collaborations. World Development 44, 281-299. [CrossRef]
327. Valeria Costantini, Francesco Crespi. 2013. Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of
innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23, 401-429. [CrossRef]
328. Jean-Franois Arvis, Ben Shepherd. 2013. The Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator: a solution to the adding up problem
in gravity models. Applied Economics Letters 20, 515-519. [CrossRef]
329. Daniel Berger, William Easterly, Nathan Nunn, Shanker Satyanath. 2013. Commercial Imperialism? Political Influence and Trade
During the Cold War. American Economic Review 103, 863-896. [CrossRef]
330. Marco Dueas, Giorgio Fagiolo. 2013. Modeling the International-Trade Network: a gravity approach. Journal of Economic Interaction
and Coordination 8, 155-178. [CrossRef]
331. Armando J. Garcia Pires. 2013. Beyond Trade Costs: Firms Endogenous Access to International Markets. Journal of Industry,
Competition and Trade . [CrossRef]
332. E. Tani Fukui, Alexander B. Hammer, Lin Z. Jones. 2013. Are U.S. exports influenced by stronger IPR protection measures in
recipient markets?. Business Horizons 56, 179-188. [CrossRef]
333. Aleksandra Parteka, Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz. 2013. The Impact of Trade Integration with the European Union on Productivity in
a Posttransition Economy: The Case of Polish Manufacturing Sectors. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 49, 84-104. [CrossRef]
334. Kazunobu Hayakawa. 2013. How serious is the omission of bilateral tariff rates in gravity?. Journal of the Japanese and International
Economies 27, 81-94. [CrossRef]
335. Shuhei Nishitateno. 2013. Global production sharing and the FDItrade nexus: New evidence from the Japanese automobile industry.
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 27, 64-80. [CrossRef]
336. George Philippidis, Helena Resano-Ezcaray, Ana I. Sanjun-Lpez. 2013. Capturing zero-trade values in gravity equations of trade:
an analysis of protectionism in agro-food sectors. Agricultural Economics 44:10.1111/agec.2013.44.issue-2, 141-159. [CrossRef]
337. Marco Fugazza, Alessandro Nicita. 2013. The direct and relative effects of preferential market access. Journal of International Economics
89, 357-368. [CrossRef]
338. Z. U. Haq, K. Meilke, J. Cranfield. 2013. Selection bias in a gravity model of agrifood trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics
40, 331-360. [CrossRef]
339. D. V. Pahan Prasada. 2013. Domestic versus Multilateral Institutions in Bilateral Trade: A Comparative Gravity Analysis. International
Economic Journal 27, 127-142. [CrossRef]
340. Karel Janda, Eva Michalikova, Jiri Skuhrovec. 2013. Credit Support for Export: Robust Evidence from the Czech Republic. The World
Economy n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
341. Faqin Lin. 2013. Are distance effects really a puzzle?. Economic Modelling 31, 684-689. [CrossRef]
342. Russell Thomson. 2013. National scientific capacity and R&D offshoring. Research Policy 42, 517-528. [CrossRef]
343. Sushil Mohan, Sangeeta Khorana, Homagni Choudhury. 2013. Why Developing Countries Have Failed to Increase Their Exports of
Agricultural Processed Products. Economic Affairs 33:10.1111/ecaf.2013.33.issue-1, 48-64. [CrossRef]
344. Gabriel Felbermayr, Jasmin Grschl. 2013. Natural disasters and the effect of trade on income: A new panel IV approach. European
Economic Review 58, 18-30. [CrossRef]
345. Alejandro Cuat, Christian Fons-Rosen. 2013. RELATIVE FACTOR ENDOWMENTS AND INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO
CHOICE. Journal of the European Economic Association 11, 166-200. [CrossRef]
346. Volker Nitsch, Nikolaus Wolf. 2013. Tear down this wall: on the persistence of borders in trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue
canadienne d'conomique 46, 154-179. [CrossRef]
347. Emmanuelle Lavalle, Vincent Vicard. 2013. National borders matterwhere one draws the lines too. Canadian Journal of
Economics/Revue canadienne d'conomique 46, 135-153. [CrossRef]
348. Yan Zhou, Jiadong Tong, Puyang Sun. 2013. What's special about the extensive and intensive margins in Chinese manufacturing
exports?. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 6, 19-34. [CrossRef]
349. Juan Alcacer, Paul Ingram. 2013. Spanning the Institutional Abyss: The Intergovernmental Network and the Governance of Foreign
Direct Investment 1. American Journal of Sociology 118, 1055-1098. [CrossRef]
350. Inmaculada Martnez-Zarzoso. 2013. The log of gravity revisited. Applied Economics 45, 311-327. [CrossRef]
351. J.M.C. Santos Silva, S. TenreyroCurrency Unions 451-461. [CrossRef]
352. Maximiliano Sosa Andrs, Peter Nunnenkamp, Matthias Busse. 2013. What Drives FDI from Non-traditional Sources? A Comparative
Analysis of the Determinants of Bilateral FDI Flows. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 7, 1. [CrossRef]
353. Jason H. Grant. 2013. Is the growth of regionalism as significant as the headlines suggest? Lessons from agricultural trade. Agricultural
Economics 44:10.1111/agec.2013.44.issue-1, 93-109. [CrossRef]
354. L. Cissokho, J. Haughton, K. Makpayo, A. Seck. 2013. Why Is Agricultural Trade within ECOWAS So High?. Journal of African
Economies 22, 22-51. [CrossRef]
355. DENNIS NOVY. 2013. GRAVITY REDUX: MEASURING INTERNATIONAL TRADE COSTS WITH PANEL DATA.
Economic Inquiry 51:10.1111/ecin.2013.51.issue-1, 101-121. [CrossRef]
356. Iza Lejrraga, Ben Shepherd, Frank van Tongeren4 Transparency in Nontariff Measures: Effects on Agricultural Trade 99-125.
[CrossRef]
357. Nhuong Tran, Norbert Wilson, Diane Hite5 Choosing the Best Model in the Presence of Zero Trade: A Fish Product Analysis
127-148. [CrossRef]
358. Bo Xiong, John C. Beghin10 Stringent Maximum Residue Limits, Protectionism, and Competitiveness: The Cases of the US and
Canada 245-259. [CrossRef]
359. Youssouf Kiendrebeogo. 2013. How Do Banking Crises Affect Bilateral Exports?. IMF Working Papers 13, i. [CrossRef]
360. Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall, Andreas Poldahl. 2012. Determinants of Firm R&D: The Role of Relationship-Specific Interactions for
R&D Spillovers. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 12, 395-411. [CrossRef]
361. Arvin Pirness, M. Rose Olfert, Mark D. Partridge, William Hartley Furtan. 2012. Assessing the Impact of State Trading Enterprises.
International Economic Journal 26, 587-608. [CrossRef]
362. Fabien Candau, Jean-Franois Hoarau, Serge Rey. 2012. Limpact de la distance et de lintgration sur le commerce dune rgion
ultrapriphrique dEurope: lle de La Runion. European Journal of Development Research 24, 808-831. [CrossRef]
363. Lars Hkanson, Douglas Dow. 2012. Markets and Networks in International Trade: On the Role of Distances in Globalization.
Management International Review 52, 761-789. [CrossRef]
364. Valentina Raimondi, Margherita Scoppola, Alessandro Olper. 2012. Preference erosion and the developing countries exports to the
EU: a dynamic panel gravity approach. Review of World Economics 148, 707-732. [CrossRef]
365. Ludo Peeters. 2012. GRAVITY AND SPATIAL STRUCTURE: THE CASE OF INTERSTATE MIGRATION IN MEXICO*.
Journal of Regional Science 52:10.1111/jors.2012.52.issue-5, 819-856. [CrossRef]
366. Sophie Drogu, Federica DeMaria. 2012. Pesticide residues and trade, the apple of discord?. Food Policy 37, 641-649. [CrossRef]
367. Jos de Sousa. 2012. The currency union effect on trade is decreasing over time. Economics Letters 117, 917-920. [CrossRef]
368. Yoto V. Yotov. 2012. A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade. Economics Letters 117, 794-798. [CrossRef]
369. Martin Ruf, Alfons J. Weichenrieder. 2012. The taxation of passive foreign investment: lessons from German experience. Canadian
Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'conomique 45, 1504-1528. [CrossRef]
370. RABIN HATTARI, RAMKISHEN S. RAJAN. 2012. SOURCES OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT FLOWS TO
DEVELOPING ASIA: THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME ZONE. China Economic Policy Review 01, 1250013. [CrossRef]
371. Jos de Sousa, Thierry Mayer, Soledad Zignago. 2012. Market access in global and regional trade. Regional Science and Urban Economics
42, 1037-1052. [CrossRef]
372. Neil Foster. 2012. Preferential Trade Agreements and the Margins of Imports. Open Economies Review 23, 869-889. [CrossRef]
373. Zhenhui Xu, Jianyong Fan. 2012. China's Regional Trade and Domestic Market Integrations. Review of International Economics 20,
1052-1069. [CrossRef]
374. Celine Azemar, Julia Darby, Rodolphe Desbordes, Ian Wooton. 2012. Market Familiarity and the Location of South and North MNEs.
Economics & Politics 24:10.1111/ecpo.2012.24.issue-3, 307-345. [CrossRef]
375. Pedro Verga Matos, Horcio C. Faustino. 2012. Beta-convergence and sigma-convergence in corporate governance in Europe. Economic
Modelling 29, 2198-2204. [CrossRef]
376. Joshua Aizenman, Jake Kendall. 2012. The internationalization of venture capital. Journal of Economic Studies 39, 488-511. [CrossRef]
377. Mahmut Yasar, David Lisner, Roderick M. Rejesus. 2012. Bilateral trade impacts of temporary foreign visitor policy. Review of World
Economics 148, 501-521. [CrossRef]
378. Frdric Docquier, Hillel Rapoport, Sara Salomone. 2012. Remittances, migrants' education and immigration policy: Theory and
evidence from bilateral data. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42, 817-828. [CrossRef]
379. B. Xiong, J. Beghin. 2012. Does European aflatoxin regulation hurt groundnut exporters from Africa?. European Review of Agricultural
Economics 39, 589-609. [CrossRef]
380. Nicolas Berman, Philippe Martin. 2012. The Vulnerability of Sub-Saharan Africa to Financial Crises: The Case of Trade. IMF
Economic Review 60, 329-364. [CrossRef]
381. Nelson Villoria. 2012. The effects of China's growth on the food prices and the food exports of other developing countries. Agricultural
Economics 43:10.1111/agec.2012.43.issue-5, 499-514. [CrossRef]
382. Myoung-jae Lee, Young-sook Kim. 2012. ZERO-INFLATED ENDOGENOUS COUNT IN CENSORED MODEL: EFFECTS
OF INFORMAL FAMILY CARE ON FORMAL HEALTH CARE. Health Economics 21:10.1002/hec.v21.9, 1119-1133. [CrossRef]
383. Jean-Marc Siron, Aycil Yucer. 2012. The impact of MERCOSUR on trade of Brazilian states. Review of World Economics 148,
553-582. [CrossRef]
384. Theo S. Eicher, Lindy Helfman, Alex Lenkoski. 2012. Robust FDI determinants: Bayesian Model Averaging in the presence of
selection bias. Journal of Macroeconomics 34, 637-651. [CrossRef]
385. Mark N. Harris, Lszl Knya, Lszl Mtys. 2012. Some Stylized Facts about International Trade Flows. Review of International
Economics 20:10.1111/roie.2012.20.issue-4, 781-792. [CrossRef]
386. Oliver Falck, Stephan Heblich, Alfred Lameli, Jens Sdekum. 2012. Dialects, cultural identity, and economic exchange. Journal of
Urban Economics 72, 225-239. [CrossRef]
387. Yue Ma, Baozhi Qu, Yifan Zhang. 2012. Complex Goods' Exports and Institutions: Empirics at the Firm Level. Review of International
Economics 20:10.1111/roie.2012.20.issue-4, 841-853. [CrossRef]
388. Geraldine A. Wu. 2012. The Effect of Going Public on Innovative Productivity and Exploratory Search. Organization Science 23,
928-950. [CrossRef]
389. Gianfranco De Simone, Miriam Manchin. 2012. Outward Migration and Inward FDI: Factor Mobility between Eastern and Western
Europe. Review of International Economics 20:10.1111/roie.2012.20.issue-3, 600-615. [CrossRef]
390. Faqin Lin, Nicholas C.S. Sim. 2012. Death of distance and the distance puzzle. Economics Letters 116, 225-228. [CrossRef]
391. Peter H. Egger, Andrea Lassmann. 2012. The language effect in international trade: A meta-analysis. Economics Letters 116, 221-224.
[CrossRef]
392. Aitor Garmendia, Carlos Llano, Asier Minondo, Francisco Requena. 2012. Networks and the disappearance of the intranational home
bias. Economics Letters 116, 178-182. [CrossRef]
393. N. Voigtlander, H.-J. Voth. 2012. Persecution Perpetuated: The Medieval Origins of Anti-Semitic Violence in Nazi Germany. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics 127, 1339-1392. [CrossRef]
394. Pascal L. Ghazalian, Lota D. Tamini, Bruno Larue, Jean-Philippe Gervais. 2012. A gravity model to account for vertical linkages
between markets with an application to the cattle/beef sector. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 21, 579-601.
[CrossRef]
395. Segun Goh, Keumsook Lee, Jong Soo Park, M. Y. Choi. 2012. Modification of the gravity model and application to the metropolitan
Seoul subway system. Physical Review E 86. . [CrossRef]
396. Giulia Bettin, Alessia Lo Turco. 2012. A Cross-Country View on South-North Migration and Trade: Dissecting the Channels.
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 48, 4-29. [CrossRef]
397. Kevin N. Alschuler, Laura E. Gibbons, Dori E. Rosenberg, Dawn M. Ehde, Aimee M. Verrall, Alyssa M. Bamer, Mark P. Jensen.
2012. Body mass index and waist circumference in persons aging with muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, post-polio syndrome,
and spinal cord injury. Disability and Health Journal 5, 177-184. [CrossRef]
398. Michle Belot, Sjef Ederveen. 2012. Cultural barriers in migration between OECD countries. Journal of Population Economics 25,
1077-1105. [CrossRef]
399. A. Klein, N. Crafts. 2012. Making sense of the manufacturing belt: determinants of U.S. industrial location, 1880-1920. Journal of
Economic Geography 12, 775-807. [CrossRef]
400. Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, Dilip Dutta. 2012. The Gravity Model Analysis of Bangladesh's Trade: A Panel Data Approach. Journal
of Asia-Pacific Business 13, 263-286. [CrossRef]
401. Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2012. The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and
International Trade. Annual Review of Economics 4, 283-313. [CrossRef]
402. Derek Kellenberg. 2012. Trading wastes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64, 68-87. [CrossRef]
403. Andr C. Jordaan, Joel H. Eita. 2012. Determinants of South Africa's exports of leather products. Agrekon 51, 38-52. [CrossRef]
404. J. de Sousa, J. Lochard. 2012. Trade and Colonial Status. Journal of African Economies 21, 409-439. [CrossRef]
405. Pascal L. Ghazalian. 2012. Home Bias in Primary Agricultural and Processed Food Trade: Assessing the Effects of National Degree
of Uncertainty Aversion. Journal of Agricultural Economics 63, 265-290. [CrossRef]
406. Katheryn Niles Russ. 2012. Exchange rate volatility and first-time entry by multinational firms. Review of World Economics 148,
269-295. [CrossRef]
407. Gregory Corcos, Massimo Del Gatto, Giordano Mion, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano. 2012. Productivity and Firm Selection: Quantifying
the New Gains from Trade*. The Economic Journal 122, 754-798. [CrossRef]
408. Simone Juhasz Silva, Douglas Nelson. 2012. Does Aid Cause Trade? Evidence from an Asymmetric Gravity Model. The World Economy
35:10.1111/twec.2012.35.issue-5, 545-577. [CrossRef]
409. Yuan Li, John C. Beghin. 2012. A meta-analysis of estimates of the impact of technical barriers to trade. Journal of Policy Modeling
34, 497-511. [CrossRef]
410. Gordon H Hanson. 2012. The Rise of Middle Kingdoms: Emerging Economies in Global Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives
26, 41-64. [CrossRef]
411. Yoko Asuyama. 2012. Skill Distribution and Comparative Advantage: A Comparison of China and India. World Development 40,
956-969. [CrossRef]
412. Michele Fratianni, Francesco Marchionne. 2012. Trade Costs and Economic Development. Economic Geography 88:10.1111/
ecge.2012.88.issue-2, 137-163. [CrossRef]
413. Guo-xue WEI, Ji-kun HUANG, Jun YANG. 2012. Honey Safety Standards and Its Impacts on China's Honey Export. Journal of
Integrative Agriculture 11, 684-693. [CrossRef]
414. Oxana Babeck Kucharukov, Jan Babeck, Martin Raiser. 2012. Gravity Approach for Modelling International Trade in SouthEastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: The Role of Geography, Policy and Institutions. Open Economies
Review 23, 277-301. [CrossRef]
415. John Francis, Yuqing Zheng. 2012. Trade, Geography, and Industry Growth in U.S. Manufacturing. Southern Economic Journal 78,
1222-1241. [CrossRef]
416. Tomasz Michalski, Evren Ors. 2012. (Interstate) Banking and (interstate) trade: Does real integration follow financial integration?.
Journal of Financial Economics 104, 89-117. [CrossRef]
417. YVES BOURDET, MARIA PERSSON. 2012. Completing the European Union Customs Union: The Effects of Trade Procedure
Harmonization*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50:10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-2, 300-314. [CrossRef]
418. Theo S. Eicher, Christian Henn, Chris Papageorgiou. 2012. Trade creation and diversion revisited: Accounting for model uncertainty
and natural trading partner effects. Journal of Applied Econometrics 27:10.1002/jae.v27.2, 296-321. [CrossRef]
419. Ines Buono, Guy Lalanne. 2012. The effect of the Uruguay round on the intensive and extensive margins of trade. Journal of
International Economics 86, 269-283. [CrossRef]
420. Raj Aggarwal, Colm Kearney, Brian Lucey. 2012. Gravity and culture in foreign portfolio investment. Journal of Banking & Finance
36, 525-538. [CrossRef]
421. Donata Bessey. 2012. International student migration to Germany. Empirical Economics 42, 345-361. [CrossRef]
422. Mara Pa Olivero, Yoto V. Yotov. 2012. Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Canadian Journal of
Economics/Revue canadienne d'conomique 45:10.1111/caje.2012.45.issue-1, 64-92. [CrossRef]
423. Valeria Costantini, Massimiliano Mazzanti. 2012. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of
environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy 41, 132-153. [CrossRef]
424. Nicolas Sauter. 2012. Talking trade: language barriers in intra-Canadian commerce. Empirical Economics 42, 301-323. [CrossRef]
425. Jean-Marie Grether, Nicole Andra Mathys, Jaime de Melo. 2012. Unravelling the worldwide pollution haven effect. The Journal of
International Trade & Economic Development 21, 131-162. [CrossRef]
426. Cline Carrre. 2012. UEMOA, CEMAC: quelle performance en matire de commerce?. Revue d'conomie du dveloppement 27,
33. [CrossRef]
427. Vincent Vicard. 2012. Trade, conflict, and political integration: Explaining the heterogeneity of regional trade agreements. European
Economic Review 56, 54-71. [CrossRef]
428. Willem Thorbecke, Atsuyuki Kato. 2012. The effect of exchange rate changes on Japanese consumption exports. Japan and the World
Economy 24, 64-71. [CrossRef]
429. Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch. 2012. Migration, Trade and Unemployment. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal
6, 1. [CrossRef]
430. Anna D'Souza. 2012. The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention: Changing the currents of trade. Journal of Development Economics 97,
73-87. [CrossRef]
431. Lasa Ro'i, Marc-Alexandre Sngas. 2012. Bilateral trade, colonial heritage and common currency arrangements: An Oceanian
perspective. International Economics 129, 63-98. [CrossRef]
432. Rahul Giri. 2012. Local costs of distribution, international trade costs and micro evidence on the law of one price. Journal of International
Economics 86, 82-100. [CrossRef]
433. J. H. Grant, K. A. Boys. 2012. Agricultural Trade and the GATT/WTO: Does Membership Make a Difference?. American Journal
of Agricultural Economics 94, 1-24. [CrossRef]
434. Ivan T. Kandilov, Thomas Grennes. 2012. The determinants of service offshoring: Does distance matter?. Japan and the World Economy
24, 36-43. [CrossRef]
435. Hyun-Hoon Lee, Hyeon-seung Huh, Won Joong Kim. 2012. Cross-border portfolio investment in the APEC region. Japan and the
World Economy 24, 44-56. [CrossRef]
436. Athiwat Sukanuntathum. 2012. Robust Estimation of Gravity Models under Heteroskedasticity and Data Censoring. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences 40, 731-735. [CrossRef]
437. NIKOLAUS WOLF, MAX-STEPHAN SCHULZE, HANS-CHRISTIAN HEINEMEYER. 2011. On the Economic Consequences
of the Peace: Trade and Borders After Versailles. The Journal of Economic History 71, 915-949. [CrossRef]
438. Bernard Hoekman, Alessandro Nicita. 2011. Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade. World Development 39,
2069-2079. [CrossRef]
439. Kazunobu Hayakawa. 2011. Measuring fixed costs for firms use of a free trade agreement: Threshold regression approach. Economics
Letters 113, 301-303. [CrossRef]
440. Natalie Chen, Dennis Novy. 2011. Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries. Journal of International Economics
85, 206-221. [CrossRef]
441. Wolfgang Hess, Maria Persson. 2011. Exploring the duration of EU imports. Review of World Economics 147, 665-692. [CrossRef]
442. Andrew J. Cassey. 2011. State Foreign Export Patterns. Southern Economic Journal 78, 308-329. [CrossRef]
443. Carlos Llano-Verduras, Asier Minondo, Francisco Requena-Silvente. 2011. Is the Border Effect an Artefact of Geographical
Aggregation?. The World Economy 34:10.1111/twec.2011.34.issue-10, 1771-1787. [CrossRef]
444. P. Cardamone. 2011. The effect of preferential trade agreements on monthly fruit exports to the European Union. European Review
of Agricultural Economics 38, 553-586. [CrossRef]
445. Gabriel Felbermayr, Wilhelm KohlerModelling the Extensive Margin of World Trade: New Evidence on GATT and WTO
Membership 92-130. [CrossRef]
446. Pierre Azoulay, Joshua S. Graff Zivin, Gustavo Manso. 2011. Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences. The
RAND Journal of Economics 42:10.1111/rand.2011.42.issue-3, 527-554. [CrossRef]
447. Neil Foster, Robert Stehrer. 2011. Preferential trade agreements and the structure of international trade. Review of World Economics
147, 385-409. [CrossRef]
448. James E. Anderson. 2011. The Gravity Model. Annual Review of Economics 3, 133-160. [CrossRef]
449. Gianluca Cafiso. 2011. Sectoral border effects and the geographic concentration of production. Review of World Economics 147, 543-566.
[CrossRef]
450. Florian Mlders, Ulrich Volz. 2011. Trade creation and the status of FTAs: empirical evidence from East Asia. Review of World
Economics 147, 429-456. [CrossRef]
451. Valentina Raimondi, Alessandro Olper. 2011. Trade Elasticity, Gravity and Trade Liberalisation: Evidence from the Food Industry.
Journal of Agricultural Economics 62:10.1111/jage.2011.62.issue-3, 525-550. [CrossRef]
452. Giovanni Pica, Jos V. Rodrguez Mora. 2011. Who's afraid of a globalized world? Foreign Direct Investments, local knowledge and
allocation of talents. Journal of International Economics 85, 86-101. [CrossRef]
453. Gabriel Felbermayr, Julien Prat, Hans-Jrg Schmerer. 2011. Trade and unemployment: What do the data say?. European Economic
Review 55, 741-758. [CrossRef]
454. Peter Egger, Mario Larch, Kevin E Staub, Rainer Winkelmann. 2011. The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade
Agreements. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3, 113-143. [CrossRef]
455. J.M.C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro. 2011. Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum
likelihood estimator. Economics Letters 112, 220-222. [CrossRef]
456. Anca D. Cristea. 2011. Buyer-seller relationships in international trade: Evidence from U.S. States' exports and business-class travel.
Journal of International Economics 84, 207-220. [CrossRef]
457. Marilyne Huchet-Bourdon, Angela Cheptea. 2011. Informal barriers and agricultural trade: does monetary integration matter?.
Agricultural Economics 42, 519-530. [CrossRef]
458. Alfredo Jimnez. 2011. Political Risk as a Determinant of Southern European FDI in Neighboring Developing Countries. Emerging
Markets Finance and Trade 47, 59-74. [CrossRef]
459. Hajime Katayama, Mark Melatos. 2011. The nonlinear impact of currency unions on bilateral trade. Economics Letters 112, 94-96.
[CrossRef]
460. Tom Konen. 2011. Expatriates and Trade. Journal of International Migration and Integration . [CrossRef]
461. Byron S. Gangnes, Alyson C. Ma, Ari Van Assche. 2011. China's exports in a world of increasing oil prices. Multinational Business
Review 19, 133-151. [CrossRef]
462. Marcella Nicolini. 2011. On the evolution of institutional comparative advantages. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 22,
162-172. [CrossRef]
463. Kai Sun, Daniel J. Henderson, Subal C. Kumbhakar. 2011. Biases in approximating log production. Journal of Applied Econometrics
26:10.1002/jae.v26.4, 708-714. [CrossRef]
464. Bernhard Herz, Marco Wagner. 2011. The Real Impact of GATT/WTO - a Generalised Approach. The World Economy 34:10.1111/
twec.2011.34.issue-6, 1014-1041. [CrossRef]
465. Innwon Park, Soonchan Park. 2011. Best practices for regional trade agreements. Review of World Economics 147, 249-268. [CrossRef]
466. Pascal L. Ghazalian, Bruno Larue, Jean-Philippe Gervais. 2011. Assessing the implications of regional preferential market access for
meat commodities. Agribusiness 27:10.1002/agr.v27.3, 292-310. [CrossRef]
467. Debasri Mukherjee, Susan Pozo. 2011. Exchange-rate volatility and trade: a semiparametric approach. Applied Economics 43, 1617-1627.
[CrossRef]
468. Peter Egger, David Greenaway, Tobias Seidel. 2011. Rigid labour markets with trade and capital mobility: theory and evidence.
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'conomique 44:10.1111/caje.2011.44.issue-2, 509-540. [CrossRef]
469. Peter Egger, Doina Maria Radulescu. 2011. Labor Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment*. Scandinavian Journal of Economics nono. [CrossRef]
470. Nikolaus Wolf, Albrecht O. Ritschl. 2011. Endogeneity of Currency Areas and Trade Blocs: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.
Kyklos 64, 291-312. [CrossRef]
471. Michel Beine, Frdric Docquier, alar zden. 2011. Diasporas. Journal of Development Economics 95, 30-41. [CrossRef]
472. Imran Ullah Khan, Kaliappa Kalirajan. 2011. The impact of trade costs on exports: An empirical modeling. Economic Modelling 28,
1341-1347. [CrossRef]
473. Jrme Hergueux. 2011. How does religion bias the allocation of Foreign Direct Investment? The role of institutions. International
Economics 128, 53-76. [CrossRef]
474. Michele U. Fratianni, Francesco Marchionne, Chang Hoon Oh. 2011. A commentary on the gravity equation in international business
research. Multinational Business Review 19, 36-46. [CrossRef]
475. David S. Jacks, Christopher M. Meissner, Dennis Novy. 2011. Trade booms, trade busts, and trade costs. Journal of International
Economics 83, 185-201. [CrossRef]
476. Joakim Westerlund, Fredrik Wilhelmsson. 2011. Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics
43, 641-649. [CrossRef]
477. Peter Egger, Mario Larch. 2011. An assessment of the Europe agreements effects on bilateral trade, GDP, and welfare. European
Economic Review 55, 263-279. [CrossRef]
478. Luc Bauwens, Giordano Mion, Jacques-Franois Thisse. 2011. The Resistible Decline of European Science. Recherches conomiques
de Louvain 77, 5. [CrossRef]
479. Johannes Brcker, Artem Korzhenevych, Marie-Catherine Riekhof. 2011. Predicting freight flows in a globalising world. Research in
Transportation Economics 31, 37-44. [CrossRef]
480. Allen Dennis, Ben Shepherd. 2011. Trade Facilitation and Export Diversification. The World Economy 34:10.1111/
twec.2011.34.issue-1, 101-122. [CrossRef]
481. Huigang Chen, Alin Mirestean, Charalambos Tsangarides. 2011. Limited Information Bayesian Model Averaging for Dynamic Panels
with an Application to a Trade Gravity Model. IMF Working Papers 11, 1. [CrossRef]
482. Harris Selod, Klaus Deininger, Rabah Arezki. 2011. What drives the global land rush?. IMF Working Papers 11, 1. [CrossRef]
483. Harald Badinger, Peter Egger. 2010. Horizontal vs. Vertical Interdependence in Multinational Activity*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics
and Statistics 72:10.1111/obes.2010.72.issue-6, 744-768. [CrossRef]
484. L. D. Tamini, J.-P. Gervais, B. Larue. 2010. Trade liberalisation effects on agricultural goods at different processing stages. European
Review of Agricultural Economics 37, 453-477. [CrossRef]
485. Michael E Waugh. 2010. International Trade and Income Differences. American Economic Review 100, 2093-2124. [CrossRef]
486. Francesco Aiello, Paola Cardamone, Maria Rosaria Agostino. 2010. Evaluating the impact of nonreciprocal trade preferences using
gravity models. Applied Economics 42, 3745-3760. [CrossRef]
487. James E Anderson, Yoto V Yotov. 2010. The Changing Incidence of Geography. American Economic Review 100, 2157-2186. [CrossRef]
488. Davin Chor. 2010. Unpacking sources of comparative advantage: A quantitative approach. Journal of International Economics 82,
152-167. [CrossRef]
489. Gabriel Felbermayr, Wilhelm Kohler. 2010. Modelling the Extensive Margin of World Trade: New Evidence on GATT and WTO
Membership. The World Economy 33:10.1111/twec.2010.33.issue-11, 1430-1469. [CrossRef]
490. Marie Daumal, Soledad Zignago. 2010. Measure and determinants of border effects of Brazilian states. Papers in Regional Science
89:10.1111/pirs.2010.89.issue-4, 735-758. [CrossRef]
491. Giovanni Peri, Francisco Requena-Silvente. 2010. The trade creation effect of immigrants: evidence from the remarkable case of Spain.
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'conomique 43, 1433-1459. [CrossRef]
492. L. Sun, M. R. Reed. 2010. Impacts of Free Trade Agreements on Agricultural Trade Creation and Trade Diversion. American Journal
of Agricultural Economics 92, 1351-1363. [CrossRef]
493. Ivan T. Kandilov, Thomas Grennes. 2010. The determinants of service exports from Central and Eastern Europe. Economics of
Transition 18, 763-794. [CrossRef]
494. Lucio Picci. 2010. The internationalization of inventive activity: A gravity model using patent data. Research Policy 39, 1070-1081.
[CrossRef]
495. J.M.C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro. 2010. Currency Unions in Prospect and Retrospect. Annual Review of Economics 2, 51-74.
[CrossRef]
496. Daniele Fabbri, Silvana Robone. 2010. The geography of hospital admission in a national health service with patient choice. Health
Economics 19, 1029-1047. [CrossRef]
497. Ben shepherd. 2010. Geographical Diversification of Developing Country Exports. World Development 38, 1217-1228. [CrossRef]
498. Waverly W. Ding, Sharon G. Levin, Paula E. Stephan, Anne E. Winkler. 2010. The Impact of Information Technology on Academic
Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns. Management Science 56, 1439-1461. [CrossRef]
499. STEFAN BOES. 2010. Count Data Models with Correlated Unobserved Heterogeneity. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 37:10.1111/
sjos.2010.37.issue-3, 382-402. [CrossRef]
500. Mariarosaria Agostino, Federica Demaria, Francesco Trivieri. 2010. Non-Reciprocal Trade Preferences and the Role of Compliance
Costs in the Agricultural Sector: Exports to the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61, 652-679. [CrossRef]
501. Jayjit Roy. 2010. Do Customs Union Members Engage in More Bilateral Trade than Free-Trade Agreement Members?. Review of
International Economics 18:10.1111/roie.2010.18.issue-4, 663-681. [CrossRef]
502. Anne-Clia Disdier, Lionel Fontagn. 2010. Trade impact of European measures on GMOs condemned by the WTO panel. Review
of World Economics 146, 495-514. [CrossRef]
503. Hylke Vandenbussche, Maurizio Zanardi. 2010. The chilling trade effects of antidumping proliferation. European Economic Review
54, 760-777. [CrossRef]
504. Maarten Bosker, Harry Garretsen. 2010. Trade costs in empirical New Economic Geography. Papers in Regional Science 89, 485-511.
[CrossRef]
505. Ting Chi, Peter P.D. Kilduff. 2010. An empirical investigation of the determinants and shifting patterns of US apparel imports using
a gravity model framework. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 14, 501-520. [CrossRef]
506. Elisa Giuliani, Andrea Morrison, Carlo Pietrobelli, Roberta Rabellotti. 2010. Who are the researchers that are collaborating with
industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy 39, 748-761. [CrossRef]
507. FABIAN BARTHEL, MATTHIAS BUSSE, ERIC NEUMAYER. 2010. THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE TAXATION TREATIES
ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: EVIDENCE FROM LARGE DYADIC PANEL DATA. Contemporary Economic Policy
28:10.1111/coep.2010.28.issue-3, 366-377. [CrossRef]
508. S. Jayasinghe, J. C. Beghin, G. Moschini. 2010. Determinants of World Demand for U.S. Corn Seeds: The Role of Trade Costs.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92, 999-1010. [CrossRef]
509. C. Bagoulla, E. Chevassus-Lozza, K. Daniel, C. Gaigne. 2010. Regional Production Adjustment to Import Competition: Evidence
from the French Agro-Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92, 1040-1050. [CrossRef]
510. Mohammad Masudur Rahman, Laila Arjuman Ara. 2010. Bangladesh trade potential: a dynamic gravity approach. Journal of
International Trade Law and Policy 9, 130-147. [CrossRef]
511. Giorgio Fagiolo. 2010. The international-trade network: gravity equations and topological properties. Journal of Economic Interaction
and Coordination 5, 1-25. [CrossRef]
512. Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, John Ries. 2010. The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International
Economics 81, 1-14. [CrossRef]
513. Gabriel J. Felbermayr, Sanne Hiller, Davide Sala. 2010. Does immigration boost per capita income?. Economics Letters 107, 177-179.
[CrossRef]
514. J.M.C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro. 2010. On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression. Economics
Letters 107, 310-312. [CrossRef]
515. Maria Bas, Ivan Ledezma. 2010. Trade integration and within-plant productivity evolution in Chile. Review of World Economics 146,
113-146. [CrossRef]
516. Matthias Busse, Jens Kniger, Peter Nunnenkamp. 2010. FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: more than a bit?.
Review of World Economics 146, 147-177. [CrossRef]
517. Christian Volpe Martincus, Antoni Estevadeordal, Andrs Gallo, Jessica Luna. 2010. Information barriers, export promotion
institutions, and the extensive margin of trade. Review of World Economics 146, 91-111. [CrossRef]
518. Eric Neumayer. 2010. Visa Restrictions and Bilateral Travel. The Professional Geographer 62, 171-181. [CrossRef]
519. Miaojie Yu. 2010. Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation. Journal of Development Economics 91, 289-300. [CrossRef]
520. RODOLPHE DESBORDES. 2010. GLOBAL AND DIPLOMATIC POLITICAL RISKS AND FOREIGN DIRECT
INVESTMENT. Economics & Politics 22:10.1111/ecpo.2010.22.issue-1, 92-125. [CrossRef]
521. Daniel Lederman, Marcelo Olarreaga, Lucy Payton. 2010. Export promotion agencies: Do they work?. Journal of Development Economics
91, 257-265. [CrossRef]
522. Alberto Salvo. 2010. Trade flows in a spatial oligopoly: gravity fits well, but what does it explain?. Canadian Journal of Economics/
Revue canadienne d'conomique 43, 63-96. [CrossRef]
523. Peter Egger. 2010. Bilateral FDI potentials for Austria. Empirica 37, 5-17. [CrossRef]
524. Jrn Kleinert, Farid Toubal. 2010. Gravity for FDI. Review of International Economics 18:10.1111/roie.2010.18.issue-1, 1-13. [CrossRef]
525. H. Boulhol, A. de Serres. 2010. Have developed countries escaped the curse of distance?. Journal of Economic Geography 10, 113-139.
[CrossRef]
526. T. S. Aidt, M. Gassebner. 2010. Do Autocratic States Trade Less?. The World Bank Economic Review 24, 38-76. [CrossRef]
527. Anne-Clia Disdier, Silvio H. T. Tai, Lionel Fontagn, Thierry Mayer. 2010. Bilateral trade of cultural goods. Review of World
Economics 145, 575-595. [CrossRef]
528. Laura Mrquez-Ramos, Inmaculada Martnez-Zarzoso. 2010. The Effect of Technological Innovation on International Trade. A
Nonlinear Approach. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4, 1. [CrossRef]
529. Mahvash Saeed Qureshi, Charalambos G. Tsangarides. 2010. The Empirics of Exchange Rate Regimes and Trade: Words vs. Deeds.
IMF Working Papers 10, 1. [CrossRef]
530. Edmund Amann, Barry Lau, Frederick Nixson. 2009. Did China Hurt the Textiles and Clothing Exports of Other Asian Economies,
19902005?. Oxford Development Studies 37, 333-362. [CrossRef]
531. Simon W. Schlueter, Christine Wieck, Thomas Heckelei. 2009. Regulatory Policies in Meat Trade: Is There Evidence for Least Tradedistorting Sanitary Regulations?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91:10.1111/ajae.2009.91.issue-5, 1484-1490. [CrossRef]
532. Markus Lampe. 2009. Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade: Evidence for the Cobden-Chevalier Network,
1860-1875. The Journal of Economic History 69, 1012. [CrossRef]
533. PIERRE AZOULAY, WAVERLY DING, TOBY STUART. 2009. THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC PATENTING ON THE
RATE, QUALITY AND DIRECTION OF (PUBLIC) RESEARCH OUTPUT. The Journal of Industrial Economics 57:10.1111/
joie.2009.57.issue-4, 637-676. [CrossRef]
534. W. Czubala, B. Shepherd, J. S. Wilson. 2009. Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonised Standards on African Exports. Journal
of African Economies 18, 711-744. [CrossRef]
535. Rabin Hattari, Ramkishen S. Rajan. 2009. Understanding bilateral FDI flows in developing Asia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
23:10.1111/apel.2009.23.issue-2, 73-93. [CrossRef]
536. Niven Winchester. 2009. Is there a dirty little secret? Non-tariff barriers and the gains from trade. Journal of Policy Modeling 31,
819-834. [CrossRef]
537. Charalambos Tsangarides, Pierre Ewenczyk, Michal Hulej, Mahvash Saeed Qureshi. 2009. Are Africa's Currency Unions Good for
Trade?. IMF Staff Papers 56, 876-918. [CrossRef]
538. N. B. Villoria. 2009. China and the Manufacturing Terms-of-Trade of African Exporters. Journal of African Economies 18, 781-823.
[CrossRef]
539. Marius Brlhart, Federico Trionfetti. 2009. A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased. European Economic Review 53,
830-845. [CrossRef]
540. Kevin E. Staub. 2009. Simple Tests for Exogeneity of a Binary Explanatory Variable in Count Data Regression Models. Communications
in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38, 1834-1855. [CrossRef]
541. Ben Shepherd, John S. Wilson. 2009. Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries: Measuring progress and assessing priorities.
Journal of Asian Economics 20, 367-383. [CrossRef]
542. Rodolphe Desbordes, Vincent Vicard. 2009. Foreign direct investment and bilateral investment treaties: An international political
perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics 37, 372-386. [CrossRef]
543. Xuepeng Liu. 2009. GATT/WTO Promotes Trade Strongly: Sample Selection and Model Specification. Review of International
Economics 17:10.1111/roie.2009.17.issue-3, 428-446. [CrossRef]
544. Jihyung Hong, Frank Windmeijer, Diego Novick, Josep Maria Haro, Jacqueline Brown. 2009. The cost of relapse in patients with
schizophrenia in the European SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes) study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and
Biological Psychiatry 33, 835-841. [CrossRef]
545. Silvio H. T. Tai. 2009. Market structure and the link between migration and trade. Review of World Economics 145, 225-249. [CrossRef]
546. Thomas L. Vollrath, Mark J. Gehlhar, Charles B. Hallahan. 2009. Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other
Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing. Journal of Agricultural Economics 60:10.1111/jage.2009.60.issue-2,
298-317. [CrossRef]
547. Brent Neiman, Phillip Swagel. 2009. The impact of post-9/11 visa policies on travel to the United States. Journal of International
Economics 78, 86-99. [CrossRef]
548. Martijn Burger, Frank van Oort, Gert-Jan Linders. 2009. On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros
and Zero-inflated Estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis 4, 167-190. [CrossRef]
549. Boriss Siliverstovs, Dieter Schumacher. 2009. Estimating gravity equations: to log or not to log?. Empirical Economics 36, 645-669.
[CrossRef]
550. Hans-Martin Zademach, Andrs Rodrguez-Pose. 2009. Cross-Border M&As and the Changing Economic Geography of Europe.
European Planning Studies 17, 765-789. [CrossRef]
551. Katheryn N. Russ. 2009. The New Theory of Foreign Direct Investment: Merging Trade and Capital Flows. International Finance
12:10.1111/infi.2009.12.issue-1, 107-119. [CrossRef]
552. Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, John Ries. 2009. How remote is the offshoring threat?. European Economic Review 53, 429-444. [CrossRef]
553. Maggie X. Chen. 2009. Regional economic integration and geographic concentration of multinational firms. European Economic Review
53, 355-375. [CrossRef]
554. Matthias Helble, Ben Shepherd, John S. Wilson. 2009. Transparency and Regional Integration in the Asia Pacific. World Economy
32:10.1111/twec.2009.32.issue-3, 479-508. [CrossRef]
555. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. 2009. Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects
using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics 77, 77-85. [CrossRef]
556. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. 2009. Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching
econometrics. Journal of International Economics 77, 63-76. [CrossRef]
557. Jos De Sousa, Olivier Lamotte. 2009. Sparation politique et dsintgration commerciale. Revue conomique 60, 891. [CrossRef]
558. Nicolas Coeurdacier, Roberto A. De Santis, Antonin Aviat. 2009. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions and European integration.
Economic Policy 24:10.1111/ecop.2009.24.issue-57, 55-106. [CrossRef]
559. M. Bosker, H. Garretsen. 2008. Economic development and the geography of institutions. Journal of Economic Geography 9, 295-328.
[CrossRef]
560. Helge Berger, Volker Nitsch. 2008. Zooming out: The trade effect of the euro in historical perspective. Journal of International Money
and Finance 27, 1244-1260. [CrossRef]
561. Hildegunn Kyvik Nords. 2008. Gatekeepers to consumer markets: the role of retailers in international trade. The International Review
of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 18, 449-472. [CrossRef]
562. Isabel Proena, Maria Paula Fontoura, Enrique Martnez-Galn. 2008. Trade in the enlarged European Union: a new approach on
trade potential. Portuguese Economic Journal 7, 205-224. [CrossRef]
563. Roger White, Bedassa Tadesse. 2008. Immigrants, cultural distance and U.S. state-level exports of cultural products. The North
American Journal of Economics and Finance 19, 331-348. [CrossRef]
564. G.-J. M. Linders, M. J. Burger, F. G. van Oort. 2008. A rather empty world: the many faces of distance and the persistent resistance
to international trade. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1, 439-458. [CrossRef]
565. Samih Antoine Azar. 2008. Jensens Inequality in Finance. International Advances in Economic Research 14, 433-440. [CrossRef]
566. Marissa D King, Heather A Haveman. 2008. Antislavery in America: The Press, the Pulpit, and the Rise of Antislavery Societies.
Administrative Science Quarterly 53, 492-528. [CrossRef]
567. Marie Daumal. 2008. Federalism, separatism and international trade. European Journal of Political Economy 24, 675-687. [CrossRef]
568. Christopher S.P. Magee. 2008. New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics 75, 349-362.
[CrossRef]
569. Badi H. Baltagi, Peter Egger, Michael Pfaffermayr. 2008. Estimating regional trade agreement effects on FDI in an interdependent
world. Journal of Econometrics 145, 194-208. [CrossRef]
570. Richard Kneller, Mauro Pisu, Zhihong Yu. 2008. Overseas business costs and firm export performance. Canadian Journal of Economics/
Revue canadienne d'conomique 41:10.1111/caje.2008.41.issue-2, 639-669. [CrossRef]
571. Peter Egger. 2008. De Facto exchange rate arrangement tightness and bilateral trade flows. Economics Letters 99, 228-232. [CrossRef]
572. Alessandro Olper, Valentina Raimondi. 2008. Agricultural market integration in the OECD: A gravity-border effect approach. Food
Policy 33, 165-175. [CrossRef]
573. Doireann Fitzgerald. 2008. Can trade costs explain why exchange rate volatility does not feed into consumer prices?. Journal of Monetary
Economics 55, 606-628. [CrossRef]
574. Daniel J. Henderson, Daniel L. Millimet. 2008. Is gravity linear?. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23:10.1002/jae.v23:2, 137-172.
[CrossRef]
575. Massimo Del Gatto, Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, Marcello Pagnini. 2008. OPENNESS TO TRADE AND INDUSTRY COST
DISPERSION: EVIDENCE FROM A PANEL OF ITALIAN FIRMS*. Journal of Regional Science 48:10.1111/jors.2008.48.issue-1,
97-129. [CrossRef]
576. Keith Head, John Ries. 2008. FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: Theory and evidence. Journal of International
Economics 74, 2-20. [CrossRef]
577. Martin Knapp, Frank Windmeijer, Jacqueline Brown, Stathis Kontodimas, Spyridon Tzivelekis, Josep Maria Haro, Mark Ratcliffe,
Jihyung Hong, Diego Novick. 2008. Cost-Utility Analysis of Treatment with Olanzapine Compared with Other Antipsychotic
Treatments in Patients with Schizophrenia in the Pan-European SOHO Study. PharmacoEconomics 26, 341-358. [CrossRef]
578. Lionel Fontagn, Guillaume Gaulier, Soledad Zignago. 2008. Specialization across varieties and North-South competition. Economic
Policy 23, 51-91. [CrossRef]
579. Andrei A. Levchenko, Julian di Giovanni. 2008. Trade Openness and Volatility. IMF Working Papers 08, 1. [CrossRef]
580. Mahvash Saeed Qureshi. 2008. Africa's Oil Abundance and External Competitiveness: Do Institutions Matter?. IMF Working Papers
08, 1. [CrossRef]
581. Quy-Toan Do, Andrei A. Levchenko. 2007. Comparative advantage, demand for external finance, and financial development. Journal
of Financial Economics 86, 796-834. [CrossRef]
582. Boriss Siliverstovs, Dieter Schumacher. 2007. Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade: another
look. Applied Economics Letters 14, 1065-1073. [CrossRef]
583. Markus LampeBilateral trade flows in Europe, 18571875: A new dataset 81-155. [CrossRef]
584. Sean KaskModes of Open Innovation in Service Industries and Process Innovation 137-158. [CrossRef]
585. Sean KaskModes of Open Innovation in Service Industries and Process Innovation 15-36. [CrossRef]