Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The lack of political will on the part of the governments to make laws work
means that government action to fight corruption is largely ineffective,
From a report of Transparency International
Lands of any state are never corrupt. These always continue to grow crops, offer
mineral & water resources and accommodate citizens. Owners of a home built and
maintained at the cost of sacrifices of lives, honour and assets of life long physical
and mental hardships, will never even think of destroying it. Evidently for
internationally declared corrupt states of the world, corrupt politicians are the
culprits. They are personification of destructive corruption in the states. Their
misappropriations are the source of incentive for illegal gains in departments and
all categories of business. No state is corrupt, no nation is corrupt and no nation is
unprincipled. Top corrupt leadership, in all circumstances, sustains and promotes
corruptions and misappropriations. Transparency Internationals term Corrupt
States stands to be ambiguous and as such must be replaced by Corrupt
Politicians States.
Corruption, is a word easy to speak, but embezzlement of hundreds of billions
per annum in one single state, forming a sizeable part of its annual budget,
demands culprits behind bars in punishment for depriving poors of adequate meals
and medical treatment, in cities and in far flung areas.
Corrupt individuals joining politics are the product of anti social mode of rearing
by basically or practically Godless parents or guardians, devoid of concern for all
human beings. They do not abide by any of the recognized codes of conduct. Their
encouraged by his boundless corruptions, depletes the diet value of meager meals
of the poors, making them easy prey to numerous major and minor diseases. He
does not understand that public dealing individuals and stockists of edibles are
encouraged by his corruptions, affecting every aspect of lives of citizens especially
the poor. From the lines of history, Nausherwan Adil Anushiravan the Just (531
579 CE), of Iran asked his attendant to bring a small quantity of food salt from the
nearby village, ordering him to make payment for that. On an expression of
surprise on the face of the attendant in consideration to insignificant price of the
salt, Nausherwan explained that if ruler grabs an apple from orchard without
payment, all his employees will loot the entire orchard. So what to talk of a whole
group of corrupt politician one single corrupt politician spreads corruption from
top to bottom. Incentive grips employees of all government and private
departments, shopkeepers and down to cobbler on roadside
1. What is corruption?
Defining corruption can be a challenge. It takes many forms, and
perpetrators are skilled in developing new ways to be corrupt and cover their
tracks. Much thought has been devoted to developing different definitions of
corruption but, despite its complex nature, most people can recognise a
corrupt act when they see it.
Corruption may be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for private
gain[1]. This definition captures three elements of corruption. One,
corruption occurs in both the public and private sectors (and media and
civil society actors are not exempt). Two, it involves abusing power held in
a state institution or a private organisation. Three, the bribe-taker (or a
third party or, for example, an organisation such as a political party) as well
as the bribe-giver benefit, whether it be in terms of money or an undue
advantage. Sometimes the advantage gained by the bribe-giver may not be
undue or clear cut but is nonetheless an advantage. For example, in a
corrupt society where the right to access public services such as health or
education can be only secured by paying an unlawful bribe, those who can
afford to pay have an advantage over those who cannot. In such
circumstances the bribe-givers benefit is merely that which is his or her
rightful due and bribe-takers receive an advantage for carrying out functions
that they are obliged anyway to perform.
3. Types of corruption
Many types of corrupt acts are proscribed in criminal and
administrative law in different countries. The UN Convention against
Corruption (explored further in section 5) sets out the types of corrupt
criminal behaviour that signatory states are obliged or recommended to
introduce into their legal systems. Acts can also be corrupt even if the
law does not proscribe them, and this speaks to the often slippery and
complex nature of corruption. Its manifestations constantly evolve and are
not always captured by criminal or administrative law, hence (as discussed in
section 5) prevention, rather than solely punishment, is emphasised by anticorruption practitioners.
In this section some of the most common types of corrupt acts as set
out in UNCAC are described.
Bribery takes place when a person with authority accepts or solicits a bribe
to exercise a function in a particular way. A kickback is similar to a bribe but
usually refers to a payment given in return for receiving a contract, which is
kicked back to someone involved in awarding the contract. Bribery of
foreign officials by private sector actors is also a crime in many
countries.[2] Even if a bribe does not take place in a companys country of
origin, it may still be punishable by the home countrys authorities. The fact
that not all countries proscribe such behaviour illustrates the point above
that not all corrupt acts are always illegal.
Trading in influence or influence peddling is a form of bribery. For example,
a person promises to exert an improper influence over the decision-making
process of a public official or private sector actor in return for an undue
advantage. Typically this form of corruption can be perpetrated by those in
prominent positions or with political power or connections. Such persons
connection to power, that is to say their influence, is traded for money or an
undue advantage. Not all countries criminalise this form of corruption,