Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fractional-Distillation Analysis
11. Laboratory Columns for Precise and Rapid Fractionation of
Gaseous and Liquid Samples
WALTERJ. PODBIELNIAK,
P. 0.Box 567, Tulsa, Okla.
General design and construction of fractionating
This paper reports the findings of intensiae theoretical and experimental study of precise low- and columns and apparatus.
Fractionating columns are described having a n
high-temperature laboratory fractionating columns
under the headings of the following factors which are entirely separate sleeve-like metal reflector type
shown to be of fundamental importance as well as vacuum jacket for thermal insulation at all temhighly convenient for direct experimental determina- peratures ranging from -190 C. u p to 300 C.,
within which jacket any of a large variety qf distion or control:
Composition and distilling characteristics of tilling tubes of various diameters may be inserted for
the rapid and precise fractionation of gaseous or
sample.
liquid samples ranging from a fraction of a liquid
Total time of distillation.
Regulation of distillation rate, reflux ratio, dis- cubic centimeter to as much as 20,000 cc. These
tillation pressure, and all other variables except total distilling tubes are packed with highly effectiue,
spiral, continuous, uniform, wire-coil packings
time of distillation.
Ratio of 10 times the hold-up of material in the shown to be si perior to the usual chance-arrangement
fractionating section (excluding rejlux or condenser) noncontinuous column packings. Complete distillations with the apparatus assembly described take
to maximum column capacity.
Ratio of 10 times the hold-up of material in reflux from one hour to several hours time, depending on the
requirements; and the separation accomplished in a
condenser section to maximum column capacity.
Effectiveness of column packing in securing re- single distillation is materially superior to that pospeated and intimate contact of rejluxed liquid and sible with previously described laboratory fractionating columns including even extremely tall experiascending vapor.
mental columns operated at exceedingly slow rates.
Eficiency of thermal insulation of column.
120
ANALYTICAL EDITION
Vol. 5 , No. 2
1. COMPOSITION
AND DISTILLING
CHARACTERFIGURE1. DISTILLING
TUBESAND PACKINGS
USEDIN EXPERIMENTS FACTOR
Single-wire coil, 7.9 turns per inch (3.12 turns per cm.), No. 26 (0.037
om. diameter) monel wire
B . Single-wire coil, 6.2 turns per inch (2.05 turns per om.), No. 26 monel wire
C. Single-wire coil, 7 turns per inch (2.76 turns per om.), No. 20 (0.0812
om. diameter) monel wire
Double-wire cqil: Outer coil 7 turns per inch 2.76 turns per om.), No.
20 monel wire. Inner coil. 4 turns per in06 (1.67 turns per cm.),
No. 20 monel wire
Single-wire coil 7 turns per inch (2.76 t u p s per cm.), No. 20 monel wire
Double-wire co!1: Outer coil, 7 turns per inch, No. 20 monel wire. Inner
coil, 4 turns per inch, No. 20 monel wire
Single-wire coil 7 turns per inch, No. 20 monel wire
Double-wire odil: Outer coil, 7 turns per inch, No. 20 monel wire.
Inner coil, 4 turns per inch, No. 20 monel wire
38 turns, a p roximately 43 mm: outside diameter of 5.0 mm. inside
diameter &rex standard tubing (unpacked) : total vertical length
of coiled portion 50 8 om (20 inchea). uncoiled 400 om.
Single-wire coil, 5.5 t&s pkr inch (2.16'turns per 6m.), No. 18 (0.1024
om. diameter) monel wire
Double-wire coil: Outer coil, 5.5 turns per inch (2.16 turns per cm.),
No. 18 monel wire. Inner coil, 4.5 turns per inch (1.77 turns per
om.), No, 18 monel wire
Flat-strip coil, 6 turns per inch (2.36 turns per om.) of copper strip
about 0.21 om. X 0.09 cm. in cross sectlon
3. Single-wire coil, 4.5 turns per inch (2.16 turns per om.), No. 18 monel wire
Double-wire coil: Outer coil, 4.5 turns per inch, No. I8 monel wire.
Inner coil, 3.5 turns per inch (1.38 turns per om.), No. 18 monel wife
Flat-strip coil, 6 turns per inch (2.36 t y s per om.) of copper strip
about 0.21 om. X 0.1 cm. in croas section
Jack chains 8 stranda No. 22 brass single jack chains
I Jack chains: 23 strand's, No. 22 brass single jack chains
Glass cylinders, 5 mm. qutside diameter X 5 mm. long glass cylinders,
walls about 1.2 mm. thick
A.
ISTICS OF
SAMPLEAND
OF
VAPORENTERING
COLUMN
FACTOR
2. TOTALTIME OF DISTILLATION
Given a particular apparatus, there will be a certain optimum total time of distillation, below which the accuracy of
separation suffers unduly and above which the increased
sharpness of separation does not justify the extra time.
The more effective the fractionating column, the shorter
will be the total time of distillation to secure the desired results. The amount of hold-up of material in the reflux or
condensing section of the column is frequently a controlling
factor as to time of distillation and the time of distillation
may be increased several times, by the use of large-diameter
condensing tubes with bulky seals or with reflux partitioning
devices, over the time which would be required with a column
designed for least practical hold-up in the reflux. With the
apparatus described in this series of papers, the time of distillation varies from as little as 1.5 hours to 5 or more hours
(averaging 3 to 4 hours for most routine determinations),
depending entirely on the nature of the sample and on the
requirements of the analysis, but including a range of sample
size from one to several thousand cubic centimeters and for
either low- or high-temperature distillations. Typical results
showing extremely sharp fractionation are given in Figures 4
to 13 of Part I11 of this series, which show far sharper
separation than the results of similar distillations in columns
several stories high (6,14) and taking as many as five days.
It will be shown in this paper that even infinite time cannot
compensate for poor rating in factors 4,5, 6, and 7.
122
in steps, in order t o
be able to control the
distillation pro per1y ,
and to f a c i l i t a t e the
recording and correction for pressure of the
temperature readings.
The second d i s t i l l a t i o n pressure may
conveniently be about
40 mm., and the third
pressure 5 mm. or
lower. For distillation pressures lower
than about 1 mm.,
packed fractional distillation columns are
not suitable because of
excessive pressure drop
and for other reasons
(24).
(d) For
precise
f r a c t i o n a t i o n it is
essential t o h a v e
precise and practically
lagless control of heat
supply to still, reflux
cooling, distillation
pressure, etc. Otherwise it will neither be
possible t o adjust the
reflux r a t i o in t h e
manner described
above nor to maintain
the column precisely a t
the desired condition of
wetness of packing.
All t h e s e o p e r a tional variables
a p p e a r complicated
and difficult to
standardize and
record. H o w e v e r ,
in p r a c t i c e , it has
been found p o s s i b 1e
6 0 to stadardize on
Operation
FIGURE
2. EXPERIMENTALLY
DETERMINED
TOTALHOLD-UP OF
LIQUID IN VARIOUS DISTILLING
TUBEAND PACKING
COMBINATIONS
S P Standard Precision distilling tubes,
dbeled A , l3, 9, H , and I in Figure, 1
R ,Figure
Regular
1 distllllng tube, labeled C In
e,
54,Semi-Regular distillingtube,labeled D
FACTOR3. REGULATION
OF DISTILLATION
RATE, REFLUX that different operain Figure 1
S, spiral distilling tube, labeled F in
RATIO,DISTILLATION
PRESSURE,
AND OTHEROPERATING tors will Secure very
Figure 1
silnilar r e s u l t s in
Subspripts: u , unpacked. s, single-wire
VARIABLES
coil. d, ,double-wire coil. f, flat-strip
coil. j , jack chains. 8 , glass cylinders
The following variables comprise the procedure of frac- practically the same
tional distillation analysis. The same column and apparatus total distillation time.
will give widely different results according to the procedure It has also been found possible to develop an automatic recordused. The following generally valid observations are made, ing and control mechanism, adapted for low-temperature frackeeping in mind the fundamental criterion of least size inter- tionation analysis, in which practically all the important operational variables as included under factor 3 are fixed by a few
mediate fractions per time of complete distillation.
simple adjustments of the apparatus.
(a) The amount of vapor entering the bottom of the columnis
of course proportional t o the heat supplied to the still. Contrary
to most accepted practice, it has been found in the present inFACTORS
4 AND 5 . RATIOOF TEN TIMESHOLD-UPOF
vestigation that best fractionation can be obtained by regulating
MATERIAL
IN FRACTIONATINQ
AND CONDENSING
SECTIONS
the heat to still and reflux cooling so that the packing of the
TO MAXIMUM
COLUMN
CAPACITY
column is barely wet (84). The reasons for this will be evident
from the discussion under factors 4 and 5.
Factors 4 and 5 are evaluated on the basis of the same set
(b) Reflux ratio should be varied according t o difficulty of
fractionation rather than maintained constant. More specifi- of experimental data. Otherwise, they are entirely distinct
cally, the reflux ratio should be inversely proportional to the and independent, and two columns may have the same rating
tangent of the fractional distillation curve; as in the case of the of the one factor and differ several hundred per cent on the
automatic recording and control mechanism for low-temperature
fractionation analysis described in Part IVZ of this series. This rating of the other. Both factors, especially factor 5 , have
procedure is far more economical of time and yields better frac- been found to be of great importance in their effect on the
tionation than maintaining the reflux ratio constant or following amount of the intermediate fraction per cent. Accordingly,
any other procedure.
a complete experimental study was made of a variety of dis( c ) Distillation pressure is preferably maintained constant at
atmospheric. When the upper limit of the reflux temperature is tilling tube and packing combinations to determine their
reached or when the still temperature approaches the temperature ratings for factors 4 and 5 .
of incipient thermal decomposition of sample, it becomes necesDESCRIPTION
OF DISTILLIKG
TUBES. Figure 1 illustrates
sary to lower distillation pressure. This should be done abruptly and gives all dimensions and details of nine distilling tubes of
varying diameter in combination with several different types
2 Part I V is t o be printed in the Analytical Edition of May 15, 1933
ANALYTICAL EDITION
122
Vol. 5 , No. 2
AND COMPUTED
DATAON HOLD-UP,MAXIMUM
DISTILLING
CAPACITY,
AND FACTORS
4 AND 5 RATINGS
TABLEI. EXPERIMENTAL
ON VARIOUS DISTILLING
TUBESAND PACKINGS (SEE FIGURE
1)
HELICAL
GLASS
CHARACTERISTIC
SINGL~-WIREDOUBLE-WIRE FLAT-STRIP JACK
CHAIN
CYLINDER
No PACKIXG COIL PACKINGCOIL PACKING PACKING
PACKINQ
PACKINQ
PROPERTIES~
a2
0.133
0.21
...
..
...
b
0.028
0.028
..
0.002
e
0.0000
0.236
d
0.161
...
e
0.020
0.020
...
0.0045
0.0045
...
f
0.0245
0,0245
, . .
..
n
0.2115
h
0.1365
...
..
...
..
i
2.75
Zero
...
..
m
0.77
...
j
..
m
k
0.089
...
a
B . Standard Precision micro0.11
0.14
...
..
...
..
b
0.038
0.038
distilling tube 3.0 mm.
..
...
..
0.002
inside diameter
0.00
..
.
.
.
..
$
0.148
0.176
.
.
.
.
.
e
0.016
0.016
..
...
0.006
0.006
...
..
f
0.022
0.022
...
...
0.154
0.126
. .
..
...
..
4.0
3.5
i
...
..
0.385
0.359
..
j
..
k
0.055
0.0629
..
C. Regular distilling tube 3.8
a
0.29
0.81
0.91
..
..
b
0.081
mm. inside diameter
0.081
0.081
...
..
e
0.000
0.006
0 0091
..
..
d
0.885
0.371
0 9ft2
..
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.176
0.176
0.176
...
0.710
0.196
0.806
...
4.36
7.01
3.14
..
...
..
1.63
2.57
0.279
..
..
0.403
0.250
0.659
*
..
D. Semi-Regular distilliflg tube
0.22
0.74
0.81
..
...
3.8 mm. inside diameter
0.079
0.079
0,079
..
...
..
C
0.006
0.009
0.00
..
d
0.813
0.299
0.880
..
e
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.028
0.028
0.028
..
f
0.103
0.103
0.103
..
0.710
0.196
0.777
..
...
4.36
7.01
3.14
..
..
1.63
0.279
2.47
..
0.237
0.147
0.328
..
E . Standard Precision distil0.17
0.63
0.72
..
...
ling tube 3.8 mm. inside
0.06
0.06
0.06
..
...
C
0.009
0.006
0.00
diameter
..
*.
0.771
0.684
d
0.23
..
..
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.009
0.009
0.0344
0.034
..
...
n
0.196
0.649
h
0.736
...
i
7.01
4.36
3.14
..
...
0.279
1.49
0.0234
..
j
...
*.
k
0.015
0.109
0.0788
..
1 a and k experimentally determined, others derived or computed.
. . . . .
2 a Total hold-up of liquid in distilling tube
q, Total liquid and vapor hold-up in condensing section, obtainea Dy
b: Total hpld-up of vapor in distilling tube
adding e to f
C. Correction for packing volume, to be subtracted from b
h, Hpld-up of liquid and vapor in fractionating section only,obtained by
d? Total liquid ana vapor hold-up in distilling tttbe, obtained by subsubtra@:ng,g from.$
tracttng c from the sum Of a and b
2, Maximum atstillinn caoacitv of distillinn tube
j Factor 4 rating , obxainkd by dividing h b y i
e, Hold-up of liquid in condensing section
k, Factor 5 rating , obtained by dividing g by i
f, Hold-up of vapor in condensing section
DESCRIPTION
OF
DISTILLINGTUBE
A . Standard Precision microdistillins tube 2.6 mm.
inside diameter
..
...
..
..
..
...
..
.. ..
...
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
...
I . .
8::
..
DESCRIPTION
OF PACKINQS.
The wire coil and flat-strip
coil packings were made of dimensions and pitch as seemed
best from previous experience. Changes in size of wire or
pitch, or in the spacing of the inner and outer coil, or both,
would of course affect the characteristics of the packing, depending on the extent of the changes. To a considerable
extent the effect of such changes can be estimated from the
experimental data.
Other packings or distortions of the glasswall of the distilling tubes were not tried. It was not intended to survey all
known packings, but merely to evaluate those which promised
best fractionation.
EXPERIMENTAL
DETERMINATION
OF HOLD-UPOF LIQUID.
The hold-up of liquid on the walls and packings was determined experimentally by carefully pouring exactly 10 cc. of
c. P. toluene from a buret into the top of the exactly vertically
aligned distilling tube, and measuring (in a 10-cc. finely
graduated buret) all the liquid drained from the bottom of
the tube after one minute of time elapsed from the pouring
of the 10 cc. From three to eight or more such tests were
made on each tube and packing combination, and the average of all readings was taken, except those obviously in error.
The draining period of one minute was chosen as it most nearly
represented the condition of wetness of column packing found
123
AND COMPUTED
DATAON HOLD-UP,MAXIMUM
DISTILLINGCAPACITY,
AND FACTORS
4 AND 5 RATINQ~
TABLEI. EXPERIMENTAL
(Continued)
ON VARIOUS
DISTILLINGTUBES
AND PACKINGS
F.
DEECRIPTION
OF
DISTILLINQ
TUBE
Spiral distilling tube 5 mm.
inside diameter, 400-cm.
distilling tnbe length
HELICAL
CHARACTERISTIC
S I N G L E - W I R ~DOUBLE-WIRE FLAT-STRIP JACKCHAIX
PACKING
P R O P E R T I E S ~No PACKING COILPACKINGCOILPACKING PACKING
...
...
aa
2.68
...
..
b
0.389
...
...
C
0.00
. .
, . .
...
..
d
3.069
...
...
..
0.170
...
0.042
...
..
...
...
0.212
...
...
..
h
2.857
...
...
...
i
7.02
...
...
,.
...
4
.
0
7
.
.
.
.
.
j
k
0.303
...
..
1.30
1.67
1.22
0.44
0.171
0.171
0.171
0.17
0.012
0,018
0.019
0.00
1.372
1.823
0.61
1.459
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.091
0.091
0.091
0.091
1.281
1.732
1.368
0.520
10.8
6.9
14.75
24.0
1.6
1.86
0.217
0.927
0.132
0.0845
0.0618
0.0380
3.40
2.23
2.13
1.77
a
0.61
0.254
0.254
0.254
0.254
b
0.254
0.040
0.021
0.029
0.014
C
0.00
3.614
2.463
2.354
2.010
0.864
@ d
0.092
0.092
0.092
0.092
e
0.092
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.035
f
0.128
0.128
0.128
0.128
0.128
0
3.486
2.227
2.335
1.883
h
0.736
14.5
8.4
26.5
21.20
i
36.3
1
.
5
3
4.15
0
.
7
1
1
.
1
0.203
j
0.152
0,088
0.0601
0.0481
k
0.0351
...
4.92
a
1.17
...
...
..
0.651
0.651
b
...
...
0.114
0.00
C
...
...
..
5.457
1.821
d
0.174
...
...
e
0.174
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
0.098
0.098
f
0.272
0.272
0
5.186
h
1.550
...
...
..
32.50
i
106.0
.
.
.
.
.
1.60
.
.
.
0.146
j
0.0835
...
...
..
k
0.0256
7.
. I
GLASS
CYLIND~R
PACKINQ
..
..
.. ..
...
. I .
I.
by actual experience to be most conducive to good fractionation. The resulting data are plotted on log paper (Figure 2)
and seem to correlate very well, considering that the different
wire-coil and flat-strip packings were not strictly similar with
respect to column diameter,
The unpacked Regular (C) and Semi-Regular (D)tubes show
much higher hold-ups than the corresponding 3.8-mm. inside
diameter Standard Precision (E) tube; and the Regular tube has
higher hold-up than the Semi-Regular. These differences can be
due only to the higher hold-up of liquid in the larger condensing
tubes of the Regular and Semi-Regular tubes, and in the triple-wall
seal of the Regular as against the Semi-Regular tube. The spiral
tube ( F ) shows a very high liquid hold-up, due in part to the
extra length (400 cm.) of the fractionating length proper as
against the length (101.6 cm.) of the other tubes; but due mostly
to the increased surface of the large condensing tube (7.8 mm.
inside diameter) and capillary action of the triple-wall glass seal.
Contrary to the statements of Davis (9) and Young (18),an inclined spiral tube holds up much more liquid (rather than less)
than a vertical tube of same uncoiled length and bore. The
single-wire coil and helical flat strip show least hold-up of all the
packings, with the double-wire coil next in order. The jack
chains show a much higher proportionate hold-up, while the
glass cylinders hold up an abnormal amount of liquid compared
with all other packings. For the unpacked tubes or for tubes
packed with practically similar packings, the liquid hold-up
seems to vary directly as the 1.6th power (approximately) of the
distilling tube diameter.
Tubes A and B show erratic behavior due to the use of wire
coils dissimilar to those used in the larger tubes and to the increasing effect of capillarity in these small diameters. Unpacked
tube A tends to fill with liquid, instead of draining smoothly.
The apparent discrepancy between the 2.6-mm. and the 3-mm.
inside diameter single-wire coil packed tubes is due primarily
to difference in the number of turns of wire per unit of length,
and can be greatly lessened by using a packing with fewer turns.
...
..
..
..
7.15
0.651
0.134
7.667
0.174
0.098
0.272
7.396
21.60
3.42
0.126
EXPERIMENTAL
DETERMINATION
OF MAXIMUM
DISTILLINQ
ANALYTICAL EDITION
124
Vol. 5, No. 2
FIGURE3. EXPERIMENTALLY
DETERMINED MAXIMUM
DISTILLING
CAPACITY
OF VARIOUSDISTILLING
TUBE AND
PACKING
COMBINATIONS
Sp, Standard Precision distilling tubes. R Regular distilling tube. SR, Bemi-Reguh distilling tube. S, spiral distillin tube.
s, single-w:e coil. d , double-wire coil. f, flat-strip C O I L i, lack chains. 0, glass cylinfers.
Subscripts: u, unpacked.
The factor of 1/225 is chosen t o convert air volume to equivalent cubic centimeters of liquid because it can be shown that
this ratio generally holds true for most liquids and their vapors a t
atmospheric boiling point temperatures, including the range of
aliphatic hydrocarbons, ethane to octane and beyond. The
objection may be raised that toluene at room temperature is not
the same thing as a particular liquid sample to be distilled; nor
is air the strict equivalent of a saturated vapor in contact with its
particular equilibrium liquid. However, the usefulness of such
a standard simple and easily reproducible test is apparent.
Actually, the discrepancies introduced by the assumptions
of this test are not great, and its findings have been well substantiated by actual distillations made with the distilling tubes
and packings tested.
The various distilling tubes and packings, already described,
were thus tested for maximum vapor capacity and the results
incorporated under i in Table I and plotted on log paper in
Figure 3. Tubes C, D, and E have about the same capacity
within the limit of experimental error, as would be expected,
although their liquid hold-ups are different. The capacities
of the single-wire coil packed tubes are nearest to those of the
unpacked tubes with double-wire coil, helical flat-strip coil,
jack chains and glass cylinders following in order.
The order of capacities is the reverse of the hold-ups in
Figure 2. The spiral tube shows an abnormally low capacity,
just as it had previously shown an abnormally high liquid
and vapor hold-up. This is, of course, due to the fact that
the liquid draining down the spiral column does not have
full gravity head and is therefore more easily entrained and
slugged upward.
On the whole, the data fall on practically straight smooth
curves, showing the substantial accuracy of the experimental
determinations. Jack chains show both materially less
125
hold-up and materially higher capacity than glass cylinders, of the sharpness of separation that may be secured at the top
even though they present a great many more liquid-vapor of the column packing for the same sample and conditions of
operation. Figure 6 serves graphically to illustrate this
aontacts and changes of path per unit column length.
Tubes A and B are again erratic, for the reasons discussed statement, which follows from theoretical considerations as
above. The capacity of the unpacked tube A is zero, signify- reviewed in Young's book (d6), and from the nature of the
ing flooding a t no capacity; whereas the introduction of a criterion of column effectiveness as defined in this paper,
fine wire spiral into the tube bestows upon it a fairly respect- namely, least intermediate fraction per cent in least total time
of distillation (without regard to sample size). For the two
able capacity, due to the draining effect of the wire.
From the experimentally determined maximum capacities columns, A and B, as shown, the composition and temperature
i t is possible to approximate the minimum time of distillation gradient are exactly the same. Both columns are assumed t o
required for a sample of a given size distilled in one of the have the same sample capacity, and hence the size of sample
tube and packing combinations tested; or conversely, to is the same for both. However, the size of the intermediate
determine the maximum size sample which can be distilled fraction as shown on the corresponding fractional distillation
in a given total time of distillation. An average reflux ratio curves above the columns is widely different-column A
of 6 to 1 may usually be assumed for routine determinations, is three times as effective as column B. It is not necessary for
yielding a sample size of 43.6 cc., for each hour of total time the general truth of this relation that the separation between
of distillation, in the case of the 3.8-mm. Standard Precision components be as sharp as indicated in the illustration.
single-wire coil packed tube; and 212 cc., for each hour of Factor 4 is not distinguished by a determination of the
total time of distillation in the case of the 7.8-mm. Standard height of equivalent theoretical plate (H. E. T. P.) as dePrecision double-wire coil packed tube. (All cc. figures given scribed by Peters (18)and Carswell (7) ; nor by any procedure
in this paper are in liquid equivalent unless otherwise stated.) for determining the effectiveness of a column which is based
Much higher average reflux ratios may, of course, be used for only on the composition and temperature gradient throughout
precise work with corresponding diminution in size of sample the column.
It is interesting to compare the relative importance of factor
per hour total time of distillation.
The maximum capacity figures are thus an index to the dis- 4 as defined and of factor 6, which expresses the scrubbing
tilling capacity of the column. However, as regards the size effectiveness of the column. It is well known from general
of the intermediate fraction per cent, the criterion of sharpness of separation used in this
FRACTIONAL DISTILLATION CURVE
paper, neither the maximum capacity figure i ,
nor the total hold-up figures, h and g, are of
5a
2
any significance. It is the relation between the
8
0
$
hold-up and maximum capacity that is both
z
a0,
significant and important.
DERIVATION
OF FACTORS
4 AND 5. From the
D
IO
20 30 40 59 SO m 80 90 100
C C - DI 3x1
C C DiSTLLLED
data thus far presented and incorporated in
Table I, it is possible to compute factors 4 and
5 as listed under j and k , respectively, in the
table. I n order t o give these factors a more
A S S U M E INSIGNIFIC
immediate physical significance, the maximum
LD UP ABOVE COLUMN
capacity was multiplied by 10 to r e p r e s e n t ,
roughly, the size sample which would be taken
for a total time of distillation of 2 or 3 hours;
TO CONDENSER
and the quotient of the hold-up figure over ten
times maximum capacity, in turn, multiplied by
100 to represent the percentage of the hold-up
in terms of the sample size as assumed.
In the case of factor 4,the percentage figure
OPERATING ON MIXED
thus obtained must be considered together with
O F EXACTLY
SAME NUMBER O F
the rating of factor 6 before any final conclusions
CH E.TP'5. IN BOTH CASES
can be made. In the case of factor 5, the percentage figure indicates the minimum obtainable
xx *xr
size of intermediate fraction regardless of all
v
*\*
other considerations. The final percentage fig*"'
LEGEND
ures for factors 4 and 5 are plotted on logarithmic
= LOWER BOiLlNG COMPONENT
>::
cross-section paper in Figures 4 and 5, respec,\
==
HIGH BOILING COMPONENT
:a*
tively.
\\\
I
:
:
:
:
:
j
=
MIXTURE COMPONENT%
<\ 1
GENERAL
DISCUSSION
OF FACTOR
4. Factor
4 i n c l u d e s b o t h the hold-up of liquid in the
fractionating section as the numerator and maximum capacity as the denominator. Its value
may therefore be decreased either by decreasing the hold-up in the fractionating section, h,
by using a low hold-up packing or maintaining
the packing barely wet in operation, or by increasing the c o l u m n c a p a c i t y , i. For two
c o 1u m n s , w h i c h are approximately equal in
scrubbing effectivenessas discussed under factor
t+ e6, their rating in terms of factor 4 is an inverse
quantitative (and approximately linear) measure
FIGURE
6. EFFECT
OF DIFFERENCE
IN FACTOR
4 RATING
LLE D
I
VAPORS
* x
-1
*bh
126
ANALYTICAL EDITION
HOLDUP
5HOWINB
A N D PACKlNd O F
TiONATINCl POWER.
Vol. 5, No. 2
127
DETERMINATION
OF FACTOR
6. Factor 6 can be determined directly and separately from factors 4 and 5 by means
of the following suggested general procedure :
A standard wash liquid is poured into the top of the column at a
constant measured rate in countercurrent relation with a suitable
standard vapor entered into the bottom of the column at a constant measured rate 225 times (by volume) greater thkn that of
the standard wash liquid rate. B analysis of the enriched wash
liquid or the stripped vapor or bod, or by determination of some
characteristic physical property such as density or refractive
index, it is possible to determine quantitatively the scrubbing
effectivenessof thQcolumn and its packing free from the effects of
hold-up.
EFFECTIVENESS
OF COLUMN
FACTOR
6. SCRUBBING
PACKINGS
COMPARISON
OF PACKIKGS.
The desirability of securing
most effective possible scrubbing action between the descending reflux liquid and the ascending heater vapor from
the still by the use of suitable column packing is well recognized. The data and discussion under factors 4 and 5 show
the advantages of packings based on perfect uniform, continuous, and geometrically symmetrical construction over
all the chance arrangement packings, including cylinders,
rings, jack chains, etc., and over the discontinuous modifications and inserts on the glass walls, as regards least liquid
hold-up and maximum capacity for least column diameter.
It is perhaps mident from inspection alone that the spiral
packings can be made t o give materially better scrubbing
action than the other packings. Actual comparison of these
packings with Lessing rings, jack chains, glass cylinders,
etc., by distillation in the same apparatus on same sample
and with same operational variables demonstrates their
superiority. The separation obtained in a single distillation
such as any of those illustrated in Figures 3 to 13 in Part I11
of this series is far better than sixteen redistillations in the
Young and Thomas Evaporator (26). Curves with such
sharp breaks for petroleum products have not been duplicated
with other packings.
The wire packing described by Dufton (12) is also spiral,
continuous, and uniform. However, its action is utterly unlike
that of the wire-coil and flat-coil packings here described, inasmuch as the large-diameter wire is merely a spiral partition rather
than a point of attachment for capillary films (factor 6 ) . The use
of glass tube or rod core is objectionable on account of difficulty
in snug fitting of parts, high heat capacity and conductivity of
the large-diameter glass tubing and of the wire, and, what is more
important, the resulting large hold-up throughout both the fractionating and refluxing length of the column (factors 4 and 5 ) .
FIGURE
8. EXPERIMENT
WITH PACKED
VACUUMTUBE
periments of this type are very useful and are recommended
in the close comparison and design of packings; and the
results when correlated with factor 4 should be completely
reliable indications of the usefulness of the packing when
incorporated in an adiabatic properly designed and operating
column. Results of such tests will be described in another
article of this series.
FACTOR
7. EFFICIENCY
OF THERMAL
INSULATION
OF
COLUMN
The importance of securing sufficient thermal insulation
in the case of small-diameter laboratory fractionating columns
has been well understood theoretically, but there has been
difficulty in securing such insulation in a practical manner.
128
ANALYTICAL EDITION
FIGURE9. EXPERIMENT
WITH REFLECTOR PARTITION
VACUUXTUBE
column. What is more serious, a t temperatures much below
room temperature uninsulated columns will completely
superheat; while a t temperatures very much above room
temperature the columns will flood unless the column diameter be made several times greater than would be necessary,
resulting in high hold-up of liquid and vapor and consequent
poor fractionation. Merely lengthening the column will
obviously not compensate for poor insulation and may make
matters worse. No matter how inherently well designed
and constructed a distilling tube and its packing may be,
its usefulness is materially
limited by p o o r t h e r m a l
insulation.
Figure 16 shows various
f o r m s of f r a c t i o n a t i n g
columns, all except Peters'
column 7 i n s u l a t e d with
vacuum j a c k e t s . These
c o l u m n s incorporate t h e
distilling tube and packing
elements as s h o w n separately in Figure l and discussed under factors 4, 5 ,
and 6. Column 7 does not
depend a t all upon avacuum
jacket or other lagging, but
u p o n t h e maintenance of
an artificial external temperature gradient adjusted
t o match closely the internal
natural temperature gradient. It has not been used
for f r a c t i o n a t i o n s below
room temperature, for the
obvious reason that refrige r a t i n g and not h e a t i n g
wire coils would have to be
used. The other columns
Vol. 5, No. 2
ARTIFICIAL EXTERNALTHERMALGRADIENTINSULATIO
The external artificial thermal gradient, although the only practical alternative to an efficient vacuum jacket, is not a precise device. Ordinarily the top and the bottom temperatures of the air
flowing through the jacket cannot be maintained closer than 3" C.
to the corresponding temperatures inside the column. It may,
therefore, be presumed that a much greater variation of internal
and external temperatures occurs in the body of the jacket.
Furthermore, there is no simple way of determining how much
the thermal gradient of the column is distorted from the gradient
it would assume if perfect insulation could be obtained. The heat
input to the jacket may be as much as 1400 watts, while the heat
input t o the still is not more than about 500 watts for a 12.5-mm.
inside diameter tube, which shows the difficulties of regulation.
The use of this type of insulation for the expected separation of
components boiling only about 10" C. or less apart seems to be
ineffective and, actually, such separation could not be accomplished in this type of column except with great difficulty.
UNSILVEREDAND STRIP-SILVEREDVACUUMJACKETS.
The strip-silvered vacuum jacket is fairly successful for lowtemperature fractionations even down to liquid air temperatures. Some difficulty is experienced in the refluxing of methane, and it was believed that if better insulation were made
possible it would result in sharper fractionation. For high-,
temperature distillations, above 100" C. and up to 300" C.
where heat transfer by radiation becomes a more important
mechanism than conduction or convection, even the stripsilvered vacuum jacket becomes inadequate and the unsilvered vacuum jacket almost completely useless. Furthermore, a t the higher temperatures the differential expansion of
the inner or distilling tube of the vacuum-jacket column,
relative to the outer cool tube, invariably results in fracture of
the glass.
The literature was, therefore, searched for information
leading to an improvement of the vacuum-jacket type
of column to make it more efficient for low-temperature
work and applicable for high-temperature work.
Dewar (11) has made some very interesting experiments on
filling the vacuum space between the walls of LL vacuum container
with various finely divided insulating powders, also with partitions of papers plated with tin, silver, and gold, and observing the
CHEMISTRY
OF THERMAL
INSULATION
EFFECTIVENESS
OF VACUUMCONTAINERS^
TABLE11. COMPARISON
VAPORIZE
EQUALQUANTITIESOF LIQUIDNITROGEN
DEBCRIPTION
129
ZN
TERMSOF TIMEREQUIRED
TO
TIMECORRECTIJD
FOR INEQUALITY
I N AMOUNTS
OF
INSULATING
CAPACITYb UP TO
LIQUIDAIR
EFFECTIVENESS
BOTTON
OF NECK ACTUAL
TIME
VAPORIZED (No. 2 = loo%!
CC *
Min.
Min.
%
262.0
2640
266.6
3975
273.3
3856
2935
272.1
260.4
4625
4688
120
130
ANALYTICAL EDITION
Vol. 5, No. 2
UNSILVERED
JTRlP SILVERED
H O L i S IN LINE
COMPLETELY SILVERED
I1
hOLES O ' J T O F I I N E .
OF COLUMN SURROUNDINGS
IIO.VAC
MILLIVOLTMETER
FIGURE
11. DIAGRAM
OF EXPERIMENTAL
APPARATUS
FOR TESTING
VACUUM JACKETS
AXD
OTHER
1.
Plain air jacket composed of inner Pyrex tube, 9 mm. inside diameter and of outer Pyrex tube about 36 mm. outside diamet.er, spaced a t ends with
corks, as shown
Same a s 1, but with mineral wool loosely packed into annula: space between inner and outer tubes
Same as 1 in dimensions of inner and outer tubes, but provided with glass tube partition as shown, the whole interior including partition silvered
3.
completely except for clear strip 0.26 inch (0.63 om.) wide, extending lengthwise of entire tube; ends of this tube sealed in ring seals as shown a n d
tube provided with tubulature and connections t o high-vacuum pump
Sleeve-ty
e jacket for fractionating column, inside diameter about 9 mm., outside diameter of outer tuber about,35 mm., interior evacuated but not
4.
silveref
Same as 4, but interior silvered completely except for clear strip about 0.26 in. wide (0.63 om.) extending lengthwise of entire tube
6.
6.
Same a s 4 but interior completely silvered
Same a s d, b u t provided with special nickel-chromium iron alloy reflector tube, highly polished, 0.55 in. (1.44 om.) diameter, 0.004in. (0.01 om.)
7.
thickness walls. erforated for visibility as shown, perforations 0.25 in. (0.63 om.) diameter; occur in sets of 4 on 0.376 in. (0.95 om.) centers,
1.75 in. (4.44crkfspaoe between sets, holes matching diametrically on both sides of tubes. Total number of holes, 104
8. Same as 7, b u t copper-plated inside and outside
9.
Same R.R 7. b u t silvered ont,side onlv
IO.
Same
7 ; but si1ve;ed bothinsidFand outside
11.
Same a s 7 but reflector not perforated; silver-plated inside and outside
Same as 7: but reflector not perforated: silver-plated inside and outside. Glass walls silvered on all interior surfaces
12.
13. Same as 7. b u t reflector silver-plated inside and outside; provided with additional concentric 0.875 in. (2.22 om.) diameter reflector, perforated t o
match holes with inner reflector and silver-glated inside and outside
13A. Same a s 13, but with 80 perforations and very highly polished,
14. Same as 13, b u t reflectors turned so that perforatlons are not in line
16.
Similar to 13 and 14, except that reflectors are not perforated
2.
were needed to establish equilibrium in the rate of heat leakage and internal temperatures. Description and details of
the testing apparatus are given in Figure 11 which is drafted
so as to be practically self-explanatory.
A curve of test data is given in Figure 11 for column 5.
It will be noted that the temperatures drop off considerably
towards the ends of the column, because of conduction along
both the metal of the reflector and of the glass in the inner
tube of the column. However, the metal reflector tube was
sufficiently thin and constructed of very low heat-conductivity
131
FIGURE
13. RESULTS
OF EXPERIMENTS
ON EFFICIENCY
OF COLUMN
INSULATIONS.
JACKETS
3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, AND
14, FIGURE
11
3. Glass partition strip silvered
4. Evacuated unsilvered
7. Unplated perforated nickel-chromium reflector
8. Reflector perforated and copper-plated
9. Reflector perforated and silver-plated outside only
10. Reflector perforated and silver-plated
both sides
14. Double perforatedreflector, holes out of line
PL
!L
61
4:
fL
fig
28
28
d*
52
g;
Ps
FZ
0-z
;
3
FIGURE
12. RESULTS
OF EXPERIMENTS
ON EFFICIENCY
OF CGlLUMR INSULATIONS.
JACKETS
1, 2, 5 , 13, AND 13A,
FIGURE
11
Plain, air ,jacket, inner tube 9 mm.
inside diameter, outer tube 38 mm
outside diameter
Same jacket as shown in 1, but annular
2.
space of tube filled with mineral wool
insulation
Vacuum jacket silvered solid, except
5.
for 0.188 to 0.25 in. (0.45-0.63 cm.)
clear strip running lengthwise on
both sides for visibility
13.
Double reflector jacket, suitably perforated for visibility
13A. Same type vacuum jacket as 13, but
of improved construction
1.
ANALYTICAL
132
EDITION
Vol. 5, No. 2
APPLICATION
OF RESULTSTO LOW-TEMPERATURE
FRAC- experimented with, including a bubble column in which an
From the above conclusions it appears that elastic corrugated glass bellows absorbed the differential exeither a single or double silver-plated perforated reflector-type pansion, and a metal-glass column in which a metal bellows
vacuum jacket presents a material improvement over a strip- was sealed to form a section of the inner or outer tube of the
silvered vacuum jacket. From actual tests it was found jacket. The only practical and entirely satisfactory conthat a single metal reflector jacket considerably improved struction was found to be one wherein the inner tube was
the performance of low-temperature fractionating columns as made of transparent fused quartz, while the rest of the jacket
was made of Pyrex. The quartz tube is attached to the Pyrex
through specially well made graded joints. Fused quartz is
known to have a negligible thermal expansion coefficient,
while the Pyrex exterior of the column is not exposed to high
2'
temperatures and, therefore, the expansion of both the inner
and outer tubes of the jacket is negligible. The practically
Pt
:r
complete elimination of deflection and of the resulting
gy,s
r.2
strains or breakage is shown graphically in Figure 15. The
Pyrex vacuum-jacket columns shown by Leslie (I?'), Cooper
(8), and Bush and Schwartz (6) could not possibly have
survived to temperatures much higher than about 100" C.
I 0s
unless the heat insulation of the jacket was so poor that the
temperature of the outer wall was not greatly different from
DIFFERENCE
TEMPERATURE X B E T W E L N INTERIOR
COLUMN
the temperature of the inner wall.
FIGURE
14. RESULTS
OF EXPERIMENTS
Fused quartz, in addition to its negligible thermal exON EFFICIENCY
OF COLUMNINSULApansion coefficient, has a very high melting point (above
TIONS.JACKETS
6 , 11, 12, AND 15,
1600" C.) and is much more resistant to deterioration a t high
FIGURE11
temperatures than Pyrex or plain glass. It is therefore
6. Silvered on glass walls no reflector
11. Single nonperforated ' reflector, silverespecially suitable for use in a high-temperature distilling
plated
column. Since it does not deteriorate a t any temperatures
12. Single nonperforated + l e c t o r , silverplated; glass walls silvered
within the recommended range, it does not give off sufficient
15. Double nonperforated reflector, silverplated
gas to spoil the vacuum.
The most thorough precautions have to be taken for proper
regards ease of entering high methane percentage samples, evacuation of such high-temperature columns, including
refluxing methane, and obtaining sharpest possible breaks. thorough degasification of the vitreous and metal parts (using
From considerations of the greater cost of the double reflector high-frequency high-voltage bombardment methods for the
construction, it was concluded that far low-temperature work metal parts) and the use of very efficient getters to maintain
the single reflector jacket furnished substantially perfect in- the original high vacuum (better than 0.00001 mm.) throughsulation together with sufficient visibility. Extensive ex- out a reasonably long operating life. Sufficient tests of such
oerience in manv laboratories with these. perforated
reflector-type vacuum jackets substantiates their ma- ;;z;;;;;o:~",",
EXPANSION
terial superiority over the strip-silvered jackets.
APPLICATION
OF RESULTS
TO HIGH-TEMPERATURE
FRACTIONATIONS.
For distillations a t temperatures
z17MM
a b o v e a b o u t 150" or 200" C., the loss of heat by
radiation from even the single perforated reflector0
type vacuum jacket is appreciable; and the use of a
UIMK
double Derforated reflector becomes desirable. BYthe
use of ;he separate sleeve-type vacuum-jacket -construction, it also becomes possible to insert a minia0
415HM
ture fine resistance wire h e a t e r into the a n n u l a r
clearance space between outside of d i s t i l l i n g tube
EXPANSION
OF VACUUX-JACKET
COLUMNS
15. DIFFERENTIAL
DroDer and the inner tube of the vacuum iacket. FIGURE
AT HIGHER
TEMPERATURES
H e i t may then be s u p p l i e d t o t h i s h e a t e r i n
sufficient quantity to c o m p e n s a t e exactly for the
residual heat loss through the perforations and through the columns have been made to prove that a high vacuum can be
reflector walls. A suitable column assembly is described below. maintained indefinitely if the maximum operating interior
temperature of about 350" C. is not exceeded. The dependaEXPERIMENTS
TO PROVIDE
DIFFERENTIAL
EXPANSION
OF
VACUUMJACKETS.
At this point in the investigation it bility of the quartz-Pyrex construction is of a high order,
became necessary to make some provision for the differential and breakages have practically not been experienced, even
thermal expansion effect of the inner and outer tubes of the though the column was allowed to overheat to inside temperafractionating column already commented upon, which, at tures as high as 500" C.
higher temperatures, invariably led to fracture through progressive bowing of the weaker inner tube. It is surprising
FACTOR
8. GENERALDESIGNAND CONSTRUCTION
OF
how an apparently inappreciable elongation produces an
FRACTIONATING
COLUMN
ASSEMBLY
AND APPARATUS
inordinately large deflection. This is illustrated in Figure
The importance of this factor is paramount in that the
15 based on computation from thermal expansion coefficients
and actual experimentation. As a matter of fact, neither design of the fractionating apparatus fixes factors 4,5, 6,and
soft glass nor an all-Pyrex column or vacuum jacket will 7. Conversely, the design of the apparatus is quite definitely
survive the temperature difference of 300" C. as shown in the outlined in its essentials by the requirement of highest (or
lowest) ratings of these factors with due regard to their relafigure.
In a search to conquer this difficulty, various devices were tive importance. All four factors mentioned apply to the fracTIONATIONS.
Y O
IN
d: SURROYNDINOS
tionating c ol u m n
alone. However,
t h e accessory a p paratus for supplying heat t o still,
cooling to reflux, indicating or recording reflux temperature and amount of
distillate, pressure
control, etc., as discussed under factor
3, must be designed
to correspond to the
functioning characteristics and requirements of the fractionating c o l u m n
used. T h e sensitivity and accuracy
inherent in the fract i o n a t i n g column
will be lost unless
the accessory apparatus is so designed
as to take advantage
of them.
The general design and operation
of low-temperature
fractionating apparatus are described
in the first article of
this series (I@,
and in Part IV, to
follow. The high-
133
FIGURE
16. COMPARISON
OF INSULATED
CoLuivxs 1 TO 7
134
ANALYTICAL EDITION
Vol. 5, No. 2
w w
OPTIONAL DISTILLING
FL4SK IXSIGNS
FIGURE
17. STANDARD
PRECISION
FRACTIONATING
COLUMNS
8.
9.
vacuum jacket may be used with a variety of interchangeable contraction; whereas the high-temperature column necesseparate distilling tubes and flasks. The vacuum-jacket con- sarily includes a quartz inner tube (with rest of jacket of
struction includes only smooth seals, while the distilling tube Pyrex) to withstand its extreme temperature range. The
is completely free from bulky seals or other discontinuities. high-temperature jacket accommodates larger distilling tubes
The distilling tubes are similar to tubes A , B, E , G, and H as than the low-temperature, inasmuch as larger samples are
described under Figure 1, and range from 2.6 mm. to about more frequently required in high-temperature work than in
4.5 mm. in the case of the low-temperature column and from low-temperature analysis.
2.6 mm. to 8.0 mm. in the case of the particular high-tempera* The dry reflux cooling arrangement illustrated in Figure 17
ture column illustrated in Figure 17. A larger high-tempera- has been found entirely satisfactory and unqualifiedly superior
ture column has also been developed to accommodate dis- to any type of gasoline or other liquid bath, because of its
tilling tubes from 8.0 mm. or less up to about 15 mm. inside low heat capacity, superior heat transfer, inappreciable time
diameter and will be described in detail in a later paper of this lag in response to cooling, versatility, and complete freedom
series. The packings used are the single-wire coil up to about from tendency of liquid to freeze or to explode, over the tem6 mm. inside diameter and a double-wire coil, a flat-strip coil, perature range from the boiling point of liquid air to about
or other spiral continuous type of packing up to the largest 300" C. The low-temperature cooling vessel is provided with
siaes.
a soldered-on cap and packing gland to exclude atmospheric
In many cases, it is advisable to subject a highly complex moisture which might otherwise condense and freeze in the
sample or one with only a very small percentage of the com- reflux chamber. The high-temperature cooling vessel is
ponent to be separated or determined analytically, to a similar in general construction but has no cap and is brazed
preliminary fractionation in a large-capacity column and to to withstand the higher temperatures. The arrangement of
complete the fractionation in a smaller-capacity column. optional direct contact and indirect cooling conduits has alWith the separate vacuum-jacket distilling tube combination, ready been described (19).
it is only necessary to change distilling tubes t o secure the
The high-temperature cooling vessel may be used alternadesired large or small capacity, while this paper presents the tively with liquid air, liquid carbon dioxide, brine, water, or
essential data on sharpness of separation and capacities which compressed air as refrigerant. The heat capacity of this
may be secured with straight vertical tubes, packed with any type of cooling vessel can be made less than that possible
of the packings tested.
with any practicable type of gasoline or liquid bath.
DIFFERENCES
OF Low- AKD HIGH-TEMPERATURE
COLUMNS.
Fenske, Quiggle, and Tongberg (14) describe very tall metal
While basically similar, the low- and high-temperature columns
8 and 9 differ in many important respects in accommodation fractionating columns, which, by all the criteria set forth in this
of articles and by inspection of the actual analytical data
to their respective temperature and sample size ranges. The series
presented, are far superior to all other precise fractionating
low-temperature column has only a single perforated reflector columns described in the literature (with the exception of the
in the vacuum space of the vacuum jacket, whereas the high- preferred vacuum-jacket columns described in this paper).
temperature column has a double reflector plus a compensa- These columns are intended for research work on Pennsylvania
petroleums. The smaller column is of especial interest. It is
tory miniature resistance wire heater inside the jacket inner made
of (1.9-cm.) 0.75-inch inside diameter brass pipe 52 ft.
tube. The low-temperature column depends on initial bow- (15.84 meters) long lagged with thick layers of 85 per cent
ing of the Pyrex inner tube to compensate for differential magnesia, and also provided with sectional electric resistance wire
135
heaters, controlled by the use of differential thermocouples. give extremely precise separation of close boiling components
This method of thermal insulation seems t o be the logical one as illustrated in Figures 4 to 13 in Part 111.
for metal columns of great height, and the column deserves a
very good rating in factor 7. The importance of minimizing
hold-up of liquid and vapor in the column, and especially in the
LITERATURE
CITED
condensing section as discussed under factors 4 and 5 , seems to be
fully appreciated and the column designed accordingly. Reflux
(1) Banneitz e t al., Ann. Physik, 61, Part IV, 113-44 (1920).
temperatures are measured with a fine wire thermocouple and a
(2) Bock, German Patent 225,462 (May, 1908).
potentiometer as with the present apparatus. The wire helices
(3) Bruun, J. H., IND.
ENG.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 1, 212 (1929).
described are equivalent to sections of the wire coil packing as
(4) Ibid., 2, 187 (1930).
described by the author (19) and should be superior t o jack
(5) Bruun, J. H., and Schicktanz, S. T., Bur. Standards, Research
chains and Lessing rings, although not as efficient as a truly
Paper 379 (1931).
continuous helical packing. Actually, the separations secured
(6) Bush and Schwarta, IND.
ENG.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 4, 142 (1932).
for definite total distillation times and reflux ratios are much
(7) Carswell, IND.
ENG.CHEM.,18,294 (1926).
superior to those obtained in the other equipment reviewed.
(8) Cooper and Fasce, Ibid., 20, 420 (1928).
The substantial agreement of Fenske and his associates with
Anal. Ed., 1, 61 (1929).
(9) Davis, IND.ENQ. CHEM..,
the author, as regards the fundamentals of highly effective (10) Dept. Sci. Ind. Research (Brit.), Rept. Oxygen Research Comfractionating column design, is very gratifying. However, the
mittee, 1923.
Standard Precision high-temperature fractionating columns (11) Dewar, Proc. Roy. I n s t . Gt. Brit., 15, 823-5 (1898).
(Figure 17) are believed t o be more highly developed in thermal (12) Dufton, S. F., J. SOC.Chem. Ind., 38,45T (1919).
insulation and especially in the helical continuous type of packing (13) Fahnestock, U. S. Patent 1,315,624 (Sept., 1919).
used. The fractional distillation curves shown in Figures 3 t o (14) Fenske, Quiggle, and Tongberg, IRD.ENG. CHEW, 24, 408
13, Part 111, are superior to those presented by Fenske and as(1932).
sociates although the latter used a tall column as described and (15) Fitoh, Natl. Petroleum News, 23, No. 2 5 , 66 (1931).
as much as 6 days per distillation.
(16) Hill and Ferris, IND.
ENG.CHEM.,19,379 (1927).
(17) Leslie, E. H., Motor Fuels, Chapter 15, Chemical Catalog,
1923.
(18) Peters, IND.
ERG. CHEM.,14,476 (1922).
(19) Podbielniak, IND.ENG.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 3, 181 (1931).
(20) Podbielniak, Oil Gas J.,29, No. 20, 235 (1930).
(21) Rosen, IXD.
ENG.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 3,284 (1931).
(22) Smoluchowski, German Patent 268,490 (Feb., 1911).
(23) Washburn, E. W., Bruun, J. H., and Hicks, M, M., Bureau of
Standards, Res. Paper 45 (1929).
(24) I b i d . Part 5.
(25j Wiener, O., Bar. Verhandl. sacks. Ges. Wiss. Leipoig. Math.phus. Klasse, 70 S, 13 (1918).
(26) Young, Sydney, Distillation Principles and Processes, Macmillan, 1922.
(27) Ibid., Chap. 4.
(28) Ibid., p. 131.
The vacuum-jacket and distilling tube combinations presented in Figure 17 represent the final development of this
investigation. Essentially the same type of column, with only
such structural modifications as the double vs. single reflector and the use of quartz-Pyrex construction for higher
temperatures, gives a t the same time the most precise fractionation and the most practical results that have yet been
described in the literature over the enormous reflux temperature range of -190 C. (this temperature is based on the use
of liquid air, but can be lowered if lower-boiling refrigerants
can be obtained) up to 300 C. By the use of vacuum distillation, hydrocarbons with boiling points as high as 500 c.
can be distilled. Either gaseous or liquid samples ranging
from about 0.3 cc. (liquid equivalent) when using the micro
2.6-mm. tube, up to 20,000 cc. in si5e when using a 15-mm.
tube, can be expeditiously distilled in not very many hours to
*
RECEIVED
September 15, 1932. Presented before the Division of Petroleum
Chemistry at the 84th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Denver,
Colo., August 22 t o 26, 1932.
4
precision and convenience than the usual apparatus. Distillations may be made i n only a few
hours, showing materially better separation of closeboiling components than those made in other apparatus previously described in the literature. One
apparatus with only a change of distilling tubes
within a sleeve-type vacuum jacket may be used
f o r distillation of liquid samples ranging from a
few to 3000 cc. in size (20,000 cc. or more with
a slightly modified apparatus of Ihe same general
design).
discussed in Part I1 and possesses many new features not
previously described in connection with laboratory fractionating apparatus.
The general appearance of the complete apparatus is
shown in Figure 1. It is designed compactly and for greatest
ease and convenience in operation. All rheostat control
knobs and switches are mounted on a single switchboard
panel. Reflux cooling is regulated by turning a fine needle
valve controlling compressed air supply. For reflux temperature measurement a portable millivoltmeter or potentiometer
136
A N A 1, Y T I C A L E D I T I O N
is used, conveniently disposed on the apparatus table. Distillate volumes are read from long, finely graduated burets
located a t eye level, instead of the usual short graduates.
Changing of distillate-receiving burets during either atmospheric or vacuum distillation is accomplished by merely
shifting the receiver change-block slide. I n vacuum dis-
FIGURE1. STANDARD
PRECISION
HIGH-TEMPERATURE FRACTIONATING
APPARATUS
tillation it is necessary to set the vacuum control for the desired pressure as described and no further attention is thereafter needed.
FRACTIONATING
COLUMN
ASSEMBLY
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the Standard Precision hightemperature fractionating column assembly incorporated
in the complete fractionating unit. The vacuum jacket is
11 mm. minimum inside diameter and will accommodate
distilling tubes ranging from 2.6 to 8 mm. inside diameter,
corresponding to convenient sample sizes of about 5 to 3000
eo., respectively. Although a small amount of air at atmospheric pressure is present in the annular clearance between the outside wall of the distilling tube and the inside
wall of the vacuum jacket, this has no appreciable effect on
either the efficiency of the insulation or the thermal gradient
in the distilling tube (6). (A somewhat modified vacuum
jacket of the same general type but designed to accommodate
tubes as large as 16 mm. inside diameter, of about 20,000 cc.
convenient sample capacity, will be described in a later paper.)
The distilling flask varies from 50 to 3000 cc. in capacity
and is provided with a t least a single outlet and a thermometer
well. The joint between distilling flask and tube is made by
means of a high-grade very well fitted cork, sealed with LePages glue. Ground-glass joints have not been found satisfactory for high-temperature work. The still heater is
preferably of the radiant type such as the Cenco Hotcone
heater, and is regulated by a rheostat as shown.
Vol. 5 , No. 2
MEASUREMENT
OF REFLUXTEMPERATURE
I n order to utilize fully the sharp fractionation characteristics of the Standard Precision type columns, the reflux temperature must be measured with high accuracy, especially
in the higher boiling point ranges. The use of a thermometer
in precise fractional distillations is highly unsatisfactory (1)
because of errors due to conduction of heat along stem, radiation and stem exposure, short range, and, what is very important, bulkiness leading to undesirable high hold-up of
liquid (6).
The present apparatus therefore includes a single-junction
fine-wire thermocouple (preferably iron-constantan on account of its more uniform and reproducible e. m. f. curve)
and e. m. f. indicator, the latter being either a high-grade
millivoltmeter (such as the Engelhard portable millivoltmeter)
or a portable potentiometer instrument (such as the Brown
portable potentiometer). A millivoltmeter has the advantage of direct reading; however, a sensitive potentiometer is
preferred in the case of distilling higher molecular weight compounds of very close boiling points, where the exact determination of reflux temperatures is very important.
The direct determination of reflux temperature has been
generally criticized by Bruun (1) in favor of using the Cottrell
boiling point apparatus. However, the latter introduces a
hold-up of distillate which would completely destroy the
sharpness of separation obtainable with the fractionating
equipment as described in this article. The reentrant
thermocouple well, thermocouple and potentiometer system
of direct reflux temperature measurement (Figure 2) were
tested against (1) boiling points of a variety of pure liquids
such as carbon bisulfide, ether, acetone, benzene, toluene,
aniline, nitrobenzene, etc., actually distilled in the column,
and (2) various synthetic mixtures of these chemicals to cover
large boiling point ranges. The distillation rate and reflux
ratio were varied during these tests without appreciable
effect on the thermocouple readings until a distillation rate
as low as about 0.4 cc. per minute was reached. (In a closed
air-free system as used in low-temperature fractionations
(6), correct temperature readings are secured even with zero
distillate rate.) Below this rate the reflux temperature
readings began to fall off. Inasmuch as this low rate is exceedingly low, it must be concluded that the present reflux
temperature measuring system gives highly reliable and
accurate indications of the true boiling point of the very
small portion of the distillate passing the thermocouple.
However, the use of a well-insulated reflux chamber and of
continuods or semi-continuous rather than violent occasional
cooling is essential in order to obtain the above results.
COLLECTION
AND MEASUREMENT
OB DISTILLATE
137
5 COLLECTINU
DISPLACED
FIGURE2. DIAGRAM
OF STANDARD
PRECISION
HIGH-TEMPERATURE
FRACTIONATING
APPARATUS
A ground metal slide carries two metal nipples onto which are
connected, through rubber tubing, the correspondingly shaped
~ { ~ ~
~ ~~$ l~ ~~ *~
et h ~ l~
? ~ t p$
~ ~ ~~
e f $ m~
~ i $~
buret B under metal stopcock R and simultaneously moving buret
A under the delivery tube 0 to receive distillate. Buret A should
2-g:
ANALYTICAL EDITION
138
Vol. 5 , No. 2
BOILING
POINT
OF. C.
tube is provided t o deliver continuously (and visibly) to the distillate receiving buret any condensate returned to the block by
the vapor condensing trap. The slide is, of course, very well
ground and lapped into the body of the change block and must be
greased with a suitable lubricant to prevent leakage at even very
low pressures. Bruun ( 1 ) mentions lubricants which are especially suitable for distillation of aliphatic hydrocarbons.
However,fairly good results may be obtained with ordinary heavy
oil or glycerol.
COLLECTION,
MEASUREMENT,
AKD ANALYSISOF NONVAPORS. The use of the vapor-condensing
trap will not of course suffice to retain in the distillate air as
originally present in the distilling system or permanent gases
with boiling points more than about 10" or 15' C. below room
temperature. Accordingly, an external 3000-cc. gas-collecting flask is used for collection and measurement of the airvapor mixture leaving the vapor-condensing trap. It is of
special usefulness in the very first part of atmospheric distillations, when all the air in the distilling system is expelled
together with a certain amount of gases from the sample,
and when it is required to correct for the gases thus escaping
condensation.
When the volume of noncondensable vapors liberated from
the sample is very large, as in the case of natural gasoline or
high-gravity crude oil, it may be necessary to replace the
3000-cc, flask with a calibrated 3-gallon (11.3liter) or 5-gallon
(18.9-liter) bottle or even a wet test meter. The reflux may
be cooled with liquid carbon dioxide or even with liquid air
to secure any desired degree of separation of the more volatile
from the less volatile hydrocarbons. In this way, samples
containing components with boiling points ranging all the
way from that of methane (-161.4' C.) up to those of
lubricating oil fractions (500" C. and higher as corrected from
results of vacuum distillation) may be distilled completely,
without distillation loss.
CONDENSABLE
FIGURE
3. DIAGRAM
ILLUSTRATINQ
SCOPEOF PRECISE
FRACTIONATION
139
many objections. To overcome these objections, a vacuumcontrol apparatus, based on the null-point principle as used in
temperature-recording potentiometers, has been developed
(Figure 2).
In preparing for vacuum distillation, the standard pressure
reservoir is evacuated with the vacuum pump until its pressure
as indicated either on the long open-arm manometer or on the
McLeod gage is exactly equal t o the desired distillation pressure.
The standard pressure reservoir and the McLeod gage are then shut
off from the rest of the system by closing the intervening stopcocks. The distilling column system is evacuated approximately
to the desired distillation pressure as indicated on the open-arm
manometer, at which stage the sto cock nearest the receiver
change block is turned to connect t i e distilling system to the
right arm of the differential manometer. Whenever the distillation pressure exceeds the pressure in the standard pressure reservoir, electrical contact is made by the mercury on the left side of
the manometer, a low-voltage circuit, including a large-capacity
condenser and a relay, is completed, and the relay in turn actuates
the vacuum pump. The distillation pressure is lowered by the
FIGURE
4. LOW-TEMPERATURE
DISTILLATION
OF NATURAL action of the vacuum pump until it becomes equal to the desired
GAS
pressure, when the electrical contact in the differential manometer
1s broken until the next minute increase in distillation pressure.
The noncondensable gases liberated during distillation and In this way the distillation pressure is maintained constant to
collected in either the 3000-cc. special flask or in the larger- less than 0.1 mm. of mercury. Any leak in the standard pressure
reservoir would be indicated immediately on the McLeod gage
capacity bottles may be analyzed either by the conventional which
is connected to it at all times. The make-and-break elecabsorption and slow combustion tests or by the low-tempera- tric contact occurs on the air side of the differential manometer
and there can never be any risk of ignitture fractional -d i s t i 11a t i o n analysis
ing explosive vapors resuiting from-disa p p a r a t u s and method described in
t i l l a t i o n . The bore of the differential
Parts I (5) and IV of this series. By
manometer is made over 9 mm. to avoid
this procedure, using the two precise
sticking of mercury, as recommended by
Weaver and Ledig (IO). The whole appafractionating apparatus developed by
ratus can be drained of mercury at any
the author for low- and high-temperatime, cleaned, and refilled with medium
ture distillation range, it is possible to
pure mercury, in a very simple manner.
secure practically complete fractionation
Any dependable vacuum pump which
of any distillable mixture of even the
will p'roduce t h e d e s i r e d degree of
most extreme boiling point range by a
vaccum may be used, a l t h o u g h the
relatively s i m p l e and highly accurate
Cenco H y v a c p u m p h w been found
procedure. Figure 5 i l l u s t r a t e s the
e s p e c i a l l y suitable. In the case of
complete distillation of a typical motor
laboratories which have a line affording
fuel by this combined procedure.
a sufficient vacuum, the vacuum pump
may be replaced by a compact electroVACUUM
CONTROL
magnet valve.
I n a s m u c h a s a l m o s t a l l organic
By the use of vacuum distillation,
liquid mixtures begin t o d e c om p o s e
c o m p o n e n t s of boiling points up to
FIGURE5 . COMBINEDLow- AND
thermally a t prolonged heating above
about 500" C. may be f r a c t i o n a l l y
HIGH-TEMPERATURE
DISTILLATION
OF
about 350" C., it is i n a d v i s a b l e to
TYPICALMOTORFUEL
distilled. Usually, a t m o s p h e r i c disp e r m i t the temperature in the distiltillation is followed by d i s t i l l a t i o n a t
ling flask to go higher than that, especially since higher 40 mm. absolute as used by Dean et al. ( d ) , followed by a distemperatures might tend to deteriorate the vacuum in the tillation a t 5 or 2 mm. absolute if required. Naturally, a t
vacuum jacket through liberation of adsorbed or chemically these low pressures the capacity of the distilling tube decombined gases from interior glass walls. However, a tem- creases considerably, and a proportionately larger diameter
perature of 350" C. in the still usually corresponds to about
300" C. in the reflux. I n order, therefore, to distil components of higher boiling point than about 300" C., the distillation must be conducted a t lower than atmospheric pressures.
The usual closed-arm manometer type of vacuum-control
apparatus as described by Dean (8)and others is open to
FIGURE
6. DUPLICATE
DISTILLATIONS
OF COMMERCIAL LACQUER
THINNER
FIGURE
7 . DISTILLATION
OF AROMATIC
CONDENSATE FROM CRACKED
NATURAL
GAS
ANALYTICAL EDITION
140
$
b
DISTTILIATE IN CG
FIGURE8. DISTILLATION
OF SYNTHETIC
MIXTURE
distilling tube is used for vacuum than for atmospheric distillations. Correction of boiling points to atmospheric
is made by the use of a simple semi-logarithmic plot of vapor
pressures of the principal hydrocarbons or other compounds
being distilled (7).
The vacuum-control a s s e m b l y
and method of boiling point correction have been found highly satisf a c t o r y in e v e r y way. Curves
shown in Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12
were run using this vacuum control
device and c o r r e c t i n g the reflux
temperatures to atmospheric. The
curves are practically continuous,
showing the precision of both the
fractionating column and means of
reflux m e a s u r e m e n t , a n d t h e
vacuum-control m e c h a n i s m and
boiling point correction.
Vol. 5 , No. 2
this would mean that either too much heat is applied at the
still or the distilling tube is too small in diameter for the attempted distillate rate at the particular distillation pressure
used.
The time of distillation will of course vary greatly, depending on the size and nature of the sample distilling tube used,
distillation range, accuracy desired, etc., and will range from
one hour to several hours. The size of sample may range
from 5 cc. of liquid, using the 2.6-mm. inside dianieter distilling tube, to as much as 3000 cc. or more using the 8-mm.
inside diameter tube. Similar apparatus but of larger
capacities up to 20,000 cc. will be described in a later paper of
this series. Part I1 (8) gives complete data on distilling
capacities of tubes of these and intermediate diameters. The
range of distillation is from -190' to 300' C. reflux temperature and from atmospheric down to a few millimeters of
mercury absolute distillation pressure. Distillation a t pressures below 1 mm. of mercury is not usually practicable because of the limitations of any packed fractionating column
for such low pressures.
ANALYTICAL
PROCEDURE
Distillation with the apparatus
KC-consists essentially of regulating the
supply of heat to still and reflux to
cooling to obtain sharpest possible
DISTILLA7XWAATNOSBiifKlC ~
fractionation of sample within the
I
BC
time available and of r e c o r d i n g
and plotting frequent simultaneous
readings of reflux temperature and
amount of distillate to be used in
plotting the fractional distillation curve.
Contrary to most accepted practice, the column is regulated
so that the packing is barely wet (6). The reflux ratio (as
determined by a comparison of number of drops falling from
the bottom end of the distilling tube and from the end of
the distillate delivery tube, respectively) is varied as the apparent difficulty of separation, The distillation rate is not allowed to decrease below about 0.4 cc. per minute, as otherwise the reflux temperatures would not be representative.
Because of the efficiency of the fractionating column, it is
not usually necessary to use average reflux ratios (averaged
over the total time of distillation) much higher than about 6
t o 1 in order to obtain sharp fractionation.
The distillate delivery tube heater is used a t temperatures
above about 150" C. and for low distillation rates in order to
prevent backward diffusion of air to the thermocouple. The
jacket heater need not be used until a temperature of about
200" C. is reached in the reflux when it is gradually cut in,
using the regulating rheostat, to offset the tendency of the
column to flood due to heat leakage. Flooding due to heat
leakage usually manifests itself a t the bottom of the column
packing. If, however, the column tends to flood at the top,
E 745MM)
t e m p e r a t u r e fractionacdistillation
analysis is indicated by the heavy brackets composed of dark triangles. The apices of the triangles are 10' C. (18' F.) apart to
8 Hydrocarbons &resented
on the scale as having boiling points considerably above 300' C. (572' F.) are subject t o decomposition upon prolonged exposure to temperatures above 300 C., and it haa therefore been
FIGURE10.
I
I
II
I
IW
i%XUiT%TLLED%Y
UoW&UMf\
so
DISTILLATION
OF STRIPPEDABSORPTION
OIL
FIGURE
11. DISTILLATIONOF SETTLINGSFROM
CRUDEPETROLEUM
STORAGE
TANK
141
FIGURE
13. VACUUMDISTILLATION
OF LUBRICATING
OIL
NRVTN
for a sample of commercial kerosene, shows a wealth of welldefined plateaus, which have been found to recur consistently a t
necessary to obtain their standard boiling points by converting from boiling
points taken a t low pressures, through the use of suitable boiling point
correction charts. Such corrected boiling points are by no means fictional,
as it is well known that even very high molecular weight hydrocarbons can
be heated without decomposition to temperatures normally resulting in
extensive decomposition, provided the time of exposure to the high temperatureris made sufficiently small.
ANALYTICAL EDITION
142
APPLICATIONSOF APPARATUS
The apparatus described in this paper is believed suitable
for both research and routine industrial analytical work. Its
high fractionating effectiveness and precision of reflux temperature and distillate measurement should make it extremely useful in the investigation of composition of complex
mixtures, in accurate analysis, and in the preparation of fairly
large quantities (up to several liters or more) of difficultly
separable pure compounds, in reasonable time. It may also
be used for the purification by fractionation of small quantities of compounds such as the individual isomers of heptane or
octane or other organic compounds, which are required to be
of a very high purity not obtainable by other purifying means,
because of the presence of other chemically similar com-
Vol. 5, No. 2
LITERATURECITED
(1) Bruun, J. H., and Schicktanz, S. T., Bur. Standards, Research
Paper 379,871-2 (1931).
(2) Dean, Hill, Smith, and Jacobs, Bur. Mines, Bull. 207 (1922).
(3) Fenske, Quiggle, and Tongberg, IND. ENQ. CIIEM.,24, 408
(1932).
(4) Leslie, Motor Fuels, Chap. XV, Chemical Catalog, 1923.
(5) Podbielniak, IND. ENQ.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 3, 181 (1931).
(6) Ibid., 5, 119 (1933).
(7) Podbielniak and C. N. G . A. Gas Analysis Committee, PetroZeum
World (Los Angeles), 14, No. 102 (1929).
(8) Reilly, Physico-Chemical Methods, p. 106, Van Nostrand,
1925.
(9) Washburn, Bruun, et al,, A. P. I. Research Project 6, Bur.
Standards, Research Papers 145, 215, 236, 239, 280, 282, 311,
360, 379, 383, 432, 438, 439, 458, and 469.
( I O ) Weaver and Ledig, J. Am. Chem. Sac., 42, 1117 (1920).
(11) Young, Distillation Principles and Processes, Macmillan,
1922.
RECEIVED
September 15, 1932. Presented before the Division of Petroleum
Chemistry a t the 84th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Denver,
Colo., August 22 to 26, 1932.