Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 61, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013
AbstractA novel chipless RF identification based on a multiresonant high-impedance surface is proposed. The structure is based
on a finite metallic frequency-selective surface (FSS) comprising
2 2 (30 mm 30 mm) or 3 3 (45 mm 45 mm) unit cells.
The FSS unit cell is formed by several concentric square loop resonators. The thin structure performs deep absorptions of the impinging signal at several resonant frequencies related to the loop
resonators. If one of the printed loops in the unit cell is removed,
the corresponding absorption peak disappears from the reflected
signal giving the possibility of encoding a desired bit sequence.
The proposed structure exhibits some intrinsic advantages, such as
scalability (bit number increase) without any size increase, polarization independence, large read range, and the capability of operating when mounted on metallic objects. A transmission line model
is employed to illustrate the operation principle of the structure,
whereas measurements on realized prototypes are provided to assess the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed design.
Index TermsChipless RF identification (RFID), electromagnetic absorbers, frequency-selective surfaces (FSSs),
high-impedance surface (HIS), metamaterials, RFID mounted on
metal.
I. INTRODUCTION
OST OF RF identification (RFID) applications involving consumer packaged goods, postal items, drugs,
and books can profitably enter in the market only if tag cost
drops to a very low price, including fitting them in place [1],
[2]. The presence of the chip on RFID tag allows it working
at a single frequency with the added value given by its re-programmability. However, since silicon chips are fabricated on
a wafer-by-wafer basis, there is a fixed cost per wafer that
is independent of the integrated-circuit (IC) design thus the
cost of the RFID chip can be estimated based on the required
silicon area for the RFID chip. Hence, with highly optimized
low transistor count application-specific integrated circuits
(ASICs), implemented assembly processes and extremely large
quantities (over 1 billion) of RFID chips sold per annum, a
minimum cost of 5 cents is a reasonable estimate for chipped
RFID tags [3]. Given the inevitable high cost of silicon-chip
RFID tags when compared to optical barcodes, efforts to design
Manuscript received May 26, 2012; revised October 23, 2012; accepted October 26, 2012. Date of publication December 11, 2012; date of current version
January 17, 2013.
The authors are with Department of Information Engineering, University
of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy, and also with the RaSS National Laboratory,
CNIT, 56122 Pisa, Italy (e-mail: filippo.costa@iet.unipi.it; simone.genovesi@iet.unipi.it; a.monorchio@iet.unipi.it).
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TMTT.2012.2227777
147
structures showed problems related with polarization sensitivity, on-metal operation, and size increase proportional to the
number of encoded bits. The configuration proposed by Preradovic et al. [18], [19] is instead based on a different principle:
receiving and transmitting disk monopole antennas are separated by a multiresonating circuit, which encodes the signal.
The tag is able to encode up to 35 bits and it advantageously
receives and retransmits with different polarizations. The total
size is 8.8 cm 6.5 cm, but the tag is not able to operate close
to metallic objects. In addition, it encodes the useful part of the
retransmitted signal on the antenna component part of the radar
cross section (RCS), while the structural component may cause
relevant disturbing reflections [20].
We propose a novel chipless RFID tag exploiting the properties of high-impedance surfaces (HISs) to obtain a compact
tag comprising only a few unit cells of the metasurface. As the
suitable amount of loss is introduced in the resonant structure, a
perfect absorption can be achieved in correspondence of each
resonance frequency [21]. By designing a multiresonant HIS
unit cell [22], several bits can be stored in the structure. The
states total reflection and total absorption encode the 0
and 1 bit, respectively. The proposed structure is low-profile,
compact (up to 4.5 cm ), and it can easily operate on a metallic
structure since it comprises a ground plane.
This paper is organized as follows. The operating principle
of the proposed chipless tag is described in Section II through
a transmission line equivalent circuit. Angular stability of the
proposed tag is addressed in Section III. In Section IV, the RCS
of finite size devices is analyzed. Section V reports some of the
results obtained from a measurement campaign. The read range
of the proposed tag and the received signal as a function of the
input power are illustrated in Section VI. Finally, concluding
remarks are drawn in Section VI.
II. OPERATING PRINCIPLE AND CIRCUIT MODEL
The proposed chipless RFID tag is formed by a finite HIS
comprising only few unit cells. The structure, which is composed by a metallic frequency-selective surface (FSS) over a
thin grounded dielectric slab, is basically a subwavelength resonant cavity characterized by an input impedance approaching
to infinite and a reflection phase crossing zero at the resonance.
If the suitable amount of loss is introduced in the resonant structure, a perfect absorption can be achieved at the resonance frequency. In order to create a multiresonant structure able to operate as a chipless RFID, a multiring element is employed as
the unit cell of the FSS. A 3-D sketch of the proposed tag is reported in Fig. 1(a). The nested rings are 0.468-mm wide and
are separated by a gap of the same size. The periodicity of
the unit cell is equal to 15 mm. The chosen substrate is FR4
with a thickness of 1.6 mm.
The surface impedance
of the multiresonant HIS structure
is equal to the parallel connection between the FSS impedance
and the surface impedance of the grounded dielectric slab
(1)
Fig. 1. (a) 3-D sketch of the chipless RFID comprising 2 2 unit cells
mm. (b) Equivalent-circuit model. Each
(3 cm 3 cm).
series is related to the particular th ring of the unit cell.
(3)
148
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 61, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013
where
and
are lumped parameters characterizing
the first and second ring resonator. The capacitance of a periodic pattern printed on a lossy substrate is not purely real, but
it has an imaginary part represented by a parallel resistor [23],
which takes into account the energy dissipated inside the capacitor [24]. As a consequence, the FSS impedance is characterized by a real and an imaginary part, as apparent in (3). For an
ideal lossless structure, the real part of the input impedance
is zero and the reflection coefficient magnitude always equals
to one. The input impedance of a actual HIS structure realized
with a low-loss substrate is instead characterized by a very high
real part and by the typical smoothed transition through zero of
the imaginary part [25]. A very high real part leads to a limited amount of reflection losses. As the real part of the input
impedance
decreases down to the free-space impedance,
the HIS structure performs an increasing absorption of the incoming signal. When the resonance condition of the HIS structure
is fulfilled [25], the real part of
simplifies as
follows [21]:
(4)
The term in (4) is directly proportional to the imaginary part of
the substrate input impedance
and it is inversely proportional
to the FSS resistor .
In Fig. 2, the reflection coefficient of an infinite FSS with
a unit cell comprising two square loops printed on top of a
1.6-mm-thick FR4 substrate is analyzed both by full-wave simulations and with the equivalent circuit in order to verify its accuracy. The periodicity of the FSS is 15 mm. The inductances
and the capacitances in the circuit model have been computed
by matching the normal incidence full-wave response of the thin
HIS structure [26]. The retrieved values include the effects of
higher order Floquet modes characterizing the interaction of an
FSS in the close vicinity of a ground plane [21]. The values of
lumped elements can also be computed in freestanding configuration and adjusting them with suitable relations taking into
account the effect of the dielectric permittivity [27] and the thin
dielectric substrate [21]. The resistor takes into account ohmic
149
Fig. 5. Comparison between the reflection coefficients of the three different bit
sequences obtained with the unit cells shown in Fig. 4.
150
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 61, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013
Fig. 8. Monostatic RCS of a finite multiring HIS structure. RCS obtained with
a 2 2 (3 cm 3 cm) and with a 3 3 (4.5 cm 4.5 cm) array is compared.
The reflection coefficient of the infinite structure is also reported for comparison.
2 (3 cm
3 cm) and 3
3 (4.5 cm
Following the well-established normalization procedure described in [28], the measured complex
of the chipless tags
are subtracted by isolation measurement and divided by the
of the metallic rectangular plate measurement. The measurement method based a VNA is not optimized and it is only useful
to verify the proposed concept. Noticeably, in a real situation,
this normalization is not possible and a reader able to read the
bit sequence with the reflection coefficient only should be designed. An example of reader is the one reported in [30].
The measured reflection coefficient obtained for two 3 3
tags (4.5 cm 4.5 cm) encoding different bit sequences is reported in Fig. 10. The bit sequence can be easily recognized
since the resonant absorbing peaks are characterized by an average deepness of 10 dB. The reflection coefficients obtained
with an input power of 0 dBm agree very well with the simulated ones.
As an additional example, the measured reflection of a 10-bit
tag attached on a book cover is also reported in Fig. 11. The
Fig. 11. Measured reflection coefficient of a 3 3 tag (4.5 cm 4.5 cm) encoding a 10-bit sequence attached on a book cover. The tag encodes the bit
sequences 1010111111. The infinite simulation is reported for comparison.
Input power: 0 dBm.
151
Fig. 13. RCS of a 3 3 (45 mm 45 mm) chipless tag estimated from measured data by using relation (6) compared with the simulated result. The measured RCS of the PEC plane of equivalent dimension is also reported.
Fig. 12. Comparison of the measured reflection coefficient obtained with the
2 2 (3 cm 3 cm) and 3 3 tags (4.5 cm 4.5 cm). The tags encode the
same bit sequence 11111.
agreement between simulation and measurement is also excellent in the presence of low-reflective backing objects.
In Fig. 12, the reflection coefficient obtained with the 2 2
(3 cm 3 cm) structure is compared with the one of the 3 3
(4.5 cm 4.5 cm) structure for the bit sequence 11111.
The readability of the bit sequence is very good above 3 GHz
for both the structures, but the first resonant peak in the 2 2
structure is seriously deteriorated. The first resonance of the
2 2 tag is not detectable with our measurement setup since
the received power is below the sensitivity of the receiver. This
is due to the low RCS of the structure in this frequency range
(below 25 dBm ). The resonance could be detected by using
the phase of the reflection coefficient or by slightly increasing
the transmitted power (e.g., 10 dBm). In order to understand
the advantages and the limitations of this kind of chipless RFID
where
(7)
where is the distance between the interrogating antenna and
the chipless tag and
represents the square root of received
over transmitted power.
152
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 61, NO. 1, JANUARY 2013
Fig. 14. Read range estimated by employing relation (6). Experimental curves
are obtained by using the RCS of the PEC shown in Fig. 13. Analytical curves
are obtained employing a value of 17 dBm of RCS.
Fig. 15. Measured reflection coefficient of a tag comprising nine unit cells
(3 345 mm 45 mm) for different input power levels. The tags encode the
bit sequence 10011.
An estimate of
obtained by employing relation (7) for
chipless tag encoding the sequence 11111 or a perfect electric
conductor (PEC) object with the same dimension of the tag
is reported in Fig. 13 together with the simulated curve. The
measured data are deteriorated by the strong mutual coupling
between transmitting and receiving horn antennas. In order
to eliminate part of this noise, the
is obtained as the subtraction of
measured in presence of the tag and
in
the absence of it. Fig. 14 reports the read range estimated by
employing the measured RCS reported in Fig. 13 compared
against the curves obtained supposing a realistic RCS value of
17 dBm . As apparent, the read range improves as the power
delivered by the transmitters increases. The read range obtained
is a function of the gain of the horn antenna used as reference
antenna. The gain of the reference antenna is approximately
8 dBi at 2 GHz and it increases up to 13.3 dBi at 8 GHz.
The performance of the system can be greatly improved by
153