Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF
constitutional
important
constitutional
Page 1
A:
1) They had sought publicity and consented to
it, and so could not complain when they
received it
2) That their personalities and their affairs had
already become public and could no longer be
regarded as their own private business
3) That the press had a privilege, under the
Constitution, to inform the public about those
who have become legitimate matters of public
interest.
Q: May a citizen in his exercise of free speech
discuss the lifestyle of Janet Lim Napoles? Can
she be a subject of public discussion without
violating her constitutional right to privacy?
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
content
based
or
content
Page 6
Page 7
Q:
Can
the
government
prevent
distribution of religious articles?
the
Page 8
Page 9
the
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
A:1)Extradition is a
suppression of crime
major
instrument
for
Page 20
is
rendered
only
upon
lawful
Q: Which is
investigation
investigation?
better delay in
or
lack
of
preliminary
preliminary
Page 21
this
prima
facie
presumption
mean
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
5)Prejudice
accused
and
damage
caused
to
the
A:
Hearing
before
an
impartial
and
disinterested tribunal and that every litigant is
entitled nothing less than the cold neutrality of
a judge.
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
A: 1)Subpoena ad testificandum
Person is required by the court to testify
2)Subpoena duces tecum
Required by the court for the production of
books, records, things or documents therein
specified
Q: May a subpoena ad testificandum be issued
by the court without issuing subpoena duces
tecum?
A: Yes. Subpoena duces tecum cannot be
issued by the court without subpoena ad
testificandum but subpoena ad testificandum
can be issued without Subpoena duces tecum.
It is not enough that the documents which is
the subject of subpoena duces tecum to just
bring it before the court. It must be testified
and authenticated by the custodian. In that
regard, the complete term for subpoena duces
tecum ad testificandum
Atty. Gabriel: did not pass because it cannot
be used as to determine the guilt or innocence
of the accused. The petitioner used this only to
fish for evidence.
Q: What are the two tests in order to
determine the propriety of the issuance of
subpoena duces tecum?
A: 1)The books and documents or other things
required must appear prima facie relevant to
the issue subject of the controversy (Test of
relevancy)
When are they relevant? Like in the case of
Roco v. Contreras, the Supreme Court ruled
that the production of book and documents
requested
by
the
petitioner
are
not
indispensable to prove his defense of payment.
We do not find any justifiable reason and
petitioner has not shown any, why this court
must have to disbelieve the factual findings of
is
the
consequence
of
trial
in
Page 28
corpus
be
Page 29
in cases of
requires it.
rebellion
when
public
safety
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
two
aspects
of
involuntary
in
2)concept of slavery
A: Like in the case of Caunca v. Salazar it is
a case wherein a habeas corpus was filed by a
house helper who was being detained and
required to render domestic services in
payment for the money advanced for her
transportation from the province. Is this
allowed?
A: No. A person cannot be compelled to work
against his will in payment of a debt.
Q: Under the constitution, this right is not
absolute. The exceptions are?
A: 1)punishment of a crime whereof the party
shall have been duly convicted
2)render service to defend the state
3)Return to work
jurisdiction cases
order
in
assumption
4)Naval enlistment
5)Posse comitatus command to help them
find some criminals
6)Patria potestas
Page 33
constitution prohibit
unusual
from
contract,
Page 34
Page 35
There must
dismissal
or
Q:
Punishment
of
the
same
offense
presupposes that there are two charges
against a complaint based on the same offense
that is the presumption when double jeopardy
for the same act becomes operative. Can
double jeopardy of the same offense apply
even if there is only one charged? Supposing A
is indicted for homicide and after the trial of
the merits, prosecution failed to present
sufficient evidence to convict A. Can the
prosecution appeal the judgment of acquittal?
be
acquittal,
conviction
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39