Professional Documents
Culture Documents
View Journal
RSC Advances
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: H. Li, Z. Sun, Y.
Tian, G. Cui and S. Yan, RSC Adv., 2015, DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D.
www.rsc.org/advances
Page 1 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Haizhen Li, Zebin Sun, Yaxi Tian, Guijia Cui, Shiqiang Yan*
RSC Advances
Page 2 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Abstract
This study presents four hybrid materials of CNTs@MCo2O4 (M=Ni, Mn, Cu, Zn)
of
different
materials
could
be
accurately
described
by
the
Introduction
With the development of technology and industry, aqueous dye pollution,
commonly caused by the wastewater discharged from textile, leather and paper
which were prepared via a simple chemical bath deposition method at room
Page 3 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
pollutants.2 Meanwhile, the hazardous pollutants pose ecological risks and are toxic to
aquatic life and mankind if discharged directly into receiving waters, because they
may be mutagenic and carcinogenic and can cause a severe health hazard to human
beings, such as dysfunction of kidney, reproductive system, liver, brain and central
nervous system.3,
RSC Advances
Page 4 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
could greatly reduce the contact area of the materials and dye molecules, which could
significantly decrease the adsorption capacity of spinel cobaltites. In addition, the
X-ray
diffraction
(XRD),
Fourier-transform
infrared
Page 5 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
RSC Advances
Page 6 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
reached 9. The mixture was kept still for 4 h at room temperature. The obtained
precipitate was filtered, washed with water and ethanol several times to remove the
obtain the CNT@NiCo2O4 nanostructure, the hybrid precursor was finally annealed in
air at 300 for 3 h with a slow heating rate of 1 min-1. With the same procedure
and amounts of CoCl26H2O and MWCNT, MnCl24H2O (0.396 g, 2mmol),
CuCl22H2O (0.341 g, 2mmol) and ZnCl2 (0.273 g, 2 mmol) were used instead of
NiCl26H2O for the syntheses of other CNT@MCo2O4 (M = Mn, Cu and Zn) hybrids,
respectively.
2.3 Material characterizations
The as-prepared CNT@MCo2O4 nanomaterials were characterized with
field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-6701F) and X-ray energy
dispersive spectrometry (EDS, Apollo40SDD). The crystallinity of the samples was
investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD, XRD-6000, shimadzu, Japan). Fourier
transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were carried out using a NEXUS 670 FTIR
equipped with a pressed KBr pellets in wavenumber range of 400-4000 cm-1. The
BET surface area, pore volume, and pore size were characterized using nitrogen
adsorption at liquid nitrogen temperatures (Sorptomatic 1990, Thermo, USA).
2.4. Adsorption experiments
Standard solutions of methyl orange (MO) in six different concentrations
(100-600 mg L-1) were prepared by dissolving analytical grade methyl orange in
distilled water.
surfactant and the residual ions, and dried at 60 for 12 h under vacuum. In order to
Page 7 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
600 mg L-1 (100 mg L-1 intervals). The mixture was sonicated for 5 minutes at room
temperature and stirred for 120 minutes and then filtered using a 0.45 m
microporous membrane filter. The filtered MO solutions were diluted and measured
by a spectrophotometric method at 465 nm.
The effect of pH on MO adsorption was studied by varying the solution pH from
3.0 to 11.0, with the initial MO concentration of 100 mg L-1. The pH of each solution
was adjusted using 1 M HCl or NaOH solution.
Adsorption kinetic experiments were conducted by adding 300 mg of different
CNT@MCo2O4 nanomaterials to each of 1500 ml MO solution, and the MO
concentration was 600 mg L-1 at 298 K. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined
time intervals and filtered through a 0.45 m filter.
The amount of MO adsorption at equilibrium qe (mg/g) was calculated using the
following equation:
=
( )
(1)
Where V is the volume of the MO solution (L); C0 and Ce are the initial and
equilibrium concentration (mg L-1) of MO respectively; and m is the weight of the
adsorbents (g).
RSC Advances
Page 8 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Page 9 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
conformal coating on the surface, showing that the method of chemical bath
deposition at room temperature followed by a post-annealing treatment could be
RSC Advances
Page 10 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
ratio of M/Co close to 1:2. The C mainly comes from the CNTs, while O from both
MCo2O4 and some oxygen-containing functional groups of CNTs. The results of EDS
confirmed that the MCo2O4 were successfully synthesized.
Fig.3.
XRD
patterns
of
(a)
CNT@NiCo2O4,
(b)
CNT@MnCo2O4,
(c)
crystallographic
phase
of
CNT@NiCo2O4,
CNT@MnCo2O4,
CNT@CuCo2O4, CNT@ZnCo2O4 and CNT were identified by XRD, and the typical
wide-angle diffraction patterns are shown in Fig.3 (a-e). It can be noticed that
CNT@MCo2O4 consisted of seven well-defined diffraction peaks, which can be well
indexed to the (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), and (440) crystal planes of
cubic spinel structural NiCo2O4 (JCPDS card no. 20-0781), MnCo2O4 (JCPDS card
revealed the presence of M (Ni, Mn, Cu, and Zn), Co, C and O with the atomic ratio
Page 11 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
no.23-1237), CuCo2O4 (JCPDS card no. 78-2177), and ZnCo2O4 (JCPDS card no.
23-1390), respectively.29-32 It is worth mentioning that no other peaks are observed,
supported on CNTs. For CNT, two characteristic peaks can be clearly observed,
corresponding to the (002) and (100) crystal planes. However, the typical peaks (002)
of CNT are not observed in CNT@MCo2O4. The possible reason is that the typical
peaks of CNT are covered by the peaks of MCo2O4.
which effectively confirms the purity of the obtained MCo2O4 phase, which was
RSC Advances
Page 12 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Fig.5.
Typical
N2
adsorptiondesorption
isotherms
of
CNT@NiCo2O4,
positions, respectively.34
Page 13 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
influence on the material performance especially the adsorption capacity. Thus, the
CNT@MCo2O4 may have excellent adsorption performance, and this conclusion will
CNT@NiCo2O4
144.0
0.8506
23.63
CNT@MnCo2O4
103.64
0.5877
22.68
CNT@CuCo2O4
73.45
0.2630
14.32
CNT@ZnCo2O4
120.58
1.0156
32.99
CNT
174.48
0.8532
19.56
Materials
RSC Advances
Page 14 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
with other adsorbents. It is well known that the adsorption properties for dyes depend
on the high specific surface area and the pore properties of the adsorbents.37 The
excellent adsorption capacity of CNT@NiCo2O4 may be ascribed to its large BET
surface area.
Page 15 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
be expressed as MOH2+ (M represents Ni, Mn, Cu, Zn, Co), therefore, resulting in a
higher adsorption performance for MO because of the strong electrostatic attraction
between positively charged surfaces and the anionic MO species. This is mainly the
adsorption mechanism for CNT@MCo2O4 removing MO. However, with the pH
increased, the adsorption performance of CNT@MCo2O4 decreased. The possible
reason is that a growing number of OH- caused repulsion between the negatively
charged surface and the dye molecules.
RSC Advances
Page 16 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
capacity of MO onto the adsorbents drastically increase during the initial stage and
then at a slow speed, which may be ascribed to the availability of a large number of
vacant active sites on the adsorbent surface during the initial stage, and then, the
remaining vacant surface sites were difficult to occupy because of the repulsive forces
between the dye molecules on the CNT@MCo2O4 and the bulk phase. Eventually, a
plateau is reached after a certain amount of time in all curves.40
times. The results are presented in Fig. 8. It can be easily observed that the adsorption
Page 17 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
equations: 9, 41
log( ) = log .
,
(3)
Where qe and qt (mg g-1) are the amounts of MO adsorbed at equilibrium and at time t
(min), respectively, while k1 (min-1) and k2 (g mg-1 min-1) represent the observed rate
constants for pseudo first order and pseudo second order models.
Table 2 Kinetic parameters for MO adsorption onto different adsorbents at 600 mg/L
Pseudo-first-order model
Pseudo-second-order model
Adsorbents
qe,exp
k1
qe
r2
k210-4
CNT@NiCo2O4
1211
0.01621
374.7
0.9027
2.809
1206.9
0.9939
CNT@MnCo2O4
678.4
0.03871
291.6
0.9627
2.754
709.2
0.9996
CNT@CuCo2O4
804
0.01911
381.4
0.9796
2.20
819.7
0.9907
CNT@ZnCo2O4
906.9
0.02796
360.4
0.9152
2.018
925.9
0.9918
qe
r2
The values of qe and k1 for the pseudo-first-order kinetic model are determined
from the intercepts and the slopes of the plots of log (qeqt) versus t, and plots of t/qt
versus t allows calculation of the rate constant k2 and qe for the pseudo-second-order
kinetic model. The straight line plots of them are presented in Fig.S1 and Fig.S2,
respectively. The calculated kinetic parameters and correlation coefficients for the
removal of MO with CNT@MCo2O4 are tabulated in Table 2. It is obvious that all the
experimental data showed better compliance with the pseudo-second-order kinetic
model in terms of higher correlation coefficient values (r2> 0.99). Furthermore, the qe
calculated from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model are rather approximate with
(2)
RSC Advances
Page 18 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
those
from
the
experimental
results.
These
results
suggest
that
the
= +
(4)
process.
Page 19 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
adsorption involve intra-particle diffusion, but that is not the only rate-controlling
step.42 From the Fig.9, it can be noticed that the plots did not pass through the origin,
Fig.9. WeberMorris plots for the kinetic modeling of MO adsorbed onto different
materials at 600mg/L
3.2.6. Adsorption isotherms
The equilibrium isotherms are very important for understanding the adsorption
systems. Adsorption isotherm provides information about the surface properties of
adsorbent, the adsorption behavior and the design of adsorption systems. It also
affords essential physiochemical data for assessing the applicability of the adsorption
process as a complete unit operation.43 In this work, two typical isotherm models,
such as Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm are applied to fit the equilibrium data. The
Langmuir model is based on the assumption that adsorption is localized on a
monolayer and all adsorption sites at the adsorbent are homogeneous.44 Whereas the
indicating that both external diffusion and intra-particle diffusion are significant.
RSC Advances
Page 20 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Freundlich isotherm presumes that the multilayer of the adsorption process occurs on
a heterogeneous surface. These two models can be described by the following
!"
(5)
"
ln = ln %& + ln
'
(6)
Where qe (mg g-1) is the amount of solution adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent,
Ce is the solute equilibrium concentration. And qm (mg g-1) is the maximum adsorbate
amount, and b (L mg-1) is the Langmuir constant related to adsorption affinity of the
binding sites. KF and n represent the Freundlich constants related to the adsorption
capacity and adsorption intensity, respectively.
The separation factor (RL) related to Langmuir isotherm is also used to evaluate
the feasibility of adsorption on adsorbent. It can be defined as follows:
() = *!
(7)
In this equation, C0 represents the initial MO concentration (mg L-1) and b (L mg-1)
refers to the Langmuir constant. And the values of RL suggest that the types of the
isotherm which can be irreversible (RL = 0), favorable (0 < RL < 1), linear (RL = 1) or
unfavorable (RL > 1)
The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms are shown in Fig.S3 and Fig.S4,
respectively. The parameters such as b, qm, KF, n, RL and R2 values determined from
these two isotherms are displayed in Table 3. According to the determination
parameters, both Langmuir and Freundlich models closely fitted the experimental data
with good correlation coefficients (R2). And the RL values are lying in the 0-1 range,
equations: 10
Page 21 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
qm
Adsorbents
r2
RL10
Freundlich isotherm
1/n
KF
r2
CNT@NiCo2O4
1257
261.20
0.9954
CNT@MnCo2O4
200.25
0.9823
CNT@CuCo2O4
229.05
0.9949
CNT@ZnCo2O4
310.7
0.9507
-
% = + , = -,
(8)
. = (/ln%
(9)
RSC Advances
Page 22 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
activity coefficient approaches unity, and reducing equation (8) to the following form:
+
% = + , =
(10)
lnK0
r2
G0(kJ/mol)
CNT@NiCo2O4
5.4891
0.9724
-13.378
CNT@MnCo2O4
5.2259
0.9844
-12.737
CNT@CuCo2O4
5.7166
0.9995
-13.933
CNT@ZnCo2O4
6.5943
0.8801
-16.072
Kelvin. As the MO concentration in the solution decreases and approaches zero, the
Page 23 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
of MO onto various adsorbents. It clearly can be seen that the MO removal capacities
of CNT@MCo2O4 (M = Ni, Mn, Cu, Zn) are higher than that of other adsorbents,38, 39,
46-51
qmax(mg/g) Refs.
Carbon nanotubes
52.9
46
CNTs-A
149
38
Methyl
NH2-MWCNTs
185.5
47
orange
303.0
48
370
49
381
50
384.6
48
H--MnO2 nanoparticles
427
51
437.9
39
CNT@NiCo2O4
1188.3
This work
CNT@MnCo2O4
790.5
This work
CNT@CuCo2O4
826.9
This work
CNT@ZnCo2O4
935.4
This work
4. Conclusions
In summary, CNT@MCo2O4 (M=Ni, Mn, Cu, Zn) nanomaterials were prepared
via a simple chemical bath deposition method at room temperature followed by a
RSC Advances
Page 24 of 27
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
P. Luo, Y. Zhao, B. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Yang and J. Liu, Water Res., 2010, 44,
1489-1497.
G. Crini, Bioresour. Technol., 2006, 97, 1061-1085.
Z. Ajji and A. M. Ali, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2007, 265,
362-365.
K. Kadirvelu, M. Kavipriya, C. Karthika, M. Radhika, N. Vennilamani and S.
Pattabhi, Bioresour. Technol., 2003, 87, 129132.
Page 25 of 27
RSC Advances
View Article Online
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Y. Haldorai and J.-J. Shim, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 292, 447-453.
P. Xu, G. M. Zeng, D. L. Huang, C. L. Feng, S. Hu, M. H. Zhao, C. Lai, Z.
Wei, C. Huang, G. X. Xie and Z. F. Liu, Sci. Total Environ., 2012, 424, 1-10.
V. K. Gupta, S. Agarwal and T. A. Saleh, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 185, 17-23.
L. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Tian, B. Yang, Z. Sun and S. Yan, RSC Adv., 2014
4, 4870348711.
H. Li, L. Zhang, Z. Sun, Y. Liu, B. Yang and S. Yan, RSC Adv., 2015, 5,
31787-31797.
Z. Tian, B. Yang, G. Cui, L. Zhang, Y. Guo and S. Yan, RSC Adv., 2015, 5,
2266-2275.
B. Qiu, C. Xu, D. Sun, H. Yi, J. Guo, X. Zhang, H. Qu, M. Guerrero, X. Wang,
N. Noel, Z. Luo, Z. Guo and S. Wei, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2014, 2,
2070-2080.
B. Qiu, C. Xu, D. Sun, Q. Wang, H. Gu, X. Zhang, B. L. Weeks, J. Hopper, T.
C. Ho, Z. Guo and S. Wei, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 334, 7-14.
B. Qiu, C. Xu, D. Sun, H. Wei, X. Zhang, J. Guo, Q. Wang, D. Rutman, Z.
Guo and S. Wei, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 29855.
P. S. Guru and S. Dash, Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2014, 209, 49-67.
P. S. Guru and S. Dash, J. Disper. Sci. Technol., 2012, 34, 1099-1112.
P. S. Guru and S. Dash, J. Disper. Sci. Technol., 2012, 34, 898-907.
P. S. Guru and S. Dash, J. Disper. Sci. Technol., 2011, 33, 1012-1020.
M. Zhi, C. Xiang, J. Li, M. Li and N. Wu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 72-88.
F. Cai, Y. Kang, H. Chen, M. Chen and Q. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2,
11509.
J. Cheng, H. Yan, Y. Lu, K. Qiu, X. Hou, J. Xu and Y. Luo, J. Mater. Chem. A,
2015, 3, 9769-9776.
S. K. Bikkarolla and P. Papakonstantinou, J. Power Sources, 2015, 281,
243-251.
J. M. Schnorr and T. M. Swager, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 646-657.
I. Dumitrescu, P. R. Unwin and J. V. Macpherson, Chem. Commun., 2009,
DOI: 10.1039/b909734a, 6886-6901.
X. Chen, H. Zhu, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Shang, L. Hu and G. W. Rubloff, ACS Nano,
2012, 6, 79487955.
X. Wang, X. Han, M. Lim, N. Singh, C. L. Gan, M. Jan and P. S. Lee, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2012, 116, 12448-12454.
F. Deng, L. Yu, G. Cheng, T. Lin, M. Sun, F. Ye and Y. Li, J. Power Sources,
2014, 251, 202-207.
G. Zhang and X. W. David Lou, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1470.
W.-w. Liu, C. Lu, K. Liang and B. K. Tay, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2,
5100-5107.
H. S. Jadhav, R. S. Kalubarme, C.-N. Park, J. Kim and C.-J. Park, Nanoscale,
2014, 6, 1007110076.
A. K. Mondal, D. Su, S. Chen, A. Ung, H. S. Kim and G. Wang, Chem. Eur. J,
2015, 21, 1526-1532.
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
RSC Advances
Page 26 of 27
View Article Online
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D
Page 27 of 27
RSC Advances
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA14748D