You are on page 1of 3

6400 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules

purposes of demonstration or support of and follow the instructions for sending Federal holidays. The Docket
a presentation, are subject to inspection. your comments electronically. Management Facility office (telephone
We cannot assume responsibility for • Mail: Docket Management Facility, (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
coordinating the receipt, transfer, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
transport, storage, set-up, safety, or Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, street address stated in the ADDRESSES
timely arrival of any personal room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. section. Comments will be available in
belongings or items used for • Fax: (202) 493–2251. the AD docket shortly after the Docket
demonstration or support of a • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on Management System receives them.
presentation. the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Discussion
Signed at Washington, DC, February 1, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
2006. DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday We have received a report indicating
through Friday, except Federal holidays. that a crack was found in the longeron
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Contact Boeing Commercial extension fitting at body station 1480,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency, and
Executive Vice-President, Commodity Credit Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, on a Boeing Model 747–400 series
Corporation. Washington 98124–2207, for the service airplane. (The airplane had accumulated
[FR Doc. 06–1193 Filed 2–6–06; 8:56 am] information identified in this proposed 12,676 total flight cycles.) Investigation
AD. revealed that the crack occurred where
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
a drill start had been made accidentally
Nicholas Kusz, Aerospace Engineer, during airplane production. Cracking in
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, the longeron extension fitting could
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION extend and lead to reduced structural
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, integrity of the bulkhead structure at
Washington 98055–4056; telephone body station 1480. This condition, if not
14 CFR Part 39 (425) 917–6432; fax (425) 917–6590. corrected, could result in rapid
decompression of the airplane and
[Docket No. FAA–2006–23819; Directorate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
possible in-flight breakup of the
Identifier 2005–NM–223–AD] Comments Invited airplane fuselage.
RIN 2120–AA64 We invite you to submit any relevant Relevant Service Information
written data, views, or arguments We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
regarding this proposed AD. Send your Service Bulletin 747–53A2515, dated
Model 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F,
comments to an address listed in the October 20, 2005. The service bulletin
747–300, 747–400, and 747SP Series
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket describes procedures for doing a
Airplanes
number ‘‘FAA–2006–23819; Directorate detailed inspection of the left and right
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Identifier 2005–NM–223–AD’’ at the longeron extension fittings for damage
Administration (FAA), Department of beginning of your comments. We and corrective action if necessary. The
Transportation (DOT). specifically invite comments on the corrective action includes the following:
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking overall regulatory, economic, • Repairing any damage found to a
(NPRM). environmental, and energy aspects of longeron extension fitting, which
the proposed AD. We will consider all includes removing any visibly damaged
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a comments received by the closing date material, doing a high frequency eddy
new airworthiness directive (AD) for and may amend the proposed AD in current inspection of the cut edge of the
certain Boeing Model 747–200B, 747– light of those comments. gusset for cracks and removing any
200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, and We will post all comments we damage if necessary, and making an
747SP series airplanes. This proposed receive, without change, to http:// insurance cut to remove any possible
AD would require doing a detailed dms.dot.gov, including any personal crack tip.
inspection of the left and right longeron information you provide. We will also • If damage cannot be repaired in
extension fittings, and corrective action post a report summarizing each accordance with the service bulletin,
if necessary. This proposed AD results substantive verbal contact with FAA replacing the damaged longeron
from cracking found in the longeron personnel concerning this proposed AD. extension fitting with a new longeron
extension fitting at body station 1480 Using the search function of that Web extension fitting.
due to accidental damage during site, anyone can find and read the The service bulletin refers to Boeing
production. We are proposing this AD to comments in any of our dockets, Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2390,
detect and correct cracking in the including the name of the individual dated July 31, 1997, or Revision 1, dated
longeron extension fitting, which could who sent the comment (or signed the July 6, 2000, as an additional source of
result in rapid decompression of the comment on behalf of an association, service information for replacing a
airplane and possible in-flight breakup business, labor union, etc.). You may damaged longeron fitting with a new
of the airplane fuselage. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act longeron extension fitting.
DATES: We must receive comments on Statement in the Federal Register
this proposed AD by March 27, 2006. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR FAA’s Determination and Requirements
19477–78), or you may visit http:// of the Proposed AD
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this dms.dot.gov. We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1

proposed AD. Examining the Docket


• DOT Docket Web site: Go to condition that is likely to exist or
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the You may examine the AD docket on develop on other airplanes of this same
instructions for sending your comments the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in type design. For this reason, we are
electronically. person at the Docket Management proposing this AD, which would require
• Government-wide rulemaking Web Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 accomplishing the actions specified in
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov p.m., Monday through Friday, except the service information described

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:24 Feb 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM 08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules 6401

previously. The proposed AD would 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the AD, do a detailed inspection of the left and
also require sending the inspection DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures right longeron extension fittings for damage,
results to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and and before further flight do the corrective
3. Will not have a significant action if applicable, by accomplishing all the
Certification Office, FAA, if applicable. applicable actions specified in the
economic impact, positive or negative, Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Interim Action on a substantial number of small entities Service Bulletin 747–53A2515, dated October
This is considered to be interim under the criteria of the Regulatory 20, 2005.
action. The inspection reports that Flexibility Act. Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
would be required by this proposed AD We prepared a regulatory evaluation 53A2515, dated October 20, 2005, refers to
will enable the FAA to obtain better of the estimated costs to comply with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2390,
insight into the nature, cause, and this proposed AD and placed it in the dated July 31, 1997, or Revision 1, dated July
extent of the cracking. Once we have AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section 6, 2000, as an additional source of service
received the inspection reports, we may for a location to examine the regulatory information for replacing a damaged
consider further rulemaking to include evaluation. longeron fitting with a new longeron
extension fitting.
additional airplanes. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(1) For airplanes that have accomplished
Costs of Compliance Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation the inspection of the splice area for cracking
There are about 126 airplanes of the safety, Safety. as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–53A2390, dated July 31, 1997, or
affected design in the worldwide fleet. The Proposed Amendment Revision 1, dated July 6, 2000: Inspect in
This AD affects about 25 airplanes of accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD
Accordingly, under the authority
U.S. registry The proposed inspection before the airplane has accumulated 10,000
delegated to me by the Administrator,
would take about 1 work hour per total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 cycles after the effective date of this AD,
39 as follows: whichever is later.
per work hour. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the proposed AD (2) For airplanes that have not
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS accomplished the inspection of the splice
for U.S. operators is $1,625, or $65 per DIRECTIVES area for cracking as specified in Boeing Alert
airplane.
1. The authority citation for part 39 Service Bulletin 747–53A2390, dated July 31,
Authority for This Rulemaking 1997, or Revision 1, dated July 6, 2000:
continues to read as follows:
Inspect in accordance with paragraph (f) of
Title 49 of the United States Code Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. this AD before the airplane has accumulated
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 10,000 total flight cycles, or within 250 flight
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, § 39.13 [Amended] cycles after the effective date of this AD,
section 106, describes the authority of 2. The Federal Aviation whichever is later.
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 Reporting Requirement
Aviation Programs, describes in more by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD): (g) If any damage is found to any longeron
detail the scope of the Agency’s extension fitting during the inspection
authority. Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2006–23819; required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Submit
We are issuing this rulemaking under Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–223–AD. a report of the findings of the inspection
the authority described in subtitle VII, Comments Due Date required by paragraph (f) of this AD to the
part A, subpart III, section 44701, Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(a) The FAA must receive comments on (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that this AD action by March 27, 2006. 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
section, Congress charges the FAA with 98055–4056; fax (425) 917–6590, at the
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Affected ADs
applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1)
air commerce by prescribing regulations (b) None. or (g)(2) of this AD. The report must include
for practices, methods, and procedures Applicability the airplane serial number and line number,
the Administrator finds necessary for (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
identify the operator of the affected airplane,
safety in air commerce. This regulation 200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747– specify whether the cracking is within the
is within the scope of that authority 400, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated limits given in the service bulletin, and
because it addresses an unsafe condition in any category; as identified in Boeing Alert specify if the cracking was found on the left
Service Bulletin 747–53A2515, dated October or right or both longeron extension fittings.
that is likely to exist or develop on Under the provisions of the Paperwork
products identified in this rulemaking 20, 2005.
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
action. Unsafe Condition seq.), the Office of Management and Budget
(d) This AD results from cracking found in (OMB) has approved the information
Regulatory Findings
the longeron extension fitting at body station collection requirements contained in this AD
We have determined that this 1480 due to accidental damage during and has assigned OMB Control Number
proposed AD would not have federalism production. We are issuing this AD to detect 2120–0056.
implications under Executive Order and correct cracking in the longeron (1) If the inspection was done on or after
extension fitting, which could result in rapid the effective date of this AD: Submit the
13132. This proposed AD would not
decompression of the airplane and possible report within 20 days after the inspection.
have a substantial direct effect on the (2) If the inspection was accomplished
in-flight breakup of the airplane fuselage.
States, on the relationship between the prior to the effective date of this AD: Submit
national Government and the States, or Compliance the report within 20 days after the effective
on the distribution of power and (e) You are responsible for having the date of this AD.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1

responsibilities among the various actions required by this AD performed within


Alternative Methods of Compliance
levels of government. the compliance times specified, unless the
(AMOCs)
For the reasons discussed above, I actions have already been done.
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
certify that the proposed regulation: Detailed Inspection authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (f) At the applicable compliance time requested in accordance with the procedures
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this found in 14 CFR 39.19.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:24 Feb 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM 08FEP1
6402 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in DATES: We must receive comments on Statement in the Federal Register
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to this proposed AD by March 27, 2006. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
which the AMOC applies, notify the 19477–78), or you may visit http://
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA dms.dot.gov.
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District addresses to submit comments on this
Office. proposed AD. Examining the Docket
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable • DOT Docket Web site: Go to
level of safety may be used for any repair http://dms.dot.gov and follow the You may examine the AD docket on
required by this AD, if it is approved by an instructions for sending your comments the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
Authorized Representative for the Boeing electronically. person at the Docket Management
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option • Government-wide rulemaking Web Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
Authorization Organization who has been
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov p.m., Monday through Friday, except
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to Federal holidays. The Docket
make those findings. For a repair method to and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically. Management Facility office (telephone
be approved, the repair must meet the (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
certification basis of the airplane, and the • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, street address stated in the ADDRESSES
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January section. Comments will be available in
27, 2006. room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Ali Bahrami, Management System receives them.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Discussion
Aircraft Certification Service.
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, We have received several reports
[FR Doc. E6–1679 Filed 2–7–06; 8:45 am]
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday indicating that significant levels of
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
through Friday, except Federal holidays. corrosion were found on the external
Contact Boeing Commercial surface of the fuselage skin under the
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, forward and aft wing-to-body fairings.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Washington 98124–2207, for the service The depth of the corrosion was up to 67
Federal Aviation Administration information identified in this proposed percent of the original skin thickness,
AD. and corrosion was found on some
14 CFR Part 39 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary airplanes as early as four years after
Oltman, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe original delivery of the airplane. During
[Docket No. FAA–2006–23817; Directorate Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Identifier 2005–NM–176–AD] an evaluation done by the manufacturer
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind it was determined that water can enter
RIN 2120–AA64 Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington the wing-to-body area through the seal
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6443; and drain holes in the fairings, causing
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing fax (425) 917–6590. corrosion. Inadequate or missing
Model 777 Airplanes SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: corrosion-inhibiting compound (CIC) on
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Comments Invited the fuselage skin also contributes to
Administration, DOT. early corrosion. This condition, if not
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. We invite you to submit any relevant corrected, could result in corrosion and
written data, views, or arguments subsequent fatigue cracks on the
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a regarding this proposed AD. Send your fuselage skin under the forward and aft
new airworthiness directive (AD) for comments to an address listed in the wing-to-body fairings, and consequent
certain Boeing Model 777 airplanes. ADDRESSES section. Include the docket rapid decompression of the airplane.
This proposed AD would require number ‘‘FAA–2006–23817; Directorate
repetitive inspections for corrosion or Identifier 2005–NM–176–AD’’ at the Relevant Service Information
missing corrosion inhibiting compound beginning of your comments. We We have reviewed Boeing Alert
of the fuselage skin under the forward specifically invite comments on the Service Bulletin 777–53A0044, dated
and aft wing-to-body fairings for certain overall regulatory, economic, July 28, 2005. The service bulletin
airplanes, or the fuselage skin under the environmental, and energy aspects of describes procedures for repetitive
forward wing-to-body fairings only for the proposed AD. We will consider all detailed inspections for corrosion or
other airplanes; and corrective action if comments received by the closing date missing CIC of the fuselage skin under
necessary. The proposed AD would also and may amend the proposed AD in the forward and aft wing-to-body
provide an optional preventive light of those comments. fairings for Group 1 airplanes, or the
modification of the wing-to-body fairing We will post all comments we fuselage skin under the forward wing-to-
panels, which would terminate the receive, without change, to http:// body fairings only for Group 2 airplanes;
repetitive inspections. This proposed dms.dot.gov, including any personal and corrective action if necessary. The
AD results from several reports information you provide. We will also corrective action includes performing a
indicating that significant levels of post a report summarizing each detailed inspection to determine the
corrosion were found on the external substantive verbal contact with FAA extent of the corrosion, removing any
surface of the fuselage skin under the personnel concerning this proposed AD. corrosion found, and applying CIC. The
forward and aft wing-to-body fairings. Using the search function of that Web service bulletin also describes
We are proposing this AD to detect and site, anyone can find and read the procedures for an optional preventive
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1

correct corrosion, and prevent comments in any of our dockets, modification of the wing-to-body fairing
subsequent fatigue cracks, on the including the name of the individual panels. The modification involves
fuselage skin under the forward and aft who sent the comment (or signed the applying sealant to certain fasteners,
wing-to-body fairings, which could comment on behalf of an association, removing and replacing the seal,
result in rapid decompression of the business, labor union, etc.). You may installing scuppers, and applying CIC
airplane. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act on the fuselage skin. Accomplishing the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:24 Feb 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM 08FEP1

You might also like