Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chris Ward
Dedication: Today my thoughts are with all those whose lives are affected
by Cancer. I dedicate this book to my mum, Elizabeth, for absolutely
everything.
Contents
Preface
Symbols
4
5
His Majesty
I T he Colossal K ing
2 Expanding on and explaining King and Pawn vs K ing
3 Tempo: ls time of the essence?
4 S wap off and win!
5 S topping Passed Pawns
6 Blocking, Deflecting and Pushing Off
7 Corralling and Encirclement
9
9
13
20
23
26
37
40
The Soldiers
8 The Outside Passed Pawn
9 T he Great Pieces versus Pawns debate
JO Which is better, connected or isolated?
1 1 T ricky Pawn moves and structures
1 2 A lecture o n Rook a nd Pawn endings
45
45
54
61
64
68
81
81
87
96
98
Indexes
103
1 03
1 08
111
1 15
1 19
125
Symbols
+
++
#
!!
?
??
!?
?!
1 -0
0- 1
1f2-1'2
Ch
Echt
Wch
Wcht
OL
z
IZ
Ct
corr
(n)
(D )
Check
Double Check
Mate
Good move
Excellent move
Bad move
Serious blunder
Interesting move
Dubious move
White wins
Black wins
Draw
Championship
European team championship
World championship
World team championship
Olympiad
Zonal
Interzonal
Candidates event
Correspondence game
nth match game
Diagram follows
Preface
Chris Ward
Kent, May 1996
His Majesty
- %
-
His Majesty 11
...
1
al-b2
Note that in an endgame position
such as this there would never be any
point in moving the king to a2. From
b2 it can go to any of the squares that
a2 has to offer, and more besides.
b2-c3
2 a4-a5
Now we begin to see a point be
hind the black king opting for a di
agonal retreat. 2 f3-f2 would achieve
nothing as 3 h3-g2 rounds up the
pawn, but now Black has the threat
of ... c3-d2/d3 followed by bring
ing the king to e2 to guarantee his
own pawn 's promotion. Therefore
White's next.
3 h3-g3
'it>c3-d4
Superb ! Although the king seems
to be deviating from the hunt for the
a-pawn, in reality this is not the case.
Here, not unlike the feint of a rugby
...
2) Explaining and
expand ing on King
and Pawn versus King
If we eliminated the a- and b-files
and changed the. aim of the game so
that Black will succeed by ultimately
giving checkmate and White by
capturing all of Black's army, who
B
Needless to say I was astonished.
Obviously I did not want to embar
rass him in front of all his clubmates,
but I was amazed that someone who
had played so well had no under
standing of the basics which are
second nature to your average up
and-coming eight-year-old player.
-
.efid
-
-
B BLSB B
. -- .
. . , . .
. . .
- . . .
.
.
d
. - . .
w
<J;c7-c6
1
c6-c7
2 b4-a5
<J;c7-c8
3 a5-b5
<3;c8-d8
4 <3;b5-c6
Notice how the bishop combined
well with the pawn to cover the
squares b6, b7, and b8, but since then
it is the white king that has forced
its counterpart to give ground. Now
White can continue simply 5 i. a7b8 with a pawn promotion to follow
(or he could accentuate Black's help
lessness with 5 'iti>c6-b7).
Returning to the idea of 'shielding
off' the enemy king which was men
tioned in section 1 , take a look at the
position below:
None of the pawns is going any
where and, though White has a men
acing king, it would appear that,
defensively speaking, the black king
has the situation under control. This
is a very common misconception
with which (hopefully) the reader
should now be coming to grips. At
the moment the black pawns seem
quite safe, but in reality Black can do
e6-d6
3
So the black king commits itself.
Prolonging the decision of whether
to go left or right by retreating a rank
will come to the same thing as White
would merely advance his own king.
Doing so in 'sync' is the most consis
tent, e.g. 3 . . e6-d7 4 e4-d5, al
though with pawn moves in hand to
help regain the opposition later, this
is not strictly necessary.
4 e4-f5
The point. Whichever way Black
goes, White goes forward and to the
side. If now 4 . . . d6-d5, White has 5
e2-e4+. The white king would then
support the pawn's further advances.
4 ...
'ili>d6-e7
Black tries to stay in the path of
the pawn, but White's next move
sees him regain the opposition a rank
further up than on move 3.
e7-r7
5 f5-e5
6 e5-d6
Once more: forward and to the
side.
6
-e8
7 d6-e6
e8-d8
8 e2-e4
The consistent policy may have
appeared to be 8 e6-f7. However
the white king has reached a totally
dominant position and now the time
is right for the pawn to make an appearance.
8 ...
'ili>d8-e8
9 e4-e5 (D)
White clearly has the opposition
because Black must once more give
way. This works out very nicely and
His Majesty 19
..
20 H is Majesty
3) Tempo: Is Time of
the essence?
In the opening it is fairly clear that to
be given an extra move here or there
would be a real blessing. You try to
get your pieces out early and if your
opponent does not do the same there
is a chance that you may punish him.
If you study grandmaster games,
then you will notice that when both
sides have completed their develop
ment, there often appears to be a lull
in the middlegame. Do not worry,
because generally there is ! If nothing
spectacular is available then the
players engage in slower plans in
volving improving piece deploy
ments. Pieces may well revisit the
same squares in a sort ofjostling for
position, and nothing much seems to
happen while the players await the
development of weaknesses in the
opposing camp.
Perhaps this is a little harsh on my
part, but it is nevertheless true that on
entering the endgame, the speed fac
tor regains more importance.
We know that the king is a vital
piece in the endgame. It is very well
suited to a dominating role at the
centre of the board. From here it can
reach anywhere fairly rapidly and
may prevent the enemy king from
approaching. We tend not to bring
our kings out too early as there is a
danger of being checkmated ! How
ever, as soon as the more powerful
pieces are traded off (or at least
b)
1 h2-h3
'iitg8-h8
'iii'h8-g8
2 h3-h4
3 h4-h5
'iii'g8-h8
h7xg6
4 g5-g6
It is probably worth Black trying
the trick 4 . . . 'iith8-g8, when White
should not fall for 5 g6xh7+?? 'iii'g8h8, but persevere with 5 g6-g7 as in
the text.
'iii'h8-g8
S h5xg6
6 g6-g7
White wins.
So 'b' is the right answer. 1 h2-h4
would have been the correct choice
had the black king started on h8 in
stead. Similarly, leave the black king
on g8, but nudge the g5-pawn back
to g4, and again the solution would
have been 1 h2-h4 (or 1 g4-g5 'iit g8h8 2 h2-h4). There are many vari
ations on the theme and the only way
to find the answer is to calculate.
His Majesty 25
2 c.Pe3-e4
d6-e6
3 c4-c5
'itte6-f6
4 e4-d5
Now we have an alternative sce
nario to the one suggested above.
White intends d5-c6-b7, aiming
instead to promote the c-pawn. Of
course sticking to the original plan
by means of 4 c5-c6 is equally good,
but this position enables me to zoom
off on a tangent (as will be common
in this book) for the exercise of the
section:
lf2.lf2
5) Stopping Passed
Pawns
Just to eliminate any confusion, a
'passed' pawn is a pawn that has a
clear route to its promotion square
without any enemy pawns being able
to hinder its progress. In other words
for a pawn to be passed, there must
be no enemy pawns ahead of it on the
same file or either of the adjacent
ones. If there were no pieces around to
stop it, then it could just stroll to the
end of the board and become a queen
or any other desired piece.
Passed pawns are clearly useful,
but it is not necessarily true that it is
His Majesty 27
3 b5-b6!
The point. White has the option of
having a passed c-pawn (with 3
b5xc6) or a passed b-pawn as in the
text. The black king would have
been in the 'square' of the c-pawn,
but it is too far away to catch this
newly passed b-pawn. The fact that
material is now level and Black has
his own passed pawn is irrelevant as
White promotes too quickly; the c6pawn has too far to travel.
f6-e6
3
4 b6-b7
White wins.
So near, yet so far!
...
...
...
- - - - - .
.
.
,
d
d
d
w m m m
m.t.m m m
- - - - - - - - - "
30 His Majesty
1 <iii>d5-c6
<iii>h l-g2
2 r;Pc6-b7
White wins.
An absolutely lost cause. Black's
only hope for a draw in this type of
situation would be if his own king
were sufficiently near so that he
could meet <iii>b7xa8 with . . . <iit ( d6 or
d7)-c7(or c8) with stalemate.
His Majesty 31
Quillan
Ward
This rook-behind-passed-pawns
rule really cannot be understated. On
numerous occasions I have wit
nessed juniors halt passed pawns in
the above sort of position with:
:b3-b8?
1
Of course l . . . .::r.b 3-g3 ! rounds up
the pawn immediately !
2 <t>d4-e5
.::r.b 8-g8
Consistent if nothing else. One
thing is for sure, there will be no white
queen, even on a temporary basis.
Nevertheless, bringing the king back
(the logical choice) will now be too
slow.
3 e5-f6
:g8xg7
Better to be safe than sorry !
...
...
4 'it>e8-d8
This undesirable move is forced if
White wishes to keep his pawn.
'it>b2-c3
4 ...
5 'it>d8-c7
Since the pawn would be pinned
after 5 'it>d8-c8?, Black would be able
to bring his king a square nearer
without any manoeuvring.
5
'i'e6-e5+
There are several different ways
to achieve the same aim. This ap
pears to be the most accurate move
but 5 . . .'i'e6-c4+ 6 <i;c7-b7 'it'c4-d5+
7 b7-c7 'i'd5-c5+ 8 c7-b7 'it'c5d6 ! is effectively the same.
6 c7-b7
If 6 'it>c7-c6 Black could abandon
his intended method (as described
above) in favour of 6 . . . 'i'e5-b8 or
6 . . . 'i'e5 -a5 . Both of these moves
guarantee Black the chance to plant
his queen on the promotion square.
Then the black king is free to ap
proach at leisure.
6
'i'e5-d6
7 <i;b7-c8
'i'd6-c6+
8 <i;c8-d8
<i;c3-d4
9 <i;d8-e7
'ii'c6-c5+
Again I will remind you that the
idea is the important thing. An addi
tional check here or there would not
jeopardise the position.
'ii'c5-d6
10 <i;e7-f7
'ii'd6-e6+
11 t7-e8
d4-d5
12 <i;e8-d8
13 <J;d8-c7
'ii'e6-c6+
d5-e6
14 c7-d8
'i'c6xd7+
15 <J;d8-e8
'ii'd7-t7#
16 e8-f8
..
'iie2-b5+
1
'i'b5-a6
2 <J;b7-c7
Employing the usual quiet move
in order to force the king in front of
the pawn.
3 <i;c7-b8
'i'a6-b6+
'i'b6-d8+
4 <J;b8-a8
Now we see the problem. White is
unable to advance his king because
this results in stalemate.
5 'it>a8-b7
'ii'd8-d7+
6 b7-b8!
This looks natural, but it is the
only move. White cannot allow the
black queen to place itself on a8.
6
'iid7-b5+
11z.11z
1
'iie2-b5+
2 b7-a7
'i'b5-c6
3 a7-b8
li'c6-b6+
4 b8-a8!
The key saving move. Normally
this is unplayable because the queen
could just capture the pawn, but
since the pawn is a bishop's pawn,
the result of taking it when the en
emy king is in the corner is stale
mate !
4
'i'b6-c6+
5 a8-b8
c6-b6+
6 b8-a8
'i'b6-a6+
7 a8-b8
a6-b6+
..
..
...
- - - - LS m m m m
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -'ii
This one was not prepared earlier !
However, it should not be too tricky.
A simple plan is to bring the queen
6) Blocking, Deflecting
and Push ing Off
This section and the next introduce
the reader to a little bit of technical
jargon. This is not just so that you
can sound impressive. I do not re
member ever telling my opponent
'Unlucky, my bishop has encircled
your knight' . But I do feel that the
38 His Majesty
His Majesty 39
3 h8-g7
4 g7-h6
5 l:[g6-g8
White wins.
:n-r7+
l:[f7.f'8
. .
7) Corralling and
Encirclement
Corralling is an odd term, referring
to the trapping, usually of a knight
His Majesty 41
1 i.g3-e5!
t2Je8-g7
See how the bishop controlled all
of the possible knight moves, and
the knight can be captured wherever
it goes. 1 . . . tLl e8-c7 meets with 2
i.e5xc7 - it is the white king's job to
protect the pawn and support its advance.
f7xg7
2 .te5xg7
3 e7-e8'if
White wins.
Emms Atalik
Hastings Masters 1995
-
41 tLlg7-h5?
John had been doing very well
earlier on but in all fairness, in the
position above, things have clearly
gone wrong and he is objectively
lost. Although White is not actually
any material down, one theory is that
the b2-pawn is only worth half of a
pawn. Whether or not this doubled
pawn concept is entirely correct, it
is clear that there is no chance for
White to create a passed pawn on
the queenside, despite his majority.
Meanwhile Black has an extra passed
d-pawn and a bishop for a knight.
More will be said later on this minor
piece imbalance, but in this game in
His Majesty 43
47 'it g5-f4 e6-d5 48 'it f4-f3 d5e5 49 f3-e2 e5-e4 50 e2-d2 d4d3 5 1 d2-dl ! (recallin g our 'straight
back' policy) 5 1 . . . e4-e3 52 'itd l
el d3-d2+ 5 3 e l -d l e3-d3 stale
mate, the point of all this being that
the c3- and c4-squares were never
available to the black king.
e6-e5
45
46 f3-e3
d5-d4+
47 'ite3-f3
White would suffer a similar fate
to the text-move after 47 'it>e3-d3
'ite5-f4.
d4-d3
47
d3-d2
48 f3-e3
e5-f4
49 e3xd2
50 d2-e2
It is a lost cause, but trying to cre
ate a passed pawn of his own with 50
'it d2-d3-c4xb4 would be way too
slow.
4xg4
50
g4-f4
51 'ifi>e2-f2
'ifi>f4-e3
52 f2-g2
'iti>e3-d2
53 'iti>g2-g3
And the white pawns are pretty
much in the bag !
'Encirclement' is pretty similar to
corralling, with the essential differ
ence being that it takes more than
one piece to do the trapping. In the
following position Black is blockad
ing the pawn well. He would appear
to be fairly safe, but that is before we
remember that he will soon be forced
to make a move when he would
rather not.
1 c3-b4!
44 His Majesty
...
'ili>b7-b8
3 b4-b5
A reminder of two rather obvious
observations . First, without the
presence of the white bishop Black
could hold the draw with this usual
straight-back retreat. Secondly, if in
stead of this move Black did not have
to move at all (i.e. he could 'pass'
now and for the rest of the game)
then the king could never be dis
lodged. Technically then, Black was
also in 'zugzwang' and was again
forced into a move that will ulti
mately contribute towards his down
fall.
4 'it>b5-c6
'it>b8-c8
5 b6-b7+
As the pawn can control c8 and
the bishop cover b8, White need not
use any more zugzwang themes.
5
'it>c8-b8
6 i.d8-c7+ b8-a7
7 b7-b8'1W+ a7-a6
8 ft8-b6#
D. Wilson - Sinden
Kent Schools League 1996
The win should be fairly straight
forward for White. He has an extra
pawn and should obtain a passed one
by moving his king over to c3 and
then playing a2-a3 and b3-b4. Once
the passed pawn has been created,
then it can ultimately be used as a
decoy while the white king wanders
over to the kingside in the quest for
black pawns. In other words the last
46 The Soldiers
aSxb4+
40
Black effectively sticks to the
principle we are taught about recap
turing with pawns towards the cen
tre. If we assume for the time being
that the more outside the pawn the
better (in the endgame), then clearly
this rule should be challenged.
I guess the point is that in the
opening we generally put our pawns
in the middle. The logic behind this
is to push our opponents back, as
well as to allow ourselves freer de
velopment. By transferring more
pawns to the centre this also allows
us to command more space through
out the middlegame.
In the latter stages of a game, with
fewer pieces on the board, space is in
abundance everywhere and passed
pawns are more of a threat. We have
seen how, in king and pawn end
games, a passed pawn is stronger the
nearer it is to the edge of the board
(although with a bare king and pawn,
The Soldiers 47
48 The Soldiers
The Soldiers 49
Ward - Arkell
British Championship 1995
With White to play, everything
in the position seems to be in my fa
vour. I have a passed pawn with a
rook behind it (putting rooks behind
passed pawns not only applies to
stopping those of your opponent, but
also to helping your own), and the
pawn is far from the black knight
(and king). Also the white bishop
sits pretty on g2, from where it not
only covers the a-pawn' s queening
square, but controls other useful
squares too, thus limiting the move
ment of the enemy (in this case
Keith's) pieces .
I suppose I should have played the
simple 30 a4-a5 . It is worth noting
that even if Black could reach some
thing like the following diagram,
then he would still lose rather easily.
Even though 1 i. g2xa8 l::rf8xa8
leaves the black rook hopelessly pas
sive, more precise is 1 .i::t a l-bl with
the intention of l:.bl -b8. This is an
idea (i.e. using the pawn to protect
50 The Soldiers
The Soldiers 51
52 The Soldiers
Westerinen - Ward
Gausdal Troll Masters 1 995
40 ...
t7-f6
This is not such a bad move, of
which the intention is clear. Black
wants the white knight chased away
in order to reduce any potential mat
ing threats.
41 'ii'fl-dl
White decides that withdrawing
the knight to a significantly less
threatening square would be too gen
erous a concession at this particular
juncture, electing instead to gain a
tempo.
We have seen before (and will
again) just how good bishops are
when there are pawns on both sides
of the board. Coming back to the
point that queen and knight form a
particularly aggressive partnership,
it would not be a surprise to see
Black (unable to exchange queens)
trading off minor pieces. Indeed,
doing so now with 4 1 . . .f6xg5 42
ii'd l xd4 'i!Vc6xf3+ would even mean
netting an extra pawn. However, the
a-pawn is sufficient (a simple battle
of this pawn and queen vs queen
would result in a promotion) and the
only difficulty Black might experi
ence is finding a balance between
supporting this pawn while simulta
neously guarding against a perpetual
check (White's best chance).
The conclusion is that damaging
the kingside pawns (as 4 1 . . .f6xg5
would do) merely removes essential
cover from Black's king.
.id4-b6
41 ...
Careful to prevent 42 ii'd l -d8+.
The alternative 4 l . . .e6-e5 weakens
The Soldiers 53
'i\Vg5-h6+
48 ...
Black has no desire to lose the e
pawn as it provides extra cover for
his king . Although the queen now
stands on a less influential square
there will be no problem relocating
later thanks to the possibility of a
check on d2.
49 'it>h3-g2
a4-a3
50 'i\Vb6-b3
'iht6-d2+
51 g2-h3
'i'd2-d6
The first stage is now completed.
Everything is protected and Black's
next task is to facilitate the further
advance of the a-pawn to its ultimate
destiny !
52 'ii'h 3-a4
-Ji>g8-t7
Freeing the queen from the de
fence of the e6-pawn.
53 'i\Va4-a8
The white queen continues to
monitor the a-pawn, but is forced to
take up position on the edge of the
board due to the aforementioned
central dominance of Black's queen.
'i'd6-d3!
53
Black allows White a spite check,
for now it is the white king which
could soon be in trouble . Bringing
the king back to the safety of g2 only
serves to present Black with checks
which help the final advance the a
pawn.
54 'i'a8-a7+ 'it>t7-f6
55 'i!Va7-a8
Preparing a more awkward check,
but overlooking where the action is
really at !
'i'd3-fl+
55 ...
0-1
..
54 The Soldiers
The Soldiers 55
Opinion: Draw
Reality: Black win
Another position which is liable
to create confusion. Here White is
actually ahead on material (four
pawns for a bishop), but the quadru
pled pawns (I concede, this is un
common in practical play) are just
lining up to be taken. Generally the
mistaken view is that White will not
lose all of these b-pawns, and many
beginners find it inconceivable that
56 The Soldiers
d7-c7
1 d3-e3
c5-c4
2 e3-f4
The white king was/is simply
threatening to come to e5 so the
The Soldiers 57
1
lth8-hl
If White had started in the dia
gram position, a close inspection re
veals that there is little constructive
to be done. Those who may have
originally thought the game to be a
58 The Soldiers
Opinion: Draw
Reality: White win
To the nai:ve the black pawns may
appear to provide an impenetrable
barrier which keeps the white king at
bay. Black has no ambitions to win,
so he is obviously prepared to ex
change both of his pawns for the d4pawn. However the reality is that,
provided White is careful, Black will
never have the opportunity to realise
this aim, and thanks to the combined
force of the white king and bishop a
promotion is imminent.
1 b3-a4
Even if Black had the first move
the result would be the same, e.g.
The Soldiers 59
B
Gopi Krishna Murugan
India 1991
-
60 The Soldiers
5
.ie7-h4
6 c4-b4
i.h4-g5
7 'it>b4-c4
.ig5-e7!
8 a3-a4
i.e7-d8!
The bishop stops both passed
pawns at once, but Black has in mind
another, even more effective role.
i.d8-h4
9 c4-b4
10 'iti>b4-c4
The Soldiers 61
21 g4xf4
d7-e6
0-1
White will lose his e-pawn.
1 0) Which is better,
connected or isolated ?
62 The Soldiers
1 a4-a5!
Now the white pawns are both on
the 5th rank which, as we will see,
makes them immune to attack.
1
b7-c6
2 a5-a6!
c6-c7
3 -gl
White must not overextend. After
3 a6-a7? c7-b7 Black can catch the
a-pawn and be back in time for its
partner on the c-file.
c7-c6
3 . ..
Black must also be aware of his
limitations . Hunting down the a6pawn is disastrous, e.g. 3 . . c7-b8 ?
4 c5-c6 and any king move allows
one of the pawns a clear run to glory.
4 gl-fl
The game is a draw.
Neither side can attempt to make
progress.
The fact that these isolated pawns
were one file apart was beneficial to
White because with each step for
ward they denied the black king a re
treat square. In fact being two files
apart is less effective (by all means
try this for yourself), but any more
The Soldiers 63
1 h4-h5
l:.c2-h2
2 l:.b8-h8
..t>e5-d4
The black rook is superbly placed,
observing the h-pawn, keeping the
white king pinned down and ready to
swing over to the a-file should the
need arise.
The alternative 2 . . . l:. h2-a2? runs
into 3 h5-h6 !, when 3 ...l:.a2xa4? 4 h6h7 .J:. a4-al + 5 e l -f2 l:. al-h 1 loses
to 6 l:. h8-e8+ (allowing 7 h7-h8'ii').
3 h5-h6
White' s rook is extremely pas
sive, but he does have a plan. With
the pawn on h7 at least White can
force his opponent to leave his rook
on the h-file and to keep his king
sheltered by pawns, thus giving the
a-pawn a free run to promotion. For
tunately for Black he, too, has an ef
fective strategy available, and this is
the more dangerous of the two.
d4-e3
3 ...
Black's king moves into a domi
nant position and mate is threatened.
It is this combination of king, rook
and pawn providing this threat
which prompted me to say earlier
64 The Soldiers
6 dl-cl
.l:.h2-hl+
7 cl-b2
d3-d2
8 .l:.h8-d8
Obviously White does not want to
part with his h-pawn, but the simple
fact is that Black is threatening to
queen. Black is happy to spend time
digesting the h-pawn.
8
l:thlxh7
9 'iti>b2-c2
l:th7-c7+
10 c2-b2
I suppose 10 'it>c2-d 1 1:. c7-c l #
would be less painful !
l:tc7-cl
10 ...
Or 10 . . . 'it>e3-e2, both forcing the
inevitable. Black wins.
Conclusion: isolated pawns are
obviously weaker than connected
The Soldiers 65
2 h5-h6!
g7xh6
Obviously 3 h6xg7 was a threat.
3 f5-f6
White wins.
66 The Soldiers
1 b6-b7!
White wins.
This may seem to be an extreme
example, but a point is there to be
The Soldiers 67
Anand - Lantier
London PCA rapid 1995
White appeared to hold a signifi
cant advantage when the players first
entered the endgame, mainly due
to the powerful bishop pair. Black's
last move (33 . . . tbd7-c5) appeared to
many onlookers to have completely
levelled the position. It seemed that
with the light-squared bishop at
tacked, 34 i. e4-d5 would occur,
when after 34 . . . i. bl xc2 35 i.d5xc4
Black would have 35 . . .tDc5-d3+,
68 The Soldiers
ltJa6xb4
37 c2-c3
This leaves White with two strong
connected passed pawns against one
isolated pawn on the queenside, al
though it must be said that Black's
position is hopeless whatever hap
pens.
c4-c3
38 c3xb4
39 'iii> f2-e3
Adequately watching over the c
pawn (Black's only hope).
c7-d6
39 ...
40 i.d5-f3
Actually this retreat is not strictly
necessary as 40 a5-a6 begins an un
stoppable sprint for home.
h7-h5
40 ...
Only after this move does Black
notice that White's bishop controls
the light squares along the h l -a8 di
agonal, thus guaranteeing the pro
motion of the a-pawn. Black should
rush back directly with 40 . . . d6-c7,
hoping for 41 a5-a6? ! c7-b6 with a
blockade. White is still winning if he
allows this, but 41 b4-b5 instead, in
tending b5-b6+ followed by a5-a6a7, is easier.
1-0
41 a5-a6
1 2) A lecture on Rook
and Pawn Endgames
The Soldiers 69
...
lf2.lf2
...
70 The Soldiers
...
The Soldiers 71
72 The Soldiers
:h2-f2+
3 g8-t7
l:tf2-g2+
4 'iftt7-g6
5 'i!rg6-f6
l:tg2-gl
The checking sequence cannot
be maintained for very long, for ex
ample 5 . . . l:t g2-f2+ 6 'it>f6-g5 l:.f2g2+ 7 l:.e4-g4.
Taking into consideration the
way White now applies the finishing
touch, I suppose Black could try
5 . . . 'ift d7-d6, hoping for 6 l:.e4-e5 ?
.:r. gl xg7 with a draw. Better is 6 .i::.e4e6+ ( 6 l:te4-d4+, forcing the king
even further away, also looks good)
which transposes to the text in the
event of 6 . . . d6-d7 7 l:.e6-e5, while
6 . . . 'it>d6-d5 7 l:.e6-e5+ (or 7 l:.e6-e8)
7 . . . 'ito>d5-d6 8 l:te5-g5 also wins.
6 l:.e4-e5
White wins. The decisive l:.e5-g5
is coming soon.
I hope that the reader will have
gathered from these lines that, al
though these techniques (Philidor's
and Lucena' s) are important, once
you know and understand them there
is always more than one way to dem
onstrate the win or the draw. In other
words, there is no need to learn all of
these moves by heart when memo
rising a few of the general principles
will prove equally valuable. Any
way, just to be sure, a revision test is
rapidly approaching.
First let us have a look at some
more endings with pawns, still con
cerning ourselves with the theme of
one side having a material advan
tage . Something which should be
The Soldiers 73
needs the support of the g-pawn (g3g4), which (and here we see the point
of l . . .h7-h5) means h2-h3 is neces
sary to set the whole operation in
motion ! Throughout we have stuck
with the policy of ' when material
down - exchange pawns and not
pieces ' and this is Black's aim with
l . . .h7-h5. In conclusion, we know
that with a well-placed king Black
can draw a rook and pawn vs rook
situation, and this fact forms the
foundation of Black's defence.
Believe it or not, there are open
ing variations which are analysed
so deeply that Black works on the
grounds that even if White makes the
'best' moves, then a rook and four
pawns vs rook and three pawns end
ing (with the pawns on the same side
of the board) is the best the first
player can hope for. This is why, as
suming the endgame is defended
with a certain degree of accuracy, a
draw is practically prepared from the
opening (remember that in high
level chess, having the white pieces
is considered to be a significant ad
vantage).
Admittedly it is naive to suggest
that White could only win by creat
ing a passed e-pawn as detailed
above. A more sensible winning at
tempt and the correct defence will be
illustrated after Question Time:
Q. With Black to play in the posi
tion below, how would you continue?
A. I like to think that the reader
would have recognised this as a vari
ation from 'Philidor's position ' and
74 The Soldiers
The Soldiers 75
76 The Soldiers
l:[c5xe5
3
.:.es-et
4 lt>g5-f6
-g8
5 l:[b7xt7+
Is this position familiar? Again
the defender makes the correct deci
sion. As we are well aware by now it
is better to put the king on the short
side of the pawn.
6 :t7-a7
:et-fl
As has been demonstrated pre
viously, the position is drawn.
Now it is time to move on to an
other common situation in which
one player has an extra pawn which
is away from the main group . I have
already said that if you have to be a
pawn down, then a rook ending gen
erally offers best chances of survival.
This is illustrated very well in the
following example:
The Soldiers 77
After:
1 l:.d4-a4!
Adhering to the principle of plac
ing rooks behind passed pawns, and
then:
1
'iii>f6-e5
We reach a position from the fa
mous game Alekhine-Capablanca,
Buenos Aires Wch (34) 1927.
Black is blockading the a-pawn
passively with his rook while his
king holds its ground in the centre .
White's main winning plan revolves
around forcing the black king to
commit itself one way or the other.
...
78 The Soldiers
The Soldiers 79
80 The Soldiers
9 'it>g2-gl
f5-f4
10 .l:.b8-h8
Hoping to stop . . . <t> g5-h4-g3, but
there are several other methods of
winning.
f4-f3
10
1 1 .l:.h8-b8
g5-f4
12 l:tb8-b4+
<t>f4-g3
13 .l:.b4-bl
l:.a2-g2+
Engaging in the same winning
manoeuvre as we saw earlier, but this
time with an extra pawn. At the very
least the g-pawn has provided shelter
from what would normally be irritat
ing checks from behind.
.l:.g2-h2
14 <t>gl-fi
15 'it>fi-gl
f3-f2+
Black wins.
The above was a simplified ver
sion with a basic 1 pawn against 2
situation. Nevertheless my argument
remains the same. If the attacker has
a 4 vs 2 pawn maj ority on the king
side, then it is reasonable to assume
that he will be able to generate two
connected passed pawns . Mean
while, the opponent's 2 vs 1 queen
side pawn majority will only reduce
to a comparatively harmless single
passed pawn, and this is only a prob
lem in the unlikely event of the de
fender managing to get his rook
behind it, ultimately forcing the at
tacker's rook to a passive position.
w
Fischer - Petrosian
Buenos Aires Ct (7) 1971
is not alone it can rely on the a2pawn for support). Black's pieces are
tied down to protecting the two weak
pawns which means that he will have
trouble keeping White's pieces at a
distance. Of the two open files it is
the c-file which is the more inviting,
although Black must keep an eye on
the e-file, too, as White already has a
rook there.
16 .ie3-c5
White's knight on the rim is not
too dim, with the text clearing the
way for a safe passage into c5 . Al
though the immediate 16 : al-c l is
also reasonable, the text has the ad
vantage of forcing the exchange of
Black's best minor piece, his dark
squared bishop. Black has several
holes in his position, and with ex
change the weaknesses become more
apparent.
We must also remember that
White is the one with a potential out
side passed pawn thanks to his 2 vs 1
27 f3-f4
Note how both the b4- and f4pawns nicely complement White's
light-squared bishop . Only the king
is not doing very much, but Bobby
has a plan to change that. One idea is
an infiltration of the king with liP f2g3-h4-g5, when f4-f5 may follow.
27 ...
h5-h4
Denying White access. However,
Black's pieces are in such a mess that
White has enough time to find a suit
able square for his king.
28 t'2-f3
f7-f5 (D)
29 f3-e3
d5-d4+
This move is practically forced as
Black cannot allow White to post his
king on d4, from where it has easy
access to either side of the board.
The text does vacate the d5-square
for potential occupation by the
knight but, unfortunately for Black,
it has also widened the scope of
White's bishop.
30 e3-d2
tt:Jd7-b6
During the last few moves Black
has pushed pawns as his pieces have
84
18 b2-b3
And now the same goes for the
safety of Black's a-pawn, for White
no longer has the option of bringing
a rook in front of the a2-pawn.
e8-e7
18
19 gl-f2
a7-a5
Intending 20 . . . a5-a4. Black is
happy to offer this pawn if it means
an infiltration of his rooks down the
b-file may be possible. Of course
White does not have to break his
pawns by capturing on a4, but a
timely . . . a4xb3 will still leave White
with weaknesses on the queenside.
20 a2-a4
White puts a stop to Black's plan
with an ugly-looking move. Note
that the a5-pawn is still isolated, but
no enemy minor pieces can attack it.
The b3-pawn will continue to be a
worry for White, who will find it dif
ficult to manoeuvre his knight to b5,
where it would effectively seal off
the b-file.
20
ll:ic6-b4
21 i.e2-f3
:b8-b6
Throughout this game Black takes
advantage of the fact that he has not
moved his d-pawn to great effect.
There may be some moving back
wards and forwards, but nobody is
perfect. With the text Black plans to
infiltrate with a rook down the d-file.
22 i.f3xa8
.l:f.g8xa8
.l:f.b6-d6
23 f2-e2
24 :n-cl
White anticipates the arrival of the
black rook to d3, making sure that it
will not be allowed to c3 and then c2.
B
J. Fries Nielsen Ward
Copenhagen Open 1994
-
l:td6-d3
24
l:ta8-b8
25 l:.al-bl
l:.d3-d6
26 lZJd2-f3
Seeing that White was getting
ready with 27 l:.c 1 -d 1 , Black chooses
to retreat and live to fight another
day.
l:.d6-b6
27 l:.cl-c3
lZJb4-a6 (D)
28 ltbl-b2
The start of a wonderful journey
which takes a while to accomplish
but is nevertheless worth the time
and effort.
32 g3-g4
White decides to take emergency
measures, though this thrust is prac
tically forced since . . . l:t b6-b4 (with
a timely . . . .l:. b4xa4 in mind) and
. . . lZJd6-e4 leaves White struggling to
keep the rooks out.
32 ...
f5xg4+
33 f3xg4
l:tb8-g8+
With the change to the kingside
formation comes an opportunity for
Black to try a new approach.
34 'iti>g4-f3
lZJd6-f5
35 f3-f2
Anticipating Black's next, which
aims to land a rook on g2.
35
lZJf5-h4
36 l:tbl-gl
l:.g8xgl
I guess White was anticipating
36 . . . l:tb6-b8, but then 37 l:tc3-c l al
lows White to contest the g-file.
37 f2xgl
l:tb6-d6!
Unexpectedly Black returns his
attention to the d-file for what this
time will be a genuine infiltration !
38 lZJd.2-fi
White is forced to concede access
since 38 .l:. c3-c2? fails in view of
38 . . . l:.d6xd2 39 .l:.c2xd2 lZJh4-f3+.
38 ...
ltd6-dl
Not as nice as the 7th rank, but for
Black the fun is just beginning.
39 gl-f2
lZJh4-f5
.l:.dl-bl
40 <i1i>f2-e2
Keeping the rook flexible and
making sure that its opposite number
does not suddenly become active.
lZJf5-d6
41 .l:.c3-d3
42 lZJfi-d.2
.l:.bl-hl (D)
'
43 e3-e4 ';)
..
29 lZJf3-d2
Here we see another problem with
having to defend pawns passively
with rooks . Black (coincidentally)
threatened 29 . . . ltb6-b4, when White
cannot defend both the b3-pawn and
a4-pawn.
lZJa6-c7
29 ...
lZJc7-e8
30 l:tb2-b l
If White had not found the knight's
planned final destination before, he
does now. The knight is heading for
e4.
lZJe8-d6
31 e2-f3
Savchenko - Ward
Bern Open 1 993
4
'it>g8-h8
Black could expect to receive the
same treatment after 4 . . . ..tg8-h7 .
5 'ir'dS-hl+!
Out of our nominated two squares
White is homing in on the former.
5 ...
h8-g8
As seen before, 5 . . . l:t a7-h7 runs
into an effective long diagonal queen
move, 6 'ii'hl-a8 mate !
6 'ji'Jtt.gl+!
The king and rook are forked just
as intended. By all means try putting
the rook on other squares on the third
move. The principle is the same:
White should be looking, through a
series of checks, to manoeuvre his
queen to a square that performs the
winning 'forking function' .
Although I am not supposed to
bring pawns into this section, the
reader may be interested to learn that
it is possible for a king and rook to
draw against king and queen if the
defender has an accompanying pawn
on the second rank (not on the a- or
h-file) . If the attacking king is kept
on the other side of a rook barrier the
defender can huddle his pieces to
gether and oscillate the rook be
tween the two squares controlled by
the pawn. The pawn should be on the
second rank so that the queen cannot
operate behind it.
As for pawnless endings with a
queen against two minor pieces, I
doubt you will ever reach one, but
here is some help just in case you do.
With queen versus two bishops or
bishop and knight the queen should
..
2 'ir'd5-hl+ 'it>h8-g8
2 .. J g7-h7 3 'Whl -a8#.
3 'ir'hl-h5
The point is that now the rook is
forced away from the black king. So
where should it go? Logic dictates
that with his king on a light square he
should at least opt for a dark square
in order to reduce straightforward di
agonal forks (e.g. 3 . . . lt g7-g2 4 'ii'h5d5+ ), but the truth is that he will
eventually lose it wherever he goes.
3
l:tg7-a7
Let us select this move and start
work discovering a forced sequence
which ends in the capture of the
rook. Any 'quiet' move just gives
Black the time to bring the rook back
to his king, so checks are necessary.
Ultimately the crucial check will be
along a rank or file which permits
the queen to simultaneously hit the
rook along a diagonal. The only two
squares that achieve both of these
aims are gl and b8.
4 'ii'h5-d5+
The centre of the board is a good
place to start the process.
6 -e7
lfz.l!z
i..g7-h8
5
i.d7 -e6
6 .:f2.f8+
i.e6-c8
7 .:f8-h8
b8-a8
The fact that this move is avail
able may help to explain why this is
the 'wrong' comer. With a king on a8
and a bishop on b8 a passing rook
move leads only to stalemate.
8 .:b8xc8#
Summary: should you succeed in
eliminating your opponent's last
pawn(s) and find yourself defending
a king and rook vs king and bishop
ending, then try to stay in the centre !
If for some reason you are forced
back it is imperative that you head
for one of the two corners with the
squares of opposite colour to your
bishop. Then, claustrophobia aside,
you will have no trouble drawing.
...
..
..
c8-d8
8 ltJd7-c5
9 ltJc5-b7+ d8-c8
10 'itd6-c6
'it>c8-b8
1 1 c6-b6
b8-c8
12 i.f7-e6+
'it>c8-b8
13 i.e6-d7
b8-a8
With an excellent manoeuvre
White has succeeded in caging the
black king in the unsafe corner, and
he now moves in for the kill.
'it>a8-b8
14 ltJb7-c5
15 ltJc5-a6+ b8-a8
16 .i.d7-c6#
w
Ward - K.Miiller
Wichern 1 992
75 l:te4-e8
.l:r.h3-h2
76 a2-a4
:h2-b2+
77 b4-c5
l:tb2-a2
78 c5-b5
l:.a2-b2+
79 b5-a6
.l:r.b2-a2
Black persists in harassing the
white king and pawn. Nevertheless
they keep marching on. The only dif
ficulty will be extracting the king
from in front of the pawn in readi
ness for promotion.
80 a4-a5
f5-f6
81 'itiia6-b6
l:ta2-b2+
82 b6-a7
ltb2-a2
83 a5-a6
:a2-b2
84 'ifiia7-a8
f6-t7
85 l:.e8-el
Keeping the black king in the wil
derness to prove the point, although
85 lte8-b8 immediately would work
here, too.
85
ltb2-b3
86 a6-a7
ltb3-b2 (D)
1 6) Zugzwang!
I gave the definition o f this German
word earlier. This situation, in which
a player's position goes from being
OK to terrible simply because he has
to make a move, is most often seen in
the endgame stage (when fewer
pieces mean less options) . In a tour
nament in Denmark in 1 995 I had
two incredible examples of it in suc
cessive games !
B
Jansa - Ward
Hiller# Politiken Cup 1995
My opponent, a pawn up but his
knight in trouble, had just retreated
his king with 62 cJiid4-e3. This was
an amazing tournament for me. Be
fore round 1 I knew that I would
need 7 out of 9 for a grandmaster
norm, but I started disastrously with
a draw and a loss in the first two
games. I won in rounds 3 and 4 and I
was eager to keep on a roll in the 5th
round, despite the quality of my op
ponent.
Capturing the errant knight comes
to mind, but this means losing my
trump card (the f-pawn) and so de
nies Black any winning chances
(there is no win because the bishop is
the 'wrong' colour for the pawn). As
things stand, the knight is far away
from the queenside on h2, so instead
I concentrated on the fact that White
has a chance of running out of moves
in this position.
g3-g2
62
63 b2-b3
B
Ward - Ahlander
Hillerd Politiken Cup 1995
While Black was contemplating
his 13th move I considered myself to
be half a pawn up. Black has doubled
c-pawns and, in contrast, White has
an effective pawn majority on the
kingside. As rook endings tend to of
fer more chances for the defender, I
made it my aim to eliminate the
rooks.
43
'it>d6-e5
d6-d7
54 lt:Jc5-a4
55 b6-b7
A precautionary measure to stop
Black's king coming to the rescue
via c8 and b8.
lt:Jb5-d6+
55
lt:Jd6-b5
56 b7-b8
57 lt:Ja4-c3 (D)
1-0
Zugzwang ! The black king has
no legal moves, leaving only the los
ing 63 . . . lt:J a8-c7 64 lt:Je6xc7 and
63 ... tba8-b6 64 c6xb6.
Certainly these two examples have
added a lot of weight to the argument
that pawns become more valuable
the nearer they are to promoting.
Nevertheless, as I warned earlier the
intention is not to give the reader an
inflated idea of the value of pawns
when compared with pieces, rather
to remind you that these foot soldiers
can sometimes win the battle.
Perhaps it is my imagination, but
in endgame texts today a certain
term seems to be all the rage. So tell
me ...
1 7) Wh ich is better:
K n ight or B ishop?
What chess book would be complete
without the age-old comparison of
the two minor pieces? There is not
really anything I can say that has not
already been said before. Which of
the two is the better depends on the
position, although in general it is fair
to say that bishops are held in higher
esteem in the endgame.
Weaker players tend to favour
knights, not so much because they
can jump but because they can oper
ate on both light and dark squares.
Of course this is a valuable asset, but
as the king is always around to per
form the same function, perhaps the
long-range power of the bishop is a
more important factor.
With special reference to ' flat' po
sitions with pawns on both sides, it
has long been thought that the bishop
is superior. The following old game
is one such example of the bishop's
power on a relatively open board.
Even with Black to play, many
players would assume that a draw
should be the fair result. Watch and
learn !
g8-f8
1
As usual the first step for both
sides is to centralise the king. It
...
B
Stoltz Kashdan
The Hague 1928
-
15 tbd7-f8
An unattractive choice which
aims to distract Black' s king. After
1 6 tbd7-c5 'iP f5-g4 1 7 tb c5-d3, in
stead of the immediate 1 7 . . . g4xh4
(allowing 1 8 tb d3xf4) Black has
1 7 . . . i. c8-f5 .
15
g6-g5
Although this allows White to
trade off the pawn that he feared los
ing for nothing, Black now has big
ger fish to fry. 16 h4xg5 'iPf5xg5 will
result in the black king going back
to attack the trapped knight.
16 g2-g3
g5xh4
17 g3xh4
'iPf5-g4 (D)
..
18 tbf8-g6
.i.c8-f5
19 tbg6-e7
i.f5-e6
Now the b3-pawn is under attack.
Also possible is 1 9 . . . i. f5-e4. In or
der to demonstrate the major princi
ple in question, here is an illustrative
sample variation: ( 1 9 . . . i. f5-e4) 20
tb e7 -c8 g4xh4 2 1 tb c 8xa7 r.P h4h3 followed by 22 . . . h3-g2, when
there is no stopping the h-pawn (the
bishop has the b-pawn under control).
20 b3-b4
'it>g4xh4
21 'iii>d2-d3
h4-g4
22 cJi>d3-e4
h5-h4
23 lbe7-c6
i.e6-f5+
24 e4-d5
f4-f3
Efficient. Now 25 lbc6-e5+ meets
with 25 . . . g4-f4
25 b4-b5
h4-h3
26 lbc6xa7
h3-h2
27 b5-b6
h2-hl'ii'
And Black soon won.
.
w
Averbakh - Panov
Moscow 1950
If a bishop is accompanied by a
rook then the presence of a pawn or
two fixed on the same colour square
as the bishop is usually less of an in
convenience because the activity of
the rook should compensate. It is this
sort of logic that has led several
grandmasters to occasionally say
that 'there is no such thing as a bad
bishop' . I do not think that this
should be taken literally, but the in
ference is there. Players often under
estimate the impact a bishop can
have on the assessment of an end
game.
There is certainly no denying the
power of the two bishops. When you
have two strong bishops, particularly
in an endgame where your opponent
has another combination of two mi
nor pieces, the bishops generally prove
to be a dangerous team. The range of
squares within your grasp is vast,
and the logic is that if you have one
' bad ' bishop, then the other should
be brilliant (I once managed to get
two bad bishops, but we will not go
into that!).
w
Polugaevsky - Ostojic
Belgrade 1969
18 :ht-cl!
Were it not for the fact that his b
pawn is en prise White may have
considered 18 .t h3xd7 followed tak
ing control of the c-file. As it is, he is
happy to retain the advantage of the
two bishops.
18
:c7xcl
19 rJi>d2xcl
tDd7-b6
20 'ifi?cl-c2
g8-f8
White can now win a pawn with
21 .t e3xb6? ! a7xb6 22 .t h3-c8, but
this leads to an opposite-coloured
bishop endgame which Black has ex
cellent chances to draw. As you will
discover later, these endings tend to
be drawish.
21 b2-b3
'ifi?f8-e8
22 a4! (D)
The black queenside is suddenly
looking rather delicate.
B
Sherzer I.Almasi
Hungary 1 995
-
1 ...
'iVd4-gl+
2 g3-f3
The only move, as the alternative
2 g3-h3 runs into 2 . . . g5-g4+ 3
h3-h4 ligl -h2#.
2
g5-g4+
3 f3-e2
'ir'gl-g2+
4 'iii>e 2-el
'ilfg2-e4+
Throughout this game Black ap
pears to enjoy toying with his oppo
nent. Careless is 4 . . . lig2xa2 because
this leaves the queen offside, and
consequently after 5 lig8-d5+ it is
difficult for Black to avoid perpetual
check.
5 elf2
..We4-f3+
6 f2-gl
'iVf3-g3+
Initiating a little repetition, just to
show who is in command.
'ir'g3-f3+
7 gl-fl
8 'it>fl-gl
g4-g3
With this move the white king is
very boxed in and mate is threatened.
However, Black must be careful, for
if White had no pawns a kamikaze
queen sacrifice would lead to stalemate.
9 g8-c8+
f5-e4
10 ..Wc8-e6+
e4-d3
11 ..We6-c4+
d3-d2
12 c4-d4+ d2-c2
13 'iVd4-c5+ c2-b2
14 'iWc5-e5+
'iVf3-c3
Here 14 . . . 'it>b2-bl would also have
been fine, but not 1 4 . . . 'iii>b2xa2? 1 5
'iie5-b2+ ! 'it;a2xb2 stalemate.
15 'ir'e5-e2+
b2-a3
Now Black's king is no longer in
the firing line. Obviously White can
not allow a queen trade, so this rules
out 16 gl -g2 'lic3-b2.
16 ..We2-e6
'ir'c3-al+
17 gl-g2
'iia lxa2+
18 'it>g2-h3
1 8 'iii> g2xg3 'ii'a2xb3+ wins for
Black. After the text it is also possi
ble to take the b-pawn.
'iia2-h2+
18
19 h3-g4
g3-g2
20 g4-f3
I am not sure why White is playing on. Now Black makes a joke.
g2-glliJ+
20
'ii'h2-e2+
21 'iti>f3-e4
'iie2xe6+
22 e4-f5
0-1
42 l:tf6-h6
l:ta2-a8
43 l:th6-b6
.:ta8-e8+
44 We3-f4
l:te8-h8
45 f4-e3
g4-g3
46 h2xg3
h4xg3
47 l:.t2xe2
f3xe2
48 e3xe2
g3-g2
49 .l:.b6-g6 Wh3-h2
I I h2-hl
50 e2-f2
51 l:.g6xg2
l:.h8-f8+
52 'it>t2-e3
hlxg2
53 'it>e3-d4
Wg2-f3
54 b4-b5
.1:.f'8-f5
55 d4-c4
f3-e4
56 b5-b6
l:tf5-fl
57 c4-c5
We4-e5
58 b6-b7
l:tfl-bl
59 Wc5-c6
.l:.blxb7
.
B
McDonald-Mestel
London Lloyds Bank 1994
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Wbl-c2
Wc2-d2
c5-c6
.:ta7-g7
.l:.g7-d7
l:td7-d4
l:td4xf4
h7-h5
f7-f5
f5-f4
.:tf'8-d8+
.:td8-c8
.l:k8xc6
.:tc6-d6+ (D)
37
38
39
40
41
d2-e3
'it>e3-e4
b2-b4
e4-e3
.l:.f4-f6
l:td6-d3+
l:td3-d2
l:f.d2xa2
'it>h4-h3
h5-h4
1f2.1f2
Q. Do you think that White was
unlucky not to win this game?
A. Certainly not. In the initial po
sition Black was an exchange down,
but it was he who made all the running.
I watched the game being played; in
the end Black was very short of time
and only just managed to eliminate
White's last pawn before his flag
fell. He had been pressing hard for
the victory and I would not be at all
surprised to learn that at some stage
he had missed a win which he might
have found with more time (Mestel
himself seemed to think so after the
game).
Did the material situation count
for nothing in the previous example?
To compensate for the exchange
B
Palmer - Rendle
County U-18 match 1996
In a very materialistic manner,
White has just sacrificed his fianchet
toed light-squared bishop for two
pawns in order to win the exchange.
Although this puts him up on points
(7 for 6), I would say that with so
many pieces remaining this is quite a
risky policy (it would have been an
even worse idea if the other rooks
were still on the board).
'iWf6-f5?!
19
...
37 g4-g5
h6xg5
3S f4xg5
lDf6-e4? (D)
Better is 3 8 . . . lDf6-h7 ! , transpos
ing to the game. The text presents
White with a tremendous opportu
nity.
20) Opposite-Coloured
Bishops: Always a
Draw?
Since these endings are charac
terised by the players operating on
(and dominating) different colour
squares, it is logical that they are
noted for their drawish tendencies.
39 l:.f8xe8?!
Unfortunately for him, he imme
diately misses it. The clever move 39
g5-g6 ! wins. In contrast to the game,
this ensures that Black's pawn struc
ture is shattered. After 39 .. t7xg6 40
l:.f8xe8 Black cannot defend the
pawns. The alternatives 39 . . . lDe4-d6
and 39 . . lD e4-f6 run into the stand
ard 40 l:. f8xe8 lDd6(or f6)xe8 4 1
g6xf7, when White promotes.
39 ...
lDe4xg5
40 '1Pgl-g2
40 h2-h4 lD g5-f3+.
40
'1Pb7-c6
lDg5-e6
41 h2-h4
42 g2-g3
c6-d7
43 :es-as
rt;d7 -e7
44 rt;g3-g4
'1Pe7-f6
Probably 44 . . . g7-g6 is more accu
rate, encouraging a trade of White's
.
1 i.e5-f4
A waiting move, effectively eject
ing the black bishop from its block
ading post since 1 . . . 'iii> c 8-b7 loses to
2 e7-d8 .
1 ...
i.h3-fl
2 h2-h4!
No, I have not forgotten the possi
bility of en passant. This is all in ac
cordance with the master plan of
obtaining two passed pawns.
g4xh3
2
i.fl -d3 (D)
3 g3-g4
w
Alterman - Karpov
European Club Cup 1995
We have seen how a queenside
pawn majority is often considered to
be advantageous because, assuming
both sides have castled kingside,
there is a chance to create a passed
pawn some distance from the enemy
king. It is clear here that due to
Black's bind on the dark squares,
White's queenside pawns are going
nowhere, and with this in mind we
could be forgiven for believing that
White could eventually set up a simi
lar light-squared blockade on the
kingside.
29 l:tc8-c2
21 ) Tactics in the
endgame
'Endgames are boring ! ' - according
to most juniors, who usually prefer
studying puzzles and tactics. So what
of tactics in the endgame? Yes, they
do occur, just like in the opening and
A. 1 d4-d3!
The game continuation instead
saw the immediate 1 h6-h7, and after
both sides promoted a draw was
shortly agreed.
b4-b3
1
c3-c2
2 h6-h7
3 d3-d2!
b3-b2
4 h7-h8+
The whole point of White's king
retreat is revealed - Black's king has
been forced onto the a l -h8 diagonal
so that White is able to promote with
check.
4 .
b2-bl
.
5 'ilt'h8-b8+
Just one of the numerous ways to
win the pawn.
bl-al
5 ...
6 d2xc2
White wins.
So tactics do occur in endgames,
and it is up to the player to ' feel '
when such possibilities are there.
Remember - it is no good spending
lots of time searching for a combina
tion that does not exist.
To finish here are some nice tac
tics from my own games . Treat them
as more problems if you wish, or try
to put yourself in a game situation
(pretend that it is your move and no
one has told you that you may have a
clever option available).
To begin with we have something
with which all players can identify tactics that lead to a win of material
or even checkmate !
B
G.Gross - Ward
Metz 1 995
w
Ward - M.Houska
Surrey Open 1993
When I first entered this ending I
was hoping to win by virtue of my
B
Bronstein - Ward
Maidstone Menchik mem 1 994
My next aim was to push the g
pawn, a plan which requires some
preparation as the awkwardly placed
but useful bishop will need protecting.
57 ...
t2Jc4-d6!
The knight is superbly placed on
c4 . There it controls several useful
squares as well as preventing the
rook from getting active on the b
file. However, Black can simply re
turn the knight once it has served its
purpose on d6.
Note that I did not like the idea of
exchanging off White's compara
tively poor bishop for my good
knight.
58 i.e3-f2
g5-g4+!
The whole point. White cannot
capture the bishop as 59 h3xh4 ?
tiJd6-f5 i s mate !
59 h3-g2
i.h4-g5
The crucial breakthrough has
been achieved. Black has been able to
advance his g-pawn without having
42 'ii'h3-g4+! !
The master plan. Black ignores the
queen, but is only too aware that in
the long run the capture of White 's
last piece is unavoidable.
g5-f6
42
43 1i'g4-e6+
<iPf6-g5
Black has nothing to gain by try
ing 43 . . . 'if.?f6-g7 . After 44 'i'e6-e7+
Black's maj or pieces are powerless
to intervene with White's checking
sequence. Instead Plaskett sportingly
returns to g5 in order to allow me the
pleasure of reaching the amazing fi
nal position.
44 'ii'e6-g4+
'it>g5xg4 (D)
.
w
Ward - Plaskett
Surrey Open 1993
board. However, my opponent had
calculated that his king was in no
danger because of my lack of influ
ence on the light-squares. Indeed, it
seems that there is even little chance
of a perpetual check.
I am the exchange and a pawn
down and, more importantly, Black
himself is threatening two check
mates: 4 1 . . .'if2xg2 and 4 1 . . .'ii'f2-gl .
Fortunately, after having the advan
tage earlier in the game I was still not
ready to give up, and a few moves
prior to this position a wonderful
idea had found its way into my mind:
41 'iib6-h3+
4 1 'ir'h6-e6+ is also possible,
transposing to the game.
<;ilg4xg5
41 ...
Draw
By sacrificing the bishop and the
queen I managed to arr a nge a stale
mate. Not as good as a win, but cer
tainly better than nothing !
Ind ex
of M aterial Balances
This index provides a n easy way to look u p particular endings i n this book.
It is arranged in increasing order of the amount of material possessed by
side with more 'points' , according to the standard scheme ii= 9, l:.=5,
i.=3, lLi=3 and = l .
Inside each grouping, the entries are in increasing order of the number of
points possessed by the opponent.
The numbers refer to pages.
Schematic examples without one or both kings
2
i.
3
3
4
'it>
<it>
'iti> + 3
v
v
v
v
v
v
lLi + 3
65
29
29
66
29
10
11
13
'it>
+
1 2 , 14, 1 5 , 1 7 , 1 8, 1 9, 23, 24
1 2, 25, 27, 102, 1 20
<it>
'it? +
<it> + 2
19
2 1 , 22, 24, 25, 27
28, 62
..ti> +
'iti> + 3
30, 3 1
1 7 , 64
2
i.
3
i.
Real Positions
One Point
'it> +
<it> +
v
v
Two Points
<it> + 2
cit> + 2
+ 2
v
v
v
Three Points
+ lt:'i
<it; + 3
v
v
Four Points
'it + .t + !.
<it> + .t + l!.
'it + lb + 8
cit> + lb + !.
<it> + .t + 8
'it + .t + 8
@ + lb + 8
'it + 48
+ 48
Five Points
+ .:.
+ .:.
+ .:.
+ .:.
'it + .t + 2!.
@ + .t + 28
@ + lb + 2!.
'it + .t + 2!.
cit> +lb + 28
cit> +.t + 28
+ 5!.
'it + 5!.
'its> + 5!.
Six Points
'it + .t + lb
'it> + .t + 3!.
+ .t + 3!.
+ lb + 3!.
'it + .:. +8
'its> + lb + 3!.
+ 68
@ + lb + 3!.
@ + .t + 38
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
cit>
@ + 28
'its' + lb
<it> + .t
cit> + lb
<it> + .t
+ lb + 8
@ + 38
@ + 4!.
16
58
101
37
4 1 , 44
38, 39, 40
1 00, 1 0 1
73
43 , 48
cit> + !.
@ + 2!.
+ lb
+ .t
'it + .t
cit> + 3!.
@ + .t + l!.
'it + .t + !.
'it + 4!.
@ + 4!.
cit> + .t + !.
'its> + 48
+ 5!.
33, 96
32, 56, 57, 62
93
91
1 16
54
1 06
1 17
31
59, 60
55
45 , 46
20
'it
+ .t + l!.
.t + 2!.
'it + .:.
'it + 5!.
'its> + .:.
@ + lb + 38
'it + lb + 3!.
95
15
1 16
98, 99
38, 68, 69, 70, 7 1 , 74, 75, 97
13
61
1 00
104
Seven Points
<;t>
w
w
w
w
'it>
w
+ : + 28
+ .: + 28
+ i. + 48
+ i. + 48
+ i. + 48
+ .: + 28
+ i. + 48
+ i. + 48
Eight Points
w + l: + i.
w + i. + lb + 28
w + lb + 58
Nine Points
w
w
w
'it>
w
+ 'iii
+ 'ilf
+ 'ii'
+ 'ilV
+ .: + 48
Ten Points
'1ii> + 'ilf + 8
@ + i. + lb + 48
Eleven Points
c;i;> + .: + i. + 38
'it + 2i. + 58
Twelve Points
w
'iii>
'iP
c;i;>
+
+
+
+
+ 38
i. + lb + 68
2: + 28
l: + i. + 4
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
<;t> + :
<;t> + l: + 8
+ lb + 38
@ + i. + 38
@ + lb + 48
@ + : + 28
'it> + lb + 48
w + i. + 48
78
73, 79
50
1 15
1 03 , 105
6 1 , 62, 73
42
1 19
'it> + :
w + .: + 28
'it> + lb + 58
94
1 15
1 00
w+8
+ .:
w + i. + lb
@+
+ l: + 38
3 3 , 34, 35, 36
89, 90
91
36
5 1 , 76, 77
'1ii> + 'ii'
@ + l: + 58
1 10
1 14
'it + .: + lb + 38
w + i. + lb + 58
49
67
'it + 'ii' + 2
'iP + .: + i. + 3
1ii' + 2l: + 2
'iP + l: + i. + 48
1 09
1 23
121
118
Thirteen Points
+ 2: + i.
+ 2l: + 38
+ 'iW + 48
+ : + i. + 58
+ 2i. + 78
Fourteen Points
+ : + tti + 68
Fifteen Points
+ 2l: + 58
Sixteen Points
+ 'i!f + i. + 48
+ 2: + 68
Seventeen Points
'ifi> + 2l: + i. + 48
Eighteen Points
'ifi>
+ 'i!f + l: + 48
+ 2: + tti + 58
+ 2: + tti + 58
+ 2: + i. + 58
+ : + 2i. + 78
Nineteen Points
+ 2: + tti + 68
Twenty Points
+ 2: + tti + 78
+ : + i. + tti
+ : + i. + 38
'iii> + 'iW + 38
@ + : + i. + 28
'it> + i. + tti + 78
87
1 12
53
1 18
108
@ + : + tti + M
87
: + i. + 58
1 12
v
v
52
8 1 , 84
+ 2: + tti + 38
49
+ 'i' + i. + 38
'ifi> + 2: + tti + 38
+ 2l: + lti + 48
+ 2: + tti + 58
+ : + i. + tti + 78
1 24
1 22
121
83
1 07
+ 2: + tti + 68
99
'iii> + 2: + tti + 78
86
v
v
v
v
v
v
v