Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
OPERATIONAL MANUAL
for the
CERTIFICATION
of
AIR HANDLING UNITS
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Supersedes OM-5-2014
Editing (date):
Checking (date):
Approval (date):
Approval (date)
Comes into effect from:
3
4
5
Modifications
Pre-application procedure is removed. The process is now included in the qualifying procedure
Any major non-conformity identified during an on-site checking shall be solved within 30 days
after the factory audit (or within the deadline defined by the auditor during the audit). Non
resolution of a major non-conformity after this deadline can lead to an immediate temporary
suspension until the non-compliance is solved
For brandname participants, the city (ies) and country (ies) of the production site(s) of the
OEM(s) shall be displayed on ECC website next to the units of the brand name participant and
on its certificate.
This check only occurs if there is no RU selection during the audit.
Delete failure for Model Box tests
Section
III.1 - IV.2
Page
5-6
IV.16
14
IV.15
13
IV.5a
IV.13d
8
13
Addition of a paragraph Naming of non-certified range, stating that the range name of non
certified range has to be significantly different from the certified range.
IV.11
11
IV.2b
Real Units shall be delivered between 4 weeks and 6 weeks before the scheduled test date
Software shall be able to store and restore the selection details from the same software version
without any alterations of the calculation. Should the certified performances change due to the
software revision, it shall not be possible to get the printout of the project without a new
calculation taking into account the performances revision
Mandatory Model Box specifications on the printouts
Inlet, outlet and airborn power: octave bands in dB and total sound power in dB(A).
Class <E has been replaced by class E as the class <E doesnt exist anymore.
Mandatory information to be found on printouts: Unique identification No or reference of the
selection, Fan system effect,
Update of the forms
IV.9
10
APPENDIX A
16
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
V.2b
16
16
15
APPENDIX A
16
APPENDIX D
24
9
10
11
12
13
14
This document is strictly reserved for use in the Eurovent Certification Programmes.
Reproduction or translation of any part of the document is forbidden without written permission
from Eurovent Certita Certification.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 2 of 40
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
II.
III.
PURPOSE___________________________________________________________ 5
SCOPE _____________________________________________________________ 5
BASIC OUTLINE OF THE PROGRAMME __________________________________ 5
III.1
III.2
III.3
IV.
a.
b.
c.
IV.2
a.
b.
General procedure................................................................................................................................. 6
Procedure for Brand Name companies ................................................................................................. 7
IV.3
IV.4
IV.5
Software ....................................................................................................................................7
Factory visits .............................................................................................................................7
Consistency check of heat recovery .........................................................................................8
a.
b.
c.
IV.6
IV.7
IV.8
IV.9
IV.10
IV.11
IV.12
a.
b.
c.
General................................................................................................................................................ 11
Test conditions .................................................................................................................................... 11
Test report and tests results ................................................................................................................ 12
V.
a.
b.
On printouts ......................................................................................................................................... 14
On units ............................................................................................................................................... 15
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 3 of 40
APPENDIX C.
C.I.
C.II.
APPENDIX D.
D.I.
FORMS ___________________________________________________ 24
D.II.
D.II.1.
D.II.2.
Form AHU-2A: Data list of certified models & sizes (BN) ............................................................... 24
Form AHU-2B: Data list of certified model boxes, or casing constructions (BN) ............................. 24
APPENDIX E.
APPENDIX F.
F.I.
F.II.
F.III.
F.IV.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 4 of 40
I.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this manual is to prescribe procedures for the operation of the Eurovent Certified
Performance Programme for Air Handling Units, in accordance with the Eurovent Certified
Performance Certification Manual.
II.
SCOPE
This programme applies to selected ranges of Air Handling Units. Each range shall at least present
one size with a rated air volume flow below 7 m3/s. All Real Unit sizes in the range up to the maximum
stated air flow shall be declared. All Model Box configurations shall be declared.
Ranges without at least one size with a rated air volume flow below 7 m3/s (25 000 m3/h) are
excluded.
Application procedure
a.
General procedure
During the application procedure, the auditor appointed by Eurovent Certita Certification shall
first verify that the software fulfils minimum requirements (no certification shall be accepted
without appropriate selection software). If yes, he shall visit the factory, verify that AHUs are
really manufactured there and selected with the software, and send a report of his visit to
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 6 of 40
Eurovent Certita Certification. If the report shows that rules are not followed the Licence
Agreement shall not be signed.
b. Procedure for Brand Name companies
When a company applies as a Brand Name of an already certified company, the application
procedure shall consist in a pre-check of the selection software.
The software shall be a version not already used by the Brand Name manufacturer, but already
including the Eurovent Certified Performance mark. The pre-check shall include at least two
comparisons between selections made with the OEMs software and the Brand Name
companys software.
If the technical requirements are fulfilled and the comparisons shows no differences between
the calculation results, the applicant can be certified.
Once the certification is granted, a visit of the applicants office shall be carried out no later
than 3 months after the delivery of the certificate.
IV.3 Software
An English version of the software selection is necessary. Each quotation of a certified AHU
shall include the date/code/number of the software version used for the selection of the unit.
From the version code-key it shall be possible to check what the latest technical software
version is by splitting up the code in more characters. An example of a suitable code is given
below:
Version: XY / Z
characters indicating a version serial number,
not affecting the selection results
characters to indicate the technical version serial number
The participant is obliged to send the most recent technical software version to Eurovent Certita
Certification.
The selection software shall be operative as an entity with all unit components integrated in
one software. Components in an AHU that are selected with different software or any other
means of selection cannot be certified. The units of the applied range shall be built with
components specified in the selection software. If some components not present in the certified
software performing a certified performance item (see VI.2 of RS 6/C/005) are included in the
technical specification of a particular order, the following statement shall be provided in the
quotation: This component is not included in the software Eurovent certified. This statement
is not required for components serving for non-certified performance items (see list on VI.2 of
RS 6/C/005).
At least four sections must be included: fan, filter, heating and cooling. When a heat recovery
section is available, it shall be declared and included in the selected unit for test for certification.
Consistency of the software shall be verified by the auditor appointed by Eurovent Certita
Certification. In case inconsistency of the software is observed, failure treatment shall be
applied.
Anytime, Eurovent Certita Certification has the right to collect data directly from customer and
perform extra checking of software.
IV.4 Factory visits
Before each visit the auditor appointed by Eurovent Certita Certification shall collect and study
the construction details and claimed performance of the relevant AHU range in order to make
a proper selection of suitable unit(s) for testing.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 7 of 40
Anytime, Eurovent Certita Certification has the right to ask an auditor to conduct a surprise visit
to participants factory as well as to collect data directly from customer and perform extra
checking of software.
During selection visits, a factory tour shall be made by the auditor, accompanied by
manufacturers technical expert. A random selection of at least one unit under construction or
just built, shall be made. The selected unit shall be suitable for testing. If no unit suitable for
testing is under construction or just built, a random selection from files of recently delivered
units shall be made.
The entire composition and technical specifications of the selected units shall then be checked
onsite. Manufacturers technical expert shall fully inform the auditor by submitting all relevant
assembly drawings, specifications and technical data sheets of the selected units. Agreement
shall be reached between manufacturer and the auditor on final selection of Real Unit for
testing.
During annual on-site checking of software, the same procedure shall be applied, without
selection of unit for testing so without the restrictions for measuring facilities. This implies that
any size may be selected.
The expected performance shall be recalculated based on components reselected with the
software provided to Eurovent Certita Certification. The composition and technical
specifications and performance from recalculation shall be the same as the one specified and
announced to the customer. If in the meantime the Participant has officially launched a new
software version and recalculation is made with this version, deviations should be traceable in
the software update record sheet (see D.IV.1). Deviations on performance above tolerances
can lead to additional test (see IV.1c). If it appears that different software had been used, this
shall be considered as a non-respect of procedures (see relevant chapter in Certification
Manual).
In addition, mechanical construction (all the parameters) of one production unit shall be verified
by the auditor, to compare certified characteristics of production with the tested Model Box(es).
If it appears that different construction had been used, additional Model Box test shall be
required by the auditor.
Finally, consistency of heat recovery shall be verified by the auditor. At least one unit shall be
verified with the methodology detailed in the following paragraph.
In case of force majeure (e.g. accidents, labour disputes, natural events, acts of war) which
would not allow Eurovent Certita Certification to perform a factory visit Eurovent Certita
Certification can decide to replace it by another mean of verification, to postpone it within a
reasonable deadline or to cancel it. The Compliance Committee will be made informed
regarding these cases.
IV.5
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 8 of 40
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 9 of 40
cooling/heating coils can be provided by the factory, these components and the associated
performance shall be non-certified. Because it is a significant parameter for the energy
efficiency classification, in case the software proposes heat recovery, then the selected unit
shall include heat recovery.
Model Box(es) for test shall be supplied to the laboratory within six weeks for factories in
Europe and within eight weeks for factories outside Europe (see APPENDIX C).
Real Unit(s) for test shall reach the laboratory no earlier than six weeks and no later than four
weeks before the scheduled test date.
When the manufacturer does not meet the corresponding time limits for the supply of units this
will be considered as a non-respect of procedures. The manufacturer shall inform the
laboratory (preferably before the test) if he wants the unit to be scrapped after the test results
are available.
IV.10 Ranges produced in several production places
When a manufacturer presents several production places, each place will be considered
independently so each factory has to be visited every year by the auditor appointed by Eurovent
Certita Certification (selection or annual on-site checking). Assembly places of flat-package
units shall be considered exactly the same way as manufacturing places.
Regarding the selection of units to be tested, the production places for an identical product
identical software, identical components (designation) and suppliers, same casing (same
drawings and materials), same assembly procedures and ISO 9001 have to be considered
as one collective production place. In that case each time a different production location will be
randomly chosen for the selection of the unit to be tested. The different production places are
thus called sister production places.
During the annual on-site checking (see IV.4), if there is any suspicion that the production place
cannot ensure the same performances as its sister production places, then the auditor may
ask that a Real Unit and/or Model Box be tested.
IV.11 Naming non-certified ranges
When a manufacturer also produces units he doesnt want to submit for certification or out of
the software scope, they shall have a significantly different range name from the certified range.
If the non-certified range can be selected in the same selection tool, it shall be clear that this
range is not certified.
IV.12 Procedures at the laboratory
a.
General
Only the independent laboratory personnel shall be permitted to handle test units. The
manufacturer's installation and handling instructions shall be followed. The laboratory
shall be responsible for uncrating, handling, testing and recrating the unit for shipment.
The laboratory personnel shall make repairs to the test unit only in agreement with the
manufacturer. No manufacturer's personnel shall be present in the test facility during the
test.
b. Test conditions
The units shall be tested at the conditions as stated in the relevant Rating Standard.
Thermal tests will be performed at 2 conditions in the heating mode and 2 conditions in
the cooling mode (one condition at manufacturers rated design and one condition
selected by Eurovent Certita Certification within the scope of the selection software).
Independent laboratory shall test units at the conditions as close as possible to the
selected rating conditions.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 11 of 40
Aerodynamic tests (air flow - pressure - power input) shall be performed in accordance
with the test standard ISO 5801:2007, in an operating range of +/-5% around the selected
rating point.
Testing for heat recovery shall be carried out with at least 20 K difference, under dry
conditions (supply air temperature should not be below +5C).
c.
Test report and tests results
For each unit, upon completion of all the measurements, the laboratory will render a test
report (pdf) to Eurovent Certita Certification with tested data compared to original
selection data. If at least one performance measurement is out of the tolerances, the
auditor shall conduct a test check, i.e. the selection software will be used to recalculate
the performance at conditions used for test: test data will be compared to recalculation
data. Eurovent Certita Certification will transmit a copy of the report together with results
of test check (Forms AHU-4, see APPENDIX D).
Manufacturer has to collect its products one month after receiving the test report. After
this delay, the laboratory will destroy the units if not collected and the manufacturer will
be invoiced through Eurovent Certita Certification.
If the results are out of the allowable tolerance, or the calculation model appears
inconsistent, failure treatment shall be applied.
IV.13 Failure treatment
For each test, a performance item fails when the difference between the declared value and
the measurement differs by more than the allowable tolerance (see relevant Rating Standard).
A test fails when one or more performance(s) fail. In case of failure, Eurovent Certita
Certification shall promptly notify the Participant.
a.
Component failure
The manufacturer shall be authorised to examine the reasons of the failure. In case of a
component failure the unit may be repaired or replaced by a new one of the same model
within 4 weeks, which shall be tested then, according to normal schedule of the
laboratory.
b. Unit failure on a real unit
If the failure is established after the recalculation, the manufacturer shall rerate his data
by adapting the software to the test results within 6 weeks (see APPENDIX C). If the
software is then in accordance with all measurements, certification is granted or
maintained with the re-rated data.
After reverification (test recheck), if the software is still not in accordance with the test
results, manufacturer will have two additional weeks for final adjustment of the software
(see APPENDIX C). In case of new failure, no adjustment of software will be accepted
and manufacturer has to restart the test procedure.
c.
No class reached during RU tests
In case of failure on RU tests not reaching any Filter By-pass Leakage (FBL) class, it is
considered as Component failure (immediate stop of the test) and complete retest is
mandatory. In case retest is failed, manufacturer is excluded from the programme for 1
year.
In case of failure on RU tests not reaching any Casing Air Leakage (CAL) class, it is
considered as Component failure (immediate stop of the test) and complete retest is
mandatory. In case retest is failed, manufacturer is excluded from the programme for 1
year.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 12 of 40
V.
Standard plate and rotary heat exchangers, as well as standard fans and motors shall be
obvious in the software and label is mandatory (first column).
In case of a special project and a heat recovery component is not included in the AHU
software but Eurovent certified or covered by IV.5a or IV.5b (second column), or if the
motor is out only (third column), label is mandatory.
In case of special projects and if displaying the energy label is not allowed (third column),
the following statement shall be written instead: Heat recovery component and/or fan
selection beyond certified software does not comply with the Eurovent Certified
Performance rules for label designation.
b. On units
Each Participant is entitled to display the Eurovent Certified Performance mark on units
of ranges which have been certified:
By using the relevant Eurovent Certified Performance mark
By application of the relevant Eurovent Certified Performance mark directly on the
nameplate
By using the relevant Eurovent Certified Performance energy efficiency label if
applicable. In case the Participant has chosen to display the Eurovent Certified
Performance Energy Efficiency label on units, each unit shall be marked, even the
one with class E.
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 15 of 40
APPENDIX A.
The auditor assigned by Eurovent Certita Certification shall receive a software program, on a CD-Rom or
a website with remote access. Other access facilities are only possible in consultation with Eurovent Certita
Certification and the auditor. The primary language of the software including outputs must be in English.
The software must be able to calculate operating points between the upper and lower operating condition
without changing any components (for example):
The operating point of fan (nominal air flow = 100 %) have to calculate by +5 %, +2.5 %,
-2.5 %
and -5 % of nominal air flow. The fan speed must be constant. The external pressure will be variable.
The software has to calculate the power input (in kW) at the electric terminal of the motor / FUcontroller.
The software must have the possibility to calculate the heating capacity with the selected heating
coil between the upper and lower operating condition. It must be possible to change the air flow rate,
the water flow rate, the air inlet temperature. The software must show and print out the results. The
software must give a warning, in case that the result data run out of limits.
The software must have the possibility to calculate the cooling capacity with the selected cooling coil
between the upper and lower operating condition. It must be possible to change the air flow rate, the
water flow rate, the air inlet temperature, the air inlet humidity. The software must show and print out
the results. The software must give a warning, in case the result data run out of limits.
The software must have the possibility to calculate the heat recovery capacity with the selected heat
recovery system between the upper and lower operating condition. It must be possible to change
the air flow rate, the supply air inlet temperature and humidity, the exhaust air inlet temperature and
humidity. The software must show and print out the results. The software must give a warning, in
case the result data run out of limits.
The selection software must have the following Mandatory requirements including Input data & Output
data.
General Requirements:
Printouts should be provided as a minimum pdf file.
There must be only one Eurovent certified software version.
All components must be described by product key or relevant information (manufacturer name and
reference).
Calculations must all be at a minimum in SI units.
The software must show a sketch of the AHU
Software shall be able to store and restore the selection details from the same software version
without any alterations of the calculation.
Should the certified performances change due to the software revision, it shall not be possible to get
the printout of the project without a new calculation taking into account the performances revision.
General: all data which are asked for in D.IV.1 Form AHU-4A: Recalculation after Real Unit Test must
be given from the selection software.
Mandatory Input Data:
Reference nomenclature of unit i.e ABC 40.
Upper & lower Summer & Winter operating conditions (outdoor air temp & humidity).
Air flow rate & external pressure.
Heating coil water inlet temp, water flow rate or water outlet temp & supply air temp behind the heater
coil.
Cooling coil water inlet temp, water flow rate or water outlet temp & outlet air temp & relative humidity
and supply air temp and humidity behind the cooler.
Selected filter section (filter class).
Selected fan section (fan type, motor type).
Selected inlet & outlet sections.
Selected heat recovery system with all necessary inputs (Rotary, Plate HX & Run around coils.)
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 16 of 40
Absorbed electrical power from the mains for each fan in the AHU, including the power losses in any
motor speed controller. If no fan speed controller is quoted, but the fan needs such a device to
operate on the design fan speed, the power loss of such device shall be included in the specified
absorbed power.
Filters
Filter type and class
Pressure drops: clean, design and final conditions
Heat recovery system (HRS)
Dry temperature efficiency (no condensation on extract side) of the HRS for design winter operation
at equal mass flows (extract flow equal to design supply flow)
Air side pressure drop across the heat recovery system on the extract side and supply side for the
design air flows at winter condition and standard density 1.2 kg/m3.
Brine concentration in fluid of run around coil system (where applicable)
Coils
Statement if air side pressure drop cooling coil is for dry (dry pressure drop) or wet (wet pressure
drop) condition or statement if fan has been designed for dry or wet condition.
Heating coil: air side Inlet/Outlet temperatures, airside pressure drop, water flow, & waterside
Inlet/Outlet temperatures & pressure drop.
Cooling coil: air side Inlet/Outlet temperatures, inlet/Outlet relative humidity, air side pressure drops
(designed: wet or dry, both can be provided, however dry shall be always visible in the software),
waterside flow rate and Inlet/Outlet temperatures and pressure drop.
Casing
Casing name
Profile
Thickness of the panel
Insulation material
Internal and external sheet metal thickness
Frame
Single or double skin
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 18 of 40
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 19 of 40
B.II.1.
Figure 2: Examples for Eurovent Certified Performance Energy Efficiency Label for units
APPENDIX C.
CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
1
1
1
4
1
3.5
7.5
11
16
0
1
5
2
18.5
20
21.5
22.5
26.5
28
29
32
33.5
34
16
52
34
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 21 of 40
APLLICATION
PROCEDURE:
PRE-CHECKING
1 week
1.5 weeks
Software
failure
Checking of
software
Send revised
software
6 weeks
NO
Softwar
e ok ?
YES
Appointment
3.5 weeks
Licence
agreement
Factory visit
4 weeks
1.5 weeks
2 weeks
5 weeks
4 weeks
0.5 week
Failure
treatment:
4 weeks
1 week
Factory
ok?
YES
Visit report
Sign
licence
agreement
Report of
selection of
real unit
Up-date of
lists
Quotation for
real unit
Quotation for
model box
Purchase
order
Purchase
order
Delivery
Delivery
Testing and
test report
Testing and
test report
Checking
Send revised
software
3 weeks
Checking
report
NO
Softwar
e
ok?
YES
0.5 weeks
EUROVENT C.
certificate
ISO
9001?
NO: every
year
YES: every
3 years
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 22 of 40
Eurovent Certita Certification informs the manufacturer about the need for a visit of the factory.
The manufacturer has to give to the auditor an appointment for visit of the factory.
Waiting for the visit date.
The auditor has to visit manufacturers factory and check sale data. The auditor sends the visit
report to Eurovent Certita Certification.
Eurovent Certita Certification has to send the report including its comments to the
manufacturer. If the onsite software version is in accordance with the certified software version
kept by the technical auditor and the last test results, the certification is granted for the next
period.
In case the software is not in accordance with the test results, the manufacturer has to send the
revised software according to the test results to the auditor.
The auditor has to finalize the recheck of the software and send back to Eurovent Certita
Certification a new report.
If the software is in accordance with the test results, the certification is granted for the next
period. In case the software is still not in accordance with the test results it is considered as
violation of rules.
Appointment
4 weeks
Factory visit
0.5 weeks
Failure
treatment:
1.5 weeks
6.5
7.5
10.5
13
13.5
18 13.5
Send revised
software
Checking
report
Sofwar
e
ok?
YES
2 weeks
Checking
3 weeks
1 week
NO
EUROVENT C.
certificate
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 23 of 40
APPENDIX D.
FORMS
id
Trade
name
Range
Agree
ment
Sub
Range
Model
name
Height
Catalo
Software
gue
Width
Perf
Lib
Certified
The Perf Lib column should be filled in with: heating only/reversible/cooling only and with heat
recovery/without heat recovery.
D.I.2.
Form AHU-1B: Data list of certified model boxes, or casing
constructions
n
PA
id
Trade
name
Range
Strength
400 Pa
700 Pa
Leakage
Insertion
125
Insertion
250
Insertion
500
Panel
shape
Panel
thickness
Sheet
metal
thickness
Agreement
Casing
name
Thermal
Bridge
Thermal
Transmittance
Strength
400 Pa
700 Pa
Leakage
Insertion
1000
Insertion
2000
Insertion
4000
Insertion
8000
Corner post
Mullion
Insulation
material
Insulation
material
density
Insulation
material
conductivity
Way of
insulation
mounting
Metal sheet
of panel
Certified
Filter
construction
n
id
PA
Trade
Name
Range
Brand name
Sub
Range
Model
Height
Width
id
n
PA
Trade
Name
Range
Sub
Range
Model
Software
Catalogue
n
PA
Trade
Name
Range
Brand name
Casing
Name
id
n
PA
Trade
Name
Range
Casing
Name
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 24 of 40
APPLICANT:
xxx
DESIGNATION:
xxx
Software version:
Manufacturing Place:
Participant Contact:
xxx
xxx
xxx
PERFORMANCE
Nominal
Meas. 1
applied value - 5,0%
a - Air flow
1)
2)
2)
m3/h
Pa
Pa
Pa
rpm
Values transposed to
kW
125
250
500
Pa - Air flow:
1000
2000
m/h at
4000
8000
20
20
m/h at
20
8000 Hz
Total
Hz
dB
125
250
500
Pa - Air flow:
1000
2000
m/h at
4000
8000
Total
Hz
dB
0
500
Pa - Air flow:
1000
2000
0
4000
Total
dB
1st point
2nd point
0 m3/h
0 kg/h
27 /
7 / 12 C
47 /
dm3/h
%
kW
0 m3/h
0 kg/h
m3/h
kg/h
dm3/h
%
kW
m3/h
kg/h
Air in/out :
10 /
Air in/out :
60 /
dm3/h
kW
dm3/h
kW
The test w ill be perform ed at the specified w ater flow rate and the specified air flow rate. The air flow rate w ill be adjusted
before the test if the claim ed available pressure for this flow is not achieved during the aerodynam ic test.
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
Temp.
supply-air inlet
(21)
supply-air outlet
(22)
exhaust-air inlet
exhaust-air outlet
(11)
(12)
C
C
ratio
0,0
m3/h
0,0
kg/h
0,0
m3/h
0,0
kg/h
AHU, OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 25 of 40
DESIGNATION
xxx
xxx
Software version
Manufacturing Place
Participant Contact
xxx
xxx
xxx
APPLICANT
FAN
Type
Model
Diameter / Number
Manufacturer
Speed
belt pulley diameter
belt pulley type
Belt type
Efficiency of belt drive
Motor
Type
Model
Diameter / Number
Manufacturer
Nominal current
Efficiency of motor
belt pulley diameter
Start current
Speed
Nominal voltage
Frequency converter
Frequency (in / out)
Efficiency of converter
FILTER
Brand and type
Filter class
Initial pressure drop (clean filter)
Final pressure drop (dirty filter)
Design pressure drop
Type of filterframe
Number and size of filters
Type
Manufacturer
Fin spacing / number per m
Fin thickness and type
Length(L) x height(H) x width(W)
Number of rows deep
Number of circuits
Tube nominal OD
Tube pattern
Tube innergrooved/smooth
Inlet connection
Outlet connection
Internal volume
Air pressure drop (dry) qv1 & qv2
Air pressure drop (wet) qv1 & qv2
Type code of manufacturer
Drop eliminator of cooling coil
Air pressure drop at qv1 & qv2
rpm
mm
%
Exhaust air circuit
A
%
mm
A
rpm
V
A
%
mm
A
rpm
V
Hz
%
Hz
%
Exhaust air circuit
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
Pa
COOLING COIL
HEATING COIL
mm Nb/m
mm Nb/m
mm type
mm type
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
dm3
Pa
Pa
dm3
Pa
Pa
yes / no
Pa
---
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 26 of 40
DESIGNATION
xxx
xxx
Software version
Manufacturing Place
Participant Contact
xxx
xxx
xxx
APPLICANT
mm
mm
mm
Pa
yes / no
Pa
TOTAL UNIT
Drop eliminator of HR
Air pressure drop at nominal point
Net weight
kg
Dimensions (overall)
mm
xxx
xxx
APPLICANT
DESIGNATION
Software version
Manufacturing Place
Participant Contact
xxx
xxx
xxx
HEAT RECOVERY COILS
COOLING COIL
Type
Manufacturer
Designation
Diameter / depth
Fin Spacing / number per m
Fin Thickness and type
length(l)xheight(H)xwidth(L)
Number of Rows deep
Number of circuits
Tube Nominal OD
Tube Pattern
Tube innergrooved/smooth
Inlet Connection
Outlet Connection
Internal Volume
Air pressure drop at nominal point
HEATING COIL
mm
mm Nb/m
mm type
mm
mm Nb/m
mm type
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
dm3
Pa
mm
mm
dm3
Pa
yes / no
Pa
TOTAL UNIT
Net weight
Dimensions (overall)
Dimensional drawing of unit and the coil circuiting shall be provided
kg
mm
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 27 of 40
DESIGNATION
xxx
xxx
Software version
xxx
APPLICANT
Manufacturing Place
Participant Contact
xxx
xxx
HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM
ROTARY
Type
Manufacturer
Reference of the wheel
Material
Fin Spacing or Density
Fin Thickness and type
Pressure drop on air side sup. / ext.
Diameter
Depth
Speed
Power input
Nominal voltage
Frequency
mm
mm type
Pa
mm
mm
rpm
W
V
Hz
TOTAL UNIT
Net weight
Dimensions (overall)
Dimensional drawing of unit and the coil circuiting shall be provided
kg
mm
xxx
xxx
APPLICANT
DESIGNATION
xxx
xxx
Software version
Manufacturing Place
Participant Contact
xxx
yes / no
Pa
yes / no
Pa
TOTAL UNIT
Net weight
Dimensions (overall)
Dimensional drawing of unit and the coil circuiting shall be provided
kg
mm
Physical checks shall made on the additional informations and result shown before performance test.
Fin spacing - the number of fins shall be counted over three separate 100 mm sections of the coil face, the
average figure shall then be divided by 100 and the reciprocal shown to 2 decimal places.
Dimensional drawing and circuit diagram - this shall be checked against test unit.
Fan type : Axial - Centrifugal - Tangential 3
Fin type : Flat - Corrugated - Louvered - Wavy
action or reaction
Date :
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 28 of 40
D.III.2.
name
email adress
MODEL BOX 1
Range names using this casing:
Type name:
Designation of the panel:
Max.admissible pressure:
Pa
material corners:
plastic (coated)
aluminium
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
kg/m
W/mK
on the panels:
on the frame:
Thermal breaks
on access doors:
mm
mm
x
on the mullion:
on the connection of the section:
mm
Applied classes
(specified in EN1886)
Maximum relative deflection:
mm/m
a - Casing strength
- 400 Pa + 700 Pa
- 400 Pa
+ 700 Pa
l.s -1m-2
%
d - Thermal transmittance
W.m-2.K-1
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
f - Acoustical insulation
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 29 of 40
Date of recalculation
Participant
Participant contact
Auditor
Real unit designation
Software Designation
Version number
Laboratory
CAPACITY
Applied
XX/XX/XXXX
XXX
XXX
Email:
XXX
Email:
XXX
XXX
XXX
TUV NORD OR DTI OR TUV SUD
Name:
Name:
1st point
Measured
Deviation
Applied
2nd point
Measured
Deviation
XXX
XXX
Result
Cooling kW
##########
########## #VALEUR!
Heating kW
##########
########## #VALEUR!
Tolerance -2%
Measured
kPa
dm /h
Cooling
Heating
kPa
dm /h
Deviation
#1
Deviation
#2
Result
1st point
2nd point
1st point
2nd point
The pressure losses are compared with the following formulas #1 and #2:
Deviation#1 {[( D p / q m1,8 ) Measured / ( D p / q m1,8 ) Applied ] - 1}
Tolerance: 10%
Tolerance: 2.0k Pa
HEAT RECOVERY
Temperatures in C
Applied
Measured
Applied
Measured
In
Supply air
Deviation
#2
Result
Out
In
Exhaust air
Deviation
#1
Out
Ratio
#VALEUR! #VALEUR!
Deviation
#VALEUR!
Result
#VALEUR!
Tolerance-3%-points
SOUND POWER
Conditions during acoustic test
Fan speed:
rpm
2305
Air flow:
m/h
5000
ESP:
Pa
250
Octave Band In-duct OUTLET in dB
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
Applied
dB
Measured
Deviation
Result
Hz
dB
dB
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
Hz
Applied
dB
Measured
dB
dB
Measured
Deviation
Tolerance
Result
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
dB(A)
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 30 of 40
XX/XX/XXXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
TUV NORD OR DTI OR TUV SUD
Measured
Applied
Measured
(3)
Deviation
Results
Deviation
Results
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
Available
Applied
Measured
Applied
Measured
Applied
limit
Air flow / PowerXinput
Measured
Y limit
Applied
(1) Allowable deviation : -4 % or -15 Pa
(1) Allowable deviation : -4 % or
#VALEUR!
-15 Pa
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
(1) Allowable deviation : -4 % or -15 Pa
2,80
2,60
Power input in kW
External pressure in Pa
X limit
Y limit
Air flow / Pressure
(1) Allowable deviation : -4 0% or -15 Pa
(1) Allowable
200 deviation : -4 0% or -15 Pa
#VALEUR!
0
190
#VALEUR!
0
180 deviation : -4 0% or -15 Pa
(1) Allowable
170
160
150
140
130
120
2,40
Measured
2,20
2,00
1,80
1,60
110
1,40
100
0
XX/XX/XXXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
TUV NORD OR DTI OR TUV SUD
95,0%
97,5%
100,0%
102,5%
105,0%
pclean filter in Pa
measured
applied
pclean, mea-app
pdesign filter in Pa
applied
#VALEUR!
########
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
########
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
########
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
########
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
########
#VALEUR!
ESP in Pa
measured
available
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
#VALEUR!
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 31 of 40
D.IV.2.
Company Logo
XXXXX Software Name
Software Update Record Sheet
Prepared By: _____________________________
Software Revision
Date
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 32 of 40
APPENDIX E.
Each certified range shall be allocated of 15 audit points (after first delivery of certificate). Each major non-compliance related to the range
(independently of the manufacturing place), shall remove 2 points to the account of the range.
If a range reaches 0 point, Participant shall be notified for immediate suspension of the range for one year. A 24-months period without major nonconformity resets the account to the initial level.
ARE ENERGY
COMPONENTS
THE SAME?
IS MECHANICAL
CONSTRUCTION
THE SAME?
MANDATORY
FORBIDDEN
COMMENTS
NO
Energy efficiency
label1 for A
YES
Energy efficiency
label1for A
YES
YES
Energy efficiency
label1 for A
Range A and B
shall have
significantly
different names.
Range A and B
shall have
significantly
different names.
MB shall have
different names
Range A and B
shall have
significantly
different names.
YES except
Eurovent certified
HRS
YES
Energy efficiency
label1 for A and B
YES
Energy efficiency
label1 for A and
ECP mark for B
YES
NO
AUTHORIZED
Energy efficiency
class and label for
B
AHU, OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 33 of 40
CASE
2 products A and B from the same
Eurovent certified range: they include
only components available in the
certified software except product B
includes a fan (or fans) not included in
the software
2 products A and B from the same
Eurovent certified range: they include
only components available in the
certified software except product B
includes a motor (or motors) not
included in the software
2 products A and B from the same
Eurovent certified range: they include
only components available in the
certified software except product B has a
mechanical construction not included in
the software
ARE ENERGY
COMPONENTS
THE SAME?
IS MECHANICAL
CONSTRUCTION
THE SAME?
MANDATORY
YES
Energy efficiency
label1 for A and
ECP mark for B
YES except
motor(s)
YES
Energy efficiency
label1 for A and B
YES
NO
AUTHORIZED
FORBIDDEN
COMMENTS
Energy efficiency
class and label for
B
This case is not allowed as all mechanical constructions for a certified range
shall be certified and available in the certified software.
Product with non certified mechanical construction shall carry a significantly
different range name from the certified range name
Note: Use of components not in the certified software shall remain exceptional. Energy class shall be consistent with the unit delivered to the
customer. Eurovent Certita Certification is entitled to ask a manufacturer to include a component in the software if it is observed that it this
component is used very often.
Preferably the graphical energy efficiency label shall be displayed. Otherwise the statement: Eurovent energy efficiency class X, must be announced. If the graphical energy
efficiency label is not used the Eurovent Certified Performance mark shall be displayed
1
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 34 of 40
OM-5,
Page No.
Major Non Compliance = Non-compliance which involves direct impact on the units finished product performance, and may
mis-lead the end user from the software output / product and marketing advertisment, or impacts on the completion of the 3A
Technical Form for ECC Real Unit test selection.
Any minor non-conformity identified during an on-site checking will be escalated to major if not resolved prior or during the next follow-up audit (IV.16 OM5)
Mis-use of ECC mark in portraying products / ranges to be certified when they are not, this also applies to branded products that have not been declared
P9/P14/P17
to ECC or tracability of the original ECC manufacturer has been removed, either software or unit.
Use of ECC mark: The participant is entitled to use the certification mark for the certified range in literature and on products, however it must be obvious
P9/P18
for which products the certification is granted. See also guidance in Certification Manual.
P14
4
5
6
P6/P13
Declaration of Certified Brand without prior knowledge / approval from ECC HQ.
P6/P16
P8
P11
9
10
11
P7
If it appears that different MB construction has been used during the factory audit to that supplied for the MB certification charateristics, then this is
deemed a failure and additional MB test shall be required.
Several production places: During the annual on-site checking (see IV.4), if there is any suspicion that the production place cannot ensure the same
performances as its 'sister' production places, then the auditor can issue a major non-compliances and ask for that a Real Unit and/or Model Box be
tested.
Software update record sheet not available for updated perfomance to existing components i.e DLL updates
P8
Software update record sheet must provide enough traceable information should differences exist during factory software checking
P5/P10/P11
12
P8/P9
13
P8
14
P8
15
P7/P9
16
P20
17
P15/P17
P11
Manufacturer not providng proof of ISO 9001 continuation after existing certification has lapsed.
Consistancy checks of Heat Recovery stand-alone ECC software or Real Unit component test to unit selection: NO unit selection software performance
can be higher than that of the stand-alone ECC software or outside the tolerance of the independent Heat Recovery test report.
Able to re-calculate the last Real Unit before removing the compoment from selection software, otherwise re-calculation can not be completed.
If moving to new software platform between the period when the Real Unit was selected & re-calculation, the same unit (all components) must be
selectable.
During the factory audit if it appears that different software has been used, then this shall be considered as a non-respect of procedures (see certification
manual)
Calculated Eurovent Certified Performance energy class is lower than the claimed energy class
If it is not allowed to display the energy class classification a statement shall be written e.g "Heat Recovery component -and/or fan selection beyond
certified software do not comply with Eurovent Certita Certification rules for Energy Class classification.," Refer to Table V.2 in OM-5 for heat recovery
systems & fan / electrical motors for when the energy classification can be used.
18
P16
Major Non Compliance = Non-compliance which involves direct impact on the units finished product performance, and may
mis-lead the end user from the software output / product and marketing advertisment, or impacts on the completion of the 3A
Technical Form for ECC Real Unit test selection.
Item
No.
OM-5,
Page No.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
P16
There must be only one active Eurovent Certified AHU software version
P16
If the software is able to export to other formats, then the key output selection requirements must exist eg. Software version, Project name etc
P16
All components must be described inside the software by a product key or relevant tracable information.
P16
P7/P16
P17
ECC energy efficiency Class i.e. 'A' must be on the first page (at least on one page)
P16
26
P16
Software must be able to calculate between the upper & lower operating conditions without changing components, software should provide user warning if
selection not possible.
27
P16
Software able to store & restore the selection details without alterations of the calculation.
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
P16
Heating & Cooling coil water inlet temperatures, water flow rate or water outlet temperatures. Supply air temp behind heating coil & outlet air temp &
relative humidity for cooling coil and supply air temp and humidity behind the cooler
On the First Page: Project name / Customer / Quote No./ Unit designation & Project selection date must be at a minimium on the first page.
On the first page: Eurovent Energy efficiency class. Preferably the graphical energy efficiency label shall be displayed. Otherwise the statement: Eurovent
P18
energy efficiency class X, must be announced. If the graphical energy efficiency label is not used the Eurovent Certified Performance mark shall be
displayed.
P18
On Each Page: Software name, version code, printout date, page numbering with total no. of pages (e.g. x of y)
Statement: "This component is not included in the software certified by Eurovent Certification", if a component, serving a certified performance, cannot be
P7/P17
selected within the certified software. This statement is not required for non-certified components that are not included in the software (e.g Filters,
Attenuators, Humidifiers, etc)
Technical Selection Print Output Data
P7/P17
P17
All data to calculate the Energy efficiency Class must be available from the data selection sheet.
P17
Velocity in cross-section of the filter section (or of the fan cros-section if no filter)
P17
Octave bands to be in (dB) and Outlet/Inlet & Airbourne Sound Power (dBA) of the unit
P17
If software not using standard 1.2kg/m3 air density, then actual air density must be provided on selection output
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 36 of 40
Major Non Compliance = Non-compliance which involves direct impact on the units finished product performance, and may
mis-lead the end user from the software output / product and marketing advertisment, or impacts on the completion of the 3A
Technical Form for ECC Real Unit test selection.
Item
No.
OM-5,
Page No.
40
P17
Design Winter outdoor air temperature and % factor of recirculation air (if applicable) must be declared on the selection printout or mentioned as design
inlet temperature for the first thermal component (heat recovery or heating component)
41
42
43
P17
External static pressure for the supply and extract unit (where applicable)
P17
Basic unit construction(same as Model Box), it is not necessary to include leakage class & deflection on the selection /quotation output
P18
Selected filter sections with filter type & class, pressure drops for Clean, Design & Dirty conditions (Energy class based on Design)
44
P18
Heat recovery system (HRS): Dry temperature efficiency (no condensation on extract side) of the HRS for the design winter operation @ equal mass flows
(extract flow equsl to design supply flow)
45
P18
46
P18
47
48
49
P18
P18
Fan & motor type including fan and motor data i.e. RPM, Input Power Absorbed Power, must be declared on selection output.
P18
Inverter power absorption not included in total active power absorbed of the unit when inverter is not fitted in factory but required to run unit
50
P18
Total static pressure values of actual unit configuration different to that declared on printout Total internal static pressure + external static pressure
(+possible system effect) but not including Dynamic pressure.
51
52
P17/P18
P33
Note:
All data to calculate the Energy efficiency Class must be available from the data selection sheet.
If unit called same for certified & non-certified with different components (unit must have different range name!)
The above list is not absolute and at the auditors discretion based on the definition of "major" non-compliance this will be included in the audit assessment
Notes: Some of these items may have also been listed on the 'minor' non-compliance list, however they will be considered as a 'major' non-compliance should they not be resolved during the n+1 audit
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 37 of 40
OM-5,
Page
No.
P7
2
3
4
P19
Software update record sheet not provided to ECC HQ for additional component additions or other updates within Software excluding performance changes
to certified scope
Incorrect design of ECC Mark used on any documentation as detailed in the certification manual (VI.2), this also includes color of mark
P15
If the participant has chosen to fit the energy efficiency class to the units even the one with class <E must be fitted.
P17
Filter pressure drop is missing on software print out, however tracable in software audit check
P18
6
7
8
9
10
11
P18
If selection design is based on WET fan condition and the energy class is calculated correctly based on the WET pressure drop of the internal static pressure,
but NO note can be found on Fan selection output designed for WET conditions.
The middle-life filter pressure drop is not the average between clean and final filter pressure drop. EN13053 6.9.2
P17
P17
Software name / Version and printout date displayed on each page of the selection output with page numbering.
P17
Project name / Customer / Quote No./ Unit designation & Project selection date must be at a minimium on the first page.
P17
If Energy Efficiency class is provided on selection output but not on the first page
P17
Software version number required on DWG (not created by Software) to customer that includes selection output data.
The above list is not absolute and at the auditors discretion based on the definition of "minor" non-compliance this will be included in the audit assessment
Note:
Minor Non Compliance = which does not involve a direct impact on the units finished product performance, and does not mislead
the end user from the Software output / product and marketing advertisment, or does not impact on the audit completion.
Notes: Some of these items may have also been listed on the 'major' non-compliance list, however they will be considered on the first occasion as a 'minor' non-compliance
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 38 of 40
APPENDIX F.
material: steal/aluminium/plastic
shape (see pictures):
thickness of the material
with/without thermal break
F.II. Mullion
material: steal/aluminium/plastic
shape (see pictures):
thickness of the material
with/without thermal break
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 39 of 40
F.III.Filter construction
OM-5-2015
Issued January 2015
Page 40 of 40