You are on page 1of 2

5806 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

23 / Friday, February 3, 2006 / Notices

DATES: The meeting will be held March must be received at Land Between the 3. The Responsible Official who will
2, 2006, beginning at 1:30 p.m. and Lakes by February 20, 2006, in order for approve the final plan will be the Forest
ending at 4 p.m. copies to be provided to the members at Supervisor instead of the Regional
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the meeting. Board members will review Forester.
the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 written comments received, and at their 4. The Forest will establish an
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA request, oral clarification may be Environmental Management System
96150. requested at a future meeting. (EMS) (per ISO 14001:2004(E)) prior to
DATE: The meeting will be held on approval of the revised forest plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
February 28, 2006, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., 5. The emphasis of public
Terri Marceron or Arla Hains, lake involvement will be a collaborative
Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Forest CST.
effort between the public and the Forest
Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Service to incorporate the most
Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 543–2773. the Stewart County Public Library, desirable management options into a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to Dover, TN, and will be open to the single broadly supported management
be covered on the agenda include: (1) public. direction package that will become the
Tahoe Working Group Report; (2) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: forest plan.
Update on Erosion Control Grants; and, Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, 6. Administrative review will change
(3) Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe Land Between the Lakes, 100 Van from a post-decision appeals process to
Basin Federal Advisory Committee Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky a pre-decision objection process.
meetings are open to the public. 42211, 270–924–2002. 7. Because the Forest will not be
Interested citizens are encouraged to preparing an Environmental Impact
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
attend at the above address. Issues may Statement (EIS) for revision of the forest
be brought to the attention of the Dated: January 20, 2006. plan, interim management strategies
Committee during the open public William P. Lisowsky, will be developed for the fourteen river
comment period at the meeting or by Area Supervisor, Land Between the Lakes. segments identified as eligible for
filing written statements with the inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River
secretary for the Committee before or [FR Doc. E6–1469 Filed 2–2–06; 8:45 am] (WSR) System. The suitability of these
after the meeting. Please refer any BILLING CODE 3410–11–P river segments for inclusion in the WSR
written comments to the Lake Tahoe System will be addressed in an
Basin Management Unit at the contact appropriate environmental document
address stated above. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE after the revised forest plan is approved.
Terri Marceron, 8. Because an environmental impact
Forest Service statement will not be prepared for this
Forest Supervisor.
Manti-La Sal National Forest Land and revision, oil and gas leasing decisions
[FR Doc. 06–1000 Filed 2–2–06; 8:45 am]
Resource Management Plan Revision will not be made. Instead, the revised
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
forest plan will include general
Manti-La Sal National Forest in Utah, guidelines for mineral operations,
Juab, Emery, Carbon, Sanpete, Grand, including oil and gas, which will be
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
San Juan and Sevier counties in Utah, considered as appropriate for areas
Forest Service and Mesa and Montrose counties in currently available for leasing to protect
Colorado. resource values while providing
Meeting of the Land Between the AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. appropriate access for exploration and
Lakes Advisory Board development activities. Decisions
ACTION: Notice of Adjustment to Federal regarding areas administratively
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Register Notice Vol. 67, No. 86, p. available for lease and lease stipulations
ACTION: Notice of meeting. 22397, May 3, 2002, and Vol. 69, No. will be addressed in a separate
205, p. 62244, October 25, 2004, and environmental document(s) prepared
SUMMARY: The Land Between the Lakes transition to the 2005 Planning Rule at either concurrently with the revision
Advisory Board will hold a meeting on 36 CFR 219 (FR, Vol. 70, No. 3. / process or following approval of the
Tuesday, February 28, 2006. Notice of January 5, 2005, 1023). revised forest plan.
this meeting is given under the Federal
SUMMARY: The Manti-La Sal National Public Involvement: Public
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
Forest (Forest) will exercise its option to participation and collaboration
2.
adjust the land management plan (including more than 34 public
The meeting agenda includes the
revision process from compliance with meetings) has been ongoing. Current
following:
the 1982 planning regulations, to information and details of public
(1) Welcome/Introductions/Agenda.
conform to new planning regulations participation opportunities are posted
(2) Appreciative Inquiry Session
adopted in January 2005. This on the Forest Web site at http://
about LBL/Environmental Education.
(3) Land and Resource Management adjustment will have the following www.fs.fed.us/r4/mantilasal/projects.
Plan. effects: Contact Linda Crawley at (435) 636–
(4) LBL Updates. 1. The 2005 Planning Rule redefines 3558, or e-mail lcrawley@fs.fed.us to be
(5) Board Discussion of Comments forest plans to be more strategic and added to the forest plan revision mailing
Received. flexible to better facilitate adaptive list.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

The meeting is open to the public. management and public collaboration. ADDRESSES: Manti-La Sal National
Written comments are invited and may 2. The 2005 Planning Rule focuses Forest, 599 W. Price River Dr., Price, UT
be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area more on the goals of ecological, social, 84501.
Supervisor, Land Between the Lakes, and economic sustainability and less on FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, prescriptive means of producing goods Marlene DePietro, Planning and
Kentucky 42211. Written comments and services. Recreation Group Leader, Manti-La Sal

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:55 Feb 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2006 / Notices 5807

National Forest, phone (435) 636–3539 the Forest’s Rapid Assessment (March Room 5818, South Building,
or email: mdepietro@fs.fed.us. 2005), Fire Regime Condition Class Washington, DC 20250–1522.
DATES: Transition is effective Assessment (February 2005), and Telephone: (202) 720–0784. Fax: (202)
immediately upon publication of this various resource specialist white papers 720–8435.
notice in the Federal Register. will serve as the Forest’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
Responsible Official: Alice B. Carlton, Comprehensive Evaluation Report. of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Forest Supervisor, Manti-La Sal Additional opportunities will be regulation (5 CFR 1320) implementing
National Forest, 599 W. Price River Dr., provided for the public to review provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Price, UT 84501. intermediate products, provide Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) requires
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 3,
comment, or participate in collaborative that interested members of the public
2002, the Manti-La Sal National Forest stakeholder activities. The focal points and affected agencies have an
published a Notice of Intent to revise of future collaborative work will be: (1) opportunity to comment on information
the Land and Resource Management Review of revised desired conditions, collection and recordkeeping activities
Plan (Forest Plan) (FR Vol. 67, No. 86, (2) identification and development of [see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. This notice
p. 22397, May 3, 2002). This notice objectives to aid in attaining or identifies information collections that
initiated revision under the 1982 maintaining desired conditions, (3) RUS is submitting to OMB for
planning regulations, but advised the review of suitable land uses, (4) extension.
public that the Forest would seriously development and review of design Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
consider switching to the new planning criteria, and (5) development and this collection of information is
regulations once they were finalized review of the plan monitoring necessary for the proper performance of
This notice also outlined the initial framework. This phase of collaboration the functions of the agency, including
steps of the revision process including should be completed by the spring of whether the information will have
gathering information, organizing the 2006. The remaining forest plan revision practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
revision team, developing resource schedule will be approximately as agency’s estimate of the burden of the
inventories, and establishing a mailing follows: collection of information including the
list. Draft Environmental Man- Spring 2006. validity of the methodology and
During 2002 and 2003, cooperating agement System. assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
Release of Proposed Forest Summer the quality, utility, and clarity of the
agency status was established through
Plan and start of 90-day 2006.
Memorandums of Understanding with information to be collected; and (d)
public comment period.
six of the ten counties within which the Release of Final Plan and Fall 2006. ways to minimize the burden of the
Forest lies. Ten meetings were held start of 30-day objection collection of information on
throughout central and southeastern period. respondents, including through the use
Utah (February to March 2003) to Final decision and start of Winter 2006. of appropriate automated, electronic,
explain the planning process and to plan implementation. mechanical or other technological
discuss existing uses of the Forest and collection techniques or other forms of
Dated: January 30, 2006. information technology. Comments may
current management issues. Nine public
meetings were held in May 2004 to Rod Player, be sent to Richard C. Annan, Director,
discuss preliminary needs for change in Acting Forest Supervisor, Manti-La Sal Program Development and Regulatory
the current Forest Plan, Wild and Scenic National Forest. Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, U.S.
Rivers eligibility and suitability, and the [FR Doc. E6–1465 Filed 2–2–06; 8:45 am] Department of Agriculture, STOP 1522,
inventory of undeveloped and unroaded BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
areas. Washington, DC 20250–1522. Fax: (202)
On October 25, 2004, the Forest 720–0784.
formally initiated the land management DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Title: Review Rating Summary, RUS
plan revision process with release of a Form 300.
Preliminary Analysis of the Rural Utilities Service OMB Control Number: 0572–0025.
Management Situation and publication Information Collection Activity; Type of Request: Extension of a
of a Notice of Intent to prepare an Comment Request currently approved collection.
environmental impact statement for Abstract: The RUS manages loan
plan revision (FR Vol. 69, No. 205, p. Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
AGENCY: programs in accordance with the RE Act
62244). Six open houses were held Notice and request for
ACTION: of 1936, as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 et
during November 2004 to discuss the comments. seq.). An important part of safeguarding
Preliminary Analysis of the loan security is to see that RUS financed
Management Situation and the Notice of SUMMARY: In accordance with the facilities are being responsibly used,
Intent. These documents focused the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 adequately operated, and adequately
revision process on those areas of the U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended), the maintained. Future needs have to be
Forest where clearer management Rural Utilities Service (RUS) invites anticipated to ensure that facilities will
direction is most needed at this time. comments on the following information continue to produce revenue and that
During September 2005, two collections for which RUS intends to loans will be repaid as required by the
workshops and an open house were request approval from the Office of RUS mortgage. A periodic operations
held to discuss desired conditions for Management and Budget (OMB). and maintenance (O&M) review, using
the Forest. Six workshops were held DATES: Comments on this notice must be the RUS Form 300, in accordance with
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

during November 2005 to review received by April 4, 2006. 7 CFR part 1730, is an effective means
current Forest inventories and discuss FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: for RUS to determine whether the
suitable uses on the Forest. Richard C. Annan, Director, Program borrowers systems are being properly
To meet the requirements of the 2005 Development and Regulatory Analysis, operated and maintained, thereby
Planning Rule, the 2004 Analysis of the Rural Utilities Service, 1400 protecting the loan collateral. An O&M
Management Situation, combined with Independence Ave., SW., STOP 1522, review is also used to rate facilities and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:00 Feb 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1

You might also like