Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.597 OF 2010
SUSHIL ANSAL
.....APPELLANT
VERSUS
..RESPONDENT
WITH
.....APPELLANT
VERSUS
..RESPONDENT
WITH
APPELLANT
VERSUS
..RESPONDENT
WITH
Page1
JUDGMENT
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.597 AND 598 OF 2010
1.
Page2
Page3
Page4
5.
Page5
Page6
concerned.
The
representatives
of
the
Page7
9.
Page8
premises, were aware of the fact that one exit had been
closed due to addition of seats and change in the layout of
the seats and the said fact could have exposed the
spectators
to
the
risk
they
actually
faced,
which
Page9
10
So far
perhaps
rightly
thought
about
imposing
Page10
11
Shri
Ram
Jethmalani,
learned
senior
counsel,
Page11
12
should
neither
be
excessively
harsh
nor
ridiculously low.
Page12
13
17.
In the
Page13
14
Page14
15
Page15
16
Page16
17
August, 2015, but since the Court time was almost over,
we have now given the reasons for the said order.
................................J.
(ANIL R. DAVE)
................................J.
(KURIAN JOSEPH)
...............................J.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)
NEW DELHI
SEPTEMBER 22, 2015
Page17