Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Bell Lunsford, Public Affairs
Officer, USDA, Homochitto National
Forest, 1200 Hwy. 184 East, Meadville,
MS 39653 (601–384–5876).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff, Committee
members and elected officials. However,
persons who wish to bring matters to
the attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff before or after the meeting. A
public input session will be provided
and individuals who made written
requests by February 21, 2006, will have
the opportunity to address the
committee at that session. Individuals
wishing to speak or propose agenda
items must send their names and
proposals to Tim Reed, District Ranger,
DFO, 1200 Hwy. 184 East, Meadville,
MS 39653.
Dated: January 13, 2006.
Tim Reed,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–606 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Lincoln County Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Public Law 92–463) and under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public
Law 106–393) the Kootenai National
Forest’s Lincoln County Resource
Advisory Committee will meet on
Wednesday February 1, 2006 at 6 p.m.
at the Forest Supervisor’s Office in
Libby, Montana for a business meeting.
The meeting is open to the public.
DATES: February 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor’s Office,
1101 U.S. Hwy. 2 West, Libby, Montana.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Edgmon, Committee
Coordinator, Kootenai National Forest at
(406) 283–7764, or e-mail
bedgmon@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
topics include status of approved
projects, plan for receiving and
approving proposals for 2007, and
receiving public comment. If the
meeting date or location is changed,
notice will be posted in the local
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001
3821
newspapers, including the daily
Interlake based in Kalispell, Montana.
Dated: January 17, 2006.
Bob Castaneda,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–615 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notice of Solicitation for Sea Grant
Review Panelists
AGENCY: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Office of
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
(OAR) National Sea Grant Review Panel.
SUMMARY: This notice responds to the
National Sea Grant College Program Act,
at 33 U.S.C. 1128, which requires the
Secretary of Commerce to solicit
nominations at least once a year for
membership on the Sea Grant Review
Panel. This advisory committee
provides advice on the implementation
of the National Sea Grant College
Program.
DATES: Resumes should be sent to the
address specified and must be received
by 30 days from publication.
ADDRESSES: Dr. Leon M. Cammen,
Interim Executive Director; National Sea
Grant College Program; 1315 East-West
Highway, Room 11841; Silver Spring,
Maryland 20910
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Leon M. Cammen of the National Sea
Grant College Program at the address
given above; telephone (301) 713–2435
extension 136 or fax number (301) 713–
0799.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
209 of the Act establishes a Sea Grant
Review Panel to advise the Secretary of
Commerce, the Under Secretary for
Oceans and Atmosphere, and the
Director of the National Sea Grant
College Program on the implementation
of the Sea Grant Program. The panel
provides advice on such matters as:
(a) The Sea Grant Fellowship
Program;
(b) Applications or proposals for, and
performance under, grants and contracts
awarded under the Sea Grant Program
Improvement Act of 1976, as amended
at 33 U.S.C. 1124;
(c) The designation and operation of
sea grant colleges and sea grant
institutes; and the operation of the sea
grant program;
(d) The formulation and application
of the planning guidelines and priorities
under 33 U.S.C. 1123 (a) and (c)(1); and
(e) Such other matters as the Secretary
refers to the panel for review and
advice.
PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
The Panel is to consist of 15 voting
members composed as follows: Not less
than eight of the voting members of the
panel should be individuals who, by
reason of knowledge, experience, or
training, are especially qualified in one
or more of the disciplines and fields
included in marine science. The other
voting members shall be individuals
who by reason of knowledge,
experience, or training, are especially
qualified in, or representative of,
education, extension service, state
government, industry, economics,
planning, or any other activity which is
appropriate to, and important for, any
effort to enhance the understanding,
assessment, development, utilization, or
conservation of ocean and coastal
resources. No individual is eligible to be
a voting member of the panel if the
individual is (a) the director of a sea
grant college, sea grant regional
consortium, or sea grant program, (b) an
applicant for or beneficiary (as
determined by the Secretary) of any
grant or contract under 33 U.S.C. 1124
or (c) a full-time officer or employee of
the United States. The Director of the
National Sea Grant College Program and
one Director of a Sea Grant Program also
serve as non-voting members. Panel
members are appointed for a 4-year
term.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and
Atmospheric Research.
[FR Doc. E6–830 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Transportation and Related Equipment
Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
of Open Meeting
The Transportation and Related
Equipment Technical Advisory
Committee will meet on February 9,
2006, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C.
Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th
Street between Pennsylvania and
Constitution Avenues, NW.,
Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration
with respect to technical questions that
affect the level of export controls
applicable to transportation and related
equipment or technology.
Agenda
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Review of Bureau issues of
significance to TRANSTAC members.
24JAN1
 3822 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Notices
3. Regulatory overview.
4. Policy overview.
5. Missile Technology Control
Regime.
6. Wassenaar proposal status.
7. Jurisdiction technical working
group report.
8. Presentation of papers and
comments by the public.
9. Follow-up on open action items.
The meeting will be open to the
public and a limited number of seats
will be available. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent time permits,
members of the public may present oral
statements to the Committee. Written
statements may be submitted at any
time before or after the meeting.
However, to facilitate distribution of
public presentation materials to
Committee members, the Committee
suggests that presenters forward the
public presentation materials to Yvette
Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. For
more information contact Ms. Springer
on (202) 482–4814.
Dated: January 17, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–589 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–122–840)
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Carbon
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 20, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of its second administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod from Canada. The review covers two
producers of the subject merchandise,
Ivaco Inc. and Ivaco Rolling Mills (IRM)
(collectively, ‘‘Ivaco’’) and Ispat Sidbec,
Inc. (Ispat) (now known as Mittal
Canada Inc. (Mittal)1). The period of
review (POR) is October 1, 2003,
through September 30, 2004. Based on
our analysis of comments received,
these final results differ from the
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
1 On June 24, 2005, we determined that Mittal
was the successor-in-interest to Ispat Sidbec, Inc.
See Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon
and Certain Steel Alloy Wire Rod from Canada, 70
FR 39484 (July 8, 2005).
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:44 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001
preliminary results. The final results are
listed below in the Final Results of
Review section.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Salim Bhabhrawala or David Neubacher,
at (202) 482–1784 or (202) 482–5823,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 20, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the second
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada.
See Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Carbon and Certain Steel Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 70 FR
41681 (July 20, 2005) (Preliminary
Results).
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On August 29,
2005, we received case briefs from the
respondents, Ivaco and Ispat, and the
petitioners, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc.,
ISG Georgetown Inc., Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc., and North
Star Steel Texas, Inc. All parties
submitted rebuttal briefs on September
9, 2005. No public hearing was
requested.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain hot–rolled products of carbon
steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above–noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and
(e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods.
Also excluded are (f) free machining
steel products (i.e., products that
contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. Grade 1080 tire cord quality rod is
PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or
more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
Grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is
defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or
more but not more than 7.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5
or fewer breaks per ton; and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of soluble aluminum,
(3) 0.040 percent or less, in the
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4)
0.008 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5)
either not more than 0.15 percent, in the
aggregate, of copper, nickel and
chromium (if chromium is not
specified), or not more than 0.10 percent
in the aggregate of copper and nickel
and a chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30
percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod and grade 1080 tire
bead quality wire rod, an inclusion will
be considered to be deformable if its
ratio of length (measured along the axis
– that is, the direction of rolling – of the
rod) over thickness (measured on the
same inclusion in a direction
perpendicular to the axis of the rod) is
24JAN1