Professional Documents
Culture Documents
72
Page
1
2
3
4
Anti-lock brakes, a standard feature in most cars, are a basic form of driverless technology.
2008 HowStuffWorks
sending the car into an out-of-control skid. In a car without anti-lock brakes, the driver has to pump
the brake pedal to keep the wheels from locking up. With anti-lock brakes, the system does the pumping
for the driver -- and does it better than the driver. The system can read the wheels and knows when they
are about to lock and react faster and with a more appropriate response than a driver could. Anti-lock
brakes are one of the first technologies that take cars in a driverless direction.
Another type of driverless system is traction or stability control. These systems are so transparent that
usually only professional drivers recognize when they've taken control. Like anti-lock brakes, traction and
stability control react better than a driver ever could. Unlike anti-lock brakes, these systems are very
complicated and use multiple systems within the car to keep the driver from losing control.
Stability and traction control are systems that can detect when a car might go into an out-of-control skid or
roll over and work to prevent that from happening. The systems are constantly reading the car's direction,
speed and how well each wheel is connecting to the road. When it detects the car going out of control or
starting to roll, stability or traction control will step in. Unlike a driver, these systems can apply brakes and
increase or decrease power to individual wheels, which is often better than brakes or power being applied
to all four wheels. When working properly, the system gives just the right response, unlike drivers, who
often over-correct during emergency maneuvers.
Continue reading to learn about the more sci-fi driverless car tech already on the road.
THE DARPA URBAN CHALLENGE
Some of this future driverless car tech may be closer than you think. The DARPA (Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency) Urban Challenge pits teams against each other to create cars that can
negotiate traffic autonomously. The goal of the program isn't just to reduce traffic accidents and
congestion, however: it's to produce driverless vehicles for combat, keeping soldiers far from the front
lines.
72
Page
1
2
3
4
Cruise control is a basic driverless system. Adaptive cruise control falls closer to the sci-fi end of the spectrum.
Ye Liew/Dreamstime.com
55 miles per hour, adaptive cruise control will automatically decrease your car's speed and maintain a
safe distance between the two cars.
Want to go even further into the future? Head to the next page to learn about cars that can park
themselves
72
Page
2
3
4
5
HSW 2008
Self-parking Cars
It's probably a good guess that if you've damaged a car, it wasn't in a big accident but in a little parking
fender bender. Parking is probably the least dangerous thing people can do in a car, but we still manage
to mess it up anyway. Though some carmakers have put in rearview cameras, sensors that tell drivers
how close they are to surrounding objects -- and even computer generated 360-degree views of the car -people still manage to scrape, ding and dent their way into parking spaces.
Drivers of the Lexus LS 460 L who opt for the car's Advance Parking Guidance System don't have
those problems, though. The system uses sensors all around the car to guide it into a parallel parking
space (yes, that means the driver takes his or her hands off the wheel and feet off the pedal). Of course,
the system isn't ready for a cameo on "Star Trek" just yet. Before it can work, the driver has to find a
parking space, position the car next to it, and use the in-cabin navigation screen to tell the car where it
should go. Also, the parking space needs to be 6 feet (1.8 meters) longer than the car (and the LS isn't a
short car). Still, the self-parking system is a big achievement in driverless car technology. With it, the car
behaves like a driver might -- reading the area around it, reacting accordingly and going safely from point
A to point B. While it's not the same as sitting back and relaxing while your car drives you home for the
night, it's the first step in that direction.
The next move in driverless car technology may be just around the corner. In fact, some carmakers hope
to have driverless cars on the road by 2018. Read on to find out what technology is needed and how it will
be applied.
The idea of a driverless car is nothing new. From the Batmobile to KITT, cars that can operate on their
own have captured people's imaginations. The technology for bringing theses cars to reality isn't as far off
as you might think.
72
Page
4
5
6
7
HSW 2008
72
Page
4
5
6
7
Urban Light Transport is a revolutionary driverless taxicab. It's yet to be seen whether the masses will place trust in
driverless cars.
ATS Ltd/BWP Media/Getty Images
To learn more about driverless cars and driverless systems, look over the links on the next page.
"I WASN'T SPEEDING, OFFICER. MY CAR WAS."
Another issue that needs to be worked out before driverless cars are widespread is what happens when
the car makes an error. Should a driver be penalized because his or her car malfunctioned?
72
Page
4
5
6
7
Ashley, Steven. "Smart Cars and Automated Highways" Mechanical Engineering Magazine. May,
1998. http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/membersonly/may98/features/smarter/smarter.html
Greene, Kate. "Stanford's New Driverless Car." Technology Review. June 15, 2007.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/18908/?a=f
Squatriglia, Chuck. "GM Says Driverless Cars Could Be on the Road by 2018." Wired Magazine.
January 7, 2008. http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/01/gm-says-driverl.html
Strauss, Eric. "CES 2008: A Driverless SUV Gives Tour of the Future." ABC News.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GadgetGuide/story?id=4101838
Tierney, John. "In the Future, Smart People Will Let Their Cars Take Control." The New York
Times. December 4, 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/science/04tier.html
Trillan, Calvin. "Park, He Said." The New York Times. January 26, 2007.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/26/opinion/26trillin.html
Print
Cite
Feedback
Toyota Prius modified to operate as a Google driverless car driving a test course. [1]
The Google driverless car is a project by Google that involves developing technology for autonomous cars.
The project is currently being led by Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, director of the Stanford Artificial
Intelligence Laboratory and co-inventor ofGoogle Street View. Thrun's team at Stanford created the robotic
vehicle Stanley which won the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge and its US$2 million prize from the United States
Department of Defense.[2] The team developing the system consisted of 15 engineers working for Google,
including Chris Urmson, Mike Montemerlo, and Anthony Levandowski who had worked on the DARPA Grand
and Urban Challenges.[3]
The U.S. state of Nevada passed a law on June 29, 2011 permitting the operation of autonomous cars in
Nevada. Google had been lobbying for robotic car laws. [4][5][6] The Nevada law went into effect on March 1,
2012, and the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles issued the first license for an autonomous car in May
2012. The license was issued to a Toyota Prius modified with Google's experimental driverless technology.[7] As
of April 2012, Florida became the second state to allow the testing of autonomous cars on public roads.
[8]
California became the third state to legalize the use of self-driven cars for testing purposes as of September
2012 when Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill into law at Google HQ in Mountain View.[9]
Contents
[hide]
1 Road testing
1.1 Incidents
2 Commercialization
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
Road testing[edit]
The project team has equipped a test fleet of at least ten vehicles, consisting of six Toyota Prius, an Audi TT,
and three Lexus RX450h,[10] each accompanied in the driver's seat by one of a dozen drivers with unblemished
driving records and in the passenger seat by one of Google's engineers. The car has traversed San
Francisco's Lombard Street, famed for its steep hairpin turns and through city traffic. The vehicles have driven
over the Golden Gate Bridge and on the Lake Tahoe.[3] The system drives at the speed limit it has stored on its
maps and maintains its distance from other vehicles using its system of sensors. The system provides an
override that allows a human driver to take control of the car by stepping on the brake or turning the wheel,
similar to cruise control systems already found in many cars today.[2][11]
On March 28, 2012, Google posted a YouTube video showing a Morgan Hill, California resident, Steve Mahan
being taken on a ride in its self-driving Toyota Prius. In the video, Mahan states "Ninety-five percent of my
vision is gone, I'm well past legally blind". In the description of the YouTube video, it is noted that the carefully
programmed route takes him from his home to a drive-through restaurant, then to the dry cleaning shop, and
finally back home.[12][13]
In August 2012, the team announced that they have completed over 300,000 autonomous-driving miles (500
000 km) accident-free, typically have about a dozen cars on the road at any given time, and are starting to test
them with single drivers instead of in pairs.[14] Three U.S. states have passed laws permitting autonomous
cars as of September 2012: Nevada, Florida, and California.[15] A law proposed in Texas would establish criteria
for allowing "autonomous motor vehicles".[16][17]
Incidents[edit]
In August 2011, a human-controlled Google driverless car was involved in the project's first crash near Google
headquarters in Mountain View, CA. Google has stated that the car was being driven manually at the time of
the accident.[18] A previous incident involved a Google driverless car being rear-ended while stopped at a
trafficlight.[19]
Commercialization[edit]
While Google had no immediate plans to commercially develop the system, the company hopes to develop a
business which would market the system and the data behind it to automobile manufacturers. An attorney for
the California Department of Motor Vehicles raised concerns that "The technology is ahead of the law in many
areas," citing state laws that "all presume to have a human being operating the vehicle". [2] According to The
New York Times, policy makers and regulators have argued that new laws will be required if driverless vehicles
are to become a reality because "the technology is now advancing so quickly that it is in danger of outstripping
existing law, some of which dates back to the era of horse-drawn carriages". [6]
Google lobbied for two bills that made Nevada the first state where autonomous vehicles can be legally
operated on public roads. The first bill is an amendment to an electric vehicle bill that provides for the licensing
and testing of autonomous vehicles. The second bill will provide an exemption from the ban on distracted
driving to permit occupants to send text messages while sitting behind the wheel. The two bills came to a vote
before the Nevada state legislatures session ended in June 2011. It has been speculated that Nevada was
selected due to the Las Vegas Auto Show and the Consumer Electronics Show, and the high likelihood that
Google will present the first commercially viable product at either or both of these events. Google executives,
however, refused to state the precise reason they chose Nevada to be the maiden state for the autonomous
car.[6]
Nevada passed a law in June 2011 concerning the operation of autonomous cars in Nevada,
[4][5][6]
which went
[7]
into effect on March 1, 2012. A Toyota Prius modified with Google's experimental driverless technology was
licensed by the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in May 2012. This was the first license issue in
the United States for a self-driven car.[7] License plates issued in Nevada for autonomous cars will have a red
background and feature an infinity symbol () on the left side because, according to the DMV
Director, "...using the infinity symbol was the best way to represent the 'car of the future'."
[11]
Nevada's
regulations require a person behind the wheel and one in the passengers seat during tests.
Google's robotic test cars have about $150,000 in equipment including a $70,000 LIDAR (laser radar) system.
[20]
Odometry is the use of data from moving sensors to estimate change in position over time. Odometry is used
by some robots, whether they be legged or wheeled, to estimate (not determine) their position relative to a
starting location. This method is sensitive to errors due to the integration of velocity measurements over time to
give position estimates. Rapid and accurate data collection, equipment calibration, and processing are required
in most cases for odometry to be used effectively.
The word odometry is composed from the Greek words hodos (meaning "travel", "journey")
and metron (meaning "measure").