Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
3 The Missing Headlines
4 Israel as Second-Class UN Citizen
5 Dashed Hopes
6 Anti-Israel Bias By the Numbers
9 The UN Human Rights Council
10 Geographically Incorrect
12 What Can Be Done?
codesis widespread.
I SOMETIMES FELT
LIKE I WAS ON THE
GAME SHOW 1 VS.
100. ALMOST EVERY
DAY I FELT ITIM
TALKING ABOUT
INSTITUTIONALIZED
DISCRIMINATION.
RON PROSOR, PERMANENT
REPRESENTATIVE OF ISRAEL
TO THE UNITED NATIONS
(2011-2015)
DASHED HOPES
The irony is startling. Created in 1945 in the wake of
World War II and the Holocaust in which six million
Jews were annihilated; propelled by the vision of
world peace first set forth by the Hebrew prophets;
even inscribing the words of Isaiah on a wall outside
its headquartersThey will break their swords into
plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks.
Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor
will they learn war anymorethe UN has become
a major fount of hatred toward the worlds only
Jewish state.
CROWDS IN TEL AVIV CELEBRATE THE UNS VOTE FOR
PARTITION IN 1947.
65%
120
Non-Aligned Movement
57
Organization of Islamic Cooperation
21
Arab League
This tilt against Israel carries over to the UN Security Council as well.
While the veto power that the U.S. wields has prevented a number of
anti-Israel resolutions from passing, the balance of forces in the Security
Council has ensured that not one resolution critical of Arab attacks on
Israel has ever passed in that body.
The strong anti-Israel bias at the UN has also led to the creation of
numerous pro-Palestinian bodies within it that simply do not exist for
any other group. The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable
Rights of the Palestinian People is the only General Assembly committee
devoted to a single people. The Division for Palestinian Rights is the
only division within the UN Secretariats Department of Political Affairs
devoted to a single people. And the Special Committee to Investigate
Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People
is the only committee in the UNs human rights structure devoted to a
single people.
Another glaring example of bias is the UN treatment of refugees. While
the UN High Commissioner for Refugees is assigned to handle the needs
of all the worlds refugees, a separate organization, the UN Relief and
Works Agency (UNRWA), deals only with Palestinians. And thats not
allthose Palestinian refugees are treated differently than the others.
For one thing, while the High Commissioners portfolio includes only
people who have fled their homeland, UNRWAs also includes the
descendants of persons who became refugees in 1948, so that the
original 860,000 Palestinian refugees have mushroomed into five
million. Also, part of the High Commissioner mandate is to help resettle
refugees, whereas UNRWA leaves its clients stateless, living in camps
throughout the Middle East. Indeed, there is strong evidence indicating
that UNRWA schools in those camps teach children hatred of Israel.
To its great credit, the U.S. government has spoken out eloquently
against the UNHRCs treatment of Israel. In March 2013 it sent a
letter to the Councils president complaining about the blatantly
unfair treatment that one UN member state receives in this body. The
legitimacy of this Council will remain in question as long as one country
is unfairly and uniquely singled out under its own agenda item. In
both 2014 and 2015 the U.S. delegation to the UNHRC manifested its
opposition to the focus on Israel by refraining from participation in the
discussion of Item 7. The EU has also agreed not to speak under this
agenda item.
The hypocrisy of the Councils fixation on Israel becomes even more
apparent from a scrutiny of the list of its members. Among the 47
states chosen to enforce the human-rights ideals of the UN are such
less-than-perfect paragons of those rights as China, Cuba, Qatar,
Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela.
Israel, the object of their repeated censure, and, unlike them, a westernstyle democracy, has never served on the UNHRC, and is unlikely to do so
for the foreseeable future. In fact Israel has never served on the Security
Council or on the other UN specialized agencies. The reason for this
reveals yet another aspect of the UNs mistreatment of the Jewish state.
ALL OTHER
NATIONS
COMBINED
61 ISSUED TO
ISRAEL
Methodology: includes all resolutions from 2006 to 2015 that singled out specific countries for
condemnation under agenda items 4 and 7. Excludes resolutions that also praise the country
concerned, or thoseadopted as matters oftechnical cooperation. Source: UNWatch
GEOGRAPHICALLY INCORRECT
MEMBERSHIP ON THE UNS VARIOUS committees
it, and so Israel for many years was the only country
majority at the UN will come to an end anytime soon. But there are four
concrete steps the UN can take to furnish a more level playing field for
the Jewish state:
1 Eliminate the anomalous UN entities that target only Israel
the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the
Palestinian People; the Division for Palestinian Rights; and the
Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the
Human Rights of the Palestinian People.
2 If it proves politically impossible to dissolve UNRWA and place
Palestinian refugees under the aegis of the High Commissioner for
Refugees, at least task UNRWA with resettling the Palestinians, and
monitoring its schools so that they do not teach hatred.
3 Do away with the UNHRCs Agenda Item 7, and address charges of
Israeli violations of human rights under Item 4, together with those
charged against other nations.
4 Grant Israel permanent membership in a UN regional group
at all UN offices around the world.
AJC Mission:
To enhance the well-being of the
Jewish people and Israel, and to advance
human rights and democratic values
around the world
AJC.org
facebook.com/ajcglobal
@AJCGlobal