Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FF = 0.33
(1)
where i 1, 2, and 3 are used to represent 0.92, 2.45, and 5.8 GHz,
respectively.
L1
L2
L3
L4
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Range
(mm)
39
0.5 5
0.5 5
0.5 5
48
0.2 1.5
16
8 10
2 12.5
Parameter
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
W7
Values
(mm)
8.7
2.3
1.4
3.8
1.5
5.4
0.6
12.5
3.8
30
L4
W5
W4
L5
30
W6
2.5
4
2
1.5
0.6
13
0.5
0.5
0.5
er = 4.4
L6 4
L3
y
L2
4.8
L1
ground
W7
W3
W1
W2
11.6
0.5
1.6
0
5
10
15
20
fitness value
0.92 GHz
2.45 GHz
5.8 GHz
25
30
1
unit: mm
5
6
iterations
10
Fig. 2 Progress of ISPO method with tness function value and results of
return loss at 0.92, 2.45, 5.8 GHz, respectively
G S G
h = 1.52
Fig. 1 Geometry of proposed tri-band antenna (top view and side view)
To optimise the antenna input impedance within the targeted frequency bands simultaneously, the geometric congurations of the
slots are determined using the ISPO algorithm. The ISPO method is
based on an analogy with models of the social behaviour of groups of
simple individuals, and it is a method specialised for solving complicated multidimensional problems [5]. Using this algorithm, each potential solution is represented as a particle with a velocity vector and a
position vector, which is partitioned into sub-vectors with a smaller
number of dimensions. During the updating process, the velocity
No. 3
which is advantageous for RFID applications since the tag-reader orientation is not strictly limited. The antenna gain at the simulated frequencies is 212.1, 21.7, and 5.2 dBi, respectively.
return loss,dB
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
3
4
frequency, GHz
E
0
30
4.00
30
6.00
120
120
120
150
150
0
30
30
32.00
120
120
150
30
60
90 90
90 90
90
14.00
2.00
18.00
34.00
60
60
36.00
46.00
150
30
30
8.00
22.00
60
60
6.00
120
120
150
150
180
f=0.92GHz
180
f=2.45GHz
90
120
120
150
150
Z. Ji: W. Yu, Y. Li and L. Jiang: Also with the Shenzhen Key Laboratory
of Embedded System Design, Shenzhen, China
References
180
f=5.8GHz
18.00
60
120
150
150
180
f=2.45GHz
0
4.00
90
120
150
150
180
f=0.92GHz
30
E-mail: jizhen@szu.edu.cn
90 90
90 90
120
60
26.00
36.00
90
16.00
30
2.00
12.00
60
60
22.00
46.00
30
30
8.00
60
60
0
30
18.00
32.00
60
simulation results show that the return loss within all the targeted frequency bands is better than 210 dB.
180
f=5.8GHz