Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:

Rosalie A. Doronila
Teacher 3
June 2015 to March 2016

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Mary Cris T. Casalan

Head Teacher III

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education, Division of Antique, Apgahan Elementary School

TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

Conducted/Participated in
seminars, workshops,
trainings within a year
(division, regional or
national)

TIMELIN
E
June 2015
to March
2016

Weigh
t per
KRA
35%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5
Conducted/Participated 5
seminars/workshops/ trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment
reports)
4
Conducted/Participated 4
seminars/workshops/ trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment
reports)
3

Conducted/Particpated 3
seminars/workshops/ trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

reports)
2
Conducted/Participated 2 seminars/
workshops/ trainings for teachers in
specific learning areas (supported
by evidence/assessment reports)

Received (division, regional

or national) awards
/recognitions within a year

1
Conducted/Participated 1 seminars/
workshops/ trainings for teachers in
specific learning areas (supported
by evidence/assessment reports)
5
4 awards /recognitions received

June 2015
to March
2016

4
3 awards /recognitions received
3
2 awards /recognitions received
2
1 awards /recognitions received
1
No awards /recognitions received
Instructional
Competence
(35%)

Handled teaching loads

every year

June 2015
to March
2016

35%

5
100% and above required teaching
load handled for year

4
84-99% required teaching load
handled for the year
3
68-83% required teaching load
handled for the year
2
51-67% required teaching load
handled for the year
1
50% and below of required teaching
loads handled for the year

Achieved at least 10%

increase of the pupils
performance at the end of
the school year

June 2015
to March
2016

Attained 100% of the

required learning
competencies for the
students in every quarter

June 2015
to March
2016

5
100% and above student
performance (in MPS or GSA)
4
84-99% student peformance (in
MPS or GSA)
3
68-83% student peformance (in
MPS or GSA)
2
51-67% student peformance (in
MPS or GSA)
1
50% and below student performance
(in MPS of GSA)
5
100% and above of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed

4
84-99% of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
3
68-83% of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
2
51-67% of the required
competencies in every quarter
competed
1
50% and below of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
5
10% increase

Increased NAT
performance by 10%

4
6% increase
3
5% increase
2
4% increase
1
3% and below increase
Instructional
Supervision
(30%)

Observed 2 teachers every

quarter

June 2015
to March
2016

30%

5
100% and above of teachers
observed with post conference with
teacher observation reports held in

every quarter
4
84-99% of teachers observed with
teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter
3
68-83% of teachers observed with
teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter

Conducted at least 3
mentoring/ coaching
activities with teachers
quarterly

June 2014
to March
2015

2
51-67% teachers observed with
teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter
1
50% and below of teachers
observed with teacher observation
and post conference reports, held
in every quarter
5
5 and above teacher mentoring
/coaching sessions were conducted
in every quarter ( with report)
4
4 teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
3
3 teacher mentoring /coaching

sessions conducted in every quarter

(with report)

Evaluated teachers
performance twice a year.

June 2014
to March
2015

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

2
1-2 teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
1
No teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
5
Evaluated 100% and above teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
4
Evaluated 84-99% teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
3
Evaluated 68-83% teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
2
Evaluated 51-67%of teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
1
Evaluated 50% and below of
teacher performance following
RPMS framework cycle
Overall Rating for
Accomplishment
s

AURELIO D. ODIONG
Rater

ELMER G. DORONILA, IV
Ratee