Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices
the environmental analysis process. Due
to the extensive scoping efforts already
conducted, no scoping meeting is
planned.
The scoping process will include
identification of potential issues, in
depth analysis of significant issues,
development of alternatives to the
proposed action, and determination of
potential environmental effects of the
proposal and alternatives. While public
participation in this analysis is welcome
at any time, comments received within
30 days of the publication of this notice
will be especially useful in the
preparation of the draft environmental
impact statement. The public is
encouraged to take part in the planning
process and to visit with Forest Service
officials at any time during the analysis
and prior to the decision.
Preliminary Issues
The following preliminary issues have
been identified for this proposal:
Construction of roads in the Underwood
Inventoried Roadless Area, impacts to
water quality from construction
activities associated with the project,
potential spreading of noxious weed
species known to occur in the area
because of the projects ground
disturbing activities, and use of
alternatives to ground based systems.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments submitted
during the November 2004 scoping
period will be used in the
environmental analysis process. Those
who submitted comments at that time
do not need to comment again, unless
they have new comments they would
like to provide. The public is
encouraged to take part in the process
and is encouraged to visit with Forest
Service officials at any time during the
analysis and prior to the decision. The
Forest Service will be seeking
information, comments, and assistance
from Federal, State, and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations
that may be interested in, or affected by,
the proposed vegetation management
activities.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be forty-five days
from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability in the Federal Register.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:14 Dec 02, 2005 Jkt 208001
72423
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the
forty-five day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the final environmental impact
statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: November 29, 2005.
Jeff Walter,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–23603 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Siskiyou County Resource Advisory
Committee
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Siskiyou County
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
in Yreka, California, December 19, 2005.
The meeting will include routine
business, a discussion of larger scale
projects, and the recommendation for
implementation of submitted project
proposals.
DATES: The meeting will be held
December 19, 2005, from 4 p.m. until 6
p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Yreka High School Library, Preece
Way, Yreka, California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
Talley, RAC Coordinator, Klamath
National Forest, (530) 841–4423 or
electronically at rtalley@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. Public
comment opportunity will be provided
and individuals will have the
opportunity to address the Committee at
that time.
Dated: November 29, 2005.
Margaret J. Boland,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05–23604 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
BROADCASTING BOARD OF
GOVERNORS
Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting
DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, November
30, 2005, 2 p.m.–3 p.m.
PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3360, 330
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20237.
Closed Meeting: The members of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG)
will meet in a special session to review
and discuss budgetary issues relating to
U.S. Government-funded non-military
international broadcasting. This meeting
is closed because if open it likely would
either disclose matters that would be
properly classified to be kept secret in
the interest of foreign policy under the
appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C.
552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose
information the premature disclosure of
which would be likely to significantly
frustrate implementation of a proposed
agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)).
In addition, part of the discussion will
05DEN1
 72424 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices
relate solely to the internal personnel
and organizational issues of the BBG or
the International Broadcasting Bureau.
(5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Persons interested in obtaining more
information should contact Carol
Booker at (202) 203–4545.
Dated: November 30, 2005.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–23685 Filed 12–1–05; 3:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–816]
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Korea: Extension of
Time Limits for the Final Results of
Antidumping Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria Cho at (202) 482–5075, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 22, 2004, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat
products from Korea, covering the
period August 1, 2003, to July 31, 2004,
(the ‘‘eleventh review’’) (69 FR 56745).
On April 7, 2005, the Department fully
extended the preliminary results of the
eleventh administrative review by 120
days (70 FR 17648). On September 7,
2005, the Department published the
preliminary results of the eleventh
administrative review (70 FR 53153).
The final results of this review are
currently due no later than January 5,
2006.
Extension of Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to issue (1) the
preliminary results of a review within
245 days after the last day of the month
in which occurs the anniversary of the
date of publication of an order or
finding for which a review is requested,
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:56 Dec 02, 2005 Jkt 208001
and (2) the final results within 120 days
after the date on which the preliminary
results are published. However, if it is
not practicable to complete the review
within that time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days and to extend the time limit
for the final result to a maximum of 180
days. See also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
We determine that it is not practicable
to complete the final results of this
review within the original time limit of
complex model-match issues that cuts
across all of the antidumping duty
orders on the subject merchandise.
Therefore, the Department is extending
the deadline for the final results of the
above referenced review by 32 days
until February 6, 2006.This extension is
in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–23625 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–847)
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
the Final Results of the Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Persulfates From the People’s
Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Riggle at (202) 482–0650 or
Frances Veith at (202) 482–4295, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 10, 2005, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on persulfates
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period July 1,
2003, through June 30, 2004. See
Persulfates from the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
Review, 70 FR 46476 (August 10, 2005).
The Department is extending the time
limit for the final results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on persulfates
from the PRC. The final results of this
review are currently due no later than
December 8, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Review
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
final results of an administrative review
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within this time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
time limit for the final results to 180
days (or 300 days if the Department
does not extend the time limit for the
preliminary results) from the date of
publication of the preliminary results.
Completion of the final results within
the 120-day period is not practicable
due to several complex issues regarding
the selection of the appropriate
surrogate financial statements to use in
the calculation of normal value for the
final results. The parties have submitted
extensive arguments regarding the use
of financial data from producers of
comparable products to derive surrogate
financial ratios.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for issuing
the final results of this review by 60
days until February 6, 2006.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: November 29, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–6844 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–878]
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Administrative
Review: Saccharin From the People’s
Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.
05DEN1