Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN AHP APPROACH
Muhamad Abduh
IIUM Institute of Islamic Banking and Finance, International Islamic University Malaysia
205A Jalan Damansara, Damansara Heights, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Email: abduh.iium@gmail.com
Abstract
The study of bank selection criteria has received attention from many bank marketing researchers. However, from its inception
in three decades ago, this kind of study is still scanty for Islamic banking industry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the
Islamic-bank selection criteria, particularly in Malaysia. To accomplish this purpose, information collected from 279 respondents within
the Klang-valley area was incorporated in the analysis. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used to rank the criteria based on the
respondents’ preferences. The result has shown that shariah-compliant attribute is the highest priority before an individual decides to
patronize an Islamic bank. The next priorities are given to profitability, bank’s reputation, bank’s status, facilities and services, and
friendly personnel respectively. Thus, one of the implications of this study is that Islamic banks cannot be too liberal by following all
the footprints of conventional bank without giving attention to shariah principles and objectives of shariah. Key words: AHP, Islamic
Banking, Selection Criteria.
Islamic banking is now a promising business in the with Islamic bank customers, particularly in Malaysia. This
study uses the analytic hierarchy process approach in order
growth just after three decades of its inception. There are to get an accurate picture on how people rank the criteria
before they have decided to patronize an Islamic bank.
across 75 countries. According to the Asian Banker
Research Group, The World’s 100 largest Islamic banks Review of Related Literature
have set an annual asset growth rate of 26.7% and the global
Islamic Finance industry is experiencing average growth of The study of bank selection criteria and bank patronize
15-20% annually (McKinsey, 2008). behavior has been done in a large number of studies.
However, similar to its conventional counterpart,
Islamic banks also depend on depositors’ money as a
major source of funds. In fact, since interest is forbidden main factor in determining customers’ decision in using
conventional banks’ services, while Owusu-Frimpong
(1999), Ta and Har (2000), Kaynak and Harcar (2005) and
reason, deposits are even more important in Islamic bank
compared to conventional bank. The more the number of quality, such as low service charges and high interest rates,
depositors the more money received to enhance the main are the major reasons why customers chose a particular
functions of the institutions. Thus, it is very important for bank.
people to patronize Islamic banks, in order to increase the affecting customers’ decision are convenience, competence,
number of their depositors, which in the end is to enhance recommendation by peers, and free banking charges
the performance of the bank. (Hinson et al., 2009; Blankson et al., 2007; Laroche et al.,
This study is aimed at analyzing bank selection criteria 1993; Ardic and Yuzereroglu, 2009; Yavas and Kaynak,
in the Islamic banking framework through direct interview 1993; Babakus et al., 2004). Saunders et al., (2007), for an
Muhamad A., Mohd A. O. - Islamic–Bank Selection Criteria in Malaysia: An AHP Approach.
272 Business Intelligence Journal July
opportunity to be chosen.
With respect to corporate customers’ selection criteria,
Afterwards, studies by Hegazy (1995) on Egypt, Naser et El-Bdour (1989), Erol et al (1990), Haron et al (1994) and
(2006) on Indonesia and Dusuki and Abdullah (2007) on although in a very low level compared to other factors
Malaysia are agree with the previous studies and infer that
religiosity is not the main reason for people to patronize patronize Islamic banks.
Islamic banks.
However, Metawa and Almossawi (1998) incorporate
the selection criteria variables such as rate of return,
convenience, services and others together with religiosity in
Bank’s
Profita-
Reputat
bility
i-on
Bank’s
Islamic status
Shariah bank (full
issues selection fledge /
criteria Window)
Staff
friend- Facilities
liness provided
while the present study will rank the level of importance comparison scale e.g. 1 for equally preferred until 9 for
of these factors according to the depositors’ perception extremely preferred (see Table 4). For example, respondent
on priority of each factors. This valuable information is
per se, and then he put 5 inside the cell in row 1 column
theoretical development of related studies as well as the
Islamic banking industry for their customers’ maintenance compliant, then he put 1/5 inside the corresponding cell.
program and liquidity stability.
Business Intelligence Journal - July, 2012 Vol.5 No.2
2012 Muhamad Abduh, Mohd Azmi Omar 275
Sampling technique in this study is started by cluster as the area from where the information will be collected.
sampling in order to choose which city or area enumerators Due to the limitation of not having the list of respondents,
will go to collect the data required. Klang Valley was chosen for the next step, convenience sampling will be applied to
get a number of 385 samples from Islamic bank depositors.
Sample size formula for large population used in this Thus, as many as 385 respondents are intended to
study is adapted from Israel (1992): be incorporated in this study. Unfortunately, due to
incomplete information given by some respondents, only
z 2 pq (1) 279 respondents (73 %) can be included in the analysis.
n0 However, one of the advantages of using AHP is that it
e2 does not require many respondents in the analysis; it can be
applied even to one respondent.
where:
n0 = Sample size Method of Analysis: Analytic Hierarchy Process
z= The AHP was selected for this study due to its suitability
p = Variability (variability used in this study is 0.5) in evaluating multiple-criteria decision-making problems
q=1-p (Udo, 2000; Yang and Lee, 2002). The aggregate individual
e = Level of precision or sampling error (sampling error priorities (AIP) framework of AHP is the most suitable
tolerated in this study is 5%) method to obtain the rank-of-priority of certain criteria
from many individuals when they are acting in their own
Therefore, sample size is equal to; rights and researchers are concern about each individual’s
resulting alternative priorities.
z 2 pq (1.96) 2 (0.5)(0.5) The AHP is a theory of measurement for dealing
n0 385
e2 (0.05) 2
Muhamad A., Mohd A. O. - Islamic–Bank Selection Criteria in Malaysia: An AHP Approach.
276 Business Intelligence Journal July
Consistency in step 6 above is the degree to which the Computing the Weights for Criteria
perceived relationship between elements in the pairwise
comparisons is maintained. It is important because
comparisons lacking consistency may indicate that the calculate the weights or the normalized scores for the
respondents did not understand the differences in the different criteria. The normalized scores will be computed
choices presented or were unable to assess accurately the using geometric means because the geometric mean
relative importance of the elements compared. On the for a series (e.g. 1, 2, …, N ) is less affected by extreme
other hand, a lack of information about the criteria being values than the arithmetic mean. Besides, it is useful as a
compared or a lack of concentration during the judgment measure of central tendency for some positively skewed
process can also cause inconsistency. distributions. For a series containing n elements, the
geometric mean is given by the n-th root of the product of criteria Cp, p = 1, 2,..., N, the geometric mean (GMCp) is
the scores and the normalized criterion weight is given by given by ( j 1rpj ) and the normalized score ( NSCp ) is
N 1/ N
the ratio of the geometric mean divided by the sum of the given N
geometric means of all the elements of the series. For the GM C p GM C p
p 1
GM C1
GM C1 1 r11 r12 ... r1N
1/ N
NS C1
GM C1 GM C2 ... GM C N
GM C2
GM C2 1 r21 r22 ... r2 N
1/ N
NS C2
GM C1 GM C2 ... GM C N
GM C N
NS C N
GM C N 1 rN 1 rN 2 ... rNN GM C1 GM C2 ... GM C N
1/ N
Table 6 illustrates the procedure for computing the is assumed, the harmony and homogeneity condition must
geometric mean and the normalized scores for the N criteria. exist and therefore only geometric mean is suitable as the
It shows as well the normalized score for the M objects with method to aggregate the individual’s priorities (Aczel and
respect to the N criteria. The calculation of geometric mean Saaty, 1983).
and the normalized score for the banks is done for each In the case of AIP, Ramanathan and Ganesh (1994)
criterion in an identical way as the computation of criterion suggest to use arithmetic mean instead of geometric mean as
weights. the method of aggregating individual’s priorities. However,
Forman and Peniwati (1998) suggest two possible ways Forman and Peniwati (1998) had proven mathematically
to aggregate information when more than one individual that even in the case of AIP, both geometric and arithmetic
participate in the decision process, which are: mean can be used (Forman and Peniwati, 1998. p.167). In
i. Aggregating individual judgments (AIJ) and, this study, AIP framework is used because group is not seen
ii. Aggregating individual priorities (AIP). as a new individual, but concerns on individual’s priorities
instead. The method to aggregate the individual’s priorities
Using AIJ or AIP framework depends upon the is geometric mean.
assumption given to the group being asked, whether
the group is assumed to be a synergistic unit or simply a Results and Discussion
collection of individuals. AIJ is applied when individuals
are willing to abandon their preferences and the organization Demography of Respondents
or the group is become a new ‘individual’ and behaves like
one. On the other hand, AIP is applied when individuals are From table 7, out of 279 respondents, 113 (40.5%) were
acting in their own rights and researchers are concern about male and 166 (59.5%) were female while none of them are
each individual’s resulting alternative priorities. non-Muslims. The marital status distributions were 135
Forman and Peniwati (1998) mention that treating the (48.4%) married and 144 (51.6%) were not married while
for level of education, 46 (16.5%) were diploma holder and
reciprocity condition for the judgments. However, when below, 63 (22.6%) were bachelor degree holder and 170
aggregating n individuals where the reciprocal situation (60.9%) were postgraduate degree holder.
Muhamad A., Mohd A. O. - Islamic–Bank Selection Criteria in Malaysia: An AHP Approach.
278 Business Intelligence Journal July
Geometric Mean
n = 113 observations
Based on the priority vector, the most important criteria customers about losing their money if their bank liquidated
affecting the choice of an Islamic bank is its compliancy or announced to be bankrupt. The rational action to mitigate
bank’s reputation, the bank’s status, facilities and services safer place, which are Islamic banks.
provided by the bank, and friendly personnel respectively. As a dual-banking system country, Malaysia adopts
Although the weights of priorities are different between conventional and Islamic banking system simultaneously.
groups, the ranks of priorities for each criterion are similar This will allow a conventional bank to open its Islamic
between groups. subsidiary which offers customers with Islamic banking
products while the parent bank is still a conventional bank.
This situation is somehow affecting customer’s decision
Hierarchy making process on which Islamic bank should be chosen.
Conclusion
Paper presented at the 7th International Conference Rohmah N (2006). Deposits determinants of Islamic
on Islamic Economics, 1-3 April 2008, King Abdul bank in Indonesia: An ARDL modeling approach.
Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Master Thesis, Kulliyah of Economics
Kaynak E, Harcar T (2005). American consumers’ and Management Sciences of IIUM.
attitudes towards commercial banks. Intl. J. of Rosenblatt J, Laroche M, Hochstein A, McTavish
Bank Marketing. 23(1): 73-89. R, Sheahan M (1988). Commercial banking in
Kennington C, Hill J, Rakowska A (1996). Consumer Canada: A study of the selection criteria and service
selection criteria for banks in Poland. Intl. J. of
Bank Marketing. 17(5): 12-21. Marketing. 6(4): 19-30.
Laroche M, Rosenblatt JA, Manning T (1993). Services Saaty TL, KearnsKP (1985). Analytic Planning: The
used and factors considered important in selecting a organization of systems. Pergamon, Oxford.
bank: An investigation across diverse demographic Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001). Models, Methods,
segments. Intl. J. of Bank Marketing. 4(1): 35-55. Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy
Mckinsey (2008). The World Islamic Banking Process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The
Competitiveness Report 2007-08, “Capturing Netherlands.
The Trillion Dollar Opportunity”. Mckinsey and
Company. factors in consumer bank selection: evidence from
Metawa SA, Almossawi M (1998). Banking behavior Northern Cyprus. Banks and Banks System. 2 (4):
of Islamic bank customers: perspectives and 93-100.
implications. Intl. J. of Bank Marketing. 16(7): Saunders SG, Bendixen M, Abratt R (2007). Banking
299-313. patronage motives of the urban informal poor. J. of
Mokhlis S (2009). Determinants of choice criteria in Serv. Marketing. 21(1): 52-63.
Malaysia’s Retail Banking: An analysis of gender- Ta HP, Har KY (2000). A study of bank selection
based choice decisions. Euro. J. of Econ., Fin. and decisions in Singapore using the analytical
Adm. Sciences. 16: 18-30. hierarchical process. Intl. J. of Bank Marketing.
Naser K, Jamal A, Al-Khatib K (1999). Islamic 18(4): 170-180.
banking: a study of customer satisfaction and Turnbull PW, GibbsMJ (1989). The selection of banks
preference in Jordan. Intl. J. of Bank Marketing. and banking services among corporate customers
17(3): 135-150. in South Africa. Intl. J. of Bank Marketing. 7(5):
36-39.
A study of customer satisfaction and bank selection Udo GG (2000). Using analytical hierarchy process
criteria. J. of Econ. Coop. 26(4): 51-86. to analyze the information technology outsourcing
Owusu-Frimpong N (1999). Patronage behavior decision. Indust. Mgt. and Data Syst. 100(9): 421-
of Ghanaian bank customers. Intl. J. of Bank 429.
Marketing. 17(7): 335-341. Yang J, Lee H (2002). Identifying key factors for
Ramanathan R, Ganesh LS (1994). Group preference successful joint venture in China. Indust. Mgt. and
aggregation methods employed in AHP: an Data Syst. 102(2): 98-109.
evaluation and intrinsic process for deriving Yavas U, Kaynak E (1993). Key dimensions of the
members’ weightages. Euro. J. of Operation. Res. bank patronage decision. Mgt. Res. News. 5(2):
79: 249-265. 22-24.