You are on page 1of 24

amgroup01@msn.

com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Blog: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
PETITIONER

:
:
:
:
:

v.

CASE NO. 14-2559

:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
RESPONDANT

:
:
:
:
NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Stanley J. Caterbone, MOVANT in the above captioned case,
hereby files an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from an ORDER
that failed to consider the INTERESTS AND FILINGS OF THE MOVANT, and DENIED Motion for
Summary Judgment in the above captioned case, entered in this case on the 14 th day of
September, 2015. The MOVANT requests an expedited resolution to this case considering it is
central to the HABEUS CORPUS of the PETITIONER, Lisa Michelle Lambert, filed in May of 2014.

Date: September 30, 2015

Stanley J. Caterbone, MOVANT


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
amgroup01@msn.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/

Page 1 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL


Clearly the Honorable Judge Paul S. Diamond had intentions other than that of fair and equitable jurist prudence regarding this case. The MOVANT, Stan J. Caterbone, has been fighting for
his reputation, his integrity, his intellectual property, his personal property, his basic human
rights, and most importantly his constitutional rights in this court for the past ten (10) years as
pro se. The MOVANT had made a bona fide attempt to provide as much factual background to
the Honorable Judge Diamond as humanly possible in as an efficient manner as possible so as not
to clutter the courts and the dockets. You must remember the MOVANT has the burden of articu lating to the COURTS a 30 plus year legal quagmire. See Case No. 07-4474 in the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals.

If you review the ORDER of September 14, 2015 in an objective manner you will see that
the Honorable Judge Paul S. Diamond went out of his way not to include any reference to the ac tual interest of the MOVANT in this case, but rather distracted the COURT with mentions of back ground information in a clear and convincing effort to libel and slander the MOVANT.

The last

sentence in the ORDER of September 14, 2015 reads He has nonetheless continued to submit fil ings that have nothing to do with this case. I beg to differ. In addition the MOVANT was granted
electronic filing priveledges by the Honorable Judge Joyner on September 2, 2015 in the
MOVANT'S Petition for Habeus corpus case no. 15-3984.

The following are items that are on the record in this case and should compel the said
Court to remand the Summary Judgment back to the lower court for further review, or grant the
MOVANT Summary Judgement and release Lisa Michelle Lambert from further custody.

Statement of Movant, June 20, 2015 clerks maliciously placed this statement as the
last few pages of the Movant's Amicus Filing of June 23, 2015.
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as a corroborating witness to the prosecutorial misconduct that was found in this court before the Honorable Stewart Dalzell in 1997. The Movant
has made several personal attempts to bring his evidence to the courts. In November of 1997
the Movant had solicited the counsel of Ms. Christina Rainville and her firm Schnader & Harrison

Page 2 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

of Philadelphia. The Movant had arranged and delivered a letter and evidence of his own prosecutorial misconduct by the Lancaster County District Attorney and local authorities at Ms. Rainvilles
request. Ms. Rainville then returned a letter to the Movant that explained that Schnader & Harri son had made the decision that she could no longer accept any additional clients from Lancaster
County. At that time Ms. Rainville was already involved the Darrell McCrakken case of Lancaster
County.
In December of 1997 the Movant hand delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of the Honorable Judge Stewart Dalzall that contained evidence of the same.
This amicus provides a voice for the movants as well as providing another perspective and
opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented
in this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the opinion and
ORDER of the Honorable Paul S. Diamond on May 22, 2014.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMNT filed on September 3, 2015
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMNT
Given the preponderance of evidence associated with the MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS, the courts must conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District
of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzalls findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa Lambert case
identifying acts of prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of the MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS, now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster.
Criminal law may determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible
criminal enterprise. The MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS is of material interest to the
Habeus Corpus filed by Lisa Michelle Lambert in May of 2014, for the very fact that this MOVANT'S
AMICUS and STATEMENTS compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the
scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights.
In the truthfulness of MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS, The Commonwealth must concede and immediately release Lisa Michelle Lambert from incarceration in order to balance the
scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. The Commonwealth must yield the criminal
culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts;
by its own admission of wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of its commitment to administer
equalities of justice, not inequalities of justice, balancing the scales of justice. Anything less,
would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitution of the United States.

Page 3 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

In addition the MOVANT must be restored to whole by administering SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS in cases 05-2288; 06-4650; and all other cases filed by the MOVANT in this court. SUM MARY JUDGEMENTS must also be administered in Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster Court of
Common Pleas, and other cases filed by the MOVANT in that said court.

AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL


I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit
concerning the years during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally abused, subjected
to a massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive fight for the
sovereignty of my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and right of due access
to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting the dire consequences
of this complaint. These allegations are substantiated through a preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over 10,000 documents, over 50 hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several digital mediums. A Findings of Facts is attached herewith pro viding merits and the facts pertaining to this affidavit. These issues and incidents identified herein
have attempted to conceal my disclosures of International Signal & Control, Plc. However, the
merits of the violations contained in this affidavit will be proven incidental to the existence of any
conspiracy.
The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law. Financial considerations would exceed $1 million. These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident
and business owner in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and have continued to the present. These
issues are a direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc., of County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state
statutes governing my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my interests in International Signal & Control., Plc.. I will also prove intentional undo influence against family and
friends towards compromising the credibility of myself, with malicious and self serving accusations
of insanity. I conclude that the courts must provide me with fair access to the law, and most
certainly, the process must void any technical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to
the conclusions. Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our
Constitution.
1. The activities contained herein may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the scope
of law pertaining to issues and activities compromising the National Security of the United States.
The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due to the criminal record of International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an end user Iraq, the laws of disclo sure must be forfeited by virtue that said activities posed a direct compromise to the National
Security of the United States.; the plaintiff will argue that his public allegations of misconduct
within the operations of International Signal & Control, Plc., as early as June of 1987 ;demon-

Page 4 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

strated actions were proven to protect the National Security of the United States.. The activities
of International Signal & Control, Pls., placed American troops in harms way. The plaintiffs actions
should have taken the American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the International Signal & Control, Plc., to cease and desist. All activities contained herein have greatly compromised the National Security of the United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiffs intent and motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plain tiff been protected under the law, and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United States
troops may have been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the operations of In ternational Signal & Control, Plc., in as early as 1987.

2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial miscon duct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff from continuing his public disclosures regarding illegal activities within International Signal & Control, Plc,. On June 23, 1998, International Signal
& Control, Plc was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger with Ferranti International, of England.
Such disclosures threatened the integrity of International Signal & Controls organization, and Mr.
James Guerin himself, consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if
such disclosures provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later be came the central criminal activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania.

3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse consequences
and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal holdings. The dire consequences
of the plaintiffs failed business dealings will demonstrate and substantiate financial incentive and
motive. Defendants responsible for administering undo influence and interference in the plaintiffs
business and commercial enterprises had financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as a taxing authority, Lancaster County had a great investment whos demise would facilitate
grave consequences to its economic development. . Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon) would
have less competition in the mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the
lender liability laws. The Steinman Enterprises, Inc., would loose a pioneer in the information
technologies industries, and would protect the public domain from truthful disclosure. The plaintiff
will also provide significant evidence of said perpetrators violating common laws governing intel lectual property rights.
4.

Given the plaintiffs continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in

June of 1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to the law with
the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal and state statutes. The
plaintiff will successfully argue his rights to the courts to rightfully claim civil actions with regards

Page 5 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

to the totality of these activities, so described in the following Findings of Facts, regardless of
any statute of limitations.

Given the plaintiffs genuine efforts for due process has been inherent-

ly and maliciously obstructed, the courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial
actions deserving to the plaintiff.
5. Under current laws, the plaintiffs intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of discrediting the plaintiffs disclosures and obstructing the plaintiffs right to due process of the law. The
plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws to enter into contract. The
logic and reason towards the plaintiffs activities and actions are a matter of record, demonstrated
in the Findings of Facts, contained herein.. The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that
the inherent emotional consequences to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post
Traumatic Stress Syndrome. The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be
the direct result of the activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any men tal deficiency the plaintiff may or may not have. The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all laws, irrespective of the plaintiffs alleged intellectual capacity. The plaintiff successfully argue that his mental capacity is of very little legal consequence, if any; other than in its
malicious representations used to diminish the credibility of the plaintiff.
6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff from further public disclosure into the activities of International Signal & Control, Plc., consequently obstructing the plaintiffs access to due process of
the law. Due to the fact that these activities to which the plaintiffs perpetrators were protecting
were illegal activities, the RICO statutes would apply. To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime with the exception of 2 speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial misconduct during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23,
1987 and continuing to today.
7.Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must conclude
that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge
Stuart Dalzalls findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa Lambert case identifying acts of prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit, now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of
prosecutorial misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster.
Criminal law must now determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible
criminal enterprise. This affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that
this affidavit compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales of jus tice even further from the peoples deserving rights.. In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The
Commonwealth must concede Lisa Michelle Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no
other act could accomplish. Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle
Lambert to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by its own admission of
wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of its commitment to administer equalities of justice, not in-

Page 6 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

equalities of justice. Balancing the scales of justice. Anything less, would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitu tion of the United States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole.

Page 7 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 15 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,
Petitioner,
v.
LYNN BISSONETTE, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Civ. No. 14-2559

ORDER
I previously dismissed Petitioners pro se motion for habeas relief so that she could file a
counseled motion.

(Doc. No. 3.)

She has not yet done so.

On June 23, 2015, Stanley

Caterbonewho has nothing to do with Petitioner, her motion, or this casefiled a pro se
amicus brief in support of the dismissed motion. (Doc. No. 4.) Caterbone neither sought leave
to file, nor indicated that he had received the Parties consent to file an amicus brief. Fed. R.
Civ. P. 29(a).
The amicus briefalthough providing some arguments in apparent support of the
dismissed motionessentially focuses on the damages Caterbone allegedly suffered from his
years of torture as a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control or as a victim of gang-stalking or
organized stalking by more than 100 people. (Doc. No. 4 at 7, 9). He also includes a lengthy
discussion of the perplexing question of Stan Caterbones intelligence, or lack thereof, and his
work on a digital movie that is directly responsible for the development of the internet.
(Id. at 16-26). In addition, he details thirty governmental attempts at mind control, including:
1) Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy; 2) Invading my
thoughts via remote sensing technologies; and 3) Making me mentally hear others voices

Page 8 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 15 Filed 09/14/15 Page 2 of 3

through the microwave hearing effect. (Id. at 27-30.)


Caterbones involvement in the matter did not end with his amicus brief. On July 6,
2015, he filed with this Court an email that he had sent to the Lancaster Police, asserting that he
has synthetic telepathy. (Doc. No. 5.) On September 2 and 3, 2015, Caterbone moved for
summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 8, 9.) On September 3, 2015, he moved to file a copy of his
motion for reconsideration of the denial of his petition to proceed in forma pauperis in
Pennsylvania state court, (which had been dismissed as frivolous). (Doc. No. 10.)

On

September 9, 2015, he also moved to file: 1) an email exchange with the subject Muslims Using
My Situation to Fight Against the USA; 2) a Wikipedia article on Entrapment; and 3) an
exhibit of billing statements of his estimated fees for his 2007 work on wholly unrelated federal
and state court cases. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12, 14.)

On September 9, 2015, Caterbone called my

Chambers, demanding to speak with me, and then abruptly hung up.
I have already denied Caterbones request to file documents electronically. (Doc. No. 9.)
He has nonetheless continued to submit filings that have nothing to do with this case.

Page 2 of 3
Page 9 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 15 Filed 09/14/15 Page 3 of 3

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that Mr.
Caterbones Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 8, 9) and Motions to File Exhibits or
Statements (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 12, 14) are DENIED as frivolous. It is FURTHER ORDERED
that Stanley J. Caterbone may no longer submit filingswhether electronic or in paper format
in the above-captioned case. The Clerk shall not docket any such filings without my approval.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Paul S. Diamond


_________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.

September 11, 2015

Page 3 of 3
Page 10 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 11 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 12 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 13 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 14 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 15 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 16 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 17 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 18 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 19 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 20 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 21 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 22 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 23 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Page 24 of 24

Wednesday, September 30, 2015