FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Federal RICO Violations & MA Legislation Concerns

Exposed in Federal Foreclosure Case
Boston, MA, September 29, 2015 Official complaints are now filed with the United States Inspector
General/DOJ, and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission, exposing details of evidenced
Collusion (alleged) associated with the Federal Foreclosure Case Harihar vs. US Bank, et al.,
Docket No: 15-cv-11880. Parties include the retained counsel (current & Prior) for Defendants Wells
Fargo & US Bank, the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Office, the US Attorneys Office, and the
Boston BAR Association:
1. The Plaintiffs discovery of evidenced improper relationships involving the Defendants
1
Counsel (current and prior) , the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Office, the US Attorneys
Office, and the Boston BAR Association.
2. The Plaintiff has clear reason to suspect, that these improper relationships show cause as to
why criminal complaints related to this civil action are being ignored by state and federal
prosecutors.
3. These allegations are believed to be part of a greater scheme, and are viewed as acts of
COLLUSION and Federal violations of the RICO ACT, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 2
RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS.
4. Per the direction of the Court, the plaintiff has now filed, On September, 24, 2015 two
complaints via the Executive Branch of Government, to address these very serious and
3
sensitive developments.
The second discovery of considerable concern involves a Massachusetts proposed Bill - S 1981,
CLEARING OF TITLE TO CERTAIN FORECLOSED PROPERTIES, On September 17, 2015, the
Massachusetts State Senate, in a vote of 31 7, passed a proposed bill that would restrict
homeowners to 3 years (down from 20 years) to sue the responsible lender in order to regain their
home after illegal foreclosure. This significant effort by Massachusetts State legislators to push
through this legislation raises a number of immediate concerns to this Plaintiff:
1. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has clearly acknowledged that an illegal foreclosure
and foreclosure sale has taken place involving the Plaintiffs home, located at 168 Parkview
avenue, Lowell, MA 01852. This has additionally been confirmed by both the Massachusetts
Attorney Generals Office, and Federal Bank Regulators.
2. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts acknowledges that CLEAR TITLE DOES NOT EXIST
with the Plaintiffs referenced foreclosure.
1

Current counsel (K&L Gates LLP, specifically Jeffrey S. Patterson, co-counsel to David E.
Fialkow); Prior counsel (Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP).
2
Scroll down to view the West LegalEd Center course entitled, After the Bubble Bursts
Mortgage and Foreclosure issues in Criminal and Civil Litigation.
3
Complaints are filed with the Office of the Inspector General - U.S. Department of Justice, and the
Massachusetts State Ethics Commission.

3. Despite over-communicating these supporting facts to Massachusetts State Courts for over
four (4) years, no corrective action has been taken, and no articulation of a decision has been
given, even when clarification has historically been requested.
4. There is an even greater concern now for ANY Massachusetts homeowner attempting
to bring suit against a lender for illegal foreclosure. This Plaintiff has provided
Massachusetts State Courts overwhelming supporting evidence for over four years, and NO
corrective action is being taken. It does not seem to matter if the statute of limitations is twenty
(20) years or one (1) year. It appears clear to this Plaintiff, that the Commonwealth has no
intention to correct the illegal conduct that has harmed so many.
a. With the Commonwealths effort to pass legislation to clear title, the Attorney General
has been using social media to communicate this effort, specifically via TWITTER. In
the same timeframe, for reasons unknown, Attorney General Maura Healey has
blocked this Plaintiff from viewing these efforts on the Mass.gov Attorney
4
General Twitter page.

As time goes on, the depth of misconduct continues to be revealed. Adding to the disappointment, are
state officials and legislators who have been regularly updated in this matter for over four (4) years,
and have remained completely silent, while attempting to boast of their accomplishments related to the
foreclosure crisis. Your silence and inaction here is considered shameful, and a disgrace to the Office
in which you serve. It will now be revealed in the Publics interest.
Scroll down to view Plaintiffs Motion in its entirety, filed with the US District Court on Friday,
th
September 25 , 2015.

For Further Media Information Contact: Mohan A. Harihar

Email: mh.foreclosure1@gmail.com
Phone: 617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Follow on Twitter:
Mohan Harihar@MH_Foreclosur1

Scroll down to view a photo of Plaintiffs cell phone, and failed attempts to access the Twitter page
of Attorney General Maura Healey.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

MOHAN A. HARIHAR
11880

CIVIL ACTION NO: 2015-cv-

Plaintiff
v.
US BANK NA, et al.
Defendants
PLAINTIFFS MOTION REQUESTING SECOND TIMELINE EXTENSION TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; PROPOSED BILL, S 1981
The Plaintiff, Mohan A. Harihar, respectfully files with the
Court, this request for a second timeline extension to file a
second amended complaint, taking into consideration the
following factors:
2. The Plaintiffs discovery of evidenced improper
relationships involving the Defendants Counsel (current
and prior)5, the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Office,
the US Attorneys Office, and the Boston BAR Association.
3. The Plaintiff has clear reason to suspect, that these
improper relationships show cause as to why criminal

Current counsel (K&L Gates LLP, specifically Jeffrey S.

Patterson, co-counsel to David E. Fialkow); Prior counsel
(Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP).
5

complaints related to this civil action are being ignored

by state and federal prosecutors.
4. These allegations are believed to be part of a greater
scheme, and are viewed as acts of COLLUSION and Federal
violations of the RICO ACT, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS.
5. Per the direction of the Court, the plaintiff has now
filed, On September, 24, 2015 two complaints via the
Executive Branch of Government, to address these very
serious and sensitive developments.6 Copies of the
submissions are attached for reference.7
6. With the allegations surrounding the Plaintiffs
Intellectual Property, and the threat to trillions of
dollars in US economic growth, a request for Whistleblower
Protection has been requested through the Department of
Justice.
7. Proposed Bill S 1981, CLEARING OF TITLE TO CERTAIN
FORECLOSED PROPERTIES On September 17, 2015, the
Massachusetts State Senate, in a vote of 31 7, passed a
proposed bill that would restrict homeowners to 3 years
(down from 20 years) to sue the responsible lender in

Complaints are filed with the Office of the Inspector General

- U.S. Department of Justice, and the Deputy Chief of
Investigations within the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission
7
See Attachment A
6

order to regain their home after illegal foreclosure. This

significant effort by Massachusetts State legislators to
push through this legislation raises a number of immediate
concerns to this Plaintiff:
a. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has clearly
acknowledged that an illegal foreclosure and
foreclosure sale has taken place involving the
Plaintiffs home, located at 168 Parkview avenue,
Lowell, MA 01852. This has additionally been
confirmed by both the Massachusetts Attorney
Generals Office, and Federal Bank Regulators.
b. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts acknowledges that
CLEAR TITLE DOES NOT EXIST with the Plaintiffs
referenced foreclosure.
c. Despite over-communicating these supporting facts to
Massachusetts State Courts for over four (4) years,
no corrective action has been taken, and no
articulation of a decision has been given, even when
clarification has historically been requested.
d. There is an even greater concern now for ANY
Massachusetts homeowner attempting to bring suit
against a lender for illegal foreclosure. This
Plaintiff has provided Massachusetts State Courts
overwhelming supporting evidence for over four years,

and NO corrective action is being taken. It does not

seem to matter if the statute of limitations is
twenty (20) years or one (1) year. It appears clear
to this Plaintiff, that the Commonwealth has no
intention to correct the illegal conduct that has
harmed so many.
e. With the Commonwealths effort to pass legislation to
clear title, the Attorney General has been using
social media to communicate this effort, specifically
via TWITTER. In the same timeframe, for reasons
unknown, Attorney General Maura Healey has blocked
this Plaintiff from viewing these efforts on the
Mass.gov Attorney General Twitter page.8
f. The Plaintiff respectfully brings a direct question
before this Court Why am I not able to live in my
home right now? The Plaintiff is still homeless, and
clearly should not be. Right now, the Plaintiff is
desperately trying to secure housing, and is close to
signing a lease on an apartment. The Plaintiff would
much rather be rightfully back in his own home. The
Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court re-

See Attachment B photo of Plaintiffs cell phone, and

failed attempts to access the Twitter page of Attorney General
Maura Healey.
8

consider the request for injunctive relief as these

facts are brought to the Courts attention.
8. The decision to come forward and expose the referenced
misconduct brings considerable concern for the Plaintiffs
safety and well-being for both the short, as well as the
long-term. It is however necessary to bring ALL facts
related to this matter to the Courts attention, if a fair
and just resolution is to ultimately be made here, and in
the Public interest.
9. A request for the appointment of a special prosecutor has
been respectfully made through the Office of the Inspector
General and the Department of Justice.
10.

Without the assistance of experienced legal counsel,

The collective (and still growing) allegations which

include Federal Violations of RICO, FALSE CLAIMS,
WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION, etc, involve areas far beyond
this Plaintiffs capability to accurately and timely
articulate and file this Federal complaint.
11.

A considerable timeline extension is necessary to

allow the referenced complaints filed with the Inspector

General and the Massachusetts State Ethics Commission to
be addressed, investigated, and whether any further
action/assistance comes from either Office.

The Plaintiff therefore respectfully requests from the Court

the following:
1. Grant the Plaintiff a ninety-day extension to allow
Federal and State authorities the proper time for
investigation, and to render its conclusions, prior to
proceeding with this Civil complaint. The Plaintiff will
plan to update the Court on or before the timeline
expiration, as updates are received.
2. With the acknowledgments from the Commonwealth confirming
the Plaintiffs illegal foreclosure and clouded title,
the Plaintiff respectfully pleads for the Court to reconsider injunctive relief, and to (at minimum) allow for
the Plaintiff to return to his home while these legal
matters proceed, and before the Plaintiff necessitates
making a twelve-month financial commitment on an
apartment lease.

The Plaintiff is grateful for the Courts consideration of this

request.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff

10

Attachment A

11

Dear MA State Ethics Commission,

Thank you for your email. Per our conversation, this email communication is sent to your attention
with the specific purpose of initiating a complaint against parties, whose actions (alleged) are
associated with identified misconduct of the US Foreclosure/Financial Crisis.
For the record, my name is Mohan A. Harihar - I have been a pro se litigant in MA State Courts for
over four (4) years (out of financial necessity), in effort to recoup accruing damages resulting from
an illegal foreclosure and displacement identified with the US Foreclosure Crisis. There is now a
new civil complaint which has been recently filed in the US District Court (Boston, MA, Docket
No:15-cv-11880, Harihar vs. US Bank, et al), as a greater scope of misconduct (alleged) is being
revealed. A sincere effort is additionally being made to align the referenced civil complaint with
related criminal complaints filed with the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, the
Massachusetts Inspector General's Office, the US Attorney's Office, and the Fraud Investigations
Unit of the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). These efforts to align referenced complaints are
seemingly being ignored by state and federal prosecutors. The US District Court has indicated that
they do not have the authority to align civil and criminal complaints, and that any concerns must
be addressed through the Executive Branch of Government.
There is clearly evidenced reason to suspect, that improper relationships including evidenced
Collusion, involves: the MA Attorney General's Office, the US Attorney's Office, the Boston BAR
Association, and the retained counsel for Defendants in the referenced civil litigation (Nelson
Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, and K&L Gates LLP). Attached for reference, is a copy of the
September 2015 Media Alert which includes the evidenced improper relationships including
COLLUSION, found in an advertisement for the West LegalEdcenter course entitled, After the
Bubble Bursts. Also included are email communications sent directly to the attention of Assistant
Director Andrew McCabe (FBI Washington, DC), US Attorney Carmen Ortiz, and Attorney General
Maura Healey.

12

These clearly evidenced allegations are believed to be part of a greater scheme and include (at
minimum) Federal RICO and FALSE CLAIMS violations. There is reason to suspect that an alleged
scheme may also be tied to infringement of intellectual property belonging to Mohan A. Harihar,
entitled the "FCS Model" (See attached PowerPoint Presentation). The FCS Model is an economic
framework designed to address multiple variables of the US Foreclosure/Financial Crisis. Properly
implemented, this framework is expected to deliver positive economic growth estimated in the
trillions of dollars. I have personally presented this framework to multiple parties including:

1.
2.

3.
4.
5.
6.

The Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General - Senior Policy Advisors Britte
McBride and Jennifer Stark.
The New Hampshire Attorney General (former) Michael Delaney - also included in this
meeting was the Governor's Chief of Staff, NH Secretary of State, and members of the
Governor's Council.
State Senator Eileen Donoghue (MA)
Congresswoman Nikki Tsongas (MA) - Presented to Director (former) Brian Martin.
Deputy Chief Counsel (Former) of the House Financial Services Committee - Gail Laster.
The Chairman of a Nationally ranked Strategic Communications firm.

This framework has since been reviewed by US Senator Warren's Senior Economic Advisor Bruno Freitas, and has also been sent to the Executive Offices of the President (EOP) at the
specific request of Vice President Joe Biden. NO ONE HAS FOUND FLAW WITH THIS
FRAMEWORK.
It is suspected, that along with the allegations of improper relationships, there has been
infringement of the referenced intellectual property (since presentation) to create related programs
and to influence and/or create legislation within the Commonwealth. This results in personal gain
to those responsible, if not directly in a financial capacity, then in recognition for achievement in
their professional role.
Therefore, for their respective roles as the person in charge of the Office of the Massachusetts
Attorney General, this initial complaint is filed against two (2) individuals, for their actions in this
matter, and their failure/refusal to bring criminal charges against responsible parties.:

1.
2.

Attorney General Maura Healey

Former Attorney General Martha Coakley

This is merely a fraction of the supporting evidence and information on file. A complete review of
the historical record will be necessary to reveal all supporting components as this process moves
forward.
Please note, there is now considerable concern involving the Commonwealth's effort to pass
legislation to CLEAR TITLE TO PROPERTY (S 1981), which has just passed in the Senate. For
reasons unknown, the MA Attorney General's Office has recently blocked the Twitter account
belonging to Mohan A. Harihar, prohibiting the ability to view these proposed efforts to CLEAR
TITLE.This matter is believed to be related to the referenced scheme previously mentioned.
A similar complaint is being filed on a federal level. If you have any questions, please call me direct
@ 617.921.2526 (mobile).

Thank you for your attention to this very serious and sensitive matter.

Sincerely,

13

Mohan A. Harihar
4 Attachments

Preview attachment MA-AGO Blocked.JPG

MA-AGO Blocked.JPG

Preview attachment Media Alert - September 2015.pdf

Media Alert - September 2015.pdf

Preview attachment HomeCorpsPPforCHAPA2-7-13-v2.pdf

HomeCorpsPPforCHAPA2-7-13-v2.pdf

Preview attachment VP Biden FCS - part 1 overview.ppt

VP Biden FCS - part 1 overview.ppt

14

Sep 21 (3 days ago)

Mr. Harihar:
This will confirm our conversation of this afternoon. You may respond to this email
with the particulars of your complaint, or you may mail it to me at the address below.

MA State Ethics Commission

One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108

The information contained in this communication, including any attachments, is

confidential, is intended for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be
exempt from public disclosure or subject to the attorney/client or work product
privileges. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please delete it and destroy all
copies.

15

Attachment B

16

17