Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
undeveloped buffer area. The Campo
Indian Reservation, which consists of
15,580 acres in southeastern San Diego
County, lies just north of the United
States/Mexico border and
approximately 45 miles inland from the
Pacific Ocean.
The Campo Band previously entered
into a lease agreement with Muht-Hei,
Inc. (MHI), pursuant to which MHI
would lease a portion of the Campo
Indian Reservation for the purpose of
constructing and operating a solid waste
landfill, recycling facility, and
composting facility. The Campo Band
originally authorized MHI in 1989 to
enter into a sublease with Mid-
American Waste Systems, Inc. (MAWS)
for the development of the solid waste
landfill facility. The Campo Band
requested the BIA approve the lease and
sublease for the proposed project. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
was prepared by BIA, in accordance
with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act, to evaluate
the environmental impacts of the
proposed project prior to determining
whether the proposed lease related to
the project should be approved. A Final
EIS (FEIS) was released on November
24, 1992. The BIA issued a Record of
Decision (ROD) with conditions on
April 27, 1993, and approved the lease
between the Campo Band and MHI and
sublease between MHI and MAWS for
the proposed solid waste landfill. The
Campo Environmental Protection
Agency (CEPA) issued a final Authority
to Construct Permit (ATC) to MHI and
MAWS on April 5, 1994, to construct
the proposed solid waste landfill,
subject to the conditions of the ROD and
ATC.
Subsequently, MAWS failed to
proceed with construction of the project
and MHI was found in default of the
sublease terms. Since that time, MHI has
solicited interest from other solid waste
landfill developers. In early 2003, MHI
began negotiations with BLT
Enterprises, Inc. (BLT), Oxnard,
California, on the terms of a sublease to
develop the solid waste landfill
described in the FEIS. Those
negotiations were successfully
concluded and on December 12, 2004,
the Campo Band authorized MHI to
enter into a sublease with BLT.
The BIA has decided to prepare a
SEIS to address changes in the proposed
action, relevant information that has
become available, or circumstances that
have changed over the years since the
FEIS was issued. Areas of concern
addressed in the FEIS included land
resources, water resources, air quality,
living resources, cultural resources,
socio-economics, transportation, land
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:11 Nov 07, 2005 Jkt 208001
67739
use, resource use patterns, noise and
other values. The FEIS included five
alternatives to the proposed action, as
follows: (1) Alternative Site One, (2)
Alternative Site Two, (3) Reduced Waste
Stream at the Proposed Site, (4)
Reduced Area of Disturbance at the
Proposed Site, and (5) No Action. The
SEIS will incorporate the proposed
project description from the FEIS by
reference, and will discuss aspects of
the project that have changed since the
FEIS was released in 1992, any changes
in environmental impacts associated
with those changes, and changes to
alternatives.
Public Comment Availability
Comments, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the BIA
address shown in the ADDRESSES
section, during business hours, 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays. Individual respondents
may request confidentiality. If you wish
us to withhold your name and/or
address from public review or from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
written comment. Such requests will be
honored to the extent allowed by the
law. We will not, however, consider
anonymous comments. All submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
Authority
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 1503.1, 1506.6
and 1508.22 of the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR Parts 1500 through 1508)
implementing the procedural
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 1–6), and is in the exercise of
authority delegated to the Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs by 209 DM 8.l.
Dated: October 24, 2005.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05–22173 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ID–300–1020–PH]
Notice of Public Meeting, Idaho Falls
District Resource Advisory Council
Meeting
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Idaho Falls
District Resource Advisory Council
(RAC), will meet as indicated below.
DATES: The meeting will be held
November 29–30, 2005 at the Hampton
Inn, 2500 Channing Way, Idaho Falls,
Idaho 83404. The meeting will start at
1 p.m. November 29, with an orientation
session for new members. This first day
will be information only, and no
decisions will be made. The second day,
November 30, will be for the full
Advisory Council, and the public
comment period as the first agenda
item, starting at 8 a.m. The meeting will
adjourn at or before 3 p.m. At this
meeting, the Advisory Council will set
its agenda for the coming year, schedule
meetings, and discuss current issues
before the BLM Idaho Falls District.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-
member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior, through the Bureau of
Land Management, on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in the BLM Idaho Falls
District (IFD), which covers eastern
Idaho. At this meeting, topics we plan
to discuss include:
• Orientation for new members.
• A discussion of recreational
upgrades to the Blackfoot Reservoir
campground and the need to set fees.
RAC members will be asked for their
input as to an appropriate range of fees
for the site, in preparation for a broader
public outreach campaign in December
and January.
• Updates on Idaho’s Sage Grouse
Conservation strategy, if completed and
released for public review.
• A field trip to the Cress Creek Trail,
weather permitting. If remaining
indoors, the discussion will also include
a brief update on the Upper Snake Field
Office South Fork Activity Plan
revision.
• Updates on the latest litigation for
BLM, and other current issues as
appropriate.
08NON1
 67740 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices
• The RAC will set an annual agenda.
• Other items of interest raised by the
Council.
Transportation for the field trip will
be provided for RAC members. Members
of the public wishing to accompany the
RAC on the field trip must furnish their
own transportation.
All meetings are open to the public.
The public may present written
comments to the Council. Each formal
Council meeting will also have time
allocated for hearing public comments.
Depending on the number of persons
wishing to comment and time available,
the time for individual oral comments
may be limited. Individuals who plan to
attend and need special assistance, such
as sign language interpretation, tour
transportation or other reasonable
accommodations, should contact the
BLM as provided below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Howell, RAC Coordinator, Idaho
Falls District, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho
Falls, ID 83401. Telephone (208) 524–
7559. E-mail: David_Howell@blm.gov.
Dated: November 2, 2005.
David Howell,
RAC Coordinator, Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. 05–22206 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–298 and 299
(Second Review); Investigations Nos. 701–
TA–267 and 268 and 731–TA–304 and 305
(Second Review)]
Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From
China and Taiwan; Top-of-the-Stove
Stainless Steel Cooking Ware From
Korea and Taiwan
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on porcelain-on-steel
cooking ware from China and Taiwan
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time. The
Commission also determines that
revocation of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on top-of-
the-stove stainless steel cooking ware
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:11 Nov 07, 2005 Jkt 208001
from Korea would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time,2 and that revocation of the
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on top-of-the-stove stainless steel
cooking ware from Taiwan would not be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on March 1, 2005 (70 FR 9974)
and determined on June 6, 2005 that it
would conduct expedited reviews (70
FR 35708, June 21, 2005).
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on October 27,
2005. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3808
(October 2005), entitled Porcelain-on-
Steel Cooking Ware From China and
Taiwan, and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless
Steel Cooking Ware From Korea and
Taiwan (Investigation Nos. 731–TA–298
and 299 (Second Review) and
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–267 and 268
and 731–TA–304 and 305 (Second
Review)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 1, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–22158 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
Editorial Note: This document was
inadvertently omitted from the issue of
Thursday, November 3, 2005.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Application
for Registration (DEA Form 225);
Application for Registration Renewal
(DEA Form 225a); Affidavit for Chain
Renewal (DEA Form 225b).
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) has
submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun,
Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane, and Commissioner
Daniel R. Pearson dissenting.
PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register, Volume 70, Number 154, page
46887 on August 11, 2005, allowing for
a 60 day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until December 8, 2005. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–5806. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Application for registration (DEA Form
225); Application for registration
renewal (DEA Form 225a); Affidavit for
chain renewal (DEA Form 225B).
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
08NON1