You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Proposed Rules 61239

including whether other factors limited A 60-day comment period is provided 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
the number of nominees in the earlier to allow interested persons the DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
selection process rather than the opportunity to respond to this request through Friday, except Federal holidays.
definition of substantial activity. The for information and comments. All For service information identified in
commenters stated that the size and written comments timely received will this proposed AD, contact Fokker
pool of the eligible importers (200) was be considered before any subsequent Services B.V., P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE
more than adequate to fill the vacancies rulemaking action is undertaken. Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands.
on the Board. Concern was expressed as Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7801–7813.
to the relationship of producers and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Dated: October 18, 2005. Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
importers on the Board.
The supporting commentors were of Lloyd C. Day, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
the view that the substantial activity Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
requirement unnecessarily limited the Service. Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
potential pool of nominees for service [FR Doc. 05–21081 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am] 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1137;
on the Board and denied some of the BILLING CODE 3410–02–P fax (425) 227–1149.
most significant and most qualified SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
individuals in the avocado industry to
serve on the Board DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Comments Invited
In a separate publication in the
Federal Register, the proposed rule was Federal Aviation Administration We invite you to submit any relevant
withdrawn without being finalized after written data, views, or arguments
taking into account the above. 14 CFR Part 39 regarding this proposed AD. Send your
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22748; Directorate comments to an address listed in the
Comments and Information Requested ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
Identifier 2005–NM–127–AD]
Information, suggestions, and number ‘‘FAA–2005–22748; Directorate
comments pertaining to the proposal are RIN 2120–AA64 Identifier 2005–NM–127–AD’’ at the
sought. Examples of specific beginning of your comments. We
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
information that would assist AMS in specifically invite comments on the
Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100
determining if this recommendation overall regulatory, economic,
Airplanes
should be proposed are: environmental, and energy aspects of
1. Specific recommendations for the AGENCY: Federal Aviation the proposed AD. We will consider all
definition—including volume of Administration (FAA), Department of comments received by the closing date
imports relative to the volume of Transportation (DOT). and may amend the proposed AD in
domestic production—that would allow ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking light of those comments.
the Department to measure substantial (NPRM). We will post all comments we
activity as is required by the Act. receive, without change, to http://
2. Data relative to the number of SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for dms.dot.gov, including any personal
importers that would become eligible to information you provide. We will also
serve on the Hass Avocado Board if the certain Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070
and 0100 airplanes. This proposed AD post a report summarizing each
definition changed. substantive verbal contact with FAA
3. Data relative to the number of would require modifying the passenger
door and installing new placards. This personnel concerning this proposed AD.
importers that would become eligible to
proposed AD results from reports of the Using the search function of that Web
serve on the Hass Avocado Board if the
airstairs-type passenger door opening site, anyone can find and read the
definition was not changed.
during flight. We are proposing this AD comments in any of our dockets,
Summary to prevent rapid decompression of the including the name of the individual
In conclusion, the AMS is soliciting airplane, or ejection of a passenger or who sent the comment (or signed the
the views of interested persons as to crew member out the door during flight. comment on behalf of an association,
amending the definition of substantial DATES: We must receive comments on
business, labor union, etc.). You may
activity to enable the Department to this proposed AD by November 21, review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
better measure substantial activity as is 2005. Statement in the Federal Register
required by the Act. Specifically, the published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following 19477–78), or you may visit http://
AMS is interested in the points addresses to submit comments on this
mentioned previously in this advance dms.dot.gov.
proposed AD.
notice as well as statistical information, • DOT Docket Web site: Go to Examining the Docket
suggestions, and comments pertaining http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
to the definition of substantial activity instructions for sending your comments You may examine the AD docket on
and the impact on the number of electronically. the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
eligible importers to serve on the Board. • Government-wide rulemaking Web person at the Docket Management
All views are solicited, however, so that site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
every aspect of this potential and follow the instructions for sending p.m., Monday through Friday, except
amendment may be studied prior to your comments electronically. Federal holidays. The Docket
formulating a proposed rule, if such is • Mail: Docket Management Facility, Management Facility office (telephone
deemed warranted by the AMS. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
This request for public comments Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
does not constitute notification that the room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. street address stated in the ADDRESSES
recommendation to change the • Fax: (202) 493–2251. section. Comments will be available in
regulations described in this document • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the AD docket shortly after the Docket
is or will be proposed or adopted. the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Management System receives them.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:35 Oct 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM 21OCP1
61240 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Proposed Rules

Discussion probably resulted from incorrect use of Revision 3, dated December 18, 2002;
the locking handle. Opening of the including Manual Change Notification—
The Civil Aviation Authority—The passenger door during flight could Operational Documentation MCNO–
Netherlands (CAA–NL), which is the result in rapid decompression of the F100–031, dated December 3, 2001, and
airworthiness authority for the airplane, or a passenger or crew member Manual Change Notification—
Netherlands, notified us that an unsafe being ejected out the door during flight. Maintenance Documentation MCNM–
condition may exist on certain Fokker The passenger door operating
Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 F100–064, Revision 2, dated December
mechanism and warning system is the 18, 2002; and including the drawings
airplanes. The CAA–NL advises of same on both Model F.28 Mark 0100
several cases of the airstairs-type listed in the following table. (To
and 0700 airplanes. Therefore, both of
passenger door opening during flight on conform to certain Office of the Federal
these airplane models are subject to the
a Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplane. Register requirements for incorporating
identified unsafe condition.
Investigators in all cases concluded that these materials by reference, the table
the incidents were not caused by defects Relevant Service Information identifies the date of the service bulletin
in the design of the operating Fokker Services B.V. has issued for undated drawings.)
mechanism or the warning system, but Service Bulletin SBF100–52–069,

DRAWINGS INCLUDED IN SERVICE BULLETIN SBF100–52–069


Fokker drawing Sheet Issue Date

W41074 .............................................................................................................................. 065 DB ............... December 18, 2002.


W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 003 L .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 005 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 006 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 007 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 008 M ................. December 18, 2002.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 001 D ................. August 14, 2000.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 002 B .................. August 14, 2000.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 003 F .................. June 11, 2001.
W59243 .............................................................................................................................. 024 AU ............... June 12, 2001.
W59261 .............................................................................................................................. 017 W ................. August 9, 2002.
W59261 .............................................................................................................................. 025 S .................. July 3, 2001.

The service bulletin describes airworthiness directive 2002–057, dated situation described above. We have
procedures for modifying the passenger April 29, 2002, to ensure the continued examined the CAA–NL’s findings,
door. The modification involves airworthiness of these airplanes in the evaluated all pertinent information, and
installing additional door status Netherlands. determined that we need to issue an AD
indicators above the door, including for airplanes of this type design that are
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
relays and a flasher, a door status LED certificated for operation in the United
indicator, a circuit breaker, and of the Proposed AD
States.
electrical wiring; and making a cut-out These airplane models are
in the cover above the passenger door. manufactured in the Netherlands and Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
The service bulletin also describes are type certificated for operation in the which would require accomplishing the
procedures for installing improved United States under the provisions of actions specified in the service
placards at the handle and on the door. section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation information described previously.
Accomplishing the actions specified in Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the Costs of Compliance
the service information is intended to applicable bilateral airworthiness
adequately address the unsafe agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral The following table provides the
condition. The CAA–NL mandated the airworthiness agreement, the CAA–NL estimated costs for U.S. operators to
service information and issued Dutch has kept the FAA informed of the comply with this proposed AD.

ESTIMATED COSTS
Number of
Average labor Cost per
Action Work hours Parts U.S.-registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplane airplanes

Modify door and install placards .......... 17–18 $65 $2,645 $3,750–3,815 2 $7,500–7,630

Authority for This Rulemaking detail the scope of the Agency’s air commerce by prescribing regulations
authority. for practices, methods, and procedures
Title 49 of the United States Code the Administrator finds necessary for
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII, safety in air commerce. This regulation
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, is within the scope of that authority
section 106, describes the authority of part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that because it addresses an unsafe condition
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, that is likely to exist or develop on
Aviation Programs, describes in more section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:35 Oct 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM 21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2005 / Proposed Rules 61241

products identified in this rulemaking List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 any category, as identified in Fokker Service
action. Bulletin SBF100–52–069, Revision 3, dated
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation December 18, 2002.
Regulatory Findings safety, Safety.
Unsafe Condition
The Proposed Amendment
We have determined that this (d) This AD results from reports of the
proposed AD would not have federalism Accordingly, under the authority airstairs-type passenger door opening during
implications under Executive Order delegated to me by the Administrator, flight. We are issuing this AD to prevent
13132. This proposed AD would not the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part rapid decompression of the airplane, or
have a substantial direct effect on the 39 as follows: ejection of a passenger or crew member out
States, on the relationship between the the door during flight.
national Government and the States, or PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES Compliance
on the distribution of power and
(e) You are responsible for having the
responsibilities among the various 1. The authority citation for part 39 actions required by this AD performed within
levels of government. continues to read as follows: the compliance times specified, unless the
For the reasons discussed above, I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. actions have already been done.
certify that the proposed regulation: Installation
§ 39.13 [Amended]
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (f) Within 30 months after the effective
2. The Federal Aviation
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; date of this AD, modify the passenger door
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the by adding the following new and install new placards, in accordance with
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker
airworthiness directive (AD):
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Service Bulletin SBF100–52–069, Revision 3,
Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA– dated December 18, 2002; including Manual
3. Will not have a significant 2005–22748; Directorate Identifier 2005– Change Notification—Operational
economic impact, positive or negative, NM–127–AD. Documentation MCNO–F100–031, dated
on a substantial number of small entities Comments Due Date December 3, 2001, and Manual Change
under the criteria of the Regulatory (a) The FAA must receive comments on
Notification—Maintenance Documentation
Flexibility Act. MCNO–F100–064, Revision 2, dated
this AD action by November 21, 2005.
December 18, 2002; and including the
We prepared a regulatory evaluation Affected ADs drawings listed in Table 1 of this AD. To
of the estimated costs to comply with conform to certain Office of the Federal
(b) None.
this proposed AD and placed it in the Register requirements for incorporating these
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section Applicability materials by reference, the table identifies the
for a location to examine the regulatory (c) This AD applies to Fokker Model F.28 date of the service bulletin for undated
evaluation. Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes, certificated in drawings.

TABLE 1.—DRAWINGS INCLUDED IN SERVICE BULLETIN SBF100–52–069


Fokker drawing Sheet Issue Date

W41074 .............................................................................................................................. 065 DB ............... December 18, 2002.


W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 003 L .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 005 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 006 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 007 E .................. December 18, 2002.
W41418 .............................................................................................................................. 008 M ................. December 18, 2002.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 001 D ................. August 14, 2000.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 002 B .................. August 14, 2000.
W42310 .............................................................................................................................. 003 F .................. June 11, 2001.
W59243 .............................................................................................................................. 024 AU ............... June 12, 2001.
W59261 .............................................................................................................................. 017 W ................. August 9, 2002.
W59261 .............................................................................................................................. 025 S .................. July 3, 2001.

Alternative Methods of Compliance Issued in Renton, Washington, on October DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


(AMOCs) 14, 2005.
(g)(1) The Manager, International Branch, Kalene C. Yanamura, Office of the Secretary
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 14 CFR Part 382
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
[FR Doc. 05–21054 Filed 10–20–05; 8:45 am]
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. [Docket No. OST–2005–22298]
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any RIN 2105–AC29
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding Disability in Air Travel—Medical
District Office. Oxygen and Portable Respiration
Assistive Devices
Related Information
(h) Dutch airworthiness directive 2002– AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST),
057, dated April 29, 2002, also addresses the U.S. Department of Transportation
subject of this AD. (DOT).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:35 Oct 20, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM 21OCP1

You might also like