Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by Jireh J. Yue
Introduction
In selecting materials for a given application one must have an idea of the final geometry and the dimension of the part. Under certain environmental conditions
and given loadings the part must be able to function properly. One way to make this decision is by comparing the failure criterion to a critical load factor.
Fracture is a very complex process that involves the nucleation and growth of micro and macro voids or cracks, mechanisms of dislocations, flip bands, and
propagation of microcracks, and the geometry of the material. There has been no one set theory "set in stone" to handle all of these factors in fracture. However
there are many proposed theories used to understand the complex nature of fracture in the material. One such class of theories involved energy concepts. In
order to understand the complex nature of fracture in materials, one must understand the nature and character of initial cracking. This is only possible if we know
the distribution of internal stressed in the body, but also the stress needed to initiate fracture and the length of the crack as shown in Figure 1.
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
E: modulus of elasticity
gs = specific surface energy
a = one half the length of an internal crack
In today's material world many materials also experience some plastic deformation during fracture during fracture. Therefore the crack extension involves more
than just an increase in surface energy. gp represents a plastic deformation energy associated with crack extension. gs + gp can be substituted into the above
equation to model materials that undergo some plastic deformation.
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
Solution
(36.5 ergs / cm2)*(1 Joule / 1.0 * 107 ergs)*(100 cm / m)2 = .0365 J / m2
2.38 GPa = 2.38 *109 Pa
dt: the energy of fracture necessary for the formation of a new fracture surface area.
G :the energy released into the crack tip per unit area of the crack (rate of elastic strain energy release).
d : the crack growth increment.
Energy Release Rate
The energy release rate often denoted by G is the amount of energy, per unit length along the crack edge, that is supplied by the elastic energy in the body and by
the loading system in creating the new fracture surface area. In terms of the stress intensity factor there is relationship called the Irwin relationship. Note that
there our two models for the stress intensity factor one for plane stress and plane strain.
(Plane Strain)
G: the energy release rate.
n: Poisson's Ratio.
K: the stress intensity factor.
E: the modulus of elasticity.
G=K2/E (Plane Stress)
G: the energy release rate.
K: the stress intensity factor.
E: the modulus of elasticity.
The total energy release rate in combined mode cracking can be obtained by adding the energies from the different modes (Figure 4.),
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com
Fig. 4 Three modes of crack surface displacements Mode I (opening or tensile mode), Mode II (sliding mode), and Mode III (tearing mode).
(From Parton V.Z. Fracture Mechanics from Theory to Practice Pg. 66 Figure 47, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.)
These models by Irwin started the foundation of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). This discipline of fracture mechanics characterizes the state of material
loading over a volume of sufficient size that the fracture strength of many engineering materials can be given in terms of the critical (maximum) stress intensity
factor, KIC.
Fig. 5 A cracked body with a force (F) and (a) is the crack length.
(From Portela A., Dual Boundary Element Analysis of Crack Growth, Pg. 26 Figure 2.4, Computational Mechanics Publications.)
Shown in the figure is a cracked body with a force being exerted on it and the propagation of a crack (Figure 5.).
A proportion law of L. Gillemot states that to the same deformation of two geometrically similar specimens from similar material, similar specific energy is
necessary if the cross head speed is proportional with the diameters of the specimen.
U1 and U2: cross head speeds applied during the tensile test.
d1 and d2: diameters of the specimen.
Impact Energy Testing Methods
In order to learn more about the complex nature of fracture in materials impact testing conditions were established. The conditions that were judged the most
relative to the potential for fracture are:
1. deformation at low temperatures
2. a high strain rate (rate of deformation)
3. a triaxial stress state
Two tests called the Charpy and Izod tests are used to measure the impact energy (also known as notch toughness). These tests are important, because one
can obtain information to model the behavior of actual structures so that the laboratory test results can be used to predict service performance under different
environments.
With the Charpy V-notch (CVN) technique, the specimen is in the shape of a bar of square cross section with a V notch. The load is applied as an impact below
from a weighted pendulum hammer that is released from a position h. The pendulum with a knife edge strikes and fractures the specimen at the notch. The
pendulum continues its swing, rising to a maximum height h', which is lower than h. The energy necessary to fracture the test piece is directly calculated from the
difference in initial and final heights of the swinging pendulum (Figure 7.). The impact energy (toughness) from the Charpy test is related to the area under the total
stress-strain curve. The difference in the Charpy and the Izod techniques is in the way that the specimens are supported in the apparatus machine.
One can expect that materials with large values of strength and ductility to have large impact fracture energies. One has to also note that the impact data are very
sensitive to test conditions such as temperature, specimen size, and notch configuration as can be seen in Figure 8.
Fig. 8 A graph of the temperature dependence on the Charpy V-notch impact energy (curve A) and percent shear fracture (curve B).
(From Callister W.D. Jr., Materials Science and Engineering : An Introduction , Pg. 199 Figure 8.14, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.)
References
1. Callister, William, " Materials Science and Engineering : An Introduction", John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York 1994.
2. Portela A., "Dual Element Analysis of Crack Growth", Computational Mechanics Publications, 1993.
3. Parton V.Z., " Fracture Mechanics : From Theory to Practice", Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1992.
4. Rolfe, Stanley, Barson John. "Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures", Prentice Hall, Inc., 1977.
5. Broek, D. "Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics", Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 1982.
6. Shackelford, J. " Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers", Macmillan Publishing Company, 1985.
For information relating to the example problem: http://www.lib.umich.edu/libhome/Dentistry.lib/Dental_tables/Surffreener.html
Table of Contents
Submitted by Jireh J. Yue
Virginia Tech Materials Science and Engineering
http://www.sv.vt.edu/classes/MSE2094_NoteBook/97ClassProj/anal/yue/energy.html
Last updated: 5/4/97
converted by W eb2PDFConvert.com