Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment delivered on: 29th September, 2015
+
CRL.M.C. 3508/2015
CRL.M.C. 3508/2015
Vide the present petition; petitioners seek directions thereby
Page 1 of 7
FIR No. 47/2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34
IPC registered at PS-Bindapur on the complaint of Smt. Shweta
Sabharwal (petitioner no.1 herein).
4.
the aforesaid cases have been settled between the parties vide settlement
dated 28.11.2014 before ld. District Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi.
As per the agreement an amount of Rs.22,00,000/- was agreed to be paid
to Smt. Shweta Sabharwal, petitioner no. 1 herein.
Out of which
State submits that though the respondent no. 2 has come forward to quash
the FIR mentioned above, however, in this process, Govt. machinery has
been put into motion and precious public time of the court
Crl. M.C. No.3508/2015
Page 2 of 7
has been consumed. Therefore, if this Court is inclined to quash the FIR
mentioned above, heavy cost be imposed upon the petitioners.
7.
Page 3 of 7
Page 4 of 7
Page 5 of 7
Both the parties are present in the Court today, approbate to the
of respondent no.2 and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Narinder Singh (supra) and in the
facts and circumstances as noted above, I am of the considered opinion
that this matter deserves to be given a quietus as continuance of
proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in
futility.
10.
Page 6 of 7
submission of the ld. APP for the State on the issue of cost. However,
petitioner no.1 has come forward and agreed to contribute an amount of
Rs.1,00,000/- for some welfare purpose.
12.
A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the
parties.
SURESH KAIT
(JUDGE)
SEPTEMBER 29, 2015
jg
Page 7 of 7