OUTPUT Portfolio8

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN STATISTICS
PORTFOLIO 8 MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES

TRADITIONAL NOTE-TAKING and DIGITAL NOTE-TAKING between and among the means of the following groups:
A. Using t Test
A.1. Gender
A.2. Religion
B. Using One-Way ANOVA with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Test
B.1. College
B.2. Age
A.1. There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale between males and females. (H o3)
A.2. There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale between males and females. (H o4)
PASW RESULTS:
T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Group Statistics
Gender
Traditional Note-Taking 1
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Male
12
3.42
.793
.229
Female
28
3.68
.612
.116
Male
12
3.25
.622
.179
Female
28
3.46
.637
.120
Male
12
3.33
.492
.142
Traditional Note-Taking Ave.
Female
28
3.71
.535
.101
Male
12
3.50
.905
.261
Female
28
3.68
.548
.104
Male
12
3.17
.835
.241
Female
28
3.54
.637
.120
Male
12
3.42
.669
.193
Female
28
3.57
.634
.120
Male
12
3.42
.669
.193
Female
28
3.54
.576
.109
Male
12
3.3575
.55243
.15947
Female
28
3.5975
.49002
.09260
Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
Sig.
t-test for Equality of Means
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Differences
Std. Error
Differences
95% Confidence Interval

of the Difference
Lower
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
2.535
0.584
0.12
0.449
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
0.028
0.868
Upper
-1.134
38
0.264
-0.262
0.231
-0.729
0.206
-1.021
16.882
0.322
-0.262
0.256
-0.803
0.279
-0.982
38
0.333
-0.214
0.218
-0.656
0.228
-0.992
21.375
0.332
-0.214
0.216
-0.663
0.235
-2.112
38
0.041
-0.381
0.18
-0.746
-0.016
-2.185
22.572
0.04
-0.381
0.174
-0.742
-0.02
Equal variances
assumed
2.341
0.134
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.004
0.953
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.105
0.748
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.463
0.5
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Traditional Note-Taking
Average
0.001
0.974
Equal variances
not assumed
-0.771
38
0.445
-0.179
0.232
-0.647
0.29
-0.636
14.585
0.535
-0.179
0.281
-0.779
0.422
-1.528
38
0.135
-0.369
0.242
-0.858
0.12
-1.37
16.754
0.189
-0.369
0.269
-0.938
0.2
-0.696
38
0.491
-0.155
0.222
-0.605
0.295
-0.681
19.912
0.504
-0.155
0.227
-0.629
0.319
-0.571
38
0.571
-0.119
0.209
-0.541
0.303
-0.537
18.36
0.598
-0.119
0.222
-0.584
0.346
-1.367
38
0.18
-0.24
0.17558
-0.59544
0.11544
-1.301
18.798
0.209
-0.24
0.18441
-0.62626
0.14626
DATA PRESENTATION:
Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale between Male and Female Respondents
Traditional Note-Taking Scale
I feel good about taking notes on a paper/ notebook.
I am able to take notes faster by writing on a paper/ notebook.
I can understand the concept when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.
Gender
Mean
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
3.42
3.68
3.25
3.46
3.33
3.71
Standard
Deviation
0.793
0.612
0.622
0.637
0.492
0.535
t - Value
Sig
Decision on
Ho
Interpretation
-1.134
0.264
Accepted
Not Significant
-0.982
0.333
Accepted Not Significant
-2.112
0.041
Rejected
Significant
I always get a clear idea of what the instructor discussed when I take
notes on a paper/ notebook.
I learn best when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.
I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a paper/
notebook.
On the whole, I am able to perform well in my class when I take notes
on a paper/ notebook.
Composite Mean
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
3.5
3.68
3.17
3.54
3.42
3.57
3.42
3.54
3.3575
3.5975
T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Group Statistics
Gender
Digital Note-Taking 1
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Male
12
2.58
.515
.149
Female
28
2.43
.790
.149
Male
12
2.83
.718
.207
Female
28
2.89
.832
.157
Male
12
2.83
.835
.241
Female
28
2.54
.637
.120
Male
12
2.67
.651
.188
Female
28
2.39
.737
.139
Male
12
2.75
.866
.250
Female
28
2.36
.678
.128
Male
12
2.67
.778
.225
Female
28
2.50
.638
.121
0.905
0.548
0.835
0.637
0.669
0.634
0.669
0.576
0.55243
0.49002
-0.771
0.445
Accepted
Not Significant
-1.528
0.135
Accepted
Not Significant
-0.696
0.491
Accepted
Not Significant
-0.571
0.571
Accepted
Not Significant
-1.367
0.180
Accepted
Not Significant
Digital Note-Taking Average
Male
12
2.75
.754
.218
Female
28
2.46
.637
.120
Male
12
2.7258
.59473
.17168
Female
28
2.5107
.55640
.10515

Levene's Test for
Sig.
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Differences
Std. Error
Differences

of the Difference
Lower
Equal variances
assumed
2.644
0.112
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.033
0.856
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
1.331
0.256
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.271
0.606
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances not
assumed
0.429
0.516
Upper
0.622
38
0.538
0.155
0.249
-0.349
0.659
0.735
31.383
0.468
0.155
0.211
-0.275
0.584
-0.216
38
0.831
-0.06
0.276
-0.619
0.5
-0.229
24.059
0.821
-0.06
0.26
-0.596
0.477
1.232
38
0.226
0.298
0.242
-0.191
0.787
1.105
16.754
0.285
0.298
0.269
-0.271
0.867
1.112
38
0.273
0.274
0.246
-0.225
0.772
1.17
23.511
0.254
0.274
0.234
-0.21
0.757
1.543
38
0.131
0.393
0.255
-0.122
0.908
1.398
17.067
0.18
0.393
0.281
-0.2
0.985
Digital Note-Taking
Average
Equal variances
assumed
0.907
0.347
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances not
assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.29
0.337
0.593
0.565
Equal variances not

assumed
0.708
38
0.483
0.167
0.235
-0.31
0.643
0.653
17.654
0.522
0.167
0.255
-0.37
0.703
1.23
38
0.226
0.286
0.232
-0.184
0.756
1.149
18.08
0.266
0.286
0.249
-0.237
0.808
1.098
38
0.279
0.21512
0.1959
-0.18145
0.61169
1.069
19.672
0.298
0.21512
0.20132
-0.20528
0.63552
DATA PRESENTATION:
Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale between Male and Female Respondents
Digital Note-Taking Scale
Gender
Male
Female
I am able to take notes faster by taking a picture of the lessons on a phone/ Male
tablet.
Female
I can understand the concept when I take picture of the lessons on a phone/ Male
tablet.
Female
I always get a clear idea of what the instructor discussed when I take notes on a Male
phone/ tablet.
Female
Male
Female
I learn best when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.
Male
Female
I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.
I feel good about taking notes on a phone/ tablet.
Mean
Standard
Deviation
2.58
0.515
2.43
0.79
2.83
0.718
2.89
0.832
2.83
0.835
2.54
0.637
2.67
0.651
2.39
0.737
2.75
0.866
2.36
0.678
2.67
0.778
2.5
0.638
t - Value
Sig Decision on Ho
Interpretation
0.622
0.538
Accepted
Not Significant
-0.216
0.831
Accepted
Not Significant
1.232
0.226
Accepted
Not Significant
1.112
0.273
Accepted
Not Significant
1.543
0.131
Accepted
Not Significant
0.708
0.483
Accepted
Not Significant
On the whole, I am able to perform well in my class when I take notes on a

phone/ tablet.
Composite Mean
Male
Female
Male
Female
2.75
0.754
2.46
0.637
2.7258
0.59473
2.5107
0.5564
1.23
0.226
Accepted
Not Significant
1.098
0.279
Accepted
Not Significant
FINDINGS:
There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale between males and females.
There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale between males and females.
CONCLUSION:
Accept Ho3 and Ho4
INTERPRETATION:
The male and female groups have similar over-all views on the traditional note-taking scale.
The male and female groups have similar over-all views on the digital note-taking scale.
A.3. There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic. (H o5)
A.4. There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic. (H o6)
PASW RESULTS:
T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Group Statistics
Religion
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Roman Catholic
28
3.64
.621
.117
Non- Catholic
12
3.50
.798
.230
Roman Catholic
28
3.46
.576
.109
Non- Catholic
12
3.25
.754
.218
Roman Catholic
28
3.64
.488
.092
Non- Catholic
12
3.50
.674
.195
Roman Catholic
28
3.71
.460
.087
Non- Catholic
12
3.42
.996
.288
Roman Catholic
28
3.54
.576
.109
Non- Catholic
12
3.17
.937
.271
Roman Catholic
28
3.64
.559
.106
Non- Catholic
12
3.25
.754
.218
Roman Catholic
28
3.61
.497
.094
Non- Catholic
12
3.25
.754
.218
Roman Catholic
28
3.6075
.39750
.07512
Average
Non- Catholic
12
3.3342
.70261
.20283
Levene's Test for

Sig.
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Differences

of the Difference
Std. Error
Differences
Lower
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
1.626
1.022
0.21
0.319
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
3.413
0.072
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
9.264
0.004
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
1.727
0.197
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
1.841
0.183
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
3.739
0.061
Upper
0.611
38
0.545
0.143
0.234
-0.330
0.616
0.553
16.998
0.588
0.143
0.259
-0.403
0.688
0.982
38
0.333
0.214
0.218
-0.228
0.656
0.881
16.771
0.391
0.214
0.243
-0.300
0.728
0.755
38
0.455
0.143
0.189
-0.240
0.526
0.663
16.161
0.516
0.143
0.215
-0.313
0.599
1.304
38
0.2
0.298
0.228
-0.164
0.76
0.991
13.058
0.34
0.298
0.3
-0.351
0.946
1.528
38
0.135
0.369
0.242
-0.120
0.858
1.265
14.694
0.226
0.369
0.292
-0.254
0.992
1.832
38
0.075
0.393
0.214
-0.041
0.827
1.624
16.419
0.123
0.393
0.242
-0.119
0.905
1.775
38
0.084
0.357
0.201
-0.050
0.765
1.507
15.271
0.152
0.357
0.237
-0.147
0.862
Traditional Note-Taking Average
Equal variances
assumed
1.993
0.166
Equal variances
not assumed
1.568
38
0.125
0.27333
0.17429
-0.0795
0.62617
1.264
14.117
0.227
0.27333
0.21629
-0.1902
0.73687
DATA PRESENTATION:
Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic Respondents
Traditional Note-Taking Scale
I feel good about taking notes on a paper/ notebook.
I am able to take notes faster by writing on a paper/ notebook.
I can understand the concept when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.
I always get a clear idea of what the instructor discussed when I take notes
I learn best when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.
I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.

On the whole, I am able to perform well in my class when I take notes on a
paper/ notebook.
Composite Mean
Religion
Mean
Standard
t - Value
Deviation
Roman Catholic
3.64
0.621
Non- Catholic
3.50
0.798
Roman Catholic
3.46
0.576
Non- Catholic
3.25
0.754
Roman Catholic
3.64
0.488
Non- Catholic
3.50
0.674
Roman Catholic
3.71
0.46
Non- Catholic
3.42
0.996
Roman Catholic
3.54
0.576
Non- Catholic
3.17
0.937
Roman Catholic
3.64
0.559
Non- Catholic
3.25
0.754
Roman Catholic
3.61
0.497
Non- Catholic
3.25
0.754
3.6075
0.3975
Roman Catholic
Sig
Decision on
Interpretation
Ho
Accepted
Not Significant
0.611
0.545
0.982
0.333 Accepted
0.755
0.455
Accepted
Not Significant
1.304
0.200
Accepted
Not Significant
1.528
0.135
1.832
0.075
1.775
0.084
1.568
0.125
Not Significant
Non- Catholic
3.3342
0.70261
T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Group Statistics
Religion
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Roman Catholic
28
2.57
.634
.120
Non- Catholic
12
2.25
.866
.250
Roman Catholic
28
3.04
.693
.131
Non- Catholic
12
2.50
.905
.261
Roman Catholic
28
2.71
.659
.124
Non- Catholic
12
2.42
.793
.229
Roman Catholic
28
2.57
.690
.130
Non- Catholic
12
2.25
.754
.218
Roman Catholic
28
2.54
.693
.131
Non- Catholic
12
2.33
.888
.256
Roman Catholic
28
2.61
.629
.119
Non- Catholic
12
2.42
.793
.229
Roman Catholic
28
2.57
.573
.108
Non- Catholic
12
2.50
.905
.261
Roman Catholic
28
2.6586
.51774
.09784
Non- Catholic
12
2.3808
.65731
.18975

Levene's Test for
Sig.
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Differences
Std. Error
Differences

of the Difference
Lower
Digital Note-Taking
Average
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances not
assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.716
2.631
0.403
0.113
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.569
0.455
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.214
0.646
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.837
0.366
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
0.706
0.406
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
4.766
0.035
Equal variances not

assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances not
assumed
0.265
0.609
Upper
1.314
38
0.197
0.321
0.245
-0.174
0.817
1.159
16.286
0.263
0.321
0.277
-0.265
0.908
2.042
38
0.048
0.536
0.262
0.005
1.067
1.834
16.796
0.084
0.536
0.292
-0.081
1.153
1.232
38
0.226
0.298
0.242
-0.191
0.787
1.142
17.832
0.268
0.298
0.261
-0.25
0.845
1.314
38
0.197
0.321
0.245
-0.174
0.817
1.267
19.306
0.22
0.321
0.254
-0.209
0.852
0.777
38
0.442
0.202
0.26
-0.325
0.729
0.703
17.023
0.491
0.202
0.288
-0.405
0.809
0.811
38
0.422
0.19
0.235
-0.285
0.666
0.739
17.22
0.47
0.19
0.258
-0.353
0.734
0.302
38
0.764
0.071
0.237
-0.407
0.55
0.253
14.926
0.804
0.071
0.283
-0.531
0.674
1.433
38
0.16
0.27774
0.19381
-0.11461
0.67009
1.301
17.134
0.211
0.27774
0.21349
-0.17242
0.7279
DATA PRESENTATION:
Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic Respondents
Digital Note-Taking Scale
Religion
Mean
Standard
Deviation
Roman Catholic
2.57
0.634
Non- Catholic
2.25
0.866
I am able to take notes faster by taking a picture of the lessons on a phone/ Roman Catholic
Non- Catholic
tablet.
I can understand the concept when I take picture of the lessons on a Roman Catholic
Non- Catholic
phone/ tablet.
I always get a clear idea of what the instructor discussed when I take notes Roman Catholic
Non- Catholic
on a phone/ tablet.
3.04
0.693
2.5
0.905
2.71
0.659
2.42
0.793
I feel good about taking notes on a phone/ tablet.
2.57
0.69
2.25
0.754
Roman Catholic
2.54
0.693
Non- Catholic
2.33
0.888
Roman Catholic
2.61
0.629
I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.

On the whole, I am able to perform well in my class when I take notes on a Roman Catholic
Non- Catholic
phone/ tablet.
2.42
0.793
2.57
0.573
2.5
0.905
Roman Catholic
2.6586
0.51774
Non- Catholic
2.3808
0.65731
I learn best when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.
Non- Catholic
Composite Mean
t - Value
Sig
Decision on Ho
Interpretation
1.314
0.197
Accepted
Not Significant
2.042
0.048
Rejected
1.232
0.226
Accepted
1.314
0.197
0.777
0.442
Accepted
Not Significant
0.811
0.422
Accepted
Not Significant
0.302
0.764
Accepted
Not Significant
1.433
0.160
Accepted
Not Significant
FINDINGS:
There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale between Roman Catholics and Non-Catholics.
Accepted
Significant
Not Significant
Not Significant
There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale between Roman Catholics and Non-Catholics.
CONCLUSION:
Accept Ho5 and Ho6
INTERPRETATION:
The Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic groups have similar over-all views on the traditional note-taking scale.
The Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic groups have similar over-all views on the digital note-taking scale.
B.1. There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale among the different colleges. (H o1)
B.2. There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale among the different colleges. (H o2)
PASW RESULTS:
Oneway (Traditional Note-Taking)
Descriptives
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
CAM
24
3.71
.550
.112
3.48
3.94
CAS
14
3.43
.852
.228
2.94
3.92
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
3.60
.672
.106
3.39
3.81
CAM
24
3.25
.532
.109
3.03
3.47
CAS
14
3.64
.745
.199
3.21
4.07
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
3.40
.632
.100
3.20
3.60
CAM
24
3.54
.509
.104
3.33
3.76
CAS
14
3.71
.611
.163
3.36
4.07
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
3.60
.545
.086
3.43
3.77
CAM
24
3.63
.495
.101
3.42
3.83
CAS
14
3.57
.938
.251
3.03
4.11
4.00
.000
.000
4.00
4.00
Total
40
3.63
.667
.106
3.41
3.84
CAM
24
3.50
.590
.120
3.25
3.75
CAS
14
3.29
.914
.244
2.76
3.81
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
3.43
.712
.113
3.20
3.65
CAM
24
3.63
.576
.118
3.38
3.87
CAS
14
3.43
.756
.202
2.99
3.87
3.00
.000
.000
3.00
3.00
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
Total
40
3.53
.640
.101
3.32
3.73
CAM
24
3.58
.504
.103
3.37
3.80
CAS
14
3.36
.745
.199
2.93
3.79
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
3.50
.599
.095
3.31
3.69
CAM
24
3.5483
.38261
.07810
3.3868
3.7099
2.57
4.00
CAS
14
3.4900
.72523
.19383
3.0713
3.9087
1.86
4.00
Average
MDCON
3.5000
.29698
.21000
.8317
6.1683
3.29
3.71
40
3.5255
.51451
.08135
3.3610
3.6900
1.86
4.00
MDCON
Total
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
.357
Within Groups
16.887
37
.456
Total
17.600
39
1.386
.693
Within Groups
14.214
37
.384
Total
15.600
39
.285
.142
Within Groups
11.315
37
.306
Total
11.600
39
.321
.161
Within Groups
17.054
37
.461
Total
17.375
39
.418
.209
19.357
37
.523
Between Groups
Between Groups
Mean Square
.713
Between Groups
df
Between Groups
Within Groups
Sig.
.781
.465
1.804
.179
.465
.632
.349
.708
.399
.674
Total
19.775
39
.921
.461
Within Groups
15.054
37
.407
Total
15.975
39
.452
.226
Within Groups
13.548
37
.366
Total
14.000
39
.031
.016
Within Groups
10.293
37
.278
Total
10.324
39
Between Groups
Between Groups
Average
Between Groups
1.132
.333
.618
.545
.057
.945
Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Tukey HSD
Dependent Variable
(I) College
(J) College
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Sig.
(I-J)
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM

Lower Bound
Upper Bound
CAS
.280
.227
.443
-.27
.83
MDCON
.208
.497
.908
-1.01
1.42
CAM
-.280
.227
.443
-.83
.27
MDCON
-.071
.511
.989
-1.32
1.18
CAM
-.208
.497
.908
-1.42
1.01
CAS
.071
.511
.989
-1.18
1.32
CAS
-.393
.208
.157
-.90
.12
MDCON
-.250
.456
.848
-1.36
.86
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
.393
.208
.157
-.12
.90
MDCON
.143
.469
.950
-1.00
1.29
CAM
.250
.456
.848
-.86
1.36
CAS
-.143
.469
.950
-1.29
1.00
CAS
-.173
.186
.626
-.63
.28
MDCON
.042
.407
.994
-.95
1.04
CAM
.173
.186
.626
-.28
.63
MDCON
.214
.418
.866
-.81
1.23
CAM
-.042
.407
.994
-1.04
.95
CAS
-.214
.418
.866
-1.23
.81
CAS
.054
.228
.970
-.50
.61
MDCON
-.375
.500
.735
-1.59
.84
CAM
-.054
.228
.970
-.61
.50
MDCON
-.429
.513
.684
-1.68
.82
CAM
.375
.500
.735
-.84
1.59
CAS
.429
.513
.684
-.82
1.68
CAS
.214
.243
.656
-.38
.81
MDCON
.000
.532
1.000
-1.30
1.30
CAM
-.214
.243
.656
-.81
.38
MDCON
-.214
.547
.919
-1.55
1.12
CAM
.000
.532
1.000
-1.30
1.30
CAS
.214
.547
.919
-1.12
1.55
CAS
.196
.215
.634
-.33
.72
MDCON
.625
.469
.387
-.52
1.77
-.196
.215
.634
-.72
.33
.429
.482
.651
-.75
1.61
CAM
-.625
.469
.387
-1.77
.52
CAS
-.429
.482
.651
-1.61
.75
CAM
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
Average
CAS
MDCON
CAS
.226
.203
.513
-.27
.72
MDCON
.083
.445
.981
-1.00
1.17
CAM
-.226
.203
.513
-.72
.27
MDCON
-.143
.457
.948
-1.26
.97
CAM
-.083
.445
.981
-1.17
1.00
CAS
.143
.457
.948
-.97
1.26
CAS
.05833
.17737
.942
-.3747
.4914
MDCON
.04833
.38817
.991
-.8994
.9961
CAM
-.05833
.17737
.942
-.4914
.3747
MDCON
-.01000
.39870
1.000
-.9834
.9634
CAM
-.04833
.38817
.991
-.9961
.8994
CAS
.01000
.39870
1.000
-.9634
.9834
Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale Among Different Colleges

College
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
I am able to take notes faster by writing
CAS
MDCON
CAM
I can understand the concept when I take
CAS
MDCON
I always get a clear idea of what the
CAM
I feel good about taking notes on a paper/

notebook.
Mean
Standard
F - value
Deviation
3.71
0.55
3.43
0.852
Sig
Decision on Ho Interpretation
0.781
0.465
Accepted
Not Significant
1.804
0.179
Accepted
Not Significant
3.5
0.707
3.25
0.532
3.64
0.745
3.5
0.707
3.54
0.509
3.71
0.611
0.465
0.632
Accepted
Not Significant
3.5
3.63
0.707
0.495
0.349
0.708
Accepted
Not Significant
instructor discussed when I take notes on a CAS

paper/ notebook.
MDCON
CAM
I learn best when I take notes on a paper/
CAS
notebook.
MDCON
CAM
I feel I have an efficient system when I
CAS
take notes on a paper/ notebook.
MDCON
On the whole, I am able to perform well in CAM
CAS
my class when I take notes on a paper/
notebook.
MDCON
CAM
CAS
Composite Mean
MDCON
3.57
0.938
3.5
0.59
3.29
0.914
3.5
0.707
3.63
0.576
3.43
0.756
3.58
0.504
3.36
0.745
3.5
0.707
3.5483
0.38261
3.49
0.72523
3.5
0.29698
0.399
0.674
Accepted
Not Significant
1.132
0.333
Accepted
Not Significant
0.618
0.545
Accepted
Not Significant
0.057
0.945
Accepted
Not Significant
PASW RESULTS:
Oneway (Digital Note-Taking)
Descriptives
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error

Lower Bound
CAM
24
2.54
.588
.120
2.29
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
2.79
CAS
14
2.29
.825
.221
1.81
2.76
3.00
1.414
1.000
-9.71
15.71
Total
40
2.48
.716
.113
2.25
2.70
CAM
24
3.08
.654
.133
2.81
3.36
CAS
14
2.50
.941
.251
1.96
3.04
3.00
.000
.000
3.00
3.00
Total
40
2.88
.791
.125
2.62
3.13
CAM
24
2.54
.588
.120
2.29
2.79
CAS
14
2.64
.842
.225
2.16
3.13
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
2.63
.705
.111
2.40
2.85
CAM
24
2.46
.658
.134
2.18
2.74
CAS
14
2.36
.745
.199
1.93
2.79
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
2.48
.716
.113
2.25
2.70
CAM
24
2.38
.647
.132
2.10
2.65
CAS
14
2.50
.855
.228
2.01
2.99
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
Total
40
2.48
.751
.119
2.23
2.72
CAM
24
2.58
.717
.146
2.28
2.89
CAS
14
2.50
.650
.174
2.12
2.88
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
Total
40
2.55
.677
.107
2.33
2.77
CAM
24
2.46
.509
.104
2.24
2.67
CAS
14
2.50
.760
.203
2.06
2.94
4.00
.000
.000
4.00
4.00
40
2.55
.677
.107
2.33
2.77
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
MDCON
Total
CAM
24
2.5775
.46199
.09430
2.3824
2.7726
2.00
3.71
CAS
14
2.4700
.70185
.18758
2.0648
2.8752
1.00
3.43
3.2850
.40305
.28500
-.3363
6.9063
3.00
3.57
40
2.5753
.56925
.09001
2.3932
2.7573
1.00
3.71
MDCON
Total
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
.580
Within Groups
18.815
37
.509
Total
19.975
39
3.042
1.521
Within Groups
21.333
37
.577
Total
24.375
39
1.702
.851
Within Groups
17.673
37
.478
Total
19.375
39
2.302
1.151
Within Groups
17.673
37
.478
Total
19.975
39
2.350
1.175
Within Groups
19.625
37
.530
Total
21.975
39
.067
.033
Within Groups
17.833
37
.482
Total
17.900
39
4.442
2.221
13.458
37
.364
Between Groups
Between Groups
Between Groups
Between Groups
Mean Square
1.160
Between Groups
df
Between Groups
Within Groups
Sig.
1.140
.331
2.638
.085
1.782
.182
2.410
.104
2.215
.123
.069
.933
6.106
.005
Total
17.900
39
1.163
.581
Within Groups
11.475
37
.310
Total
12.638
39
Between Groups
1.874
.168
Post Hoc Tests

Tukey HSD
Dependent Variable
(I) College
(J) College
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Sig.
(I-J)
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
CAS

Lower Bound
Upper Bound
.256
.240
.540
-.33
.84
MDCON
-.458
.525
.660
-1.74
.82
CAM
-.256
.240
.540
-.84
.33
MDCON
-.714
.539
.391
-2.03
.60
CAM
.458
.525
.660
-.82
1.74
CAS
.714
.539
.391
-.60
2.03
CAS
.583
.255
.071
-.04
1.21
MDCON
.083
.559
.988
-1.28
1.45
CAM
-.583
.255
.071
-1.21
.04
MDCON
-.500
.574
.662
-1.90
.90
CAM
-.083
.559
.988
-1.45
1.28
CAS
.500
.574
.662
-.90
1.90
CAS
-.101
.232
.901
-.67
.47
MDCON
-.958
.509
.158
-2.20
.28
.101
.232
.901
-.47
.67
-.857
.522
.242
-2.13
.42
CAM
MDCON
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAM
.958
.509
.158
-.28
2.20
CAS
.857
.522
.242
-.42
2.13
CAS
.101
.232
.901
-.47
.67
-1.042
.509
.115
-2.28
.20
-.101
.232
.901
-.67
.47
-1.143
.522
.087
-2.42
.13
CAM
1.042
.509
.115
-.20
2.28
CAS
1.143
.522
.087
-.13
2.42
CAS
-.125
.245
.867
-.72
.47
-1.125
.536
.104
-2.43
.18
.125
.245
.867
-.47
.72
-1.000
.551
.178
-2.34
.34
CAM
1.125
.536
.104
-.18
2.43
CAS
1.000
.551
.178
-.34
2.34
CAS
.083
.233
.932
-.49
.65
MDCON
.083
.511
.985
-1.16
1.33
CAM
-.083
.233
.932
-.65
.49
MDCON
.000
.525
1.000
-1.28
1.28
CAM
-.083
.511
.985
-1.33
1.16
CAS
.000
.525
1.000
-1.28
1.28
CAS
-.042
.203
.977
-.54
.45
.444
.004
-2.63
-.46
.042
.203
.977
-.45
.54
-1.500
.456
.006
-2.61
-.39
1.542
.444
.004
.46
2.63
CAS
1.500
.456
.006
.39
2.61
CAS
.10750
.18729
.835
-.3498
.5648
MDCON
CAM
MDCON
MDCON
CAM
MDCON
MDCON
CAM
MDCON
CAM
-1.542
CAS
MDCON
MDCON
-.70750
.40987
.209
-1.7082
.2932
CAM
-.10750
.18729
.835
-.5648
.3498
MDCON
-.81500
.42098
.143
-1.8428
.2128
CAM
.70750
.40987
.209
-.2932
1.7082
CAS
.81500
.42098
.143
-.2128
1.8428
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale Among Different Colleges
Digital Note-Taking
I feel good about taking notes on a phone/
tablet.
I am able to take notes faster by taking a
picture of the lessons on a phone/ tablet.
I can understand the concept when I take
instructor discussed when I take notes on a
phone/ tablet.
I learn best when I take notes on a phone/
tablet.
College
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
MDCON
CAM
CAS
Standard
F - value
Deviation
Mean
2.54
0.588
2.29
0.825
1.414
3.08
0.654
2.5
0.941
2.54
0.588
2.64
0.842
3.5
0.707
2.46
0.658
2.36
0.745
3.5
0.707
2.38
2.5
0.647
0.855
Sig
Decision on
Interpretation
Ho
1.14
0.331
Accepted
Not
Significant
2.638
0.085
Accepted
Not
Significant
1.782
0.182
Accepted
Not
Significant
2.41
0.104
Accepted
Not
Significant
2.215
0.123
Accepted
Not
Significant
MDCON
CAM
I feel I have an efficient system when I take
CAS
notes on a phone/ tablet.
MDCON
CAM
On the whole, I am able to perform well in
CAS
my class when I take notes on a phone/
tablet.
MDCON
CAM
CAS
Composite Mean
MDCON
3.5
0.707
2.58
0.717
2.5
0.65
2.5
0.707
2.46
0.509
2.5
0.76
2.5775
0.46199
2.47
0.70185
3.285
0.40305
0.069
0.933
Accepted
Not
Significant
6.106
0.005
Accepted
Not
Significant
1.874
0.168
Accepted
Not
Significant
FINDINGS:
There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale among different colleges.
There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale among different colleges.
CONCLUSION:
Accept Ho1 and Ho2
INTERPRETATION:
All the three (3) colleges have similar over-all views on the traditional note-taking scale.
All the three (3) have similar over-all views on the digital note-taking scale.
B.3. There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale among the different age groups. (H o7)
B.4. There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale among the different age groups. (H o8)
PASW RESULTS:
Oneway (Traditional Note-Taking)
Descriptives
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error

Lower Bound
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
15-16
3.00
1.414
1.000
-9.71
15.71
17-18
23
3.61
.656
.137
3.32
3.89
19 and above
15
3.67
.617
.159
3.32
4.01
Total
40
3.60
.672
.106
3.39
3.81
15-16
4.00
.000
.000
4.00
4.00
17-18
23
3.35
.647
.135
3.07
3.63
19 and above
15
3.40
.632
.163
3.05
3.75
Total
40
3.40
.632
.100
3.20
3.60
15-16
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
17-18
23
3.74
.449
.094
3.54
3.93
19 and above
15
3.40
.632
.163
3.05
3.75
Total
40
3.60
.545
.086
3.43
3.77
15-16
3.50
.707
.500
-2.85
9.85
17-18
23
3.65
.714
.149
3.34
3.96
19 and above
15
3.60
.632
.163
3.25
3.95
Total
40
3.63
.667
.106
3.41
3.84
15-16
3.00
.000
.000
3.00
3.00
17-18
23
3.43
.788
.164
3.09
3.78
19 and above
15
3.47
.640
.165
3.11
3.82
Total
40
3.43
.712
.113
3.20
3.65
15-16
3.00
.000
.000
3.00
3.00
17-18
23
3.57
.662
.138
3.28
3.85
19 and above
15
3.53
.640
.165
3.18
3.89
Traditional Note-Taking Average
Total
40
3.53
.640
.101
3.32
3.73
15-16
3.00
.000
.000
3.00
3.00
17-18
23
3.48
.593
.124
3.22
3.73
19 and above
15
3.60
.632
.163
3.25
3.95
Total
40
3.50
.599
.095
3.31
3.69
15-16
3.2850
.20506
.14500
1.4426
5.1274
3.14
3.43
17-18
23
3.5474
.51199
.10676
3.3260
3.7688
1.86
4.00
19 and above
15
3.5240
.55987
.14456
3.2140
3.8340
2.00
4.00
Total
40
3.5255
.51451
.08135
3.3610
3.6900
1.86
4.00
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
.394
Within Groups
16.812
37
.454
Total
17.600
39
.783
.391
Within Groups
14.817
37
.400
Total
15.600
39
1.065
.533
Within Groups
10.535
37
.285
Total
11.600
39
.058
.029
Within Groups
17.317
37
.468
Total
17.375
39
.389
Between Groups
Between Groups
Mean Square
.788
Between Groups
df
Between Groups
.195
Sig.
.868
.428
.977
.386
1.871
.168
.062
.940
.372
.692
Within Groups
19.386
37
Total
19.775
39
.589
.295
Within Groups
15.386
37
.416
Total
15.975
39
.661
.330
Within Groups
13.339
37
.361
Total
14.000
39
.127
.063
Within Groups
10.197
37
.276
Total
10.324
39
Between Groups
Between Groups
Average
Between Groups
.524
.709
.499
.917
.409
.230
.796
Post Hoc Tests

Tukey HSD
Dependent Variable
(I) Age
(J) Age
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Sig.
(I-J)
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18

Lower Bound
Upper Bound
17-18
-.609
.497
.446
-1.82
.60
19 and above
-.667
.507
.397
-1.91
.57
.609
.497
.446
-.60
1.82
-.058
.224
.964
-.60
.49
15-16
.667
.507
.397
-.57
1.91
17-18
.058
.224
.964
-.49
.60
17-18
.652
.467
.352
-.49
1.79
19 and above
.600
.476
.427
-.56
1.76
-.652
.467
.352
-1.79
.49
15-16
19 and above
15-16
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
19 and above
-.052
.210
.967
-.56
.46
15-16
-.600
.476
.427
-1.76
.56
17-18
.052
.210
.967
-.46
.56
17-18
-.239
.393
.817
-1.20
.72
19 and above
.100
.402
.966
-.88
1.08
15-16
.239
.393
.817
-.72
1.20
19 and above
.339
.177
.149
-.09
.77
15-16
-.100
.402
.966
-1.08
.88
17-18
-.339
.177
.149
-.77
.09
17-18
-.152
.504
.951
-1.38
1.08
19 and above
-.100
.515
.979
-1.36
1.16
15-16
.152
.504
.951
-1.08
1.38
19 and above
.052
.227
.971
-.50
.61
15-16
.100
.515
.979
-1.16
1.36
17-18
-.052
.227
.971
-.61
.50
17-18
-.435
.534
.696
-1.74
.87
19 and above
-.467
.545
.671
-1.80
.86
.435
.534
.696
-.87
1.74
-.032
.240
.990
-.62
.55
15-16
.467
.545
.671
-.86
1.80
17-18
.032
.240
.990
-.55
.62
17-18
-.565
.475
.467
-1.73
.60
19 and above
-.533
.485
.521
-1.72
.65
15-16
.565
.475
.467
-.60
1.73
19 and above
.032
.214
.988
-.49
.55
15-16
.533
.485
.521
-.65
1.72
17-18
-.032
.214
.988
-.55
.49
17-18
-.478
.443
.532
-1.56
.60
15-16
19 and above
19 and above
17-18
19 and above
15-16
Average
17-18
19 and above
-.600
.452
.389
-1.70
.50
.478
.443
.532
-.60
1.56
-.122
.199
.815
-.61
.36
15-16
.600
.452
.389
-.50
1.70
17-18
.122
.199
.815
-.36
.61
17-18
-.26239
.38702
.778
-1.2073
.6825
19 and above
-.23900
.39519
.818
-1.2038
.7258
15-16
.26239
.38702
.778
-.6825
1.2073
19 and above
.02339
.17423
.990
-.4020
.4488
15-16
.23900
.39519
.818
-.7258
1.2038
17-18
-.02339
.17423
.990
-.4488
.4020
15-16
19 and above
Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale Among Different Age Groups

Age
15-16
Mean
Standard
F - value
Deviation
3.00
1.414
3.61
0.656
19 and above
3.67
0.617
15-16
4.00
3.35
0.647
3.4
0.632
3.50
0.707
3.74
0.449
3.40
0.632
3.50
3.65
0.707
0.714
I feel good about taking notes on a paper/ 17-18

notebook.
I am able to take notes faster by writing 17-18
19 and above
15-16
I can understand the concept when I take 17-18

19 and above

15-16
instructor discussed when I take notes on a 17-18
Sig
Decision on Ho Interpretation
0.868
0.428
Accepted
Not Significant
0.977
0.386
Accepted
Not Significant
1.871
0.168
Accepted
Not Significant
0.062
0.940
Accepted
Not Significant
paper/ notebook.
19 and above
3.60
0.632
15-16
3.00
3.43
0.788
19 and above
3.47
0.64
15-16
3.00
17-18
3.57
0.662
19 and above
3.53
0.64
15-16
3.00
3.48
0.593
3.60
0.632
15-16
3.285
0.20506
17-18
3.5474
0.51199
3.524
0.55987
I learn best when I take notes on a paper/ 17-18

notebook.
take notes on a paper/ notebook.
On the whole, I am able to perform well in

my class when I take notes on a paper/ 17-18
notebook.
19 and above
Composite Mean
19 and above
0.372
0.692
Accepted
Not Significant
0.709
0.499
Accepted
Not Significant
0.917
0.409
Accepted
Not Significant
0.23
0.796
Accepted
Not Significant
PASW RESULTS:
Oneway (Digital Note-Taking)
Descriptives
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error

Lower Bound
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
15-16
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
17-18
23
2.48
.593
.124
2.22
2.73
19 and above
15
2.47
.915
.236
1.96
2.97
Total
40
2.48
.716
.113
2.25
2.70
15-16
2.00
.000
.000
2.00
2.00
17-18
23
2.96
.825
.172
2.60
3.31
19 and above
15
2.87
.743
.192
2.46
3.28
Total
40
2.88
.791
.125
2.62
3.13
15-16
3.00
1.414
1.000
-9.71
15.71
17-18
23
2.52
.665
.139
2.23
2.81
19 and above
15
2.73
.704
.182
2.34
3.12
Total
40
2.63
.705
.111
2.40
2.85
15-16
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
17-18
23
2.43
.728
.152
2.12
2.75
19 and above
15
2.53
.743
.192
2.12
2.94
Total
40
2.48
.716
.113
2.25
2.70
15-16
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
17-18
23
2.43
.843
.176
2.07
2.80
19 and above
15
2.53
.640
.165
2.18
2.89
Total
40
2.48
.751
.119
2.23
2.72
15-16
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
17-18
23
2.65
.714
.149
2.34
2.96
19 and above
15
2.40
.632
.163
2.05
2.75
Total
40
2.55
.677
.107
2.33
2.77
15-16
2.50
.707
.500
-3.85
8.85
17-18
23
2.61
.656
.137
2.32
2.89
19 and above
15
2.47
.743
.192
2.06
2.88
Total
40
2.55
.677
.107
2.33
2.77
15-16
2.5000
.70711
.50000
-3.8531
8.8531
2.00
3.00
17-18
23
2.5839
.60329
.12580
2.3230
2.8448
1.00
3.71
19 and above
15
2.5720
.54233
.14003
2.2717
2.8723
2.00
3.57
Total
40
2.5753
.56925
.09001
2.3932
2.7573
1.00
3.71
ANOVA
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
.001
Within Groups
19.972
37
.540
Total
19.975
39
1.685
.843
Within Groups
22.690
37
.613
Total
24.375
39
.703
.351
Within Groups
18.672
37
.505
Total
19.375
39
.089
.045
Within Groups
19.886
37
.537
Total
19.975
39
.089
.045
Within Groups
21.886
37
.592
Total
21.975
39
.583
.291
Within Groups
17.317
37
.468
Total
17.900
39
.188
.094
Within Groups
17.712
37
.479
Total
17.900
39
Between Groups
Between Groups
Between Groups
Between Groups
Between Groups
Mean Square
.003
Between Groups
df
Sig.
.002
.998
1.374
.266
.696
.505
.083
.920
.076
.927
.622
.542
.197
.822
Between Groups
.013
.007
Within Groups
12.625
37
.341
Total
12.638
39
.019
.981
Post Hoc Tests

Tukey HSD
Dependent Variable
(I) Age
(J) Age
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Sig.
(I-J)
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18

Lower Bound
Upper Bound
17-18
.022
.542
.999
-1.30
1.34
19 and above
.033
.553
.998
-1.32
1.38
-.022
.542
.999
-1.34
1.30
.012
.244
.999
-.58
.61
15-16
-.033
.553
.998
-1.38
1.32
17-18
-.012
.244
.999
-.61
.58
17-18
-.957
.577
.235
-2.37
.45
19 and above
-.867
.589
.317
-2.31
.57
15-16
.957
.577
.235
-.45
2.37
19 and above
.090
.260
.936
-.54
.72
15-16
.867
.589
.317
-.57
2.31
17-18
-.090
.260
.936
-.72
.54
17-18
.478
.524
.635
-.80
1.76
19 and above
.267
.535
.872
-1.04
1.57
-.478
.524
.635
-1.76
.80
15-16
19 and above
15-16
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
17-18
19 and above
15-16
19 and above
-.212
.236
.645
-.79
.36
15-16
-.267
.535
.872
-1.57
1.04
17-18
.212
.236
.645
-.36
.79
17-18
.065
.540
.992
-1.25
1.38
19 and above
-.033
.552
.998
-1.38
1.31
15-16
-.065
.540
.992
-1.38
1.25
19 and above
-.099
.243
.914
-.69
.50
15-16
.033
.552
.998
-1.31
1.38
17-18
.099
.243
.914
-.50
.69
17-18
.065
.567
.993
-1.32
1.45
19 and above
-.033
.579
.998
-1.45
1.38
15-16
-.065
.567
.993
-1.45
1.32
19 and above
-.099
.255
.921
-.72
.52
15-16
.033
.579
.998
-1.38
1.45
17-18
.099
.255
.921
-.52
.72
17-18
-.152
.504
.951
-1.38
1.08
19 and above
.100
.515
.979
-1.16
1.36
15-16
.152
.504
.951
-1.08
1.38
19 and above
.252
.227
.514
-.30
.81
15-16
-.100
.515
.979
-1.36
1.16
17-18
-.252
.227
.514
-.81
.30
17-18
-.109
.510
.975
-1.35
1.14
19 and above
.033
.521
.998
-1.24
1.30
15-16
.109
.510
.975
-1.14
1.35
19 and above
.142
.230
.811
-.42
.70
15-16
-.033
.521
.998
-1.30
1.24
17-18
-.142
.230
.811
-.70
.42
17-18
-.08391
.43063
.979
-1.1353
.9675
19 and above
17-18
19 and above
-.07200
.43972
.985
-1.1456
1.0016
15-16
.08391
.43063
.979
-.9675
1.1353
19 and above
.01191
.19386
.998
-.4614
.4852
15-16
.07200
.43972
.985
-1.0016
1.1456
17-18
-.01191
.19386
.998
-.4852
.4614
Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale Among Different Age Groups
Digital Note-Taking
Age
15-16
Standard
F - value
Deviation
Mean
I feel good about taking notes on a phone/ 17-18

tablet.
2.5
0.707
2.48
0.593
2.47
0.915
15-16
19 and above
I am able to take notes faster by taking a 17-18

2.96
0.825
2.87
0.743
15-16
19 and above
Sig
Decision on
Interpretation
Ho
0.002
0.998
Accepted
Not
Significant
1.374
0.266
Accepted
Not
Significant
0.696
0.505
Accepted
Not
Significant
0.083
0.920
Accepted
Not
Significant
Not
Significant
I can understand the concept when I take 17-18

1.414
2.52
0.665
2.73
0.704
15-16
2.5
0.707
2.43
0.728
2.53
0.743
2.5
0.707
2.43
0.843
0.076
0.927
Accepted
2.53
2.5
0.64
0.707
0.622
0.542
Accepted
19 and above

instructor discussed when I take notes on a 17-18
phone/ tablet.
19 and above
15-16
I learn best when I take notes on a phone/ 17-18

tablet.
19 and above
take 15-16
Not
2.65
0.714
19 and above
2.4
0.632
On the whole, I am able to perform well in 15-16

my class when I take notes on a phone/ 17-18
tablet.
19 and above
2.5
0.707
2.61
0.656
2.47
0.743
15-16
2.5
0.70711
17-18
2.5839
0.60329
2.572
0.54233
notes on a phone/ tablet.
Composite Mean
17-18
19 and above
Significant
0.197
0.822
Accepted
Not
Significant
0.019
0.981
Accepted
Not
Significant
FINDINGS:
There is no significant difference on the traditional note-taking scale among different age groups.
There is no significant difference on the digital note-taking scale among different age groups.
CONCLUSION:
Accept Ho7 and Ho8
INTERPRETATION:
All the three (3) age groups have similar over-all views on the traditional note-taking scale.
All the three (3) age groups have similar over-all views on the digital note-taking scale.

OUTPUT Portfolio8

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

OUTPUT Portfolio8

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN STATISTICS

PORTFOLIO 8 MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES

T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Std. Error Mean

Traditional Note-Taking Ave.

Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval

Accepted Not Significant

T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Std. Error Mean

Digital Note-Taking Average

Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

On the whole, I am able to perform well in my class when I take notes on a

Accept Ho3 and Ho4

T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Std. Error Mean

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval

Traditional Note-Taking Average

I learn best when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.

I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a paper/ notebook.

Accepted Not Significant

Accepted Not Significant

Accepted Not Significant

Accepted Not Significant

T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Digital Note-Taking Average

Std. Error Mean

Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Equal variances not

Digital Note-Taking Scale

I feel good about taking notes on a phone/ tablet.

I feel I have an efficient system when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.

I learn best when I take notes on a phone/ tablet.

Accept Ho5 and Ho6

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Post Hoc Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale Among Different Colleges

I feel good about taking notes on a paper/

instructor discussed when I take notes on a CAS

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Digital Note-Taking Average

Post Hoc Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Digital Note-Taking Average