Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Protocol
Effect of Levucell and Bactocell performance of broiler
chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis
-Saccharomyces cereviseae (Levucell improved growth performance almost significantly in
chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. Pediococcus acidilactici (Bactocell) did not
improve performance or onset of lesions in chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis.
Three hundred and fifteen 1-d-old Ross 308 male broiler chickens were randomly
assigned to 5 dietary treatments, including an unchallenged positive control, a challenged
negative control without antibiotic, and a challenged positive control with virginiamycin (Vm).
Levucell and Bactocell were included in two separate treatments at 0.01% (100 g/ton). All
treatments, except the unchallenged positive control, were challenged with necrotic enteritis
(NE). Treatments contained 9 replications of 7 birds each. All birds received a common basal
diet based on corn-soybean meal and containing rye, fishmeal, and wheat midds. The diet was
then supplemented with the test products described in Table 1, which were added at the
expense of corn. On d 8, all birds except the unchallenged control, received a coccidia vaccine
(Cocci-vac) via feed. On d 12, 13, 14, and 15, all birds, except the unchallenged positive
control group, received a Clostridium perfringens inoculum via feed. On d 14 and 15, a group of
challenged birds was euthanized to expose their digestive tract and evaluate the degree of
challenge that the birds had been exposed. Body weight gain (BWG), feed intake, and gain to
feed ratio (GF) were calculated at 7, 12, and 20 d of age. Lesion score was obtained from
selected treatments.
Statistical analysis
Growth performance data was analyzed through ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS.
When considered appropriate, individual treatments were compared using orthogonal contrasts,
for which the P-value is reported.
Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
Description
Unchallenged Control
Challenged Control
As 2 + Virginiamycin
As 2 + Levucell
As 2 + Bactocell
Inclusion Level
0.01%
0.01%
Active Component
Saccharomyces cereviseae
Pediococcus acidilactici
Active Component
Inclusion Level
8
1 x 10 CFU/g
2 E+6 CFU/g
Primary MOA
Probiotic
Probiotic
Inclusion, %
45.77
0.998
29.360
0.287
0.607
4.398
0.141
0.049
0.179
0.033
10.000
0.119
0.060
7.999
100.000
Page 2 of 2
Results
-Birds receiving Levucell showed a trend indicating improvement in body weight at 20 d
growth performance with respect to birds from the negative control. No significant differences
were observed in body weight gain or gain to feed ratio.
-Birds receiving Bactocell did not show a significant improvement in live weight, body weight
gain, or gain to feed ratio.
Page 3 of 3
Table 4. Live weight (g/bird) and weight gain (g/bird) of broiler chickens challenged with necrotic
enteritis and fed different direct-fed microbials
Trt
1
2
3
4
5
Unchall Ctrl
Chall Ctrl
Virginiamycin
Levucell
Bactocell
SEM
CV
GLM P-values
Orthogonal contrasts
0-8 d
c
121.74
ab
131.40
abc
123.13
a
130.50
bc
126.17
3.40
6.46
0.2140
0.0800
Trt 3 vs Trt 2
-0.9270 0.3020 0.0070
Trt 4 vs Trt 2
-0.7560 0.8620 0.0610
0.8520
0.2830
Trt 5 vs Trt 2
-0.6390 0.3270 0.2130
a-e
Means with different superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).
ab
0-20 d
c
184.04
ab
184.10
195.07a
ab
184.22
b
175.68
5.82
7.62
0.2540
425.97
bc
440.06
a
483.45
ab
462.45
bc
455.22
13.33
7.13
0.0780
733.07
b
764.21
a
805.19
ab
778.59
bc
769.07
14.58
4.31
0.063
0.1800
0.9880
0.2840
0.0300
0.2440
0.3980
0.0590
0.4760
0.8090
Table 5. Feed intake (g/bird) and gain to feed ratio (g:kg) of broiler chickens challenged with
necrotic enteritis and fed different direct-fed microbials
Trt
1
2
3
4
5
Unchall Ctrl
Chall Ctrl
Virginiamycin
Levucell
Bactocell
SEM
CV
GLM P-values
Orthogonal contrasts
0-8 d
151.87
161.37
159.90
166.98
158.35
5.46
8.45
0.5410
0-20 d
998.17
1025.33
1044.48
1091.14
1058.9
21.516
4.876
0.0670
0.8430
0.2490 0.2110 0.5220
Trt 3 vs Trt 2
0.4790
0.8010 0.0680 0.0380
Trt 4 vs Trt 2
0.6830
0.7840 0.4030 0.2690
Trt 5 vs Trt 2
a-d
Means with different superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).
0.7750 0.1640
0.5860 0.2550
0.9140 0.9620
0.1590
0.9390
0.6570
Page 4 of 4
Figure 1. Weight gain (g/bird) and gain to feed ratio (g:kg) from 12 to 20 d of age of broiler birds
receiving different direct-fed microbials from 0 to 20 d of age
483.5
480.0
462.5
g/bird
460.0
440.0
455.2
440.1
426.0
420.0
400.0
380.0
Unchall Ctrl
Chall Ctrl
Vm
Levucell
Bactocell
Figure 2. Weight gain (g/bird) and gain to feed ratio (g:kg) from 0 to 20 d of age of broiler birds
receiving different direct-fed microbials from 0 to 20 d of age.
805.2
800.0
778.6
g/bird
780.0
764.2
769.1
760.0
740.0
733.1
720.0
700.0
680.0
Unchall Ctrl
Chall Ctrl
Vm
Levucell
Bactocell
Page 5 of 5
Figure 3. Gain to feed ratio (g:kg) from 0 to 20 d of age of broiler birds receiving different directfed microbials from 0 to 20 d of age
741.12
734.66
g:kg
740
730
733.08
726.13
720
706.06
710
700
690
680
Unchall Ctrl
Chall Ctrl
Vm
Levucell
Bactocell
Page 6 of 6
Page 7 of 7